Grigoryev, Dmitry S
PhD in Psychology
🥼
🥼
Dmitry can become your supervisor
If you would like to work under his/her guidance, please write a message or contact him/her on social media.
<a href="https://colab.ws/login" target="_blank">Authorization</a> required.
🤝
🤝
Dmitry is looking for opportunities for scientific collaboration
If you would like to do joint research with him/her, write a message or contact him/her on social media.
<a href="https://colab.ws/login" target="_blank">Authorization</a> required.
Publications
81
Citations
806
h-index
17
- Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology (1)
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (1)
- Affective Science (1)
- Applied Psychology (2)
- Asian Journal of Social Psychology (1)
- British Journal of Psychology (1)
- Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii) (1)
- Cross-Cultural Research (1)
- Cultural-Historical Psychology (3)
- Current Psychology (1)
- Education and Self Development (1)
- Europe's Journal of Psychology (1)
- Evolution and Human Behavior (1)
- Frontiers in Psychology (2)
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations (3)
- International Journal of Social Psychiatry (1)
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (1)
- Journal of Intercultural Communication Research (2)
- Journal of International Migration and Integration (1)
- Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (1)
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1)
- Journal of the Belarusian State University Sociology (1)
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence (1)
- Mental Health, Religion and Culture (1)
- National Psychological Journal (1)
- Nature Human Behaviour (2)
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2)
- Personality and Individual Differences (2)
- PLoS ONE (2)
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2)
- Psychological Reports (2)
- Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics (1)
- RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics (4)
- Science advances (1)
- Scientific data (2)
- Scientific Reports (2)
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass (1)
- Social Psychology and Society (3)
- Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia (1)
- Spanish Journal of Psychology (1)
- Transcultural Psychiatry (1)
- Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology) (1)
- Российский психологический журнал (1)
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Gallyamova A., Komyaginskaya E., Vasyunina A., Grigoryev D.
This study investigates the links between life history strategy (LHS), IQ, and individualism/collectivism (IND/COL) across Russian regions. It is the first to examine regional differences in LHS, illustrating how biological trade-offs are linked to cultural values within a country and separately considering the role of cognitive abilities in this relationship. We hypothesize that cultural differences between regions can be understood through human behavioral ecology, specifically the trade-offs associated with LHS. Data from 83 Russian regions were used to create indices for slow LHS (sLHS) and IND/COL. The sLHS index included indicators like teenage fertility rates, rates of third or higher births, average height, educational attainment, and interest in human sexual behavior (using Google Trends data). The IND/COL index was constructed from indicators like the proportion of multigenerational and single-person households, divorce rates, and search data indicating ingroup identity expression. Regional IQ scores were derived from a large-scale online test administered to over 230.000 individuals across these regions. Our findings reveal strong positive correlations between sLHS, IQ, and IND/COL across Russian regions. Mediation analysis suggests that IQ likely fully mediates the relationship between sLHS and IND/COL. Geographical analysis showed clear patterns of spatial clustering, with gradients linked to latitude and altitude. Additionally, five latent regional profiles emerged from the data, indicating distinct patterns among the regions. These results, while acknowledging certain limitations, underscore the importance of LHS in understanding regional cultural differences. They also point to the need for Russian social policies to adapt to the unique characteristics of each region.
Cologna V., Mede N.G., Berger S., Besley J., Brick C., Joubert M., Maibach E.W., Mihelj S., Oreskes N., Schäfer M.S., van der Linden S., Abdul Aziz N.I., Abdulsalam S., Shamsi N.A., Aczel B., et. al.
Abstract
Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most people trust scientists and agree that scientists should engage more in society and policymaking. We found variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual- and country-level variables, including political orientation. While there is no widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists.
Mede N.G., Cologna V., Berger S., Besley J., Brick C., Joubert M., Maibach E.W., Mihelj S., Oreskes N., Schäfer M.S., van der Linden S., Abdul Aziz N.I., Abdulsalam S., Shamsi N.A., Aczel B., et. al.
Abstract
Science is integral to society because it can inform individual, government, corporate, and civil society decision-making on issues such as public health, new technologies or climate change. Yet, public distrust and populist sentiment challenge the relationship between science and society. To help researchers analyse the science-society nexus across different geographical and cultural contexts, we undertook a cross-sectional population survey resulting in a dataset of 71,922 participants in 68 countries. The data were collected between November 2022 and August 2023 as part of the global Many Labs study “Trust in Science and Science-Related Populism” (TISP). The questionnaire contained comprehensive measures for individuals’ trust in scientists, science-related populist attitudes, perceptions of the role of science in society, science media use and communication behaviour, attitudes to climate change and support for environmental policies, personality traits, political and religious views and demographic characteristics. Here, we describe the dataset, survey materials and psychometric properties of key variables. We encourage researchers to use this unique dataset for global comparative analyses on public perceptions of science and its role in society and policy-making.
Eastwick P.W., Sparks J., Finkel E.J., Meza E.M., Adamkovič M., Adu P., Ai T., Akintola A.A., Al-Shawaf L., Apriliawati D., Arriaga P., Aubert-Teillaud B., Baník G., Barzykowski K., Batres C., et. al.
Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several problems. First, articles exhibit discrepant analytic and reporting practices. Second, different findings emerge across laboratories worldwide, perhaps because they sample different relationship contexts and/or populations. This registered report-partnered with the Psychological Science Accelerator-uses a highly powered design (
Godovanets A., Monahhova E., Komyaginskaya E., Gallyamova A., Grigoryev D.
