Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2
SJR
0.484
CiteScore
2.8
Categories
Critical Care Nursing
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Areas
Medicine
Nursing
Years of issue
1980-2025
journal names
Critical Care Nurse
CRIT CARE NURSE
Top-3 citing journals

Critical Care Nurse
(620 citations)

Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
(482 citations)

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
(428 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Central Florida
(24 publications)

University of Pennsylvania
(24 publications)

University of California, San Francisco
(20 publications)

University of Central Florida
(18 publications)

University of California, San Francisco
(7 publications)

University of Southern California
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 337
Q2

Study on dynamic response of cushion layer-reinforced concrete slab under rockfall impact based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite-element method coupling
Mei X., Wu J., Wang T., Wang T., Liang X., Wang Y., Li B., Su T., Xu L.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
In the rockfall prevention and control project, the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and sand (gravel soil) soil cushion layer are commonly used to form the protection structure, thereby resisting the rockfall impact. Considering that the oversized deformation of the cushion layer under impact load using the finite element simulation cannot converge, this article establishes a numerical calculation model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics–finite-element method coupling (SPH–FEM). First, the standard Lagrange finite-element mesh is established for the whole model using ABAQUS, and then the finite-element mesh of the soil cushion layer is converted to SPH particle at the initial moment of the calculation, and finally the calculation results are solved and outputted. The results indicate that, compared with the results of the outdoor rockfall impact test, the relative errors of the rockfall impact force and the displacement of the RC slab are within 10%, which proves the rationality of the coupling algorithm; moreover, in terms of the numerical simulation, the SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more practical than the finite element for reproducing the mobility of the rockfall impacting the sand and soil particles. In addition, at an impact speed of less than 12 m·s−1, the cushion layer is able to absorb more than 85% of the impact energy, which effectively ensures that the RC slab is in an elastic working state under small impact energy and does not undergo destructive damage under large impact energy; the peak impact force of the rockfall is approximately linear with the velocity, and the simulated value of the peak impact force is basically the same as that of the theoretical value of Hertz theory; the numerical simulation is good for reproducing the damage process of the RC slab in accordance with the actual situation. The SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more justified than the FEM in simulating the large deformation problem, and it can provide a new calculation method for the design and calculation of the rockfall protection structure.
Q2

Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste fiber
Wang T., Cui S., Ren X., Zhang W., Yang X., Gong S., Yang D., Li B., Zhang W., Su T., Mei X., Dong X., Duan L., Ma Z., Cao X., et. al.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recycled concrete technology can promote the sustainable development of the construction industry, but the insufficient mechanical properties of recycled concrete have become a key constraint on its development. By adding waste fibers, the mechanical properties of recycled concrete can be improved, and the problem of disposing of waste polypropylene fibers can be solved. In this article, the effects of recycled brick aggregate content and waste fiber content on the mechanical properties and microstructures of recycled brick aggregate concrete through macroscopic mechanical experiments and microstructure experiments are investigated. The results show that the addition of recycled brick aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete; when the content of recycled brick aggregate is 100%, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decrease by 22.04 and 20.00%, respectively. The addition of waste fibers can improve the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete, but it is necessary to control the contents of waste fibers in a certain range. When the content of waste fibers is 0.08%, the best improvement effect on the mechanical properties of concrete is achieved; the compressive strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 6.06% (8.90%), while the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 2.30% (6.16%). Through microstructural analysis, the mechanism by which waste fiber improves the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete is revealed. The addition of waste fibers has the effect of strengthening the framework inside the recycled brick aggregate concrete, forming a good structural stress system and allowing the recycled brick aggregate concrete to continue to bear loads after cracking. In this study, waste brick aggregate and waste fiber are effectively utilized, which can not only reduce pollution to the environment but also realize the sustainable utilization of resources.
Q2

Coverage and reliability improvement of copper metallization layer in through hole at BGA area during load board manufacture
Zhu K., Xing R., Jiang Z., Zhong R., Chen L., Liu J., Miao H., Zhou G.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The dimple of ball grid array (BGA) area with 70 mm × 70 mm size on load board for high performance integrated circuit final test is investigated by shadow moire at first, the dimple of BGA area decreases from 184.3 to 97.1 μm when six additional prepregs with 60 mm × 60 mm size are added at BGA area before hot lamination process. The micromorphology and stress/strain simulation are conducted to improve the coverage and reliability of copper metallization layer in through hole at that BGA area. The microcracks of electroless copper layer at the position of glass fiber and inner layer copper pad, which leads to serious crack after solder float, are well covered by subsequent electroplating copper layer. When the through holes at BGA area with 0.2 mm diameter and 7.0 mm depth are fabricated based on insulating dielectric material used for high-speed signal transmission, the simulation results point out that IT968 is better than M6G for the thermal shock reliability of through hole metallization layer. A load board vehicle with 126 layers and 8.3 mm thickness based on IT968 shows good interconnection structure reliability after 12 times 288°C solder float.
Q2

