Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.7
SJR
0.579
CiteScore
3.1
Categories
Advanced and Specialized Nursing
Medical and Surgical Nursing
Areas
Nursing
Years of issue
1977-1979, 1982-2025
journal names
Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
J WOUND OSTOMY CONT
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
(3652 citations)

Advances in Skin and Wound Care
(871 citations)

International Wound Journal
(763 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Minnesota
(54 publications)

University of Alberta
(24 publications)

Emory University
(22 publications)

University of Minnesota
(5 publications)

University of Sydney
(4 publications)

Ghent University
(3 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 337
Q2

Study on dynamic response of cushion layer-reinforced concrete slab under rockfall impact based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite-element method coupling
Mei X., Wu J., Wang T., Wang T., Liang X., Wang Y., Li B., Su T., Xu L.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
In the rockfall prevention and control project, the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and sand (gravel soil) soil cushion layer are commonly used to form the protection structure, thereby resisting the rockfall impact. Considering that the oversized deformation of the cushion layer under impact load using the finite element simulation cannot converge, this article establishes a numerical calculation model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics–finite-element method coupling (SPH–FEM). First, the standard Lagrange finite-element mesh is established for the whole model using ABAQUS, and then the finite-element mesh of the soil cushion layer is converted to SPH particle at the initial moment of the calculation, and finally the calculation results are solved and outputted. The results indicate that, compared with the results of the outdoor rockfall impact test, the relative errors of the rockfall impact force and the displacement of the RC slab are within 10%, which proves the rationality of the coupling algorithm; moreover, in terms of the numerical simulation, the SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more practical than the finite element for reproducing the mobility of the rockfall impacting the sand and soil particles. In addition, at an impact speed of less than 12 m·s−1, the cushion layer is able to absorb more than 85% of the impact energy, which effectively ensures that the RC slab is in an elastic working state under small impact energy and does not undergo destructive damage under large impact energy; the peak impact force of the rockfall is approximately linear with the velocity, and the simulated value of the peak impact force is basically the same as that of the theoretical value of Hertz theory; the numerical simulation is good for reproducing the damage process of the RC slab in accordance with the actual situation. The SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more justified than the FEM in simulating the large deformation problem, and it can provide a new calculation method for the design and calculation of the rockfall protection structure.
Q2

Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste fiber
Wang T., Cui S., Ren X., Zhang W., Yang X., Gong S., Yang D., Li B., Zhang W., Su T., Mei X., Dong X., Duan L., Ma Z., Cao X., et. al.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recycled concrete technology can promote the sustainable development of the construction industry, but the insufficient mechanical properties of recycled concrete have become a key constraint on its development. By adding waste fibers, the mechanical properties of recycled concrete can be improved, and the problem of disposing of waste polypropylene fibers can be solved. In this article, the effects of recycled brick aggregate content and waste fiber content on the mechanical properties and microstructures of recycled brick aggregate concrete through macroscopic mechanical experiments and microstructure experiments are investigated. The results show that the addition of recycled brick aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete; when the content of recycled brick aggregate is 100%, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decrease by 22.04 and 20.00%, respectively. The addition of waste fibers can improve the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete, but it is necessary to control the contents of waste fibers in a certain range. When the content of waste fibers is 0.08%, the best improvement effect on the mechanical properties of concrete is achieved; the compressive strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 6.06% (8.90%), while the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 2.30% (6.16%). Through microstructural analysis, the mechanism by which waste fiber improves the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete is revealed. The addition of waste fibers has the effect of strengthening the framework inside the recycled brick aggregate concrete, forming a good structural stress system and allowing the recycled brick aggregate concrete to continue to bear loads after cracking. In this study, waste brick aggregate and waste fiber are effectively utilized, which can not only reduce pollution to the environment but also realize the sustainable utilization of resources.
Q2

