Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
Impact factor
1.7
SJR
0.807
CiteScore
3.9
Categories
Education
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Psychiatry and Mental Health
Areas
Medicine
Psychology
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1979-2025
journal names
School Psychology International
SCHOOL PSYCHOL INT
Top-3 citing journals

School Psychology International
(2253 citations)

Frontiers in Psychology
(534 citations)

Psychology in the Schools
(492 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Exeter
(25 publications)

University of Haifa
(23 publications)

University of Manchester
(23 publications)

Education University of Hong Kong
(8 publications)

Beijing Normal University
(6 publications)

Southwest University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 381
Q2

Lithuanian Petronyms in the Mythological Context
Zavyalova M.V.
The article examines the names of Lithuanian stones regarded as sacred and the legends associated with them. Researchers estimate that there are approximately 500 such stones in Lithuania. Popular beliefs link many of these stones with pagan deities and Christian saints, attributing to them the abilities to move, speak, teach, heal, advise, lend money, and even form families and have children. Evidence of stone worship during pagan times is reflected in their names, which often reference both chthonic figures and Christian saints, and may also be associated with the names of animals and people. The article systematically analyses these cases, considering legends about the stones’ origins, relevant historical evidence, and archaeological and folklore data. Lithuanian legends regarding the naming of stones suggest that those now bearing Christian names may have originally had pagan ones. The “baptism” of some stones by bestowing Christian names upon them not only alters some of their properties but is also believed to stop their growth and movement. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the mythological perception of stones has evolved over time. Historical data indicate that in pagan antiquity, stones were identified with deities, serving simultaneously as altars and idols. With the advent of Christianity, the focus shifted, and stones that were once venerated began to be associated with figures from lower mythology, such as the devil, witches, and Laumės (woodland spirits). Folklore traditions classify stones as “otherworldly” objects, emphasizing their connection with the chthonic realm, the world of the dead, and the “unclean”.
Q2

Nü Guo in Chinese Historiography: the Localisation of Tibetan “Women’s Kingdoms.” Part I: Possible Location of The Kingdom of Women in Eastern Tibet
Sokhina M.D.
Chinese texts from the 5th to the 11th centuries, including chronicles, treatises, encyclopaedias, and travellers’ reports, frequently mention both mythical and real states ruled by a line of female monarchs (referred to as Nü guo, “Kingdom of Women,” or Nü-wang guo, “Kingdom of a Woman King”). This study aims to localize those “Kingdoms of Women” situated in or near Tibet. In doing so, it addresses whether the macrotoponyms Nü guo and Nü-wang guo refer to actual or legendary regions. Analysis of the sources reveals that the chronicles describe Kingdoms of Women located on opposite sides of the Tibetan Plateau. By synthesising information from multiple disciplines, including extensive ethnographic material, the study identifies the geographical location of a Kingdom of Women in Eastern Tibet, within the Sino-Tibetan borderlands. In this region, matrilineal families, primarily composed of women and their descendants, were prevalent. Local architecture also displays a clear connection to the Kingdom of Women described in medieval Chinese documents. Additionally, a potential cultural parallel is found in the significant role of monkeys among the Qiang, a borderland ethnic group that maintained traditional beliefs. The findings suggest that the toponyms Nü guo and Nü-wang guo correspond to a real kingdom encompassing territories in the Daduhe and Yalongjiang river basins, located at the geographical and civilizational boundary between Tibet and China.
Q2

A New Study in Bosnian Onomastics. Review of the book: Turbić-Hadžagić A., Musić E., Haverić Đ., Muratović A. Bosanskohercegovačka prezimena (Vols. 1–3). Zagreb: Bošnjačka nacionalna zajednica za Grad Zagreb i Zagrebačku županiju, 2018–2023
Vujović N.
This paper provides a review of a comprehensive study of Bosnian-Herzegovinian surnames. It is a multidisciplinary research project that lasted from 2018 to 2023, involving several authors and publishers, resulting in three volumes. The results of the study under review are based on Bosnian-Herzegovinian and foreign archival material, birth registers, medieval and early modern inscriptions, charters, and contemporary population censuses. The reviewed volumes employ an adequate methodology which allows for systematic presentation of the results. Some shortcomings of the technical arrangement of the first volume were successfully eliminated in the following parts of the edition. Due to the abundance of material and insight into the chronological development of surnames as a category of anthroponyms, these books are of an immense importance for Bosnian linguistics. Additionally, beyond their onomastic value, these three volumes provide insight into the broader historical, religious, and cultural contexts, shedding new light on the complex ethnolinguistic contacts in that part of the Balkans, both in the past and today.
Q2

