Open Access
Management Science

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
ISSN:
00251909, 15265501
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4.6
SJR
5.438
CiteScore
8.8
Categories
Management Science and Operations Research
Strategy and Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Decision Sciences
Years of issue
1969-2025
journal names
Management Science
MANAGE SCI
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(65005 citations)

European Journal of Operational Research
(28221 citations)

Management Science
(21411 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Pennsylvania
(489 publications)

Stanford University
(470 publications)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(430 publications)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(105 publications)

Harvard University
(88 publications)

University of Pennsylvania
(86 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1369
Q1

Cosimulation-based biomechanics of the human body with hip prosthesis
Di Bona R., Catelani D., Ottaviano E., Gentile D., Testa G.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Correction to: A new skeletal model for the ankle joint complex
Rodrigues da Silva M., Marques F., Tavares da Silva M., Flores P.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A symplectic finite element method in time for periodic response of multibody systems
Wang H., Wang C., Wang G., Pan Y., Mikkola A., Peng H.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Investigation of the dynamic transmission accuracy of an industrial robot joint RV reducer under variable situations
Xu L., Wu Y.
The dynamic transmission error of the joint RV (rotating vector) reducer is one of the important factors affecting the positioning accuracy of industrial robots. However, the current studies on the transmission accuracy characteristics of RV reducers are based on the equal speed driving condition, which neglects the impact of the transmission error generated by the joint RV reducer on the positioning accuracy when the robot is in the start-stop variable speed phase. This study carries out an in-depth analysis of the dynamic transmission accuracy characteristics of joint RV reducers of industrial robots under variable-speed working conditions. Two typical mathematical models of variable-speed drive laws are constructed, and a multibody dynamic model of the RV reducer that takes into account the geometric errors of typical components is established, aiming to more accurately simulate the operating state of the RV reducer under actual working conditions. To confirm the accuracy of the theoretical RV reducer contact dynamics model, the dynamic transmission error test of the RV reducer under equal-speed conditions is carried out. The results show that the dynamic model can better reflect the actual transmission characteristics of the RV reducer. Thereafter, based on the theoretical model, the effects of different driving laws on the dynamic transmission error of joint RV reducers are analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that the transmission error of the RV reducer under variable speed drive is significantly larger than that under equal speed drive. Moreover, angular acceleration and load inertia are the main factors affecting the transmission error of RV reducers for industrial robot joints.
Q1

Muscle path predictions using a discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange model in constrained optimisation: comparison with OpenSim and experimental data
Lavaill M., Chen X., Heinrich S., Pivonka P., Leyendecker S.
Abstract
Accurate and robust modelling of muscle paths is crucial for predicting human movement. Traditional methods often rely on simplified straight-line representations and manual specifications of via-points and wrapping surfaces, which may lead to inconsistent and unrealistic muscle paths The discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange (DGEL) method identifies geodesics with minimal curvature trajectories that adhere closely to anatomical constraints. Embedding DGEL into an optimisation problem with a specific objective function has the potential to identify muscle paths with smooth changes in muscle length over the course of the motion, thereby avoiding abrupt muscle discontinuities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the DGEL method. We developed multibody models with increasing complexity (i.e. a static arm model, a kinematic elbow model and a kinematic shoulder model) and investigated different scenarios, such as muscle attachment modifications, simulation of diverse motions and extreme ranges of motion. We performed a comparative analysis between the geodesic model and the open-source OpenSim framework, with validation against experimental data to assess physiological plausibility. Our findings reveal that the DGEL method overcomes limitations inherent in traditional approaches, including discontinuities and incorrect wrapping surface interactions. For the static arm model, the DGEL-computed muscle length showed a closer match to ground truth compared to OpenSim. In the elbow model, the DGEL method eliminated unphysiological muscle path discontinuities. In the shoulder model, the DGEL method was validated across three different motions against experimental muscle moment arms, achieving great accuracy and superior robustness in handling complex muscle paths. This method effectively addressed common pitfalls in muscle path modelling, such as bone penetrations and erratic trajectories. Future work will further validate the DGEL method across diverse real-world applications and optimise its performance through advanced objective functions. The DGEL approach represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and robustness of muscle path modelling, advancing the field of biomechanics and musculoskeletal modelling.
Q1