Increasing evidence links cultural influences on brain activity to various cognitive and affective processes, necessitating an integrative framework to account for the dynamic interplay between culture, behavior, and neural function. The mechanisms of cooperation and social conformity within culture exhibit variable interdependence across contexts, manifested by distinct neural patterns. To address the isolated examination of these mechanisms, we propose a NeuroCultural Interdependence Model delineating four modes (competitive interdependence, conditional interdependence, selective interdependence, communal interdependence) characterized by specific neural signatures and behavioral tendencies within cultural contexts. These modes represent varying degrees of interdependence, elucidating how individuals interact and rely upon others in their cultural milieu. The framework posits a direct linkage between cultural orientations and neural activity, offering a novel perspective on culture’s internalization and manifestation at the individual level, underscoring its embeddedness within neural processes influencing cognitive, affective, and behavioral inclinations in relation to others. Crucially, our proposed model highlights an isomorphic relationship between cultural orientations and their corresponding neural structures. It demonstrates that the mechanisms of cooperation and social conformity function concurrently at both the cultural and neural levels, revealing a direct parallel in how these elements operate. We conclude by providing recommendations for future elaboration and empirical validation of our model to be conducted using advanced neuroimaging techniques.
Doell K.C., Todorova B., Vlasceanu M., Bak Coleman J.B., Pronizius E., Schumann P., Azevedo F., Patel Y., Berkebile-Wineberg M.M., Brick C., Lange F., Grayson S.J., Pei Y., Chakroff A., van den Broek K.L., et. al.
AbstractClimate change is currently one of humanity’s greatest threats. To help scholars understand the psychology of climate change, we conducted an online quasi-experimental survey on 59,508 participants from 63 countries (collected between July 2022 and July 2023). In a between-subjects design, we tested 11 interventions designed to promote climate change mitigation across four outcomes: climate change belief, support for climate policies, willingness to share information on social media, and performance on an effortful pro-environmental behavioural task. Participants also reported their demographic information (e.g., age, gender) and several other independent variables (e.g., political orientation, perceptions about the scientific consensus). In the no-intervention control group, we also measured important additional variables, such as environmentalist identity and trust in climate science. We report the collaboration procedure, study design, raw and cleaned data, all survey materials, relevant analysis scripts, and data visualisations. This dataset can be used to further the understanding of psychological, demographic, and national-level factors related to individual-level climate action and how these differ across countries.
Yang X., Schulz J.F., Schmidt K., Kenny A.R., Pfuhl G., Gjoneska B., Dalgar I., Lewis S.C., Exner A., Buchanan E.M., Lander K., Becker M., Du H., Johri A., Selcuk E., et. al.
Biases in favor of culturally prevalent social ingroups are ubiquitous, but random assignment to arbitrary experimentally created social groups is also sufficient to create ingroup biases (i.e., the minimal group effect; MGE). The extent to which ingroup bias arises from specific social contexts versus more general psychological tendencies remains unclear. This registered report focuses on three questions. First, how culturally prevalent is the MGE? Second, how do critical cultural and individual factors moderate its strength? Third, does the MGE meaningfully relate to culturally salient real-world ingroup biases? We compare the MGE to bias in favor of a family member (first cousin) and a national ingroup member. We propose to recruit a sample of > 200 participants in each of > 50 nations to examine these questions and advance our understanding of the psychological foundations and cultural prevalence of ingroup bias.
Adu P., Mbinta J., Badu Prempeh A.S., Grigoryev D., Jurcik T.
AbstractWhile health research has demonstrated the influence of cultural disparities on health outcomes, the impact of ambivalent sexism on mental health help-seeking has not been well understood. We investigated the links between sexist attitudes, Mental Health Literacy (MHL), and sociodemographic variables regarding symptoms of Social Anxiety among Ghanaians. In 2021, we recruited 601 Ghanaians to participate in an online vignette-based experimental study. Respondents were randomly assigned to two conditions (i.e., male, and female vignettes) depicting symptoms of Social Anxiety for a hypothetical person. Participants provided their impression of the hypothetical person and further completed self-report measures. Regarding help-seeking for the symptoms of Social Anxiety, results revealed that age positively predicted professional help-seeking among men assigned to the male condition, while age negatively predicted social support among women in the same condition. Education was found to relate positively to professional and social support help-seeking options but was negatively linked with spiritual help-seeking. Benevolent sexist attitudes towards women related to the endorsement of professional help-seeking, but participants with benevolent sexist attitudes towards men were less likely to recommend social support. Findings imply that optimal interventions for mental health could benefit from understanding help-seeking patterns, idioms of psychological distress and the cultural settings of individuals.
Vlasceanu M., Doell K.C., Bak-Coleman J.B., Todorova B., Berkebile-Weinberg M.M., Grayson S.J., Patel Y., Goldwert D., Pei Y., Chakroff A., Pronizius E., van den Broek K.L., Vlasceanu D., Constantino S., Morais M.J., et. al.
Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.
Pazhoohi F., Afhami R., Chegeni R., Dubrov D., Gałasińska K., Garza R., Moharrampour N.G., Grigoryev D., Kowal M., Pallesen S., Pfuhl G.
