Mathematics and Visualization
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
SJR
0.283
CiteScore
1.4
Categories
Applied Mathematics
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Geometry and Topology
Modeling and Simulation
Areas
Computer Science
Mathematics
Years of issue
2006, 2008-2009, 2011-2022
journal names
Mathematics and Visualization
Top-3 citing journals

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
(533 citations)

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(475 citations)

Computer Graphics Forum
(417 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Davis
(47 publications)

University of Utah
(37 publications)

University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
(33 publications)

Cardiff University
(8 publications)

Heidelberg University
(7 publications)

University College London
(7 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2022
Q2

A study on the effect of inerters in the motor elastic suspension on the stability of bogies in high-speed trains
Qi Y., Ao P., Dai H., Liu H., Wu H., Tang G.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Inerters are widely used in structural vibration systems, but there is little research on their use in the elastic-suspension of motors in high-speed train bogies. The type of the motor suspension significantly influences its vibration characteristics. To fill this gap, this paper proposes the use of the frequency-variable characteristics of the inertia spring damping (ISD) structure. The motor elastic-suspension bogie dynamic model with the inerter was established, and the effect of the motor suspension parameters on the stability of the bogie system was studied. Finally, the inertia-suspension parameters were optimized by the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-Ⅱ (NSGA-Ⅱ) multi-objective optimization algorithm. The results showed that the ISD structure has frequency-varying characteristics, and the maximum equivalent stiffness and damping exist in the low frequency range (approximately 10 Hz). As the equivalent conicity increases, the optimal lateral frequency and damping ratio of the motor increase, which makes the inerter suspension bogie to meet this characteristic. The optimized motor suspension parameters showed that the linear critical speeds of the bogie with inerter suspension are improved, and the stability of the bogie is higher within the equivalent conicity of 0.1-0.4. This study can provide a reference for the stability design of the bogie structure in future.
Q2

Effect of wheel polygonization on the dynamic response of the electromechanical coupling system in a permanent magnet direct-drive locomotive
Ye Z., Chen Z., Zhou Z., Xu Y.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The polygonization of railway vehicle wheelsets is a common type of fault that poses risks to the safety and stability of the vehicle. In permanent magnet direct drive locomotives, the rotations of the wheelsets are directly driven by the traction motor; thus, the abnormal vibration caused by the polygonal wheel can directly transmit to the traction system, resulting in strong electromechanical coupling vibrations. To investigate the effect of wheel polygonization on the dynamic response of the electromechanical coupling system in direct-drive locomotives, a locomotive-track coupled dynamic model is established in this paper. The unique structure of the direct drive traction system, the interaction of the wheel-rail system, as well as the electromechanical coupling path of the traction motor are comprehensively considered. Simulation results revealed that polygonal wheels can significantly amplify vibrations in the key components of the traction system; distinct frequencies related to polygons are observed in the electrical signals. Furthermore, the influence laws of wave depth and order of polygonal wear on the dynamic performance of the locomotive components are revealed. These research findings provide theoretical references for health monitoring and operation maintenance of wheel polygonization in permanent magnet direct drive locomotives.
Q2

A parallel method for assessing track segment quality in railway maintenance
Guo J., Liu J., Tian X., Yang J., Zhang Y., Tao K.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Track Quality Index (TQI) is a crucial indicator for assessing the condition of rail and rapid transit tracks. With the rapid increase of railway mileage and the complexity of processing large volumes of track inspection data, traditional methods that rely on a single device to process track geometry inspection data and calculate TQI no longer meet the efficiency and accuracy requirements of modern railways. This paper aims to propose a parallel method for assessing TQI track maintenance. The method is based on a multi-node data platform, using parallel computing technology to distribute different tasks in TQI calculation process such as track inspection data mileage correction, invalid data identification, and standard deviation calculation to multiple nodes. This approach enables standardized and rapid processing of large-scale track geometry inspection data. Using track geometry inspection data from various lengths of high-speed railway lines in China to test the proposed method, the results show that the new method significantly improves computational efficiency compared to traditional methods while maintaining high accuracy. The application of this method will greatly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of railway maintenance, providing robust technical support for the management and maintenance of railway infrastructure.
Q2

