Open Access
Translational Vision Science and Technology

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
ISSN:
21642591
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.6
SJR
1.059
CiteScore
5.7
Categories
Biomedical Engineering
Ophthalmology
Areas
Engineering
Medicine
Years of issue
2013-2025
journal names
Translational Vision Science and Technology
TRANSL VIS SCI TECHN
Top-3 citing journals

Translational Vision Science and Technology
(1780 citations)

Scientific Reports
(906 citations)

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
(896 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(130 publications)

University of Melbourne
(106 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(79 publications)

Harvard University
(92 publications)

University of Melbourne
(61 publications)

Sun Yat-sen University
(59 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2047
Q1

Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Green Innovation in China
Peng W., Su X., Tang Y.
Cities are important carriers of green innovation. The foundation for accelerating China’s ecological civilization construction and fostering regionally coordinated and sustainable development is quantitative analysis of the spatial evolution pattern and influencing factors of urban green innovation, as well as revealing the development differences between regions. This study’s research object includes 284 Chinese cities that are at the prefecture level or above, excluding Xizang, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan of China due to incomplete data. The spatial evolution characteristics of urban green innovation in China between 2005 and 2021 are comprehensively described using the gravity center model and boxplot analysis. The factors that affect urban green innovation are examined using the spatial Durbin model (SDM). The findings indicate that: 1) over the period of the study, the gravity center of urban green innovation in China has always been distributed in the Henan-Anhui border region, showing a migration characteristic of “initially shifting northeast, subsequently southeast”, and the migration speed has gradually increased. 2) Although there are also noticeable disparities in east-west, the north-south gap is the main cause of the shift in China’s urban green innovation gravity center. The primary areas of urban green innovation in China are the cities with green innovation levels higher than the median. 3) The main influencing factor of urban green innovation is the industrial structure level. The effect of the financial development level, the government intervention level, and the openness to the outside world degree on urban green innovation is weakened in turn. The environmental regulation degree is not truly influencing urban green innovation. The impact of various factors on green innovation across cities of different sizes, exhibiting heterogeneity. This study is conducive to broadening the academic community’s comprehension of the spatial evolution characteristics of urban green innovation and offering a theoretical framework for developing policies for the all-encompassing green transformation of social and economic growth.
Q1

Impact of Drought on Farmers’ Livelihood Vulnerability: A Case Study of County-level Units in Western Jilin Province, China
Zhang J., Han Y., Fang Y., Xu Y., Chen C., Liu Z., Wang F., Zhuang L., Huang F.
Agricultural drought, a prolonged disaster with widespread impacts, exerts tremendous pressure on farm household activities, agricultural production, and economic development. The western region of Jilin Province, China, located in a semi-arid zone, where persistents drought exacerbates ecological fragility. With a larger proportion of its population living in rural areas, the life and production activities of households are particularly susceptible to drought-related challenges. This study focuses on the western part of Jilin Province, utilizing remote sensing data to calculate the temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) as a soil moisture monitoring indicator for drought assessment. The livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) and the improved LVI-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) index are employed to comprehensively assess the livelihood vulnerability of communes in the region and the impact of drought conditions on farmers’ livelihood vulnerability. The results reveal a spatial trend of increasing drought severity from northeast to southwest, with temporally minor fluctuations observed in drought levels from 2005 to 2022. Livelihood vulnerability results indicate significant spatial and temporal variations, with education, health, food, and water playing key roles. Correlation analysis indicates a strong relationship between TVDI and LVI, highlighting the detrimental impact of drought on farmers’ livelihoods. The study aims to provide a scientific foundation for managing livelihood vulnerability in the western part of Jilin Province and similar arid areas. Additionally, it seeks to offer strategic recommendations for policymakers to mitigate the adverse effects of drought, thereby reducing farmers’ vulnerability and fostering sustainable socio-economic development.
Q1

Digital Economy’s Impact on Carbon Emission Performance: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China
Zhang X., Qiu F., Liu J.
Climate change caused by carbon emissions is a hot topic of concern. Enhancing carbon emission performance (CEP) emerges as a pivotal strategy to curtail carbon emissions, with the digital economy recognized as a crucial instrument for bolstering CEP. Grounded in theoretical analysis, this article takes the Yangtze River Delta region (YRD) as the research object and conducts empirical analysis for the period from 2010 to 2021. The Super Epsilon-Based Measure (EBM) model was employed to assess CEP, while the entropy method was used to quantify the level of the digital economy. Baseline regression models and mediation effect models were constructed to test the research hypotheses. Additionally, the Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) was utilized to analyze the spatial spillover effects of the digital economy. Some conclusions were drawn as follows. Firstly, both the digital economy and CEP exhibit growing trends and demonstrate significant spatial distribution characteristics. Cities with high CEP are increasingly concentrated along the Yangtze River and coastal areas. Meanwhile, the digital economy generally demonstrates a spatial distribution pattern of being higher in the southeast and lower in the northwest. Secondly, the digital economy exerts a notable and consistent positive influence on CEP, but this impact is not primarily achieved through promoting green technology innovation. Instead, the digital economy exhibits a stronger intermediary effect on CEP by facilitating industrial structure upgrading and rationalization. Thirdly, the digital economy significantly enhancing local CEP but having an insignificant impact on neighboring cities’ CEP. To address these findings, cities ought to invest in digital infrastructure, incentivize digital innovation through policy and financial backing, and harness advanced technologies like 5G and blockchain to promote low-carbon, intelligent production and lifestyles, while enhancing industrial structure and regional cooperation to foster a low-carbon digital economy network.
Q1