Body size and shape are sexually dimorphic in humans, with men being characterized with larger upper bodies, while women typically having broader pelvises. Such sexually dimorphic traits, quantified as shoulder to hip ratio (SHR) in men and waist to hip ratio (WHR) in women, serve as cues of an individual’s genetic fitness, reproductive potential, health, and resource holding power, and, thereby, functioning as attractiveness cues to the opposite sex. In the current study, we investigated men’s and women’s preference for the opposite sex body shape (WHR in women and SHR in men) in samples from Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia. Women rated their preference for men’s SHR (1.20 to 1.50) and men rated their preference for women’s WHR (0.55 − 0.85). Our results showed that Iranian and Norwegian men preferred less feminine WHRs in women compared to Polish and Russian men. Moreover, Iranian women preferred less masculine SHRs in men than women from other countries. Altogether, the current research showed that there are variations in men’s preferences for women’s WHR and women’s preferences for men’s SHR among these countries.
Vaidis D.C., Sleegers W.W., van Leeuwen F., DeMarree K.G., Sætrevik B., Ross R.M., Schmidt K., Protzko J., Morvinski C., Ghasemi O., Roberts A.J., Stone J., Bran A., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A., Gunsoy C., et. al.
According to cognitive-dissonance theory, performing counterattitudinal behavior produces a state of dissonance that people are motivated to resolve, usually by changing their attitude to be in line with their behavior. One of the most popular experimental paradigms used to produce such attitude change is the induced-compliance paradigm. Despite its popularity, the replication crisis in social psychology and other fields, as well as methodological limitations associated with the paradigm, raise concerns about the robustness of classic studies in this literature. We therefore conducted a multilab constructive replication of the induced-compliance paradigm based on Croyle and Cooper (Experiment 1). In a total of 39 labs from 19 countries and 14 languages, participants ( N = 4,898) were assigned to one of three conditions: writing a counterattitudinal essay under high choice, writing a counterattitudinal essay under low choice, or writing a neutral essay under high choice. The primary analyses failed to support the core hypothesis: No significant difference in attitude was observed after writing a counterattitudinal essay under high choice compared with low choice. However, we did observe a significant difference in attitude after writing a counterattitudinal essay compared with writing a neutral essay. Secondary analyses revealed the pattern of results to be robust to data exclusions, lab variability, and attitude assessment. Additional exploratory analyses were conducted to test predictions from cognitive-dissonance theory. Overall, the results call into question whether the induced-compliance paradigm provides robust evidence for cognitive dissonance.
Nothing found, try to update filter.
O’Reilly S., Griffiths J., Fox L., Weadick C.S., My Oo N., Murphy L., O’Leary R., Goulioti T., Adam V., Razis E.D., Lindholm B., Werustsky G., Cameron D., Bliss J.

Gallyamova A., Komyaginskaya E., Vasyunina A., Grigoryev D.
This study investigates the links between life history strategy (LHS), IQ, and individualism/collectivism (IND/COL) across Russian regions. It is the first to examine regional differences in LHS, illustrating how biological trade-offs are linked to cultural values within a country and separately considering the role of cognitive abilities in this relationship. We hypothesize that cultural differences between regions can be understood through human behavioral ecology, specifically the trade-offs associated with LHS. Data from 83 Russian regions were used to create indices for slow LHS (sLHS) and IND/COL. The sLHS index included indicators like teenage fertility rates, rates of third or higher births, average height, educational attainment, and interest in human sexual behavior (using Google Trends data). The IND/COL index was constructed from indicators like the proportion of multigenerational and single-person households, divorce rates, and search data indicating ingroup identity expression. Regional IQ scores were derived from a large-scale online test administered to over 230.000 individuals across these regions. Our findings reveal strong positive correlations between sLHS, IQ, and IND/COL across Russian regions. Mediation analysis suggests that IQ likely fully mediates the relationship between sLHS and IND/COL. Geographical analysis showed clear patterns of spatial clustering, with gradients linked to latitude and altitude. Additionally, five latent regional profiles emerged from the data, indicating distinct patterns among the regions. These results, while acknowledging certain limitations, underscore the importance of LHS in understanding regional cultural differences. They also point to the need for Russian social policies to adapt to the unique characteristics of each region.


Kallergi A., Landeweerd L.
Abstract
Science activism is often seen as a threat to scientific credibility. Yet, an increasing number of scientists participate in climate activism and challenge the morality of remaining passive when urgent action is needed. Science activism for climate action (SACA) raises intriguing questions about the source of scientific credibility and the boundaries of a scientist’s professional role responsibility. This contribution informs discussions over (the appropriateness of) SACA by explicating different conceptualizations of this phenomenon. Arguments for SACA are used to formulate three conceptual configurations that assume different relations between the role of the scientist and the role of the activist: the scientist activist as a citizen; the scientist activist as a privileged citizen; the scientist activist as a professional. To better situate these configurations, we consider the perspectives of scientists with a direct or indirect involvement in climate action. Secondary sources of empirical nature (interviews with scientist activists; proceedings of a workshop with early-career researchers) enrich our analysis with the practitioners’ reasoning over science activism, its relation to their profession, and its relation to scientific credibility. Eventually, we reflect on the implications of each configuration for the embedding of science activism in scientific conduct.

Nothing found, try to update filter.
Cologna V., Mede N.G., Berger S., Besley J., Brick C., Joubert M., Maibach E.W., Mihelj S., Oreskes N., Schäfer M.S., van der Linden S., Abdul Aziz N.I., Abdulsalam S., Shamsi N.A., Aczel B., et. al.
Abstract
Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most people trust scientists and agree that scientists should engage more in society and policymaking. We found variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual- and country-level variables, including political orientation. While there is no widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists.
Mede N.G., Cologna V., Berger S., Besley J., Brick C., Joubert M., Maibach E.W., Mihelj S., Oreskes N., Schäfer M.S., van der Linden S., Abdul Aziz N.I., Abdulsalam S., Shamsi N.A., Aczel B., et. al.
