Journal of Aging and Social Policy
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
Impact factor
2
SJR
1.365
CiteScore
13.0
Categories
Demography
Gerontology
Life-span and Life-course Studies
Areas
Nursing
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1989-2025
journal names
Journal of Aging and Social Policy
J AGING SOC POLICY
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Aging and Social Policy
(709 citations)

The Gerontologist
(307 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Brown University
(33 publications)

University of Minnesota
(32 publications)

University of California, San Francisco
(22 publications)

Brown University
(15 publications)

Miami University
(12 publications)

University of Minnesota
(11 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 15242

A Pilot Study of Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy after Autologous Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Shea L., Watkins M.P., Wan F., Cashen A.F., Wagner-Johnston N.D., Jacoby M.A., Abboud C.N., Dipersio J.F., Hurd D.D., Jaglowski S.M., Bartlett N.L., Fehniger T.A.
For patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), salvage chemotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the standard of care. Even with this aggressive treatment strategy, 5-year progression-free survival is ≤50%, and there remains interest in maintenance strategies to improve long-term disease-free survival. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with demonstrated activity in multiple subtypes of lymphoma including cHL, and has also been shown to improve both progression-free and overall survival as maintenance therapy after ASCT in multiple myeloma. This multicenter study evaluated maintenance lenalidomide after ASCT for patients with cHL. Patients were enrolled 60 to 90 days post-transplant and received oral lenalidomide on days 1 to 28 of 28-day cycles for a maximum of 18 cycles. Lenalidomide was started at 15 mg daily and increased to maximum of 25 mg daily if tolerated. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this regimen, with a goal

Early Mixed Lymphoid Donor/Host Chimerism is Associated with Improved Transplant Outcome in Patients with Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis
Deeg H.J., Salit R.B., Monahan T., Schoch G., McFarland C., Scott B.L., Storer B.E.
We investigated risk factors for the development of mixed chimerism in 131 patients who underwent transplantation for myelofibrosis and determined the impact of lymphoid (CD3+) and myeloid (CD33+) chimerism on transplant outcome. Disease risk included DIPSS plus categories low to high. The median patient age was 58 years. Patients were conditioned with high-intensity (myeloablative) or low/reduced-intensity (nonmyeloablative) regimens and received a transplant from a related or unrelated donor. Mixed CD3+ chimerism was observed earlier after HCT, whereas CD33+ chimerism occurred later. Mixed chimerism was more frequent with low-intensity regimens than with high- intensity regimens. Mixed CD3+ chimerism did not lead to graft failure and was associated with a reduced incidence of acute GVHD and improved overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival, whereas mixed CD33+ chimerism was associated with an increased incidence of relapse and reduced OS and relapse-free survival, independent of the CD34+ cell dose transplanted. Thus, mixed CD3+ chimerism in patients with myelofibrosis had a favorable impact on transplantation outcome and does not require therapeutic interventions.

Incidence and Outcome of Late Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis
Atagunduz I.K., Christopeit M., Ayuk F., Zeck G., Wolschke C., Kröger N.
In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (P = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.

Individuals, Boundaries, and Graft-versus-Host Disease
Deeg H.J.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation generates new individuals, transplant chimeras, composed of 2 genetic partners—the patient and donor-derived cells—no longer restricted by their original genomes. Interactions of donor-derived and recipient cells occur prominently at the boundary of the recipient with a third partner, the microbiome, in particular skin and intestinal tract, leading to disruption of microbiome homeostasis. These interactions of donor and patient cells at the boundary set the stage for the development of graft-versus-host disease, an expression of the defense of individuality by recipient and donor. Establishment of tolerance and return of homeostasis at the boundary will allow for the survival of the new integrated, physiologic individual.

