Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
3.9
SJR
1.253
CiteScore
7.1
Categories
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Areas
Health Professions
Medicine
Years of issue
2015-2025
journal names
BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine
BMJ OPEN SPORT EXERC
Top-3 citing journals

BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine
(464 citations)

British Journal of Sports Medicine
(346 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Amsterdam University Medical Center
(68 publications)

University of Cape Town
(40 publications)

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
(37 publications)

Amsterdam University Medical Center
(56 publications)

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
(29 publications)

University of Amsterdam
(26 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4759
Q2

Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Injectable Hydroxyapatite Cement and Its Application in Compressive Tibial Plateau Fractures
Zhou X., Sun X., Chen G., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Qian Z., Zeng Q., Miao J.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTInjectable carbonated hydroxyapatite (ICHA) cement was developed by adding 2% Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) to carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) cement, improving its rheological properties and injectability for minimally invasive orthopedic use. The cement's physical and chemical properties, including curing time, strength, porosity, and consistency, were tested in vitro. Scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to analyze the cured cement. Bone marrow stromal cells were cultured with ICHA cement extracts and specimens to test cell growth (MTT assay) and cytotoxicity. In vivo, the cement was implanted into rabbit muscles to assess inflammation and capsule formation, along with other biocompatibility tests, including hemolysis and pyrogen testing. ICHA cement sets without heat generation, with a 9‐min initial setting time and a 15‐min final setting time, similar to CHA cement. The strength reaches 20 MPa after 1 day and peaks at 35 MPa after 7 days. Its porosity is slightly higher than CHA cement, and it resists dilution well, preventing disintegration in water. The consistency of ICHA cement is lower than CHA cement at different time points (p < 0.001), showing a logarithmic change pattern. With adjustable setting time, good resistance to dilution, and compressive strength similar to cancellous bone, ICHA cement is well suited for clinical use. Its composition closely resembles natural bone, offering strong fixation and stability for tibial plateau healing, which supports early movement and reduces the risk of joint stiffness and post‐traumatic arthritis.
Q2

Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering—A Narrative Review
Choudhury S., Das D., Roy S., Chowdhury A.R.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTo examine natural bone's bioelectrical traits, notably its piezoelectricity, and to look into how these characteristics influence bone growth and repair. In the context of exploring the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials, such as biopolymers and bio‐ceramics, towards orthopedic and bone regeneration applications, the research seeks to evaluate the significance of piezoelectricity‐driven osteogenesis. The paper reviews recent research on bone's electrical and dielectric properties, surface polarization/electrical stimulation effects interacting with cell activity and the effectiveness of piezoelectric biomaterials to support tissues' regenerative process. The study includes a number of materials, such as collagen, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and barium titanate. The applications of piezoelectric bio‐ceramics, piezoelectric organic polymers, and piezoelectric natural polymers are particularly highlighted. Piezoelectric biomaterials are being shown in recent studies to enhance cellular metabolism in vitro as well as promote the regeneration of tissues in vivo, especially when paired with electric field stimulation or interface polarization. Piezoelectric bio‐ceramics like magnesium silicate and barium titanate, as well as biopolymers like collagen and PVDF, have shown possibilities for orthopedic applications. However, there are several challenges regarding the manufacturing of bio‐ceramics of specific compositions having the desired properties. This review highlighted the potential of piezoelectric biomaterials in orthopedic applications with special emphasis on biopolymers and bioceramics. Therefore, these types of materials have huge potential for bone regeneration because they can mimic the piezoelectric properties of bone and allow better advances in tissue engineering or regenerative medicine. To date, little is known about their mechanism of action, and modifications are needed to improve efficacy for clinical uptake.
Q2

Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate Foam and Paste Bone Grafting Materials Designed for Improved Surgical Handling on Osteogenesis in a Sheep Scapula Model
Neckel N., Wüster J., Xiang‐Tischhauser L., Mir S., Adel‐Khattab D., Stang B., Kuhr A., Barnewitz D., Genzel A., Koerdt S., Rendenbach C., Heiland M., Nahles S., Stiller M., Knabe C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTReconstruction of critical‐size bone defects (CSDs) with complex defect morphologies remains clinically challenging. The desire to avoid autograft harvesting has prompted an increasing quest for adequate synthetic bone grafting materials. The clinical success rates, which have been achieved with bioactive β‐tricalcium phosphate granules (TCP‐G) demonstrate that these materials have become an excellent alternative graft choice. In order to improve surgical handling properties, TCP‐G have been combined with natural polymers for creating paste‐ and foam‐like materials, which can easily be molded into any desired shape when grafting a given bony defect or deploying them with a syringe. This study assessed the effect of a TCP paste (TCP‐P) and a TCP‐foam (TCP‐F) bone grafting material as compared to TCP‐G on bone formation and osteogenic marker expression after 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of implantation in CSD in the sheep scapula and tested the hypothesis that the addition of natural polymers would not diminish the osteogenic properties of TCP‐P and TCP‐F. The bone and bone graft material area fractions were determined histomorphometrically in order to quantify bone formation and bone graft material resorption. Immunohistochemical analysis of collagen type I, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein expression in the various cell and matrix components of the bone tissue was performed on resin‐embedded sections for characterizing the osteogenic and bioactive properties of the test materials. By 6 months, all three TCP materials facilitated excellent defect regeneration with further bone remodeling at 12 and 18 months. TCP‐F and TCP‐P induced greater osteocalcin expression and exhibited more advanced graft material resorption at 1 and 6 months, respectively. At 18 months, all three grafting materials were almost fully resorbed with the original bony architecture being restored. Taken together, the hyaluronic acid and methylcellulose components in TCP‐P and porcine collagen components in TCP‐F did not diminish the osteogenic capacity of TCP‐P and TCP‐F, which exhibited an even slightly higher resorbability and enhancement effect on OC expression by osteoblasts.
Q2

Biological Coatings: Advanced Strategies Driving Multifunctionality and Clinical Potential in Dermal Substitutes
Wu Y., Ji C., Yan Z., Fang X., Wang Y., Ma Y., Li J., Jin S., Chen H., Ji S., Zheng Y., Xiao S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTSkin tissue defects caused by various acute and chronic etiologies frequently occur in clinical medicine. Traditional surgical repair methods have certain limitations, while dermal substitutes combined with skin grafting have become an alternative to conventional surgery. Biological coatings, by loading bioactive substances such as polysaccharides and proteins, or by using bioactive substances as carriers, can promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. This optimizes the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the substitutes, enhances their antibacterial properties, and improves their feasibility for clinical application. This paper explores various common biological coating materials and the construction methods used in the field of dermal substitutes. It highlights the importance and necessity of biological coatings in the development of multifunctional designs for dermal substitutes. By summarizing the current research, this paper aims to offer new insights and references for the multifunctional design and clinical application of dermal substitutes.
Q2

Evaluation of Burn Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration in Animal Model Using Alginate/PVA Nanofibrous Wound Dressings Containing Dragon's Blood
Seyedi D., Salehi M., Zamani S., Cheraghali D., Dehghani F., Mehrabi M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe challenge of healing burn wounds is significant importance in global healthcare systems, with a high demand for advanced wound dressings to aid in the treatment of such injuries. Promising options include bioactive electrospun scaffolds made from polymers with antimicrobial properties, which can prevent infections and promote faster healing. This study involved the creation of a nanofibrous scaffold using the electrospinning technique, which consisted of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), alginate (Alg), and Dragon's blood (DB). The scaffold was then analyzed for both its morphology and chemical composition. Results indicated that the DB was present in the nanofibrous scaffold, which had a uniform and unbranched appearance with fibers measuring approximately 300–400 nm in diameter. Additionally, mechanical property testing revealed promising results that fall within the range of human skin. The scaffold's wound healing potential was evaluated through various measurements, including water contact angle, drug release, water vapor permeability, blood compatibility, blood clotting index, and antibacterial activity. Results from an in vivo study on burn wounds showed that scaffolds containing 20% DB exhibited excellent wound healing ability with 80.3% wound closure after 21 days. This was attributed to the highest collagen synthesis, re‐epithelization and remodeling of the burned skin. Therefore, PVA/Alg/DB nanofibrous scaffolds hold promise as a wound dressing to treat burn injuries.
Q2

Synthesis and Characterization of Bioactive Glass via CTAB Modified Sol‐Gel Method for In Vitro Biological Activities
Bakare F.F., Ewente B.G., Akililu T.C., Jara A.D., Gonfa G.M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTBone defect repair methods have significant drawbacks and limitations. The discovery and development of bioactive glasses (BGs) have greatly advanced the treatment of bone diseases. BGs can uniquely bond to living tissues, including bone, due to the formation of a hydroxyapatite (HAp) layer on their surface. These glasses synthesized using various catalysts and structure‐directing agents to enhance their biological activities. However, most catalysts generate toxicity, alter pH levels, and work at high concentrations. Similarly, many surfactants have limited surface areas, poor capacity to create well‐defined mesoporous structures, and potential toxicity, reducing the bioactivity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability of the BGs. To address these issues, this study evaluates a bioactive glass synthesized via the sol–gel process, using low concentration CTAB as a structure‐directing agent and citric acid as a catalyst. The phase composition, surface morphology, specific surface area, inner structure, crystal structure, elemental composition, and functional groups of the samples were characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Fourier‐transform infrared microscopy (FTIR) techniques, respectively. The in vitro bioactivity was tested by soaking samples in simulated body fluid and analyzing the HAp layer formation using XRD, SEM, and FTIR. In addition, the in vitro biocompatibility, and an in vitro biodegradability were measured. 0.3 M of CTAB (BG3) exhibited a larger specific surface area with spherical‐shaped particles and pore volume with a mesoporous structure results better in bioactivity and biodegradability. Furthermore, all samples exhibited cell viability above 70%, indicating that the prepared materials are biocompatible. The findings highlight the potential of CTAB‐modified BGs for biomedical applications, especially in bone repair and regeneration.
Q2

