Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
6.5
SJR
1.630
CiteScore
10.5
Categories
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Urban Studies
Areas
Environmental Science
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1970, 1976-2025
journal names
Habitat International
HABITAT INT
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(152 publications)

University of Hong Kong
(111 publications)

Zhejiang University
(73 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 5199
Q1

Treetop: topology optimization using constructive solid geometry trees
Kumar Padhy R., Thombre P., Suresh K., Chandrasekhar A.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Integrating moving morphable components and plastic layout optimization: a two-stage approach for enhanced structural topology optimization
Lotfalian A., Esmaeilpour P., Yoon G.H., Takalloozadeh M.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Simultaneous node-based shape and thickness optimization of thin-walled structures using the explicit Vertex Morphing method
Schmölz D., Devresse B., Geiser A., Bletzinger K.
Abstract
Node-based shape optimization has been successfully and consistently formulated via shape and sensitivity filtering methods. This work studies the union of the Vertex Morphing method, a shape parameterization technique that uses an explicit shape filtering approach, and shell thickness optimization. On this occasion, thickness variables are explicitly filtered similarly to the shape, but their filter is computed on the initial geometry configuration throughout the optimization. The problem is formulated such that both design variable types are optimized concurrently. Gradient-based algorithms are employed to solve the optimization problem, which have proven well suited for the Vertex Morphing method. Due to the different dimensionalities of the shape and thickness variables, a design variable scaling method between the two types is proposed, improving the convergence behavior without the necessity of second-order information. Academic examples and the application of a structure with industrial significance illustrate the method’s success.
Q1

Connectivity-driven topology optimization for path-following compliant mechanism: a formulation with predictive volume constraints and adaptive strategies for gray element suppression
Zhang L., Koppen S., van Keulen F.
Abstract
We propose a topology optimization (TO) formulation and related optimization scheme for designing compliant mechanisms following a user-defined trajectory. To ensure the broad applicability and achieve precisely control of the outputs, geometric nonlinearity with incremental solutions are considered. A challenge in the design optimization of these structures is the development of formulations with satisfactory balance between (i) precise trajectory control and (ii) proper connectivity between the input/output ports and the support. Previously proposed density-based topology optimization formulations typically lack the promotion of the desired load-transferring connections, or usually complicate the design using mixed shape, size, and topology variables to enforce a minimum connectivity. To simplify design progress using exclusive topology variables, i.e., purely density-based TO methods, we propose a relatively straightforward formulation involving commonly used response functions, such as compliance and volume as constraints. For the constraints, the paper provides a scheme for defining corresponding upper limits. Numerical examples of challenging shell and plate design optimization problems demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation and scheme in the generation of load-transferring connections while limiting the impact on the performance of the path generation functionality.
Q1

Multiscale structural concurrent fail-safe topology optimization
Ding W., Jia H., Xu P., Zhang Y., Cheng F.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Minimum size control for binary topology optimization
Cortez R.L., Setta M., Picelli R., Wadbro E.
Abstract
Topology optimization methods employing binary (also known as discrete) design variables currently lack mathematical formulations to ensure length scale control in their solutions. This paper proposes and applies a morphology-mimicking filtering scheme to provide a minimum size control (often also referred to as minimum length scale control) in this class of binary designs. The Topology Optimization of Binary Structures (TOBS) method was chosen as the foundational framework for this length scale control study. Thermal and structural compliance scenarios were explored under this approach. Numerical results show that the proposed filter efficiently imposes the desired minimum length scale. The optimized designs were also less dependent on the filtering parameters when compared to designs optimized using standard techniques that employ continuous design variables.
Q1

