Open Access

Genetika, volume 52, issue 1, pages 1-13

Controversial taxonomy of hemp

Anamarija Koren ¹

Vladimir Sikora ¹

Biljana Kiprovski ¹

Milka Brdar-Jokanovic ¹

Milica Acimovic ¹

Bojan Konstantinovic ²

Dragana Latkovic ²

Hide authors affiliations Show authors affiliations: 2 affiliations

Institute of Field and Vegetable crops, Novi Sad, Serbia |

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Novi Sad, Serbia |

Publication type: Journal Article

Publication date: 2020-06-05

Drustvo Geneticara Srbije

Journal: Genetika

scimago Q3

SJR: 0.205

CiteScore: 1.8

Impact factor: —

ISSN: 05340012, 18206069

DOI: 10.2298/gensr2001001k

Copy DOI

Genetics

Plant Science

Abstract

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) was one of the earliest domesticated plant species. Biological classification (taxonomy or systematization) manifests evolutional relationships between taxons according to trait similarities. When it comes to taxonomy, hemp is one of the most controversial plant species due to significant effects of environmental conditions on hemp phenology and expression of quantitative traits as well as different levels of gender expression observed in hemp plants. Controversial taxonomy of hemp has gone through several phases throughout history. The attitude on the number of species within the genus Cannabis and the criteria used in taxonomic units division were under dispute. Initially focused on morphological characteristics and geographical origin, the approach was greatly amended by the development of molecular and biochemical techniques. The main cause of taxonomic uncertainties is the inbreeding ability of all wild Cannabis populations, resulting in continual variability of quantitative traits. The aim of the paper is to review the history of Cannabis classification including different approaches to this scientific issue.

Found

Top-30

Journals

	1 2
Molecules	Molecules, 2, 12.5% Molecules 2 publications, 12.5%
Frontiers in Plant Science	Frontiers in Plant Science, 1, 6.25% Frontiers in Plant Science 1 publication, 6.25%
Food Analytical Methods	Food Analytical Methods, 1, 6.25% Food Analytical Methods 1 publication, 6.25%
Science of the Total Environment	Science of the Total Environment, 1, 6.25% Science of the Total Environment 1 publication, 6.25%
Industrial Crops and Products	Industrial Crops and Products, 1, 6.25% Industrial Crops and Products 1 publication, 6.25%
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis	Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 1, 6.25% Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 1 publication, 6.25%
Agronomy	Agronomy, 1, 6.25% Agronomy 1 publication, 6.25%
Journal of Natural Fibers	Journal of Natural Fibers, 1, 6.25% Journal of Natural Fibers 1 publication, 6.25%
Genome	Genome, 1, 6.25% Genome 1 publication, 6.25%
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition	Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1, 6.25% Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 1 publication, 6.25%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research	Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1, 6.25% Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 1 publication, 6.25%
Natural Product Communications	Natural Product Communications, 1, 6.25% Natural Product Communications 1 publication, 6.25%
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science	IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1, 6.25% IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1 publication, 6.25%
	1 2

Publishers

	1 2 3 4
Elsevier	Elsevier, 4, 25% Elsevier 4 publications, 25%
MDPI	MDPI, 3, 18.75% MDPI 3 publications, 18.75%
Taylor & Francis	Taylor & Francis, 2, 12.5% Taylor & Francis 2 publications, 12.5%
Frontiers Media S.A.	Frontiers Media S.A., 1, 6.25% Frontiers Media S.A. 1 publication, 6.25%
Springer Nature	Springer Nature, 1, 6.25% Springer Nature 1 publication, 6.25%
Canadian Science Publishing	Canadian Science Publishing, 1, 6.25% Canadian Science Publishing 1 publication, 6.25%
Mary Ann Liebert	Mary Ann Liebert, 1, 6.25% Mary Ann Liebert 1 publication, 6.25%
SAGE	SAGE, 1, 6.25% SAGE 1 publication, 6.25%
IOP Publishing	IOP Publishing, 1, 6.25% IOP Publishing 1 publication, 6.25%
	1 2 3 4

We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.

Metrics

Cite this

GOST |

Cite this

GOST Copy

Koren A. et al. Controversial taxonomy of hemp // Genetika. 2020. Vol. 52. No. 1. pp. 1-13.

GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy

Koren A., Sikora V., Kiprovski B., Brdar-Jokanovic M., Acimovic M., Konstantinovic B., Latkovic D. Controversial taxonomy of hemp // Genetika. 2020. Vol. 52. No. 1. pp. 1-13.

RIS |

Cite this

RIS Copy

TY - JOUR

DO - 10.2298/gensr2001001k

UR - https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2001001k

TI - Controversial taxonomy of hemp

T2 - Genetika

AU - Koren, Anamarija

AU - Sikora, Vladimir

AU - Kiprovski, Biljana

AU - Brdar-Jokanovic, Milka

AU - Acimovic, Milica

AU - Konstantinovic, Bojan

AU - Latkovic, Dragana

PY - 2020

DA - 2020/06/05

PB - Drustvo Geneticara Srbije

SP - 1-13

IS - 1

VL - 52

SN - 0534-0012

SN - 1820-6069

ER -

BibTex |

Cite this

BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy

@article{2020_Koren,

author = {Anamarija Koren and Vladimir Sikora and Biljana Kiprovski and Milka Brdar-Jokanovic and Milica Acimovic and Bojan Konstantinovic and Dragana Latkovic},

title = {Controversial taxonomy of hemp},

journal = {Genetika},

year = {2020},

volume = {52},

publisher = {Drustvo Geneticara Srbije},

month = {jun},

url = {https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2001001k},

number = {1},

pages = {1--13},

doi = {10.2298/gensr2001001k}

}

MLA

Cite this

MLA Copy

Koren, Anamarija, et al. “Controversial taxonomy of hemp.” Genetika, vol. 52, no. 1, Jun. 2020, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr2001001k.

Found error?

Publisher

Drustvo Geneticara Srbije

Journal

Genetika

scimago Q3

SJR

0.205

CiteScore

1.8

Impact factor

—

ISSN

05340012 (Print)

18206069 (Electronic)