Sociocultural Landscape of the Pomor Coast of the White Sea through the Lens of Collective Nicknames
Kuchko V.S.
This article is based on field data collected in September 2023 by the Toponymic Expedition of Ural Federal University (Ekaterinburg). The research was conducted in several settlements along the Pomor coast of the White Sea in the Belomorsky District of Karelia, including Sumskiy Posad, Kolezhma, Lapino, and Belomorsk. The paper presents some of the expedition’s findings on how collective nicknames and related narratives reflect the region’s history, culture, and social, ethnic, and religious characteristics. The article examines the microsystem of local group nicknames used along a segment of the Pomor coast. These nicknames include repoedy from Shueretskoye, kochegary from Virma, meshchane and tserkovnye srali from Sumskiy Posad, lopari from Kolezhma, and tsari and vory from Nyukhcha. It also considers nicknames from inland villages near the Pomor and mainland border, such as repniki from Lapino, vshiviki from Korosozero, pisanye batogi from Pulozero, and lindushniki from Endoguba. The article notes the factors contributing to the prevalence of local names on the White Sea coast, particularly on the Pomor coast, compared to mainland regions of the Russian North and other traditionally agricultural areas. The study explores the motivations behind the nicknames that persist in the collective memory of the Pomor coast’s older residents (the expedition’s informants). It suggests explanations for several collective nicknames, describing the historical and sociocultural context in which and thanks to which they emerged, based on historical and ethnographic sources.
Q2

Bookshelf
Toorians L., Kabinina N.V., Falileyev A.I., Yasinskaya M.V.
Q2
Voprosy Onomastiki
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q2

“Onomastics sub specie Semiotics”
Zavyalova M.V., Ippolitova A.B.
Q2
Voprosy Onomastiki
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q2

Oikonymy of Eastern Kazakhstan (Districts of Altai, Glubokoye, and Katonkaragay)
Kassymova A.A., Mamyrbek G.M.
The article examines the oikonymy of East Kazakhstan, a region that has historically served as a hub for significant ethnocultural interactions, contacts, and conflicts. The study aims to identify the composition and systemic connections within the oikonymy of this region, focusing on the toponymic material from three administrative districts: Altai, Glubokoye, and Katonkaragay. The research draws on both contemporary and historical lists of settlements — published and archived — primarily concentrating on the names of non-urban settlements, which constitute the bulk of the region's toponymy. The oikonymy in the area under investigation is multilingual, featuring oikonyms of both Kazakh and Russian origin. Kazakh oikonymy is linked to the region’s historical nomadic, patronymic, socio-economic structure, while the emergence of Russian toponyms corresponds with various waves of migration into the region. These include oikonyms related to the initial migration wave in the 18th century, as well as those linked to subsequent migrations of Slavs during the late 19th and throughout the 20th centuries. It is crucial to distinguish whether the oikonyms belong to the earlier settlers (first wave) or later arrivals (second wave). To achieve this, the study employs chronological methods that, through a comparison of the modern characteristics of toponyms, help establish the time of their integration into the system. The authors conclude that the region’s oikonymic system reflects two opposing trends: the unification of oikonymy and geographical terminology on the one hand, and the preservation of traditional diversity on the other.
Q2