Coverage and reliability improvement of copper metallization layer in through hole at BGA area during load board manufacture
Zhu K., Xing R., Jiang Z., Zhong R., Chen L., Liu J., Miao H., Zhou G.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The dimple of ball grid array (BGA) area with 70 mm × 70 mm size on load board for high performance integrated circuit final test is investigated by shadow moire at first, the dimple of BGA area decreases from 184.3 to 97.1 μm when six additional prepregs with 60 mm × 60 mm size are added at BGA area before hot lamination process. The micromorphology and stress/strain simulation are conducted to improve the coverage and reliability of copper metallization layer in through hole at that BGA area. The microcracks of electroless copper layer at the position of glass fiber and inner layer copper pad, which leads to serious crack after solder float, are well covered by subsequent electroplating copper layer. When the through holes at BGA area with 0.2 mm diameter and 7.0 mm depth are fabricated based on insulating dielectric material used for high-speed signal transmission, the simulation results point out that IT968 is better than M6G for the thermal shock reliability of through hole metallization layer. A load board vehicle with 126 layers and 8.3 mm thickness based on IT968 shows good interconnection structure reliability after 12 times 288°C solder float.
Q2

Finite element analysis of deterioration of axial compression behavior of corroded steel-reinforced concrete middle-length columns
Nie R., Chen Y., Xing Z., Chen L., Yue Z., Chen W., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu S., Chen J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 8
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The corrosion problem of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns in coastal areas is becoming increasingly severe and needs to be solved urgently. This study established a numerical analysis model for SRC middle-length columns considering corrosion effects. The bond–slip constitutive relationship between corroded steel and concrete was established. It was found that when the rust rate is low, the bonding stress of SRC columns is slightly increased compared to those without corrosion. The ultimate and residual bonding stress will decrease significantly when the rust rate exceeds 1.5%. The comparison between the numerical analysis model and the experimental results shows that the establishment of the model is reasonable. Subsequent parameter analysis showed that for corroded SRC mid-length columns, the larger the slenderness ratio of the component, the faster the decrease in axial compression performance. The rust rate increased from 0 to 30%, and the axial compression performance of SRC columns decreased significantly. When the rust rate exceeded 30%, the axial compression performance of concrete columns tended to stabilize. A formula for calculating SRC middle-length columns’ ultimate bearing capacity considering corrosion effects has been proposed.
Q2

Effect of impurity components in titanium gypsum on the setting time and mechanical properties of gypsum-slag cementitious materials
Li Y., Jia Z., Li S., Li P., Jiang X., Zhang Z., Yu B.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The use of titanium gypsum instead of gypsum as a raw material for the preparation of gypsum-slag cementitious materials (GSCM) can reduce the cost and improve the utilization of solid waste. However, titanium gypsum contains impurities such as Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, which make its effect on the performance of GSCM uncertain. To investigate this issue, GSCM doped with different ratios of Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 were prepared in this study, the setting time and the strength of GSCM at 3, 7, and 28 days were tested. The effects of different oxides on the performance of GSCM were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy, energy spectrum analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The experimental results showed that Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 all had a certain procoagulant effect on GSCM and a slight effect on the strength. Through micro-analysis, it was found that the main hydration products of GSCM were AFt phase and calcium–alumina–silicate–hydrate (C–(A)–S–H) gels. Fe-rich C–(A)–S–H gels were observed with the addition of Fe2O3, and Mg(OH)2 and M–S–H gels were observed with the addition of MgO. The addition of TiO2 did not result in new hydration products from GSCM.
Q2

Research progress on Fe3+-activated near-infrared phosphor
Sun B., Zhang H., Wang Y.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 3
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Fe3+-activated near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials have attracted widespread attention due to their tunable emission wavelength and extensive applications in various fields such as plant growth, food analysis, biomedical imaging, and night vision. Many excellent NIR materials have been developed by introducing non-toxic and environmentally friendly Fe3+ ions into different inorganic hosts. This article elucidates the luminescent properties of Fe3+ ions by combining the Tanabe–Sugano energy level diagram and the configuration coordinate model. The latest research progress on Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials is outlined, summarizing the luminescent characteristics of various Fe3+-doped materials, including emission wavelength, emission bandwidth, quantum efficiency, and thermal stability. Particularly, a detailed summary and analysis of the application areas of Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are provided. Finally, the future prospects and challenges faced by Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are presented. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of the luminescence mechanism of Fe3+ and the research progress of iron ion-doped luminescent materials, aiming to develop advanced Fe3+-activated NIR luminescent materials with enhanced performance and explore new application fields.
Q2

