The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
44
SJR
10.247
CiteScore
61.5
Categories
Endocrinology
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Internal Medicine
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
Years of issue
2013-2025
journal names
The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
LANCET DIABETES ENDO
Top-3 citing journals

Frontiers in Endocrinology
(2768 citations)

The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
(2352 citations)

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
(2259 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(141 publications)

Imperial College London
(71 publications)

Brigham and Women's Hospital
(70 publications)

Harvard University
(58 publications)

Imperial College London
(35 publications)

Brigham and Women's Hospital
(31 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 356
Q3

How employees perceive work–family balanced HR practices: a moderated mediation analysis with psychological capital and differentiated leader–member exchange
Zhao F., Lu Y.(., Zhang P., Wang J.
PurposeWork–family balance has become one of the primary job considerations in recent years. For enterprises, the psychological behavior of employees has also received greater attention. This research aims to reveal how work–family balanced human resource practices (WFB-HRP) influence employees’ performance through psychological capital and how such influence was moderated by differentiated leader–member exchange (DLMX).Design/methodology/approachData were collected through a structured survey of 2,197 employees. The relationships among WFB-HRP, psychological capital, DLMX and employee performance were analyzed to understand the direct and indirect effects.FindingsThe findings reveal a positive association between WFB-HRP and employee performance, mediated by psychological capital. Moreover, DLMX moderates both the direct influence of WFB-HRP on employee performance and its indirect effect through psychological capital. Specifically, greater DLMX strengthens the impact of WFB-HRP on employee performance via psychological capital.Research limitations/implicationsThe research seeks to contribute to understanding how organizational practices influence employee performance in the context of work–family balance, with particular attention to the interplay of psychological factors and leadership dynamics.Practical implicationsThis research underscores the importance of implementing work-family balanced HR practices for enhancing employee performance. Moreover, it highlights the significance of fostering positive psychological capital among employees and cultivating differentiated leader–member exchange to maximize the effectiveness of WFB-HRP initiatives.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by elucidating the mechanisms through which WFB-HRP influences employee performance, emphasizing the pivotal roles of psychological capital and DLMX. The findings offer practical insights for organizations seeking to optimize their HR practices and leadership strategies to unlock high performance in the workplace.
Q3

Stay positive, keep them committed: extending the link between positive leadership and affective commitment
Kelm S., Borchert M.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of positive leadership (PL), a theory originating from positive psychology, on affective commitment (AC), an important outcome in times of skilled labor shortages. This study also examines psychological need satisfaction (PNS) and well-being as serial mediators between PL and AC.Design/methodology/approachA 2-wave-study with 282 employees of a German company in the finance and insurance sector was conducted. The data were analyzed using covariance analytic structural equation modeling with RStudio.FindingsThe results suggest that PL improves AC. Additionally, PNS and well-being mediate this relationship individually and serially.Originality/valueOur study is one of the few to examine PL as a leadership style in its own right and not a synonym for various leadership styles (e.g. transformational leadership) and one of the first to emphasize its importance for employee retention. Moreover, we make a unique contribution by combining work design theory and self-determination theory to examine the underlying mechanisms of the influence of PL on AC. Therefore, this research is the first to investigate a serial mediation between PL, PNS, well-being and AC.
Q3

The impact of boundary crossing on well-being among remote workers and the moderating role of nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR)
Song X., Gong B.
PurposeAs businesses are going on around the clock and the prevalence of remote work arrangements is on the rise, the boundary between work and nonwork contexts is blurring. As a result, workers often find themselves interrupted by their supervisors or colleagues during nonwork hours. However, there is still much to reveal about the impact of boundary-crossing activities on work–life balance as well as how a remote worker’s boundary management capacity may influence this impact. This paper aims to answer these unaddressed questions.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal survey was administered using a quantitative method, with 336 US workers providing valid responses. The data were analyzed using regression-based path analysis.FindingsThe findings provide evidence that boundary-crossing activities impact remote workers’ work–life balance, and individual differences in boundary management ability, such as nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR), help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Research limitations/implicationsDrawn from boundary management theory, this study reveals a process effect, through which remote work experience influences work-related interruption during nonwork hours, which impacts work–life balance and well-being. Meanwhile, this study demonstrates that individual differences in NWRR help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Originality/valueThis research offers valuable insights into the intricate relationships between remote work experiences, boundary-crossing activities, work–life balance and employee well-being. By investigating the mechanisms and individual differences involved, this study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical strategies for navigating the challenges of the evolving work landscape with remote work blended.
Q3

