Open Access
How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2020-02-21
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 10.416
CiteScore: 48.4
Impact factor: 45.8
ISSN: 00368075, 10959203
PubMed ID:
32079744
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
The pervasive power of mycorrhizas Associations between plants and symbiotic fungi—mycorrhizas—are ubiquitous in plant communities. Tedersoo et al. review recent developments in mycorrhizal research, revealing the complex and pervasive nature of this largely invisible interaction. Complex networks of mycorrhizal hyphae connect the root systems of individual plants, regulating nutrient flow and competitive interactions between and within plant species, controlling seedling establishment, and ultimately influencing all aspects of plant community ecology and coexistence. Science, this issue p. eaba1223 BACKGROUND All vascular plants associate with fungi and bacteria—the microbiome. Root associations with mycorrhizal fungi benefit most plants by enhancing their nutrient access and stress tolerance. Mycorrhizal fungi also mediate plant interactions with other soil microbes, including pathogens and mycorrhizosphere mutualists that produce vitamins and protect against antagonists. Through these functions, mycorrhizal root symbionts influence the belowground traits of plants, regulate plant-plant interactions, and alter ecosystem processes. Extensive mycorrhizal networks physically connect conspecific and heterospecific plant individuals belowground, mediating nutrient transfer and transmission of phytochemical signals. Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), ectomycorrhiza (EcM), ericoid mycorrhiza (ErM), and orchid mycorrhiza (OM) have a distinct evolutionary history, anatomy, and ecology, thereby differently affecting plant protection, nutrient acquisition, and belowground C and nutrient cycling. ADVANCES Mycorrhizal fungi are commonly the key determinants of plant population and community dynamics, with several principal differences among mycorrhizal types. We synthesize current knowledge about mycorrhizal effects on plant-plant interactions and ecological specialization. We conclude that mycorrhizal associations per se and fungal diversity and mycorrhizal types directly or indirectly affect plant dispersal and competition that shape plant populations and communities, and regulate plant coexistence and diversity at a local scale. Among AM plants, which represent nearly 80% of plant species globally, mycorrhizal associations and belowground hyphal networks tend to intensify intraspecific competition and alleviate interspecific competition by promoting the performance of inferior competitors. In AM systems, fungal diversity enhances plant diversity and vice versa, by providing species-specific benefits and suppressing superior competitors. Compared with other mycorrhizal types, EcM fungi provide substantial protection against soil-borne pathogens by ensheathing feeder roots and acidifying soil. Pathogen suppression leads to positive plant-soil feedback that promotes seedling establishment near adult trees, which can result in monodominant plant communities with a low diversity of various organism groups. Orchids produce millions of dust seeds with high dispersal potential to encounter compatible OM fungal partners, which nourish plants, at least in the seedling stage. Species of Ericaceae achieve competitive advantage and large population densities by shedding allelopathic litter and establishing ErM root symbiosis with selected groups of ubiquitous humus saprotrophs that have evolved efficient enzymes to access nutrients in recalcitrant organic compounds in strongly acidic environments. OUTLOOK Increasing evidence suggests that mycorrhizal fungi drive plant population biology and community ecology by affecting dispersal and establishment and regulating plant coexistence. Plant-fungal mycorrhizal associations per se and interlinking hyphal networks synergistically determine the functional traits and hence autecology of host plants, which is best reflected in the specialized nutrition and dispersal of orchids. Habitat patches dominated by either positive plant-soil feedback near EcM plants or negative conspecific feedback near AM plants may generate distinct regeneration patches for different plant species. Furthermore, niche differentiation both within and among mycorrhizal types enhances coexistence by leveraging interspecific competition through different rooting depths, foraging strategies, and soil nutrient partitioning. We still lack critical information about the mechanistic basis of several processes, such as interplant nutrient transfer through mycelial networks and the principles of carbon-to-nutrient exchange and trading in the mycorrhizal interface, as well as kin recognition and promotion. Understanding these processes will enable us to improve predictions about the impacts of global change and pollution on vegetation and soil processes and to elaborate technologies to improve yields in agriculture and forestry. Scheme indicating how mycorrhizal types (circles) differ in their effects on plant population- and community-level processes (squares). Blue lines, positive effects; red lines, negative effects; green lines, overlap of plant taxa among mycorrhizal types; pink lines, overlap of fungal taxa among mycorrhizal types. Line breadth indicates relative effect strength. ILLUSTRATION: SIIRI JÜRIS Mycorrhizal fungi provide plants with a range of benefits, including mineral nutrients and protection from stress and pathogens. Here we synthesize current information about how the presence and type of mycorrhizal association affect plant communities. We argue that mycorrhizal fungi regulate seedling establishment and species coexistence through stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms such as soil nutrient partitioning, feedback to soil antagonists, differential mycorrhizal benefits, and nutrient trade. Mycorrhizal fungi have strong effects on plant population and community biology, with mycorrhizal type–specific effects on seed dispersal, seedling establishment, and soil niche differentiation, as well as interspecific and intraspecific competition and hence plant diversity.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
|
New Phytologist
39 publications, 5.29%
|
|
|
Plant and Soil
24 publications, 3.26%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
23 publications, 3.12%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
22 publications, 2.99%
|
|
|
Forests
17 publications, 2.31%
|
|
|
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
16 publications, 2.17%
|
|
|
Functional Ecology
16 publications, 2.17%
|
|
|
Journal of Ecology
15 publications, 2.04%
|
|
|
Applied Soil Ecology
14 publications, 1.9%
|
|
|
Microorganisms
13 publications, 1.76%
|
|
|
Journal of Fungi
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
|
Mycorrhiza
10 publications, 1.36%
|
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
|
Molecular Ecology
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
|
Plants
8 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
8 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Rhizosphere
8 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Ecology Letters
8 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Fungal Ecology
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
|
Nature Ecology and Evolution
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Forest Ecosystems
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Ecology
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Global Ecology and Biogeography
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Fungal Biology
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
PeerJ
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Symbiosis
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishers
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
|
Elsevier
174 publications, 23.61%
|
|
|
Wiley
163 publications, 22.12%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
137 publications, 18.59%
|
|
|
MDPI
81 publications, 10.99%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
55 publications, 7.46%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
25 publications, 3.39%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
22 publications, 2.99%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
8 publications, 1.09%
|
|
|
Scientific Societies
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
PeerJ
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
Annual Reviews
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
MIT Press
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
Korean Society of Mycology
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 0.14%
|
|
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
737
Total citations:
737
Citations from 2024:
325
(44.09%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
TEDERSOO L., BAHRAM M., Zobel M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology // Science. 2020. Vol. 367. No. 6480.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
TEDERSOO L., BAHRAM M., Zobel M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology // Science. 2020. Vol. 367. No. 6480.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1126/science.aba1223
UR - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba1223
TI - How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology
T2 - Science
AU - TEDERSOO, LEHO
AU - BAHRAM, MOHAMMAD
AU - Zobel, Martin
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/02/21
PB - American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
IS - 6480
VL - 367
PMID - 32079744
SN - 0036-8075
SN - 1095-9203
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2020_TEDERSOO,
author = {LEHO TEDERSOO and MOHAMMAD BAHRAM and Martin Zobel},
title = {How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology},
journal = {Science},
year = {2020},
volume = {367},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba1223},
number = {6480},
doi = {10.1126/science.aba1223}
}