volume 31 issue 4 pages 408-423

Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication

Kathryn V. Walter 1
Daniel Conroy-Beam 1
David M. Buss 2
Kelly Asao 2
Agnieszka Sorokowska 3, 4
Piotr Sorokowski 5
Toivo Aavik 6
Grace Akello 7
Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba 8
Charlotte Alm 9
Naumana Amjad 10
Afifa Anjum 10
Chiemezie S. Atama 11
Derya Atamtürk Duyar 12
Richard Ayebare 13
Carlota Batres 14
Mons Bendixen 15
Aicha Bensafia 16
Boris Bizumic 17
Mahmoud Boussena 18
Marina Butovskaya 19, 20
Seda Can 21
Katarzyna Cantarero 22
Antonin Carrier 23
Hakan Cetinkaya 24
Ilona Croy 25
Rosa María Cueto 26
Marcin Czub 3
Daria Dronova 19
Seda Dural 21
Izzet Duyar 12
Berna Ertugrul 27
Agustín Espinosa 26
Ignacio Estevan 28
Carla Sofia Esteves 29
Luxi Fang 30
Tomasz Frackowiak 3
Jorge Contreras Garduño 31
Karina Ugalde González 32
Farida Guemaz 33
Petra Gyuris 34
Mária Halamová 35
Iskra Herak 36
Marina Horvat 37
Ivana Hromatko 38
Chin-Ming Hui 30
Jas Laile Jaafar 39
Feng Jiang 40
Konstantinos Kafetsios 41
Tina Kavčič 42
Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair 15
Nicolas Kervyn 36
Truong Thi Khanh Ha 43
Imran Ahmed Khilji 44
Nils C. Köbis 45
Hoang Moc Lan 43
András Láng 34
Georgina R. Lennard 17
Ernesto León 26
Torun Lindholm 9
Trinh Thi Linh 43
Giulia Lopez 46
Nguyen Van Luot 43
Alvaro Mailhos 28
Zoi Manesi 47
Rocio Martinez 48
Sarah L. McKerchar 17
Norbert Meskó 34
Girishwar Misra 49
Conal Monaghan 17
Emanuel C. Mora 50
Alba Moya-Garófano 48
Bojan Musil 51
Jean Carlos Natividade 52
Agnieszka Niemczyk 3
George Nizharadze 53
Elisabeth Oberzaucher 54
Anna Oleszkiewicz 3, 4
Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee 55
Ike E. Onyishi 56
Baris Özener 12
Ariela Francesca Pagani 46
Vilmante Pakalniskiene 57
Miriam Parise 46
Farid Pazhoohi 58
Annette Pisanski 50
Katarzyna Pisanski 3, 59
Edna Ponciano 60
Camelia Popa 61
Pavol Prokop 62, 63
Muhammad Rizwan 64
Mario Sainz 65
Svjetlana Salkičević 66
Ruta Sargautyte 57
Ivan Sarmány-Schuller 67
Susanne Schmehl 54
Shivantika Sharad 68
Razi Sultan Siddiqui 69
Franco Simonetti 70
Stanislava Yordanova Stoyanova 71
Meri Tadinac 66
Marco Antonio Correa Varella 72
Christin-Melanie Vauclair 29
Luis Diego Vega 32
Dwi Ajeng Widarini 73
Gyesook Yoo 74
Marta Zatková 35
Maja Zupančič 75
13
 
North Star Alliance, Kampala, Uganda
14
 
Department of Psychology, Franklin and Marshall College
29
 
Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (CIS-IUL)
32
 
Psychology Department, Universidad Latina de Costa Rica
35
 
Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Department of Psychological Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University
41
 
Psychology Department, University of Crete
44
 
Department of Psychology, Islamabad Model College for Boys, F-10/4, Islamabad
45
 
Department of Economics, Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Mating, University of Amsterdam
58
 
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
60
 
Institute of Psychology, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro
61
 
Department of Psychology, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Universitatea Nationala de Arta Teatrala si Cinematografica-Centrul Internațional de Cercetare şi Educație în Tehnologii Inovativ Creative (UNATC-CINETIc), Romanian Academy
64
 
