Journal of Development Effectiveness
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.9
SJR
0.327
CiteScore
1.8
Categories
Development
Geography, Planning and Development
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2009-2025
journal names
Journal of Development Effectiveness
J DEV EFFECT
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Development Effectiveness
(469 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(231 citations)

Campbell Systematic Reviews
(199 citations)
Top-3 organizations

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
(14 publications)

University of Sussex
(14 publications)

University of East Anglia
(13 publications)

University College London
(4 publications)

Harvard University
(3 publications)

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 458
Q2

Evolving Contributions of Various Income Sources to U.S. Income Inequality Across Age Groups
Scharrer C.
Abstract
This paper studies the age-group-specific evolutions of inequality of total income among highly and less educated females and males at ages 26–85 from 2005 to 2018 in the United States. In particular, it presents time series of Gini coefficients and associated decompositions by different income components to highlight the contributions of different income sources to inequality in different age groups over time. The results indicate, among others, that especially an increasing number of individuals with zero incomes contributed to the observed increases of inequality among less educated females and males aged 26–45 and 26–55 after the Great Recession, respectively.
Q2

Social Participation and Health-Related Quality of Life: How Vulnerable are Internal Migrant Older Adults in China?
Yang Y., Kang F.
The social integration and health of migrant older adults are more vulnerable compared to their local counterparts. While previous research has explored the impact of social participation on the quality of life of migrant older adults, the mechanisms driving these effects remain unclear. This study examines this relationship emphasising the mediating role of self-efficacy. Using longitudinal data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Waves 3–4, lagged regression and instrumental variable methods were applied. Internal migrants aged 60 and over with valid data in both waves were included as the analytical sample (N = 1,349). The average frequency of community-level social participation and the number of grandchildren were used as instrumental variables. The results showed that social participation generally enhanced the quality of life for migrant older adults, however the effects varied depending on the type of participation. Simple socialising, intellectual activities, and group activities positively affected quality of life, while grandchild caring had a detrimental impact. Self-efficacy mediated the relationship between social participation and quality of life among migrant older adults, mitigating some negative effects of social participation. These findings highlight the importance of expanding opportunities for social participation and boosting self-efficacy through targeted interventions to enhance the well-being of migrant older adults.
Q2

The Right to Food in Question: A Comparative Analysis of Food Security Policies Aimed at the Elderly in Spain and Argentina
Gracia-Arnaiz M., Demonte F., Boragnio A.
Abstract
Since the 2008 economic recession, and in the wake of the health and energy crises, many countries have experienced growing precarization, forcing their governments to implement policies to alleviate increasing inequality suffered by the most disadvantaged groups. In this study, we show how this process has affected older people in Spain and Argentina. In particular, we want to determine whether there has been an increase in food insecurity (FI) during this period in two countries that, on paper, recognise the fundamental right of everyone to enjoy adequate food in all its dimensions and also have specific plans for active and healthy ageing. Based on a compilation and comparative analysis of socio-demographic, food and health indicators and policies/programmes targeted at this age group, we describe the profile and main needs of older people, as well as the mechanisms in place to guarantee (or not) this right. We discuss the different conceptions of food security in the two countries, along with the nature and scope of the measures adopted. We conclude that although food security (FS) policies are very different in Spain and Argentina, what they have in common is the absence and/or insufficiency of specific mechanisms for identifying the impact of growing precarization on food practices and health, and those most affected in terms of gender, social class or ethnic origin. We highlight the need to develop intersectional studies capable of diagnosing and detecting FI situations among older people and counteracting possible forms of ageism arising from this lack of knowledge.
Q2

Socioeconomic Vulnerabilities and Population Aging in Brazil: a Longitudinal Study
Rosalem L.J., da Cunha M.S.
This study focuses on identifying the personal, social and economic factors associated with experience of insecurity, financial instability, lack of access to medical care and lack of social support among older adults in Brazil. Using data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), panel and stacked logistic regressions were estimated, incorporating differential coefficients to assess potential changes between the two surveys. The main findings indicate that non-white individuals, those with a negative self-assessment of health, and residents of neglected environments have a higher odds ratio of experiencing feelings of insecurity, financial insecurity, and lack of access to medical care. Conversely, the marginal increase in age was inversely related to both types of insecurity and lack of medical care. Furthermore, social interaction with friends and relatives was identified as a protective factor against the four vulnerabilities studied.
Q2