Abstract
Science is integral to society because it can inform individual, government, corporate, and civil society decision-making on issues such as public health, new technologies or climate change. Yet, public distrust and populist sentiment challenge the relationship between science and society. To help researchers analyse the science-society nexus across different geographical and cultural contexts, we undertook a cross-sectional population survey resulting in a dataset of 71,922 participants in 68 countries. The data were collected between November 2022 and August 2023 as part of the global Many Labs study “Trust in Science and Science-Related Populism” (TISP). The questionnaire contained comprehensive measures for individuals’ trust in scientists, science-related populist attitudes, perceptions of the role of science in society, science media use and communication behaviour, attitudes to climate change and support for environmental policies, personality traits, political and religious views and demographic characteristics. Here, we describe the dataset, survey materials and psychometric properties of key variables. We encourage researchers to use this unique dataset for global comparative analyses on public perceptions of science and its role in society and policy-making.
Reif A., Taddicken M., Guenther L., Schröder J.T., Weingart P.
We developed and validated the Public Trust in Science (PuTruS) Scale to recognize the multidimensional nature of the concept. Drawing on an epistemic understanding of trust in science as a perception, we integrate prior research on different levels of trust objects, emphasizing the importance of trust in scientists. In addition, we include transparency and dialogue orientation to reflect increased public engagement expectations. Data from two German online panel surveys ( nW1 = 3,439; nW2 = 1,030) points toward a five-dimensional structure (expertise, integrity, benevolence, transparency, dialogue orientation). For external validation, we used deference to scientific authority, conspiracy beliefs, and science populism.
Gallyamova A., Miller D.T.
This study explores the relationship between Russian citizens’ self-reported political engagement and their system justification beliefs, perceptions of the system justification beliefs of other citizens, and perceptions of their community culture. We assessed personal political engagement through self-reported past behavior of 1,143 participants. The results revealed a negative relationship between individual personal system justification scores and political engagement. However, the analyses suggested that this relationship emerged because of pluralistic ignorance among the citizenry—their tendency to assume that others hold stronger system justification beliefs than they do. This possibility seemed especially likely among those who perceived themselves to inhabit vertical collectivist communities. These results suggest that beliefs about the system justification beliefs of others ( second-order beliefs) may shape personal system justification beliefs ( first-order beliefs). More generally, the findings emphasize the substantial role of cultural factors in political engagement in Russia.
Koljević S.
A recent study has found that Polish territories with history of forced population displacement exhibit a faster life history compared to other Polish territories. Whether the spatial overlap between historical forced population displacement and faster life history represents a common pattern or merely an isolated phenomenon remains to be seen. Czechia provides an avenue to test this, since its borderlands (specifically the so-called Sudetenland) were mainly inhabited by a German-speaking population who were forcefully displaced post-WWII. Differences in life history speed amongst Czech districts were estimated based on multiple life history indicators via a factor analysis. Faster life history for Sudetenland is confirmed, a pattern consistent across numerous life history indicators. The spatial overlap between fast life history and population displacement (herein dubbed the r-displacement distribution) might be contingent on stable socioeconomic environment, potentially limiting its generality beyond socioeconomically developed societies. Further replications of r-displacement distribution might be needed to confirm its generality.
Stott I., Salguero-Gómez R., Jones O.R., Ezard T.H., Gamelon M., Lachish S., Lebreton J., Simmonds E.G., Gaillard J., Hodgson D.J.
Life history strategies, which combine schedules of survival, development, and reproduction, shape how natural selection acts on species' heritable traits and organismal fitness. Comparative analyses have historically ranked life histories along a fast-slow continuum, describing a negative association between time allocation to reproduction and development versus survival. However, higher-quality, more representative data and analyses have revealed that life history variation cannot be fully accounted for by this single continuum. Moreover, studies often do not test predictions from existing theories and instead operate as exploratory exercises. To move forward, we offer three recommendations for future investigations: standardizing life history traits, overcoming taxonomic siloes, and using theory to move from describing to understanding life history variation across the Tree of Life.
Woodley of Menie M.A., Fieder M., Sarraf M.A., Peñaherrera-Aguirre M.
It has been argued that reduced inbreeding depression and associated increased heterosis (hybrid vigor), due to greater gene flow between human subpopulations, is the cause of the Flynn effect (rising IQ-test performance over time). Using genotypic data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, three estimates of genome-wide runs of homozygosity (ROH) are generated for a subsample of unrelated individuals of European descent. These estimates are used in a between-generation regression model to predict offspring advantage over parents in educational attainment (EA; years of schooling). After controlling for a variety of covariates, it is found that a variable combining both the numbers and lengths of ROH is a statistically significant positive predictor of the offspring EA advantage. Maternal, rather than paternal, differences are found to drive the effect when these parental influences are examined separately. Since the heterosis hypothesis (HH) explicitly predicts that this analysis would yield the opposite finding, the result constitutes substantial evidence against the HH. By contrast, the life history model of the Flynn effect (LHM) satisfactorily explains the current findings, positing that slowing life history speed increases maternal investment (MI) into offspring exhibiting greater coefficients of genetic relatedness as a means of raising inclusive fitness. According to the LHM, the Flynn effect stems, at least in part, from MI enhancing opportunities for the cultivation of narrow cognitive abilities (e.g., through greater exposure to highly predictable environments, such as in good schools). The significant independent effect of assortative mating observed here is also consistent with the LHM, as are other patterns found in these data.