Keeping the Memory of the Past: Toponymic Space of Historical Circassia. Review of the book: Еmykova N. H. Istoricheskaia toponimiia Zapadnoi Cherkesii. Po materialam russkikh dokumentov XVIII–XIX vv. Chast’ pervaia: Abadzekhiia [Historical Toponymy of Western Circassia. Based on the Materials from Russian Documents of the 18th–19th Centuries. Part 1: Abadzekhia]. Maykop: Poligraph-Yug, 2021. 768 p.
Gubzhokov M.N.
The reviewed work represents the first instalment of a comprehensive project aimed at studying the historical toponymy of Western Circassia. This volume focuses on the geographical names of the Abadzekhia region. Since many of these toponyms have fallen out of use, their documentation, analysis, and interpretation rely primarily on the study of 18th and 19th-century Russian documents, including military maps, historical and ethnographic texts, and military and topographic descriptions of the area. Additionally, the author incorporates folklore references to geographical features of Abadzekhia. In total, approximately one thousand toponyms, encompassing both natural features and oikonyms, have been identified and mapped onto a modern representation of the North-West Caucasus. The dictionary entries, arranged alphabetically, consolidate all known spelling variants of each toponym, facilitating their semiotic reconstruction. Given the linguistic differences between Russian and Adyghe (Circassian), reconstructing the original pronunciation and etymology of the toponyms presents challenges. To address this, the author identified and utilised over five hundred Adyghe topographical elements frequently found in local place names. The work employs data and methodologies from various disciplines — linguistics, folklore, history, geography, ethnography, and archaeology — lending it an interdisciplinary nature. The scholarly apparatus of the publication, particularly the compilation of documents and literature, holds intrinsic value, offering a concise history of Circassian toponymy and providing a comprehensive overview of the book’s source material. This publication will undoubtedly be of significant interest to specialists in Adyghe toponymy as well as to local historians and guides.
Q2

Karelian Heritage in the Toponymy of the Pomor Coast of the White Sea
Mullonen I.I.
This publication presents findings from the collection and analysis of toponymic materials gathered during the 2023 expedition to the Pomor Coast of the White Sea. Karelian toponyms are featured here as a substrate element. Although they comprise only about 10% (approximately 300 names) of the total number of toponyms, they give the impression of a more substantial presence. This is primarily because they denote some of the most significant landmarks in the area, and also due to the prevalence of geographical terms in the local Pomor language derived from Karelian dialects. The specific distribution of terms such as kórga, índola, and sélga highlights the distinctive characteristics of the southern edge of the Pomor Coast, particularly the rural locality of Nyukhcha, which is connected to the Vygozero region. The study also discusses the gradual erosion of the Karelian layer in toponymy and the processes involved in adapting the original Karelian place names, which are often overlooked by researchers due to the difficulty in identifying them. One such process is folk etymological convergence, where a toponym is assimilated to a familiar Russian word, often with some phonetic changes (e.g., Gárye Lake > Gagárye Lake). This is a type of direct adaptation. Another adaptation pattern, calque or translation, is evident in the coexistence of pairs (or groups) of toponyms within a single micro-area, where one retains the original Karelian form, while the other is a translated version. This scenario has significant potential for etymological study. The paper suggests several such connections, including the name of Túmishche Island and the Kétmuksa River, which flows into the White sea near the island. Their joint analysis allowed the author to reconstruct the lost Russian term *tumishche (< Slavic *(s)tum-), meaning ‘shelter, a secluded place where one can hide or wait out bad weather’. This etymology is further supported by the river name Ketmuksa, which embodies the Balto-Fennic kätke- or Sami giet’k’ât, both meaning ‘hide, conceal’.
Q2