Barrier Normalization Among Older Adults’ Perceptions of Senior Centre Accessibility
Mitchell F.R., Azar N.R., Mogyorody V., van Wyk P.M.
Accessible environments may facilitate age-friendly communities that promote health and community participation among older adults. Senior centres are one community resource that offer diverse services for older adults to support their physical and social well-being. However, little research has examined senior centre accessibility. This study interviews six older adults (M = 72 years) about their perceptions of accessibility at a senior centre. Thematic analysis yields two themes, ageing identity and barrier dismissal, which contribute to an overarching theme: barrier normalization. Beliefs about ageing and value of the senior centre may lead participants to normalize inaccessibility as part of ageing or a minor inconvenience. This perpetuates ideologies suggesting barriers are a personal problem, while minimizing the role environmental factors play in facilitating health and participation. Accessibility is a key characteristic for developing age-friendly communities that support healthy, active living among older adults. Barrier normalization may introduce challenges to reducing environmental factors and, subsequently, achieving sustainable, age-friendly communities.
Q2

Experiences of Caregiving and Service use Among Ethnic Migrant Older Adults and Their Caregivers in Western Countries: A Scoping Review
Iwuagwu A.O., Poon A.W., Fernandez E.
Globally, the population is ageing, and transnational migration has increased the number of persons aged 60 + from ethnic minority backgrounds in Western countries, highlighting the need for culturally focused care. Compared to the general population, ethnic minority groups access and utilise care services less frequently, and there is limited evidence on ethnic migrant adults and their caregivers' experiences of caregiving and care providing. We used Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review framework to explore ethnic migrant adults and their caregiver’s experiences and perceptions of caregiving and service use in Western countries. Six databases: CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PUBMED, Embase, and Family and Society Worldwide were searched from inception till June 2022. Articles were screened for inclusion using title/abstract and full-text screening. Forty-six (46) studies were included in the final analysis, and three themes emerged: positive experience, negative experience, and barriers to giving and receiving care by ethnic migrant older adults and their caregivers in Western countries. The findings of this review could potentially inform and enhance foundational discussion regarding inclusivity and diversity in care provision for ethnically diverse ageing populations in Western countries, and it will potentially inform ageing policies and future research on ethnic migrant older adults’ care.
Q2

Recreational Spaces: How Best to Design and Cater for Older People’s Safe Engagement in Physical Activity
Levinger P., Mcconaghy R., Dreher B., James L., Fearn M., McKenna T., Hallissey M., Hill K.D.
AbstractRecreational spaces, such as local parks, are important public spaces for the community to engage in various activities. With the global ageing population, the concept of multigenerational recreational spaces has become popular in recent years with the aim to design active spaces to cater for all age groups, including older people. However, designing multigenerational spaces that enable safe usage by older people can be challenging due to the competing interests and needs of different age groups. This paper is a reflective narrative describing four case studies of multigenerational outdoor spaces in Melbourne, Australia with the inclusion of age-friendly equipment and analysing parks layout and design using aerial imagery data. Factors impacting safe usage of the space by older people were identified and discussed. The main challenges identified in the recreational case study areas included: proximity of the seniors’ exercise area relative to children’s play-spaces, accessibility, layout of the area, and surrounding features which can pose potential safety risks for older people or be a deterrent for visiting the parks. The information described in this paper provides practical learnings relating to park layout, proximity of different spaces, and strategies that may be required to be implemented to facilitate safe usage of the space by older people for better multigenerational design. A national recreational age-friendly policy is also needed to provide overarching guidelines to assist local governments in the design and delivery of inclusive multigenerational recreational spaces.
Q2

