Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.7
SJR
1.074
CiteScore
7.3
Categories
Applied Mathematics
Condensed Matter Physics
Mathematical Physics
Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Areas
Mathematics
Physics and Astronomy
Years of issue
1980-2025
journal names
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
PHYSICA D
Top-3 citing journals

Physical Review E
(17840 citations)

Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
(15547 citations)

Chaos
(8505 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Los Alamos National Laboratory
(283 publications)

University of Arizona
(149 publications)

University of California, Berkeley
(118 publications)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(23 publications)

Imperial College London
(19 publications)

Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(17 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 395
Q3

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of solite RE black and HyFlex remover systems for endodontic retreatment - An in vitro nano-computed tomography analysis
Valan A.S., Solete P., Antony S.D., Ramamoorthi S., Alasqah M., Arunachalam V.
Abstract
Introduction:
The successful outcome of endodontic retreatment heavily relies on the thorough removal of root canal filling materials. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the efficacy of various retreatment file systems using nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) imaging.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty recently extracted human mandibular molars with mesial roots having curvatures <20° were chosen and sectioned to 16 mm in length. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Gold system up to size F2 and they were filled with gutta percha and AH Plus sealer. After obturation, all the samples were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 15 each) for retreatment: Group 1 utilized Solite RE Black retreatment files, while Group 2 employed Coltene HyFlex Remover files. Nano-CT imaging was employed to measure pre- and postoperative volumes of remaining filling material and remaining dentin thickness and the time taken for retreatment was measured in seconds. The obtained values were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05).
Results:
Nano-CT analysis showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the volume of remaining filling material between the Solite RE Black and Coltene HyFlex Remover groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the time required for gutta-percha removal. The Solite RE Black system showed comparatively less dentin removal than the Coltene HyFlex Remover system (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The Solite RE Black retreatment file system demonstrated promising efficacy in removing filling material while preserving dentin integrity compared to the Coltene HyFlex Remover system. These findings support its potential as an effective tool for endodontic retreatment, emphasizing the need for further clinical trials to validate its performance across various clinical scenarios.
Q3

Evaluating generative pretraining transformer reliability in addressing dental trauma: A cross-sectional observational study on avulsion and intrusion
Bordin R.W., Bartnack C.C., Westphalen V.P., Gasparello G.G., Bark M.J., Gava T.N., Tanaka O.M.
Abstract
Introduction:
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized digital communication, enhancing interactions between humans and computers. This study explores the application of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5), in providing accurate information on dental trauma.
Materials and Methods:
Utilizing a dataset of 45 self-generated questions across three topics, general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion, ChatGPT-3.5 generated responses that were subsequently evaluated by five endodontic experts, each with over a decade of experience. The evaluators used a Likert scale to assess the quality of the AI-generated answers, synthesizing reliable scientific evidence and clinical expertise to ensure a thorough analysis. The data obtained from the evaluators’ scores were organized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25. For each question, descriptive statistics including the median and interquartile range were computed.
Results:
The study found that ChatGPT provided reliable information across the three assessed dental topics. Avulsion was rated the highest (4.40 ± 0.717), significantly outperforming general dental trauma (3.97 ± 0.885) (P = 0.005). Intrusion received a rating of 4.13 ± 0.794, showing no significant difference compared to the other topics. Most evaluator scores fell into the “Good” (44.0%) and “Very Good” (38.7%) categories. This indicates a generally positive appraisal of ChatGPT’s performance, with a fair agreement among evaluators, evidenced by a combined Fleiss’s kappa coefficient of 0.324. However, there was variability, particularly with Evaluator 4’s scores differing significantly from those of evaluators 1 and 2.
Conclusions:
ChatGPT’s responses on general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion were generally rated positively, with avulsion responses deemed the most reliable. The study underscores the need for continuous evaluation to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and safety of AI-generated content in endodontics, suggesting AI should serve as a supplementary tool rather than a primary information source.
Q3