Celto-Venetica: Indo-European Names from North-Eastern Italy and the Dialectal Classification of Venetic
Prósper B.M.
This work tries to cast some light on a number of indigenous names of north-eastern Italy. It specifically addresses a selected number of names from Brixia and its environment, which lies in the west of Venetia et Histria, and close to the border of the Gallia Transpadana, covering an area that runs from the Oglio to the Adige rivers, around the Garda Lake. Most of these names have one thing in common: they are hardly ever found anywhere else, and, as a consequence, they have obtained a label: Jürgen Untermann called them Brescianisch, thus tacitly paving the way for considering them as a trace of an independent, unknown and unclassified dialect. That these names are not attested outside this area is not necessarily diagnostic of their not being Celtic or Italic, though the path leading to their classification may prove winding and indirect. Their etymology and attribution to either Celtic or Venetic will be thoroughly discussed. The study of the Venetic name fersimo comes to confirm the evolution of the complex superlative suffix *-is-m̥(H)o- > -izʊmo- > -īmo- is common to Sabellic and Venetic, where only the name meitima provided evidence for this change. Some misidentified or overlooked derivational and compositional patterns are addressed, such as the superlatives in -umus, the Celtic compounds in -gassi- and the probably both Italic and Celtic compounds whose first member is an Indo-European root-noun *ḱlu- ‘hearing.’ The personal names qverra, dievpala, endvbro, rvtvba, rvtvmanne, barbarvtae, aprofennivs are Venetic and decidedly bely the widespread notion that Italic did not preserve Indo-European compounds as personal names. The Celtic personal name vorvodisivs and the personal or divine name boxarvae are considered as belonging to a very ancient layer of Indo-European composition and, when possible, are connected to other compounds belonging to the same “semantic paradigms.” The analysis shows that it is premature to label these forms as Brescianisch — a new Indo-European dialect not attested in indigenous sources, which is in fact little more than a label for an onomastic landscape whose members are otherwise unattested but can be unproblematically linked to Continental Celtic and Italic.
Q2

Traditions and Transformations in Greek Anthroponymy (Based on the Field Studies of Greeks of Russia in 2022–2023)
Klimova K.A., Nikitina I.O.
The article is based on the field materials of three expeditions to the Greeks of Russia (territories of the Krasnodar Krai, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mineral Waters region). This paper analyzes the typological transformations that Greek given names and surnames underwent in different periods of history, as well as the peculiarities of naming among the Pontic Greeks. The historical and modern trends in the choice of a name are considered, as well as the features of the functioning of Greek surnames in different historical and social contexts (“Russification” of surnames during the period of repressions, reverse process of “Hellenization” when moving to Greece, morphemic translation of surnames from Turkic into Greek, etc.). Along with names that easily could be labeled as “Greek” (Nikos, Despina, Christos, Ellada, Athena, Euclid, Socrates), Greeks in Russia use “Russian” names (e.g. Maria, Elena, Pasha, Olya, Nadezhda) as well. It often turns out that these “Russian” names are hypocoristics of Greek ones: e.g., Olya from Olympiada, Pasha from Parthena. The paper also contains the description of the features of Greek anthroponymy in the field of traditional culture, such as the use of “double” names to protect one against the evil eye and “stopping” names designed to prevent the birth or death of children. The “Russification” of surnames and given names, as well as the use of Georgian names by Greeks during their residence in the territory of the Georgian SSR, are considered as strategies of ethnic mimicry, which were common among different ethnic groups in the USSR. At the same time, the reverse processes are characteristic of the last three decades: the return of “Greekness” to surnames and given names when obtaining a new citizenship, when installing tombstones, etc. Ever since the Soviet era, the Pontic Greeks have found the use of ancient Greek names that clearly indicate the ethnicity of the bearer, recently in the Caucasus it has become possible to baptize a child with this name in the Russian Orthodox Church.
Q2

