Optimization Methods and Software
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.4
SJR
1.001
CiteScore
4.5
Categories
Applied Mathematics
Control and Optimization
Software
Areas
Computer Science
Mathematics
Years of issue
1992-2025
journal names
Optimization Methods and Software
OPTIM METHOD SOFTW
Top-3 citing journals

Optimization Methods and Software
(1024 citations)

Computational Optimization and Applications
(906 citations)

SIAM Journal on Optimization
(868 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Florida
(28 publications)

Argonne National Laboratory
(27 publications)

Dalian University of Technology
(26 publications)

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
(13 publications)

Université Catholique de Louvain
(11 publications)

Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics
(9 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 764
Q3
Codes and standards on computational wind engineering for structural design: State of art and recent trends
Q3
Wind and Structures, An International Journal
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Q3
Characteristics of the aerodynamic interference between two high-rise buildings of different height and identical square cross-section
Dongmei H., Xue Z., Shiqing H., Xuhui H., Hua H.
In this work, wind tunnel tests of pressure measurements are carried out to assess the global aerodynamic interference factors, the local wind pressure interference factors, and the local lift spectra of an square high-rise building interfered by an identical cross-sections but lower height building arranged in various relative positions. The results show that, when the interfering building is located in an area of oblique upstream, the RMS of the along-wind, across-wind, and torsional aerodynamic forces on the test building increase significantly, and when it is located to a side, the mean across-wind and torsional aerodynamic forces increase; In addition, when the interfering building is located upstream or staggered upstream, the mean wind pressures on the sheltered windward side turn form positive to negative and with a maximum absolute value of up to 1.75 times, and the fluctuating wind pressures on the sheltered windward side and leading edge of the side increase significantly with decreasing spacing ratio (up to a maximum of 3.5 times). When it is located to a side, the mean and fluctuating wind pressures on the leading edge of inner side are significantly increased. The three-dimensional flow around a slightly-shorter disturbing building has a great effect on the average and fluctuating wind pressures on the windward or cross-wind faces. When the disturbing building is near to the test building, the vortex shedding peak in the lift spectra decreases and there are no obvious signs of periodicity, however, the energies of the high frequency components undergo an obvious increase.
Q3
Consistent inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer for the SST k-ω model
Yang Y., Xie Z., Gu M.
Modelling an equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) in computational wind engineering (CWE) and relevant areas requires the boundary conditions, the turbulence model and associated constants to be consistent with each other. Among them, the inflow boundary conditions play an important role and determine whether the equations of the turbulence model are satisfied in the whole domain. In this paper, the idea of modeling an equilibrium ABL through specifying proper inflow boundary conditions is extended to the SST k-w model, which is regarded as a better RANS model for simulating the blunt body flow than the standard k-w model. Two new sets of inflow boundary conditions corresponding to different descriptions of the inflow velocity profiles, the logarithmic law and the power law respectively, are then theoretically proposed and numerically verified. A method of determining the undetermined constants and a set of parameter system are then given, which are suitable for the standard wind terrains defined in the wind load code. Finally, the full inflow boundary condition equations considering the scale effect are presented for the purpose of general use.
Q3
Dynamic analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridges under wind and traffic using aerodynamic coefficients considering aerodynamic interference
Han W., Liu H., Wu J., Yuan Y., Chen A.
The aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles are critical to assess vehicle safety and passenger comfort for vehicles running on long span bridges in a windy environment. However, in previous wind–vehicle–bridge (WVB) system analysis, the aerodynamic interference between the vehicle and the bridge was seldom considered, which will result in changing aerodynamic coefficients. In this study, the aerodynamic coefficients of a high-sided truck on the ground (ground case) and a typical bridge deck (bridge deck case) are determined in a wind tunnel. The effects of existent structures including the bridge deck and bridge accessories on the high-sided vehicle\'s aerodynamic characteristics are investigated. A three-dimensional analytical framework of a fully coupled WVB system is then established based on the finite element method. By inputting the aerodynamic coefficients of both cases into the WVB system separately, the vehicle safety and passenger comfort are assessed, and the critical accidental wind speed for the truck on the bridge in a windy environment is derived. The differences in the bridge response between the windward case and the leeward case are also compared. The results show that the bridge deck and the accessories play a positive role in ensuring vehicle safety and improving passenger comfort, and the influence of aerodynamic interference on the response of the bridge is weak.
Q3
Flutter performance of central-slotted plate at large angles of attack
Tang H., Li Y., Chen X., Shum K.M., Liao H.
The flutter instability is one of the most important themes need to be carefully investigated in the design of long-span bridges. This study takes the central-slotted ideal thin flat plate as an object, and examines the characteristics of unsteady surface pressures of stationary and vibrating cross sections based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The flutter derivatives are extracted from the surface pressure distribution and the critical flutter wind speed of a long span suspension bridge is then calculated. The influences of angle of attack and the slot ratio on the flutter performance of central-slotted plate are investigated. The results show that the critical flutter wind speed reduces with increase in angle of attack. At lower angles of attack where the plate shows the characteristics of a streamlined cross-section, the existence of central slot can improve the critical flutter wind speed. On the other hand, at larger angles of attack, where the plate becomes a bluff body, the existence of central slot further reduces the flutter performance.