Agreement between students’ self/peer and faculty assessments of the radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses
Awooda E.M., Elzaki W.M., Al-Nazhan S.A.
Abstract
Introduction:
This study investigated the agreement between students’ self-assessment or peer assessment and faculty assessment of the quality of root canal treatment (RCT) performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses.
Materials and Methods:
This cross-sectional study enrolled 23 4th-year students and a faculty member from the University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Sudan. The radiographic technical quality of RCTs performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses was evaluated by the students themselves, their peers, and faculty members in terms of the obturation length, shape, and density. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare self-peer and faculty assessments. P < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
Results:
No statistically significant differences were observed among the three assessment groups in terms of the quality of RCTs performed during the preclinical course. However, statistically significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments (P = 0.014), and between self- and faculty assessments (P = 0.005), which may be attributable to lower confidence among students when working on real patients, leading to lower self-assessment scores.
Conclusion:
Significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments and faculty assessments in the quality of RCT performed during the clinical course, with students underrating their performance. Formative assessment of learning rather than summative assessment, during endodontic courses, is recommended at the end of academic year.
Q3

Persistent pain in maxillary premolars following root canal treatment with apical transportation: A report of two cases without periapical pathology
Ong T.K.
Abstract
Persistent pain after endodontic treatment is often associated with evidence of periapical pathology. Nonetheless, this case report presents two instances of persistent pain in maxillary premolars post root canal treatment (RCT), without evident periapical radiolucency on imaging. A 35-year-old Asian female experienced dull, aching pain on biting in tooth #25, whereas a 40-year-old Caucasian female reported similar symptoms in tooth #15. Both teeth showed tenderness to percussion but not palpation. Periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans revealed completed RCT with apical transportation but no detectable periapical pathology. Thus, both teeth were diagnosed as previously treated with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Non-surgical retreatment successfully addressed untreated canal spaces, resolving symptoms. This report suggested persistent pain following RCT might stem from endodontic reasons, even in the absence of visible apical pathology on CBCT scans, highlighting the importance of thorough canal debridement to resolve symptoms associated with untreated canal spaces in apical transportation. Furthermore, this case report demonstrates that clinicians should make a diagnosis through thorough dental history and other clinical investigations, without relying solely on CBCT for the diagnosis of posttreatment endodontic pain.
Q3

Tampon approach in vital pulp therapy: Advancing endodontic care for permanent dentition
Asgary S.
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Comprehensive management of complex resorptive lesions: Report of two cases
Ray A.B., Mayya A., Ghosh S., Rai N., Acharya S.R., Chatra A., Shettigar L.S.
Abstract
In the field of endodontics, the management of complex resorptive lesions demands innovative and precise interventions. This report delineates the comprehensive management of two distinct cases, each presenting unique challenges. The first case involved a 23-year-old male with hypothyroidism, presenting with pain and external cervical resorption with internal communication in his lower left front tooth. The case was diagnosed with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The second case involved a 26-year-old female in good health, dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance, and experiencing occasional pain from a previously treated upper front tooth with concurrent external apical and internal resorption. It was diagnosed as previously treated, with symptomatic apical periodontitis. These cases were notable for their complexity and the tailored approach to diagnosis and treatment, employing advanced techniques and materials, such as bioceramic materials, for optimal outcomes. The first case was approached through conventional endodontic disinfection, flap reflection, and the meticulous external management of the resorptive defect with bioceramic material, followed by restorative procedures. The second case required retreatment, including wide canal management, apex negotiation, and the establishment of an apical plug with bioceramic material, culminating in backfilling with thermoplasticized gutta-percha and subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. Remarkably, both cases demonstrated successful healing and patient satisfaction at a 6-month follow-up, with radiographs and photographs evidencing the desired clinical outcomes. This report highlights the necessity of adaptability, precision, and the integration of innovative materials and techniques in endodontic practice to effectively address complex resorptive lesions. It underscores the significance of a comprehensive diagnostic and treatment framework that can guide clinical decision-making and enhance procedural outcomes in similar challenging scenarios. It contributes valuable insights and reinforces the imperative of detailed management in endodontic complexities.
Q3

