Research Papers in Education
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.1
SJR
1.201
CiteScore
7.2
Categories
Education
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1986-2025
journal names
Research Papers in Education
RES PAP EDUC
Top-3 citing journals

Research Papers in Education
(566 citations)

British Educational Research Journal
(301 citations)

Teaching and Teacher Education
(259 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Cambridge
(36 publications)

University of Exeter
(29 publications)

University of Oxford
(18 publications)

University College London
(8 publications)

Ghent University
(7 publications)

University of Warwick
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 351
Q2

The relationship between work-family enrichment, trust and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work passion in hybrid vs on-site work
Kidron A., Vinarski Peretz H.
PurposeThis study develops and tests an integrative theoretical framework that synchronizes conservation of resources (COR) theory with self-determination theory (SDT), thus permitting a simultaneous estimate of both antecedents and outcomes of work passion. The study utilizes a key assumption: work-family enrichment (WFE) and trust in one’s manager may be perceived as resources supporting greater employee work passion, resulting in decreased turnover intentions.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted online in three waves with 352 respondents from various private and public sector organizations responding.FindingsComplete indirect effects were found in WFE/FWE regarding turnover intentions through work passion as a mediator. Work passion partially mediated the relationship between trust in the manager and turnover intentions. Hybrid employees were found to be more passionate than onsite employees.Practical implicationsHuman resource (HR) departments should implement programs that support both employees and their families to foster WFE and encourage work passion, particularly in the current era of flexible work arrangements. As well, managers should prioritize building trust with their employees through open communication and consistent support, as this trust directly enhances work passion and reduces turnover intentions.Originality/valueBy integrating COR theory and SDT principles, our findings provide valuable empirical insights not only for understanding the context in which work passion develops but also how it is incorporated into a “resource caravan passageway.” This dynamic reflects a “gain spiral” in which contextual resources can promote work passion and ultimately reduce turnover intentions.
Q2

The Q method as research and intervention tool in organizations: a systematic literature review
van Oortmerssen L.A., Peeters E.R., Kampermann A., van Montfoort I.
PurposeThe Q method is an inherently mixed-method approach suitable for tackling issues regarding theory, conceptualization and operationalization in the social sciences. Nevertheless, the application of this method in organizational behavior (OB) studies is still limited. This paper aims to delineate to what extent, regarding what topics, and in what ways the Q method has been applied in OB studies. Moreover, it aims to systematically explore the strengths and weaknesses of this method for the OB field.Design/methodology/approachWe present a systematic literature review of 47 studies employing the Q method in OB research.FindingsThere is an upward trend in the application of Q in OB research. The studies in our sample address the following OB topics: Human resource management (HRM) (14), leadership (10), group decision-making (6), collaboration (4), culture (9) and organizational change and development (4). We describe how Q is used in a wide variety of ways.Practical implicationsThis study shows how performance-oriented organizations can benefit from the Q method as a managerial diagnostic and intervention tool in organizational change and development and in human resources management.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review on the Q method that spans the field of organizational behavior across topics and research levels, including the individual, team and organizational levels.
Q2

Open strategizing by public organizations: a qualitative comparative analysis of recent practices in Dutch infrastructure planning
Baartmans M.D., Busscher T., Verweij S., Arts J.
PurposeWide participation in the strategic processes of public organizations can enhance inclusion and transparency, thereby contributing to improved performance of public organizations. However, engaging with external participants is easier said than done. This study aims to identify how public organizations can open up their strategic processes to external participants.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on qualitative data from 12 early-phase strategy projects in the 2023 Dutch Multi-Year Program for Infrastructure, Spatial Planning and Transport (MIRT). Interviews and document data were collected and analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA).FindingsThis study identifies that the government steering the process itself, by aiming for idea generation, opens up strategic processes. This is necessary for contributing to improved public service performance.Practical implicationsThis study provides strategy actors (e.g. managers, planners and consultants) with actionable knowledge about what open strategizing with external participants requires to create openness.Originality/valueThis study addresses the ongoing and increased interest in the openness of strategy processes in general and in infrastructure planning in particular. It contributes to the discussion on whether and how participation leads to improved performance of public organizations. Additionally, this study illustrates the application of QCA to the study of open strategy processes.
Q2