Implicit Markers of Old Belief in the Onomastics of Karelian Pomorye
Вerezovich E.L.
This article draws on field materials collected by the Toponymic Expedition of Ural University, conducted in 2023–2024 in the Pomorye area of the Belomorsky District, Republic of Karelia. It examines collective nicknames such as oblivantsy (‘residents of the village of Sukhoye’) and lesovikibezmedniki (‘residents of villages and settlements in the south-eastern part of the Belomorsky region, including Endoguba, Vorenzha, Sumostrov, Pertozero, and Pulozero’). The study also explores phraseological units containing toponymic adjectives (e.g., face as / looking like hot Vyg copper, ‘about a flushed man’), and terms used for territorial groups with locative semantics that are similar to nicknames (e.g., poozery — pomory — lesoviki). Additionally, it includes various onomastic and appellative units, such as the names of sketes derived from lake names and the expression polumbrous hilozër, which features the quasi-katoikonym hilozër. The author interprets these linguistic elements as implicit markers of the Old Believers, who significantly influenced the historical and cultural landscape of the region. For example, the nickname oblivantsy is linked to the practice of dousing baptism practiced by the residents of Sukhoye, which the Old Believers viewed negatively. The phrase face like hot Vyg copper alludes to the tradition of crafting copper-cast icons among the Vyg Monastery inhabitants. The triad pomory — poozery — lesoviki is not only taxonomic (referring to the place of residence of the respective groups of people), but also reflects an evaluative opposition: the coastal inhabitants are economically and religiously contrasted with the Old Believers who retreated to the forests and lakes. Beyond reconstructing the semantics of these names, the author reveals the nominators’ perspectives embedded within them.
Q2

Restructuring Russian Christian Personal Names in the Pre-National Period: Names in -y
Ganzhina I.M.
This article is the concluding part of a series of articles investigating the derivation of the geographically limited system of Christian personal name forms during the pre-national period. Drawing on anthroponyms from Tver business texts of the 16th–17th centuries, it explores the structural reorganization of full male personal names in colloquial speech. The focus of the analysis is on the productive paradigmatic class *-jŏ, specifically full forms of anthroponyms with a soft base (ending in -y) in different variants: -iy, -ey, -ay, -oy. During the period studied, these colloquial full forms were highly diverse, with numerous phonetic and morphological variants. These variants primarily emerged from fictitious segmentation and formal alteration of the anthroponymic bases. At the same time, preference in documents is given to colloquial rather than canonical forms, which were used mainly by clergymen. The article identifies the word-formation mechanisms that facilitated the integration of foreign personal names into the Russian onomastic system, leading to the development of numerous colloquial full forms of names, particularly through structural reorganization and formal-associative relationships involving modifications to the final segment of the name. These structural transformations, combined with phonetic changes, create a unique anthroponymic pattern specific to each territory. The analysis reveals that in the 16th–17th centuries Tver documents, two forms of Christian personal names were particularly stable and frequently recurring: consonant-final truncated forms (e.g., Vlas, Nazar, Taras, Fedos) and forms ending in -ey (e.g., Vlasey, Nazarey, Tarasey, Fedosey).
Q2

Oikonymy of the Livvik Karelians
Kuzmin D.V.
The article investigates the settlement names in Southern (Olonets) Karelia, where the Livvik dialect of the Karelian language has been spoken for centuries. The study highlights that, in the early stages of settlement by Livvik Karelians, the development of villages was shaped by the region’s physical geography and the population’s way of life. Due to the abundance of lakes and rivers in Southern Karelia, early villages were mostly established along these water bodies. However, from the 18th century onwards, settlements began to develop on higher ground, leading to the formation of “settlement” type villages. The article focuses on the types of rural settlements and the structure of their names. The most common single-component names include oikonyms with the -l formant, typically derived from personal names. Less common are deanthroponymic patterns without a formant, and those with the formants -(i)ne, -sto, or the Russian -ovo and -shchina. Among other oikonyms, those based on geographical terms such as pogostu ‘village with a church,’ kylä and hieru ‘village’ are particularly prevalent. The study also identifies terms for smaller settlements and farmsteads, such as kodi, kondu, perti, and taloi, along with terms borrowed from Russian, like myza and khutor. The author examines why certain types of oikonyms are more common, the timeline of their adoption into the local toponymy, and the inclusion of reconstructed terms like moiživo and tula, which likely referred to small homesteads. The author concludes that the formation of the settlement system in Southern Karelia peaked in the early 20th century but began to decline with collectivisation and subsequent repressions, leading to the abandonment of many villages in the 1960s and 1970s.
Q2