Are All Alginate Dressings Equivalent?
Duciel L., Proust R., Ponsen A., Ziarelli F., Coudreuse A., Jeanmichel L., Samardzic M., Uzan G., Courtils C.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAlginate dressings are widely used in wound treatment for their healing and hemostatic properties and their capacity to drain exudate. However, a clear understanding of the heterogeneity within this class of dressings is lacking. Numerous sources of variability exist between alginate dressings: their composition (% of calcium alginate relative to other components), the ratio of D‐Mannuronic and L‐Guluronic acids in the alginate fraction, their purity (presence of toxic contaminants), and the shape of their fibers (surface and thickness). These parameters affect the performance and safety of alginate dressings, which may thus not be interchangeable in clinical practice. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of these differences to ensure optimal treatment and avoid complications or suboptimal healing. The objective of this study was to compare six alginate dressings to conclude or not on their equivalence. The results obtained demonstrate considerable variability between alginate dressings in the assessed characteristics: composition, Ca2+ release, level of cytotoxicity, fiber shape, draining capacity, and their resistance to traction. Algostéril, the only pure calcium alginate rich in G, releases a specific dose of Ca2+ and is the only non‐cytotoxic dressing. With its multilobed fibers that are statistically the thickest, it provides the best draining capacity and greatest resistance to traction. These results demonstrate that alginate dressings are not equivalent. Each dressing is distinct, and consequently the clinical performance of one cannot be transposed to the others. Therefore, each alginate dressing should demonstrate its own efficacy, in a given indication, through a clinical trial.
Q2

Vitamin D Screening and Supplementation—A Novel Approach to Higher Success: An Update and Review of the Current Literature
Wiedemann T.G., Jin H.W., Gallagher B., Witek L., Miron R.J., Talib H.S.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTIn recognizing the critical role of vitamin D in bone metabolism and osseointegration, research aims to identify whether preoperative vitamin D deficiency serves as a risk factor for early implant failure. By analyzing patient outcomes and their serum vitamin D levels, studies seek to establish evidence‐based recommendations for vitamin D assessment and management in the preoperative period, with the ultimate goal of enhancing implant success rates and patient outcomes in dental implantology. Given these insights, it is important for clinicians to incorporate the preoperative evaluation of vitamin D serum levels into their standard protocol for patients undergoing dental implant procedures. The objective of this study is to review and investigate the correlation between early dental implant failure (EDIF) and reduced serum levels of vitamin D, and to evaluate the potential benefits of preoperative screening and supplementation of vitamin D in patients undergoing dental implant surgery. A literature review was performed using a selected database—PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and SCOPUS—to assess the effect of vitamin D3 level on EDIF and biological factors (i.e., peri‐implant bone level). Studies were limited to peer‐reviewed, indexed journals. Subsequently, a hypothesis was proposed that vitamin D3 supplementation would mitigate the negative effect of vitamin D3 deficiency. The potential benefit of vitamin D3 supplementation—systemic and topical—was assessed in terms of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and peri‐implant bone level. The deleterious effects of low vitamin D serum levels on osseointegration of dental implants and immune system modulation are increasingly accepted. Evidence has displayed that deficiency of this vitamin can result in impaired peri‐implant bone formation. Vitamin D deficiency resulted in nearly a fourfold increase in overall EDIF incidence. Presurgical supplementation of vitamin D3 demonstrated increased levels of implant osseointegration, increased bone–implant contact, enhanced bone level maintenance, and decreased EDIF even in at‐risk demographics (i.e., diabetic subjects). The findings of this study reinforce the role of vitamin D in dental implant osseointegration. Our study, particularly, emphasizes the necessity of vitamin D supplementation for individuals with sub‐physiologic vitamin D serum levels (≤ 30 ng/mL) and those within specific risk categories: smokers, diabetics, obese individuals, and those with compromised immune systems. Adopting a proactive management plan, including screening and supplementation in these patients, may substantially enhance the clinical outcomes in dental implant surgery.
Q2

