Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.3
SJR
1.520
CiteScore
6.3
Categories
Accounting
Economics and Econometrics
Finance
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Years of issue
1988-2025
journal names
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
J RISK UNCERTAINTY
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(6414 citations)

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
(2568 citations)

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(972 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(63 publications)

University of Pennsylvania
(46 publications)

Erasmus University Rotterdam
(29 publications)

IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
(7 publications)

University of Zurich
(7 publications)

Harvard University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1520
Q3
Oceanographic features in the vicinity of Japaratuba Canyon, Sergipe, Brazil
Domingues E.D., Schettini C.A.
ABSTRACT This study presents an initial assessment of the hydrographic characteristics in the region of the Japaratuba Canyon on the continental shelf of Sergipe, Brazil. An oceanographic campaign was conducted, during which two high spatial resolution transects were made on the north and south sides of the canyon, along with a transverse transect. The results indicate that the hydrographic features are similar to those found on the continental shelf of Pernambuco, with the dominant water mass being Tropical Water. However, it differs in having a much greater influence from Coastal Water, as a result of the dispersion of the São Francisco River plume to the south and from small rivers that discharge into the northern portion of the continental shelf of the state of Sergipe. The near bottom turbidity and chlorophyll were relatively higher in the southern section, what can be an indication that the presence of the canyon can produce a localized upwelling effect, with the canyon playing a role in allowing the approach of water from the top of the nearest permanent thermocline to the coast.
Q3
Global sensitivity analysis in flood mapping using HEC-RAS 2D: effects of the floodplain manning coefficient for a dam-break case
Silva I.T., Santos H.A., Pereira L.C., Nascimento K.S.
ABSTRACT The flood map outputs from hydrodynamic models may contain uncertainties due to inaccuracies in the input parameters. On the other hand, the results of dam break models are crucial for performing risk analyses of potential material and social damage. Thus, this study applied a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to evaluate the effects of the floodplain Manning coefficient on the inundation generated by the hypothetical dam break of a real water dam in HEC-RAS 2D. Three aspects of flood output, the peak discharge, the arrival time and the time of flood damping, were analyzed via variance tests. The Manning coefficient varied from 0.026 to 0.150, resulting in a change of up to 54% in the peak discharge at a distance of 25 km and a delayed arrival time corresponding to 16 minutes in the cross section located 1 km downstream of the dam. However, Manning coefficients between 0.026 and 0.050 show statistically similar results in terms of two aspects (the peak discharge and the arrival time). This study indicated that the GSA and variance tests may contribute to critical analyses of Manning coefficient adoption and help decision-makers develop criteria for planning emergency actions.
Q3
Analysis of the impact of leaks and valve maneuvers on pressure transient data in water distribution networks
Sant’Anna M., Souza R.G., Prudente G., Brentan B., Meirelles G.
ABSTRACT Swift detection and repair of leaks in water distribution networks are essential to ensure the operational efficiency of the system. It’s not viable, both financially and technically, to scour the entire extension of the system to look for leaks, therefore it’s important to narrow down areas prone to leakage. Hydraulic techniques are useful to that end, since hydraulic data can be used to identify anomalies and guide efforts on field campaigns. Among these techniques, those based on the transient state are used to infer about the actual condition of the system by causing controlled disturbances, such as closing a valve, as to reveal anomalies like leaks, deposits or illegal connections. In this paper, the software OpenFlows Hammer, was used to model the transient state and generate the transient state data. This data was then analyzed based on signal theory. The results show that it’s possible to identify the presence of leaks, even minor ones, and their location in relation to the monitoring point. However, further studies are needed to better establish metrics relevant to characterize the behavior of the data in the frequency domain.
Q3
Application of machine learning models in predictive maintenance of Francis hydraulic turbines
Souza J.C., Honorato Júnior O., Tiago Filho G.L., Carpinteiro O.A., Biancardine Júnior H.S., Santos I.F.