Adu P., Mbinta J., Badu Prempeh A.S., Grigoryev D., Jurcik T.
AbstractWhile health research has demonstrated the influence of cultural disparities on health outcomes, the impact of ambivalent sexism on mental health help-seeking has not been well understood. We investigated the links between sexist attitudes, Mental Health Literacy (MHL), and sociodemographic variables regarding symptoms of Social Anxiety among Ghanaians. In 2021, we recruited 601 Ghanaians to participate in an online vignette-based experimental study. Respondents were randomly assigned to two conditions (i.e., male, and female vignettes) depicting symptoms of Social Anxiety for a hypothetical person. Participants provided their impression of the hypothetical person and further completed self-report measures. Regarding help-seeking for the symptoms of Social Anxiety, results revealed that age positively predicted professional help-seeking among men assigned to the male condition, while age negatively predicted social support among women in the same condition. Education was found to relate positively to professional and social support help-seeking options but was negatively linked with spiritual help-seeking. Benevolent sexist attitudes towards women related to the endorsement of professional help-seeking, but participants with benevolent sexist attitudes towards men were less likely to recommend social support. Findings imply that optimal interventions for mental health could benefit from understanding help-seeking patterns, idioms of psychological distress and the cultural settings of individuals.
Cologna V., Kotcher J., Mede N.G., Besley J., Maibach E.W., Oreskes N.
Trust in climate science provides the foundation for evidence-based policymaking on climate change mitigation and adaptation and public perceptions of the urgency of climate change. Here we consider the possibility that lack of public trust in climate science and climate scientists may undermine the effectiveness of climate science communication. To this end, we narratively review three topics of relevance to climate science and climate scientists: 1) The current state of trust; 2) Reasons for distrust; 3) How political engagement affects trust. We then draw on insights from communication and behavioral science to recommend how climate change communicators can become more trustworthy.
Berkebile-Weinberg M., Goldwert D., Doell K.C., Van Bavel J.J., Vlasceanu M.
AbstractA major barrier to climate change mitigation is the political polarization of climate change beliefs. In a global experiment conducted in 60 countries (N = 51,224), we assess the differential impact of eleven climate interventions across the ideological divide. At baseline, we find political polarization of climate change beliefs and policy support globally, with people who reported being liberal believing and supporting climate policy more than those who reported being conservative (Cohen’s d = 0.35 and 0.27, respectively). However, we find no evidence for a statistically significant difference between these groups in their engagement in a behavioral tree planting task. This conceptual-behavioral polarization incongruence results from self-identified conservatives acting despite not believing, rather than self-identified liberals not acting on their beliefs. We also find three interventions (emphasizing effective collective actions, writing a letter to a future generation member, and writing a letter from the future self) boost climate beliefs and policy support across the ideological spectrum, and one intervention (emphasizing scientific consensus) stimulates the climate action of people identifying as liberal. None of the interventions tested show evidence for a statistically significant boost in climate action for self-identified conservatives. We discuss implications for practitioners deploying targeted climate interventions.
Total publications
81
Total citations
806
Citations per publication
9.95
Average publications per year
7.36
Average coauthors
82.57
Publications years
2015-2025 (11 years)
h-index
17
i10-index
27
m-index
1.55
o-index
38
g-index
25
w-index
4
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Social Psychology
|
Social Psychology, 15, 18.52%
Social Psychology
15 publications, 18.52%
|
General Psychology
|
General Psychology, 10, 12.35%
General Psychology
10 publications, 12.35%
|
Applied Psychology
|
Applied Psychology, 10, 12.35%
Applied Psychology
10 publications, 12.35%
|
Cultural Studies
|
Cultural Studies, 8, 9.88%
Cultural Studies
8 publications, 9.88%
|
Multidisciplinary
|
Multidisciplinary, 7, 8.64%
Multidisciplinary
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Developmental and Educational Psychology
|
Developmental and Educational Psychology, 6, 7.41%
Developmental and Educational Psychology
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Education
|
Education, 6, 7.41%
Education
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Sociology and Political Science
|
Sociology and Political Science, 5, 6.17%
Sociology and Political Science
5 publications, 6.17%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 4, 4.94%
General Medicine
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
|
Social Sciences (miscellaneous), 4, 4.94%
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
|
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4, 4.94%
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
|
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), 4, 4.94%
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Psychology (miscellaneous)
|
Psychology (miscellaneous), 4, 4.94%
Psychology (miscellaneous)
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Psychiatry and Mental health
|
Psychiatry and Mental health, 3, 3.7%
Psychiatry and Mental health
3 publications, 3.7%
|
Business and International Management
|
Business and International Management, 3, 3.7%
Business and International Management
3 publications, 3.7%
|
Behavioral Neuroscience
|
Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 3.7%
Behavioral Neuroscience
3 publications, 3.7%
|
General Environmental Science
|
General Environmental Science, 2, 2.47%
General Environmental Science
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Linguistics and Language
|
Linguistics and Language, 2, 2.47%
Linguistics and Language
2 publications, 2.47%
|
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
|
General Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2, 2.47%
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Anthropology
|
Anthropology, 2, 2.47%
Anthropology
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 2, 2.47%
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Communication
|
Communication, 2, 2.47%
Communication
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 1, 1.23%
Computer Science Applications
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Statistics and Probability
|
Statistics and Probability, 1, 1.23%
Statistics and Probability
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Clinical Psychology
|
Clinical Psychology, 1, 1.23%
Clinical Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Library and Information Sciences
|
Library and Information Sciences, 1, 1.23%
Library and Information Sciences
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Information Systems
|
Information Systems, 1, 1.23%
Information Systems
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Physiology
|
Physiology, 1, 1.23%
Physiology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
|
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1, 1.23%
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
|
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 1, 1.23%
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Political Science and International Relations
|
Political Science and International Relations, 1, 1.23%
Political Science and International Relations
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Language and Linguistics
|
Language and Linguistics, 1, 1.23%
Language and Linguistics
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Development
|
Development, 1, 1.23%
Development
1 publication, 1.23%
|
General Social Sciences
|
General Social Sciences, 1, 1.23%
General Social Sciences
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Health (social science)
|
Health (social science), 1, 1.23%