The Personal and Societal Benefits of Social Activities for Older Adults in Russia: Experts’ Perspectives
Martynova L.
AbstractThe development of social activities specifically tailored for older adults needs to be grounded in a comprehensive understanding of the effects of these activities from multiple perspectives. The present study applies thematic analysis to examine experts’ views and experiences regarding the effects of social activities on older people of different ethnic backgrounds and various abilities in Russia. The results suggest that participation in such activities benefits the everyday personal development of older participants. The experts involved in organising and developing social activities also noted that family relationships may be enhanced through the participation of older adults due to changes in their lifestyles, opportunities to fulfil new social roles and related improvements in communication between family members. Social activities not only address stereotypes about older adults’ abilities but also affect the understanding of mature beauty in new ways while creating a more fulfilling environment for older people by better meeting their interests and needs. Regardless of the specific activity, older people’s participation facilitates the transmission of culture and traditions across generations, cultivates an image of older adults as valuable sources of information and provides a more comprehensive and inclusive conceptualisation of ageing within society. The experts who were interviewed for this study recommended that decisions about developing social activities be made with older adults rather than without considering their opinions, supporting horizontal connections and allowing the heterogeneity of older adults.
Q2

The Impact of Loneliness and Social Isolation on Dietary Choices and Practices among Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research
Allen-Perkins D., Rivero Jiménez B., López-Lago Ortiz L., Conde Caballero D., Mariano Juárez L.
Q2
Journal of Population Ageing
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Psychological Resilience and Complex Movement Coordination Predict the Risk of Falls in Older Adults
Tóth E.E., Vujić A., Ihász F., Ruíz-Barquín R., Szabo A.
AbstractThe prevalence of falls in older individuals worldwide is around 26.5%. There is an urgent need to identify factors antagonistic to advanced age-related falls regarding personal safety, family or nursing care time, and healthcare costs. The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between functional fitness, mental health indicators, and the risk of falling (ROF) in older adults. Thirty-eight older adults (60–94 years; 66% female) were tested individually with the Fullerton Functional Fitness Test (FFFT) after completing five instruments gauging resilience, well-being, satisfaction with life, happiness, and perceived stress. We measured the ROF with the Berg Balance Test. All objective and subjective measures correlated significantly with the ROF. Bayesian linear regressions revealed that complex movement coordination accounted for 68.8%, while resilience accounted for 48.5% of the variance in the ROF. Moreover, resilience was also a mediator between complex movement coordination and ROF. These results suggest that complex movement coordination-developing and resilience-enhancing training strategies might be beneficial in reducing the ROF in older adults.
Q2

Trends (2003–2020) in later-life sports participation among five ethnic groups in the Netherlands
van den Broek T.
This study assesses trends in regular (i.e., at least weekly) sports participation among people aged 55 + in the Netherlands. It also examines later-life sports participation differences between native Dutch people and their counterparts in four groups with a non-Western migration background (Turkish; Moroccan; Surinamese; Dutch Caribbean), and on how such differences developed between 2003 and 2020. Logistic regression analyses of population-based repeated cross-sectional survey data (n = 4,362) showed that regular later-life sports participation increased substantially between 2003 and 2020. Older people in all migrant groups considered were less likely than native Dutch people to participate in sports regularly. KHB decomposition analyses indicated that the rise in later-life sports participation between 2003 and 2020 and the lower sports participation rates of people of Turkish and Moroccan origin could partly be attributed to differences over time and between groups in educational attainment. Models with interaction terms were furthermore estimated to assess how ethnic differences in sports participation developed over the observed period. These models showed that the sports participation gap between people of Moroccan origin and native Dutch people became smaller between 2003 and 2020. Nevertheless, native Dutch people remained the group most likely to participate in sports regularly.
Q2

A Voice for all Ages
Harper S.
Q2
Journal of Population Ageing
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

The Profiles of Health Aging in Older Ethiopian Adults within the WHO Healthy Aging Framework
Belachew A., Cherbuin N., Bagheri N., Burns R.
AbstractThe World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Healthy Aging framework describes healthy aging as the maintenance of functional capacity in older adults. However, aging is a heterogeneous process influenced by genetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors, leading to variations in experiences of functional capacity among adults. In this study, Latent Class Analysis (LCA) classified groups of individuals based on their health and functional capacities. Adults from Northwest Ethiopia (n = 845) aged ≥ 60 years old, were interviewed about their cognition, mental health, social support, independence, and sensory functioning. LCA identified three groups, reflecting “high-“ (47.5%); "moderate-" (37.3%); and "low-functioning" (15.2%) participants. Compared to low-functioning individuals, high-functioning individuals were less likely to be aged 80+ (RR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.80), lonely (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.72, 3.18), but more likely to report normal nutritional status (RR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.47, 2.86), no multimorbidity (RR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.32), living in an urban area (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22), and financially independent (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.49). Notably, almost half of the sample was classified as high functioning, comparable to findings from other developing countries. Those individuals in the high-functioning group who did not meet the WHO criteria for functional capacity across all domains did not differ from those individuals who did meet all the WHO criteria. This positively demonstrates that older adults do not need to be functional across all dimensions to experience healthy aging.
Q2