Dynamic responses of a vibro-impact capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine via multibody dynamics
Wang Z., Tian J., Liu Y., Neves A., Prasad S.
Abstract
In recent years, colonic capsule endoscopy has become available in clinical practice as an alternative modality to colonoscopy. However, it faces challenges such as prolonged examination time and the absence of clinician navigation. Leveraging their pioneering work in the field of vibro-impact self-propulsion technique for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Zhang et al. (IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8:1842–1849, 2023) developed a novel, untethered, self-propelled, endoscopic capsule robot, with the aim of providing a new means of examining bowel cancer in real time. To evaluate and optimize the passage of this capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine, this work adopts multibody dynamics analysis and experimental investigation to study the robot’s dynamics and its interaction with the intestinal environment. Considering the complex anatomy of the large intestine, containing different sections, e.g., cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and variations of the haustra, e.g., with various radii, lengths, and heights, the robot was driven by the square-wave excitation of an inner mass interacting with the capsule body and tested on a real porcine colon. The robot’s driving parameters, including the excitation frequency, amplitude, and duty cycle, and the dimensions of the haustra are the two main factors influencing the robot’s progression in the intestine. By comparing with the experimental results, the proposed multibody dynamics model developed using MSC Adams can estimate the movement of the capsule robot and the intestinal resistance quantitatively. Extensive numerical and experimental studies suggest an excitation frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 0.4 as the optimal parameters for driving the robot, and the longer the haustral length is, the faster the robot passes through. These results ensure the validity of the proposed multibody dynamics platform, which can be used by robotic engineers for developing medical robots for intestinal examinations.
Q1

Fluid-conveying pipes in the floating frame of reference formulation
van Voorthuizen K., Abdul Rasheed M.I., Schilder J.
Abstract
This work presents a new formulation for flexible fluid-conveying pipe elements based on the widely used floating frame of reference formulation. The elements can be used as a tool for the analysis of flexible multibody systems that contain fluid-conveying pipes, as it is well known that the movement of the fluid can influence the behavior and stability of such systems. The pipe defines a control volume through which the fluid, which is considered to be a moving mass, axially flows. The velocity of a material point of the fluid is therefore a material derivative of its position, representing the large rigid movement and small elastic deformation of the pipe along with the velocity of the fluid with respect to the pipe. The equations of motion are derived through the principle of virtual work, spatial discretization by finite element interpolation functions, and model reduction. A simplification of the consistent equations of motion is proposed, which avoids the use of inertia shape integrals and reduces the effort required to implement the developed fluid-conveying pipe elements in existing multibody software. The developed elements are validated by simulation of a straight cantilevered pipe and a curved pipe constrained on one end by a hinge. A simulation of a concrete printing system illustrates the straightforward incorporation of the elements in larger multibody systems.
Q1

Dynamic modeling and simulation of the multi-point collision and contact problem of multi-legged robots
Ma X., Zhao S., An Y., Li K., Wang T.
The problem of multi-point collision and contact in multi-legged robots involves complex dynamics with multiple closed loops, variable topology, and numerous contact points, making simulations challenging. Additionally, Zeno behavior—characterized by an infinite number of discrete transitions within a finite time—is likely to occur, reducing computational efficiency and potentially causing simulations to stall. This paper establishes a linear complementary dynamic model to study the collision and contact problem of multi-legged mobile robots. For the uncertainty of multi-point collision and contact, we use sets and transformation matrices to represent the number and position changes of the points that collide or contact with the ground. This paper separately studies the problems of multi-point collision and multi-point continuous contact and considers the coupling effect of collision and continuous contact. A new criterion to determine the state of continuous contact is proposed, and modifications are made to the relevant linear complementary equations to prevent the Zeno behavior. Finally, several numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Q1

