Open Access
Open access
Science, volume 370, issue 6523, pages 1473-1479

An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike

Michael Schoof 1, 2
Bryan Faust 1, 2, 3, 4
Reuben A Saunders 1, 5
Smriti Sangwan 1, 2
Nick Hoppe 3, 4
Morgane Boone 1, 2
Marcell Zimanyi 1, 2
Ishan Deshpande 3, 4
Jiahao Liang 3
Michael C. Thompson 4
Kaitlin Schaefer 4
Aditya A Anand 1, 2
Niv Dobzinski 1, 2
Beth S. Zha 7
Camille R. Simoneau 8, 9, 10
Kristoffer E Leon 8, 9, 10
Kris M White 11, 12
Un Seng Chio 4
Meghna Gupta 4
M Jin 4
Fei Li 4
Yanxin Liu 4
Kaihua Zhang 4
David Bulkley 4
Ming Sun 4
Joel M Smith 4
Frank R Moss 4
R Trenker 4
Sayan Gupta 13
Benjamin Barsi Rhyne 3
Vladislav Belyy 1, 2
Andrew W Barile Hill 14
Silke Nock 1, 2
YUWEI LIU 1, 2
Nevan J. Krogan 4, 5, 8, 9
Corie Y. Ralston 13
Danielle Swaney 4, 5, 8, 9
Adolfo GarcĂ­a-Sastre 11, 12, 15, 16
Melanie Ott 8, 9, 10
Peter Walter 1, 2
Aashish Manglik 3, 4, 8, 17
14
 
Cytiva Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-12-18
Journal: Science
Q1
Q1
SJR11.902
CiteScore61.1
Impact factor44.7
ISSN00368075, 10959203
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
Nanobodies that neutralize

Monoclonal antibodies that bind to the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) show therapeutic promise but must be produced in mammalian cells and need to be delivered intravenously. By contrast, single-domain antibodies called nanobodies can be produced in bacteria or yeast, and their stability may enable aerosol delivery. Two papers now report nanobodies that bind tightly to spike and efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in cells. Schoof et al. screened a yeast surface display of synthetic nanobodies and Xiang et al. screened anti-spike nanobodies produced by a llama. Both groups identified highly potent nanobodies that lock the spike protein in an inactive conformation. Multivalent constructs of selected nanobodies achieved even more potent neutralization.

Science , this issue p. 1473 , p. 1479

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Frontiers in Immunology
12 publications, 3.54%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
11 publications, 3.24%
Nature Communications
8 publications, 2.36%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
7 publications, 2.06%
Viruses
5 publications, 1.47%
iScience
5 publications, 1.47%
Journal of Biological Chemistry
5 publications, 1.47%
Journal of Virology
5 publications, 1.47%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
4 publications, 1.18%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
4 publications, 1.18%
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 0.88%
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
3 publications, 0.88%
Cell
3 publications, 0.88%
Cell Reports
3 publications, 0.88%
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
3 publications, 0.88%
Biochemistry
3 publications, 0.88%
mAbs
3 publications, 0.88%
Science
3 publications, 0.88%
Antiviral Research
3 publications, 0.88%
International Journal of Nanomedicine
2 publications, 0.59%
Vaccines
2 publications, 0.59%
Antibodies
2 publications, 0.59%
Molecules
2 publications, 0.59%
Communications Biology
2 publications, 0.59%
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
2 publications, 0.59%
Chem
2 publications, 0.59%
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
2 publications, 0.59%
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
2 publications, 0.59%
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects
2 publications, 0.59%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
71 publications, 20.94%
Elsevier
61 publications, 17.99%
Springer Nature
50 publications, 14.75%
MDPI
31 publications, 9.14%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
24 publications, 7.08%
Wiley
16 publications, 4.72%
Frontiers Media S.A.
15 publications, 4.42%
American Society for Microbiology
10 publications, 2.95%
Taylor & Francis
9 publications, 2.65%
Oxford University Press
8 publications, 2.36%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
8 publications, 2.36%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
7 publications, 2.06%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
6 publications, 1.77%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
5 publications, 1.47%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 0.88%
European Molecular Biology Organization
2 publications, 0.59%
eLife Sciences Publications
2 publications, 0.59%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 0.29%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.29%
Rockefeller University Press
1 publication, 0.29%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.29%
The Company of Biologists
1 publication, 0.29%
The Royal Society
1 publication, 0.29%
Spandidos Publications
1 publication, 0.29%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.29%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.29%
The American Association of Immunologists
1 publication, 0.29%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Schoof M. et al. An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike // Science. 2020. Vol. 370. No. 6523. pp. 1473-1479.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Schoof M. et al. An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike // Science. 2020. Vol. 370. No. 6523. pp. 1473-1479.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Schoof,
author = {Michael Schoof and Bryan Faust and Reuben A Saunders and Smriti Sangwan and Veronica V Rezelj and Nick Hoppe and Morgane Boone and Christian B Billesbølle and Cristina Puchades and C. M. Azumaya and H. Kratochvil and Marcell Zimanyi and Ishan Deshpande and Jiahao Liang and Miles Sasha Dickinson and Kim Cuong Nguyen and Cynthia M Chio and Gregory E Merz and Michael C. Thompson and Devan Diwanji and Kaitlin Schaefer and Aditya A Anand and Niv Dobzinski and Beth S. Zha and Camille R. Simoneau and Kristoffer E Leon and Kris M White and Un Seng Chio and Meghna Gupta and M Jin and Fei Li and Yanxin Liu and Kaihua Zhang and David Bulkley and Ming Sun and Joel M Smith and Alexandrea Rizo and Frank R Moss and Axel F. Brilot and Sergei Pourmal and R Trenker and Thomas H Pospiech and Sayan Gupta and Benjamin Barsi Rhyne and Vladislav Belyy and Andrew W Barile Hill and Silke Nock and YUWEI LIU and Nevan J. Krogan and Corie Y. Ralston and others},
title = {An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike},
journal = {Science},
year = {2020},
volume = {370},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3255},
number = {6523},
pages = {1473--1479},
doi = {10.1126/science.abe3255}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Schoof, Michael, et al. “An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike.” Science, vol. 370, no. 6523, Dec. 2020, pp. 1473-1479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3255.
Found error?