Configuring training competencies and self-esteem in determining employability skills through fsQCA
Hisa A.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the causal recipes among training competencies (TC) dimensions and self-esteem in predicting employability skills (ES) perceptions. It also examines the different combinations across specific demographic characteristics and professions.Design/methodology/approachA survey was used to collect data from 225 youths aged 15–35 years, purposively selected from leadership training programmes in Brunei. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method was adopted to confirm the propositions.FindingsThe findings captured multiple combinations of TC dimensions (i.e. knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour) and self-esteem in achieving high levels of perceived ES. The study also unveils how different levels of determinants can be more or less important for greater ES outcomes across youths' demographic characteristics and professions.Practical implicationsThe findings will assist organisations and training providers of leadership programmes in understanding the significance of TC and self-esteem as well as its alternative routes in pursuing greater employability narratives.Originality/valueThis study was the first attempt to integrate ES into a configurational framework, offering a multifaceted perspective of the causal combinations of TC dimensions and self-esteem as their determinants. Taken together, the study is set within the principles of human capital theory and self-determination theory, confirming the crucial positions of TC and self-esteem in encouraging youth’s acquisition of ES, which is an increasingly pertinent, yet under-examined, area of research.
Q2

Digital enablers of entrepreneurial innovation: fsQCA and NCA analysis
Reyes-Mercado P., Larios Hernandez G.J.
PurposeThe objective of this paper is to analyze the country-level causal configurations of digital enablers that result in entrepreneurial innovation in new ventures. Entrepreneurial innovation is a complex phenomenon that draws on a combination of context-dependent causal conditions, which explain the configurations of external factors that integrate into the entrepreneurial process. In this paper, we focus on the contextual role of information and communication technologies (ICT) from an organizational center-edge approach.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs case-oriented techniques, specifically fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and necessary condition analysis (NCA), to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions that lead to entrepreneurial innovation. A dataset comprising 61 countries was merged from the World Economic Forum’s Networked Readiness Index and the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor in order to explore the causal combinations of ICT adoption, online transactions business-to-business, business model innovation and organizational innovation.FindingsThe fsQCA demonstrates that entrepreneurial innovation can be attributed to two causal configurations. The first configuration includes ICT adoption, online business-to-business transactions and the absence of organizational innovation. The second configuration is characterized by ICT adoption, online business-to-business transactions and business model innovation. The NCA reveals that the conditions in question possess varying degrees of importance, with each condition exerting a distinct degree of influence on the generation of varying levels of entrepreneurial innovation. The case-oriented techniques employed in this research paper have yielded preliminary insights into the relationship between digital enablers and entrepreneurial innovation, particularly in groups of countries with varying degrees of necessity to these enablers.Practical implicationsOur research provides a framework for the development of more effective digital strategic mixes for each identified group of countries. It also raises theoretical questions about the national conditions that encourage a particular digital enabler to stimulate a specific form of entrepreneurial innovation in new ventures.Originality/valueIn lieu of pursuing definitive causal explanations, this study proposes alternative configurations. While fsQCA demonstrates that entrepreneurial innovation is contingent upon distinctive causal conditions, extending the analysis to NCA reveals the level of necessity required for a condition to yield varying degrees of entrepreneurial innovation. The integration of fsQCA and NCA offers a more nuanced understanding of context-dependent factors that define entrepreneurial innovation in new ventures than fsQCA alone.
Q2