Finite element analysis of deterioration of axial compression behavior of corroded steel-reinforced concrete middle-length columns
Nie R., Chen Y., Xing Z., Chen L., Yue Z., Chen W., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu S., Chen J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 8
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The corrosion problem of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns in coastal areas is becoming increasingly severe and needs to be solved urgently. This study established a numerical analysis model for SRC middle-length columns considering corrosion effects. The bond–slip constitutive relationship between corroded steel and concrete was established. It was found that when the rust rate is low, the bonding stress of SRC columns is slightly increased compared to those without corrosion. The ultimate and residual bonding stress will decrease significantly when the rust rate exceeds 1.5%. The comparison between the numerical analysis model and the experimental results shows that the establishment of the model is reasonable. Subsequent parameter analysis showed that for corroded SRC mid-length columns, the larger the slenderness ratio of the component, the faster the decrease in axial compression performance. The rust rate increased from 0 to 30%, and the axial compression performance of SRC columns decreased significantly. When the rust rate exceeded 30%, the axial compression performance of concrete columns tended to stabilize. A formula for calculating SRC middle-length columns’ ultimate bearing capacity considering corrosion effects has been proposed.
Q2

Effect of impurity components in titanium gypsum on the setting time and mechanical properties of gypsum-slag cementitious materials
Li Y., Jia Z., Li S., Li P., Jiang X., Zhang Z., Yu B.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The use of titanium gypsum instead of gypsum as a raw material for the preparation of gypsum-slag cementitious materials (GSCM) can reduce the cost and improve the utilization of solid waste. However, titanium gypsum contains impurities such as Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, which make its effect on the performance of GSCM uncertain. To investigate this issue, GSCM doped with different ratios of Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 were prepared in this study, the setting time and the strength of GSCM at 3, 7, and 28 days were tested. The effects of different oxides on the performance of GSCM were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy, energy spectrum analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The experimental results showed that Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 all had a certain procoagulant effect on GSCM and a slight effect on the strength. Through micro-analysis, it was found that the main hydration products of GSCM were AFt phase and calcium–alumina–silicate–hydrate (C–(A)–S–H) gels. Fe-rich C–(A)–S–H gels were observed with the addition of Fe2O3, and Mg(OH)2 and M–S–H gels were observed with the addition of MgO. The addition of TiO2 did not result in new hydration products from GSCM.
Q2

Research progress on Fe3+-activated near-infrared phosphor
Sun B., Zhang H., Wang Y.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 3
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Fe3+-activated near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials have attracted widespread attention due to their tunable emission wavelength and extensive applications in various fields such as plant growth, food analysis, biomedical imaging, and night vision. Many excellent NIR materials have been developed by introducing non-toxic and environmentally friendly Fe3+ ions into different inorganic hosts. This article elucidates the luminescent properties of Fe3+ ions by combining the Tanabe–Sugano energy level diagram and the configuration coordinate model. The latest research progress on Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials is outlined, summarizing the luminescent characteristics of various Fe3+-doped materials, including emission wavelength, emission bandwidth, quantum efficiency, and thermal stability. Particularly, a detailed summary and analysis of the application areas of Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are provided. Finally, the future prospects and challenges faced by Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are presented. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of the luminescence mechanism of Fe3+ and the research progress of iron ion-doped luminescent materials, aiming to develop advanced Fe3+-activated NIR luminescent materials with enhanced performance and explore new application fields.
Q2