Vibration isolation performance and non-probabilistic reliability evaluation of multidimensional vibration isolator with interval joint clearance
Gao X., Niu J., He L., Wang Z., Qin Z., Wu H.
For suppressing multidimensional vibration effectively, the multidimensional vibration isolator based on parallel mechanism considering interval joint clearance is proposed. The kinematics and dynamics of the isolator are established respectively. The contact force generated due to interval joint clearance is modeled respectively by the Lankarani–Nikravesh (L-N) model and the modified Coulomb friction force model. Furthermore, the dynamics of the isolator with interval joint clearance are obtained by the first order interval perturbation method. The upper and lower bounds of vibration isolation performance are calculated, which indicates the isolator with interval joint clearance inhibited external vibration in time and frequency domain respectively. The vibration isolation performance is most sensitive in pitch (around $x$ ) direction due to the existence of interval joint clearance. The non-probabilistic reliability model of the isolator is proposed by the shortest distance method, and the non-probabilistic reliability index is investigated in each isolation direction with interval joint clearance. The reliability index of the isolator exhibits a quasi-stable area in horizontal (in $x$ ) and pitch (around $x$ ) directions, which implies the reliability index is not sensitive to joint clearance variation in a certain perturbation range. The proposed vibration isolator with interval joint clearance is fabricated, and the vibration isolation experiment is conducted. The experimental results are generally consistent with the theoretical results, which indicates the correctness of the analysis.
Q1

Using high fidelity discrete element simulation to calibrate an expeditious terramechanics model in a multibody dynamics framework
Zhang Y., Dai J., Hu W., Negrut D.
The wheel–soil interaction has great impact on the dynamics of off-road vehicles in terramechanics applications. The soil contact model (SCM), which anchors an empirical method to characterize the frictional contact between a wheel and soil, has been widely used in off-road vehicle dynamics simulations because it quickly produces adequate results for many terramechanics applications. The SCM approach calls for a set of model parameters that are obtained via a bevameter test. This test is expensive and time consuming to carry out, and in some cases difficult to set up, e.g., in extraterrestrial applications. We propose an approach to address these concerns by conducting the bevameter test in simulation, using a model that captures the physics of the actual experiment with high fidelity. To that end, we model the bevameter test rig as a multibody system, while the dynamics of the soil is captured using a discrete element model (DEM). The multibody dynamics–soil dynamics co-simulation is used to replicate the bevameter test, producing high fidelity ground truth test data that is subsequently used to calibrate the SCM parameters within a Bayesian inference framework. To test the accuracy of the resulting SCM terramechanics, we run single wheel and full rover simulations using both DEM and SCM terrains. The SCM results match well with those produced by the DEM solution, and the simulation time for SCM is two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of DEM. All simulations in this work are performed using Chrono, an open-source, publicly available simulator. The scripts and models used are available in a public repository for reproducibility studies and further research.
Q1

A machine learning approach to simulate flexible body dynamics
Slimak T., Zwölfer A., Todorov B., Rixen D.
Abstract
Flexible body dynamics simulations are powerful tools to realistically analyze vehicles, machines, mechanics, etc. However, the inherently nonlinear governing equations often require tailor-made and computationally expense solution strategies. Employing artificial neural networks for forward dynamics analyses of flexible bodies may be not only useful as a model reduction tool, since evaluating a network is frequently faster compared to solving physics-based models, but also to enhance models with experimental data. In this realm four primary strategies have emerged: (i) Incorporating time as an input to the artificial neural network to predict the desired solution variables at that specific time. (ii) Utilizing an entire time series as input, the network generates the corresponding time series of the desired solution variables in a single pass through the artificial neural network. (iii) Employing an artificial neural network to advance one time step into the future using the states as input. (iv) Leveraging the artificial neural network solely for learning the equations of motion or energetic quantities, e.g., Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, coupled with standard techniques from analytical dynamics and time integration. Approaches (iii) and (iv) can be considered advantageous owing to their inherent physics-informed nature, greater flexibility in adopting varying time steps, and ease of integration with classical simulation techniques. This contribution, therefore, presents a method to predict flexible body dynamics one step at a time using two complimentary artificial neural networks. One network predicts the equations of motion relationship between positions, velocities, and accelerations, while a second network or numerical integrator propagates the system states forwards in time. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the developed approach on the testcase of a flexible beam. Various parameter studies and alternative solutions are presented to highlight the performance of the developed approach. The robustness and ability to extrapolate are also explored to determine the practical viability of this solution. The intention of this single-body work is to enable the future embedding in a multibody context.
Q1