Effect of Microporous Surface Zirconia on Mechanical Properties and Biological Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts
Zhang L., He L., Wang X., Hu J., Jiang Q.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAs a commonly used material in prosthodontics, zirconia has garnered widespread attention. Addressing the shortcomings of existing zirconia materials, this study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of microporous surface zirconia ceramics and their impact on the biological behavior of human gingival cells. Microporous surface zirconia was developed using a novel ceramic plasticity process, sintered at 1460°C for densification. The surface morphology and composition were determined through scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectrometer. Surface roughness was measured using atomic force microscopy, hydrophilicity angle was determined using a contact angle measurement instrument, and X‐ray diffractometer assessed the crystalline phase content before and after aging. Material flexural strength was determined using a universal testing machine. The influence of microporous surface zirconia on the adhesion and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) was investigated through CCK‐8 and immunofluorescence staining for Integrin β1 and F‐actin. The pore structure of microporous surface zirconia (MZ) group is uniform, with a flexural strength of 1375.86 ± 76.97 MPa, significantly higher than the control (Cont) group (p < 0.05). The percentage of HGFs adhesion to the MZ group was markedly higher than the Cont group (p < 0.05). Fluorescence of Integrin β1 and F‐actin in the MZ group was significantly higher than in the Cont group. In conclusion, Microporous surface zirconia promotes the attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts, facilitating early closure of soft tissues.
Q2

In Vivo Evaluation of Thermally Drawn Biodegradable Optical Fibers as Brain Implants
Abdollahian P., Sui K., Li G., Wang J., Zhang C., Wang Y., Berg R.W., Meneghetti M., Markos C.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTOptical fiber technology plays a critical role in modern neuroscience towards understanding the complex neuronal dynamics within the nervous system. In this study, we manufactured and characterized amorphous thermally drawn poly D, L‐lactic acid (PDLLA) biodegradable optical fibers in different diameters. These optical fibers were then implanted into the lateral posterior region of the mouse brain for four months, allowing us to assess their degradation characteristics. The gradual dissolution of the implanted PDLLA optical fibers in the brain was confirmed by optical, photoacoustic, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), light propagation characteristics, and molecular weight measurements. The results indicate that the degradation rate of the biodegradable optical fiber was mainly pronounced during the first week. After four months, degradation led to the formation of micropores on the surface of the implanted fiber within the gray matter region of the brain. We believe that the PDLLA biodegradable optical fiber developed in this study constitutes a promising candidate for further functionalization and development of next‐generation biocompatible, soft, and biodegradable bi‐directional neural interfaces.
Q2

Utilization of Bulk RNA Sequencing for the Evaluation of Keratin Nanomaterials as a Coating for Percutaneous Devices
Miller A., Beck J.P., White A., Agarwal J., Bachus K.N., Jeyapalina S., Van Dyke M.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite advances in the design and protocols for maintaining the skin/device interface around percutaneous devices (PDs), no current strategy ensures the permanent attachment of peri‐implant epithelial tissue to the device surface. Based on preliminary data, we hypothesized that PDs coated with keratin nanomaterials, resembling the fingernail‐nailbed interface, could provide a biochemically mediated surface that enhances epidermal cell adhesion and differentiation. To test this hypothesis, 15 Yucatan miniature pigs were each implanted with six percutaneous titanium devices, comprising three porous and three smooth devices, both with and without keratin coatings (Kerateine [iKNT] and Keratose [gKOS]). The pigs were sacrificed at 4, 8, and 16 weeks post‐implantation. The devices and surrounding tissues were harvested and analyzed using histological and RNA sequencing techniques. Compared to smooth peri‐implant tissue, porous peri‐implant tissue showed a significant decrease in epithelial downgrowth, fibrous capsule thickness, and infection rates, alongside a significant upregulation of multiple immune marker genes, including IL12B. At the 16‐week period, gKOS‐coated surfaces demonstrated a more favorable wound healing response than iKTN‐coated devices, with a reduction in granulation tissue area and a significant upregulation of several keratin genes related to differentiation. Among the combinations of surface types and coatings studied, the porous gKOS‐coated device produced the most favorable wound healing response.
Q2