Coping with the Care of Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central America: a Legal and Public Health Perspective
Gutiérrez-Murillo R.S., Grossi P.K.
The emergence of the 2019 novel coronavirus had a profound impact on social and healthcare structures. Public health and social assistance systems were confronted with demands that had never been seen before, necessitating the implementation of efficient coordination with all public sectors. This integrative documentary review employed a qualitative approach to examine the legal-health framework that was developed at both the regional and individual levels to safeguard the well-being of older adults in Central American countries during the 2020–2021 biennium. The review provides a comprehensive examination of regional and national guidelines, health regulations, situational and epidemiological bulletins, national and regional strategies, technical recommendations, and sectoral protocols. The management of the pandemic among the older adult population revealed both shortcomings and achievements. These were contingent upon the approach taken, which was not collective despite the setting of regional goals during the health crisis. Ideological and political arguments that were not aligned with the scientific approach brought significant challenges to the region, with the impact being more pronounced according to the place of residence.
Q2

To Gain One More Close Person: A Polish Study on How Volunteers Working With Seniors Perceive the Significance of their Work and What they Consider Essential to Continue It
Nowakowska I.
AbstractIn an ageing and ever lonelier society, volunteering based on intergenerational relationships is becoming an increasingly salient form of support, but also a valuable leisure activity. With the help of thematic analysis, the study explored (1) how young adult volunteers working with seniors perceive their work and (2) what encouraged them to take up the volunteering role and what makes it easier or possible for them to remain active. Interviews were conducted in Poland in 2020 with 10 volunteers aged between 22 and 35 (6 women, 4 men) who had experience of working with seniors during the year preceding the study. Seven issues emerged from the analysis: the context in which volunteering began; personal characteristics of the volunteer; daily difficulties of the elderly; keeping the senior company in transience and loneliness; attachment and relationship between the volunteer and the elderly person(s); personal benefits of involvement in volunteering; social benefits of involvement in volunteering. The results were discussed in the light of the volunteer process model and the types of volunteers’ motivations. Several volunteers also pointed to the role of volunteering not only in building a norm of reciprocity in relationships with seniors, but also more broadly in the society.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Journal of Development Effectiveness
469 citations, 7.38%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
231 citations, 3.63%
|
|
Campbell Systematic Reviews
199 citations, 3.13%
|
|
World Development
171 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Journal of Development Studies
87 citations, 1.37%
|
|
PLoS ONE
86 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Sustainability
71 citations, 1.12%
|
|
BMC Public Health
59 citations, 0.93%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
48 citations, 0.75%
|
|
European Journal of Development Research
46 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Development Policy Review
44 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Land Use Policy
40 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Economic Development and Cultural Change
37 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Development Economics
37 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Maternal and Child Nutrition
37 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
36 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Evaluation
35 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Land
34 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Global Food Security
33 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Food Policy
33 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Food Security
33 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Energy Policy
32 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Health Policy and Planning
31 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
31 citations, 0.49%
|
|
BMJ Open
29 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Nutrition
28 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Heliyon
25 citations, 0.39%
|
|
World Bank Research Observer
25 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Review of Development Economics
23 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
23 citations, 0.36%
|
|
BMJ Global Health
22 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of International Development
21 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Energy for Sustainable Development
21 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Evaluation and Program Planning
21 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
World Bank Economic Review
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Systematic Reviews
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
20 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
19 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Development in Practice
18 citations, 0.28%
|
|
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of African Economies
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Economics of Education Review
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
16 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
16 citations, 0.25%
|
|
The Lancet
16 citations, 0.25%
|
|
PLoS Medicine
15 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Energies
15 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Review of Education
15 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Developments in Nutrition
14 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
14 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Health Economics (United Kingdom)
14 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Health Nutrition
14 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)
14 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Forest Policy and Economics
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Development
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Economic Literature
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Gates Open Research
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal for Equity in Health
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Journal of Evaluation
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Disasters
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energy Economics
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Labour Economics
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Economics
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Evaluation Review
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Development Perspectives
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agriculture and Food Security
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
AIDS and Behavior
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
African Evaluation Journal
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Open Research Europe
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Review of Educational Research
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Development and Change
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Oxford Development Studies
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Empirical Economics
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environment and Development Economics
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
New Directions for Evaluation
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environmental Evidence
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Global Health Action
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Global Social Policy
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IDS Bulletin
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Third World Quarterly
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Trials
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Elsevier
1235 citations, 19.42%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1067 citations, 16.78%
|
|
Wiley
818 citations, 12.86%
|
|
Springer Nature
766 citations, 12.05%
|
|
SAGE
283 citations, 4.45%
|
|
MDPI
268 citations, 4.21%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
221 citations, 3.48%
|
|
Oxford University Press
207 citations, 3.26%
|
|
Emerald
157 citations, 2.47%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