Automatic projection parameter increase for three-field density-based topology optimization
Dunning P., Wein F.
Abstract
A method is proposed to automatically increase the threshold projection parameter in three-field density-based topology optimization to achieve near binary designs. The three-field method is composed of an element-wise design density field that is filtered and then passed through a smooth threshold projection function to compute the projected density field, which is then used to compute element properties, e.g., using a power law for stiffness. The sharpness of the threshold projection function is controlled by a parameter
$$\beta $$
β
. In this paper, a method is introduced to automatically increase this parameter during optimization by linking it to the change in objective function. Furthermore, the gray value indicator is added as a stopping criterion to guarantee the solution is near binary. This results in a method that does not need to be tuned for specific problems, or optimizers, and the same set of user-defined parameters can be used for a wide range of problems. However, a high value of the threshold projection parameter may cause convergence issues for some optimizers, such as the optimally criteria method, and an adaptive move limit strategy is introduced to overcome this problem. It is also shown that some problems require length-scale control to achieve a near binary design. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on several benchmark problems, including linear compliance, linear buckling, compliant mechanism, heat conduction, and geometrically nonlinear problems.
Q1

A sequential linear programming approach for truss optimization based on the uncertainty analysis-based data-driven computational mechanics (UA-DDCM)
Huang M., Du Z., Liu C., Zhang W., Guo X.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Topology optimization for pressurized nonlinear structures using substructure and experimental studies
Lu Y., Luo Q., Tong L.
Abstract
A compliant structure under fluidic pressure can undergo relatively large shape change, but the design of such type of structure is challenging as the pressure distribution depends on detailed structural geometry. In this study, a novel mixed substructure-density (MSD) model is proposed for topology representation and update in the optimal design of nonlinear compliant structures under quasi-static fluidic pressure. An optimization algorithm is developed via implementing the present model by using super-elements in commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software. Numerical examples are presented to validate the present model, algorithm, and designs numerically via full linear and nonlinear FEAs. A planar cellular network with five cells arranged in parallel is then designed for representing a pressurized wing rib structure capable of modulating airfoil thickness variation. The test results of the single-cell and five-cell PCS specimens prototyped using polyurethane material show that the respective cell thickness can be reduced by 11.9 and 6.4% respectively under a cell pressure of 250 kPa.
Q1

Constructability-based multi-objective optimization with machine learning-enhanced meta-heuristics for reinforcing bar design in rectangular concrete columns
Verduzco L.F.
Abstract
Optimization of reinforcing bar (rebar) design represents a preponderant factor in reducing material usage and wastes for reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The assessment of constructability of such rebar designs is crucial to improve their practicality and reduce construction costs, which makes the problem multi-objective (MO). However, when applying optimization methods for the design of rebar in RC structures, little attention has been paid on columns, in comparison to beams and slabs. Meta-heuristic algorithms (MA) have been the ones mostly deployed for these types of elements, which have proven to be of high computational cost. Additionally, an existing gap in the literature as to how to relate the design and construction stage of rebar in RC structures through constructability analysis is evident. In this regard, research has been focused mainly at the building level but not at the element level. This works presents a novel algorithmic framework using Machine Learning (ML)-enhanced meta-heuristics for the optimal design of rebar on rectangular RC columns. To assess the constructability of the resulting rebar layouts a Buildability Score (BS) model at the element level is proposed. The complexity analysis of rebar design under the constructability restrictions, through combinatorial optimization (CO), is used to assess the global time efficiency of the framework. The Non-Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was deployed for showcase and five different ML algorithms were used to enhance it, namely the k-NN classifier, SVM regression, ANN, Gauss Process (GP) regression, and Tree Ensembles (TE), where the latter three showed the best performance.
Q1

Density-based hole seeding in XFEM level-set topology optimization of fluid problems
Høghøj L.C., Andreasen C.S., Maute K.
Abstract
The optimization results of level-set methods typically suffer from a strong dependence on the initial design. To mitigate this dependence, this work presents a density-based hole nucleation method for level-set topology optimization of flow problems. This is achieved by defining both the level-set and density values as functions of the design variables. To preserve the crispness of the geometry definition afforded by the level-set method, the fluid flow is modeled using the Heaviside enriched eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for the laminar incompressible Navier–Stokes equation, which is augmented by a Brinkman model. The boundary conditions are enforced weakly using Nitsche’s method. A face-oriented ghost stabilization scheme is applied to stabilize the XFEM formulation. Additional terms ensuring stability are added to Nitsche’s method and the ghost stabilization to account for the Brinkman term in the Navier–Stokes equation. The necessity of adding these terms is highlighted by numerical studies. Two- and three-dimensional fluid manifolds are optimized to minimize fluid power dissipation while achieving a predefined mass flow distribution among the outlets. The optimization results show that the proposed method bypasses the need for an initial hole seeding and speeds up the convergence of the optimization process.
Q1