ABSTRACT Cavitation is a phenomenon that reduces the useful life of hydraulic machines, taking place in function of the variation of the pressure gradient at a constant temperature. In hydraulic turbines, cavitation occurs when the turbine operates beyond nominal conditions, generating abnormal vibrations, erosion to blades and other key components, thus resulting in stoppage for maintenance. This article proposes a cavitation monitoring system based on the analysis of vibration spectra via two Machine Learning (ML) models: a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network and a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. Drawing upon vibration analysis and pressure coefficient parameter standards, such models are capable of identifying the vibratory state of a given machine, distinguishing its cavitating and non-cavitating states. Moreover, it is proposed that these models may estimate real conditions for turbine functioning, thus enabling planning for the most opportune moment to carry out turbine maintenance. Both ML models were evaluated through a series of experiments with data from a Francis turbine installed in Brazil, where vibration spectra and flow pressure coefficients were monitored; they identified cavitating and non-cavitating states with precision levels between 95% and 100%, thus demonstrating satisfactory performance and serving as an important step in the development of a system for monitoring hydropowers.
Q3
Proposal of resilience indices for water mains subject to hydraulic transients and case study in Franca (Brazil)
Silva J.V., Sierra D.A., Sodek D.B., Martim A.L., Dalfré Filho J.G., Luvizotto Junior E.
ABSTRACT Water main bursts not only lead to financial losses, but also water losses. Climate change and water resources scarcity puts in perspective the need to understand the conditions of the water transportation infrastructure to prevent accidents. The objective of this work is to present resilience indices related to the operation of the water system and infrastructure operational limits to aid decision maker to evaluate risk. The resilience indexes were established based on four indexes arising from transient flows simulation: burst pressure, minimum transient pressure, maximum air volume and resultant forces. Decision making on a complex problem with many parameters based on a simple index is not straightforward, therefore we used a multicriteria decision technique to assist, the simplified three-scale Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To test the proposed method, a case study of a trunk main from the municipality of Franca, Brazil is presented. To calculate the indexes a hydraulic model with transient flows of the referred system was simulated. For the case study, a few scenarios were evaluated. The scenario where no protection devices are present is the most critical.
Q3
A comprehensive reservoir segmentation for hydrodynamics and water quality assessment
Goulart C.B., Carvalho J.M., Bernardo J.W., Polli B.A., Fernandes C., Fuchs S., Bleninger T.
ABSTRACT Reservoirs present different and intrinsic characteristics from the point of view of physical, chemical, and biological nature from other environmental systems. They therefore should be characterized differently for a better representation aiming for proper planning and management strategies. This paper analyzes eleven reservoirs and develops a classification and zonation strategy for those systems. First, temporal variation and statistical analysis are performed, followed by a residence time calculation, to assess the reservoir's dynamics. Next, stratification and spatial variation analysis are proposed to verify their necessity. Three of the reservoirs analyzed behave as lentic systems, with a high residence time. In addition, all three have significant tributaries, indicating the potential necessity of considering spatial variation for their classification, later verified in 3D modeling. Even if every reservoir is unique in its dynamics and characteristics, the classification scheme is suitable for different types of reservoirs, since it works like a decision tree, where input loads and hydrodynamics are considered.
Q3
Modeling a hypersaline lagoon to evaluate salinity changes due to morphology of an ocean connection
Carvalho A.C., Carvalho M.V., Trevisan C.L., Rosman P.C., Wasserman J.C.
ABSTRACT Araruama is a perennial hypersaline lagoon where seawater flows in through a narrow connection and spreads, where it is intensively evaporated. Although the inflow of seawater increases the salts load, a high inflow may reduce flushing time, decreasing salinity. Although reducing flushing time would improve water quality, the accompanying reduction in the salinity may change the ecological equilibrium. In the present research, a numeric hydrodynamic model was applied to Araruama Lagoon, to determine the maximum connection depth that promotes reduction of flushing time, however maintaining salinity. Five scenarios were executed in the hydrodynamic model SisBaHiA© with changing hydraulic area, including channel average depths of 2.5 m, 3.0 m, and 4.0 m. The salinity simulations outlined three segmented sectors, the first associated with the connection channel, but also affecting the proximal portion of the lagoon; the second is an intense evaporation area, with high salinity values, and the third, in the western portion of the lagoon where freshwater inputs can affect salinity. The tested channel bathymetry scenarios promoted a salinity increase with a channel depth of 3.0 meters. With a connection channel depth of 4.0 meters (highest hydraulic area), the threshold limit is attained, and salinities are reduced in the lagoon.