Embedding reference dynamics in model predictive control for trajectory tracking of multi-input multi-output non-minimum phase underactuated multibody systems
Bettega J., Richiedei D., Tamellin I.
This paper proposes a feedback control technique for path and trajectory tracking on multi-input, multi-output nonminimum phase underactuated multibody systems and applies it to a spatial gantry crane moving a double pendulum. The two links forming the double pendulum are connected in series and the desired output of the system is the tip of the second link. This output selection yields to a nonminimum phase system, which is a class of dynamical systems that are particularly challenging from the control design perspective. In this paper, an enhanced formulation of Model Predictive Control is proposed to solve the output trajectory tracking problem by embedding the dynamics of the spatial reference trajectory within the optimization process performed at each time step. The proposed control technique is formulated considering two different scenarios: the case of torque-controlled (i.e., current-controlled) actuators, and the case of position-controlled actuators. The latter is unusual in the field of MPC and is suitable for industrial applications where proprietary controllers are adopted. Numerical validations show negligible contour and tracking errors during the execution of the desired trajectories, with low computational effort.
Q1

Optimising a driving mechanism mechanical design of EXOTIC exoskeleton—a review on upper limb exoskeletons driving systems and a case study
Falkowski P., Mohammadi M., Andreasen Struijk L.N., Rzymkowski C., Pilat Z.
AbstractWhile designing rehabilitation exoskeletons is often realised based on experience and intuition, many processes can be computer-aided. This gives the opportunity to design lighter and more compact constructions. Hence, the devices can be fully wearable and have a wider range of motion. So far, mainly topology optimisation and parametric dimensional optimisations have been used for that. The presented study addresses the problem of automatic selection of the driving systems for exoskeletons. It consists of the literature review of the components used to actuate the joints of such constructions, optimisation algorithm development, and a case study on the EXOTIC exoskeleton. The method includes building a database of motors and gearboxes, computing inverse kinematics of a system to obtain angular trajectories from the task-oriented paths, iteration computing inverse dynamics to compute required torque and the search for the optimal solution according to the defined goal function. This approach enables single joint and multijoint optimisation, with the custom goal function minimising optionally masses, diameters or widths of the selected driving systems. The investigation consists of the 28 simulation trials for EXOTIC exoskeleton to compare results obtained for different aims. Moreover, to visualise the effect, the 1st DOF driving mechanism is redesigned to obtain its minimum width based on the optimisation results. The optimal choice reduced the actuation mechanism mass by 15.3%, while its total dimensions by 17.5%, 8.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The presented approach is easily transferable to any other active exoskeleton and can contribute to designing compact and lightweight constructions. This is particularly important in assistive rehabilitation and can also be used in industrial assistance processes.
Q1

Tailored gait-pattern generation and verification based on the dynamic analysis of the human musculoskeletal model
Shanmuga Prasad S., Kim Y.
This study presents a novel Forward Dynamic approach that integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to generate and optimize gait patterns with Inverse Dynamics analysis, tailored to individual users in the robot-assisted training platform. The resulting trajectories provide gait-trajectory planning using the developed gait-pattern simulator, enabling medical personnel to select customized tasks and training trajectories for users based on their training goals, subsequently transferring user-specific parameters to the exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation/training. By leveraging biomechanical data as reference (joint torque and force) from the Inverse Dynamic analysis, the method foregoes the necessity for experimental data, directly predicting joint angles and positions. To ensure the validity of the proposed method, we used a combined approach of numerical analysis and comparison with motion-capture data. This evaluation aimed to assess how closely the simulated results resembled real human walking motion for the lower-extremity joints.
Q1