Effects of asymmetric terrains near tunnel entrances on aerodynamic characteristics of trains
Jiang J., Liu T., Gao H., Zhou M., Xia Y., Huo X., Wang X., Chen X., Xu B.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Asymmetric terrains near tunnel entrances may affect stability of railway vehicles while entering tunnels. Numerical simulations with three-dimensional, unsteady, and compressible flow are conducted on aerodynamic characteristics of trains traveling through a tunnel with asymmetric mountains with different slope angles near its entrance, including the non-mountain (flat ground), 45°-mountain, and 90°-mountain. The aerodynamic loads (the side force, rolling moment, and yawing moment) and surface pressure of the vehicles, as well as the flow around them are analyzed. A comparison between the surface pressures of the vehicle 2 in the numerical simulation and full-scale tests showed a 2.2% difference in peak-to-peak values during tunnel entry, validating the simulation results. The aerodynamic loads of the trailing vehicle are more sensitive to the slope angle of the mountain near the tunnel entrance, compared with the leading vehicle. The aerodynamic loads increase with the increase in the slope angle. The effect of the slope angle on the rolling moment is the most remarkable, and the rolling moment of the trailing vehicle with the 90°-mountain is 256.6% larger than that without a mountain. A trend in the flow toward the side with the flat ground and the limited space around the side with the mountain cause and increase the instability of the trailing vehicle when entering the tunnel. These findings provide valuable insights for designing and optimizing tunnel entrances and enhancing the stability of trains navigating asymmetric terrains.
Q2

Comparative analysis of rail pad lateral dynamic performance in metro systems
Bai Y., He Z., Qu S., Li B., Zhai W.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The lateral stiffness and damping of rail pads significantly influence train performance on curves, yet their effects are not well understood. This study investigates the lateral dynamics of three rail pad structures: groove (GRP), mesh-type (MTRP), and mesh-type with high damping (MTHDRP), and their impact on train curve performance. Results from lateral loading tests indicate that MTHDRP pads exhibit the highest lateral static stiffness, dynamic stiffness, and damping ratio, while GRP pads have the lowest, highlighting significant performance disparities. Finite element analysis reveals substantial deformations in GRP pads under high lateral loads, leading to increased stress levels. Strategies to increase the lateral stiffness across these pad types involve structural parameter adjustment and integration of harder materials, detailed further in the conclusions. Multibody dynamic simulations suggest that decreasing lateral stiffness while increasing damping not only increases train safety on curves but also reduces track system vibration. Under varying conditions of speed, curve radius, rail slope, and superelevation, MTHDRP consistently demonstrates favorable performance, underscoring the importance of lateral dynamics in the design, manufacturing, testing, and dynamic analysis of rail pads to optimize vehicle and track performance on curves.
Q2

A new technique for temporary adhesion improvement via dry-air jetting and its application in reducing the braking distance of railway vehicles
Yamamoto D.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

This study proposes a technique to temporarily improve the friction force by jetting dry air with less than 30% humidity on the contact surface. The tangential contact force was first measured under the condition that a very small amount of water was on the contact surface and the velocity was 30 km/h to confirm that the proposed technique is effective even in rainy weather. The findings revealed that the adhesive force increased by reducing the amount of water on the contact surface. These experimental results indicate that the dry-air jetting technique effectively increases the friction coefficient, even under rainy conditions, because dry-air jetting can remove water droplets on the surface. Subsequently, an experiment was conducted on the tangential contact force using a twin-disc sliding-frictional rolling machine to verify our proposed technique under different dry conditions. The tangential contact force coefficient increased simultaneously with dry-air jetting and remained stable during dry-air jetting under dry and high-humidity environmental conditions. Furthermore, the findings clarified that the tangential contact force improvement effect of dry-air jetting depends on the combination of the contact patch and its surface properties. Finally, based on these experimental results, we compared the same rail vehicles with and without considering the braking distance as an example of a dry-air jetting system application, using a vehicle dynamics analysis constructed using the SIMPACK commercial software. Consequently, the validity of the proposed technique was confirmed for actual rail vehicles.
Q2