Q3
Multi-model ensemble for long-term statistical trend analysis of observed gridded precipitation and temperature data in the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil
Vasco G., Miranda R.D., Viana J.F., Bressiani D., Mendiondo E.M., Silva R.M., Galvíncio J.D., Silva S.F., Montenegro S.M.
ABSTRACT For effective management practices and decision-making, the uncertainties associated with regional climate models (RCMs) and their scenarios need to be assessed in the context of climate change. This study analyzes long-term trends in precipitation and temperature data sets (maximum and minimum values) from the NASA, Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Prediction (NEX-GDDP), under the São Francisco River Basin Representative Concentration Path (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5, using the REA (Reliable Ensemble Average) method. In each grid, the built multi-model was bias-corrected using the CMhyd software for annual, dry, wet, and pre-season periods – for historical (1961-2005) and future (2006-2100) periods. The multi-model and four different methods, namely: The Mann-Kendall, Mann-Kendall pre-brightening test, bias-corrected pre-brightening, and Spearman correlation, were used to detect trends in precipitation, and minimum and maximum temperature. In the analysis of precipitation and temperature metrics, the results for the NRMSD showed that, in general, the CSIRO model presented more satisfactory results in all physiographic regions. Person's correlation coefficient showed a better adjustment of precipitation for the MIROC5, EC.EARTH and NORESMI1 models, in areas of sub-medium and upper São Francisco. For the minimum temperature, the CSIRO and NORESMI1 models showed the best fit, in general. At maximum temperature, the EC.EARTH and CSIRO models showed more satisfactory results. With regard to trend analysis, the results indicated an increasing trend in mean annual temperature and precipitation across the basin. When analyzed by subregion, the results show an increasing trend in monthly average minimum and maximum temperatures in the middle and lower SFRB, while average monthly rainfall increases during the rainy season and preseason in Upper São Francisco. The results of this research can be used by government entities, such as Civil Defense, to subsidize decision-making that requires actions/measures to relocate people/communities to less risky locations to minimize risk or vulnerability situations for the population living nearby to the river.
Q3
Thresholds of human body stability in water flows: advances, challenges, and guidelines for flood risk management
Fagundes M.R., Fan F.M., Michel G.P., Kobiyama M., Vanelli F.M., Monteiro L.R., Campagnolo K., Loss J.F., Abatti B.H.
ABSTRACT The occurrence of floods causes hundreds of drowning deaths annually. Therefore, it is necessary to develop measures and risk management policies related to flood disasters. One approach is the definition of stability thresholds for individuals in water flows, as safety is compromised when people are exposed to flows that surpass their ability to stand or cross. Based on these considerations, the objective of the study was to conduct a literature review of experimental, empirical, and theoretical studies on this topic, evaluating stability thresholds for individuals exposed to water flow. In total, 34 studies conducted until the year 2023 were identified. Key factors influencing stability include water flow characteristics and the physical attributes of individuals. In addition to these factors, adverse conditions such as uneven terrain, poor lighting, and psychological factors were also considered important. However, it was noted that few studies have assessed such adverse conditions, and there is a gap in the experimental analysis of these variables. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of conducting more physical experiments to address these gaps, obtain a more comprehensive database, and improve precision in numerical and experimental models, ultimately supporting tools for flood risk management.
Q3
Comparison of evolutionary algorithms applied to optimal design of water distribution networks
Muranaka R.S., Rangel J.S., Marotta M.A., Soares A.K.