Multi-physics tribo-dynamics simulation of lubricated translational joints in marine engines
Li R., Li G., Meng X., Sun R., Cheng W.
Lubricated translational joints are extensively utilized in power equipment. Due to the presence of clearance, the moving mass exhibits transverse motion within the guide rail in addition to its reciprocating motion. This transverse motion significantly influences the friction, wear, and service life of the friction pair. In this process, multi-physics factors such as fluid lubrication, structural deformation, and frictional heat generation interact with each other, making the tribo-dynamics characteristics very complex. In the current study, a new thermal-fluid-solid coupled method for modeling the tribo-dynamics of translational lubricated joints is presented, and it is applied to the crosshead slider-guide friction pair in marine engines. Research results show that the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the slider predicted by the model is consistent with the experimental ones, the correctness of the model is verified. The frictional heat generation has little effect on the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the crosshead slider under the rated operating conditions. However, the structure deformation induced by the external load intensifies the transverse motion of the crosshead slider. Compared with the model that ignored the deformation, the transverse displacement can be increased by 30%, which indicates that it is necessary to consider the multi-physics coupling effect.
Top-100
Citing journals
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
65005 citations, 7.62%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
28221 citations, 3.31%
|
|
Management Science
21411 citations, 2.51%
|
|
International Journal of Production Economics
12744 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Production and Operations Management
12672 citations, 1.48%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
10370 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
8145 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Operations Research
7007 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
6715 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Strategic Management Journal
6134 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Sustainability
5773 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Annals of Operations Research
5651 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Computers and Operations Research
5647 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Omega
5532 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Decision Sciences
4742 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
4707 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
4613 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Information Systems Research
4203 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Organization Science
4178 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Research Policy
4075 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Operations Management
3996 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Naval Research Logistics
3660 citations, 0.43%
|
|
IIE Transactions
3531 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
3348 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Series in Operations Research and Management Science
3300 citations, 0.39%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
3205 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Decision Support Systems
3199 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of the Operational Research Society
3148 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
2843 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Marketing Science
2733 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Information and Management
2567 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Management
2271 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Research
2270 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
2254 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
2239 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
2186 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
2178 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Academy of Management Journal
2178 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Operations Research Letters
1872 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Product Innovation Management
1713 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Banking and Finance
1704 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Marketing
1627 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
1569 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Transactions in Operational Research
1568 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Management Information Systems
1531 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Technovation
1474 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Managerial and Decision Economics
1444 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
1371 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Mathematical Programming
1359 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Corporate Finance
1303 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Review of Financial Analysis
1299 citations, 0.15%
|
|
INFORMS Journal on Computing
1283 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Academy of Management Review
1258 citations, 0.15%
|
|
RAIRO - Operations Research
1215 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Research in Marketing
1202 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
1197 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
1186 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Management Studies
1175 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PLoS ONE
1166 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
1146 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Forecasting
1088 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Industrial Management and Data Systems
1082 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Business Venturing
1056 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
1038 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
1032 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Management Decision
1031 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
1014 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
1011 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Operations-Research-Spektrum
1009 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Finance Research Letters
994 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Access
989 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Technology Transfer
978 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
958 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Naval Research Logistics Quarterly
950 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Small Business Economics
936 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Innovation Management
934 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Knowledge Management
924 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of International Business Studies
903 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice
890 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Production Planning and Control
840 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Industrial and Corporate Change
831 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Transportation
829 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
823 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Financial Economics
812 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
802 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Academy of Management Annals
802 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Decision Analysis
798 citations, 0.09%
|
|
R and D Management
792 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Applied Economics
785 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Theory and Decision
785 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
779 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Applied Mathematical Modelling
770 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
758 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
744 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Long Range Planning
743 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mathematics
729 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Games and Economic Behavior
729 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Energy Economics
726 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Transportation Science
723 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Project Management
722 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
Citing publishers
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
|
|
Elsevier
206076 citations, 24.15%
|
|
Springer Nature
103554 citations, 12.13%
|
|
Wiley
84903 citations, 9.95%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
66148 citations, 7.75%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