Optimization design of curved rail profile for heavy-haul railways based on multi-period optimization method
Xu B., Ge X., Shi Z., Yang Y., Chen S., Wang J., Wang K.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Rail grinding is widely employed in heavy-haul railways to mitigate abnormal rail wear. However, frequent grinding can result in even more significant material loss than regular wear. This paper presents a method for adjusting track layout parameters to alleviate the severe rail wear problem on curved lines. First, field experiments and simulation analysis have been used to analyze the impact of track parameters on wheel-rail contact and the feasibility of parameter adjustment. A numerical optimization model has been established based on Genetic Algorithm-Levenberg Marquardt- Backpropagation neural networks (GA-LM-BP neural network), with the track parameters as the independent variable and the goal of reducing wear as the objective. The chaotic microvariation adaptive genetic algorithm has been used to obtain an optimized solution set. Finally, the optimization effects are revealed by comparing the rail wear characteristics obtained from the original values and the optimal solution set.
Q2

A study of the effect of grinding machine parameters on acoustic rail roughness and surface quality
Wilkes J.A., Thompson D.J.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Rail grinding is performed by infrastructure managers to control, reduce or prevent the growth of rail defects, such as rolling contact fatigue and corrugation. This is done using preventive methods (to attempt to prevent defects from forming) or corrective methods (to remove defects present in the rail). Trials were undertaken on preventive rail grinding machines used by Network Rail, with the aim of improving the finished quality of the rail whilst still achieving the metal removal and reprofiling required. An important aspect considered in the trials was the acoustic rail roughness and its relationship with grinding surface quality indices. The results demonstrated that, in the case of the operational machines used by Network Rail, the largest impact on the overall surface quality was the age and conditioning of the grinding stones. The trials also demonstrated the differences in Standard requirements for achieving good surface quality indices for grinding and good acoustic roughness levels. They further highlighted the importance of identifying rail corrugation prior to preventive grinding to reduce the likelihood of the grinding signature increasing roughness at corrugation wavelengths.
Q2

Algorithm-based strategy to define an equivalent railway track for wear simulations
Augusto de Paula Pacheco P., Valente Lopes M., Correa P.H., Bosso N., Magelli M., Zampieri N., Antunes dos Santos A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Multibody simulations of train dynamics commonly employ generic short tracks to validate and observe the behaviour of wagons in certain conditions. However, for proper wheel wear analysis, the entire railway track should be modelled, increasing computational cost and time to obtain worn profiles and wear parameters. The major novelty of this work is the description of a reproducible algorithm-based methodology to obtain a statistically representative shorter equivalent railway track for wear simulations. The proposed methodology includes combining a real measured track with multibody dynamic simulation. To verify the approach, a case study was conducted on a 505 km-long railway in Brazil. Additionally, two distinct vehicles were employed: a European wagon with a standard gauge and a Brazilian wagon with a meter gauge. The shorter equivalent tracks were compared in terms of worn area and wear depth to the initial track, and the generated tracks were cross-compared between vehicles to verify the robustness of the method. It is observed that wear simulations can be performed more efficiently and effectively, reducing the computational time by at least 94%, while still obtaining accurate results, given that the final equivalent tracks were 18.59 times shorter for the Brazilian model and 22.45 times shorter for the European model comparing to the real track, with the maximum deviation being 6.55% in flange depth and with a maximum root mean-square error (RMSE) of 871 nm.
Q2