Topology optimization of beams’ cross-sectional properties considering torsional and warping behavior
Kostopoulos C., Marzok A., Waisman H.
This paper introduces a novel efficient topology optimization methodology for beams’ torsion using the warping function formulation. The finite element method is used to discretize the cross-section and an efficient gradient-based optimization problem is formulated to optimize the relevant parameters corresponding to the torsion and warping constants of the beam. As a result, for the first time, one can optimize a beam for problems where the warping behavior is dominant. Density-based optimization is defined where the SIMP approach is utilized to penalize intermediate element densities. A key challenge of the optimization that arises in the warping function framework is the design-dependent nature of the problem. That is, the forcing vector varies during the optimization as it depends on the cross-section boundaries, which are functions of the updating topology. To this end, a differentiable boundary recognition algorithm is proposed. The methodology is applied to design beam cross-sections in which both torsion and warping constants are of interest. While intuitive topologies are obtained in the case of optimized torsion constant, this is not the case for the warping constant. The latter shows unique material distributions and a special dependence on the allowable material density.
Q1

Uncertainty-based multi-disciplinary multi-objective design optimization of unmanned mining electric shovel
Hu Z., Long X., Lian K., Lin S., Song X.
Electric shovel (ES) is a large mining equipment crucial for energy security. The traditional design of the structure and control system of ES is carried out in stages, and the influence of the structural uncertainty for the system is not considered, which makes it difficult to obtain the optimal parameters of the system. Facing the demand of intelligent development, ES designed using traditional deterministic methods is difficult to meet the working demand of unmanned mining electric shovel (UMES). To address these challenges, this paper proposes an uncertainty-based multidisciplinary multi-objective optimization (UMMO) framework for UMES. Within this framework, the mechanical structure of the front-end mechanism was analyzed, excavation trajectories were planned based on a polynomial point-to-point motion strategy, and models for the excavation resistance of the dipper and the dynamical model of the front-end working device were constructed. Then, optimization objective functions were constructed with excavation energy consumption, excavation efficiency, and full dipper rate as targets. By analyzing the working characteristics of UMES, essential constraints were introduced for the mechanical system, control system and hardware. The UMMO optimization model was established to enhance the reliability of the UMES production process. Finally, the mechanical structure dimensions and control system parameters are optimized to generate the optimal physical structure and excavation trajectory considering uncertainties. The numerical results show that compared with the deterministic optimization results, the optimized structure of the proposed UMMO strategy is more compact and the mechanical structure is more reliable in the production process.
Q1

A collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems
Ye K., Wang H., Ma X.
Complex engineering systems that involve multiple disciplines or scales are often decomposed into multiple subsystems in a nested or hierarchical manner to enhance the analysis efficiency. However, uncertainties inherent in input parameters will propagate with hierarchy, and severely threaten the reliability of engineering systems. Adaptive surrogate modeling technique is a potent tool to alleviate the computational burden of reliability analysis, especially involving time-consuming computer experiments. Conventional black-box adaptive surrogate modeling framework did not incorporate nested characteristic, which is inefficient for the reliability analysis of complex systems with nested or hierarchical characteristics. This paper develops a collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems. First, we propose a nested U-function to propel the adaptive updating of underlying Kriging models and derive its approximate closed form based on a defined most probable misclassification point. Then, an accuracy enhancement stage is devised to compensate for the inaccuracies of first-order approximation in early iterations. A parallel radius-based importance sampling technique is presented to mitigate the computational effort at multiple candidates. Finally, an index considering the reduction of model uncertainty is exploited to quantify the contribution of individual Kriging model and select the to-be-refined Kriging model in one iteration. Through numerical examples and case studies, the superiority of the proposed methodology is comprehensively illustrated compared with other benchmark methods.
Q1