Does responsible leadership via voice behavior promote green behavior?
Uzum B., Ozkan O.S., Ozkurt Sivrikaya S., Ciftyildiz K.
PurposeThis study, which utilizes the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, aims to explicate the relationship between responsible leadership (RL), green behavior (GB) and the mediating role of voice behavior (VB).Design/methodology/approachThis study used a quantitative research design. The research sample consists of 260 participants who work in five-star hotels in Izmir. The research data were collected through face-to-face and online survey methods. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS was performed to assess the measurement model. The research hypotheses were tested with structural equation modeling (SEM).FindingsThe results determined that RL affects GB and VB positively and significantly. In addition, VB has a significant positive link with GB. Furthermore, this study discovered that VB acts as a mediator in the relationship between RL and GB, indicating that RL indirectly promotes GB through implementing VB.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has limitations, such as its dependence on self-reported data, cross-sectional design and exclusive emphasis on participants from a single nation. When RL encourages employees to take GB, they are more likely to engage in GB. This study contributes to the field by evaluating the structures discussed with the JD-R theory. In the management practice of organizations, RL should be strengthened, and training should be provided to enhance RL.Originality/valueThe literature analysis revealed that, while studies have been undertaken using RL, the idea has not been tested using VB or has it been investigated in the hotel business, which has grown vital to the global economy. With these aspects, the work stands apart and serves as a source of motivation for researchers.
Q3

The shadowy realm of proactivity: how rumination fuels work–life conflict
Goswami M., Dash S.
PurposeThe current study explores the linking mechanisms and conditional processes underlying the relationship between proactive work behavior (PWB) and work-life conflict (WLC), and the mediating role of rumination. Based on the conservation of resources theory, we hypothesized that PWB is a resource-consuming activity that increases emotional and cognitive strain by making one ruminate (demarcated as reflection/reflective pondering and brooding), which in turn, results in work-to-life conflict.Design/methodology/approachMulti-phased data was obtained from 244 working Indian adults who were working full-time in organization across India. Data was analyzed using structural equation modelling, using SPSS (v.26) and AMOS (v.23).FindingsOverall, empirical data supported our model. Our finding indicates that PWB impact WLC, mediated through rumination (reflection and brooding) differentially. Brooding mediated between PWB and WLC (p < 0.001). Reflective pondering had a negative influence on WLC, and also had a negative indirect impact between PWB and WLC (p = 0.022).Originality/valueOur study adds on to the research on the negative outcome of proactive work behavior (i.e., causing work-to-life conflict). Additionally, our study also explores the indirect pathway of proactive work behavior that impacts work-life conflict, through rumination. We further demarcated between the two types of rumination, viz., reflective pondering and brooding, and established that they have different influences on this relationship between PWB and WLC.
Q3

Breaking barriers: driving HR analytics adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises
Ilyas M., Alam W., Ahmad A.
PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the primary factors driving human resource analytics adoption in small and medium-sized organizations. The research seeks to confirm and expand the UTAUT model using direct predictors and a unique moderator to understand contextual complexities in a developing country.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed convenience sampling to survey 308 HR experts with an 88% response rate, uncovering valuable insights into technology integration. SPSS and AMOS 21.0 were used for analysis.FindingsThe influencing elements for adopting human resource analytics in these firms were performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions and social influence. Moreover, personal innovativeness, fear appeal and perceived trust were highlighted as additional significant determinants. Finally, perceived supervisor support was reported as a significant moderator in driving human resource analytics adoption.Originality/valueThe study comprehensively models the elements that influence the adoption of human resource analytics in SMEs of a developing economy. The research validates and expands upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, analyzing key contributors and a unique context-specific moderator using robust statistical methods.
Q3