A field methodology to assess the performance of rail cleaning, using a new portable tribometer
White B., Watson M., Jaffe J., Lewis R.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Low adhesion between wheel and rail can be caused by autumn leaf fall, reacting and adhering with the steel, resulting in signals passed at danger, station overruns or in worst cases derailments and collisions. Various methods to remove this layer or increase friction have been developed including water jetting, abrasive cleaning, traction gels and chemical treatments, new interventions are trialled each year. However, representative low friction conditions are difficult to generate repeatedly and measure, as such the efficacy of these interventions remains difficult to establish. Twenty years ago British Rail Research stated “Paradoxically it has been the lack of low adhesion that has hindered the development of low adhesion remedies”. This still remains largely true today. In this paper a method is proposed to form a representative organic layer, by placing powdered leaf material on the railhead and rolling with a vehicle until it has blackened and bonded to the underlying steel. The layers were visually inspected using industry guidelines and their friction was measured using the new Rivelin Rail PRT300 tribometer. The method was found to be capable of reliably producing contamination levels from light to heavy as required for testing by varying the quantity of leaves added. Friction coefficients for medium and heavily contaminated rails were all below 0.05, these would typically be described as ultra-low adhesion. As an illustration of the method, a trial of a new (anonymised) railhead cleaning technique is included in this work as a case study. The layer formation and measurement methodology proposed could be adopted by the wider rail industry to provide a more data-driven approach to understanding friction enhancer and railhead cleaning technology performance, through optimising current treatments and assessing the performance of novel technology.
Q2

An integrated approach for fatigue design of rail vehicle suspensions under block loading
Luo R.K., Thompson M., Xu J., Li X.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

In this case study, we introduce a new approach by applying the most recent fatigue criterion, effective tensile stress, to a rail vehicle suspension spring for the first time. Without the need for curve fitting, this criterion can effectively predict fatigue life under positive and negative R ratios. We defined a general S-N function and failure rates based on published results from cylindrical dumbbell samples on 30 fatigue cases. The measured load-displacement curve validated the material model with an elastic constant ratio. Blocks of three different loading sets were applied to a rail vehicle suspension spring for 125k cycles. One crack initiation was observed at 82k cycles and propagated to 97 mm after the test. We successfully predicted crack initiation at 81k cycles (with a failure rate of 7%) and 92k cycles (with a failure rate of 10%) using the Palmgren–Miner law. This prediction agreed with the experiment’s observation, demonstrating the approach’s reliability. The general S-N function could be used for the design and failure analysis of rail vehicle suspensions, providing reassurance in the design process.
Q2

Train-velocity-filtering of wayside noise to measure grind effectiveness when targeting variable wavelength rail corrugation
Carneiro J., Lasisi A., Regehr J., Jeffrey I., Magel E., Chénier S., Reimer M.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

We propose and apply novel corrugation and corrugation-related noise metrics designed to help maintainers monitor corrugation actively (on rail) or passively (by proxy through noise) at locations in a transit property. The novelty of our approach consists of incorporating wavelength-variable corrugation filtering, and wavelength- and velocity-dependent noise weighting into existing rail corrugation and wayside noise metrics primarily for municipal rail maintenance. The modified metrics isolate corrugation and corrugation-related noise in a manner tailored to a property’s operational characteristics, such as train velocity. The proposed modified metrics are applied to a data set collected from a pre- and post-grind monitoring regimen at 17 measurement sites in a North American property to investigate their responses. This study demonstrates the benefit of adapting the filtering methodology used to produce summary corrugation statistics to suit a specific property’s corrugation needs. It also demonstrates the need to include target corrugation wavelengths and approximate train velocity to appropriately weight the noise spectrum in a sample. These developments supplement the available methods that property maintainers can adopt to monitor corrugation conditions at discrete locations throughout a system by providing tools/metrics that are specifically designed to correctly assess the appropriate wavelength of corrugation on the rail face, thereby allowing maintainers to then accurately monitor corrugation via noise by means of passive wayside measurements.
Q2

Ultrasonic guided wave detection of point rail damage of high-speed railway turnout
Tian C., Feng X., Qian Y., Yuan Y., Xu J., Chen R., Jiang W., Hu C.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