Health (social science)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Demography
|
Demography, 1, 1.23%
Demography
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Journals
1
2
3
4
|
|
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
4 publications, 4.94%
|
|
Scientific data
3 publications, 3.7%
|
|
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
3 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Nature Human Behaviour
3 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Cultural-Historical Psychology
3 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Social Psychology and Society
3 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Psychological Reports
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Scientific Reports
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Applied Psychology
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of International Migration and Integration
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Mental Health, Religion and Culture
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Mental Health and Prevention
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Education and Self Development
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Asian Journal of Social Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Current Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Spanish Journal of Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Cross-Cultural Research
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Psychology in Russia: State of the Art
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Transcultural Psychiatry
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Evolution and Human Behavior
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Europe's Journal of Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Science advances
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
British Journal of Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Affective Science
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Российский психологический журнал
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Population and Economics
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of the Belarusian State University Sociology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
National Psychological Journal
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Show all (17 more) | |
1
2
3
4
|
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
66 citations, 8.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
40 citations, 4.92%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 27, 3.32%
Journal not defined
27 citations, 3.32%
|
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
16 citations, 1.97%
|
|
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
16 citations, 1.97%
|
|
PLoS ONE
13 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Current Psychology
12 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Journal of International Migration and Integration
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Royal Society Open Science
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Scientific Reports
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Sustainability
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Social Psychology and Society
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Communications Psychology
10 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Psychology
9 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
9 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Psychological Reports
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Nature Human Behaviour
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Europe's Journal of Psychology
8 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Scientific data
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Asian Journal of Social Psychology
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Cultural-Historical Psychology
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Applied Psychology
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
British Journal of Psychology
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
International Journal of Psychology
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Archives of Sexual Behavior
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Psychology and Developing Societies
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Cross-Cultural Research
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of the Belarusian State University Sociology
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Mental Health and Prevention
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Revista de Psicologia Social
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
PNAS Nexus
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Psychological Science and Education
4 citations, 0.49%
|
|
British Journal of Social Psychology
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Social Psychology of Education
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
European Journal of Developmental Psychology
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Vaccine
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Cognitive Therapy and Research
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Food Quality and Preference
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Cognition and Emotion
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
European Journal of Social Psychology
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Infant and Child Development
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Scientific Studies of Reading
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Heliyon
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Research Integrity and Peer Review
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
npj Climate Action
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Population and Economics
3 citations, 0.37%
|
|
European Review of Social Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Judgment and Decision Making
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Applied Linguistics Review
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nature Climate Change
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Perspectives on Psychological Science
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nature Communications
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Psychiatry
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Memory and Language
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Race and Social Problems
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Social Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Review of Social Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of World Business
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Language and Culture
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Annual Review of Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nature
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Health Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Political Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Spanish Journal of Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cogent Social Sciences
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Intercultural Studies
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Comparative Migration Studies
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Evolution and Human Behavior
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Irish Educational Studies
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Climatic Change
2 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Springer Nature
13 publications, 16.05%
|
|
Elsevier
10 publications, 12.35%
|
|
SAGE
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Wiley
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 4.94%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
4 publications, 4.94%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
2 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Europe's Journal of Psychology
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Akademizdatcenter Nauka
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Belarusian State University
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Credo, LTD.