Organizational climate for initiative and innovative work behavior: a moderated mediation model
Hassi A., Rohlfer S., Jebsen S.
PurposeThis paper aimed at investigating the relationship between organizational climate for initiative, job autonomy, climate for innovation and innovative work behavior (IWB) in a developing economy context.Design/methodology/approachThe study surveyed 444 manufacturing businesses in Morocco, collecting data from three sources: CEOs, middle managers and non-managerial employees in the production department. The data were analyzed using structural equation modelling, the Bayesian estimation approach and the bootstrapped moderated mediation technique.FindingsThis study revealed that middle managers’ job autonomy mediates the positive link between climate for initiative and middle managers’ IWB when climate for innovation is strong.Practical implicationsThis study provides practical information for organizations intending to make their middle managers willing to be innovative in their job by granting them job autonomy and building favorable climates for initiative and innovation.Originality/valueThis research expands the human resource management and innovation literature by examining features of the work context (i.e. climates for initiative and for innovation, and job autonomy) as previous research has mainly focused on the context approach to work design (i.e. social environment of work design). The study highlights the role of middle managers as essential contributors to fostering innovations within their firms.
Q3

Measuring the impact of leadership attributes on employee engagement through psychological empowerment: a study from the pharmaceutical industry
Rasheed R., Rashid A., Tunio M.N., Amirah N.A.
PurposeManagers are continuously worried about the engagement of employees in the organization. This research aimed to investigate the employees’ perceptions regarding leadership attributes, which enhance the workers’ psychological empowerment and engagement.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 296 employees from three pharmaceutical companies based in Karachi was selected. For hypothesis testing, IBM SPSS AMOS version 24 was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling.FindingsThe outcomes of multiple regression analysis expressed that the attributes of a leader positively influence psychological empowerment and employee engagement. The study found that psychological empowerment partially mediates the relationship between leadership attributes (feedback and delegation) and employee retention. Furthermore, psychological empowerment has no mediation between leadership attributes (empathy) and employee retention.Originality/valueThis study offers a unique contribution by focusing on the relationship between leadership attributes (empathy, delegation and feedback) and employee engagement within the pharmaceutical industry in Karachi, a relatively underexplored context. Psychological empowerment as a partial mediator between leadership attributes and employee retention adds a novel perspective, particularly by revealing that it mediates the impact of delegation and feedback but not empathy. Moreover, this research provides actionable insights for policymakers and operational managers in industries beyond pharmaceuticals, making it valuable for enhancing employee engagement across sectors. Advanced statistical techniques like structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis further reinforce the study’s methodological rigour.
Q3

The role of resilience and gender in satisfaction with life and self-efficacy: a moderated mediation framework
Saha S., Saini G.K.
PurposeTo study the mediating effect of resilience and the moderating effect of gender on the association between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachParticipants were 211 HR professionals; mediation and moderation hypotheses were tested using PROCESS macro.FindingsResults revealed a significant association between satisfaction with life, self-efficacy and dimensions of resilience. The mediating effect was significant for three dimensions of resilience: positive acceptance, personal competence and trust in one’s instincts. Gender moderated the relationship between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy through positive acceptance and positive competence but not trust in one’s instincts.Originality/valueMost literature examines satisfaction with life as an outcome measure despite existing calls and alternate theoretical frameworks. This study considers satisfaction with life as a predictor of self-efficacy and resilience. Linkages with theoretical frameworks and implications are discussed.
Q3

The digital escape: examining the impact of cyberloafing on gossip-induced emotional exhaustion and the mediating role of self-esteem
Kaur A., Maheshwari S., Varma A.
PurposeThis research sheds light on how workplace gossip may affect employees' emotional well-being via self-esteem. Further, the study examines the moderating role of cyberloafing in the examined relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a moderated mediation model to examine the linkage among workplace gossip, self-esteem, and emotional exhaustion, incorporating cyberloafing as a moderator. Data were gathered from 249 employees working in various industries from the US.FindingsWorkplace gossip substantially diminishes self-esteem, which is inversely related to emotional exhaustion. Notably, cyberloafing positively moderates the relationship between self-esteem and emotional exhaustion, heightening the adverse effects of gossip.Practical implicationsThe findings have critical implications for human resource management strategies. To mitigate the impact of gossip, HR managers should foster positive work environments, promote emotional well-being, and implement policies to curb cyberloafing.Originality/valueThis study expands the discussion on workplace gossip while probing the role of self-esteem and cyberloafing. It contributes to the application of the conservation of resource theory to analyze emotional well-being in organizational settings.
Q3