Quantifying and Mapping the Effects of Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Competitiveness: A Case Study in Shandong Province, China
Zhong J., Sun Q., Qi W., Yu X.
Quantifying and mapping how ecosystem services impact agricultural competitiveness is crucial for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations. However, few study quantified agricultural competitiveness and mapped the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness using multiple models. In this study, multi-source data from 2000 to 2020 were utilized to establish the indicator system of agricultural competitiveness; five ecosystem services were quantified using computation models; Geographic Information System (GIS) spatial analysis was used to explore the spatial patterns of agricultural competitiveness and ecosystem services; geographic detector models were applied to investigate the effects and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. Shandong Province of China was selected as the case study area. The results demonstrated that: 1) there was a significant increase in agricultural competitiveness during the study period, with high levels observed mainly in the east region of the study area. 2) The spatial distribution patterns of ecosystem services and agricultural competitiveness primarily exhibited High-High and Low-Low Cluster types. 3) Habitat quality emerged as the main driving factor of agricultural competitiveness in 2000 and 2020, while water yield played a substantial role in 2010. 4) The coupling of two ecosystem services exerted a greater effect on agricultural competitiveness compared to individual ecosystem service. The innovations of this study are constructing an indicator system to quantify agricultural competitiveness, and exploring the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. This study proposed an indicator system to quantify agricultural competitiveness, which can be applied in other regions, and explored the effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness. The findings of this study can serve as valuable insights for policymakers to formulate tailored agricultural development policies that take into account the synergistic effects of ecosystem services on agricultural competitiveness.
Q1

Intercity Mobility and Coupled Landscapes of Multidimensional Regionalization in Western China
Jiang F., Li T., Li J.
Intercity mobility lays the foundation for capital flow, information flow, and knowledge flow, etc., and is important for promoting regional integration. Although many scholars have studied intercity mobility in extensive well-developed urban agglomerations, few studies have examined the characteristics of intercity mobility at the county level and its impact on regionalization in western China. This study takes the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration (GPUA) as a case to study the geographical law of intercity mobility and then explore its impact on regionalization. The results obtained show that intercity mobility network exhibits a hub and spoke patterns focusing on major municipal districts at the county level. We also found a corridor effect that counties with higher travel volumes are mostly located along the trunk high speed railway (HSR) lines. Unlike previous studies, the distribution of intercity mobility is more concentrated than that of population and exhibits a super-linear behavior rule. There are the differences in gravity law for overall trips, weekday trips, weekend trips, and holiday trips. With the decrease of travel duration, the effect of attraction of destination is weakening, but the influence of distance decay is increasing. Finally, the spatial organization is still administrative-centric and is dominated by intraprefecture and intra-provincial development. Moreover, the coupled degree between network-based regionalization and attribute-based regionalization shows a decreasing trend from administrative via cultural to physical factors. These findings enrich the research on the intercity mobility and the regionalization in inland developing urban agglomerations.
Q1

Effects of Lignite Humic Acid and Lignite Humic Acid-based Combined Amendment on Soil Quality in Saline-sodic Farmlands in the West Liaohe Plain, China
Nie Z., Zhang L., Zhang T., Guo L., Zhou J., An F., Ma H., Wang Z., Yang F.
Water scarcity and soil salinization pose significant challenges to agriculture in the West Liaohe Plain, eastern Inner Mongolia, China. Shallow-buried drip irrigation can improve soil water use efficiency to alleviate water shortage in agriculture and the application of lignite humic acid reduces the adverse effects of soil salinization. However, further research is needed to investigate the effects of different application rates of lignite humic acid and humic acid-based combined amendment on soil physicochemical properties, nutrient contents, and crop yield in saline-sodic farmlands under shallow-buried drip irrigation. A two-year field experiment was conducted with control without any amendment (CK), three treatments amended with 3 t/ha (H1), 6 t/ha (H2), and 12 t/ha (H3) lignite humic acid, and three application rates with 15 t/ha (T1), 22.5 t/ha (T2), and 30 t/ha (T3) lignite humic acid-based combined amendment in 2021 and 2022. The results showed that H3 reduced soil bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, and total alkalinity, while increasing the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and available potassium in the two-year experiment. Moreover, the maize yield in H3 increased by an average of 35.5%. T2 decreased soil bulk density, pH, total alkalinity, and increased maize yield by 16.2%, compared to the first year. These results suggest that T2 consistently improved both soil quality and crop yield. Correlation analyses showed that lignite humic acid and its complexes promote maize growth and increase yield by increasing soil organic matter and total nitrogen while reducing soil salinity and total alkalinity. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the field data and the results of the comprehensive evaluation of soil quality, it was determined that the appropriate improvement measures for saline-sodic farmlands under shallow-buried drip irrigation are the application of 12 t/ha of lignite humic acid and 22.5 t/ha of lignite humic acid-based combined amendment. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of lignite humic acid and its combined amendment in mitigating the constraints of saline-sodic farmlands and enhancing crop yields, providing a sustainable solution for improving saline-sodic farmlands in the West Liaohe Plain.
Q1

Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services Values in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China in the Context of National Water Network Project Construction
Liu L., Zheng L., Wang Y., Liu C., Zhang B., Bi Y.
Investigating the ecological impact of land use change in the context of the construction of national water network project is crucial, as it is imperative for achieving the sustainable development goals of the national water network and guaranteeing regional ecological stability. Using the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area (DRA), China as the study area, this paper first examined the spatiotemporal dynamics of natural landscape patterns and ecosystem service values (ESV) in the DRA from 2000 to 2018 and then investigated the spatial clustering characteristics of the ESV using spatial statistical analysis tools. Finally, the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model was used to simulate the natural landscape and future changes in the ESV of the DRA from 2018 to 2028 under four different development scenarios: business as usual (BAU), economic development (ED), ecological protection (EP), and shoreline protection (SP). The results show that: during 2000–2018, the construction of water facilities had a significant impact on regional land use/land cover (LULC) change, with a 24 830 ha increase in watershed area. ESV exhibited an increasing trend, with a significant and growing spatial clustering effect. The transformation of farmland to water bodies led to accelerated ESV growth, while the transformation of forest land to farmland led to a decrease in the ESV. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) had the strongest effect on the ESV. ESV exhibited a continuous increase from 2018 to 2028 under all the simulation scenarios. The EP scenario had the greatest increase in ESV, while the ED scenario had the smallest increase. The findings suggest that projected land use patterns under different scenarios have varied impacts on ecosystem services (ESs) and that the management and planning of the DRA should balance social, economic, ecological, and security benefits.nomic, ecological, and security benefits.
Q1

Water Quality, Influential Factors, and Management Strategies from 2016 to 2020 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
Lin L., Guo C., Chen Y., He L., Yan L., Fang D., Ma G., Zhang F., Li M.
The Yangtze River economic belt (YREB), China is important to the Chinese economy and for supporting sustainable development. Clarifying the relationship between water quality indices and socioeconomic indicators could help improve aquatic environment management in the YREB and our understanding of the causes and effects of water quality variations in other large river basins. In this study, river water quality, factors affecting water quality, and management strategies, and correlations between water quality indices and socioeconomic indicators in the YREB during the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020) were assessed. The single-factor evaluation method, constant price for GDP, and correlation analyses were adopted. The results showed that: 1) water quality in the YREB improved during the 13th Five-Year Plan period. The number of aquatic environment sections meeting Grade I–III water quality standards increased by 13.1% and the number below Grade V decreased by 2.9%. 2) The values of 12 indicators in the YREB exceeded relevant standards. The indicators with highest concentreation were the total phosphorus, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, and permanganate index, which were relatively high in downstream regions in Anhui Province, Jiangsu Province, and Shanghai Municipality. 3) Ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, and total phosphorus emissions per unit area and water extraction per unit area are relatively high in the three downstream regions mentioned above. 4) Increased domestic sewage discharges have increased total wastewater discharges in the YREB. 5) River water quality in the YREB strongly correlated with population, economic, and water resource indices and less strongly correlated with government investment, agriculture, meteorology, energy, and forestry indices. This confirmed the need to decrease wastewater discharges and non-point-source pollutant emissions. The aquatic environment could be improved by taking reasonable measures to control population growth, adjusting the industrial structure to accelerate industrial transformation and increase the proportion of tertiary industries, and investing in technological innovations to protect the environment.
Q1