Trickle-down effects of supervisors’ family-to-work enrichment and conflict: the roles of supervisor support and dyadic similarity
Wang P., Steed L.B., Wang Z.
PurposeDrawing upon the Conservation of Resources theory and Relational Demography Theory, we examine the crossover of supervisor family experiences to subordinates in the workplace. We posit that supervisor family-to-work enrichment and conflict influence subordinate perceptions of supervisor support for work–family, which, in turn, positively affects subordinate work engagement and job satisfaction and negatively affects subordinate turnover intentions. The effects of supervisor family-to-work enrichment and conflict on perceptions of supervisor support are respectively suggested to be strengthened and weakened by the demographic similarity between the supervisor and the subordinate.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 496 employees nested within 83 supervisors from China, we conducted a multilevel analysis.FindingsOur results indicate that supervisor family-to-work conflict and supervisor family-to-work enrichment have negative and positive effects (respectively) on subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor work–family support, and this effect is moderated by low, rather than high, similarity in the supervisor–subordinate dyad. An overall indirect effect of supervisor family-to-work enrichment and family-to-work conflict on subordinate work engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions through the mediator of perceived supervisor work–family support is also confirmed.Practical implicationsFrom a practical standpoint, our research emphasizes the importance for organizations to support supervisors in achieving work–family balance in order to promote positive employee work-related outcomes.Originality/valueOur study contributes to work–family literature by unraveling how and when resources may travel through supervisors to affect the generation of new resources (i.e. supervisor support for work–family) and ultimately affect subordinate outcomes in the workplace.
Q2

Building competitive advantage: how organizational culture shapes absorptive capacity through knowledge sharing
Iqbal S., Ullah S., Rizwan A., Nazeer N., Rasheed M., Siddiqi A.F.
PurposeThe strict regulations and reporting requirements in microfinance institutions require a high level of knowledge and expertise in finance, accounting and risk management. Therefore, microfinance institutions (MFIs) must possess a high absorptive capacity to understand their customers’ needs and develop appropriate products and services to meet them. This study explains how organizational culture influences absorptive capacity in MFIs, with a particular focus on the mediating role of knowledge sharing.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 450 randomly selected employees of microfinance banking institutions in Pakistan. The data were tested for reliability and validity, and hypotheses were tested through structural equation modeling in WarpPLS 8.0.FindingsThe findings show that knowledge! sharing mediates the relationship between organizational culture and absorptive capacity. Thus, MFIs should promote knowledge sharing as a cultural value to improve their ability to acquire and utilize new knowledge, enhance absorptive capacity to drive innovation and facilitate the development of new products and services.Practical implicationsMFIs with higher absorptive capacity are more likely to be able to respond to changes in the market, such as new technologies or shifting customer demands. Therefore, managers should promote a culture of sharing knowledge and expertise to ensure adaptability in dynamic market conditions.Originality/valueThis research provides a framework for organizations to better understand the role of knowledge sharing in their success and how to leverage it to enhance their absorptive capacity. It is valuable for academics and practitioners seeking to improve organizational performance and competitiveness.
Q2

The influence of organizational trust and social exchange on organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating role of workplace spirituality
Kidron A., Vinarski Peretz H.
PurposeThe field of spirituality is undergoing a transition from an advocacy-based approach to one that is grounded in scientific evidence. The advantages of workplace spirituality for employee performance remain under-researched, however, particularly in the context of service roles. This study addresses this gap by examining the mediating role of workplace spirituality between social exchange, organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).Design/methodology/approachA two-wave online survey was conducted, with 350 participating Israeli service employees. Structural equation modeling was utilized to test the hypotheses.FindingsEmpirically testing workplace spirituality and OCB by their dimensions advances the field, exposes unique rather than general relationships. Workplace spirituality’s latent factors were found as mediators: alignment with organizational values mediated the relationship between social exchange, organizational trust and OCBs directed toward individuals (OCBI), whereas meaningful work mediated the relationship between social exchange, organizational trust and citizenship behaviors directed toward the organization (OCBO).Practical implicationsIt would be advisable to give direct attention to strategies and programs that foster workplace spirituality and OCB among employees by HRM and service department managers.Originality/valueThe current study is the first of its kind to address workplace spirituality as a mediator between social exchange, organizational trust and OCB. The findings serve as a springboard for integrating workplace spirituality into employee performance research.
Q2