61427 citations, 7.2%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
56124 citations, 6.58%
|
|
Emerald
44542 citations, 5.22%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
42916 citations, 5.03%
|
|
SAGE
24449 citations, 2.86%
|
|
MDPI
15721 citations, 1.84%
|
|
IGI Global
11480 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
8671 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Oxford University Press
7505 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
6459 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Academy of Management
5618 citations, 0.66%
|
|
World Scientific
5362 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
4471 citations, 0.52%
|
|
American Marketing Association
2739 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2544 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2073 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1944 citations, 0.23%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1895 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
1688 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1460 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Accounting Association
1388 citations, 0.16%
|
|
CAIRN
1385 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Economic Association
1343 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1054 citations, 0.12%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
941 citations, 0.11%
|
|
JMIR Publications
897 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOP Publishing
876 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SciELO
809 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
804 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cornell University Press
689 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
677 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annual Reviews
643 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
636 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
600 citations, 0.07%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
590 citations, 0.07%
|
|
ASME International
519 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
484 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
401 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
385 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Quality
361 citations, 0.04%
|
|
MIT Press
345 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
312 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
292 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
291 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
279 citations, 0.03%
|
|
OpenEdition
279 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
262 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
262 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Operations Research Society of Japan
258 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
248 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
245 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
245 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
235 citations, 0.03%
|
|
With Intelligence LLC
230 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Royal Society
224 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
218 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
215 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Science Alert
205 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
187 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
183 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AOSIS
181 citations, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
178 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
174 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia de Producao - ABEPRO
174 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Marketing Academy
159 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
157 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
134 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
121 citations, 0.01%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
121 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Econometric Society
121 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
119 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
118 citations, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
116 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IAE School of Management Montpellier University
112 citations, 0.01%
|
|
110 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
101 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
101 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Journal of Systems Science and Information (JSSI)
97 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
91 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
87 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
86 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of California Press
85 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Copernicus
83 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
78 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
78 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
74 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SAE International
74 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL)
73 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
73 citations, 0.01%
|
|
66 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
65 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IWA Publishing
64 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
63 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
63 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
63 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
59 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
489 publications, 4.24%
|
|
Stanford University
470 publications, 4.07%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
430 publications, 3.73%
|
|
Columbia University
409 publications, 3.54%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
399 publications, 3.46%
|
|
Harvard University
327 publications, 2.83%
|
|
Duke University
293 publications, 2.54%
|
|
University of Michigan
288 publications, 2.5%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
285 publications, 2.47%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
282 publications, 2.44%
|
|
Northwestern University
275 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Cornell University
255 publications, 2.21%
|
|
New York University
246 publications, 2.13%
|
|
University of Chicago
213 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
203 publications, 1.76%
|
|
University of Southern California
196 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Texas at Dallas
188 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Purdue University
182 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
176 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Minnesota
162 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Toronto
160 publications, 1.39%
|
|
National University of Singapore
154 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
154 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
153 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
148 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Yale University
140 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Boston University
134 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
134 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Ohio State University
128 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
127 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
125 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
122 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
122 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Washington
118 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
107 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Florida
104 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Rochester
101 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of British Columbia
91 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
90 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
81 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
78 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
77 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Dartmouth College
75 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
74 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
74 publications, 0.64%
|
|
McGill University
74 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
71 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
69 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
67 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Arizona State University
66 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Emory University
66 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
65 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tilburg University
63 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Tsinghua University
62 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Houston
61 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
60 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Texas A&M University