Discrete variable topology optimization using multi-cut formulation and adaptive trust regions
Ye Z., Pan W.
We present a new framework for efficiently solving general topology optimization (TO) problems that find an optimal material distribution within a design space to maximize the performance of a part or structure while satisfying design constraints. These problems can involve convex or non-convex objective functions and may include multiple candidate materials. The framework is designed to greatly enhance computational efficiency, primarily by diminishing optimization iteration counts and thereby reducing the frequency of solving associated state equilibrium partial differential equations (PDEs) (e.g., through the finite element method (FEM)). It maintains binary design variables and addresses the large-scale mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem that arises from discretizing the design space and PDEs. The core of this framework is the integration of the generalized Benders’ decomposition and adaptive trust regions. Specifically, by formulating the master sub-problem (decomposed from the MINLP) as a multi-cut optimization problem and enabling the estimation of the upper and lower bounds of the original objective function, significant acceleration in solution convergence is achieved. The trust region radius adapts based on a merit function. To mitigate ill-conditioning due to extreme parameter values, we further introduce a parameter relaxation scheme where two parameters are relaxed in stages at different paces, improving both solution quality and efficiency. Numerical tests validate the framework’s superior performance, including minimum compliance and compliant mechanism problems in single-material and multi-material designs. We compare our results with those of other methods and demonstrate significant reductions in optimization iterations (and therefore the number of FEM analyses required) by about one order of magnitude, while maintaining comparable optimal objective function values and material layouts. As the design variables and constraints increase, the framework maintains consistent solution quality and efficiency, underscoring its good scalability. We anticipate this framework will be especially advantageous for TO applications involving substantial design variables and constraints and requiring significant computational resources for FEM analyses (or PDE solving).
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Habitat International
7451 citations, 8.16%
|
|
Sustainability
6039 citations, 6.61%
|
|
Land
3742 citations, 4.1%
|
|
Cities
2883 citations, 3.16%
|
|
Land Use Policy
2703 citations, 2.96%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1826 citations, 2%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1379 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Sustainable Cities and Society
1172 citations, 1.28%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
1003 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
756 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Buildings
750 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Urban Studies
712 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, ASCE
699 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
619 citations, 0.68%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
603 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Applied Geography
595 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Remote Sensing
580 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
556 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
553 citations, 0.61%
|
|
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
514 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
480 citations, 0.53%
|
|
PLoS ONE
445 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Housing Studies
427 citations, 0.47%
|
|
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
423 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
418 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
382 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Landscape and Urban Planning
377 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
361 citations, 0.4%
|
|
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
356 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Geographical Sciences
349 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Building and Environment
343 citations, 0.38%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
339 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
336 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Urban Forum
317 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
283 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Geo Journal
276 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Heliyon
269 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Chinese Geographical Science
249 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Geoforum
249 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Construction Management and Economics
244 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Transport Geography
241 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
241 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Urban Geography
239 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
229 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
222 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Waste Management
222 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Growth and Change
221 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Construction Management
211 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
208 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Scientific Reports
206 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Environment and Planning A
206 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Waste Management and Research
205 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
200 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Population, Space and Place
195 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Urban Affairs
192 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE
189 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Energy and Buildings
188 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
186 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
184 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Urban Book Series
183 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Environment and Urbanization
183 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
180 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
167 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainable Development
161 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
160 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Housing Policy
160 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
159 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energies
159 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
157 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Property Management
155 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
153 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Natural Hazards
152 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Urban Management
151 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
150 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
147 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Urban Climate
147 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Development
145 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE
143 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
141 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Urban Sciences
139 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
136 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Urban Science
136 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
134 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development
133 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
131 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment
131 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Planning Studies
125 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Land Degradation and Development
121 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
119 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
119 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Local Environment
119 citations, 0.13%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
118 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Forests
116 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Transport Policy
112 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Environmental Science and Policy
110 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Planning Education and Research
110 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Big Data Analytics for Smart Urban Systems
105 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Energy Policy