ABSTRACT The pursuit of efficient water distribution network (WDN) projects that reflect the complexities of real systems has spurred the development and application of various optimization techniques. Among these, multi and many-objective optimization hold particular significance due to the intrinsic interplay between variables within water distribution networks. Within this domain, evolutionary algorithms have emerged as a promising optimization option, offering a range of methodologies documented in the literature. To systematically evaluate these approaches, a methodology was devised to compare six evolutionary algorithms in the context of water distribution networks optimization: NSGA-II, NSGA-III, U-NSGA-III, R-NSGA-III, MOEA/D, and RVEA, using two distinct objective functions. The comparative analysis utilized as key metrics the efficiency criteria (E), cumulative distribution function (CDF), error statistics and algorithm complexity. The findings revealed that while most algorithms successfully converged to the known global optimum of the employed case study, NSGA-II and NSGA-III exhibited superior performance, notably in minimizing costs. These results demonstrate the efficacy of these algorithms in tackling the complexities inherent in water distribution networks optimization, positioning them as leading contenders in this field.
Q3
Dynamics of the water infiltration process in permeable pavement using in situ experimentation and numerical simulation with hydrus-2D
Costa I.R., Santos Neto S.M., Antonino A.C., Montenegro S.M., Coutinho A.P.
ABSTRACT This work presents a two-dimensional simulation of infiltration dynamics in a real permeable pavement (PP) structure in the city of Recife, representing more realistically the geometry of the infiltration bulb and the dynamics of water redistribution processes in the PP. Sixteen infiltration tests were carried out on the PP using the Beerkan method. The hydrodynamic parameters of the PP surface were determined by applying the inverse method to the infiltration data. Simulations of water transfer processes were carried out with Hydrus-2D using the hydrodynamic properties corresponding to the highest and lowest saturated hydraulic conductivity observed on the surface. Satisfactory infiltration characteristics were observed in the PP. The inverse method showed good adjustment capacity to the accumulated infiltration curves and estimation of hydrodynamic properties. Simulations using Hydrus-2D demonstrated that the infiltration process and water redistribution in the subgrade depend on the hydrodynamic properties of the coating.
Q3
Flow measurements with ADCP on the Guaíba River, during the highest water level recorded in history - May 2024 (floods in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)
Andrade M.M., Piazera M., Luz R.D., Nunes J.C., Scottá F., Silva T.
ABSTRACT This Technical Note aims to present data from in-situ measurements conducted with Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) under the highest level recorded in the Guaíba River. Flow measurements carried out on May 5th and 6th, with water levels of 5.27 and 5.25 m, resulted in average values of 30,180 and 29,852 m3/s, respectively. The profiles with the river flow are presented, as well as the water level readings at the Usina do Gasômetro gauges. These data can be accessed on a open platform, can contributes to the understanding of the Guaíba's hydrodynamics and the flooding at Patos Lagoon and can provide valuable information for modeling maximum flow scenarios in these systems.
Q3
Effects of applied water depth and soil water storage uniformity on irrigation quality and crop yield
Gonçalves A.C., Rezende R., Camargo A.P., Frizzone J.A., Folegatti M.V., Wenneck G.S.
ABSTRACT The quality of water distribution and the coefficients that express water use efficiency are evaluated from the distribution of the irrigation depth (I). However, a hypothesis has been proposed that it may be more effective to base these analyses on the water depth stored in the soil profile (H), after irrigation. To evaluate this hypothesis, in a very clayey soil, bean was cultivated under irrigation by conventional sprinkling, with four scenarios of water application uniformity. During the crop cycle, irrigations were carried out, scheduled according to a lower limit of soil-water potential. The four scenarios were associated with 64, 144, 192 and 256 experimental points, which were characterized as having excellent (S1), adequate (S2), inadequate (S3) and unacceptable (S4) uniformity, according to obtained values of Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CUC) and distribution uniformity coefficient (DUC). At the end of the cycle, harvest was carried out in each grid, obtaining the crop yield. The uniformity of water distribution in the soil negatively impact crop yield only in S4, with an unacceptable water application pattern. The irrigation quality analysis based on values of H is more consistent with the results observed for the crop than the analysis based on the applied water depth.
