Health Literacy, eHealth Literacy, Adherence to Infection Prevention and Control Procedures, Lifestyle Changes, and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Among Health Care Workers During Lockdown: Online Survey
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a heavy burden on health care systems and governments. Health literacy (HL) and eHealth literacy (as measured by the eHealth Literacy Scale [eHEALS]) are recognized as strategic public health elements but they have been underestimated during the pandemic. HL, eHEALS score, practices, lifestyles, and the health status of health care workers (HCWs) play crucial roles in containing the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective
The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the eHEALS and examine associations of HL and eHEALS scores with adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures, lifestyle changes, and suspected COVID-19 symptoms among HCWs during lockdown.
Methods
We conducted an online survey of 5209 HCWs from 15 hospitals and health centers across Vietnam from April 6 to April 19, 2020. Participants answered questions related to sociodemographics, HL, eHEALS, adherence to IPC procedures, behavior changes in eating, smoking, drinking, and physical activity, and suspected COVID-19 symptoms. Principal component analysis, correlation analysis, and bivariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to validate the eHEALS and examine associations.
Results
The eHEALS had a satisfactory construct validity with 8 items highly loaded on one component, with factor loadings ranked from 0.78 to 0.92 explaining 76.34% of variance; satisfactory criterion validity as correlated with HL (ρ=0.42); satisfactory convergent validity with high item-scale correlations (ρ=0.80-0.84); and high internal consistency (Cronbach α=.95). HL and eHEALS scores were significantly higher in men (unstandardized coefficient [B]=1.01, 95% CI 0.57-1.45, P<.001; B=0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.00, P<.001), those with a better ability to pay for medication (B=1.65, 95% CI 1.25-2.05, P<.001; B=0.60, 95% CI 0.34-0.86, P<.001), doctors (B=1.29, 95% CI 0.73-1.84, P<.001; B 0.56, 95% CI 0.20-0.93, P=.003), and those with epidemic containment experience (B=1.96, 95% CI 1.56-2.37, P<.001; B=0.64, 95% CI 0.38-0.91, P<.001), as compared to their counterparts, respectively. HCWs with higher HL or eHEALS scores had better adherence to IPC procedures (B=0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.15, P<.001; B=0.22, 95% CI 0.19-0.26, P<.001), had a higher likelihood of healthy eating (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P=.001; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, P=.002), were more physically active (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.03, P<.001; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.05, P<.001), and had a lower likelihood of suspected COVID-19 symptoms (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98, P<.001; OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, P<.001), respectively.
Conclusions
The eHEALS is a valid and reliable survey tool. Gender, ability to pay for medication, profession, and epidemic containment experience were independent predictors of HL and eHEALS scores. HCWs with higher HL or eHEALS scores had better adherence to IPC procedures, healthier lifestyles, and a lower likelihood of suspected COVID-19 symptoms. Efforts to improve HCWs’ HL and eHEALS scores can help to contain the COVID-19 pandemic and minimize its consequences.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
6 publications, 7.06%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
6 publications, 7.06%
|
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
5 publications, 5.88%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
5 publications, 5.88%
|
|
|
BMC Public Health
4 publications, 4.71%
|
|
|
International Journal of Medical Informatics
3 publications, 3.53%
|
|
|
Nutrients
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
Healthcare
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
Health Education
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
JMIR Medical Education
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
JMIR Human Factors
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Pedagogy in Health Promotion
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Vaccines
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Current Developments in Nutrition
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Health Policy
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Food Science and Nutrition
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
International journal of older people nursing
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Annals of Medicine
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Pathogens and Global Health
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Population Medicine
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
19 publications, 22.35%
|
|
|
MDPI
12 publications, 14.12%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
11 publications, 12.94%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
10 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Elsevier
10 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
SAGE
4 publications, 4.71%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 4.71%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 3.53%
|
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 2.35%
|
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
European Publishing
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
BMJ
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 1.18%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.