Impact of Climate Change on Crop-cropland Coupling Relationship: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau in China
Li S., Liu Y., Shao Y., Wang X.
Climate change brings new challenges to the sustainable development of agriculture in the new era. Accurately grasping the patterns of climate change impacts on agricultural systems is crucial for ensuring agricultural sustainability and food security. Taking the Loess Plateau (LP), China as an example, this study used a coupling coordination degree model and spatial autocorrelation analysis to portray the spatial and temporal features of crop-cropland coupling relationship from 2000 to 2020 and explored the impact law of climate change through geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR). The results were as follows: 1) the crop-cropland coupling coordination degree of the LP showed a gradual upward trend from 2000 to 2020, forming a spatial pattern with lower values in the central region and higher values in the surrounding areas. 2) There was a positive correlation in the spatial distribution of crop-cropland coupling coordination degree in the LP from 2000 to 2020, and the high value-low value (H-L) and low value-low value (L-L) agglomerations continued to expand eastward, while the spatial and temporal evolution of the high value-high value (H-H) and low value-high value (L-H) agglomerations was not obvious. 3) The impacts of climatic elements on crop-cropland coupling coordination degree in the LP showed strong heterogeneity in time scales. The inhibitory impacts of summer days (SU) and frost days (FD) accounted for a higher proportion, while the annual average temperature (TEM) had both promoting and inhibiting impacts. The impacts proportion and intensity of extreme heavy precipitation day (R25), continuous drought days (CDD), and annual precipitation (PRE) all experienced significant changes. 4) In space, the impacts of SU and FD on the crop-cropland coupling coordination degree varied with latitude and altitude. The adaptability of the LP to R25 gradually strengthened, and the extensions of CDD and increase of PRE led to the increasing inhibition beyond the eastern region of LP, and TEM showed a promoting impact in the Fenwei Plain. As an important grain-producing area in China, the LP should actively deal with the impacts of climate change on the crop-cropland coupling relationship, vigorously safeguard food security, and promote sustainable agricultural development.
Q1

Spatial Patterns and Controlling Factors of Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen in the Three River Headwaters Region, China
Cui Q., Li Z., Feng Q., Zhang B., Zhao Y.
The alpine ecosystem has great potential for carbon sequestration. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) are highly sensitive to climate change, and their dynamics are crucial to revealing the effect of climate change on the structure, function, and services of the ecosystem. However, the spatial distribution and controlling factors of SOC and TN across various soil layers and vegetation types within this unique ecosystem remain inadequately understood. In this study, 256 soil samples in 89 sites were collected from the Three River Headwaters Region (TRHR) in China to investigate SOC and TN and to explore the primary factors affecting their distribution, including soil, vegetation, climate, and geography factors. The results show that SOC and TN contents in 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm soil layers are 24.40, 18.03, 14.04, 12.40 g/kg and 2.46, 1.90, 1.51, 1.17 g/kg, respectively; with higher concentrations observed in the southeastern region compared to the northwest of the TRHR. One-way analysis of variance reveals that SOC and TN levels are elevated in the alpine meadow and the alpine shrub relative to the alpine steppe in the 0–60 cm soil layers. The structural equation model explores that soil water content is the main controlling factor affecting the variation of SOC and TN. Moreover, the geography, climate, and vegetation factors notably indirectly affect SOC and TN through soil factors. Therefore, it can effectively improve soil water and nutrient conditions through vegetation restoration, soil improvement, and grazing management, and the change of SOC and TN can be fully understood by establishing monitoring networks to better protect soil carbon and nitrogen.
Q1

Changes in River Cross-section Morphology and Response to Streamflow and Sediment Processes in Middle Reaches of Yellow River, China
Wen Y., Li P., Li M., Ma C., Gao P., Mu X., Zhao G.
Changes in river cross-section morphology have decisive influences on the flood discharge and sand transport capacity of rivers; thus, these changes strongly reflect the vitality of a river. In this paper, based on the river cross-section and water and sediment data of two different periods (1974–1987 and 2007–2021), the trend analysis, change-point analysis and sediment rating curve method were used to analyze the change process of river cross-section morphology and its response to streamflow and sediment changes in the main river stream of the Yellow River at the Longmen hydrological station. From 1974 to 1987 (except in 1977), the riverbed experienced siltation, and the riverbed elevation rose. Conversely, from 2007 to 2021, the riverbed experienced scouring, and the riverbed elevation gradually decreased. The cross-section shape changed from rectangular to U-shaped (deeper on the right side) at the Longmen cross-section. The changes in streamflow and sediment processes significantly impacted the evolution of river cross-section. Streamflow (P < 0.05), sediment discharge (P < 0.01), and the sediment load coefficients (P < 0.01) decreased significantly. The relationship between the water depth and sediment load coefficients followed a power function. The decreasing trend in sediment discharge was significantly stronger than that in streamflow. Suspended sediment particles tended to become finer. The sediment rating curve indicates that the sediment supply from upstream decreased while the erosive power in the river channel increased, leading to a gradual decline in riverbed elevation at the Longmen cross-section from 2007 to 2021. These findings help us better understand the impacts of ecological restoration on changes in river streamflow and sediment during river evolution.
Q1

Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration in China
Zhu W., Zhang H., Zhang X., Guo H., Liu Y.
Rapid increases in Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels could trigger unpredictable climate change. The assessment of spatiotemporal variation and influencing factors of CO2 concentration are helpful in understanding the source/sink balance and supporting the formulation of climate policy. In this study, Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) data were used to explore the variability of CO2 concentrations in China from 2009 to 2020. Meteorological parameters, vegetation cover, and anthropogenic activities were combined to explain the increase in CO2 concentration, using pixel-based correlations and Covariance Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) analysis. The results showed that the influence of vertical CO2 transport diminished with altitude, with a distinct inter-annual increase in CO2 concentrations at 17 vertical levels. Spatially, the highest values were observed in East China, whereas the lowest were observed in Northwest China. There were significant seasonal variations in CO2 concentration, with maximum and minimum values in spring (April) and summer (August), respectively. According to the pixel-based correlation analysis, the near-surface CO2 concentration was positively correlated with population (r = 0.99, P < 0.001), Leaf Area Index (LAI, r = 0.95, P < 0.001), emissions (r = 0.91, P < 0.001), temperature (r = 0.60, P < 0.05), precipitation (r = 0.34, P > 0.05), soil water (r = 0.29, P > 0.05), nightlight (r = 0.28, P < 0.05); and negatively correlated with wind speed (r = −0.58, P < 0.05). CB-SEM analysis revealed that LAI was the most important controlling factor explaining CO2 concentration variation (total effect of 0.66), followed by emissions (0.58), temperature (0.45), precipitation (0.30), wind speed (−0.28), and soil water (−0.07). The model explained 93% of the increase in CO2 concentration. Our results provide crucial information on the patterns of CO2 concentrations and their driving mechanisms, which are particularly significant in the context of climate change.
Q1

Geographical Engineering and Its Role in Promoting Integrated Geography Research
Liu Y., Su S., Li X.
Throughout the contemporary Chinese history of geography, geographical engineering has consistently played a pivotal role as a fundamental scientific activity. It possesses its distinct ontological basis and value orientation, rendering it inseparable from being merely a derivative of geographical science or technology. This paper defines geographical engineering and introduces its development history through the lens of Chinese geographical engineering praxises. Furthermore, it is highlighted the logical and functional consistency between the theory of human-earth system and the praxis of geographical engineering. Six modern cases of geographical engineering projects are presented in detail to demonstrate the points and characteristics of different types of modern geographical engineering. Geographical engineering serves as an engine for promoting integrated geography research, and in response to the challenge posed by fragmented geographies, this paper advocates for an urgent revitalization of geographical engineering. The feasibility of revitalizing geographical engineering is guaranteed because it aligns with China’s national strategies.
Q1

Modeling of Spring Phenology of Boreal Forest by Coupling Machine Learning and Diurnal Temperature Indicators
Deng G., Zhang H., Hong Y., Guo X., Yi Z., Biniyaz E.
The roles of diurnal temperature in providing heat accumulation and chilling requirements for vegetation spring phenology differ. Although previous studies have established a stronger correlation between leaf onset and diurnal temperature than between leaf onset and average temperature, current research on modeling spring phenology based on diurnal temperature indicators remains limited. In this study, we confirmed the start of the growing season (SOS) sensitivity to diurnal temperature and average temperature in boreal forest. The estimation of SOS was carried out by employing K-Nearest Neighbor Regression (KNR-TDN) model, Random Forest Regression (RFR-TDN) model, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB-TDN) model and Light Gradient Boosting Machine model (LightGBM-TDN) driven by diurnal temperature indicators during 1982–2015, and the SOS was projected from 2015 to 2100 based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) climate scenario datasets. The sensitivity of boreal forest SOS to daytime temperature is greater than that to average temperature and nighttime temperature. The LightGBM-TDN model perform best across all vegetation types, exhibiting the lowest RMSE and bias compared to the KNR-TDN model, RFR-TDN model and XGB-TDN model. By incorporating diurnal temperature indicators instead of relying only on average temperature indicators to simulate spring phenology, an improvement in the accuracy of the model is achieved. Furthermore, the preseason accumulated daytime temperature, daytime temperature and snow cover end date emerged as significant drivers of the SOS simulation in the study area. The simulation results based on LightGBM-TDN model exhibit a trend of advancing SOS followed by stabilization under future climate scenarios. This study underscores the potential of diurnal temperature indicators as a viable alternative to average temperature indicators in driving spring phenology models, offering a promising new method for simulating spring phenology.
Q1