The precise and efficient identification of damage in point rails of turnouts represents a critical and challenging technological issue that requires immediate attention. Guided wave inspection, as a non-destructive testing method, holds significant potential for practical applications in the research field focused on the identification of damage in point rails of high-speed railway turnouts. This study integrates rigorous theoretical analysis, advanced numerical simulation techniques, and meticulous experimental investigations to comprehensively investigate the excitation, propagation, and reception processes of ultrasonic-guided waves within the point rail. By strategically applying excitation signals at optimized positions specifically tailored for point rail detection, employing a frequency of 30 kHz, appropriate excitation modes are carefully selected. Defect identification within the extended point rail is performed from a dual perspective, encompassing both cross-correlation analysis and time-frequency analysis. The obtained results substantiate that when employing the cross-correlation coefficient to detect cracks in the elongated point rail, the sensitivity of crack detection is significantly higher in the rail bottom region as opposed to the rail head region. Furthermore, through the analysis of variations in the cross-correlation coefficient and the application of wavelet transformations to the guided wave signals, it is not only feasible to ascertain the presence and location of damages within the rail base region of the extended point rail but also to evaluate the relative size of the cracks. The findings of this research contribute a robust theoretical foundation for the subsequent analysis and evaluation of damage detection in high-speed turnout point rails.
Q2

Application of waste materials for concrete and composite railway sleeper production: A review
Safari F., Rezaie M., Esmaeili M., Habibnejad Korayem A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

Railways are more energy efficient than any other mode of transportation, offering an opportunity to reduce energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and air pollution. However, to reduce the high maintenance costs and activities, the application of waste materials in the railway industry has received attention; they are used as ballast, sub-ballast, and sleeper constituent elements. Sleepers have shown promising potential for recycled material usage, and concrete and composite sleepers have received more attention. Therefore, railway sleepers employ a variety of materials such as waste rubber, silica fume, slag, fibres, fly ash, coal ash, recycled concrete aggregate, and recycled plastics. Considering the vast scope of the subject, a comprehensive technical study gap in producing sleepers with waste material applications is perceived. This paper is written to collect the investigations on waste materials application on the physical, mechanical, dynamical, and durability performance of railway sleepers. In this paper, concrete and composite railway sleepers have been considered. Then, waste impacts are gathered, compared, tabulated, and the mechanisms are discussed to evaluate the study focus and scope for future research. This study shows that silica fume, slag, and fly ash improved the mechanical properties of concrete sleepers, while crumb rubber negatively affected the mentioned properties and increased the concrete damping capability. Pozzolans are noted to have a positive role in durability characteristics. Fibres improved the mechanical and durability performance of composite sleepers. Rubber has also improved the durability and flexibility of composite sleepers but decreased strength.
Q2

Smart railways: AI-based track-side monitoring for wheel flat identification
Mohammadi M., Mosleh A., Vale C., Ribeiro D., Montenegro P., Meixedo A.
Q2
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
|
Abstract