Toxic workplaces, tarnished outcomes: understanding the effects of bullying on job outcomes
Iqbal J., Parray Z.A., Bharadwaj S.
PurposeThis study examines the impact of workplace bullying on workers’ innovative behavior, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment while taking burnout into account as a potential mediator.Design/methodology/approachWe hypothesize that workplace bullying will have a detrimental effect on employees’ capacity for innovative behavior and OCB, as well as impair their affective commitment to the company, based on the Conservation of Resource theory. We used cluster sampling to gather data from 249 bank employees, using structural equation modeling to evaluate our assumptions.FindingsAccording to our research, there is a strong negative correlation between workplace bullying and innovative behavior, OCB and a reduction in affective commitment. Additionally, burnout was found to be a key mediator between these outcomes and workplace bullying, indicating a critical role for burnout in spreading the negative impacts of bullying on employees’ attitudes and behaviors.Originality/valueThe results of this study show how bullying at work harms employees’ innovative behavior, OCB and affective commitment, which might eventually lower organizational productivity and performance. It is important to develop a culture of creativity, increase employee engagement and strengthen organizational commitment by building a friendly and courteous work environment. Collectively addressing burnout and workplace bullying will increase employee well-being, job happiness and overall organizational success.
Q3

Linking paternalistic leadership and service behaviours through perceived support from supervisor and organisation: empirical evidence from the Pakistani healthcare sector
Hussain M., Luu T.T., Marjoribanks T.
PurposeDrawing upon social exchange theory, this study aims to assess whether paternalistic leadership style (authoritarianism, benevolence and morality) influences employee in-role service behaviour and extra-role service behaviour, particularly patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour via a dual mediation mechanism, i.e. perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support.Design/methodology/approachThe data were gathered from doctors and nurses working in Pakistan’s public, private and semi-government hospitals. We used SPSS and AMOS 27 to run structural equation modelling.FindingsResults revealed that authoritarianism was negatively associated with in-role service behaviour and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour through perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. In contrast, benevolent and moral behaviours of leaders were positively associated with in-role service behaviour via perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. However, perceived supervisor support did not mediate the relations between paternalistic leadership dimensions and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour.Originality/valueOur research advances the paternalistic leadership literature concerning paternalistic leadership and employees’ service behaviours through dual mediation mechanisms and in a relatively understudied sector and national context.
Q3

Unleashing service recovery excellence: exploring the power of dimensional autonomy and thriving at work as catalysts during COVID-19
Farid H., Zhang Y., Tian M., Lu S.
PurposeThis study explores how three-dimensional job autonomy (decision-making, work method and work scheduling) affects employees’ thriving at work and service recovery performance in the hospitality industry during COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilized cross-sectional dyadic data from 287 frontline workers in the Chinese hospitality sector and analyzed it with Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) and the PROCESS macro.FindingsThe findings indicate that three-dimensional autonomy has a direct impact on thriving and an indirect effect on service recovery performance (SRP) through thriving, and the relationship between three-dimensional autonomy and thriving is moderated by SOCV19R.Originality/valueThis study addresses the existing gap in research regarding the various aspects of autonomy. It explores how distinct dimensions of autonomy affect employees’ thriving at work and, in turn, influence their ability to excel in service recovery. Furthermore, it sheds light on how the unique circumstances of COVID-19, as represented by SOCV19R, play a role in understanding the dynamics between different forms of autonomy and employees’ thriving.
Q3

Interplay between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership to promote intrapreneurial behavior for innovation performance in small- and medium-sized enterprises
Rasheed M.A., Elahi N.S., Nisar Q.A., Nasir N.
PurposeDrawing on ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) framework, this study investigates the direct effect of innovation-oriented HRM on SMEs’ innovation performance, both directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Besides, the study assesses the moderating role of innovation-oriented leadership in the relationship between innovation-oriented HRM and intrapreneurial behavior.Design/methodology/approachA two-wave dataset collected from 183 SMEs was used to test the proposed hypotheses by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsFindings suggest that innovation-oriented HRM positively impacts SMEs’ innovation performance directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Evidence also confirms that innovation-oriented leadership positively moderates the effect of innovation-oriented HRM on intrapreneurial behavior.Research limitations/implicationsThrough the AMO framework, this study advances our understanding of how the interaction between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership fosters intrapreneurial behavior, ultimately contributing to superior innovation performance in SMEs.Practical implicationsThe study recommends that SMEs implement innovation-oriented HRM practices to encourage intrapreneurial behavior and achieve superior innovation performance in SMEs.Originality/valueLimited research has addressed the contributions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership toward realizing strategic innovation objectives. Our study offers valuable insights into the functions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership in stimulating intrapreneurial behavior, thereby enhancing the innovation performance of SMEs.
Q3