Nexus between workplace spirituality, open innovation mindset and job embeddedness: the role of self-efficacy and mindfulness
Jehanzeb H., Memon M.A., Mirza M.Z., Muenjohn N.
PurposeDrawing on job demands-resources theory, this paper aims to investigate the impact of workplace spirituality on mindfulness and the subsequent effects of mindfulness on open innovation mindset and job embeddedness. Additionally, it examines the mediating role of mindfulness between workplace spirituality and key outcomes, including open innovation mindset and job embeddedness. Lastly, the study investigates the moderating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between workplace spirituality and mindfulness.Design/methodology/approachThe research utilized multiple sampling techniques to collect data from employees across numerous sectors. A total of 197 viable responses were collected. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the proposed hypotheses.FindingsThe results indicate that workplace spirituality has a positive impact on mindfulness, which in turn increases employees’ job embeddedness and an open innovation mindset. Additionally, it was found that mindfulness mediates the relationship between workplace spirituality and both job embeddedness and open innovation mindset. Surprisingly and unexpectedly, the results indicate a negative moderating impact of self-efficacy between workplace spirituality and mindfulness.Practical implicationsCultivating a sense of purpose and meaningful work, alongside mindfulness programs and recruitment practices focused on cultural fit, can enhance both employee retention and innovation.Originality/valueLittle to no research exists that clarifies how workplace spirituality impacts employees’ job embeddedness and an open innovation mindset. Notably, the mediating role of mindfulness remains unexplored. This study is among the first to explore the mediating role of mindfulness between workplace spirituality and outcomes such as job embeddedness and an open innovation mindset. Additionally, the moderating role of self-efficacy between workplace spirituality and mindfulness is almost absent in the existing literature. Lastly, the unexpected findings on the role of self-efficacy in this study open fresh avenues for future research.
Q2

Antecedents and consequences of organization engagement in nonprofit organizations: the case of sport clubs
Kondert S., Marcus B.
PurposeThis paper investigates the role of organization engagement and extra-role behavior in nonprofit sport clubs and examines how team dynamics and eudaimonic well-being in sport club members are influential for organization engagement. We further investigate the moderating influence of organizational tenure between team reflexivity and team identification.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data from 545 sport club members in the UK and applied structural equation modeling (SPSS AMOS 29) to test the research model.FindingsThe results show that organization engagement is positively associated with extra-role behavior, except the social dimension of engagement, which is negatively associated. We established that team identification and eudaimonic well-being fully mediate the association between team reflexivity and organization engagement. The moderating effect of organizational tenure supports that team reflexivity is more effective for members with short-term tenure to strengthen team identification.Practical implicationsManagers in sport clubs are advised to consider the type of information exchanged, the way it is discussed, the intensity or regularity of team reflexivity and the degree of interactivity between members as critical factors that influence team dynamics and organization engagement.Originality/valueWe contribute to research in two major ways. First, we extend previous research on organization engagement by offering a multidimensional investigation of organization engagement in a nonprofit sport club context. Second, we extend previous research on organization engagement by introducing new antecedents and consequences in this context.
Q2