Outcomes with Autologous or Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Novel Agents
Lemieux C., Johnston L.J., Lowsky R., Muffly L.S., Craig J.K., Shiraz P., Rezvani A., Frank M.J., Weng W., Meyer E., Shizuru J., Arai S., Negrin R., Miklos D.B., Sidana S.
Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and very aggressive plasma cell disorder. The optimal treatment approach, including whether to pursue an autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not clear, given the lack of clinical trial-based evidence. This single-center retrospective study describes the outcomes of 16 patients with PCL (n = 14 with primary PCL) who underwent either autoSCT (n = 9) or alloSCT (n = 7) for PCL in the era of novel agents, between 2007 and 2019. The median age of the cohort was 58 years. High-risk cytogenetics were found in 50% of the patients. All patients received a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug-based regimen before transplantation. At the time of transplantation, 10 patients (62%) obtained at least a very good partial response (VGPR). The response after autoSCT (3 months) was at least a VGPR in 6 patients (67%; complete response [CR] in 5). All patients undergoing alloSCT achieved a CR at 3 months. Maintenance therapy was provided to 5 patients (56%) after autoSCT. The median progression-free survival after transplantation was 6 months in the autoSCT group, compared with 18 months in the alloSCT group (P = .09), and median overall survival (OS) after transplantation in the 2 groups was 19 months and 40 months, respectively (P = .41). The median OS from diagnosis was 27 months and 49 months, respectively (P = .50). Of the 11 deaths, 10 patients (91%) died of relapsed disease. AlloSCT was not observed to offer any significant survival advantage over autoSCT in PCL, in agreement with recent reports, and relapse remains the primary cause of death in these patients.

Guidelines for Cord Blood Unit Selection
Politikos I., Davis E., Nhaissi M., Wagner J.E., Brunstein C.G., Cohen S., Shpall E.J., Milano F., Scaradavou A., Barker J.N.
Optimal cord blood (CB) unit selection is critical to maximize the likelihood of successful engraftment and survival after CB transplantation (CBT). However, unit selection can be complex because multiple characteristics must be considered including unit cell dose, donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, and unit quality. This review provides evidence-based and experience-based comprehensive guidelines for CB unit selection. Topics addressed include the use of both the TNC and the CD34+ cell dose, as well as the CD34+ cell to TNC content ratio to evaluate unit progenitor cell content and engraftment potential, the acceptable TNC and CD34+ cell dose criteria that define an adequate single-unit graft, and the indication and acceptable cell dose criteria for double-unit grafts. The acceptable criteria for 6-loci (HLA-A, -B antigen, -DRB1 allele) and 8-allele (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) donor-recipient HLA match, the evaluation of patients with donor-specific HLA antibodies, and the multiple determinants of unit quality are also reviewed in detail. Finally, a practical step-by-step guide to CB searches and the principles that guide ultimate graft selection are outlined.

Table of Contents
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
,
2020
,
citations by CoLab: 0


Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience
Khurana A., Micallef I.N., LaPlant B.R., Patrick O’Neill B., Habermann T.M., Ansell S.M., Inwards D.J., Porrata L.F., Paludo J., Bisneto J.C., Johnston P.B.
A paucity of randomized phase III clinical trials in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has resulted in no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for consolidation and conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The past 2 decades have witnessed a preference for thiotepa (TT)-based conditioning regimens due to superior central nervous system penetration. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients with PCNSL who underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester over the past 2 decades, and the impact of TT-based conditioning regimens. Fifty-six patients underwent transplant for PCNSL, with 25 and 31 patients receiving BEAM (non-thiotepa) and carmustine (BCNU)/TT-based conditioning, respectively. All patients received high-dose methotrexate-based induction therapy. While the BCNU/TT group had higher risk disease features such as high International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score, elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein, and older patient population, there was no significant difference at 2 years post-transplant in progression-free survival (BEAM 68.0% [46.1% to 82.5%] versus BCNU/TT, 65.5% [45.2% to 79.8%], P = .99) or overall survival (OS) (84.0% [62.8% to 93.7%] in the BEAM group versus 81.6% [61.3% to 91.9%] in the BCNU/TT group, P = .95). Disease response status before transplant significantly affected the outcomes as those in complete remission had an OS at 2 years post-transplant of 94.7% (68.1% to 99.2%) in the BEAM group and 90.5% (67.0% to 97.5%) in the BCNU/TT group compared with those in partial response, 57.1% (17.2% to 83.7%) in BCNU/TT group and 50.0% (11.1% to 80.4%) in the BEAM group, respectively (P