Unravelling the impact: supervisor incivility on employee health and the role of affective rumination
Kyei-Poku I., Orozco Quijano E.P.
PurposeThis study investigates the influence of supervisor incivility on two important employee health-related outcomes–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion. Similarly, the study examines the role of affective rumination as a mediator between the supervisor incivility–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion relationship.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data in three phases, separated by an interval of four weeks. The final sample comprised 154 employees from diverse occupations and professions. Partial least squares–structural equation modelling was used to examine the research model.FindingsEmployees’ perceptions of supervisor incivility increased somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion experiences. Moreover, drawing on the conservation of resources and the effort-recovery theories, we found support for the mediating role of affective rumination for somatic complaints but not for emotional exhaustion.Practical implicationsTo help protect organizations from financial and productivity losses related to supervisor incivility, we encouraged organizations to be aware of supervisors’ uncivil behaviours and provide training on how to deal with such behaviours. We further advise organizations to coach supervisors on uncivil prevention and the importance of modelling proper behaviours.Originality/valueThis study expands the limited knowledge of supervisor incivility and health outcomes. Specifically, using a time-lagged design, the findings show that affective rumination is an essential mechanism for understanding the impact of supervisor incivility on health outcomes. Moreover, understanding how supervisor incivility impacts employee health outcomes is vital for advancing theory and designing interventions to mitigate adverse effects.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
2768 citations, 2.09%
|
|
The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
2352 citations, 1.77%
|
|
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
2259 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Nutrients
2033 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Diabetes Care
1906 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
1768 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
1229 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1224 citations, 0.92%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1222 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Diabetologia
1135 citations, 0.86%
|
|
PLoS ONE
1056 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
972 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Cardiovascular Diabetology
858 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Diabetes Therapy
820 citations, 0.62%
|
|
BMJ Open
713 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
595 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Diabetic Medicine
574 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Endocrine
556 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics
478 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Obesity Surgery
456 citations, 0.34%
|
|
BMC Public Health
425 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
408 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
402 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
398 citations, 0.3%
|
|
BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
375 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cureus
369 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Circulation
357 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Endocrine Practice
348 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Current Diabetes Reports
341 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Biomedicines
339 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinical Endocrinology
335 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
332 citations, 0.25%
|
|
The Lancet
325 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Obesity
314 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of diabetes science and technology
312 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
307 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Obesity
300 citations, 0.23%
|
|
European Journal of Endocrinology
299 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
295 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
294 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
294 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Thyroid
292 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Acta Diabetologica
282 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
277 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
265 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
257 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Heart Journal
253 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Endocrinology
251 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel
251 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Endocrine Society
243 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of the American Heart Association
241 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
239 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
237 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Hypertension
230 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
229 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Atherosclerosis
228 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
228 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
224 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
220 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
219 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
218 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Diabetes
212 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Osteoporosis International
209 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
206 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Obesity Reviews
205 citations, 0.15%
|
|
World Journal of Diabetes
199 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Primary Care Diabetes
198 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bone
197 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Die Diabetologie
196 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Kidney International
193 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Hypertension
187 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
187 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Endocrine Reviews
186 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Diabetes
185 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMJ
185 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Diabetes and Metabolism
184 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
184 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
183 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques
180 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Best Practice and Research in Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
177 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Endocrine Disorders
175 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
173 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hypertension Research
168 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cancers
165 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
164 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Medicine
160 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pituitary
154 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pediatric Diabetes
152 citations, 0.11%
|
|
New England Journal of Medicine
150 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
150 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes
148 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Diabetologe
146 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Current Atherosclerosis Reports
142 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
142 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
140 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
139 citations, 0.1%
|
|
CKJ: Clinical Kidney Journal
138 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Advances in Therapy
137 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Diabetes Research
132 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
130 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
|
Elsevier
28592 citations, 21.54%
|
|
Springer Nature
25815 citations, 19.45%
|
|
Wiley
12993 citations, 9.79%
|
|
MDPI
9347 citations, 7.04%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
6965 citations, 5.25%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4746 citations, 3.58%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4209 citations, 3.17%
|
|
Oxford University Press
3023 citations, 2.28%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
2841 citations, 2.14%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
2515 citations, 1.9%
|
|
BMJ
2501 citations, 1.88%
|
|
SAGE
2157 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1741 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1563 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1436 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1325 citations, 1%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
949 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