Q3
Chemical and isotopic changes in surface and underground waters in a Watershed in the Central Amazon
Bastos A.S., Ferreira S.J., Gastmans D., Freitas E.P., Brito A.P., Almeida C.N., Duvoisin Junior S.
ABSTRACT Environmental monitoring of water is essential for efficient management of water source conservation in river basins. However, there is a lack of studies with this synergy applying unconventional techniques. We evaluated chemical characteristics of surface and underground waters (2021-2022), including for the first time the analysis of the isotopic composition of waters collected from water sources throughout Educandos`s Basin, in the city of Manaus-AM/Brazil, to evaluate chemical-isotopic changes in the view of anthropogenic impacts. Statistical analyzes were used to compare means, graphical analyzes and Principal Component Analysis to identify the main patterns of the data sets. Our results demonstrated a significant increase in pH, electrical conductivity and an increased in nitrates in polluted groundwater and reduced DO in contaminated surface waters. Furthermore, the isotopic signature did not indicate pollution through changes in the isotopic composition of natural and polluted waters, however, it showed more depleted signatures in one of the underground monitoring wells, indicating an impact site vulnerable to the interaction of aquifer waters with Rio Negro and Igarapé. When analyzing chemical parameters with isotopic composition, it can be allowed a better understanding of the mechanisms of circulation and mineralization of underground and surface waters in the Urban Hydrographic Basin.
Q3
A new Integrated Water Quality Index (IWQI) and your application with emergent pollutants in the Atlantic Forest biome basin in southern Brazil
Alves T.C., Jenske G., Cardozo A., Pinheiro A.
ABSTRACT The presence of emerging contaminants in surface water is a growing concern, as these substances are not typically monitored by environmental quality systems, potentially leading to the consumption of contaminated water. In this study, the presence of caffeine, an emerging contaminant that is ingested solely by humans and is present in surface water due to its chemical characteristics, was investigated as a potential indicator of anthropogenic contamination in the Itajaí-Açu River in the southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. Additionally, twelve other emerging pollutants were examined in the Itajaí-Açu River, including estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), ethinylestradiol (EE2), estriol (E3), prednisone (PD), hexestrol (HEX), acetaminophen (ACM), Oxytetracicline (OC). Surface water samples were collected over five months and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The results revealed that caffeine was present in 84% of the analyzed samples, and emerging pollutants were present in all monitored municipalities. The study also investigated the relationship between an integrated water quality index, the magnitudes and occurrences of caffeine, and land use. The emerging pollutants Estrone, Ethinylestradiol, Hexestrol, Naproxen and Oxytetracycline were not detected in the analyzed samples. However, Ibuprofen, Tetracycline, Prednisone, and Acetaminophen were present in 44% and 36% of the samples, respectively, with Estriol, Ketoprofen, and Estradiol having a lower occurrence. The mean concentrations of Estradiol, Estriol, Ketoprofen, Acetaminophen, and Ibuprofen were 0.08 µg L-1, 0.23 µg L-1, 0.15 µg L-1, 0.42 µg L-1, and 0.44 µg L-1, respectively, and were higher than previously reported. The concentration range of caffeine during the study was <0.10 to 1.48 µg L-1, with the mean concentration being 0.30 µg L-1. These findings highlight the presence of emerging pollutants in the Itajaí-Açu River and the need for continued monitoring and regulatory legislation to protect surface water quality in Brazil.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
6414 citations, 10.74%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
2568 citations, 4.3%
|
|
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
972 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Theory and Decision
874 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Management Science
767 citations, 1.28%
|
|
Risk Analysis
632 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Journal of Economic Psychology
570 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
424 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
414 citations, 0.69%
|
|
PLoS ONE
406 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
405 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Environmental and Resource Economics
400 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Health Economics
389 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Insurance
350 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Experimental Economics
350 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Judgment and Decision Making
328 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
326 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Ecological Economics
319 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Health Economics (United Kingdom)
296 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
284 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
281 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Economics Letters
270 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
239 citations, 0.4%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
236 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Accident Analysis and Prevention
221 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Economic Theory
202 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Games and Economic Behavior
201 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Economics
194 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Economic Review
193 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice
189 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Sustainability
188 citations, 0.31%
|
|
GENEVA Risk and Insurance Review
183 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
181 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Economic Theory
158 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
153 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Risk Research
152 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
139 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Economic Review
135 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Applied Economics
127 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Medical Decision Making
127 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral Finance
124 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
119 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
115 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
110 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Scientific Reports
109 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Economic Journal
109 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Resources and Energy Economics
106 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Decision Analysis
103 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Economic Inquiry
100 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Banking and Finance
98 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
91 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Mathematical Social Sciences
89 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Risk Management and Insurance Review
88 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
88 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Research
87 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
86 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Public Economics
80 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Review of Economics and Statistics
79 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Energy Policy
76 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Natural Hazards
73 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annals of Operations Research
72 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Climatic Change
72 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Research
71 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Journal of Health Economics
71 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Value in Health
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Journal of Socio-Economics
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Political Economy
62 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Economic Literature
61 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Psychological Science
59 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Information Sciences
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Southern Economic Journal
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
54 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Health Policy
52 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
52 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