104 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Housing Policy Debate
103 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Progress in Planning
101 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Elsevier
31374 citations, 34.36%
|
|
MDPI
15253 citations, 16.71%
|
|
Springer Nature
10879 citations, 11.92%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
8744 citations, 9.58%
|
|
SAGE
3440 citations, 3.77%
|
|
Wiley
3397 citations, 3.72%
|
|
Emerald
3050 citations, 3.34%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1453 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1209 citations, 1.32%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1023 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
649 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
621 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
538 citations, 0.59%
|
|
IGI Global
500 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
443 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
347 citations, 0.38%
|
|
EDP Sciences
249 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Oxford University Press
243 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
217 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Thomas Telford
158 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
154 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IWA Publishing
145 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AIP Publishing
125 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
120 citations, 0.13%
|
|
World Scientific
119 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SciELO
115 citations, 0.13%
|
|
OpenEdition
96 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
90 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
89 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
82 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Copernicus
71 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
70 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
69 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AOSIS
61 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The City Planning Institute of Japan
59 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
57 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
54 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ain Shams University
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
45 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CAIRN
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
39 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
38 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Real Estate Society
38 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Academic Journals
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Higher Education Press
32 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Editora Champagnat
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
30 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Natural Resources
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cogitatio
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
26 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
26 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
24 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Stichting Architecten Research
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Russian Geographical Society
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
College Publications
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexandria University
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science in China Press
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Science and Development
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Housing Association
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Royal Society
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Berkeley Electronic Press
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
James Cook University
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Sustainable Building Research Center
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
PeerJ
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
152 publications, 3.88%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
111 publications, 2.83%
|
|
Zhejiang University
73 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
68 publications, 1.74%
|
|
National University of Singapore
61 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Peking University
55 publications, 1.4%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
53 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
43 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University College London
43 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Nanjing University
40 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Wuhan University
35 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Renmin University of China
33 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Tsinghua University
32 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
31 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Asian Institute of Technology
29 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
28 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Chongqing University
26 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics
25 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Tongji University
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Melbourne
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Cardiff University
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Sheffield
24 publications, 0.61%
|
|
King Saud University
23 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Southeast University
23 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
23 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Newcastle University
23 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Utrecht University
23 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Cape Town
22 publications, 0.56%
|
|
East China Normal University
21 publications, 0.54%
|
|
China Agricultural University
19 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
18 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Birmingham
18 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Queensland
18 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
18 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
17 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Cambridge
17 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Dar es Salaam
17 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Seoul National University
16 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Nairobi
16 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
15 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Loughborough University
15 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Harvard University
15 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Guangxi University
15 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of New South Wales
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Liverpool
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Manchester
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Tokyo
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Utah
14 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
13 publications, 0.33%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
13 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of South Australia
13 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
13 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
13 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
South China University of Technology
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Columbia University
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Ibadan
12 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Central University of Finance and Economics
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Griffith University
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of South Florida
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Botswana
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
11 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Shenzhen University
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Tianjin University
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Guangzhou University
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Sydney
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
McGill University
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Reading
10 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Malaya
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Central China Normal University
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Southwest University
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Curtin University
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Makerere University
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
9 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Sichuan University