Light Use Efficiency Model Based on Chlorophyll Content Better Captures Seasonal Gross Primary Production Dynamics of Deciduous Broadleaf Forests
Yang R., Liu R., Liu Y., Chen J., Xu M., He J.
Gross primary production (GPP) is a crucial indicator representing the absorption of atmospheric CO2 by vegetation. At present, the estimation of GPP by remote sensing is mainly based on leaf-related vegetation indexes and leaf-related biophysical parameter leaf area index (LAI), which are not completely synchronized in seasonality with GPP. In this study, we proposed chlorophyll content-based light use efficiency model (CC-LUE) to improve GPP estimates, as chlorophyll is the direct site of photosynthesis, and only the light absorbed by chlorophyll is used in the photosynthetic process. The CC-LUE model is constructed by establishing a linear correlation between satellite-derived canopy chlorophyll content (Chlcanopy) and FPAR. This method was calibrated and validated utilizing 7-d averaged in-situ GPP data from 14 eddy covariance flux towers covering deciduous broadleaf forest ecosystems across five different climate zones. Results showed a relatively robust seasonal consistency between Chlcanopy with GPP in deciduous broadleaf forests under different climatic conditions. The CC-LUE model explained 88% of the in-situ GPP seasonality for all validation site-year and 56.0% of in-situ GPP variations through the growing season, outperforming the three widely used LUE models (MODIS-GPP algorithm, Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM), and the eddy covariance-light use efficiency model (EC-LUE)). Additionally, the CC-LUE model (RMSE = 0.50 g C/(m2·d)) significantly improved the underestimation of GPP during the growing season in semi-arid region, remarkably decreasing the root mean square error of averaged growing season GPP simulation and in-situ GPP by 75.4%, 73.4%, and 37.5%, compared with MOD17 (RMSE = 2.03 g C/(m2·d)), VPM (RMSE = 1.88 g C/(m2·d)), and EC-LUE (RMSE = 0.80 g C/(m2·d)) model. The chlorophyll-based method proved superior in capturing the seasonal variations of GPP in forest ecosystems, thereby providing the possibility of a more precise depiction of forest seasonal carbon uptake.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Translational Vision Science and Technology
1780 citations, 6.15%
|
|
Scientific Reports
906 citations, 3.13%
|
|
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
896 citations, 3.1%
|
|
American Journal of Ophthalmology
522 citations, 1.8%
|
|
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
466 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
462 citations, 1.6%
|
|
Eye
423 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Experimental Eye Research
416 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Biomedical Optics Express
394 citations, 1.36%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
376 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Ophthalmology Science
356 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
352 citations, 1.22%
|
|
PLoS ONE
336 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
318 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Diagnostics
300 citations, 1.04%
|
|
British Journal of Ophthalmology
294 citations, 1.02%
|
|
BMC Ophthalmology
271 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
266 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of Glaucoma
261 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Survey of Ophthalmology
231 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Acta Ophthalmologica
227 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Clinical Ophthalmology
225 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
221 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Ophthalmology
197 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Ophthalmology and Therapy
189 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Retina
186 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
183 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Current Eye Research
175 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Ophthalmology Retina
169 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Clinical and Experimental Optometry
166 citations, 0.57%
|
|
International Ophthalmology
158 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Ophthalmology Glaucoma
155 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Cornea
154 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
151 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Optometry and Vision Science
150 citations, 0.52%
|
|
European Journal of Ophthalmology
148 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
148 citations, 0.51%
|
|
JAMA Ophthalmology
146 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
142 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
135 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Ocular Surface
129 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
122 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Cells
122 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Bioengineering
116 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Ophthalmology
114 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
106 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
101 citations, 0.35%
|
|
IEEE Access
96 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Seminars in Ophthalmology
93 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Biomedicines
92 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
91 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Ophthalmology
90 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde
89 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
86 citations, 0.3%
|
|
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
85 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cureus
85 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Eye and Vision
84 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Refractive Surgery
83 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
83 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
81 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
78 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Sensors
78 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Vision
71 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Life
71 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Ophthalmic Research
69 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
69 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation
69 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
68 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Documenta Ophthalmologica
67 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Heliyon
67 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Vision Research
65 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ophthalmic Genetics
64 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
63 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
61 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Neural Engineering
61 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
60 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Genes
59 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Annual Review of Vision Science
59 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie
58 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
58 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
57 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Ophthalmology Clinics
57 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Experimental Biology and Medicine
57 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Antioxidants
56 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Eye and Contact Lens
54 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
53 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
52 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Controlled Release
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biomolecules
50 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology
49 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Photonics
47 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
46 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cancers
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nature Communications
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Medicina
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Ophthalmologica
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nutrients
41 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMJ Open
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Elsevier
5599 citations, 19.36%
|
|
Springer Nature
4698 citations, 16.24%
|
|
MDPI
2852 citations, 9.86%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
2758 citations, 9.54%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1770 citations, 6.12%
|
|
Wiley
1501 citations, 5.19%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1283 citations, 4.44%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1079 citations, 3.73%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
601 citations, 2.08%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
522 citations, 1.8%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
515 citations, 1.78%
|
|
BMJ
485 citations, 1.68%
|
|
SAGE
431 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
365 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
237 citations, 0.82%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
179 citations, 0.62%
|
|
SLACK
170 citations, 0.59%
|
|
S. Karger AG
150 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
140 citations, 0.48%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
139 citations, 0.48%
|
|
IOP Publishing
134 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Oxford University Press
127 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
123 citations, 0.43%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
97 citations, 0.34%
|
|
92 citations, 0.32%
|
|
JMIR Publications
90 citations, 0.31%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
84 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Annual Reviews
70 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
64 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Medknow
59 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
59 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
57 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IntechOpen
54 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
46 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
41 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
38 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Real Time, Ltd.
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
27 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
27 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Colegio Nacional de Opticos-Optometristas de Espana
26 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Touch Medical Media LTD.
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
24 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
24 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AIP Publishing
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
World Scientific
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physiological Society
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Iranian Society of Ophthalmology
