Open Access
Open access
volume 13 issue 5 pages 6217-6228

Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2013-05-13
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.764
CiteScore8.2
Impact factor3.5
ISSN14243210, 14248220
PubMed ID:  23669710
Biochemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Instrumentation
Abstract
Quorum sensing is a system of stimuli and responses in relation to bacterial cell population density that regulates gene expression, including virulence determinants. Consequently, quorum sensing has been an attractive target for the development of novel anti-infective measures that do not rely on the use of antibiotics. Anti-quorum sensing has been a promising strategy to combat bacterial infections as it is unlikely to develop multidrug resistant pathogens since it does not impose any selection pressure. A number of anti-quorum sensing approaches have been documented and plant-based natural products have been extensively studied in this context. Plant matter is one of the major sources of chemicals in use today in various industries, ranging from the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food biotechnology to the textile industries. Just like animals and humans, plants are constantly exposed to bacterial infections, it is therefore logical to expect that plants have developed sophisticated of chemical mechanisms to combat pathogens. In this review, we have surveyed the various types of plant-based natural products that exhibit anti-quorum sensing properties and their anti-quorum sensing mechanisms.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
11 publications, 5.12%
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
8 publications, 3.72%
Molecules
6 publications, 2.79%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
5 publications, 2.33%
Microbial Pathogenesis
5 publications, 2.33%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
5 publications, 2.33%
Natural Product Communications
4 publications, 1.86%
Sensors
4 publications, 1.86%
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 1.86%
Journal of Applied Microbiology
4 publications, 1.86%
Microorganisms
3 publications, 1.4%
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
2 publications, 0.93%
Antibiotics
2 publications, 0.93%
Plants
2 publications, 0.93%
Archives of Microbiology
2 publications, 0.93%
Current Microbiology
2 publications, 0.93%
International Microbiology
2 publications, 0.93%
BioNanoScience
2 publications, 0.93%
South African Journal of Botany
2 publications, 0.93%
Separation and Purification Technology
2 publications, 0.93%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2 publications, 0.93%
Food and Function
2 publications, 0.93%
Microbiology
2 publications, 0.93%
Natural Product Research
2 publications, 0.93%
Journal of Chemistry
2 publications, 0.93%
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.47%
Future Microbiology
1 publication, 0.47%
Journal of Medical Microbiology
1 publication, 0.47%
Medicines
1 publication, 0.47%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
Elsevier
53 publications, 24.65%
Springer Nature
35 publications, 16.28%
MDPI
30 publications, 13.95%
Wiley
17 publications, 7.91%
Taylor & Francis
14 publications, 6.51%
Frontiers Media S.A.
14 publications, 6.51%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
5 publications, 2.33%
SAGE
4 publications, 1.86%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 1.86%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 publications, 0.93%
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 0.93%
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 0.93%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 publications, 0.93%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 0.47%
Korean Society of Food Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.47%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.47%
Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
1 publication, 0.47%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 publication, 0.47%
International Association for Food Protection
1 publication, 0.47%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 0.47%
Scientific Publishers
1 publication, 0.47%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.47%
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
1 publication, 0.47%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.47%
Sociedad Botanica de Mexico
1 publication, 0.47%
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.47%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.47%
IGI Global
1 publication, 0.47%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.47%
10
20
30
40
50
60
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
215
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Koh C. L. et al. Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds // Sensors. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 5. pp. 6217-6228.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Koh C. L., Sam C., Yin W., Tan L., Krishnan T., Chong Y., Chan K. G. Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds // Sensors. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 5. pp. 6217-6228.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3390/s130506217
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s130506217
TI - Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds
T2 - Sensors
AU - Koh, Chong Lek
AU - Sam, Choon-Kook
AU - Yin, Wai-Fong
AU - Tan, Li
AU - Krishnan, Thiba
AU - Chong, Yee
AU - Chan, Kok Gan
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/05/13
PB - MDPI
SP - 6217-6228
IS - 5
VL - 13
PMID - 23669710
SN - 1424-3210
SN - 1424-8220
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2013_Koh,
author = {Chong Lek Koh and Choon-Kook Sam and Wai-Fong Yin and Li Tan and Thiba Krishnan and Yee Chong and Kok Gan Chan},
title = {Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds},
journal = {Sensors},
year = {2013},
volume = {13},
publisher = {MDPI},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/s130506217},
number = {5},
pages = {6217--6228},
doi = {10.3390/s130506217}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Koh, Chong Lek, et al. “Plant-Derived Natural Products as Sources of Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds.” Sensors, vol. 13, no. 5, May. 2013, pp. 6217-6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130506217.