Experimenting the influence of corncob ash on the mechanical strength of slag-based geopolymer concrete
Wang J., Qu Q., Khan S.A., Alotaibi B.S., Althoey F., Gamil Y., Najeh T.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The construction sector has been under growing public attention recently as one of the leading causes of climate change and its detrimental effects on local communities. In this regard, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed as a replacement for conventional concrete. Predicting the concrete’s strength before pouring is, therefore, quite useful. The mechanical strength of slag and corncob ash (SCA–GPC), a GPC made from slag and corncob ash, was predicted utilizing multi-expression programming (MEP). Modeling parameters’ relative importance was determined using sensitivity analysis. When estimating the compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of SCA–GPC with MEP, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.92 R
2-values were noted between the target and predicted results. The developed models were validated using statistical tests for error and efficiency. The sensitivity analysis revealed that within the mix proportions, the slag quantity (65%), curing age (25%), and fine aggregate (3.30%) quantity significantly influenced the mechanical strength of SCA–GPC. The MEP models result in distinct empirical equations for the strength characteristics of SCA–GPC, unlike Python-based models, which might aid industry and researchers worldwide in determining optimal mix design proportions, thus eliminating unneeded test repetitions in the laboratory.
Q2

Enhancement of hardness and wear strength of pure Cu and Cu–TiO2 composites via a friction stir process while maintaining electrical resistivity
Alnaser I.A., Yunus M.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to enhance the hardness and wear of copper and Cu–TiO2-based composites while maintaining high electrical conductivity through friction stir processing (FSP). It assesses the impact of TiO2 volume fractions and groove widths (GWs) on the wear, hardness, resistivity, and microstructure of FSPed Cu and FSPed Cu–TiO2 surface composite. The samples obtained from the stir zone showed an increase in microhardness of the Cu–TiO2 surface composite due to particle refinement, uniform distribution, and efficient sticking of TiO2 with Cu. Furthermore, the wear rate increased with decreasing TiO2 volume fractions in the composite. The worn surface microstructural analysis indicated a transition from harsh to gentle wear with increasing TiO2 volume fractions and GWs. The average grain size reduced significantly in reinforced stir zones compared to pure Cu, and particle size decreased further with increasing groove size. Hardness increased by 25 and 50% compared to unprocessed Cu, but only a negligible increase in electrical resistivity (2.3% Ωm) after FSP.
Q2

Effect of sand–precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer mortar with manufactured sand
Zhang P., Su J., Gao Z., Zhang T., Zhang P.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 11
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The geopolymer mortar (GPM) prepared from industrial by-products and alkali activation solution (AAS) is one of the hot spots of current building materials. As a feasible alternative to natural river sand, manufactured sand (MS) alleviates the global ecological pressure. In this study, MS was used for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution were used as AAS. Metakaolin (MK) and fly ash (FA) were used as the precursor to prepare MK-FA-based GPM with MS (MS-GPM), which was of great significance for saving non-renewable resources, mitigating the greenhouse effect, and recycling waste. Numerous studies were conducted to explore the effect of sand–precursor ratio (r
sp) on mechanical and durability characteristics of MS-GPM. Relationships between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength were established by linear fitting equation. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to systematically calculate the effect of r
sp on performance. The results indicated that the mechanical strength and impermeability of MS-GPM decreased and crack resistance increased with r
sp from 1 to 5. The strength of MS-GPM was the best when r
sp was 1. With the increase of r
sp, the proportion of MS in MS-GPM increases, and the relative cementitious material decreases, which has an adverse impact on mechanical properties and impermeability. Linear fitting revealed that the compressive strength of MS-GPM was closely related to tensile strength and flexural strength. ANOVA results indicated that r
sp in the range of 1–5 had great effects on the performance of MS-GPM. The aim of this article is to further promote the possibility of applying MS-GPM in practical engineering by designing reasonable r
sp.
Q2

Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete
Tian Q., Lu Y., Zhou J., Song S., Yang L., Cheng T., Huang J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R
2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
Q2

Grinding force model for ultrasonic assisted grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and experimental validation
Li Z., Yang S., Liu X., Xiao G., San H., Zhang Y., Wang W., Yang Z.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasonic vibration in the grinding process of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds can significantly reduce its processing difficulty. It is of great significance to understand the grinding mechanism of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and improve the processing efficiency by studying the mechanism of ordinary grinding of abrasive grains. Based on this, this study proposes a grinding force prediction model based on single-grain ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) chip formation mechanism. First, the prediction model of grinding force is established based on the chip formation mechanism of abrasive sliding ordinary grinding and the theory of ultrasonic assisted machining, considering the plastic deformation and shear effect in the process of material processing. Second, the UAG experiment of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds was carried out by using diamond grinding wheel, and the unknown coefficient in the model was determined. Finally, the predicted values and experimental values of grinding force under different parameters were compared to verify the rationality of the model. It was found that the maximum deviation between the predicted value of tangential force and the actual value is 23%, and the maximum deviation between the predicted value of normal force and the actual value is 21.7%. In addition, by changing the relevant parameters, the model can predict the grinding force of different metal materials under different processing parameters, which is helpful for optimizing the UAG parameters and improving the processing efficiency.
Q2

Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials
Guo C., Xu C., Xiao D., Cheng G., Zhong Y., Ding J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Multilayer adhesive bonded structures/materials (MABS) are widely used as structural components, especially in the field of aerospace. However, for MABS workpieces, the facts that the weak echo of the deep interfacial debonding defects (DB) caused by the large acoustic attenuation coefficient of each layer and this echo, which generally aliases with the excitation wave and the backwall echo of the surface layer, pose a great challenge for the conventional longitudinal wave ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods. In this work, an ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial DBs of MABS is proposed based on the ultrasonic resonance theory and the aliasing effect of ultrasonic waves in MABS. Theoretical and simulation analysis show that the optimal inspection frequency for II-interfacial DBs is 500 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 mm and the ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) thickness is 1.5 mm, and the optimal inspection frequency is 250 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 or 2.0 mm and the EPDM thickness is 2.0 mm. Verification experiments show that the presence of a DB in the II-interface causes a resonance effect, and in the same inspection configuration, the larger the defect size, the more pronounced this effect is. This resonance effect manifests itself as an increase in the amplitude and an increase in the vibration time of the A-scan signal as well as a pronounced change in the frequency of the received ultrasonic wave. In addition, the increase in the excitation voltage further highlights the ultrasonic resonance effect. Four imaging methods – the integrations of the signal and the signal envelope curve, the maximum amplitude of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal, and the signal energy – were used for C-scan imaging of ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS’s deep interfacial DBs and all these methods can clearly show the sizes and locations of the artificial defects and internal natural defect. The normalized C-scan imaging method proposed in this study can further highlight the weak changes in the signals in the C-scan image. The research results of this study have laid a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS.
Q2

Powder metallurgy processing of high entropy alloys: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Akinwekomi A.D., Bamisaye O.S., Bodunrin M.O.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Research attention in powder metallurgy (PM) processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) is rising. Some reviews have been published but a detailed historical analysis to identify the thematic research areas and prospective future research areas is lacking. Therefore, this study presents a bibliometric literature analysis of PM-processed HEAs by mapping and clustering 700 articles published between 2007 and August 2022 in the Scopus database. The most prolific authors, their collaborators, institutions, and most preferred journals publishing PM-HEA works are identified and mapped. Publication trend shows that significant research attention in the PM processing of HEAs began to gain traction in 2016. The top three journals in this field are Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials Science and Engineering A, and Intermetallics. However, co-authorship network analysis does not reveal significant inter-institutional research collaboration indicating that strengthening this area could help to accelerate scientific discovery, enhance technology transfer, and commercialization of HEA products. Based on the co-occurrence frequencies of author keywords, popular research directions are identified, and a systematic review of emerging functional applications is undertaken. This work provides a comprehensive visual reference guide for researchers to deepen their knowledge of this field and delivers insight into prospective future research opportunities to stimulate further ground-breaking works.
Q2

Marine polymers in tissue bioprinting: Current achievements and challenges
Banach-Kopeć A., Mania S., Tylingo R.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Bioprinting has a critical role in tissue engineering, allowing the creation of sophisticated cellular scaffolds with high resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. Achieving these parameters remains a challenge, necessitating bioinks that are biocompatible, printable, and biodegradable. This review highlights the potential of marine-derived polymers and crosslinking techniques including mammalian collagen and gelatin along with their marine equivalents. While denaturation temperatures vary based on origin, warm-water fish collagen and gelatin emerge as promising solutions. Building on the applications of mammalian collagen and gelatin, this study investigates their marine counterparts. Diverse research groups present different perspectives on printability and cell survival. Despite advances, current scaffolds are limited in size and layers, making applications such as extensive skin burn treatment or tissue regeneration difficult. The authors argue for the development of bioprinting, which includes spherical and adaptive printing. In adaptive printing, layers differentiate and propagate sequentially to overcome the challenges of multilayer printing and provide optimal conditions for the growth of deeply embedded cells. Moving the boundaries of bioprinting, future prospects include transformative applications in regenerative medicine.
Q2

