Cellulose, volume 29, issue 3, pages 1543-1555

Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-01-22
Journal: Cellulose
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor5.7
ISSN09690239, 1572882X
Polymers and Plastics
Abstract
The global abundance and availability of oat hulls make them a promising feedstock to produce a unique type of cellulose, the bacterial one. This is the first study examining how a chemical pretreatment method of oat hulls influences the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose (BC) in extended cultivation. Here we employed our own pretreatment methods that use dilute HNO3 and NaOH solutions in one and two stages, a total of four pretreatment methods. Further technological stages were performed in the same manner: pulps were enzymatically hydrolyzed with commercial enzymes CelloLux-A and BrewZyme BGX, and biosynthesis of BC was run using the Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12 symbiotic culture. A two-stage (HNO3 + NaOH) pretreatment of oat hulls was found to afford a biologically good medium and increase the BC yield 1.8−3.2-fold compared to the other pretreatments used. A pretreatment method of oat hulls determined the BC yield and degree of polymerization. However, a pretreatment method had no impact on the highest crystallinity index and allomorph Iα content of all the BC samples, which is explained by Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12 used. The crystallinity index and allomorph Iα content, as measured by X-ray diffractometry, are proposed for use as BC quality assessment criteria.

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Polymers
4 publications, 25%
Cellulose
3 publications, 18.75%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
2 publications, 12.5%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2 publications, 12.5%
Crystals
1 publication, 6.25%
Annals of Microbiology
1 publication, 6.25%
Foods and Raw Materials
1 publication, 6.25%
Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
1 publication, 6.25%
Chemical Society Reviews
1 publication, 6.25%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
7 publications, 43.75%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 25%
Elsevier
2 publications, 12.5%
Kemerovo State University
1 publication, 6.25%
Wiley
1 publication, 6.25%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 6.25%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Skiba E. A. et al. Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste // Cellulose. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 3. pp. 1543-1555.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Skiba E. A., Gladysheva E. K., Budaeva V. V., Aleshina L. A., Sakovich G. V. Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste // Cellulose. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 3. pp. 1543-1555.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x
TI - Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste
T2 - Cellulose
AU - Skiba, Ekaterina A
AU - Gladysheva, Evgenia K
AU - Budaeva, V. V.
AU - Aleshina, Lyudmila A.
AU - Sakovich, Gennady V.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/01/22
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 1543-1555
IS - 3
VL - 29
SN - 0969-0239
SN - 1572-882X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2022_Skiba,
author = {Ekaterina A Skiba and Evgenia K Gladysheva and V. V. Budaeva and Lyudmila A. Aleshina and Gennady V. Sakovich},
title = {Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste},
journal = {Cellulose},
year = {2022},
volume = {29},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x},
number = {3},
pages = {1543--1555},
doi = {10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Skiba, Ekaterina A., et al. “Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste.” Cellulose, vol. 29, no. 3, Jan. 2022, pp. 1543-1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x.
Found error?
Profiles