59 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Imperial College London
58 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Virginia Tech
58 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
58 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Boston College
57 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Arizona
56 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
55 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Georgetown University
54 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Utah
54 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
53 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Cambridge
53 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Temple University
53 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Cologne
49 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Warwick
48 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Bocconi University
48 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Connecticut
47 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
45 publications, 0.39%
|
|
George Washington University
45 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Michigan State University
44 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Northeastern University
44 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Waterloo
44 publications, 0.38%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
43 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of New South Wales
42 publications, 0.36%
|
|
York University
42 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Fudan University
41 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Oxford
41 publications, 0.36%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
41 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
41 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Georgia State University
41 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Miami
40 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Peking University
39 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
39 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
39 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Syracuse University
38 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Princeton University
37 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Tulane University
37 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
37 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Zurich
36 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Melbourne
35 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Manchester
34 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Florida State University
34 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
34 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
34 publications, 0.29%
|
|
McMaster University
34 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
105 publications, 4.75%
|
|
Harvard University
88 publications, 3.98%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
86 publications, 3.89%
|
|
Cornell University
82 publications, 3.71%
|
|
Columbia University
75 publications, 3.39%
|
|
Stanford University
73 publications, 3.3%
|
|
University of Texas at Dallas
69 publications, 3.12%
|
|
National University of Singapore
63 publications, 2.85%
|
|
University of Toronto
62 publications, 2.8%
|
|
University of Michigan
57 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
53 publications, 2.4%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
53 publications, 2.4%
|
|
University of Southern California
51 publications, 2.31%
|
|
New York University
50 publications, 2.26%
|
|
Boston University
49 publications, 2.22%
|
|
Duke University
47 publications, 2.13%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
46 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
45 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
43 publications, 1.94%
|
|
University of Chicago
43 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Tsinghua University
42 publications, 1.9%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
40 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
39 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Yale University
38 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
37 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
34 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Northwestern University
34 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Minnesota
34 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
34 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
31 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
31 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
31 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
31 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Bocconi University
30 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
28 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Purdue University
28 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Washington
26 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Peking University
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Arizona State University
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of British Columbia
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Emory University
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Utah
25 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
24 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Renmin University of China
23 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Michigan State University
23 publications, 1.04%
|
|
McGill University
23 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
23 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Fudan University
22 publications, 1%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
22 publications, 1%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Imperial College London
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Cambridge
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Georgetown University
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Tilburg University
21 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
20 publications, 0.9%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
20 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
20 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Boston College
20 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
18 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
18 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Warwick
17 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
17 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Melbourne
17 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
17 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Florida
17 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Lausanne
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Oxford
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Virginia Tech
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ohio State University
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Cologne
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Texas A&M University
16 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University College London
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
15 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of New South Wales
14 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Northeastern University
14 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
14 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Dartmouth College
14 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Mannheim
14 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Stockholm School of Economics
13 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
13 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
13 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Temple University
13 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Connecticut
13 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Zhejiang University
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Zurich
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Sydney
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Monash University
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Arizona
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tinbergen Institute
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Miami
12 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Manchester
11 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tulane University
11 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
11 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Brigham Young University
11 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing countries
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 8311, 72.03%
USA
8311 publications, 72.03%
|
China
|
China, 753, 6.53%
China
753 publications, 6.53%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 740, 6.41%
Canada
740 publications, 6.41%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 649, 5.62%
United Kingdom
649 publications, 5.62%
|
France
|
France, 385, 3.34%
France
385 publications, 3.34%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 375, 3.25%