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
International Foundation for the Support of Social Research and Education Intersozic
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
Russian Psychological Society
1 publication, 1.23%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Organizations from articles
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
50 publications, 61.73%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 27, 33.33%
Organization not defined
27 publications, 33.33%
|
Tilburg University
13 publications, 16.05%
|
|
University of Bergen
11 publications, 13.58%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
11 publications, 13.58%
|
|
SWPS University
11 publications, 13.58%
|
|
Macquarie University
10 publications, 12.35%
|
|
Witten/Herdecke University
10 publications, 12.35%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
10 publications, 12.35%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
10 publications, 12.35%
|
|
University of New South Wales
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
Charles University
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
University of Queensland
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
La Trobe University
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
Harvard University
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
University of Vienna
9 publications, 11.11%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Haifa
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Cambridge
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Aarhus University
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Oslo
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Birmingham
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Warsaw
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Wrocław
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Comenius University Bratislava
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
University of Silesia in Katowice
8 publications, 9.88%
|
|
Uskudar University
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
Ghent University
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Lisbon
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Zurich
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
Stanford University
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
New York University
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
Utrecht University
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Porto
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Limerick
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
University of Virginia
7 publications, 8.64%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Tübingen
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Cyprus
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Stockholm University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Bern
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Oxford
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Padua
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Michigan State University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Auckland
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of the Philippines Diliman
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Crete
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Bristol
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of St Andrews
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Minnesota
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Hildesheim
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Kyushu University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
University of Delaware
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Nicolaus Copernicus University
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Prague University of Economics and Business
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Universidade de Brasília
6 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Turku
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Durham University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
King's College London
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Western Australia
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Leiden University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Wuppertal
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Waseda University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Belgrade
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Essex
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Prešov
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of São Paulo
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
University of Zadar
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Singapore Management University
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Universidad de Sonora
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu-Alike
5 publications, 6.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|
Countries from articles
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 51, 62.96%
Russia
51 publications, 62.96%
|
USA
|
USA, 28, 34.57%
USA
28 publications, 34.57%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 24, 29.63%
Country not defined
24 publications, 29.63%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 23, 28.4%
Netherlands
23 publications, 28.4%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 22, 27.16%
Australia
22 publications, 27.16%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 20, 24.69%
Canada
20 publications, 24.69%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 18, 22.22%
United Kingdom
18 publications, 22.22%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 18, 22.22%
New Zealand
18 publications, 22.22%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 16, 19.75%
Belgium
16 publications, 19.75%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 15, 18.52%
Spain
15 publications, 18.52%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 15, 18.52%
Poland
15 publications, 18.52%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 14, 17.28%
Germany
14 publications, 17.28%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 14, 17.28%
Austria
14 publications, 17.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 14, 17.28%
Norway
14 publications, 17.28%
|
France
|
France, 12, 14.81%
France
12 publications, 14.81%
|
China
|
China, 12, 14.81%
China
12 publications, 14.81%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 12, 14.81%
Portugal
12 publications, 14.81%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 12, 14.81%
Brazil
12 publications, 14.81%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 12, 14.81%
Switzerland
12 publications, 14.81%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 12, 14.81%
Sweden
12 publications, 14.81%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 13.58%
Israel
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 13.58%
Ireland
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 11, 13.58%
Slovakia
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 13.58%
Turkey
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 11, 13.58%
Finland
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 11, 13.58%
Czech Republic
11 publications, 13.58%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 10, 12.35%
Denmark
10 publications, 12.35%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 12.35%
Italy
10 publications, 12.35%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 10, 12.35%
Japan
10 publications, 12.35%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 9, 11.11%
Singapore
9 publications, 11.11%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 9, 11.11%
Chile
9 publications, 11.11%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 8, 9.88%
Argentina
8 publications, 9.88%
|
India
|
India, 8, 9.88%
India
8 publications, 9.88%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 8, 9.88%
Cyprus
8 publications, 9.88%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 8, 9.88%
Serbia
8 publications, 9.88%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 9.88%
Philippines
8 publications, 9.88%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 7, 8.64%
Indonesia
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 8.64%
Iran
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 7, 8.64%
Kenya
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 8.64%
Colombia
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 8.64%
Nigeria
7 publications, 8.64%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 7, 8.64%
UAE
7 publications, 8.64%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 7, 8.64%
North Macedonia
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 8.64%
Thailand
7 publications, 8.64%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 6, 7.41%
Ukraine
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 6, 7.41%
Bulgaria
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 7.41%
Hungary
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 7.41%
Greece
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 6, 7.41%
Malaysia
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 6, 7.41%
Morocco
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 6, 7.41%
Peru
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 6, 7.41%
Romania
6 publications, 7.41%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 6.17%
Mexico
5 publications, 6.17%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 6.17%
Pakistan
5 publications, 6.17%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 5, 6.17%
Uzbekistan
5 publications, 6.17%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 5, 6.17%
Croatia
5 publications, 6.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 6.17%
South Africa
5 publications, 6.17%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 4, 4.94%
Kazakhstan
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 4, 4.94%
Armenia
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 4.94%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 4, 4.94%
Costa Rica
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 4.94%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 4.94%
Slovenia
4 publications, 4.94%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 3.7%
Ghana
3 publications, 3.7%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 3.7%
Ecuador
3 publications, 3.7%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 2.47%
Estonia
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 2.47%
Azerbaijan
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 2.47%
Botswana
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 2.47%
Vietnam
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 2.47%
Georgia
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 2.47%
Egypt
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 2.47%
Cameroon
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 2.47%
Latvia
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 2.47%
Tanzania
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 2.47%
Uganda
2 publications, 2.47%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 1.23%
Albania
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 1.23%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Hong Kong
|
Hong Kong, 1, 1.23%
Hong Kong
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 1.23%
Qatar
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 1.23%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 1.23%
Oman
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 1.23%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 1.23%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 1.23%
|
Show all (53 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Citing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 189, 23.45%
Organization not defined
189 citations, 23.45%
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
49 citations, 6.08%
|
|
Stanford University
23 citations, 2.85%
|
|
University of Oslo
19 citations, 2.36%
|
|
University of Birmingham
17 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Harvard University
16 citations, 1.99%
|
|
University of Oxford