727 citations, 0.55%
|
|
JMIR Publications
709 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
691 citations, 0.52%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
631 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
586 citations, 0.44%
|
|
S. Karger AG
524 citations, 0.39%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
420 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
394 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
363 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology
346 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Physiological Society
280 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
261 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
260 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Bioscientifica
258 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
244 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
241 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
221 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
215 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Endocrinology Research Centre
207 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Medknow
205 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
203 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
187 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IntechOpen
161 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American College of Physicians
155 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SciELO
143 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
142 citations, 0.11%
|
|
F1000 Research
135 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
124 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Japan Endocrine Society
119 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Korean Endocrine Society
117 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
101 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Korean Diabetes Association
101 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Impact Journals
99 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
95 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
92 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
86 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
81 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
75 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Portland Press
73 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
71 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
71 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
70 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
65 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
63 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
59 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Segmento Farma Editores
56 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
54 citations, 0.04%
|
|
XMLink
54 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
53 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
53 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Touch Medical Media LTD.
52 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
51 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
50 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
49 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society for the Study of Obesity
48 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
43 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
43 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Emerald
42 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
40 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Circulation Society
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
35 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
35 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
34 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Radcliffe Media Media Ltd
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cardiological Society of India
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AOSIS
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Human Kinetics
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Nuclear Medicine
28 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
27 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Higher Education Press
27 citations, 0.02%
|
|
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Harvard University
141 publications, 5.07%
|
|
Imperial College London
71 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
70 publications, 2.52%
|
|
University of Oxford
67 publications, 2.41%
|
|
University College London
62 publications, 2.23%
|
|
University of Glasgow
50 publications, 1.8%
|
|
King's College London
48 publications, 1.73%
|
|
University of Cambridge
46 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Sydney
46 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Toronto
44 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
43 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Monash University
42 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
41 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
37 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Birmingham
36 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
36 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
35 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Washington
33 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Stanford University
32 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
32 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
31 publications, 1.12%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
31 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Leicester
31 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
29 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
28 publications, 1.01%
|
|
The George Institute for Global Health
28 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Michigan
27 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
27 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Novo Nordisk
26 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Emory University
26 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Sheffield
26 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
25 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Auckland
25 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Bristol
25 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
25 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
24 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
24 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Columbia University
23 publications, 0.83%
|
|
McMaster University
23 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
22 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Western Australia
22 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
22 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
22 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
22 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Peking University
21 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
21 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
21 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
21 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
21 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Southampton
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
20 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of New South Wales
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Yale University
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Boston University
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
19 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Helsinki
18 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Melbourne
18 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Newcastle University
18 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Western University
18 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
17 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Maastricht University Medical Center+
17 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Pisa
17 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
17 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Paris Cité University
17 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Florida
16 publications, 0.58%
|
|
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
16 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Aston University
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Queensland
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Deakin University
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Cardiff University
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Leeds
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University College Dublin
15 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Uppsala University
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Helsinki University Hospital
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
14 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Hamilton Health Sciences
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Minnesota
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Alberta
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Exeter
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Surrey
13 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Milan
12 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Harvard University