Delve Business Network, Islamabad, Pakistan
65
 
School of Psychology, University of Monterrey
69
 
Department of Management Sciences, DHA Suffa University
73
 
Faculty of Communication, University Prof. Dr Moestopo (Beragama), Jakarta, 10270, Indonesia
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-03-20
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.500
CiteScore9.7
Impact factor5.1
ISSN09567976, 14679280
General Psychology
Abstract

Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives—an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective—offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample ( N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Archives of Sexual Behavior
23 publications, 10.6%
Personality and Individual Differences
15 publications, 6.91%
Evolution and Human Behavior
14 publications, 6.45%
Frontiers in Psychology
13 publications, 5.99%
Evolutionary Psychology
11 publications, 5.07%
Evolutionary Psychological Science
7 publications, 3.23%
Scientific Reports
6 publications, 2.76%
Journal of Sex Research
4 publications, 1.84%
Human Nature
4 publications, 1.84%
Current Psychology
4 publications, 1.84%
Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences
4 publications, 1.84%
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
3 publications, 1.38%
Sexuality and Culture
3 publications, 1.38%
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
3 publications, 1.38%
Journal of Research in Personality
3 publications, 1.38%
Heliyon
3 publications, 1.38%
PLoS ONE
3 publications, 1.38%
Personal Relationships
3 publications, 1.38%
Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle
2 publications, 0.92%
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
2 publications, 0.92%
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
2 publications, 0.92%
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
2 publications, 0.92%
Current Opinion in Psychology
2 publications, 0.92%
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2 publications, 0.92%
European Journal of Personality
2 publications, 0.92%
Population Research and Policy Review
1 publication, 0.46%
Social Psychological and Personality Science
1 publication, 0.46%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 0.46%
Sexes
1 publication, 0.46%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Springer Nature
66 publications, 30.41%
Elsevier
43 publications, 19.82%
SAGE
22 publications, 10.14%
Frontiers Media S.A.
15 publications, 6.91%
Taylor & Francis
11 publications, 5.07%
Oxford University Press
10 publications, 4.61%
Wiley
8 publications, 3.69%
The Royal Society
5 publications, 2.3%
American Psychological Association (APA)
5 publications, 2.3%
Cambridge University Press
4 publications, 1.84%
Akademiai Kiado
3 publications, 1.38%
MDPI
3 publications, 1.38%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 1.38%
China Science Publishing & Media
1 publication, 0.46%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.46%
Intellect
1 publication, 0.46%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.46%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.46%
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 publication, 0.46%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.46%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
217
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Walter K. V. et al. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication // Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 31. No. 4. pp. 408-423.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Walter K. V. et al. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication // Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 31. No. 4. pp. 408-423.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Walter,
author = {Kathryn V. Walter and Daniel Conroy-Beam and David M. Buss and Kelly Asao and Agnieszka Sorokowska and Piotr Sorokowski and Toivo Aavik and Grace Akello and Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba and Charlotte Alm and Naumana Amjad and Afifa Anjum and Chiemezie S. Atama and Derya Atamtürk Duyar and Richard Ayebare and Carlota Batres and Mons Bendixen and Aicha Bensafia and Boris Bizumic and Mahmoud Boussena and Marina Butovskaya and Seda Can and Katarzyna Cantarero and Antonin Carrier and Hakan Cetinkaya and Ilona Croy and Rosa María Cueto and Marcin Czub and Daria Dronova and Seda Dural and Izzet Duyar and Berna Ertugrul and Agustín Espinosa and Ignacio Estevan and Carla Sofia Esteves and Luxi Fang and Tomasz Frackowiak and Jorge Contreras Garduño and Karina Ugalde González and Farida Guemaz and Petra Gyuris and Mária Halamová and Iskra Herak and Marina Horvat and Ivana Hromatko and Chin-Ming Hui and Jas Laile Jaafar and Feng Jiang and Konstantinos Kafetsios and Tina Kavčič and others},
title = {Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication},
journal = {Psychological Science},
year = {2020},
volume = {31},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154},
number = {4},
pages = {408--423},
doi = {10.1177/0956797620904154}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Walter, Kathryn V., et al. “Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication.” Psychological Science, vol. 31, no. 4, Mar. 2020, pp. 408-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154.