A narrative review on applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics
Javed M.Q., Ali A.
Abstract
Nanotechnology in modern endodontics involves manipulating materials at the nanoscale to improve dental treatments, disinfection, imaging, and tissue engineering. This narrative review aims to evaluate the impact and applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics, focusing on advancements in materials, disinfection processes, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering while addressing associated challenges and safety concerns. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2024 across PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, COCHRANE Library, and Science Direct databases using MeSH terms/keywords such as “Nanotechnology,” “Endodontics,” “Disinfection,” and “Dental Tissue Engineering.” Articles published from March 2010 to March 2024 were considered, with inclusion criteria focusing on studies relevant to the objectives. From an initial pool of 774 articles, 86 were selected based on titles and abstracts, and 45 were shortlisted after full-text evaluation. The review highlights significant advancements in nanotechnology in endodontic materials, disinfection methods, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering. Nanomaterials have improved the efficiency, precision, and biocompatibility of dental treatments. However, challenges such as long-term biocompatibility, standardization of applications, and patient safety remain to be addressed. Continuous research, ethical practices, and regulatory oversight are crucial for integrating nanotechnology into endodontics. While nanotechnology offers promising advancements in endodontics, ongoing research and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are essential to harness its full potential and ensure patient safety. Limitations of this review include potential biases in article selection and the evolving nature of nanotechnology research.
Q3

News
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Evaluating the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: An in vitro pilot study
Mortazavi S., Hasanpour S., Anbiaee N., Rouhani A., Naghavi N., Babazadeh S., Shiezadeh I.
Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs).
Materials and Methods:
In this study, 20 single-canal premolar teeth without cracks and internal resorption were selected and after root canal treatment, divided into two: experimental and control groups. In each of the teeth in the experimental group, an artificial fracture was created with the SANTAM device, then the teeth of both groups were randomly placed in the dental sockets of a dry mandible, and after preparing CBCT images of the teeth, the images were processed by reverse contrast software. Initial and reverse contrast images were examined by two radiologists and two endodontists. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22.
Results:
Observers reported higher sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value in normal contrast images than in reverse contrast images, but the specificity reported by endodontists in reverse contrast images was slightly higher than in normal contrast images. In comparing the results of radiologists and endodontists, there was a significant agreement in the review of the initial images (κ =0/59), but there was no significant agreement in the images with reverse contrast (κ = −0/1). There was not any notable distinction observed in the assessment of normal and reverse contrast images among the observers, nor in the comparison between radiologists and endodontists, except for the examination of normal contrast images by the two groups of radiologists and endodontists (P = 0.00). From this, it can be inferred that the diagnostic power of reverse contrast images in identifying VRFs is inferior to that of normal contrast images (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
According to the obtained results, it was concluded that reverse contrast CBCT images are not effective in diagnosing VRFs and cause error in diagnosis.
Q3

Antibacterial activity and smear layer removal efficiency of silver nanoparticles as a final irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis using confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy
Chandran N., Ramesh S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered significant attention for their potent antibacterial properties, making them promising candidates for use as root canal irrigants in endodontics. The persistent presence of Enterococcus faecalis in treated root canals often leads to endodontic failures. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neem-synthesized AgNPs, chemically synthesized AgNPs, sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and saline solution in reducing viable bacteria and removing smear layers in E. faecalis-infected mandibular premolar teeth.
Materials and Methods:
After decoronation, mandibular premolar, single-rooted, teeth (120) were instrumented until ProTaper Gold F3. In all samples, inoculation of E. faecalis was done and divided into four groups depending on the irrigating solution used into Group A: neem-synthesized AgNPs, Group B: chemically synthesized AgNPs, Group C: sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and Group D: saline solution. After irrigation, roots were divided longitudinally and analyzed for confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Results:
The minimum reduction in live bacteria percentage was seen in Group C rather than Groups A and B; although there was no significant difference between them. Group D showed the maximum percentage of live bacteria and a greatest score of smear layer compared to other groups. In contrast to Group B, Group A scored higher, although the results were nonsignificant. Group C showed the least score of smear layer presence. The P value between the experimental groups was found to be <0.05, indicating statistical significance.
Conclusion:
Both neem-synthesized AgNp and sodium hypochlorite irrigants reduced the proportion of viable bacteria most significantly. This work demonstrates the possibility of employing nanoparticles as an irrigant that can effectively remove smear layers while also acting as an antimicrobial.
Q3