Process‐Dependent Variations in the Proliferation of Myoblasts, Fibroblasts and Chondrocytes on Laser‐Sintered Polypropylene
Detsch R., Schlicht S., Nawaz Q., Boccaccini A.R., Drummer D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTAdditively manufactured polyolefins find broad applications in medical engineering, enabling the manufacturing of patient‐specific geometries. For investigating the influence of processing conditions of laser sintered locally macroporous polypropylene substrates, the response of myoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts has been characterized in this study. An influence of the applied manufacturing parameters on the attachment and viability of the investigated cells is observed, showing the effect of the superficial pore topology on the attachment and the spreading of cells. The viability and attachment of fibroblasts and chondrocytes could be improved by reducing the thermal exposure during the processing step of the dense base part, associated with increased superficial porosity and the corresponding increase of the surface area. The applied additive manufacturing process of macroporous structures influences emerging cell morphologies, leading to an extended morphological expression of chondrocytes and the overgrowth of small pores by fibroblasts. This indicates an improvement in superficial cell adhesion due to larger pores. These findings indicate the significance of the processing conditions in laser sintering of polypropylene on the cell response through the optimization of processing parameters and the attachment of an open‐cell pore structure.
Q2

Gold Nanorods (GNRs ): A Golden Nano Compass to Navigate Breast Cancer by Multimodal Imaging Approaches
Varma S., Bamb A.L., Haldar N., Gajbhiye V., Amalnerkar D., Chaudhari B.P.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTThe ongoing rise in the incidences of breast cancer cases has concerned medical and scientific personnel around the world. Adequate treatment of cancer predominantly relies on the pertinent diagnosis of the type of cancer as well as other molecular and cellular details at the initial stage only. Surprisingly, up till now, there is no single, self‐reliant imaging modality that helps to systematically find out the anatomical and functional events taking place inside the body. This resulted in the advent of the multimodal imaging concept, which encompasses the integration of complementary imaging modalities by designing multimodal imaging probes. Gold nanorods (GNRs) are extremely popular and effective nanoparticles for multimodal bioimaging due to their unique properties. Researchers have designed varieties of stable and biocompatible GNR‐based probes for targeted and nontargeted multimodal imaging of breast cancer. However, there is a lack of investigations on the in vivo fate and the toxicity of GNRs. Thus, their preclinical to clinical translation can be attained by comprehensively determining the in vivo fate and toxicity of GNRs. The review provides details about the GNRs‐based nanoprobes fabricated so far for breast cancer imaging, which, by consequent studies, can be taken up to clinical usage.
Q2

Effects of Nitrogen and Hydrogen Plasma Treatments on a Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn Resorbable Alloy
Shekargoftar M., Ravanbakhsh S., de Oliveira V.S., Paternoster C., Chevallier P., Witte F., Sarkissian A., Mantovani D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTMg alloys have recently been investigated and optimized for the development of biodegradable implants for orthopedic, dental, vascular, and other applications. However, their rapid degradation in a physiological environment remains the main obstacle to their development. In this work, the effects of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatments on the surface properties and corrosion behavior of an Mg‐2Y‐1Zn‐1Mn (WZM211) alloy were investigated. Plasma treatment effectively modified the surface of a WZM211 alloy by removing the original oxide layer, followed by the formation of a new surface layer with controlled composition, thickness, and wettability. The water contact angle decreased from 100° to 17° after nitrogen plasma and to 45° after hydrogen plasma treatment. The nitrogen plasma treatment, shortly N‐Plasma, resulted in the lowest corrosion rate (CRN = 0.038 ± 0.010 mm/y) if compared with the hydrogen plasma treatment, shortly H‐Plasma (CRH = 0.044 ± 0.003 mm/y) and untreated samples (0.233 ± 0.097 mm/y). The results demonstrate the potential of nitrogen and hydrogen plasma treatment for the development of resorbable Mg‐based implants.
Q2

Physicochemical Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid‐Methylcellulose Semi‐Gels for Mitochondria Transplantation
Ahmed A.J., Gallegos Z.A., Dinar M.A., Sullivan P.G., DeRouchey J.E., Patel S.P., Rabchevsky A.G., Dziubla T.D.
Q2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
|
Abstract

ABSTRACTTraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) presents a significant medical challenge due to its intricate nature and treatment complexities. SCI can cause physical impairments by affecting neural and motor functions as well as initiating a series of pathophysiological events exacerbating the initial trauma. Leakage from ruptured neurons and vessels disrupt ionic balance and induces excitotoxicity, leading to progressive cellular degeneration. Introducing mitochondria to the SCI lesion has shown potential in attenuating secondary injury. Mitochondria transplantation improves cellular bioenergetics and reduces concentration of reactive oxygen species achieving homeostasis and neuroprotection. Nonetheless, keeping mitochondria viable outside cell environment for a time longer than a few minutes proves to be challenging. Additionally, localized delivery to the injury site has also been limited by other factors including flow rate of cerebrospinal fluid that washes away mobilized organelle from the compromised tissue site. Previously we showed that using hyaluronic acid‐methylcellulose semi‐gels (HAMC) as a biocompatible, erodible thermogelling delivery vehicle helped to overcome some of these challenges. HAMC allows for controlled release at and around the injury site, utilizing the reverse thermogelling property of MC. Sustained release of mitochondria at slower rate can increase their uptake in spinal tissue. To better optimize the semi‐gel delivery of mitochondria requires a more complete understanding of the physicochemical properties of the HAMC semi‐gels. We have used ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy to measure optical density of HAMC semi‐gels for different HA to MC ratios and examine the temperature dependent gelation properties above their low critical solution temperature (LCST). The viscosity and degree of crystallinity of the resulting HAMC semi‐gels were also assessed. Semi‐gel erosion and mitochondrial release over time were studied using a fluorescence microplate reader. Lastly, seahorse assay was used to study released mitochondria respiration and viability after incubation in HAMC semi‐gel.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
564 citations, 3.84%
|
|
BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine
464 citations, 3.16%
|
|
British Journal of Sports Medicine
346 citations, 2.36%
|
|
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
219 citations, 1.49%
|
|
PLoS ONE
217 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Sports Medicine
175 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Physical Therapy in Sport
172 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Sports
160 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
146 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Nutrients
145 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
138 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Scientific Reports
133 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
132 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Sports Medicine - Open
128 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
115 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
115 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
113 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Sports Sciences
110 citations, 0.75%
|
|
BMC Public Health
109 citations, 0.74%
|
|
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
100 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
97 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
95 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Healthcare
94 citations, 0.64%
|
|
BMJ Open
92 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Physician and Sportsmedicine
92 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Sensors
90 citations, 0.61%
|
|
American Journal of Sports Medicine
84 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
84 citations, 0.57%
|
|
European Journal of Sport Science
83 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Sports Health
77 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Cureus
77 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
76 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Science and Medicine in Football
76 citations, 0.52%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching
73 citations, 0.5%
|
|
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
67 citations, 0.46%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
64 citations, 0.44%
|
|
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
63 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
59 citations, 0.4%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Medicine
57 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
55 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
55 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Sport Sciences for Health
53 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Sustainability
53 citations, 0.36%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
50 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
49 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
47 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Current Sports Medicine Reports
46 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Strength and Conditioning Journal
45 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal de Traumatologie du Sport
45 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Medicina
45 citations, 0.31%
|
|
European Journal of Applied Physiology
45 citations, 0.31%
|
|
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
43 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
42 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Research in Sports Medicine
42 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
42 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
36 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMJ Military Health
36 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Children
35 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Brain Injury
34 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
34 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Military Medicine
33 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Sports Biomechanics
32 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Pediatrics
31 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Diagnostics
30 citations, 0.2%
|
|
PeerJ
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Sport and Health Science
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Athletic Training
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Preventive Medicine Reports
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
F1000Research
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Injury Prevention
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Translational Sports Medicine
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinics in Sports Medicine
25 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
25 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
25 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
23 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Heliyon
23 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sports Medicine and Health Science
23 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
21 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
21 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
21 citations, 0.14%
|
|
JSAMS Plus
21 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Neurotrauma
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
20 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science and Sports
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PM and R
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Springer Nature
2256 citations, 15.36%
|
|
Elsevier
2209 citations, 15.04%
|
|
MDPI
1913 citations, 13.03%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1072 citations, 7.3%
|
|
BMJ
1070 citations, 7.29%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
850 citations, 5.79%
|
|
Wiley
687 citations, 4.68%
|
|
SAGE
685 citations, 4.66%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
590 citations, 4.02%
|
|
Human Kinetics
311 citations, 2.12%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
239 citations, 1.63%
|
|
JMIR Publications
211 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
173 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Oxford University Press
162 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
117 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
103 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
86 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
57 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
50 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
42 citations, 0.29%
|
|
IOS Press
40 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Sports Physical Therapy Section
37 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
34 citations, 0.23%
|
|
F1000 Research
33 citations, 0.22%
|
|
SciELO
32 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Physiological Society
31 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PeerJ
30 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
30 citations, 0.2%
|
|
National Athletic Trainers Association, Inc.
30 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
30 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Association of Military Surgeons of the US
28 citations, 0.19%
|
|
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IGI Global
27 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
26 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Emerald
25 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
23 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IntechOpen
22 citations, 0.15%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
19 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
18 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
18 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Academy of Physical Education
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Medknow
15 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
12 citations, 0.08%
|
|
EDP Sciences
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Wales Institute, Cardiff
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AOSIS
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Alliance of Medicine and Sports - Healthy Generation
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Faculty of Uludag University
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