Pathways from supervisor incivility to workplace deviance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and supervisor-targeted aggression
Madan P., Srivastava S., Gupta B.
PurposeDrawing on the frustration-aggression-displacement (FAD) hypothesis, this study investigates the link between supervisor incivility and workplace deviant behavior through the mediating pathways of supervisor-targeted aggression and emotional exhaustion. Additionally, it examines the moderating role of psychopathy in the relationships between supervisor incivility and supervisor-targeted aggression and supervisor incivility and emotional exhaustion.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from hotel employees through a three-wave study, and variance-based partial least square structural equation modeling (VB-SEM) was employed to analyze the hypothesized associations.FindingsResults indicate that supervisor-targeted aggression and emotional exhaustion mediate the relationships between supervisor incivility and workplace deviant behavior. However, psychopathy did not show any significant moderating effect.Practical implicationsThe findings provide valuable insights for managers to develop effective strategies for reducing organizational incivility and deviant behaviors.Originality/valueThis study identifies two mediating mechanisms linking supervisor incivility to workplace deviant behavior and adds to the limited understanding of how supervisor incivility can lead to negative employee behaviors.
Q2

Strategic human resources management in times of economic uncertainty: a lifebuoy for employees?
Mousa M., Arslan A.
PurposeDrawing on social exchange and street-level bureaucracy (SLB) theories, the authors of the present paper seek to identify how public banks in Egypt strategically manage their frontline employees to maintain high performance even during periods of economic uncertainty.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical sample comprises semi-structured interviews with 28 frontline employees working in 4 public banks. The authors used the Gioia mechanism to analyze their data.FindingsThe authors identified job-related (discretionary power of bank employees, nature of banking jobs and hiring elite individuals for banking jobs); learning-related (continuous learning of bank employees, spread of MBA programs and resilience of bank employees) and context-related categories of factors (career support and more financial rewards during economic uncertainty) that explain the stability of the performance of the frontline bank employees addressed in this study despite the economic uncertainty their country is passing through.Practical implicationsGiven the findings of the present paper, the authors propose that the administration of the addressed banks maintain the policy of providing training opportunities to their employees. However, such training should pay more attention to issues such as crisis management, customer-employee engagement and the mental health of employees during crises, among others. Second, as dissatisfaction is very high with other public sector organizations in Egypt, their top management should try to learn from public banks, follow the best practices and collaborate with them to improve their service offerings to the citizens. Finally, for global financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund who are involved in rescuing Egyptian economy should incorporate strategic human resources management implementation in public sector organizations in their recommendations, along with economic reforms package.Originality/valueThis paper contributes by filling a gap in the literature on strategic human resources management and economic uncertainty in which empirical studies of the association between them, particularly in the context of North African countries such as Egypt, have been limited so far.
Q2

Carrying the load: a moderated mediation study exploring the link between perceived organizational support and burnout amongst management consultants
Bernard D., McGuire D., Harte P., Müller P.
PurposeThis study investigates the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS), employee resilience and workload on burnout in the consulting sector, which is characterized by long working hours and high pressure.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed hypotheses were tested using data collected from a sample of 169 management consultants. The key constructs were examined using the PROCESS statistical package.FindingsThe findings indicate that POS has a positive effect on exhaustion, cynicism and professional inefficacy. This effect is partially mediated by employee resilience for all three dimensions. A significant moderation between workload and POS has been found for the cynicism dimension of burnout, suggesting that the positive effect of high POS is especially useful for consultants with high workloads (exceeding 60 working hours per week).Practical implicationsThese findings highlight the importance of making employees feel supported in high-pressure work environments, as this has both a direct effect on employees' mental health and an indirect effect by increasing resilience, which in turn reduces the risk of burnout.Originality/valueThe study addresses the paucity of research on the workloads of management consultants and how they navigate burnout. The findings show that both personal resources (in this case, resilience) and organizational resources (POS) have a favorable impact on preventing burnout.
Q2