Experimenting the influence of corncob ash on the mechanical strength of slag-based geopolymer concrete
Wang J., Qu Q., Khan S.A., Alotaibi B.S., Althoey F., Gamil Y., Najeh T.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The construction sector has been under growing public attention recently as one of the leading causes of climate change and its detrimental effects on local communities. In this regard, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed as a replacement for conventional concrete. Predicting the concrete’s strength before pouring is, therefore, quite useful. The mechanical strength of slag and corncob ash (SCA–GPC), a GPC made from slag and corncob ash, was predicted utilizing multi-expression programming (MEP). Modeling parameters’ relative importance was determined using sensitivity analysis. When estimating the compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of SCA–GPC with MEP, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.92 R
2-values were noted between the target and predicted results. The developed models were validated using statistical tests for error and efficiency. The sensitivity analysis revealed that within the mix proportions, the slag quantity (65%), curing age (25%), and fine aggregate (3.30%) quantity significantly influenced the mechanical strength of SCA–GPC. The MEP models result in distinct empirical equations for the strength characteristics of SCA–GPC, unlike Python-based models, which might aid industry and researchers worldwide in determining optimal mix design proportions, thus eliminating unneeded test repetitions in the laboratory.
Q2

Enhancement of hardness and wear strength of pure Cu and Cu–TiO2 composites via a friction stir process while maintaining electrical resistivity
Alnaser I.A., Yunus M.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to enhance the hardness and wear of copper and Cu–TiO2-based composites while maintaining high electrical conductivity through friction stir processing (FSP). It assesses the impact of TiO2 volume fractions and groove widths (GWs) on the wear, hardness, resistivity, and microstructure of FSPed Cu and FSPed Cu–TiO2 surface composite. The samples obtained from the stir zone showed an increase in microhardness of the Cu–TiO2 surface composite due to particle refinement, uniform distribution, and efficient sticking of TiO2 with Cu. Furthermore, the wear rate increased with decreasing TiO2 volume fractions in the composite. The worn surface microstructural analysis indicated a transition from harsh to gentle wear with increasing TiO2 volume fractions and GWs. The average grain size reduced significantly in reinforced stir zones compared to pure Cu, and particle size decreased further with increasing groove size. Hardness increased by 25 and 50% compared to unprocessed Cu, but only a negligible increase in electrical resistivity (2.3% Ωm) after FSP.
Q2

Effect of sand–precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer mortar with manufactured sand
Zhang P., Su J., Gao Z., Zhang T., Zhang P.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 11
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The geopolymer mortar (GPM) prepared from industrial by-products and alkali activation solution (AAS) is one of the hot spots of current building materials. As a feasible alternative to natural river sand, manufactured sand (MS) alleviates the global ecological pressure. In this study, MS was used for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution were used as AAS. Metakaolin (MK) and fly ash (FA) were used as the precursor to prepare MK-FA-based GPM with MS (MS-GPM), which was of great significance for saving non-renewable resources, mitigating the greenhouse effect, and recycling waste. Numerous studies were conducted to explore the effect of sand–precursor ratio (r
sp) on mechanical and durability characteristics of MS-GPM. Relationships between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength were established by linear fitting equation. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to systematically calculate the effect of r
sp on performance. The results indicated that the mechanical strength and impermeability of MS-GPM decreased and crack resistance increased with r
sp from 1 to 5. The strength of MS-GPM was the best when r
sp was 1. With the increase of r
sp, the proportion of MS in MS-GPM increases, and the relative cementitious material decreases, which has an adverse impact on mechanical properties and impermeability. Linear fitting revealed that the compressive strength of MS-GPM was closely related to tensile strength and flexural strength. ANOVA results indicated that r
sp in the range of 1–5 had great effects on the performance of MS-GPM. The aim of this article is to further promote the possibility of applying MS-GPM in practical engineering by designing reasonable r
sp.
Q2

Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete
Tian Q., Lu Y., Zhou J., Song S., Yang L., Cheng T., Huang J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R
2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
Q2

Grinding force model for ultrasonic assisted grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and experimental validation
Li Z., Yang S., Liu X., Xiao G., San H., Zhang Y., Wang W., Yang Z.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasonic vibration in the grinding process of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds can significantly reduce its processing difficulty. It is of great significance to understand the grinding mechanism of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and improve the processing efficiency by studying the mechanism of ordinary grinding of abrasive grains. Based on this, this study proposes a grinding force prediction model based on single-grain ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) chip formation mechanism. First, the prediction model of grinding force is established based on the chip formation mechanism of abrasive sliding ordinary grinding and the theory of ultrasonic assisted machining, considering the plastic deformation and shear effect in the process of material processing. Second, the UAG experiment of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds was carried out by using diamond grinding wheel, and the unknown coefficient in the model was determined. Finally, the predicted values and experimental values of grinding force under different parameters were compared to verify the rationality of the model. It was found that the maximum deviation between the predicted value of tangential force and the actual value is 23%, and the maximum deviation between the predicted value of normal force and the actual value is 21.7%. In addition, by changing the relevant parameters, the model can predict the grinding force of different metal materials under different processing parameters, which is helpful for optimizing the UAG parameters and improving the processing efficiency.
Q2

Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials
Guo C., Xu C., Xiao D., Cheng G., Zhong Y., Ding J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Multilayer adhesive bonded structures/materials (MABS) are widely used as structural components, especially in the field of aerospace. However, for MABS workpieces, the facts that the weak echo of the deep interfacial debonding defects (DB) caused by the large acoustic attenuation coefficient of each layer and this echo, which generally aliases with the excitation wave and the backwall echo of the surface layer, pose a great challenge for the conventional longitudinal wave ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods. In this work, an ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial DBs of MABS is proposed based on the ultrasonic resonance theory and the aliasing effect of ultrasonic waves in MABS. Theoretical and simulation analysis show that the optimal inspection frequency for II-interfacial DBs is 500 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 mm and the ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) thickness is 1.5 mm, and the optimal inspection frequency is 250 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 or 2.0 mm and the EPDM thickness is 2.0 mm. Verification experiments show that the presence of a DB in the II-interface causes a resonance effect, and in the same inspection configuration, the larger the defect size, the more pronounced this effect is. This resonance effect manifests itself as an increase in the amplitude and an increase in the vibration time of the A-scan signal as well as a pronounced change in the frequency of the received ultrasonic wave. In addition, the increase in the excitation voltage further highlights the ultrasonic resonance effect. Four imaging methods – the integrations of the signal and the signal envelope curve, the maximum amplitude of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal, and the signal energy – were used for C-scan imaging of ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS’s deep interfacial DBs and all these methods can clearly show the sizes and locations of the artificial defects and internal natural defect. The normalized C-scan imaging method proposed in this study can further highlight the weak changes in the signals in the C-scan image. The research results of this study have laid a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS.
Q2