Endodontic management of mandibular permanent canine with two roots and two root canals using cone-beam computed tomography
Alfahadi H.R., Alyami Y.A., Alkazman F.H., Al Fadhil M.H., Alyami S.A., Alyami A.M., Alsalem M.F.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the root canal systems of various human teeth can facilitate successful root canal treatment. The mandibular canines typically have one root and one canal. Mandibular canines with two roots are uncommon. This case report describes the examination of occlusion erosion and deep caries that had reached the pulp chamber in the mandibular canine of a 56-year-old healthy Saudi female patient referred to the endodontic clinic for evaluating the left mandibular canine. Radiographic evaluation revealed a widening of the periodontal ligament and periapical radiolucency and the presence of two roots. Two roots with two root canals were observed on cone-beam computed tomography. The tooth responded to a sensitivity test and was tender upon percussion and palpation. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosis were established, and nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed using a dental operating microscope. At follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had completely disappeared.
Q3

Use of bioactive glass in combination with or without calcium hydroxide changes the biological and mechanical properties of dentin: An in vitro study
Salkoska Yildizbas A., Uysal B.A., Kucuk Keles O., Belli S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is the most commonly used medicament in endodontics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bioactive glass (BG) use with or without Ca(OH)2 on the biological and mechanical properties of dentin.
Materials and Methods:
Standard holes were created to simulate root canals on 84 dentin slices. Four groups were formed according to the medicament placed in the root canals: Ca(OH)2; Ca(OH)2 + 7% BG; BG and control. Scanning electron microscopy analysis to evaluate the dentin surfaces exposed to the test medicaments and energy dispersive X-ray analysis to observe apatite formation were used on the 1st, 7th, and 14th days. X-ray diffraction measurements were performed to investigate mineral phase formation. Microhardness and pH measurements were also carried out. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
The Ca(OH)2 and control groups showed the highest Ca and P mineral content on the 14th day, whereas the lowest Ca and P content was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). A gradual decrease in crystal formation was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group from the 1st day to the 14th day. The highest microhardness measurements were also recorded in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). The Ca(OH)2 + BG group showed the highest pH measurements (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Ca(OH)2 + BG can be an alternative intracanal medicament. Further studies should be performed to determine the clinical implications of this combination.
Q3

Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal and dentin wettability using 1% phytic acid with and without 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles: An in vitro study
Halkai R., Halkai K.R., Mahveen S.U.
Abstract
Introduction:
The success of endodontic treatment depends on the complete removal of the smear layer from the root canal and the enhanced wettability of the irrigants employed during treatment. However, none of the irrigants efficiently accomplish this; thus, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the elimination of the smear layer and wettability of root dentin using the combination of 0.2% Chitosan nanoparticles(CSN) with 1% phytic acid (PA).
Materials and Methods:
About 100 extracted single-rooted human premolar teeth were decoronated and standardized to 13 mm root length. Fifty specimens were tested for smear layer removal and another half for wettability (n = 50) after final irrigation in five groups: Group 1 – normal saline (control), Group 2 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group 3 – 17% EDTA with 0.2% CSN, Group 4 – 1% PA, and Group 5 – 1% PA with 0.2% CSN. After root canal instrumentation and final irrigation, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope for the smear layer. Wettability was determined using dentin blocks obtained (n = 50) by resecting the apical third of each specimen, treated with irrigants in aforementioned groups, and the contact angle was measured using a goniometer. Statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
A combination of 1% PA with 0.2% CSN showed higher smear layer removal and increased wettability.
Conclusions:
The incorporation of 0.2% CSN to 1% PA was effective in removing the smear layer and increased the dentinal wettability.
Q3