The wheel flat detection in trains using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical advancement in railway maintenance and safety practices. AI systems can effectively identify geometric deformation in wheel rotation patterns, indicative of potential wheel flat damage, resorting to wayside monitoring systems and machine learning algorithms. This study aims to propose an unsupervised learning algorithm to identify and localize railway wheel flats, which considers three stages: (i) wheel flat detection to distinguish a healthy wheel from a damaged one using outlier analysis, achieving 100 percent accuracy; (ii) localizing the damage to pinpoint the location of the defective wheel through the Hidden Markov Model (HMM); (iii) classification of wheel damage based on its severity using k-means clustering technique. The unsupervised learning algorithm is validated with artificial data attained from a virtual wayside monitoring system related to freight train passages with healthy wheels and defective wheels with single and multiple defects. The proposed methodology demonstrated efficiency and robustness for wheel flat detection, localization, and damage severity classification regardless of the number of defective wheels and their position.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
533 citations, 8.08%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
475 citations, 7.2%
|
|
Computer Graphics Forum
417 citations, 6.32%
|
|
Mathematics and Visualization
308 citations, 4.67%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Graphics
101 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Computers and Graphics
94 citations, 1.43%
|
|
Visual Computer
83 citations, 1.26%
|
|
CAD Computer Aided Design
56 citations, 0.85%
|
|
IEEE Access
48 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
45 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Computer Aided Geometric Design
44 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Visualization
44 citations, 0.67%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
43 citations, 0.65%
|
|
NeuroImage
32 citations, 0.49%
|
|
International Journal of Computer Vision
31 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Scientific Reports
31 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
30 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
29 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
23 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
22 citations, 0.33%
|
|
NMR in Biomedicine
20 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Computational Physics
19 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
18 citations, 0.27%
|
|
PLoS ONE
18 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Graphical Models
17 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
17 citations, 0.26%
|
|
BMC Bioinformatics
16 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Human Brain Mapping
15 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Discrete and Computational Geometry
15 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Computational Mathematics
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Medical Image Analysis
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Scientific Computing
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Applied and Computational Topology
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Engineering with Computers
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Bioinformatics
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Symmetry
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Neuroinformatics
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PLoS Computational Biology
9 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Nature Communications
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Signal Processing
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Computer-Aided Design and Applications
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Physics in Medicine and Biology
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Chaos
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Physics
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Pattern Recognition
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Information Visualization
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Numerical Algorithms
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Soft Matter
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Medical Physics
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Computing and Visualization in Science
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pattern Recognition Letters
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mathematics
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Computational Visual Media
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AIMS Mathematics
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Measurement Science and Technology
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Springer INdAM Series
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Advances in Pattern Recognition
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Image and Graphics
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Inverse Problems and Imaging
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Foundations of Computational Mathematics
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Association for Women in Mathematics Series
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Sensors
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Nonlinear Dynamics
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
Springer Nature
1861 citations, 28.22%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1440 citations, 21.83%
|
|
Wiley
644 citations, 9.76%
|
|
Elsevier
627 citations, 9.51%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
291 citations, 4.41%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
122 citations, 1.85%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
90 citations, 1.36%
|
|
MDPI
78 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
70 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Oxford University Press
61 citations, 0.92%
|
|
SAGE
56 citations, 0.85%
|
|
IOP Publishing
45 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
39 citations, 0.59%
|
|
AIP Publishing
35 citations, 0.53%
|
|
World Scientific
27 citations, 0.41%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
27 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
25 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
24 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Emerald
23 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
23 citations, 0.35%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
21 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
19 citations, 0.29%
|
|
ASME International
19 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
13 citations, 0.2%
|
|
EDP Sciences
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
11 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Royal Society
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
7 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOS Press
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Copernicus
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
5 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Volgograd State University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Informationsmanagement in der Biotechnologie e.V. (IMBio e.V.)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SAE International
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japan Society for Precision Engineering
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Colegio Oficial de la Psicologia de Madrid
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Open Science Center, University of Jyvaskyla
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Kyushu University
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Rheology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
The Research Council of Norway
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Geological Society of America
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
University of California, Davis
47 publications, 5.21%
|
|
University of Utah
37 publications, 4.1%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
33 publications, 3.66%
|
|
Harvard University
28 publications, 3.1%
|
|
Zuse Institute Berlin
28 publications, 3.1%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
27 publications, 2.99%
|
|
Linköping University
25 publications, 2.77%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
24 publications, 2.66%
|
|
Leipzig University
24 publications, 2.66%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
23 publications, 2.55%
|
|
University College London
23 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
22 publications, 2.44%
|
|
ETH Zurich
20 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University of Southern California
20 publications, 2.22%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
20 publications, 2.22%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
18 publications, 2%
|
|
Saarland University
18 publications, 2%
|
|
University of Bergen
17 publications, 1.88%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
17 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Sorbonne University
16 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
15 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
14 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Heidelberg University
13 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Oregon State University
13 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Cardiff University
13 publications, 1.44%
|
|
King's College London
12 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
12 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
11 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Genoa
11 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
11 publications, 1.22%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
10 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Graz University of Technology
10 publications, 1.11%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
10 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
10 publications, 1.11%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 1%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