Exploring the potential of agricultural waste as an additive in ultra-high-performance concrete for sustainable construction: A comprehensive review
Zhao J., Sufian M., Abuhussain M.A., Althoey F., Deifalla A.F.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
This study thoroughly reviews the recent design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) with agricultural waste. The goal is to identify UHPC composites that meets environmental sustainability requirements while fulfilling workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The capacity of typical review studies is limited in bridging the various literature aspects systematically. The article includes comparative analyses identifying these methods’ intrinsic connections and current trends. The analysis indicates that 71% of documents on incorporating agricultural waste into UHPC are in the “Engineering” and “Materials Science” disciplines, with 69% being journal articles, and 27% conference documents. Significant research keywords involve “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” “Cements,” “Sustainable Development,” and “Agricultural Wastes,” highlighting the extensive exploration of agricultural waste in UHPC. It has been discovered that agricultural waste can replace silica fume in UHPC, improving strength and durability by reducing pore volume and enhancing microstructure. Substituting 5–30% of cement with rice husk ash significantly boosts compressive strength, enhancing cement hydration, pore structure, and pozzolanic reaction, offering substantial environmental benefits and supporting the construction industry’s contribution to low-carbon sustainable development. This article provides guidance and recommendations for developing sustainable UHPC to meet diverse design specifications, promoting environmentally friendly construction practices.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Critical Care Nurse
620 citations, 3.46%
|
|
Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
482 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
428 citations, 2.39%
|
|
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing
271 citations, 1.51%
|
|
AACN Advanced Critical Care
271 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Nursing
266 citations, 1.48%
|
|
American Journal of Critical Care
261 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Nursing in critical care
249 citations, 1.39%
|
|
Australian Critical Care
248 citations, 1.38%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
175 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Critical Care Medicine
166 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
164 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
151 citations, 0.84%
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Studies
122 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Nursing
119 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Management
114 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Nursing Critical Care
108 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Enfermeria Intensiva
107 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Administration
106 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Care Quality
97 citations, 0.54%
|
|
British Journal of Nursing
96 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Nursing Clinics of North America
95 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Nursing Ethics
94 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Nursing management
92 citations, 0.51%
|
|
AORN Journal
89 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Emergency Nursing
89 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
88 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
88 citations, 0.49%
|
|
American Journal of Nursing
85 citations, 0.47%
|
|
AACN Clinical Issues Advanced Practice in Acute and Critical Care
83 citations, 0.46%
|
|
PLoS ONE
80 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing
79 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Clinical Nurse Specialist
78 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Progress in Transplantation
76 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
73 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
72 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Critical Care
67 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
64 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nurse Education Today
63 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
61 citations, 0.34%
|
|
BMC Nursing
60 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
56 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Practice
55 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Healthcare
54 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Nursing Forum
52 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Applied Nursing Research
50 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
50 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal for Nurses in Staff Development
48 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
47 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Education
47 citations, 0.26%
|
|
BMJ Open
46 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Critical Care Clinics
46 citations, 0.26%
|
|
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Critical Care
44 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pain Management Nursing
44 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Infusion Nursing
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Intensive Care Medicine
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Nursing Open
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Chest
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cureus
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
British Journal of Cardiac Nursing
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Nurse Leader
40 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Revista brasileira de enfermagem
39 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Western Journal of Nursing Research
39 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advances in Skin and Wound Care
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
38 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Advances in Neonatal Care
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Nursing Outlook
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nurse Education in Practice
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing
32 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Nursing Administration Quarterly
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Wound Journal
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nursing and Health Sciences
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Clinical Nursing Research
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nurse Educator
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Gerontological Nursing
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Neurocritical Care
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Journal of Infection Control
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Nursing Review
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Enfermería Intensiva (English ed )
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Transplantation Proceedings
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Professional Nursing
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Emergency Nursing
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Holistic Nursing Practice
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Vascular Nursing
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Reports
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of wound care
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
|
Elsevier
4370 citations, 24.37%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3073 citations, 17.14%
|
|
Wiley
2082 citations, 11.61%
|
|
Springer Nature
1197 citations, 6.68%
|
|
AACN Publishing
982 citations, 5.48%
|
|
SAGE
868 citations, 4.84%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
477 citations, 2.66%
|
|
MDPI
323 citations, 1.8%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
256 citations, 1.43%
|
|
SLACK
179 citations, 1%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
171 citations, 0.95%
|
|
BMJ
132 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
112 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
108 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Oxford University Press
105 citations, 0.59%
|
|
SciELO
103 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
101 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
90 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
70 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
62 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Emerald
59 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
52 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
46 citations, 0.26%
|
|
JMIR Publications
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
RCNi
35 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Oncology Nursing Society
33 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Medknow
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Hans Publishers
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Association of Military Surgeons of the US
21 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
S. Karger AG
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
15 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Lavoisier
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOP Publishing
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Korean Society of Nursing Science
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Joint Commission Resources Inc.
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Australian Society of Anaesthetists
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mallet Conseil
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tissue Viability Society
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society of Adult Nursing
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AOSIS
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physiological Society
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for Vascular Access
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brieflands
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society of Hospital Medicine
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AIP Publishing
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University Pub. Group
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CAIRN
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Practical Medicine Publishing House
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Index Copernicus