51 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
51 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Economic Surveys
51 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Psychology
50 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
50 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PharmacoEconomics
49 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Safety Science
48 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cognition
47 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Risks
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annual Review of Resource Economics
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Series in Operations Research and Management Science
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Applied Economics Letters
46 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Automobile Insurance
44 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Managerial and Decision Economics
43 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cognitive Psychology
42 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of the European Economic Association
42 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Economic Review
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bulletin of Economic Research
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Economic Modelling
40 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
|
|
Elsevier
14168 citations, 23.73%
|
|
Springer Nature
10508 citations, 17.6%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
6198 citations, 10.38%
|
|
Wiley
6099 citations, 10.21%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3023 citations, 5.06%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2713 citations, 4.54%
|
|
SAGE
1645 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1372 citations, 2.3%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
1200 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Emerald
1108 citations, 1.86%
|
|
MDPI
975 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
717 citations, 1.2%
|
|
American Economic Association
537 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
499 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
488 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
360 citations, 0.6%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
356 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Annual Reviews
256 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
192 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IGI Global
184 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
176 citations, 0.29%
|
|
World Scientific
164 citations, 0.27%
|
|
CAIRN
142 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
138 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
137 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Marketing Association
127 citations, 0.21%
|
|
MIT Press
121 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
118 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
108 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
92 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMJ
92 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Academy of Management
85 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Econometric Society
79 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Royal Society
75 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
74 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IOS Press
63 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOP Publishing
48 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Accounting Association
47 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
36 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
35 citations, 0.06%
|
|
PERSEE Program
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
32 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Sirey
27 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cornell University Press
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
19 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
JMIR Publications
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
White Horse Press
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Public Health Association
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
14 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Duncker & Humblot GmbH
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Now Publishers
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
With Intelligence LLC
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society of Insurance Science
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASME International
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Guilford Publications
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Monetary Fund
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OpenEdition
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
8 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
PeerJ
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Real Estate Society
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IWA Publishing
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
AOSIS
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
6 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Tax Association
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Harvard University
63 publications, 6.51%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
46 publications, 4.75%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
29 publications, 3%
|
|
University of Chicago
27 publications, 2.79%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
22 publications, 2.27%
|
|
University of York
21 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Duke University
20 publications, 2.07%
|
|
Newcastle University
19 publications, 1.96%
|
|
University of Zurich
18 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
18 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Tilburg University
18 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Stanford University
16 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
16 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
16 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Texas A&M University
16 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Kiel University
15 publications, 1.55%
|
|
University of Cambridge
14 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
14 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Australian National University
13 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of East Anglia
13 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Warwick
12 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
12 publications, 1.24%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
12 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
11 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
11 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Columbia University
11 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Ohio State University
11 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Michigan State University
10 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Syracuse University
10 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
10 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Lund University
9 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
9 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Georgia State University
9 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Tinbergen Institute
9 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University College London
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Maastricht University
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Nottingham
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Arizona
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Michigan
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Tulane University
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
8 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Princeton University
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Leiden University
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
7 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
ETH Zurich
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National University of Singapore
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Birmingham
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Cologne
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Mannheim
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Vienna
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Kentucky
6 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Heidelberg University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bologna
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Southern California
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Virginia Tech
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tufts University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Temple University