A cross-sectional study on awareness regarding management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns
Ikhile F.O., Enabulele J.E.
Abstract
Introduction:
Dental trauma could lead to separation or crushing of the dental supporting tissues and esthetic and functional disorders. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns in Benin City, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire containing 15 closed and open-ended questions to garner data focused on sociodemograhic characteristics and awareness of the management of traumatic dental injury, from respondents. Data from 95 respondents were statistically analyzed and both univariate and bivariate analyses were used in this study.
Results:
A significant proportion; 77 (81.1%) had a poor overall knowledge of management, although most respondents had knowledge of some of the steps involved in emergency management of dental trauma. The association between respondents’ level of education and their knowledge of the management of dental trauma was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Respondents at higher level in their dental training were found to have better overall knowledge compared to those at lower levels.
Conclusion:
The knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among the respondents was poor. This was associated with the level of study and clinical exposure.
Q3
Navigating endodontic outcomes through cone-beam computed tomography: A narrative review
Zahran S.S., Mirdad L.H.
Abstract
Periapical radiographs (PRs) have been the most reliable modality for assessing periapical health. Later, the evolution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revolutionized three-dimensional maxillofacial skeletal imaging. CBCT imaging has emerged as a superior diagnostic tool compared to PR. The aim of this narrative review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes related to the use of CBCT in evaluating various endodontic treatments, including primary root canal treatments, secondary treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies and the associated prognostic factors. The research selection process involved systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for literature on CBCT and endodontics. Criteria included English-language; peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, reporting 1-year outcomes of various endodontic treatments using CBCT. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 18 outcome study articles utilizing CBCT to evaluate primary root canal treatment were selected, as well as 7 for secondary root canal retreatment, 3 for vital pulp therapy, and 11 articles pertaining to endodontic microsurgery. The outcomes revealed varying success rates and prognostic factors. Consistent with outcome research employing PRs, studies that utilized CBCT also exhibited substantial variability in factors affecting initial and secondary treatment outcomes. The rate of favorable outcomes was significantly lower when assessed with CBCT compared to PR. The results from utilizing CBCT for primary and secondary root canal treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies demonstrate diverse success rates and prognostic factors in comparison to outcomes based solely on PRs.
Top-100
Citing journals
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
|
Physical Review E
17840 citations, 5.75%
|
|
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
15547 citations, 5.01%
|
|
Chaos
8505 citations, 2.74%
|
|
Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
6405 citations, 2.06%
|
|
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
4516 citations, 1.46%
|
|
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering
3789 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Nonlinear Dynamics
3732 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Physical Review A
3675 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Nonlinearity
3577 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
3438 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
3147 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
2806 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
2661 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2588 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Journal of Physics A General Physics
2525 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Physics
2270 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
2151 citations, 0.69%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems
2007 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Differential Equations
1778 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
1763 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Europhysics Letters
1738 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Physical Review B
1692 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Computational Physics
1454 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Physica Scripta
1279 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Computation
1215 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
1205 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Entropy
1154 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1137 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
1103 citations, 0.36%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
1102 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Physics of Plasmas
1101 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1095 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Physics Reports
1078 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Nonlinear Science
1072 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Statistical Physics
973 citations, 0.31%
|
|
European Physical Journal: Special Topics
965 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Neurocomputing
841 citations, 0.27%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis
811 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Studies in Applied Mathematics
787 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Physical Review Fluids
776 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Communications in Mathematical Physics
745 citations, 0.24%
|
|
New Journal of Physics
744 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
715 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Physical Journal B
707 citations, 0.23%
|
|
PLoS ONE
704 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications
669 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
667 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
641 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Chinese Physics B
632 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Sound and Vibration
627 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research
616 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IEEE Access
601 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
598 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Reviews of Modern Physics
576 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Communications in Theoretical Physics
554 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Теоретическая и математическая физика
539 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics(Russian Federation)
535 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications
530 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Theoretical Biology
530 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
524 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Inverse Problems
516 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
506 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Mathematics
487 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
483 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Neural Networks
470 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
466 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Applied Mathematics Letters
461 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Physical Review D
454 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Acta Materialia
452 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Physical Journal Plus
449 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computers and Mathematics with Applications
447 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series B
441 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
441 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Wave Motion
433 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
431 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
430 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations
424 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
420 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Geophysical Research Letters
415 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Optics Communications
407 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing
398 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Chinese Physics Letters
397 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
396 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics
390 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Self-Organization in Optical Systems and Applications in Information Technology
387 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BioSystems
375 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Monthly Weather Review
365 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
361 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems
357 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Complexity
354 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik
351 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
348 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Modern Physics C
344 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
343 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Physical Review Research
339 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Regular and Chaotic Dynamics
330 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
326 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Scientific Computing
326 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Modern Physics B
325 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
322 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
|
|
Elsevier
78695 citations, 25.36%
|
|
Springer Nature
45522 citations, 14.67%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
29137 citations, 9.39%
|
|
IOP Publishing
20809 citations, 6.71%
|
|
AIP Publishing
18314 citations, 5.9%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
17405 citations, 5.61%
|
|
Wiley
9126 citations, 2.94%
|
|
World Scientific
7529 citations, 2.43%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
6013 citations, 1.94%
|
|
MDPI
5759 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5446 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
4152 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2973 citations, 0.96%
|
|
The Royal Society
2804 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2619 citations, 0.84%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2456 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2146 citations, 0.69%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
1491 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1391 citations, 0.45%
|
|
SAGE
1323 citations, 0.43%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1301 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1264 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
1240 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Copernicus
908 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Steklov Mathematical Institute
893 citations, 0.29%
|
|
ASME International
892 citations, 0.29%
|
|
EDP Sciences
875 citations, 0.28%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
835 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
815 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
776 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
692 citations, 0.22%
|
|
MIT Press
674 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
625 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
623 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
606 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
498 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
496 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
441 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Reviews
438 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
423 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
362 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
332 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
322 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
287 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