58 publications, 5.43%
|
|
Imperial College London
35 publications, 3.27%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
31 publications, 2.9%
|
|
King's College London
30 publications, 2.81%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
26 publications, 2.43%
|
|
University of Oxford
22 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Monash University
22 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of Toronto
21 publications, 1.96%
|
|
University of Glasgow
19 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Washington
17 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
17 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Leicester
17 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Cambridge
16 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
15 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Birmingham
15 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Stanford University
15 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University College London
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Novo Nordisk
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Sydney
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
14 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
13 publications, 1.22%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
13 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Emory University
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Florida
12 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
11 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Michigan
11 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
11 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
11 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Yale University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Melbourne
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Newcastle University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Leeds
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Helsinki University Hospital
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Helsinki
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Pisa
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Sheffield
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University College Dublin
9 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Western Australia
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
McMaster University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
International Agency for Research on Cancer
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Aston University
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Auckland
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Bristol
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Paris Cité University
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille
7 publications, 0.65%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Maastricht University Medical Center+
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Odense University Hospital
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Queensland
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Helmholtz Zentrum München
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Pasteur Institute of Lille
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Hamilton Health Sciences
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Cardiff University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Western University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Alberta
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Exeter
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Cancer Institute
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Sheba Medical Center
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Hamad Medical Corporation
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lund University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 665, 23.92%
USA
665 publications, 23.92%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 585, 21.04%
United Kingdom
585 publications, 21.04%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 195, 7.01%
Australia
195 publications, 7.01%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 184, 6.62%
Netherlands
184 publications, 6.62%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 164, 5.9%
Italy
164 publications, 5.9%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 161, 5.79%
Germany
161 publications, 5.79%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 160, 5.76%
Canada
160 publications, 5.76%
|
China
|
China, 140, 5.04%
China
140 publications, 5.04%
|
France
|
France, 129, 4.64%
France
129 publications, 4.64%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 113, 4.06%
Denmark
113 publications, 4.06%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 96, 3.45%
Sweden
96 publications, 3.45%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 83, 2.99%
Switzerland
83 publications, 2.99%
|
India
|
India, 69, 2.48%
India
69 publications, 2.48%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 68, 2.45%
Spain
68 publications, 2.45%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 66, 2.37%
Belgium
66 publications, 2.37%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 48, 1.73%
Japan
48 publications, 1.73%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 47, 1.69%
Finland
47 publications, 1.69%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 45, 1.62%
Brazil
45 publications, 1.62%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 34, 1.22%
New Zealand
34 publications, 1.22%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 34, 1.22%
South Africa
34 publications, 1.22%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 31, 1.12%
Israel
31 publications, 1.12%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 29, 1.04%
Singapore
29 publications, 1.04%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 28, 1.01%
Norway
28 publications, 1.01%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 24, 0.86%
Austria
24 publications, 0.86%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 20, 0.72%
Mexico
20 publications, 0.72%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 18, 0.65%
Greece
18 publications, 0.65%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 18, 0.65%
Ireland
18 publications, 0.65%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 17, 0.61%
Poland
17 publications, 0.61%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 17, 0.61%
Republic of Korea
17 publications, 0.61%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 15, 0.54%
Chile
15 publications, 0.54%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 14, 0.5%
Argentina
14 publications, 0.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 12, 0.43%
Russia
12 publications, 0.43%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 12, 0.43%
Pakistan
12 publications, 0.43%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 12, 0.43%
Turkey
12 publications, 0.43%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 11, 0.4%
Hungary
11 publications, 0.4%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 11, 0.4%
Czech Republic
11 publications, 0.4%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 9, 0.32%
Tanzania
9 publications, 0.32%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 9, 0.32%
Uganda
9 publications, 0.32%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 8, 0.29%
Peru
8 publications, 0.29%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 8, 0.29%
Romania
8 publications, 0.29%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 7, 0.25%
Kenya
7 publications, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 7, 0.25%
UAE
7 publications, 0.25%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 7, 0.25%
Slovenia
7 publications, 0.25%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 0.25%
Thailand
7 publications, 0.25%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.22%
Iran
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 6, 0.22%
Cameroon
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 0.22%
Qatar
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 6, 0.22%
Philippines
6 publications, 0.22%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.18%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.18%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 5, 0.18%
Malawi
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 5, 0.18%
Sri Lanka
5 publications, 0.18%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.14%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.14%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 4, 0.14%
Kuwait
4 publications, 0.14%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.14%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.14%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 4, 0.14%
Mozambique
4 publications, 0.14%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.14%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.14%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.11%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.11%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 0.11%
Ghana
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.11%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.11%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.11%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.11%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.11%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.11%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 3, 0.11%