Powder metallurgy processing of high entropy alloys: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Akinwekomi A.D., Bamisaye O.S., Bodunrin M.O.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Research attention in powder metallurgy (PM) processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) is rising. Some reviews have been published but a detailed historical analysis to identify the thematic research areas and prospective future research areas is lacking. Therefore, this study presents a bibliometric literature analysis of PM-processed HEAs by mapping and clustering 700 articles published between 2007 and August 2022 in the Scopus database. The most prolific authors, their collaborators, institutions, and most preferred journals publishing PM-HEA works are identified and mapped. Publication trend shows that significant research attention in the PM processing of HEAs began to gain traction in 2016. The top three journals in this field are Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials Science and Engineering A, and Intermetallics. However, co-authorship network analysis does not reveal significant inter-institutional research collaboration indicating that strengthening this area could help to accelerate scientific discovery, enhance technology transfer, and commercialization of HEA products. Based on the co-occurrence frequencies of author keywords, popular research directions are identified, and a systematic review of emerging functional applications is undertaken. This work provides a comprehensive visual reference guide for researchers to deepen their knowledge of this field and delivers insight into prospective future research opportunities to stimulate further ground-breaking works.
Q2

Marine polymers in tissue bioprinting: Current achievements and challenges
Banach-Kopeć A., Mania S., Tylingo R.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Bioprinting has a critical role in tissue engineering, allowing the creation of sophisticated cellular scaffolds with high resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. Achieving these parameters remains a challenge, necessitating bioinks that are biocompatible, printable, and biodegradable. This review highlights the potential of marine-derived polymers and crosslinking techniques including mammalian collagen and gelatin along with their marine equivalents. While denaturation temperatures vary based on origin, warm-water fish collagen and gelatin emerge as promising solutions. Building on the applications of mammalian collagen and gelatin, this study investigates their marine counterparts. Diverse research groups present different perspectives on printability and cell survival. Despite advances, current scaffolds are limited in size and layers, making applications such as extensive skin burn treatment or tissue regeneration difficult. The authors argue for the development of bioprinting, which includes spherical and adaptive printing. In adaptive printing, layers differentiate and propagate sequentially to overcome the challenges of multilayer printing and provide optimal conditions for the growth of deeply embedded cells. Moving the boundaries of bioprinting, future prospects include transformative applications in regenerative medicine.
Q2