272 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
260 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
251 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Physiological Society
240 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
217 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Emerald
212 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
209 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Science in China Press
194 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
183 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
161 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
141 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
136 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
132 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
111 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
103 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
98 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
84 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
75 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
74 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
74 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
72 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
69 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Biophysical Society
68 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Meteorological Society of Japan
65 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
60 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexandria University
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
59 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Stichting SciPost
58 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
55 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
52 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Wilmington Scientific Publishers
50 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
49 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
45 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
45 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Rocky Mountain Mathematics Consortium
44 citations, 0.01%
|
|
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IMR Press
36 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
36 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Societa Italiana di Fisica
32 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
32 citations, 0.01%
|
|
30 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
30 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mathematical Society of the Republic of China
28 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oxford University Press (OUP)
27 citations, 0.01%
|
|
26 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SciELO
26 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SAE International
25 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
283 publications, 2.76%
|
|
University of Arizona
149 publications, 1.45%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
118 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
118 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Warwick
106 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Kyoto University
96 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Tokyo
96 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
95 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
83 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
83 publications, 0.81%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
82 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Michigan
82 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
81 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
78 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
78 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Imperial College London
73 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Cornell University
73 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
71 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Princeton University
70 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
67 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Northwestern University
67 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Boston University
66 publications, 0.64%
|
|
New York University
66 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
64 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems
61 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
60 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences
59 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
59 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Duke University
59 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
58 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Leeds
57 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
56 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Oxford
55 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
54 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
52 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Cambridge
52 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Loughborough University
52 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Sorbonne University
51 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Chicago
51 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bristol
49 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Minnesota
48 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Surrey
48 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
46 publications, 0.45%
|
|
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
46 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
45 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Utah
45 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
44 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
44 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Utrecht University
44 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Nottingham
42 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Ohio State University
42 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Brown University
42 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
42 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
42 publications, 0.41%
|
|
A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
41 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Hokkaido University
41 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Potsdam
41 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
41 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
40 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
40 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
40 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Seville
39 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Kyushu University
39 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Catalonia
39 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Sydney
38 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
38 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Clarkson University
37 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Barcelona
37 publications, 0.36%
|
|
ETH Zurich
35 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Exeter
35 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Arizona State University
34 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Virginia Tech
34 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Paris Cité University
34 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of British Columbia
34 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Toronto
34 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Washington
33 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
33 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Houston
33 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
32 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
31 publications, 0.3%
|
|
New Jersey Institute of Technology
31 publications, 0.3%
|
|
McMaster University
31 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
29 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
29 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
29 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Lisbon
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University College London
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Southern California
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Harvard University
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Crete
28 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Western Australia
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Columbia University
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
McGill University
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
United States Naval Research Laboratory
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Bath
27 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
26 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
23 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Imperial College London
19 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
17 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Sydney
16 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
14 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Bristol
14 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
13 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Michigan
13 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
12 publications, 0.87%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Tsinghua University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Shenzhen University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Surrey
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
South China University of Technology
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
East China Normal University
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Washington
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Arizona
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Illinois Institute of Technology
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kyoto University
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Seville
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Fudan University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Oxford
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
New York University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Hokkaido University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Exeter
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Bath
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Shanghai University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sorbonne University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
McMaster University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Sichuan University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Southeast University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Warwick
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Nottingham
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Auckland
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Vienna
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Universidade Estadual Paulista
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Victoria
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Gulf University for Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Lisbon
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
North China Electric Power University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University College London
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Cambridge
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northwest University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Arizona State University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Oregon State University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Academy of Athens
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Utrecht University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Potsdam
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Porto
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Alan Turing Institute
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Texas A&M University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Southwest State University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Jiangsu Normal University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Chongqing University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Padua
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Florida State University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Loughborough University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Florence