Goal-Oriented Monitoring of Cyclosporine Is Effective for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia Major
Gauthier A., Bleyzac N., Garnier N., Kebaili K., Joly P., Goutagny M., Mollet I., Goutelle S., Renard C., Bertrand Y.
Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an important challenge and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Herein we report our institution's experience of goal-oriented Bayesian monitoring for cyclosporine (CsA) used alone as GVHD prophylaxis during the post-transplant period in pediatric patients with thalassemia major (TM) or sickle cell anemia (SCA) undergoing HLA-matched HSCT. We also studied evolution of chimerism. Twenty-six consecutive patients (SCA, 14; TM, 12) underwent matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT from 2004 to 2014. All patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of 20 mg/kg antithymocyte globulin in the conditioning regimens and then CsA alone in the post-transplant period. Target CsA trough blood concentration (TBC) was 150 ± 20 ng/mL. At last follow-up, all patients were alive and free of disease, even in cases of mixed chimerism. Engraftment occurred in all patients. No patient developed grades II to IV acute GVHD, 4 patients developed acute grade I skin GVHD, and only 1 presented with chronic pulmonary GVHD. A better control of GVHD and immunosuppression by a strict monitoring of CsA TBC as described herein is promising and could play a crucial role. Further investigations are required, but this study opens new perspectives to improve survival and safety of HSCT from alternative donors in TM and SCA to levels compatible with that obtained with MSDs.

Peritransplantation Use of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis
Ibrahim U., Petrone G.E., Mascarenhas J., Keyzner A.
Ruxolitinib is an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor that is approved for use in patients with intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) based on its proven spleen and symptom burden reduction. Its impact on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes is largely unknown, however. A significant number of patients proceeding to HSCT have been treated with ruxolitinib, and the specifics of its peritransplantation use vary widely in the published literature. Here we review the currently published data and experience to guide management of patients with MF on ruxolitinib proceeding to HSCT.

Real-World Issues and Potential Solutions in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Health Services and International Studies Committee
Algwaiz G., Aljurf M., Koh M., Horowitz M.M., Ljungman P., Weisdorf D., Saber W., Kodera Y., Szer J., Jawdat D., Wood W.A., Brazauskas R., Lehmann L., Pasquini M.C., Seber A., et. al.
ABSTRACT The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has impacted many facets of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in both developed and developing countries. Realizing the challenges as a result of this pandemic affecting the daily practice of the HCT centers and the recognition of the variability in practice worldwide, the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research's (CIBMTR) Health Services and International Studies Committee have jointly produced an expert opinion statement as a general guide to deal with certain aspects of HCT, including diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 in HCT recipient, pre- and post-HCT management, donor issues, medical tourism, and facilities management. During these crucial times, which may last for months or years, the HCT community must reorganize to proceed with transplantation activity in those patients who urgently require it, albeit with extreme caution. This shared knowledge may be of value to the HCT community in the absence of high-quality evidence-based medicine. © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan versus PG-Melphalan as Conditioning for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma
Monahan K., Kleman A., Thapa B., Szabo A., D'Souza A., Dhakal B., Jerkins J.H., Pasquini M.C., Hamadani M., Hari P.N., Chhabra S.
High-dose melphalan (Mel) conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is standard of care for patients with transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma. The traditional lyophilized Mel formulation has inadequate solubility and stability after reconstitution, leading to the use of propylene glycol (PG) as a solubilizing agent. A newer PG-free Mel preparation (Evomela) uses beta cyclodextrin captisol as a solubilizing agent and was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a conditioning agent based on a single-phase IIb study showing bioequivalence. We compared the outcomes of consecutive patients with myeloma undergoing autoHCT using the 2 formulations of Mel for conditioning as our center switched from using the older formulation (PG-Mel) to the newer one (PGF-Mel). Of 294 autoHCT recipients, 162 received PG-Mel conditioning and 132 received PGF-Mel conditioning. The PGF-Mel group was older and had a lower average Karnofsky Performance Status score. PGF-Mel was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (median, 12 days versus 13 days; P < .001), fewer grade 3-4 infections within 30 days of autoHCT (1.5% versus 8.0%; P = .048), and a lower 30-day rehospitalization rate (6.8% versus 17.9%; P = .04), as confirmed by propensity-weighted analysis. No significant between-group differences were detected in mucositis, organ toxicity, myeloma response, or 100-day mortality.

Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients
Bhargava D., Arora M., DeFor T.E., Brunstein C.G., Thyagarajan B., El Jurdi N., Holtan S.G., Rashidi A., Warlick E., Ramesh V., Rogosheske J., Bhatia S., Weisdorf D.J.
The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using Beers criteria and its impact on older allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients is not known. Here the use of any PIMs and their therapeutic classes in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HCT recipients were compared between older (≥65 years; n = 114) and younger (40 to 64 years; n = 240) patients during their initial HCT admission, defined as the number of days that a patient received 1 or more PIMs between day -14 and day +28. Poisson regression was used to determine rate ratios (RRs) in the 2 groups. In the ≥65 years group, we evaluated the impact of PIMs on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3-4 toxicities within 100 days and on overall mortality within 1 year post-HCT. The rate of any PIM use was similar in the older and younger groups (RR, .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .90 to 1.06; P = .65). In terms of PIM classes, the older group had a 48% higher rate of gastrointestinal (GI) medication use (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.65; P < .01) and a 25% higher rate of genitourinary (GU) medication use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.53; P = .03). Compared with males, females had a 19% higher rate of central nervous system (CNS) medication use (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.37; P = .02) and a 30% higher rate of benzodiazepine use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI. 1.09 to 1.54; P < .01). A high-risk HCT-CI was associated with a higher rate of use of any PIMs (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.26; P = .02), CNS medications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.53; P = .02) and GU medications (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.94; P = .01). Compared with matched sibling donor HCT recipients, umbilical cord blood transplantation recipients had higher rates of GI medication use (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.53; P < .01) and anticholinergic medication use (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.61; P = .01). In the ≥65 years group, increasing duration of narcotic use was associated with a 1.3-fold (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.7; P = .05) higher risk of overall mortality and a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.69) greater odds of CTCAE grade 3-4 toxicities (P = .04). Our data show that older recipients (≥65 years) were as likely as their younger counterparts to receive PIMs. Among older recipients, the use of PIMs, particularly narcotics, was associated with higher mortality and higher incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities. Identifying and reducing the use of PIMs in older HCT recipients may help decrease the burden of adverse events and associated health care costs.

Clinical and Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Transplant Delirium
Smith P., Thompson J.C., Perea E., Wasserman B., Bohannon L., Racioppi A., Choi T., Gasparetto C., Horwitz M.E., Long G., Lopez R., Rizzieri D.A., Sarantopoulos S., Sullivan K.M., Chao N.J., et. al.
Delirium is common among adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), although the clinical and neuroimaging correlates of post-HCT delirium have not been adequately delineated. We therefore examined the frequency of delirium and neuroimaging correlates of post-transplant delirium in a retrospective cohort of 115 adults undergoing neuroimaging after allogeneic HCT. Delirium was established using previously validated methods for retrospective identification of chart-assessed postprocedural delirium. Chart reviews were independently conducted by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in HCT, psychiatry, and psychology on consecutive allogeneic HCT patients who underwent neuroimaging assessments and transplantation at a single center between January 2009 and December 2016. Neuroimaging markers of white matter damage and brain volume loss were also recorded. In total, 115 patients were included, ranging in age from 20 to 74 years (mean [SD] age, 49 [13]). Fifty-three patients (46%) developed post-HCT delirium. In an adjusted model, delirium incidence was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.92 [1.28, 2.87] per decade, P = .002), greater severity of white matter hyperintensities (OR, 1.95 [1.06, 3.57], P = .031), and conditioning intensity (OR, 6.37 [2.20, 18.45], P < .001) but was unrelated to cortical atrophy (P = .777). Delirium was associated with fewer hospital-free days (P = .023) but was not associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.95 [0.56, 1.61], P = .844). Greater incidence of delirium following HCT was associated with greater age, microvascular burden, and conditioning intensity. Pre-HCT consideration of microvascular burden and other neuroimaging biomarkers of risk may be warranted.