122 citations, 1.92%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
96 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
96 citations, 1.51%
|
|
BMJ
69 citations, 1.09%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
57 citations, 0.9%
|
|
American Economic Association
43 citations, 0.68%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
36 citations, 0.57%
|
|
IGI Global
35 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
24 citations, 0.38%
|
|
IOP Publishing
22 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
22 citations, 0.35%
|
|
AOSIS
19 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Annual Reviews
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
F1000 Research
17 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IWA Publishing
16 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
15 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SciELO
12 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
JMIR Publications
10 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, University of Sussex
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
8 citations, 0.13%
|
|
World Scientific
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Royal Society
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Academic Journals
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
OpenEdition
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Berkeley Electronic Press
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EDP Sciences
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Management
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Public Health Association
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bristol University Press
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pan American Health Organization
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Health Organization
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Practical Action Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Copernicus
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Unisa Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Thomas Telford
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CAIRN
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Applied Economics Association
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University, School of World Politics
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Association for African Studies
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of California Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brookings Institution Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Cornell University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
14 publications, 3.06%
|
|
University of Sussex
14 publications, 3.06%
|
|
University of East Anglia
13 publications, 2.84%
|
|
Stanford University
10 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Harvard University
10 publications, 2.18%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
9 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University College London
7 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
7 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Göttingen
7 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Bath
7 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology
5 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Peking University
4 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
4 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
4 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
4 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Antwerp
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Tokyo
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Aga Khan University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Center for International Forestry Research Indonesia
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Bern
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Sorbonne University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Northwest University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of South Africa
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Georgetown University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Mahidol University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
American University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Seoul National University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Clemson University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Oregon State University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
International Rice Research Institute
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Georgia State University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Ghana
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University for Development Studies
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National University of La Plata
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Hohenheim
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Carleton University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
BRAC University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of York
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Akaki Tsereteli State University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Kohat University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City Open University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
O. P. Jindal Global University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 3.01%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University of Sussex
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Bern
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Sorbonne University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Georgia State University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University for Development Studies
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Göttingen
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Hohenheim
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Carleton University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
BRAC University
2 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Akaki Tsereteli State University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City Open University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Ashoka University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
China Three Gorges University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
City, University of London
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Molise
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Teramo
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Monash University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Cape Town
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Pretoria
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of the Free State
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Ibero-American University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Udayana University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Dalhousie University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Federal University of Technology Akure
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Seoul National University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Northwestern University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Gulu University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Dar es Salaam
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Chicago
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Ghana
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Pablo de Olavide University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Almería
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Tokyo
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Waseda University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Kansai University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Soka University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Exeter
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Extremadura
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
University of Delaware
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Tennessee State University
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Universidad ORT Uruguay
1 publication, 0.75%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
USA
|
USA, 178, 38.86%
USA
178 publications, 38.86%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 94, 20.52%
United Kingdom
94 publications, 20.52%
|
India
|
India, 43, 9.39%
India
43 publications, 9.39%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 25, 5.46%
Germany
25 publications, 5.46%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 21, 4.59%
Italy
21 publications, 4.59%
|
China
|
China, 19, 4.15%
China
19 publications, 4.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 4.15%