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Pisa
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 3290, 32.06%
USA
3290 publications, 32.06%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 912, 8.89%
United Kingdom
912 publications, 8.89%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 751, 7.32%
Germany
751 publications, 7.32%
|
France
|
France, 726, 7.07%
France
726 publications, 7.07%
|
China
|
China, 573, 5.58%
China
573 publications, 5.58%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 560, 5.46%
Russia
560 publications, 5.46%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 544, 5.3%
Japan
544 publications, 5.3%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 416, 4.05%
Italy
416 publications, 4.05%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 397, 3.87%
Spain
397 publications, 3.87%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 310, 3.02%
Canada
310 publications, 3.02%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 284, 2.77%
Israel
284 publications, 2.77%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 204, 1.99%
Australia
204 publications, 1.99%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 182, 1.77%
Brazil
182 publications, 1.77%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 170, 1.66%
Netherlands
170 publications, 1.66%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 168, 1.64%
USSR
168 publications, 1.64%
|
India
|
India, 113, 1.1%
India
113 publications, 1.1%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 106, 1.03%
Belgium
106 publications, 1.03%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 105, 1.02%
Mexico
105 publications, 1.02%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 103, 1%
Switzerland
103 publications, 1%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 88, 0.86%
Denmark
88 publications, 0.86%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 84, 0.82%
Greece
84 publications, 0.82%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 84, 0.82%
Poland
84 publications, 0.82%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 65, 0.63%
Ukraine
65 publications, 0.63%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 60, 0.58%
Portugal
60 publications, 0.58%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 55, 0.54%
Norway
55 publications, 0.54%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 53, 0.52%
Sweden
53 publications, 0.52%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 48, 0.47%
Austria
48 publications, 0.47%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 47, 0.46%
Argentina
47 publications, 0.46%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 37, 0.36%
New Zealand
37 publications, 0.36%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 36, 0.35%
Czech Republic
36 publications, 0.35%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 34, 0.33%
Chile
34 publications, 0.33%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 33, 0.32%
Republic of Korea
33 publications, 0.32%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 33, 0.32%
Turkey
33 publications, 0.32%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 32, 0.31%
Ireland
32 publications, 0.31%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 31, 0.3%
Singapore
31 publications, 0.3%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 28, 0.27%
Finland
28 publications, 0.27%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 22, 0.21%
Hungary
22 publications, 0.21%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 21, 0.2%
South Africa
21 publications, 0.2%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 18, 0.18%
Romania
18 publications, 0.18%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 14, 0.14%
Iran
14 publications, 0.14%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 13, 0.13%
Saudi Arabia
13 publications, 0.13%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 13, 0.13%
Uzbekistan
13 publications, 0.13%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 11, 0.11%
Serbia
11 publications, 0.11%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 10, 0.1%
Philippines
10 publications, 0.1%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 9, 0.09%
Cameroon
9 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 9, 0.09%
Slovenia
9 publications, 0.09%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 9, 0.09%
Czechoslovakia
9 publications, 0.09%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 8, 0.08%
Bulgaria
8 publications, 0.08%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.06%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 6, 0.06%
Colombia
6 publications, 0.06%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 6, 0.06%
Kuwait
6 publications, 0.06%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.06%
UAE
6 publications, 0.06%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 6, 0.06%
Montenegro
6 publications, 0.06%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 5, 0.05%
Kazakhstan
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.05%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 5, 0.05%
Armenia
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 5, 0.05%
Venezuela
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 0.05%
Vietnam
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 5, 0.05%
Qatar
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 5, 0.05%
Cuba
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 5, 0.05%
Lithuania
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 0.05%
Thailand
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 5, 0.05%
Uruguay
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 4, 0.04%
Belarus
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 4, 0.04%
Georgia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.04%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.04%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.04%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 3, 0.03%
Algeria
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.03%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.03%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 3, 0.03%
Yugoslavia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2, 0.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.02%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.02%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.02%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 2, 0.02%
North Korea
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.02%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.02%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.02%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.01%
Benin
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.01%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.01%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.01%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.01%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.01%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.01%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.01%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.01%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.01%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.01%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (61 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 273, 19.68%
USA
273 publications, 19.68%
|
China
|
China, 246, 17.74%
China
246 publications, 17.74%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 122, 8.8%
United Kingdom
122 publications, 8.8%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 68, 4.9%
Spain
68 publications, 4.9%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 52, 3.75%
Germany
52 publications, 3.75%
|
France
|
France, 51, 3.68%
France
51 publications, 3.68%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 51, 3.68%
Japan
51 publications, 3.68%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 48, 3.46%
Russia
48 publications, 3.46%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 44, 3.17%
Italy
44 publications, 3.17%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 42, 3.03%
Australia
42 publications, 3.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 42, 3.03%
Brazil
42 publications, 3.03%
|
India
|
India, 35, 2.52%
India
35 publications, 2.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 33, 2.38%
Canada
33 publications, 2.38%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 19, 1.37%
Israel
19 publications, 1.37%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 19, 1.37%
Poland
19 publications, 1.37%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 16, 1.15%
Mexico
16 publications, 1.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 15, 1.08%
Netherlands
15 publications, 1.08%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 12, 0.87%
Portugal
12 publications, 0.87%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 11, 0.79%
Greece
11 publications, 0.79%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 10, 0.72%
New Zealand
10 publications, 0.72%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 10, 0.72%
Chile
10 publications, 0.72%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 10, 0.72%
Sweden
10 publications, 0.72%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 9, 0.65%
Belgium
9 publications, 0.65%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 0.65%
Turkey
9 publications, 0.65%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 0.58%
Austria
8 publications, 0.58%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 0.58%
Iran
8 publications, 0.58%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 0.58%
Norway
8 publications, 0.58%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 8, 0.58%
Singapore
8 publications, 0.58%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.5%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.5%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.5%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.5%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 0.5%
South Africa
7 publications, 0.5%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 6, 0.43%
Ukraine
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 6, 0.43%
Argentina
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 6, 0.43%
Czech Republic
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.43%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.43%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 5, 0.36%
Kuwait
5 publications, 0.36%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 5, 0.36%
Romania
5 publications, 0.36%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.29%
UAE
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 3, 0.22%
Kazakhstan
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.22%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 0.22%
Ecuador
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.14%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.14%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.14%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.14%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.14%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.14%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.14%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 2, 0.14%
North Korea
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.14%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.14%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.07%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.07%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.07%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.07%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.07%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.07%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.07%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.07%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.07%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.07%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.07%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.07%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.07%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.07%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.07%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.07%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.07%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.07%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.07%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.07%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.07%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.07%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (42 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
8 profile journal articles
Savin Alexander