Rwanda
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 2, 0.07%
Belarus
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 2, 0.07%
Benin
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.07%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 2, 0.07%
Gambia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 2, 0.07%
Guatemala
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Guinea
|
Guinea, 2, 0.07%
Guinea
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.07%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 0.07%
Cambodia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Congo-Brazzaville
|
Congo-Brazzaville, 2, 0.07%
Congo-Brazzaville
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.07%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.07%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 2, 0.07%
Mali
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.07%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.07%
Oman
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 2, 0.07%
Palestine
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.07%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 2, 0.07%
Jamaica
2 publications, 0.07%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.04%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.04%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Haiti
|
Haiti, 1, 0.04%
Haiti
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.04%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.04%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Kiribati
|
Kiribati, 1, 0.04%
Kiribati
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.04%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Liberia
|
Liberia, 1, 0.04%
Liberia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.04%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.04%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Marshall Islands
|
Marshall Islands, 1, 0.04%
Marshall Islands
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.04%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.04%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.04%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.04%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.04%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 244, 22.83%
USA
244 publications, 22.83%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 198, 18.52%
United Kingdom
198 publications, 18.52%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 77, 7.2%
Germany
77 publications, 7.2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 76, 7.11%
Italy
76 publications, 7.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 62, 5.8%
Canada
62 publications, 5.8%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 59, 5.52%
Australia
59 publications, 5.52%
|
France
|
France, 55, 5.14%
France
55 publications, 5.14%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 48, 4.49%
Netherlands
48 publications, 4.49%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 46, 4.3%
Denmark
46 publications, 4.3%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 36, 3.37%
Sweden
36 publications, 3.37%
|
China
|
China, 32, 2.99%
China
32 publications, 2.99%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 31, 2.9%
Switzerland
31 publications, 2.9%
|
India
|
India, 28, 2.62%
India
28 publications, 2.62%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 26, 2.43%
Spain
26 publications, 2.43%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 25, 2.34%
Brazil
25 publications, 2.34%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 23, 2.15%
Belgium
23 publications, 2.15%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 23, 2.15%
Finland
23 publications, 2.15%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 22, 2.06%
Japan
22 publications, 2.06%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 17, 1.59%
Israel
17 publications, 1.59%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 14, 1.31%
Norway
14 publications, 1.31%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 12, 1.12%
Singapore
12 publications, 1.12%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 11, 1.03%
Austria
11 publications, 1.03%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 10, 0.94%
Greece
10 publications, 0.94%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 10, 0.94%
Mexico
10 publications, 0.94%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 0.94%
South Africa
10 publications, 0.94%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 0.84%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 0.84%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 0.75%
Russia
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 0.75%
Ireland
8 publications, 0.75%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 0.75%
New Zealand
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 8, 0.75%
Poland
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.56%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.56%
Chile
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.47%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 5, 0.47%
Qatar
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 5, 0.47%
Tanzania
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 5, 0.47%
Uganda
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.37%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 4, 0.37%
Cameroon
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.37%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.37%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.37%
UAE
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.37%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.37%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 4, 0.37%
Philippines
4 publications, 0.37%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.28%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.28%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.28%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.28%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.28%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.28%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.28%
Peru
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.28%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.28%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.19%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.19%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 2, 0.19%
Gambia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.19%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.19%
Zimbabwe
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.19%
Iran
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.19%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Congo-Brazzaville
|
Congo-Brazzaville, 2, 0.19%
Congo-Brazzaville
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.19%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 2, 0.19%
Mali
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 0.19%
Mozambique
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 2, 0.19%
Palestine
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.19%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.09%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.09%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.09%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.09%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Guinea
|
Guinea, 1, 0.09%
Guinea
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.09%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.09%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.09%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.09%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.09%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.09%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.09%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.09%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.09%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.09%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.09%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.09%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.09%
Romania
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.09%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.09%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.09%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.09%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.09%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.09%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.09%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.09%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (61 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
4 profile journal articles
Juul Jens
1 741 publications,
110 690 citations
h-index: 161
1 profile journal article
Batalov Anastas
🤝
71 publications,
1 707 citations
h-index: 13
1 profile journal article
Kulebyakin Konstantin

Lomonosov Moscow State University
37 publications,
519 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Wake Rachel

St George's, University of London
61 publications,
6 740 citations
h-index: 30
1 profile journal article
Takamura Toshinari

Kanazawa University
264 publications,
9 402 citations
h-index: 49
1 profile journal article
Uccelli Matteo
85 publications,
1 278 citations
h-index: 17