Exploring the potential of agricultural waste as an additive in ultra-high-performance concrete for sustainable construction: A comprehensive review
Zhao J., Sufian M., Abuhussain M.A., Althoey F., Deifalla A.F.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
This study thoroughly reviews the recent design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) with agricultural waste. The goal is to identify UHPC composites that meets environmental sustainability requirements while fulfilling workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The capacity of typical review studies is limited in bridging the various literature aspects systematically. The article includes comparative analyses identifying these methods’ intrinsic connections and current trends. The analysis indicates that 71% of documents on incorporating agricultural waste into UHPC are in the “Engineering” and “Materials Science” disciplines, with 69% being journal articles, and 27% conference documents. Significant research keywords involve “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” “Cements,” “Sustainable Development,” and “Agricultural Wastes,” highlighting the extensive exploration of agricultural waste in UHPC. It has been discovered that agricultural waste can replace silica fume in UHPC, improving strength and durability by reducing pore volume and enhancing microstructure. Substituting 5–30% of cement with rice husk ash significantly boosts compressive strength, enhancing cement hydration, pore structure, and pozzolanic reaction, offering substantial environmental benefits and supporting the construction industry’s contribution to low-carbon sustainable development. This article provides guidance and recommendations for developing sustainable UHPC to meet diverse design specifications, promoting environmentally friendly construction practices.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
3652 citations, 16.08%
|
|
Advances in Skin and Wound Care
871 citations, 3.84%
|
|
International Wound Journal
763 citations, 3.36%
|
|
British Journal of Nursing
626 citations, 2.76%
|
|
Journal of Tissue Viability
610 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Journal of wound care
604 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Nursing
435 citations, 1.92%
|
|
Gastrointestinal Nursing
304 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
229 citations, 1.01%
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Studies
207 citations, 0.91%
|
|
British Journal of Community Nursing
172 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Wound Repair and Regeneration
134 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Neurourology and Urodynamics
127 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
122 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
105 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
105 citations, 0.46%
|
|
BMJ Open
103 citations, 0.45%
|
|
PLoS ONE
90 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Colorectal Disease
89 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Advances in Wound Care
85 citations, 0.37%
|
|
American Journal of Nursing
84 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Nursing Open
82 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nursing
79 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Urological Nursing
77 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cureus
72 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
71 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
71 citations, 0.31%
|
|
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
70 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Urogynecology Journal
69 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
66 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Nursing in critical care
65 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Healthcare
65 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Revista brasileira de enfermagem
63 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Gerontological Nursing
61 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Journal of Critical Care
61 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
60 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nursing and Residential Care
59 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Scientific Reports
58 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Australian Critical Care
58 citations, 0.26%
|
|
AORN Journal
57 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Supportive Care in Cancer
56 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Texto e Contexto Enfermagem
53 citations, 0.23%
|
|
BMC Nursing
50 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Nursing Care Quality
48 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geriatric Nursing
48 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
48 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Critical Care Nurse
48 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Practice
46 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Home healthcare now
46 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Coloproctology
45 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Enfermeria Clinica
44 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
44 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
44 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nursing management
40 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
39 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
37 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
37 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nursing Clinics of North America
37 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Nursing Research
36 citations, 0.16%
|
|
British Journal of Dermatology
36 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cancer Nursing
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Rehabilitation Nursing
34 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Home Healthcare Nurse
34 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
33 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Psycho-Oncology
33 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
32 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Spinal Cord
32 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Qualitative Health Research
30 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Aquichan
30 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Continence
30 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
29 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SAGE Open Nursing
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Urology
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Skin Research and Technology
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Research in Nursing and Health
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Surgical Clinics of North America
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Clinical Nursing Research
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Vascular Nursing
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Techniques in Coloproctology
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Journal of Infection Control
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
JDDG - Journal of the German Society of Dermatology
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Heliyon
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
25 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Trials
25 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Burns
25 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Patient Safety
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Burn Care and Research
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International journal of older people nursing
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Coloproctology
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Collegian
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5894 citations, 25.96%
|
|
Wiley
3438 citations, 15.14%
|
|
Elsevier
2997 citations, 13.2%
|
|
Springer Nature
1712 citations, 7.54%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
1632 citations, 7.19%
|
|
SAGE
609 citations, 2.68%
|
|
MDPI
580 citations, 2.55%
|
|
Tissue Viability Society
467 citations, 2.06%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
457 citations, 2.01%
|
|
RCNi
319 citations, 1.4%
|
|
BMJ
177 citations, 0.78%
|
|
SciELO
170 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
150 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
148 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Oxford University Press
144 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
140 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
120 citations, 0.53%
|
|
AACN Publishing
119 citations, 0.52%
|
|
JMIR Publications
105 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
101 citations, 0.44%
|
|
SLACK
98 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
81 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
51 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
48 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
46 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
46 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
42 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
40 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Medknow
35 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
34 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Universidad de La Sabana
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
30 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IntechOpen
29 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Emerald
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hacettepe Universitesi Hemsirelik Fakultesi Dergisi
28 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Oncology Nursing Society
27 citations, 0.12%
|
|
S. Karger AG
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
22 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Parana
21 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
20 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
19 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Korean Society of Nursing Science
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
17 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mallet Conseil
16 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOP Publishing
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Korean Society of Adult Nursing
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Joint Commission Resources Inc.
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
14 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
14 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Japan Society of Coloproctology
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AOSIS
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Spinal Injury Association
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
XMLink
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Russian Association of Coloproctology
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IGI Global
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Innovative Healthcare Institute
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Physiological Society
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Kragujevac
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Surgical Society
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Chinese Nursing Research
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Hospital Medicine
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Impact Journals
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacja Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American College of Physicians