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Twente
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Glasgow
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Adelaide
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Obafemi Awolowo University
8 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
![]() Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
37 publications, 5%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
28 publications, 3.78%
|
|
Zhejiang University
20 publications, 2.7%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
18 publications, 2.43%
|
|
Peking University
16 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Renmin University of China
16 publications, 2.16%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
16 publications, 2.16%
|
|
China Agricultural University
13 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Tsinghua University
12 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Tongji University
12 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Guangxi University
12 publications, 1.62%
|
|
University of Melbourne
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
10 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
10 publications, 1.35%
|
|
East China Normal University
10 publications, 1.35%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Wuhan University
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Manchester
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Southeast University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Chongqing University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Hunan University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Central China Normal University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Guangzhou University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Hangzhou City University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Izmir Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Nanjing University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tianjin University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Seoul National University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Newcastle University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Ardhi University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Cardiff University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Tokyo
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University College Dublin
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Calcutta
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Presidency University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
South China University of Technology
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Sichuan University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cambridge
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Glasgow
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of South Australia
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cape Town
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Bandung Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Hanyang University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Twente
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
ETH Zurich
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Southwest University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Shenzhen University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Huaqiao University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Northwest University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Shandong University of Finance and Economics
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Charles University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Griffith University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Chungnam National University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Henan University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Northwest Normal University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Victoria
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Belgrade
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
China
|
China, 975, 24.89%
China
975 publications, 24.89%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 467, 11.92%
United Kingdom
467 publications, 11.92%
|
USA
|
USA, 430, 10.98%
USA
430 publications, 10.98%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 170, 4.34%
Australia
170 publications, 4.34%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 164, 4.19%
Netherlands
164 publications, 4.19%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 112, 2.86%
Canada
112 publications, 2.86%
|
India
|
India, 94, 2.4%
India
94 publications, 2.4%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 86, 2.2%
Nigeria
86 publications, 2.2%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 83, 2.12%
Germany
83 publications, 2.12%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 81, 2.07%
South Africa
81 publications, 2.07%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 77, 1.97%
Singapore
77 publications, 1.97%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 68, 1.74%
Japan
68 publications, 1.74%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 67, 1.71%
Republic of Korea
67 publications, 1.71%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 56, 1.43%
Brazil
56 publications, 1.43%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 51, 1.3%
Turkey
51 publications, 1.3%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 48, 1.23%
Saudi Arabia
48 publications, 1.23%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 47, 1.2%
Kenya
47 publications, 1.2%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 46, 1.17%
Malaysia
46 publications, 1.17%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 44, 1.12%
Tanzania
44 publications, 1.12%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 39, 1%
Indonesia
39 publications, 1%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 38, 0.97%
Sweden
38 publications, 0.97%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 37, 0.94%
Thailand
37 publications, 0.94%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 36, 0.92%
Iran
36 publications, 0.92%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 33, 0.84%
Spain
33 publications, 0.84%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 31, 0.79%
Italy
31 publications, 0.79%
|
France
|
France, 30, 0.77%
France
30 publications, 0.77%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 27, 0.69%
Ghana
27 publications, 0.69%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 22, 0.56%
Belgium
22 publications, 0.56%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 22, 0.56%
Israel
22 publications, 0.56%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 22, 0.56%
Switzerland
22 publications, 0.56%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 19, 0.49%
Mexico
19 publications, 0.49%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 19, 0.49%
Chile
19 publications, 0.49%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 16, 0.41%
Denmark
16 publications, 0.41%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 15, 0.38%
Portugal
15 publications, 0.38%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 15, 0.38%
Bangladesh
15 publications, 0.38%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 15, 0.38%
Colombia
15 publications, 0.38%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 15, 0.38%
New Zealand
15 publications, 0.38%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 15, 0.38%
Uganda
15 publications, 0.38%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 14, 0.36%
Botswana
14 publications, 0.36%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 14, 0.36%
Poland
14 publications, 0.36%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 0.36%
Finland
14 publications, 0.36%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 13, 0.33%
Argentina
13 publications, 0.33%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 13, 0.33%
Egypt
13 publications, 0.33%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 13, 0.33%
Norway
13 publications, 0.33%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 12, 0.31%
Vietnam
12 publications, 0.31%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 11, 0.28%
Jordan
11 publications, 0.28%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 11, 0.28%
Pakistan
11 publications, 0.28%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 9, 0.23%
Romania
9 publications, 0.23%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 9, 0.23%
Czech Republic
9 publications, 0.23%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 8, 0.2%
Peru
8 publications, 0.2%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 8, 0.2%
Serbia
8 publications, 0.2%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.18%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.18%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 6, 0.15%
Austria