Deanthroponymic Names of Ural Minerals: Word-Formation Patterns
Kostylev Y.S., Tikhomirova A.V.
The study investigates the nomenclature of Ural minerals derived from anthroponyms. The data was sourced from printed and electronic publications on geology and mineralogy. The aim of the research is to analyze the primary word-formation patterns evident in the lexemes of the compiled corpus, discern deviations from traditional word-formation patterns, and ascertain their underlying causes. The deanthroponymic model emerges as the predominant one for mineral nomenclature, constituting 38% of the total number of names analyzed. The second most prevalent model is based on toponyms (22%). Models wherein mineral names are derived from indications of their geochemical composition or properties exhibit significantly lower frequency compared to the two aforementioned models. The most prevalent method of forming deanthroponymic mineral names (mineralonyms) entails incorporating the surname of a notable figure associated with mineralogy, followed by the addition of the formant -it (less frequently, -lit) or -in. Departures from this model manifest in two ways. Firstly, atypical formants such as -an, -zit, -oit, and -anit are utilized, which may be categorized as phonetic-graphic variants or instances of contamination of productive formants. Secondly, deviations occur in the base of the mineralonym, whereby the generating unit is not solely the surname but rather its constituent parts (in cases where the surname is multi-component), as well as the inclusion of the first name, first name and surname, or the root part of the surname translated into Latin. It can be posited that in the use of formally atypical models and approaches to mineralonym creation, the subjective aesthetic considerations of the nominator play a pivotal role, driven by the desire to craft a harmonious and user-friendly term. Additionally, the evident intention is to mitigate homonymy and other instances of ambiguity that are incompatible with a coherent terminological system and hinder the unequivocal association of the name with the denoted object.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
School Psychology International
2253 citations, 8.76%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
534 citations, 2.08%
|
|
Psychology in the Schools
492 citations, 1.91%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
331 citations, 1.29%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
291 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Journal of School Psychology
265 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Child Indicators Research
219 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Educational Psychology in Practice
216 citations, 0.84%
|
|
International Journal of School and Educational Psychology
210 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Educational Psychology
199 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of School Violence
192 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Current Psychology
191 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
172 citations, 0.67%
|
|
School Psychology Review
170 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
163 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
159 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Child and Family Studies
155 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Journal of Adolescence
153 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Social Psychology of Education
147 citations, 0.57%
|
|
School Mental Health
137 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
131 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Aggressive Behavior
128 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Aggression and Violent Behavior
121 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Contemporary School Psychology
119 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Early Adolescence
108 citations, 0.42%
|
|
PLoS ONE
108 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
105 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Happiness Studies
101 citations, 0.39%
|
|
European Journal of Psychology of Education
99 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Child Abuse and Neglect
94 citations, 0.37%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Psychology
94 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Canadian Journal of School Psychology
90 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Learning and Individual Differences
89 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
84 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Bullying Prevention
83 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
82 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
80 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Education Sciences
78 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
77 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
71 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Educational Psychology Review
69 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Sustainability
68 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Applied Research in Quality of Life
67 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Inclusive Education
65 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Public Health
64 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Social Development
62 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Child and Youth Care Forum
61 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Pastoral Care in Education
60 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
60 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
59 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Child Psychiatry and Human Development
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Psychological Reports
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
56 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Applied School Psychology
56 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of School Health
54 citations, 0.21%
|
|
SAGE Open
50 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Children
50 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Journal of Special Needs Education
48 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Youth and Society
48 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Contemporary Educational Psychology
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Professional School Counseling
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Child Development
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Early Child Development and Care
42 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Early Childhood Education Journal
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Behavioral Development
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Adolescence and Youth
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Educational Studies
39 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools
38 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
38 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Educational Research
37 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Psychology in Africa
37 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
36 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
35 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
35 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Developmental Psychology
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Research Papers in Education
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Heliyon
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Educational Review
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC psychology
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
33 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Early Education and Development
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Support for Learning
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Research in Developmental Disabilities
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
30 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cogent Education
30 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
SAGE
4552 citations, 17.69%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4202 citations, 16.33%
|
|
Springer Nature
3832 citations, 14.89%
|
|
Elsevier
3102 citations, 12.06%
|
|
Wiley
2614 citations, 10.16%
|
|
MDPI
765 citations, 2.97%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
752 citations, 2.92%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
408 citations, 1.59%
|
|
IGI Global
405 citations, 1.57%
|
|
Emerald
269 citations, 1.05%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
167 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
136 citations, 0.53%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
103 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
99 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
81 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
75 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
63 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
61 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
60 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Oxford University Press
59 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
57 citations, 0.22%
|
|
BMJ
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
45 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
39 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
39 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