Understanding BallotLoafing at work: examining employee loafing during political elections
Salehzadeh R., Esmailian H., Javani M.
PurposeGiven the concept of loafing at work and its IT equivalent, cyberloafing, we propose the concept of BallotLoafing to metaphorically describe a similar phenomenon occurring during political elections. BallotLoafing describes how employees’ attention can become absorbed by discussions, debates or following news related to an election, shifting focus away from work tasks. This study aims to investigate the effects of attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control on employees’ intention to engage in BallotLoafing behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior. Additionally, the research explores the moderating role of political belief in the relationship between these variables.Design/methodology/approachThe statistical population of this research was the employees of public organizations in Isfahan, Iran. We conducted a two-wave lagged survey. The data were collected during the 2024 elections for the 12th convocation of the Islamic Parliament of Iran. This study used structural equation modeling to examine the proposed model.FindingsEmployees’ attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control positively impacted employees’ intention to engage in BallotLoafing. In addition, behavioral intention positively impacted actual BallotLoafing behaviors. Finally, the results showed that the political belief did not play a moderating role in the relationship between these variables.Practical implicationsManaging or reducing BallotLoafing involves addressing the key factors that influence such behavior: attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control.Originality/valueThis research introduces a novel concept: BallotLoafing, which captures employee distraction during elections.
Q2