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Perioperative Practice
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Association of Social Workers Press
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Association of Fundamentals of Nursing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Central Florida
24 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
24 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
20 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Washington
17 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
12 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
12 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Kentucky
12 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
11 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
11 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Michigan
11 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
11 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Colorado Hospital
11 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Duke University
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Stanford University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco Medical Center
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yale University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Maryland Medical Center
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Southern California
7 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
7 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
7 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
7 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Yale New Haven Hospital
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Florida
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
6 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Minnesota Medical Center
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
St. John Fisher University
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Indiana University Health
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Children's National Hospital
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
5 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Georgetown University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Duke University Health System
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
UC San Diego Health
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Arizona
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Boise State University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Brigham Young University
4 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Tufts Medical Center
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
UCLA Health
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
San Diego State University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Rush University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Emory University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
East Carolina University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Temple University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Mayo Clinic in Florida
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Royal Philips
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania Health System
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Miami
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Florida Health
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Lurie Children's Hospital
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Utah Health
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Utah
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Westchester Medical Center
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Fairfield University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Sacred Heart University
3 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
University of Central Florida
18 publications, 4.19%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Southern California
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Kentucky
5 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Duke University
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Florida
4 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Mayo Clinic in Florida
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Boise State University
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Duke University Health System
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Emory University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
East Carolina University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Florida Health
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of North Carolina Health Care
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
St. John Fisher University
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Indiana University Health
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lurie Children's Hospital
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
2 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Koc University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Turkey
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Hadassah Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Sheba Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Israel Ministry of Health
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Rabin Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Rambam Health Care Campus
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Assuta Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Borås
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University Hospital of North Norway
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Putian University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Florence
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Carlo Besta Neurological Institute
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
George Washington University Hospital
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
George Washington University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Ajou University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Inha University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Duke Raleigh Hospital
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Yale New Haven Hospital
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
UCLA Health
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
UC San Diego Health
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Illinois State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
San Diego State University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Loyola University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Chicago Medical Center
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Ohio University
1 publication, 0.23%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 961, 26.63%
USA
961 publications, 26.63%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 20, 0.55%
Canada
20 publications, 0.55%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 13, 0.36%
United Kingdom
13 publications, 0.36%
|
China
|
China, 12, 0.33%
China
12 publications, 0.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 0.28%
Italy
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 0.19%
Australia
7 publications, 0.19%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.17%
Israel
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.14%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.14%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 4, 0.11%
Germany
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 0.11%
Netherlands
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.11%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 3, 0.08%
Afghanistan
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.08%
Greece
3 publications, 0.08%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.06%
France
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.06%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.06%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.06%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.06%
Japan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.03%
Russia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.03%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.03%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.03%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.03%
Spain
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.03%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.03%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.03%
Norway
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.03%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.03%
Poland
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.03%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.03%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.03%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.03%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.03%
Chile
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
USA
|
USA, 151, 35.12%
USA
151 publications, 35.12%
|
China
|
China, 6, 1.4%
China
6 publications, 1.4%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 1.4%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 1.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.7%
Germany
3 publications, 0.7%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 0.7%
Italy
3 publications, 0.7%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.7%
Canada
3 publications, 0.7%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.47%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.47%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.47%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.47%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.23%
Australia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.23%
Greece
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.23%
Israel
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.23%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.23%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.23%
Spain
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.23%
Norway
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.23%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.23%
Peru
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.23%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.23%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.23%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.23%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.23%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.23%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.23%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|