6 publications, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.15%
Greece
6 publications, 0.15%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 6, 0.15%
Iraq
6 publications, 0.15%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 6, 0.15%
Nepal
6 publications, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 6, 0.15%
Philippines
6 publications, 0.15%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 5, 0.13%
Hungary
5 publications, 0.13%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 5, 0.13%
Sudan
5 publications, 0.13%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.1%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 4, 0.1%
Zimbabwe
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 4, 0.1%
Rwanda
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.1%
Croatia
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 4, 0.1%
Sri Lanka
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 4, 0.1%
Ethiopia
4 publications, 0.1%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.08%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 3, 0.08%
Burkina Faso
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 3, 0.08%
Cuba
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.08%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.08%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.08%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.08%
UAE
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 3, 0.08%
Oman
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 3, 0.08%
Papua New Guinea
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 3, 0.08%
Fiji
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 0.08%
Ecuador
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.05%
Russia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 2, 0.05%
Albania
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.05%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 2, 0.05%
Bolivia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 0.05%
Cambodia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.05%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.05%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.05%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.05%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 0.05%
Mongolia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 2, 0.05%
Trinidad and Tobago
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.05%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.05%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 2, 0.05%
USSR
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.03%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.03%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.03%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.03%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.03%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.03%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Lesotho
|
Lesotho, 1, 0.03%
Lesotho
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.03%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.03%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.03%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Niger
|
Niger, 1, 0.03%
Niger
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
China
|
China, 279, 37.7%
China
279 publications, 37.7%
|
USA
|
USA, 59, 7.97%
USA
59 publications, 7.97%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 55, 7.43%
United Kingdom
55 publications, 7.43%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 36, 4.86%
Australia
36 publications, 4.86%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 26, 3.51%
Germany
26 publications, 3.51%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 23, 3.11%
Canada
23 publications, 3.11%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 2.57%
Netherlands
19 publications, 2.57%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 16, 2.16%
Ghana
16 publications, 2.16%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 16, 2.16%
Iran
16 publications, 2.16%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 16, 2.16%
Republic of Korea
16 publications, 2.16%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 15, 2.03%
Turkey
15 publications, 2.03%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 14, 1.89%
Italy
14 publications, 1.89%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 14, 1.89%
Japan
14 publications, 1.89%
|
India
|
India, 13, 1.76%
India
13 publications, 1.76%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 1.49%
South Africa
11 publications, 1.49%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 9, 1.22%
Brazil
9 publications, 1.22%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 1.08%
Spain
8 publications, 1.08%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.95%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.95%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 7, 0.95%
Czech Republic
7 publications, 0.95%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.81%
Israel
6 publications, 0.81%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.81%
Poland
6 publications, 0.81%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.81%
Chile
6 publications, 0.81%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.68%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.68%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.68%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.68%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.68%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.68%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 5, 0.68%
Tanzania
5 publications, 0.68%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.54%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.54%
Romania
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.54%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.41%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.41%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.41%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.41%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.41%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.41%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.41%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.41%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 0.41%
Uganda
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.41%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.41%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.41%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.27%
France
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.27%
Austria
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 2, 0.27%
Albania
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.27%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.27%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.27%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.27%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.27%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.27%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.27%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.27%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.14%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.14%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.14%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.14%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.14%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.14%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.14%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.14%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.14%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.14%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.14%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.14%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.14%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.14%
UAE
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.14%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.14%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 1, 0.14%
Somalia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.14%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.14%
Finland
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.14%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.14%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Show all (42 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
1 profile journal article
Sheludkov Alexander

Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences
21 publications,
55 citations
h-index: 4
1 profile journal article
Bara Safarova
2 publications,
7 citations
h-index: 2
1 profile journal article
Lam Cindy
Professor

University of Hong Kong
304 publications,
7 127 citations
h-index: 42
1 profile journal article
Chen Hao

Auburn University
23 publications,
1 048 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Shafiq Nasir

Petronas University of Technology
235 publications,
3 828 citations
h-index: 32