Unveiling the nexus: exploring the collective social exchange dynamics of high-performance work systems in shaping organizational outcomes
shahzad K., Rasheed M.A., Faisal M., Hassan S.G.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the nuanced role of organizational “collectives” in transmitting the effect of high-performance work systems (HPWS) on organizations’ market success and workforce retention.Design/methodology/approachThe multi-source data was collected from 113 construction firms operating in Pakistan using a survey questionnaire.FindingsThe findings indicate that collective human capital and collective satisfaction of organizations differentially mediate the effect of HPWS on market success and workforce retention. Collective satisfaction mediates the effect of HPWS on both market success and workforce retention, however collective human capital only mediates this relationship for market success of organizations.Practical implicationsOrganizations should consider prioritizing investment in cognitive and affective development of overall human resources. Knowledge, skills, abilities and emotions of individual employees operate at the collective level so organizations should design HRM practices to manage collective thoughts and interpretations.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate human capital and satisfaction at the collective organization level to explore collective developmental and motivational paths for HPWS to boost organization strategic outcomes.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Research Papers in Education
566 citations, 3.55%
|
|
British Educational Research Journal
301 citations, 1.89%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
259 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Oxford Review of Education
203 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
167 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Curriculum Journal
158 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Cambridge Journal of Education
150 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
143 citations, 0.9%
|
|
British Journal of Sociology of Education
137 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Educational Review
127 citations, 0.8%
|
|
International Journal of Science Education
121 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Education Sciences
117 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Education 3-13
116 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice
109 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Education Policy
106 citations, 0.66%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research
102 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Educational Studies
96 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
86 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Professional Development in Education
86 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Further and Higher Education
75 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Studies in Educational Evaluation
73 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Education for Teaching
72 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Educational Research
70 citations, 0.44%
|
|
European Journal of Teacher Education
69 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Educational Management Administration and Leadership
69 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Teacher Development
68 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Review of Education
68 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Sport, Education and Society
66 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Cogent Education
65 citations, 0.41%
|
|
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
65 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Language and Education
64 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Sustainability
61 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Research in Post-Compulsory Education
61 citations, 0.38%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Studies
60 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Studies in Higher Education
56 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
54 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
51 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
51 citations, 0.32%
|
|
International Journal of Inclusive Education
51 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Teaching in Higher Education
50 citations, 0.31%
|
|
PLoS ONE
50 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Educational Psychology in Practice
48 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Studies in Sociology of Education
47 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Literacy
46 citations, 0.29%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Psychology
45 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Australian Educational Researcher
45 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Management in Education
44 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Social Psychology of Education
44 citations, 0.28%
|
|
System
44 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Physical Education Review
44 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Research in Science Education
44 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Educational Research Journal
43 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
43 citations, 0.27%
|
|
School Leadership and Management
42 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
42 citations, 0.26%
|
|
SAGE Open
42 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Higher Education
42 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Higher Education Research and Development
41 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Educational Action Research
40 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Thinking Skills and Creativity
40 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Improving Schools
39 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education
39 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Psychology in the Schools
38 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Gender and Education
37 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Linguistics and Education
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Journal of Special Needs Education
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Pedagogy, Culture and Society
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Computers and Education
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Compare
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Research in Science and Technological Education
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Irish Educational Studies
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Educational Research and Evaluation
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
33 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Comparative Education
33 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
32 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Pastoral Care in Education
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Policy Futures in Education
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Studies in Science Education
28 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Early Child Development and Care
28 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Educational Research Review
28 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Development
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Leadership in Education
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Curriculum Studies
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Journal of Education
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Educational Administration
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Language Awareness
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Heliyon
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
School Psychology International
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Current Psychology
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Language Learning Journal
25 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5943 citations, 37.22%
|
|
Springer Nature
1703 citations, 10.67%
|
|
Elsevier
1417 citations, 8.88%
|
|
Wiley
1321 citations, 8.27%
|
|
SAGE
1238 citations, 7.75%
|
|
Emerald
422 citations, 2.64%
|
|
MDPI
362 citations, 2.27%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
356 citations, 2.23%
|
|
IGI Global
203 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
135 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Oxford University Press
85 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
57 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
53 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
50 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
36 citations, 0.23%
|
|
BMJ
35 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IOP Publishing
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
SciELO
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Human Kinetics
27 citations, 0.17%
|
|
JMIR Publications
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
22 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
OpenEdition
20 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Australian Reading Association
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Inc.
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institut National de Recherche Pedagogique
14 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AIP Publishing
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
CAIRN
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
EDP Sciences
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Brill
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IntechOpen
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AOSIS
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scientific Methodical Center
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bristol University Press
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Portico
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SLACK
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Verlag Hans Huber AG
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Unisa Press
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Fundacao Carlos Chagas
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
UCL Institute of Education
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Academic Journals
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
British Psychological Society
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Nacional de Pos-graduacao e Pesquisa em Educacao
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Berghahn Books
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physiological Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Learning Technology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Personality Research
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow Polytechnic University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal College of General Practitioners
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bureau of Scientific Publications of the Foundation for Education, Science and Technology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
University of Cambridge
36 publications, 3.52%
|
|
University of Exeter
29 publications, 2.83%
|
|
University of Oxford
18 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Linköping University
14 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Warwick
14 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Ghent University
13 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
13 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Birmingham
13 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Nottingham
12 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University College London
11 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Durham University
11 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
10 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Helsinki
9 publications, 0.88%
|
|
King's College London
9 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Southampton
9 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Leiden University
9 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Cardiff University