Predicting Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: Performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and Development of a New Prognostic Model
Hernández-Boluda J., Pereira A., Alvarez-Larran A., Martín A., Benzaquen A., Aguirre L., Mora E., González P., Mora J., Dorado N., Sampol A., García-Gutiérrez V., López-Godino O., Fox M., Reguera J.L., et. al.
Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Journal of Aging and Social Policy
709 citations, 5.77%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
318 citations, 2.59%
|
|
The Gerontologist
307 citations, 2.5%
|
|
Journal of Applied Gerontology
230 citations, 1.87%
|
|
Ageing and Society
225 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
165 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Journal of Gerontological Social Work
136 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
135 citations, 1.1%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
134 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Journal of Aging Studies
132 citations, 1.07%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
127 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Canadian Journal on Aging
114 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
113 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
109 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Research on Aging
98 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Sustainability
95 citations, 0.77%
|
|
PLoS ONE
87 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Health and Social Care in the Community
86 citations, 0.7%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
78 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Aging and Mental Health
78 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Geriatric Nursing
72 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Aging and Health
69 citations, 0.56%
|
|
European Journal of Ageing
63 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
61 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Perspectives on Aging
61 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Healthcare
58 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Housing for the Elderly
53 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Ageing International
52 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Home Health Care Services Quarterly
51 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Australasian Journal on Ageing
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Public Policy & Aging Report
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Educational Gerontology
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
International Journal of Aging and Human Development
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Health Services Research
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
BMJ Open
42 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
41 citations, 0.33%
|
|
BMC Public Health
41 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Health Affairs
40 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Innovation in Aging
40 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Population Ageing
35 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Medical Care Research and Review
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Nursing
33 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Work, Aging and Retirement
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinical Gerontologist
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Geriatrics (Switzerland)
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Gerontological Nursing
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Psychogeriatrics
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Social Service Research
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Social Welfare
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Dementia
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Health Policy
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cities
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Medical Care
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Inquiry (United States)
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Social Policy and Administration
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
JMIR Aging
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geriatrics and Gerontology International
25 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
24 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Women and Aging
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Social Issues
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
State and Local Government Review
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Aging and Environment
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Social Work in Public Health
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Intergenerational Relationships
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Age and Ageing
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Activities, Adaptation and Aging
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Journal of Social Work
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal for Equity in Health
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Social Work
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of the Economics of Ageing
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Gerontology and Geriatrics Education
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Nursing
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SAGE Open
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal Of Care And Caring
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Health Planning and Management
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Social Security Review
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Milbank Quarterly
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Retraite et Societe
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Working with Older People
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Aging clinical and experimental research
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Family Issues
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Housing and Society
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Policy and Society
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Palliative Medicine
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2120 citations, 17.25%
|
|
Springer Nature
1424 citations, 11.58%
|
|
Elsevier
1385 citations, 11.27%
|
|
SAGE
1248 citations, 10.15%
|
|
Wiley
1128 citations, 9.18%
|
|
MDPI
660 citations, 5.37%
|
|
Oxford University Press
536 citations, 4.36%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
520 citations, 4.23%
|
|
Emerald
256 citations, 2.08%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
252 citations, 2.05%
|
|
185 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
151 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
130 citations, 1.06%
|
|
JMIR Publications
126 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
97 citations, 0.79%
|
|
BMJ
76 citations, 0.62%
|
|
IGI Global
61 citations, 0.5%
|
|
SLACK
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
40 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
SciELO
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Duke University Press
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Bristol University Press
24 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IOS Press
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
CAIRN
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
OpenEdition
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Caisse Nationale d'assurance Vieillesse
13 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
12 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
12 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
11 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Public Health Association
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Human Kinetics
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IntechOpen
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, Inc.
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Economic Association
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Fondation Nationale de Gerontologie
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
S. Karger AG
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Linkoping University Electronic Press
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Singapore Medical Association
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pacini Editore
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Medknow
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hans Publishers
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Management
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Association of Social Workers Press
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Real Estate Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Adult Nursing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Berkeley Electronic Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universiti Putra Malaysia
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Human Geographical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pan American Health Organization
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Brown University
33 publications, 2.75%
|
|
University of Minnesota
32 publications, 2.66%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
22 publications, 1.83%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
22 publications, 1.83%
|
|
University of Southern California
21 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Florida State University
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Miami University
16 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Boston University
15 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Michigan
14 publications, 1.16%
|
|
National University of Singapore
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Boston College
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
13 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
12 publications, 1%
|
|
Harvard University
12 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Toronto
11 publications, 0.92%
|
|
New York University
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
10 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Connecticut
9 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Yale University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Duke University
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of South Florida
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Kentucky
8 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Haifa
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
La Trobe University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Columbia University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
West Virginia University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Syracuse University
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
7 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Peking University
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Fudan University
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Sydney
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Ohio State University
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Alberta
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
6 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Flinders University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Stanford University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Sheffield
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Florida
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of North Texas