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Impact Journals
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Portland Press
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Engineering Geology
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
ASME International
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Institute of Eye Diseases
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Retina Society
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Laser Surgery and Medicine
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Foundation for the Blind
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science in China Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Begell House
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Veterinary World
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Ophthalmological Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
Harvard University
130 publications, 4.78%
|
|
University of Melbourne
106 publications, 3.9%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
79 publications, 2.91%
|
|
Centre for Eye Research Australia
75 publications, 2.76%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
70 publications, 2.58%
|
|
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
70 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
69 publications, 2.54%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
64 publications, 2.36%
|
|
Stanford University
57 publications, 2.1%
|
|
Columbia University
56 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University College London
52 publications, 1.91%
|
|
Duke University
50 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
48 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of Miami
43 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
42 publications, 1.55%
|
|
National University of Singapore
41 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
40 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
40 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of New South Wales
39 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of Southern California
39 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of Western Australia
39 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of Washington
39 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Fudan University
37 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
37 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Michigan
37 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
37 publications, 1.36%
|
|
National Eye Institute
37 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
36 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
33 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
32 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Tübingen
29 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
29 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Capital Medical University
29 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
29 publications, 1.07%
|
|
City, University of London
27 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
27 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
26 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
26 publications, 0.96%
|
|
New York University
26 publications, 0.96%
|
|
L. V. Prasad Eye Institute
25 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
25 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Utah
25 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Sydney
24 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Tokyo
24 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
24 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
24 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Peking University
23 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Medical University of Vienna
22 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Sorbonne University
22 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
21 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Ohio State University
21 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of California, Davis
21 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Oxford
20 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Emory University
20 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
19 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tianjin Medical University
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Royal Perth Hospital
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Northwestern University
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Waterloo
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
18 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
17 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Jinan University
17 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
17 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Cardiff University
17 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Houston
17 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Basel
16 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Liverpool
16 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Manchester
16 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Auckland
16 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Toronto
16 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
15 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
15 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Florida
15 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Flinders University
14 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
14 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Keio University
14 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Osaka University
14 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
14 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Central South University
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Australian National University
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University Hospital Bonn
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Lübeck
13 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Zurich
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Chang Gung University
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Seoul National University
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Minnesota
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
12 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Harvard University
92 publications, 4.62%
|
|
University of Melbourne
61 publications, 3.06%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
59 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
50 publications, 2.51%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
47 publications, 2.36%
|
|
Centre for Eye Research Australia
43 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
42 publications, 2.11%
|
|
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
41 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
39 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Stanford University
39 publications, 1.96%
|
|
University College London
36 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Miami
34 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Duke University
33 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
32 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Columbia University
31 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
31 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Washington
30 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
29 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Fudan University
29 publications, 1.46%
|
|
National Eye Institute
29 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of New South Wales
28 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
28 publications, 1.41%
|
|
University of Michigan
28 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
28 publications, 1.41%
|
|
National University of Singapore
27 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Western Australia
27 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Capital Medical University
26 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
26 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
26 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
24 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
23 publications, 1.16%
|
|
City, University of London
23 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Southern California
23 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
21 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Tübingen
20 publications, 1%
|
|
Peking University
20 publications, 1%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
20 publications, 1%
|
|
L. V. Prasad Eye Institute
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Medical University of Vienna
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
New York University
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of California, Davis
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
19 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
18 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Utah
18 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
17 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
17 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Jinan University
16 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Tianjin Medical University
16 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
16 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
16 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Oxford
15 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
15 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
15 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
15 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Liverpool
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Sorbonne University
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Sydney
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Northwestern University
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Ohio State University
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Toronto
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University Hospital Bonn
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Cardiff University
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Tokyo
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Central South University
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Royal Perth Hospital
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Houston
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Manchester
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Taiwan University
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Auckland
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Osaka University
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Waterloo
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Florida
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Zurich
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Australian National University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Flinders University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Emory University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sichuan University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bern