Netherlands
19 publications, 4.15%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 18, 3.93%
South Africa
18 publications, 3.93%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 15, 3.28%
Bangladesh
15 publications, 3.28%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 14, 3.06%
Canada
14 publications, 3.06%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 13, 2.84%
Australia
13 publications, 2.84%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 12, 2.62%
Kenya
12 publications, 2.62%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 11, 2.4%
Norway
11 publications, 2.4%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 11, 2.4%
Japan
11 publications, 2.4%
|
France
|
France, 10, 2.18%
France
10 publications, 2.18%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 10, 2.18%
Ghana
10 publications, 2.18%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 10, 2.18%
Mexico
10 publications, 2.18%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 9, 1.97%
Belgium
9 publications, 1.97%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 8, 1.75%
Denmark
8 publications, 1.75%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 1.75%
Sweden
8 publications, 1.75%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 7, 1.53%
Indonesia
7 publications, 1.53%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 1.53%
Pakistan
7 publications, 1.53%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 6, 1.31%
Argentina
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 6, 1.31%
Vietnam
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 6, 1.31%
Peru
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 6, 1.31%
Republic of Korea
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 6, 1.31%
Philippines
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 1.31%
Switzerland
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 6, 1.31%
Ethiopia
6 publications, 1.31%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 1.09%
Colombia
5 publications, 1.09%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 1.09%
Thailand
5 publications, 1.09%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 5, 1.09%
Uganda
5 publications, 1.09%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.87%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.87%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 0.87%
Spain
4 publications, 0.87%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 4, 0.87%
Malawi
4 publications, 0.87%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 4, 0.87%
Nepal
4 publications, 0.87%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.87%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.87%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.66%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.66%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.66%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.66%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.66%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.66%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 3, 0.66%
Senegal
3 publications, 0.66%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 2, 0.44%
Burkina Faso
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 2, 0.44%
Honduras
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 2, 0.44%
Laos
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.44%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.44%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.44%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.44%
Chile
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.44%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.22%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.22%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.22%
Benin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.22%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.22%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.22%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.22%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.22%
Iran
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.22%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.22%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.22%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.22%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.22%
Mali
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.22%
Malta
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.22%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.22%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.22%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.22%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.22%
Finland
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.22%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.22%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.22%
|
South Sudan
|
South Sudan, 1, 0.22%
South Sudan
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.22%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Show all (42 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
USA
|
USA, 48, 36.09%
USA
48 publications, 36.09%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 18, 13.53%
United Kingdom
18 publications, 13.53%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 9, 6.77%
Kenya
9 publications, 6.77%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 8, 6.02%
Germany
8 publications, 6.02%
|
India
|
India, 8, 6.02%
India
8 publications, 6.02%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 8, 6.02%
Canada
8 publications, 6.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 7, 5.26%
Ghana
7 publications, 5.26%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 7, 5.26%
Netherlands
7 publications, 5.26%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 5.26%
Japan
7 publications, 5.26%
|
China
|
China, 6, 4.51%
China
6 publications, 4.51%
|
France
|
France, 5, 3.76%
France
5 publications, 3.76%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 3.76%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 3.76%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 3.76%
Italy
5 publications, 3.76%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 5, 3.76%
Ethiopia
5 publications, 3.76%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 3.01%
Spain
4 publications, 3.01%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 3.01%
Switzerland
4 publications, 3.01%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 2.26%
Colombia
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 2.26%
Mexico
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 2.26%
Pakistan
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 2.26%
Peru
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 2.26%
Uganda
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 2.26%
Sweden
3 publications, 2.26%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 2.26%
South Africa
3 publications, 2.26%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 1.5%
Australia
2 publications, 1.5%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 1.5%
Belgium
2 publications, 1.5%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1.5%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1.5%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 1.5%
Tanzania
2 publications, 1.5%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 1.5%
Uruguay
2 publications, 1.5%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.75%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.75%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.75%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.75%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.75%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 1, 0.75%
Honduras
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.75%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.75%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.75%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.75%
Laos
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.75%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.75%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.75%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.75%
Norway
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.75%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.75%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.75%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.75%
Finland
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.75%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.75%
Chile
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.75%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.75%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.75%
|
South Sudan
|
South Sudan, 1, 0.75%
South Sudan
1 publication, 0.75%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
1 profile journal article
Wagner Natascha
42 publications,
487 citations
h-index: 12