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Portland State University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Stockholm University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Wuhan University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Lausanne
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
George Washington University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
American University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Trent University
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Manitoba
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Rochester
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Connecticut Health
4 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Heidelberg University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Linköping University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Umeå University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Jönköping University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Curtin University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
James Cook University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Federation University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Georgetown University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yonsei University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Lingnan University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Ghana
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Brown University
15 publications, 4.57%
|
|
Miami University
12 publications, 3.66%
|
|
University of Minnesota
11 publications, 3.35%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
9 publications, 2.74%
|
|
New York University
8 publications, 2.44%
|
|
University of Toronto
8 publications, 2.44%
|
|
University of Michigan
7 publications, 2.13%
|
|
National University of Singapore
6 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Boston University
6 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Duke University
6 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
5 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Fudan University
4 publications, 1.22%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
4 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
4 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of South Florida
4 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Peking University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Flinders University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Seoul National University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Boston College
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Trent University
3 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
International Institute for Population Sciences
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Haifa
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Linköping University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Umeå University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Xiamen University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Turku
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Manchester
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of South Australia
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Yonsei University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lingnan University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Central Florida
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lancaster University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Addis Ababa University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Western University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Guelph
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of North Texas
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Alabama
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Nebraska at Omaha
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université du Québec en Outaouais
2 publications, 0.61%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Marmara University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Ondokuz Mayis University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 0.3%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 677, 56.32%
USA
677 publications, 56.32%
|
China
|
China, 81, 6.74%
China
81 publications, 6.74%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 53, 4.41%
Canada
53 publications, 4.41%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 41, 3.41%
United Kingdom
41 publications, 3.41%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 39, 3.24%
Australia
39 publications, 3.24%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 31, 2.58%
Italy
31 publications, 2.58%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 25, 2.08%
Israel
25 publications, 2.08%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 23, 1.91%
Japan
23 publications, 1.91%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 20, 1.66%
Germany
20 publications, 1.66%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 19, 1.58%
Sweden
19 publications, 1.58%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 16, 1.33%
Republic of Korea
16 publications, 1.33%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 16, 1.33%
Singapore
16 publications, 1.33%
|
India
|
India, 14, 1.16%
India
14 publications, 1.16%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 13, 1.08%
Netherlands
13 publications, 1.08%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 0.92%
Switzerland
11 publications, 0.92%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 0.83%
Finland
10 publications, 0.83%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 8, 0.67%
South Africa
8 publications, 0.67%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 7, 0.58%
Ghana
7 publications, 0.58%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 0.5%
Spain
6 publications, 0.5%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.5%
Poland
6 publications, 0.5%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 6, 0.5%
Thailand
6 publications, 0.5%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 6, 0.5%
Chile
6 publications, 0.5%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.42%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.42%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.42%
Norway
5 publications, 0.42%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.33%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.33%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.25%
Russia
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.25%
Austria
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.25%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.25%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.25%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.17%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.17%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.17%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 2, 0.17%
Peru
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.17%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.17%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.17%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.08%
France
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.08%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.08%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.08%
Greece
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.08%
Iran
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.08%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Lesotho
|
Lesotho, 1, 0.08%
Lesotho
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.08%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.08%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.08%
Malta
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.08%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.08%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.08%
UAE
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.08%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.08%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.08%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.08%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.08%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Show all (25 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
USA
|
USA, 168, 51.22%
USA
168 publications, 51.22%
|
China
|
China, 42, 12.8%
China
42 publications, 12.8%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 28, 8.54%
Canada
28 publications, 8.54%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 4.88%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 4.88%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 10, 3.05%
Australia
10 publications, 3.05%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 3.05%
Israel
10 publications, 3.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 3.05%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 3.05%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 9, 2.74%
Singapore
9 publications, 2.74%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 8, 2.44%
Germany
8 publications, 2.44%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 8, 2.44%
Finland
8 publications, 2.44%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 2.44%
Sweden
8 publications, 2.44%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 1.52%
Italy
5 publications, 1.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 1.52%
Netherlands
5 publications, 1.52%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 5, 1.52%
Thailand
5 publications, 1.52%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 1.52%
Switzerland
5 publications, 1.52%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 1.52%
South Africa
5 publications, 1.52%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 1.52%
Japan
5 publications, 1.52%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 1.22%
Ghana
4 publications, 1.22%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 1.22%
Poland
4 publications, 1.22%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.91%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.91%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.91%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.91%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.91%
Chile
3 publications, 0.91%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.61%
Russia
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.61%
Austria
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.61%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.61%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.61%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.61%
India
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.61%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.61%
Spain
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.61%
Norway
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.61%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.61%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.61%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.61%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.3%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.3%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.3%
Greece
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.3%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.3%
Iran
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.3%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.3%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.3%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.3%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.3%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.3%
UAE
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.3%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.3%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.3%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|