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Chang Gung University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Yale University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Seoul National University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Northeastern University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1235, 45.45%
USA
1235 publications, 45.45%
|
China
|
China, 460, 16.93%
China
460 publications, 16.93%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 295, 10.86%
United Kingdom
295 publications, 10.86%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 226, 8.32%
Australia
226 publications, 8.32%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 212, 7.8%
Germany
212 publications, 7.8%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 160, 5.89%
Japan
160 publications, 5.89%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 107, 3.94%
Italy
107 publications, 3.94%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 97, 3.57%
Switzerland
97 publications, 3.57%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 90, 3.31%
Republic of Korea
90 publications, 3.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 87, 3.2%
Canada
87 publications, 3.2%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 86, 3.17%
Netherlands
86 publications, 3.17%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 83, 3.05%
Singapore
83 publications, 3.05%
|
India
|
India, 67, 2.47%
India
67 publications, 2.47%
|
France
|
France, 63, 2.32%
France
63 publications, 2.32%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 63, 2.32%
Spain
63 publications, 2.32%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 44, 1.62%
Brazil
44 publications, 1.62%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 39, 1.44%
Austria
39 publications, 1.44%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 36, 1.32%
Israel
36 publications, 1.32%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 23, 0.85%
Belgium
23 publications, 0.85%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 19, 0.7%
Egypt
19 publications, 0.7%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 19, 0.7%
Sweden
19 publications, 0.7%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 17, 0.63%
New Zealand
17 publications, 0.63%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 16, 0.59%
Portugal
16 publications, 0.59%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 16, 0.59%
Denmark
16 publications, 0.59%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 16, 0.59%
Poland
16 publications, 0.59%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 16, 0.59%
Thailand
16 publications, 0.59%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 13, 0.48%
Turkey
13 publications, 0.48%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 0.44%
Mexico
12 publications, 0.44%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.4%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.4%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 0.33%
Iran
9 publications, 0.33%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 0.33%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 0.33%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 0.29%
Norway
8 publications, 0.29%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.26%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.26%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.22%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 0.22%
Qatar
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.18%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 0.18%
Finland
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.15%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.15%
Greece
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.15%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.15%
Croatia
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 0.11%
Ghana
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.11%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.11%
|
French Polynesia
|
French Polynesia, 3, 0.11%
French Polynesia
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.07%
Russia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.07%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.07%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.07%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.07%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.07%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.07%
UAE
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.07%
Romania
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.07%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.07%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.07%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.04%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.04%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.04%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.04%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.04%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.04%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.04%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.04%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Liberia
|
Liberia, 1, 0.04%
Liberia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.04%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.04%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.04%
Oman
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.04%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.04%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.04%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.04%
Chile
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.04%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.04%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.04%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Show all (43 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 866, 43.5%
USA
866 publications, 43.5%
|
China
|
China, 394, 19.79%
China
394 publications, 19.79%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 216, 10.85%
United Kingdom
216 publications, 10.85%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 164, 8.24%
Germany
164 publications, 8.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 146, 7.33%
Australia
146 publications, 7.33%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 114, 5.73%
Japan
114 publications, 5.73%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 85, 4.27%
Italy
85 publications, 4.27%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 74, 3.72%
Republic of Korea
74 publications, 3.72%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 73, 3.67%
Switzerland
73 publications, 3.67%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 65, 3.26%
Netherlands
65 publications, 3.26%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 61, 3.06%
Canada
61 publications, 3.06%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 57, 2.86%
Singapore
57 publications, 2.86%
|
India
|
India, 49, 2.46%
India
49 publications, 2.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 45, 2.26%
Spain
45 publications, 2.26%
|
France
|
France, 43, 2.16%
France
43 publications, 2.16%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 29, 1.46%
Brazil
29 publications, 1.46%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 28, 1.41%
Austria
28 publications, 1.41%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 25, 1.26%
Israel
25 publications, 1.26%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 18, 0.9%
Belgium
18 publications, 0.9%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 14, 0.7%
Sweden
14 publications, 0.7%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 13, 0.65%
Portugal
13 publications, 0.65%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 13, 0.65%
Poland
13 publications, 0.65%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 13, 0.65%
Thailand
13 publications, 0.65%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 12, 0.6%
Denmark
12 publications, 0.6%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 12, 0.6%
New Zealand
12 publications, 0.6%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 10, 0.5%
Turkey
10 publications, 0.5%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 0.45%
Egypt
9 publications, 0.45%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 9, 0.45%
Mexico
9 publications, 0.45%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 0.4%
Ireland
8 publications, 0.4%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.35%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.35%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 7, 0.35%
Norway
7 publications, 0.35%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 0.3%
Qatar
6 publications, 0.3%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 6, 0.3%
Saudi Arabia
6 publications, 0.3%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.25%
Iran
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 0.25%
Finland
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.2%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.2%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 0.15%
Ghana
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.15%
Greece
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 3, 0.15%
Nepal
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.15%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.15%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.1%
Russia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.1%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.1%
UAE
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.1%
Romania
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.1%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.05%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.05%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.05%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.05%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.05%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.05%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.05%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.05%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.05%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Liberia
|
Liberia, 1, 0.05%
Liberia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.05%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.05%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.05%
Oman
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.05%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.05%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.05%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.05%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.05%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.05%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.05%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (37 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
8 profile journal articles
Chew Emily

National Eye Institute
606 publications,
67 193 citations
h-index: 99
2 profile journal articles
Fuller Gerald
58 publications,
498 citations
h-index: 14
2 profile journal articles
Hammer Arthur
15 publications,
414 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Castaldi Elisa
45 publications,
742 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Montecinos-Franjola Felipe
23 publications,
186 citations
h-index: 9