9 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Utrecht University
8 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Leeds
8 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
7 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Newcastle University
7 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Sheffield
7 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Leicester
7 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Manchester
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Monash University
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Wollongong
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Macau
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Lancaster University
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Sussex
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of York
6 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Haifa
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of New South Wales
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Oulu
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Dundee
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Glasgow
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Auckland
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Groningen
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of East Anglia
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Bath
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Stirling
5 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Stockholm University
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Antwerp
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Parma
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Charles University
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Bristol
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Bamberg
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Reading
4 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Cyprus
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Open University of Israel
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Twente
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Turku
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Loughborough University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Nicosia
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of the West of England
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Mississippi State University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Plymouth
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Bath Spa University
3 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Cukurova University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Open University of Cyprus
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
European University Cyprus
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Uppsala University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tampere University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Geneva
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
2 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
University College London
8 publications, 4.4%
|
|
Ghent University
7 publications, 3.85%
|
|
University of Warwick
5 publications, 2.75%
|
|
University of Cambridge
5 publications, 2.75%
|
|
Monash University
5 publications, 2.75%
|
|
Linköping University
4 publications, 2.2%
|
|
University of Helsinki
4 publications, 2.2%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
4 publications, 2.2%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 2.2%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
4 publications, 2.2%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Haifa
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Nottingham
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Nicosia
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Wollongong
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Macau
3 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Twente
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Tampere University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Oulu
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Durham University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Birmingham City University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Charles University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Southern Queensland
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Swansea University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Leiden University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Groningen
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Higher Colleges of Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Open University of Cyprus
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
European University Cyprus
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Open University of Israel
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Qatar University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Tel Hai Academic College
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Malmö University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University West
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
East China Normal University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Turku
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Padua
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Guizhou Normal University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Trento
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Glasgow
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Otago
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Canterbury
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Waikato
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 357, 34.9%
United Kingdom
357 publications, 34.9%
|
USA
|
USA, 49, 4.79%
USA
49 publications, 4.79%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 46, 4.5%
Australia
46 publications, 4.5%
|
China
|
China, 36, 3.52%
China
36 publications, 3.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 34, 3.32%
Netherlands
34 publications, 3.32%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 26, 2.54%
Belgium
26 publications, 2.54%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 26, 2.54%
Sweden
26 publications, 2.54%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 18, 1.76%
Finland
18 publications, 1.76%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 17, 1.66%
Israel
17 publications, 1.66%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 17, 1.66%
Spain
17 publications, 1.66%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 16, 1.56%
Germany
16 publications, 1.56%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 13, 1.27%
Italy
13 publications, 1.27%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 1.08%
South Africa
11 publications, 1.08%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 10, 0.98%
Cyprus
10 publications, 0.98%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 9, 0.88%
New Zealand
9 publications, 0.88%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 9, 0.88%
Chile
9 publications, 0.88%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.68%
Austria
7 publications, 0.68%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 7, 0.68%
Canada
7 publications, 0.68%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.59%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.59%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.49%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.49%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.49%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.49%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.49%
Norway
5 publications, 0.49%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.49%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.49%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 5, 0.49%
Czech Republic
5 publications, 0.49%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.39%
UAE
4 publications, 0.39%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.39%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.39%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.29%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.29%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.29%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.29%
Greece
3 publications, 0.29%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.2%
France
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.2%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.2%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.2%
Iran
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.2%
Poland
2 publications, 0.2%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.1%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Antigua and Barbuda
|
Antigua and Barbuda, 1, 0.1%
Antigua and Barbuda
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.1%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.1%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.1%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.1%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.1%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.1%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.1%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.1%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.1%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.1%
Romania
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.1%
Japan
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Show all (17 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 62, 34.07%
United Kingdom
62 publications, 34.07%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 20, 10.99%
Australia
20 publications, 10.99%
|
USA
|
USA, 12, 6.59%
USA
12 publications, 6.59%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 12, 6.59%
Belgium
12 publications, 6.59%
|
China
|
China, 11, 6.04%
China
11 publications, 6.04%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 6.04%
Netherlands
11 publications, 6.04%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 4.95%
Finland
9 publications, 4.95%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 9, 4.95%
Sweden
9 publications, 4.95%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 8, 4.4%
Israel
8 publications, 4.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 3.3%
Germany
6 publications, 3.3%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 3.3%
Spain
6 publications, 3.3%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 5, 2.75%
Cyprus
5 publications, 2.75%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 5, 2.75%
Chile
5 publications, 2.75%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 2.2%
Canada
4 publications, 2.2%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 2.2%
New Zealand
4 publications, 2.2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1.65%
Italy
3 publications, 1.65%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 1.65%
Norway
3 publications, 1.65%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 1.65%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 1.65%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 1.65%
South Africa
3 publications, 1.65%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 1.1%
Poland
2 publications, 1.1%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 1.1%
Switzerland
2 publications, 1.1%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.55%
France
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.55%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.55%
Austria
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.55%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.55%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.55%
Greece
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.55%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.55%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.55%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.55%
UAE
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.55%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Show all (1 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
2 profile journal articles
McGinn Noel
PhD in Sociology, Professor

Harvard University
54 publications,
359 citations
h-index: 12
2 profile journal articles
Lakkala Minna
49 publications,
870 citations
h-index: 15