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
163 publications,
3 132 citations
h-index: 32
2 profile journal articles
Wrzosek Dariusz
38 publications,
781 citations
h-index: 16
2 profile journal articles
Sevryuk Mihail

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
89 publications,
1 088 citations
h-index: 20
1 profile journal article
Rybalova Elena

Saratov State University
42 publications,
418 citations
h-index: 11
Research interests
Computer simulation
Data analysis
Mathematical modeling
Nonlinear dynamics
Radiophysics
Stochastic modeling
Theory of oscillations
1 profile journal article
Kułakowski Krzysztof
58 publications,
377 citations
h-index: 13
1 profile journal article
Wierschem Andreas

University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
64 publications,
1 313 citations
h-index: 21
1 profile journal article
Jauhar M
10 publications,
66 citations
h-index: 4
1 profile journal article
Zubova Elena

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
31 publications,
277 citations
h-index: 8
1 profile journal article
Kosevich Yuriy

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
114 publications,
1 961 citations
h-index: 24
1 profile journal article
Slinyko Marina

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
52 publications,
950 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Smirnov Valeriy

N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
63 publications,
462 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Francisco Manuel
107 publications,
1 364 citations
h-index: 19
1 profile journal article
A. Dimitris
61 publications,
1 241 citations
h-index: 21