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Alabama
5 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Lausanne
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Durham University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Monash University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
North Carolina State University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Colorado State University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Reading
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Université de Lille
4 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Linköping University
3 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Örebro University
3 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Karlstad University
3 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
3 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
University of Zurich
7 publications, 5.56%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
7 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 3.97%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
5 publications, 3.97%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 3.97%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
University of Chicago
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Georgia State University
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Kiel University
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 2.38%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Lausanne
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Australian National University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Duke University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
San Diego State University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Newcastle University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Cologne
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Tilburg University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Osnabrück University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Tinbergen Institute
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Murcia
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Alabama
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of York
2 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Örebro University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Wuhan University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Durham University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Shanghai International Studies University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Hanken School of Economics
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
City, University of London
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Verona
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
United International College
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
National Taiwan University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
National Central University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Charles University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Adelaide
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Cape Town
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
West Virginia University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
University of California, Davis
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
DePaul University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Shandong University
1 publication, 0.79%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
USA
|
USA, 553, 57.13%
USA
553 publications, 57.13%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 139, 14.36%
United Kingdom
139 publications, 14.36%
|
France
|
France, 86, 8.88%
France
86 publications, 8.88%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 85, 8.78%
Germany
85 publications, 8.78%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 80, 8.26%
Netherlands
80 publications, 8.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 38, 3.93%
Italy
38 publications, 3.93%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 32, 3.31%
Australia
32 publications, 3.31%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 32, 3.31%
Switzerland
32 publications, 3.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 32, 3.31%
Sweden
32 publications, 3.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 30, 3.1%
Canada
30 publications, 3.1%
|
China
|
China, 25, 2.58%
China
25 publications, 2.58%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 19, 1.96%
Israel
19 publications, 1.96%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 17, 1.76%
Austria
17 publications, 1.76%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 17, 1.76%
Spain
17 publications, 1.76%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 1.34%
Belgium
13 publications, 1.34%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 10, 1.03%
Singapore
10 publications, 1.03%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 1.03%
South Africa
10 publications, 1.03%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 9, 0.93%
Denmark
9 publications, 0.93%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 8, 0.83%
Japan
8 publications, 0.83%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.41%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.41%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.41%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.41%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.31%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.31%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.31%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.31%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.31%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.31%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.31%
Finland
3 publications, 0.31%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.21%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.21%
Greece
2 publications, 0.21%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.21%
India
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.21%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.21%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.21%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.21%
Norway
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.21%
Poland
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.21%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.21%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.21%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.1%
Russia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.1%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.1%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.1%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.1%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.1%
|
Show all (9 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 58, 46.03%
USA
58 publications, 46.03%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 23, 18.25%
Germany
23 publications, 18.25%
|
France
|
France, 17, 13.49%
France
17 publications, 13.49%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 12.7%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 12.7%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 12, 9.52%
Netherlands
12 publications, 9.52%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 8.73%
Switzerland
11 publications, 8.73%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 9, 7.14%
Australia
9 publications, 7.14%
|
China
|
China, 6, 4.76%
China
6 publications, 4.76%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 4.76%
Italy
6 publications, 4.76%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 3.97%
Austria
5 publications, 3.97%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 3.17%
Sweden
4 publications, 3.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 3.17%
South Africa
4 publications, 3.17%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 2.38%
Denmark
3 publications, 2.38%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 2.38%
Spain
3 publications, 2.38%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 2.38%
Japan
3 publications, 2.38%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 1.59%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 1.59%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 1.59%
Singapore
2 publications, 1.59%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.79%
India
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.79%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.79%
Canada
1 publication, 0.79%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.79%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.79%
Poland
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.79%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.79%
Finland
1 publication, 0.79%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.79%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.79%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
|