37 citations, 0.14%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AOSIS
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JMIR Publications
25 citations, 0.1%
|
|
CAIRN
25 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hans Publishers
25 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOS Press
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
British Psychological Society
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
National Assn. of Social Workers
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Universidade Sao Francisco
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasilia
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Psicologia Escolar e Educacional (ABRAPEE)
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Verlag Hans Huber AG
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Europe's Journal of Psychology
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Human Kinetics
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Guilford Publications
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Colegio Oficial de la Psicologia de Madrid
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EDP Sciences
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Medknow
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OpenEdition
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Tech Science Press
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brill
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Unisa Press
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Kamla Raj Enterprises
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bureau of Scientific Publications of the Foundation for Education, Science and Technology, 10, 0.04%
Bureau of Scientific Publications of the Foundation for Education, Science and Technology
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co, KG
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy Publication
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Personality Research
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ECN - Editora Cientifica Nacional Ltda.
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Annual Reviews
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Autonoma de Chile
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Exeter
25 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Haifa
23 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Manchester
23 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Alberta
23 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
20 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
20 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Utah
18 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Florida
17 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
16 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Bergen
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Brigham Young University
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Massey University
14 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
13 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
13 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University College London
12 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
12 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Macau
12 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Connecticut
12 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Cape Town
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Pretoria
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
North-West University
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Arizona
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Dundee
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Stavanger
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
North Carolina State University
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
McGill University
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Minnesota
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Sheffield
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Ottawa
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Kentucky
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Southwest University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Monash University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Queensland
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Western Australia
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Fordham University
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
8 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Curtin University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Flinders University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Columbia University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Virginia Tech
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Washington
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Georgia State University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
William & Mary
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Central China Normal University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
East China Normal University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Padua
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Dalhousie University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Wayne State University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Guelph
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Miami University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Cyprus
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Lisbon
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Lund University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Cagliari
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Birmingham
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Korea University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Patras
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Thessaly
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
East Carolina University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Calgary
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Alabama
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Texas State University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Nebraska at Omaha
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Memphis
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Bangor University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Tehran
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Zhejiang University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Florida State University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Qufu Normal University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Deakin University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
8 publications, 4.6%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
6 publications, 3.45%
|
|
Southwest University
5 publications, 2.87%
|
|
University of Macau
4 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Miami University
4 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Jiangsu Normal University
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
University of Cagliari
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
3 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Selcuk University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Cyprus
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Central China Normal University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
East China Normal University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Shenzhen University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Shanghai Normal University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Perugia
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Guizhou Normal University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Agder
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Pretoria
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of South Africa
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Korea University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Dankook University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Eastern Illinois University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Patras
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Fordham University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
William & Mary
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Gazi University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Istanbul Medipol University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Allameh Tabataba'i University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Istanbul Medeniyet University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Guilan
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Afyon Kocatepe University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Israel Ministry of Health
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Geha Mental Health Center
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ibn Haldun University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Haifa
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Jordan University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Al-Balqa Applied University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Al al-Bayt University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bern
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Mutah University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Northeast Normal University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Soochow University (Taipei)