13 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
13 citations, 1.61%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
13 citations, 1.61%
|
|
University of Auckland
12 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Tilburg University
12 citations, 1.49%
|
|
University of Vienna
12 citations, 1.49%
|
|
University of Zurich
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
La Trobe University
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
University of Wrocław
11 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Ghent University
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Haifa
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Australian National University
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of New South Wales
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Cambridge
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Melbourne
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Macquarie University
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
New York University
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Porto
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
SWPS University
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
University of Sussex
10 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
University of Bergen
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
King's College London
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
University of Agder
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Massey University
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
University of Queensland
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Witten/Herdecke University
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Utrecht University
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
9 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
University of Bern
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Aston University
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Aarhus University
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
University of Minnesota
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Comenius University Bratislava
8 citations, 0.99%
|
|
University of Lisbon
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
National University of Singapore
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Cornell University
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Charles University
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
University of Groningen
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
University of Leeds
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
University of Limerick
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
7 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Turku
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University College London
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Padua
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Michigan State University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Crete
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Michigan
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Saarland University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Konstanz
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Warsaw
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Granada
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Greenwich
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of São Paulo
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
University of Silesia in Katowice
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Singapore Management University
6 citations, 0.74%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of Delhi
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Stockholm University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Durham University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Georgetown University
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of Washington
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
University of the Philippines Diliman
5 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
Citing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 192, 23.82%
Country not defined
192 citations, 23.82%
|
USA
|
USA, 154, 19.11%
USA
154 citations, 19.11%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 89, 11.04%
United Kingdom
89 citations, 11.04%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 60, 7.44%
Russia
60 citations, 7.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 58, 7.2%
Germany
58 citations, 7.2%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 57, 7.07%
Australia
57 citations, 7.07%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 57, 7.07%
Canada
57 citations, 7.07%
|
China
|
China, 52, 6.45%
China
52 citations, 6.45%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 43, 5.33%
Norway
43 citations, 5.33%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 42, 5.21%
Netherlands
42 citations, 5.21%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 35, 4.34%
New Zealand
35 citations, 4.34%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 34, 4.22%
Spain
34 citations, 4.22%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 33, 4.09%
Poland
33 citations, 4.09%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 32, 3.97%
Israel
32 citations, 3.97%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 28, 3.47%
Sweden
28 citations, 3.47%
|
France
|
France, 25, 3.1%
France
25 citations, 3.1%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 25, 3.1%
Italy
25 citations, 3.1%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 25, 3.1%
Switzerland
25 citations, 3.1%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 23, 2.85%
Austria
23 citations, 2.85%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 22, 2.73%
Portugal
22 citations, 2.73%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 22, 2.73%
Belgium
22 citations, 2.73%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 20, 2.48%
Denmark
20 citations, 2.48%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 20, 2.48%
Turkey
20 citations, 2.48%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 19, 2.36%
Singapore
19 citations, 2.36%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 19, 2.36%
Philippines
19 citations, 2.36%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 16, 1.99%
Ireland
16 citations, 1.99%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 16, 1.99%
Finland
16 citations, 1.99%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 16, 1.99%
Japan
16 citations, 1.99%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 15, 1.86%
Brazil
15 citations, 1.86%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 1.86%
Malaysia
15 citations, 1.86%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 14, 1.74%
Slovakia
14 citations, 1.74%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 14, 1.74%
Czech Republic
14 citations, 1.74%
|
India
|
India, 13, 1.61%
India
13 citations, 1.61%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 13, 1.61%
Chile
13 citations, 1.61%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 11, 1.36%
North Macedonia
11 citations, 1.36%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 10, 1.24%
Greece
10 citations, 1.24%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 10, 1.24%
Indonesia
10 citations, 1.24%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 1.24%
Republic of Korea
10 citations, 1.24%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 9, 1.12%
Argentina
9 citations, 1.12%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 1.12%
Iran
9 citations, 1.12%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 9, 1.12%
Cyprus
9 citations, 1.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.99%
Colombia
8 citations, 0.99%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 0.99%
Mexico
8 citations, 0.99%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 8, 0.99%
Serbia
8 citations, 0.99%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 8, 0.99%
South Africa
8 citations, 0.99%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 7, 0.87%
Kazakhstan
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 7, 0.87%
Hungary
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 7, 0.87%
Morocco
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.87%
Nigeria
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 0.87%
Pakistan
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 7, 0.87%
Romania
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 7, 0.87%
Slovenia
7 citations, 0.87%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 6, 0.74%
Ukraine
6 citations, 0.74%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 6, 0.74%
Georgia
6 citations, 0.74%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 6, 0.74%
Lithuania
6 citations, 0.74%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.74%
UAE
6 citations, 0.74%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.74%
Croatia
6 citations, 0.74%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.62%
Estonia
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.62%
Bangladesh
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 5, 0.62%
Bulgaria
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 0.62%
Ghana
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.62%
Peru
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 0.62%
Thailand
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 5, 0.62%
Ecuador
5 citations, 0.62%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 4, 0.5%
Armenia
4 citations, 0.5%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.5%
Vietnam
4 citations, 0.5%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 4, 0.5%
Qatar
4 citations, 0.5%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 4, 0.5%
Kenya
4 citations, 0.5%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 3, 0.37%
Albania
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 3, 0.37%
Algeria
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.37%
Venezuela
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.37%
Egypt
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 3, 0.37%
Zambia
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 0.37%
Uganda
3 citations, 0.37%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 2, 0.25%
Afghanistan
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 0.25%
Botswana
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 2, 0.25%
Guatemala
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 2, 0.25%
Honduras
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 2, 0.25%
Dominican Republic
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.25%
Zimbabwe
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.25%
Iceland
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 0.25%
Cameroon
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.25%
Costa Rica
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.25%
Cuba
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.25%
Lebanon
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.25%
Luxembourg
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.25%
Oman
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.25%
Saudi Arabia
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 2, 0.25%
Syria
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.25%
Tunisia
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 2, 0.25%
Kosovo
2 citations, 0.25%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.12%
Azerbaijan
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Belize
|
Belize, 1, 0.12%
Belize
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.12%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Guinea
|
Guinea, 1, 0.12%
Guinea
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Hong Kong
|
Hong Kong, 1, 0.12%
Hong Kong
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.12%
Jordan
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.12%
Kyrgyzstan
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.12%
Laos
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.12%
Latvia
1 citation, 0.12%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.