J.Michael Ryan Publishing Inc.
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bioscientifica
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SLACK
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Index Copernicus
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
S. Karger AG
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Society of Sports Medicine
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Epidemiological Association
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gazi University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Australian Physiotherapy Association
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Occupational Health
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
68 publications, 5.67%
|
|
University of Cape Town
40 publications, 3.34%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
37 publications, 3.09%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
34 publications, 2.84%
|
|
University of Sydney
29 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Bath
29 publications, 2.42%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
28 publications, 2.34%
|
|
Linköping University
26 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Deakin University
26 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
25 publications, 2.09%
|
|
ASPETAR - Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
23 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Pretoria
23 publications, 1.92%
|
|
McMaster University
23 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
22 publications, 1.83%
|
|
University of Melbourne
22 publications, 1.83%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
20 publications, 1.67%
|
|
University College London
19 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
19 publications, 1.58%
|
|
La Trobe University
19 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Harvard University
19 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
18 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
18 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
18 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Loughborough University
18 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Lund University
17 publications, 1.42%
|
|
University of Birmingham
17 publications, 1.42%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Imperial College London
15 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
15 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Zurich
14 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
14 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Keele University
14 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Exeter
14 publications, 1.17%
|
|
University of Queensland
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Federation University
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Oxford
12 publications, 1%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
12 publications, 1%
|
|
Monash University
12 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Calgary
12 publications, 1%
|
|
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
King's College London
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Glasgow
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Stanford University
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Waseda University
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Ulster
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Balgrist University Hospital
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Oslo
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Washington
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Coventry University
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Umeå University
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Dundee
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Agder
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of South Australia
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University College Dublin
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Halmstad University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Basel
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Nottingham
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Otago
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Griffith University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Dublin City University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Michigan
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Cardiff Metropolitan University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Cardiff University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Bern
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Cambridge
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Maastricht University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Manchester
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
St Olav's University Hospital
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Western University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Alberta
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Delaware
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University College Cork (National University of Ireland, Cork)
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of New England
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Durham University
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Aalborg University
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Kuopio University Hospital
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bergen
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
56 publications, 7.59%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
29 publications, 3.93%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
26 publications, 3.52%
|
|
Linköping University
24 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Deakin University
23 publications, 3.12%
|
|
University of Pretoria
22 publications, 2.98%
|
|
University of Bath
22 publications, 2.98%
|
|
University of Cape Town
21 publications, 2.85%
|
|
University of Sydney
20 publications, 2.71%
|
|
University of Melbourne
19 publications, 2.57%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
19 publications, 2.57%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
18 publications, 2.44%
|
|
McMaster University
18 publications, 2.44%
|
|
La Trobe University
17 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
17 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Harvard University
16 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
14 publications, 1.9%
|
|
Liverpool John Moores University
14 publications, 1.9%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
14 publications, 1.9%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
14 publications, 1.9%
|
|
Lund University
13 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
13 publications, 1.76%
|
|
ASPETAR - Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Zurich
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University College London
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Loughborough University
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
12 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Birmingham
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Stanford University
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
11 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
10 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Monash University
10 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
10 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Balgrist University Hospital
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Keele University
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Waseda University
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Ulster
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Coventry University
9 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Imperial College London
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Oxford
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Queensland
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Calgary
8 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Bern
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Basel
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Oslo
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Glasgow
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Griffith University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Western University
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Exeter
7 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Agder
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of South Australia
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Washington
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Dublin City University
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Delaware
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University College Dublin
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University College Cork (National University of Ireland, Cork)
6 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Umeå University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Halmstad University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Maastricht University
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Nottingham
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Auckland
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of New England
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
5 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Ankara University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Ghent University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tampere University Hospital
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tampere University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Helsinki
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Durham University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Dundee
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Bergen
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
King's College London
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
4 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 307, 25.6%
United Kingdom
307 publications, 25.6%
|
USA
|
USA, 234, 19.52%
USA
234 publications, 19.52%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 164, 13.68%
Australia
164 publications, 13.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 125, 10.43%