Germany
375 publications, 3.25%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 321, 2.78%
Netherlands
321 publications, 2.78%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 313, 2.71%
Singapore
313 publications, 2.71%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 244, 2.11%
Israel
244 publications, 2.11%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 173, 1.5%
Australia
173 publications, 1.5%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 143, 1.24%
Italy
143 publications, 1.24%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 142, 1.23%
Switzerland
142 publications, 1.23%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 124, 1.07%
Belgium
124 publications, 1.07%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 120, 1.04%
Spain
120 publications, 1.04%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 105, 0.91%
Republic of Korea
105 publications, 0.91%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 84, 0.73%
Denmark
84 publications, 0.73%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 76, 0.66%
Sweden
76 publications, 0.66%
|
India
|
India, 69, 0.6%
India
69 publications, 0.6%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 61, 0.53%
Austria
61 publications, 0.53%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 60, 0.52%
Norway
60 publications, 0.52%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 58, 0.5%
Turkey
58 publications, 0.5%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 54, 0.47%
Japan
54 publications, 0.47%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 43, 0.37%
Finland
43 publications, 0.37%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 41, 0.36%
Portugal
41 publications, 0.36%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 33, 0.29%
Chile
33 publications, 0.29%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 30, 0.26%
Mexico
30 publications, 0.26%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 23, 0.2%
New Zealand
23 publications, 0.2%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 21, 0.18%
Greece
21 publications, 0.18%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 18, 0.16%
Brazil
18 publications, 0.16%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 12, 0.1%
Luxembourg
12 publications, 0.1%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.1%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.1%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 9, 0.08%
Russia
9 publications, 0.08%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 9, 0.08%
Czech Republic
9 publications, 0.08%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 8, 0.07%
Argentina
8 publications, 0.07%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 8, 0.07%
Poland
8 publications, 0.07%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 0.07%
Philippines
8 publications, 0.07%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 7, 0.06%
Cyprus
7 publications, 0.06%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 0.06%
South Africa
7 publications, 0.06%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.05%
UAE
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 5, 0.04%
Hungary
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.04%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 0.04%
Thailand
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.03%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 4, 0.03%
Czechoslovakia
4 publications, 0.03%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 3, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.03%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.03%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.03%
Romania
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 3, 0.03%
Montenegro
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.02%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.02%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.02%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.02%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 2, 0.02%
Liechtenstein
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.02%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.01%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.01%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.01%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.01%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.01%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.01%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.01%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.01%
Panama
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.01%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.01%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.01%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 1, 0.01%
Faroe Islands
1 publication, 0.01%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 1, 0.01%
USSR
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (39 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1548, 70.01%
USA
1548 publications, 70.01%
|
China
|
China, 421, 19.04%
China
421 publications, 19.04%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 263, 11.9%
United Kingdom
263 publications, 11.9%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 172, 7.78%
Canada
172 publications, 7.78%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 155, 7.01%
Germany
155 publications, 7.01%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 127, 5.74%
Singapore
127 publications, 5.74%
|
France
|
France, 121, 5.47%
France
121 publications, 5.47%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 94, 4.25%
Netherlands
94 publications, 4.25%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 72, 3.26%
Australia
72 publications, 3.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 66, 2.99%
Italy
66 publications, 2.99%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 63, 2.85%
Switzerland
63 publications, 2.85%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 44, 1.99%
Belgium
44 publications, 1.99%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 44, 1.99%
Spain
44 publications, 1.99%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 39, 1.76%
Israel
39 publications, 1.76%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 35, 1.58%
Republic of Korea
35 publications, 1.58%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 26, 1.18%
Denmark
26 publications, 1.18%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 1.13%
Sweden
25 publications, 1.13%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 23, 1.04%
Austria
23 publications, 1.04%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 23, 1.04%
Norway
23 publications, 1.04%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 22, 1%
Portugal
22 publications, 1%
|
India
|
India, 18, 0.81%
India
18 publications, 0.81%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 12, 0.54%
Japan
12 publications, 0.54%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 11, 0.5%
Chile
11 publications, 0.5%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 9, 0.41%
Luxembourg
9 publications, 0.41%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 0.36%
Ireland
8 publications, 0.36%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 0.32%
Greece
7 publications, 0.32%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.32%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.32%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 0.32%
Finland
7 publications, 0.32%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 6, 0.27%
Russia
6 publications, 0.27%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 5, 0.23%
Brazil
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.18%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.18%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.18%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.18%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.18%
UAE
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 3, 0.14%
Kazakhstan
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.14%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.09%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.09%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 2, 0.09%
Liechtenstein
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.09%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.05%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.05%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.05%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.05%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.05%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.05%
Romania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.05%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (17 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
1 profile journal article
Tallon Jean-Marc

Paris School of Economics
43 publications,
1 404 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Carmona Rene
10 publications,
175 citations
h-index: 7
1 profile journal article
Salazar Gonzalez Juan Jose

University of La Laguna
121 publications,
3 562 citations
h-index: 33
1 profile journal article
Sassano Antonio
48 publications,
1 163 citations
h-index: 19