9 publications, 1%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
9 publications, 1%
|
|
Brown University
9 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Leeds
9 publications, 1%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Verona
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Constructor University
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Purdue University
8 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Stony Brook University
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Swansea University
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Groningen
7 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
New York University
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
German Cancer Research Center
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Valladolid
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Mississippi State University
6 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Neurological Institute Foundation Casimiro Mondino
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Arizona State University
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Cologne
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Greifswald
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Sandia National Laboratories California
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
5 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Bologna
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Pavia
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Berghofer Medical Research Institute
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Chicago
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of South Florida
4 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Cardiff University
8 publications, 7.21%
|
|
Heidelberg University
7 publications, 6.31%
|
|
University College London
7 publications, 6.31%
|
|
Linköping University
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
University of Leeds
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
University of Utah
6 publications, 5.41%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
5 publications, 4.5%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
ETH Zurich
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
King's College London
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
4 publications, 3.6%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of Melbourne
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of South Florida
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Kyushu University
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of Valladolid
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Verona
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Pavia
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Neurological Institute Foundation Casimiro Mondino
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Oregon State University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Leipzig University
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Sandia National Laboratories
2 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Lausanne
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University Hospital of Basel
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Heilongjiang University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Niguarda Hospital
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Berghofer Medical Research Institute
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Keio University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Mons
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Waterloo
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University Hospital Aachen
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Purdue University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Brown University
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Groningen
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
1 publication, 0.9%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
USA
|
USA, 326, 36.14%
USA
326 publications, 36.14%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 262, 29.05%
Germany
262 publications, 29.05%
|
France
|
France, 85, 9.42%
France
85 publications, 9.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 76, 8.43%
United Kingdom
76 publications, 8.43%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 50, 5.54%
Italy
50 publications, 5.54%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 42, 4.66%
Netherlands
42 publications, 4.66%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 41, 4.55%
Austria
41 publications, 4.55%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 36, 3.99%
Switzerland
36 publications, 3.99%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 34, 3.77%
Sweden
34 publications, 3.77%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 30, 3.33%
Canada
30 publications, 3.33%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 26, 2.88%
Israel
26 publications, 2.88%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 23, 2.55%
Spain
23 publications, 2.55%
|
China
|
China, 20, 2.22%
China
20 publications, 2.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 20, 2.22%
Norway
20 publications, 2.22%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 19, 2.11%
Venezuela
19 publications, 2.11%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 16, 1.77%
Australia
16 publications, 1.77%
|
India
|
India, 12, 1.33%
India
12 publications, 1.33%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 11, 1.22%
Japan
11 publications, 1.22%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 1%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 1%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 8, 0.89%
Poland
8 publications, 0.89%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 7, 0.78%
Portugal
7 publications, 0.78%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 0.78%
Brazil
7 publications, 0.78%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 0.78%
Denmark
7 publications, 0.78%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.78%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.78%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.67%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.67%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 5, 0.55%
Serbia
5 publications, 0.55%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.44%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.44%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.44%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.44%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.33%
Greece
3 publications, 0.33%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.33%
Iran
3 publications, 0.33%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.33%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.33%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.33%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.33%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.22%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.22%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.22%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.22%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.11%
Russia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.11%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.11%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.11%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.11%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.11%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.11%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.11%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.11%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.11%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.11%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.11%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.11%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.11%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.11%
Finland
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.11%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.11%
Chile
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Show all (22 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
USA
|
USA, 46, 41.44%
USA
46 publications, 41.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 26, 23.42%
Germany
26 publications, 23.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 20, 18.02%
United Kingdom
20 publications, 18.02%
|
France
|
France, 10, 9.01%
France
10 publications, 9.01%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 8.11%
Switzerland
9 publications, 8.11%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 9, 8.11%
Sweden
9 publications, 8.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 7, 6.31%
Canada
7 publications, 6.31%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 5.41%
Spain
6 publications, 5.41%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 5.41%
Japan
6 publications, 5.41%
|
China
|
China, 5, 4.5%
China
5 publications, 4.5%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 5, 4.5%
Australia
5 publications, 4.5%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 4.5%
Italy
5 publications, 4.5%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 3.6%
Denmark
4 publications, 3.6%
|
India
|
India, 4, 3.6%
India
4 publications, 3.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 3.6%
Netherlands
4 publications, 3.6%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 2.7%
Poland
3 publications, 2.7%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 1.8%
Belgium
2 publications, 1.8%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.9%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.9%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.9%
Israel
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.9%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.9%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.9%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.9%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.9%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.9%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.9%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|