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Shanghai Jiaotong University Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia/Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
University of Minnesota
54 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Alberta
24 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Emory University
22 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
20 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Chicago
18 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Wayne State University
15 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Indiana University Health
11 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Arizona
10 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
10 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
9 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
9 publications, 0.13%
|
|
La Salle University
8 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Ghent University
7 publications, 0.1%
|
|
University of Washington
7 publications, 0.1%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Tokyo
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
City of Hope National Medical Center
6 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Southampton
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Deakin University
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Purdue University
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Florida
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.07%
|
|
King's College London
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Griffith University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Boston University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Korea University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Duke University Health System
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of California, Davis
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Medical Center
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania Health System
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
San Jose State University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Ege University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Ondokuz Mayis University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Gaziosmanpasa University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Başkent University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Turkish Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Örebro University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of Udine
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Rush University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
De La Salle University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of South Florida
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Fairview Health Services
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of Rochester
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
East Tennessee State University
3 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Koc University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Imam Khomeini Hospital
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Jilin University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Inonu University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Uppsala University Hospital
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Borås
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Jiangnan University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Western Sydney University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Milan
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Fu Jen Catholic University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Townsville University Hospital
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Prince Charles Hospital
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Jilin University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Turkish Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Örebro University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Jiangnan University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Griffith University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Lakehead University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Indiana University Health
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of South Alabama
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Gazi University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Turkey
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Selcuk University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Ondokuz Mayis University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Imam Khomeini Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Başkent University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
King's College London
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Southern Medical University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Dalian University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Fu Jen Catholic University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Taipei Medical University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Trento
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hospital San Martino
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Udine
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Otago
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Massey University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Wollongong
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hunter New England Local Health District
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Prince Charles Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Korea University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Duke University Health System
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Illinois State University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Rush University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Chicago Medical Center
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hasselt University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Michigan
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Guangxi Medical University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
McMaster University Medical Centre
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hamilton Health Sciences
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
McMaster University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
National Ageing Research Institute
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Emory University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Shinshu University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Medical University of Lodz
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Toho University Medical Center Sakura Hospital
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Toronto
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Florida International University
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Florida
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of Cantabria
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
USA
|
USA, 787, 11.15%
USA
787 publications, 11.15%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 80, 1.13%
Canada
80 publications, 1.13%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 38, 0.54%
Australia
38 publications, 0.54%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 37, 0.52%
United Kingdom
37 publications, 0.52%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 32, 0.45%
Turkey
32 publications, 0.45%
|
China
|
China, 29, 0.41%
China
29 publications, 0.41%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 17, 0.24%
Brazil
17 publications, 0.24%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 15, 0.21%
Republic of Korea
15 publications, 0.21%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 15, 0.21%
Sweden
15 publications, 0.21%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 0.18%
Japan
13 publications, 0.18%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 10, 0.14%
Spain
10 publications, 0.14%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 10, 0.14%
Italy
10 publications, 0.14%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 0.11%
Belgium
8 publications, 0.11%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 7, 0.1%
Netherlands
7 publications, 0.1%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 0.08%
Denmark
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.08%
Iran
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.07%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.07%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.04%
Germany
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.04%
Israel
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Liberia
|
Liberia, 3, 0.04%
Liberia
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.04%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.04%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.03%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.03%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.03%
Oman
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.03%
Poland
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.03%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.03%
Finland
2 publications, 0.03%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.03%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.01%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.01%
Greece
1 publication, 0.01%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.01%
India
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.01%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.01%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.01%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 109, 20.92%
USA
109 publications, 20.92%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 17, 3.26%
Canada
17 publications, 3.26%
|
China
|
China, 15, 2.88%
China
15 publications, 2.88%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 8, 1.54%
Australia
8 publications, 1.54%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 1.54%
United Kingdom
8 publications, 1.54%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 1.54%
Spain
8 publications, 1.54%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 1.34%
Turkey
7 publications, 1.34%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 1.15%
Brazil
6 publications, 1.15%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.96%
Italy
5 publications, 0.96%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.77%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.77%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.58%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.58%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.38%
Iran
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.38%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.38%
Japan
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.19%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.19%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.19%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.19%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.19%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.19%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.19%
Poland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.19%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.19%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.19%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.19%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
1 profile journal article
Liu Ming
33 publications,
316 citations
h-index: 9