Netherlands
125 publications, 10.43%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 102, 8.51%
Canada
102 publications, 8.51%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 88, 7.34%
Sweden
88 publications, 7.34%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 75, 6.26%
South Africa
75 publications, 6.26%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 67, 5.59%
Norway
67 publications, 5.59%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 62, 5.17%
Germany
62 publications, 5.17%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 46, 3.84%
Switzerland
46 publications, 3.84%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 44, 3.67%
Denmark
44 publications, 3.67%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 44, 3.67%
Ireland
44 publications, 3.67%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 41, 3.42%
Italy
41 publications, 3.42%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 37, 3.09%
Japan
37 publications, 3.09%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 36, 3%
New Zealand
36 publications, 3%
|
France
|
France, 34, 2.84%
France
34 publications, 2.84%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 32, 2.67%
Brazil
32 publications, 2.67%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 30, 2.5%
Spain
30 publications, 2.5%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 30, 2.5%
Finland
30 publications, 2.5%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 27, 2.25%
Qatar
27 publications, 2.25%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 18, 1.5%
Belgium
18 publications, 1.5%
|
China
|
China, 15, 1.25%
China
15 publications, 1.25%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 13, 1.08%
Iraq
13 publications, 1.08%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 0.92%
Turkey
11 publications, 0.92%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 10, 0.83%
Austria
10 publications, 0.83%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 0.83%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 0.83%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 0.75%
Portugal
9 publications, 0.75%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 0.58%
Argentina
7 publications, 0.58%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.58%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.58%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.5%
Iran
6 publications, 0.5%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 0.5%
Lebanon
6 publications, 0.5%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.5%
UAE
6 publications, 0.5%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.42%
India
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 5, 0.42%
Kenya
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 5, 0.42%
Costa Rica
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.33%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.33%
Greece
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.33%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.33%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.33%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.33%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 4, 0.33%
Serbia
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.25%
Russia
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.25%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.25%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 3, 0.25%
Cameroon
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.25%
Poland
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.25%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.17%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.17%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 2, 0.17%
Panama
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.17%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 2, 0.17%
Faroe Islands
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.17%
Chile
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.17%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.08%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.08%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.08%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.08%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.08%
Israel
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.08%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.08%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.08%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.08%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.08%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.08%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.08%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.08%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.08%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.08%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Show all (40 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 181, 24.53%
United Kingdom
181 publications, 24.53%
|
USA
|
USA, 145, 19.65%
USA
145 publications, 19.65%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 117, 15.85%
Australia
117 publications, 15.85%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 93, 12.6%
Netherlands
93 publications, 12.6%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 64, 8.67%
Canada
64 publications, 8.67%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 58, 7.86%
Sweden
58 publications, 7.86%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 55, 7.45%
South Africa
55 publications, 7.45%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 45, 6.1%
Germany
45 publications, 6.1%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 40, 5.42%
Norway
40 publications, 5.42%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 35, 4.74%
Switzerland
35 publications, 4.74%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 31, 4.2%
Ireland
31 publications, 4.2%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 29, 3.93%
New Zealand
29 publications, 3.93%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 28, 3.79%
Denmark
28 publications, 3.79%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 27, 3.66%
Italy
27 publications, 3.66%
|
France
|
France, 24, 3.25%
France
24 publications, 3.25%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 24, 3.25%
Japan
24 publications, 3.25%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 22, 2.98%
Spain
22 publications, 2.98%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 20, 2.71%
Finland
20 publications, 2.71%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 18, 2.44%
Brazil
18 publications, 2.44%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 14, 1.9%
Belgium
14 publications, 1.9%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 13, 1.76%
Qatar
13 publications, 1.76%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 9, 1.22%
Austria
9 publications, 1.22%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 1.22%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 1.22%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 8, 1.08%
Iraq
8 publications, 1.08%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 1.08%
Turkey
8 publications, 1.08%
|
China
|
China, 6, 0.81%
China
6 publications, 0.81%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.81%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.81%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.68%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.68%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.68%
Iran
5 publications, 0.68%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.68%
UAE
5 publications, 0.68%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.54%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.54%
Greece
4 publications, 0.54%
|
India
|
India, 4, 0.54%
India
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 4, 0.54%
Costa Rica
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.54%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.54%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.54%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.41%
Russia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.41%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.41%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 3, 0.41%
Cameroon
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.41%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.41%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.41%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.41%
Poland
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.41%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.27%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.27%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.27%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.27%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 2, 0.27%
Faroe Islands
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.27%
Chile
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.27%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.27%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.14%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.14%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.14%
Israel
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.14%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.14%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.14%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.14%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.14%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.14%
Panama
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.14%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.14%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.14%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.14%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.14%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.14%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Show all (37 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
2 profile journal articles
Owen Patrick

Deakin University
123 publications,
1 347 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Ding Ding

University of Sydney
278 publications,
12 430 citations
h-index: 48
1 profile journal article
Rouyard Thomas
14 publications,
109 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
ARBELO ELENA
🥼
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
250 publications,
35 174 citations
h-index: 55
1 profile journal article
Svitlana Drozdovska
22 publications,
191 citations
h-index: 6