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
National Taiwan University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Anhui Normal University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Minnan Normal University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Guizhou Minzu University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Messina
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Ferrara
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Qufu Normal University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Linyi University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Western Australia
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Curtin University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Wollongong
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
James Cook University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Central Queensland University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Dalhousie University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Mahidol University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 610, 31.8%
USA
610 publications, 31.8%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 226, 11.78%
United Kingdom
226 publications, 11.78%
|
China
|
China, 141, 7.35%
China
141 publications, 7.35%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 100, 5.21%
Canada
100 publications, 5.21%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 79, 4.12%
Australia
79 publications, 4.12%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 77, 4.01%
Israel
77 publications, 4.01%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 56, 2.92%
South Africa
56 publications, 2.92%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 46, 2.4%
Republic of Korea
46 publications, 2.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 35, 1.82%
Germany
35 publications, 1.82%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 34, 1.77%
Greece
34 publications, 1.77%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 34, 1.77%
Norway
34 publications, 1.77%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 29, 1.51%
Italy
29 publications, 1.51%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 23, 1.2%
New Zealand
23 publications, 1.2%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 1.04%
Netherlands
20 publications, 1.04%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 20, 1.04%
Turkey
20 publications, 1.04%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 18, 0.94%
Portugal
18 publications, 0.94%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 18, 0.94%
Spain
18 publications, 0.94%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 17, 0.89%
Sweden
17 publications, 0.89%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 17, 0.89%
Japan
17 publications, 0.89%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 11, 0.57%
Singapore
11 publications, 0.57%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 0.52%
Brazil
10 publications, 0.52%
|
India
|
India, 10, 0.52%
India
10 publications, 0.52%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 0.52%
Finland
10 publications, 0.52%
|
France
|
France, 8, 0.42%
France
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 8, 0.42%
Nigeria
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 8, 0.42%
Poland
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 8, 0.42%
Thailand
8 publications, 0.42%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 0.36%
Denmark
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 0.36%
Iran
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.31%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 6, 0.31%
Ireland
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.31%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.26%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 5, 0.26%
Cyprus
5 publications, 0.26%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.26%
UAE
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.21%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 4, 0.21%
Zimbabwe
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 4, 0.21%
Serbia
4 publications, 0.21%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 4, 0.21%
USSR
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.16%
Russia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.16%
Austria
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.16%
Venezuela
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.16%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.16%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.16%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.16%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.16%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.16%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 3, 0.16%
Czechoslovakia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 2, 0.1%
Albania
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 0.1%
Botswana
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.1%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Guam
|
Guam, 2, 0.1%
Guam
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.1%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.1%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.1%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.1%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.1%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.1%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.1%
Oman
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.1%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.1%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.1%
Chile
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.1%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 2, 0.1%
Yugoslavia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.05%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.05%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Virgin Islands, U.S.
|
Virgin Islands, U.S., 1, 0.05%
Virgin Islands, U.S.
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.05%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.05%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jersey
|
Jersey, 1, 0.05%
Jersey
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.05%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.05%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.05%
Libya
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.05%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.05%
Malta
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.05%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.05%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.05%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.05%
Romania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.05%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.05%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (54 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
USA
|
USA, 62, 35.63%
USA
62 publications, 35.63%
|
China
|
China, 36, 20.69%
China
36 publications, 20.69%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 13, 7.47%
Australia
13 publications, 7.47%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 5.75%
United Kingdom
10 publications, 5.75%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 8, 4.6%
Canada
8 publications, 4.6%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 8, 4.6%
Republic of Korea
8 publications, 4.6%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 3.45%
Italy
6 publications, 3.45%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 2.87%
Portugal
5 publications, 2.87%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 2.87%
Greece
5 publications, 2.87%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 2.87%
Netherlands
5 publications, 2.87%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 2.87%
Turkey
5 publications, 2.87%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 2.87%
South Africa
5 publications, 2.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 1.72%
Germany
3 publications, 1.72%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 1.72%
Japan
3 publications, 1.72%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 1.15%
Israel
2 publications, 1.15%
|
India
|
India, 2, 1.15%
India
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 1.15%
Jordan
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.15%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 1.15%
Cyprus
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 1.15%
Norway
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 1.15%
Singapore
2 publications, 1.15%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.57%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.57%
Albania
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.57%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.57%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.57%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.57%
Iran
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.57%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.57%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.57%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.57%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.57%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.57%
Chile
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.57%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.57%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.57%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|