Q3
A 3-DOF forced vibration system for time-domain aeroelastic parameter identification
Sauder H.S., Sarkar P.P.
A novel three-degree-of-freedom (DOF) forced vibration system has been developed for identification of aeroelastic (self-excited) load parameters used in time-domain response analysis of wind-excited flexible structures. This system is capable of forcing sinusoidal motions on a section model of a structure that is used in wind tunnel aeroelastic studies along all three degrees of freedom - along-wind, cross-wind, and torsional - simultaneously or in any combination thereof. It utilizes three linear actuators to force vibrations at a consistent frequency but varying amplitudes between the three. This system was designed to identify all the parameters, namely, aeroelastic- damping and stiffness that appear in self-excited (motion-dependent) load formulation either in time-domain (rational functions) or frequency-domain (flutter derivatives). Relatively large displacements (at low frequencies) can be generated by the system, if required. Results from three experiments, airfoil, streamlined bridge deck and a bluff-shaped bridge deck, are presented to demonstrate the functionality and robustness of the system and its applicability to multiple cross-section types. The system will allow routine identification of aeroelastic parameters through wind tunnel tests that can be used to predict response of flexible structures in extreme and transient wind conditions.
Q3
Concrete columns reinforced with Zinc Oxide nanoparticles subjected to electric field: buckling analysis
Arbabi A., Kolahchi R., Bidgoli M.R.
As concrete is most usable material in construction industry it\'s been required to improve its quality. Nowadays, nanotechnology offers the possibility of great advances in construction. In this study, buckling of horizontal concrete columns reinforced with Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles is analyzed. Due to the presence of ZnO nanoparticles which have piezoelectric properties, the structure is subjected to electric field for intelligent control. The Column is located in foundation with vertical springs and shear modulus constants. Sinusoidal shear deformation beam theory (SSDBT) is applied to model the structure mathematically. Micro-electro-mechanic model is utilized for obtaining the equivalent properties of system. Using the nonlinear stress-strain relation, energy method and Hamilton\'s principal, the motion equations are derived. The buckling load of the column is calculated by Difference quadrature method (DQM). The aim of this study is presenting a mathematical model to obtain the buckling load of structure as well as investigating the effect of nanotechnology and electric filed on the buckling behavior of structure. The results indicate that the negative external voltage applied to the structure, increases the stiffness and the buckling load of column. In addition, reinforcing the structure by ZnO nanoparticles, the buckling load of column is increased.
Q3
Wind tunnel investigation on flutter and buffeting of a three-tower suspension bridge
Zhang W., Ge Y.
The Maanshan Bridge over Yangtze River in China is a new long-span suspension bridge with double main spans of 2x1080 m and a closed streamline cross-section of single box deck. The flutter and buffeting performances were investigated via wind tunnel tests of a full bridge aeroelastic model at a geometric scale of 1:211. The tests were conducted in both smooth wind and simulated boundary layer wind fields. Emphasis is placed on studying the interference effect of adjacent span via installing a wind deflector and a wind separating board to shelter one span of the bridge model from incoming flow. Issues related to effects of mid-tower stiffness and deck supporting conditions are also discussed. The testing results show that flutter critical wind velocities in smooth flow, with a wind deflector, are remarkably lower than those without. In turbulent wind, torsional and vertical standard deviations for the deck responses at midspan in testing cases without wind deflector are generally less than those at the midspan exposed to wind in testing cases with wind deflector, respectively. When double main spans are exposed to turbulent wind, the existence of either span is a mass damper to the other. Furthermore, both effects of mid-tower stiffness and deck supporting conditions at the middle tower on the flutter and buffeting performances of the Maanshan Bridge are unremarkable.
Q3
Hybrid bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower structures by vibration and impedance responses
Nguyen T., Huynh T., Yi J., Kim J.
In recent years, the wind energy has played an increasingly important role in national energy sector of many countries. To harvest more electric power, the wind turbine (WT) tower structure becomes physically larger, which may cause more risks during long-term operation. Associated with the great development of WT projects, the number of accidents related to large-scaled WT has also been increased. Therefore, a structural health monitoring (SHM) system for WT structures is needed to ensure their safety and serviceability during operational time. The objective of this study is to develop a hybrid damage detection method for WT tower structures by measuring vibration and impedance responses. To achieve the objective, the following approaches are implemented. Firstly, a hybrid damage detection scheme which combines vibration-based and impedance-based methods is proposed as a sequential process in three stages. Secondly, a series of vibration and impedance tests are conducted on a lab-scaled model of the WT structure in which a set of bolt-loosening cases is simulated for the segmental joints. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed hybrid damage detection method is experimentally evaluated via its performance during the damage detection process in the tested model.
Q3
Monitoring system for the wind-induced dynamic motion of 1/100-scale spar-type floating offshore wind turbine
Kim C.M., Cho J.R., Kim S.R., Lee Y.S.
Differing from the fixed-type, the dynamic motion of floating-type offshore wind turbines is very sensitive to wind and wave excitations. Thus, the sensing and monitoring of its motion is important to evaluate the dynamic responses to the external excitation. In this context, a monitoring system for sensing and processing the wind-induced dynamic motion of spar-type floating offshore wind turbine is developed in this study. It is developed by integrating a 1/00 scale model of 2.5MW spar-type floating offshore wind turbine, water basin equipped with the wind generator, sensing and data acquisition systems, real-time CompactRIO controller and monitoring program. The scale model with the upper rotatable blades is installed within the basin by means of three mooring lines, and its translational and rotational motions are detected by 3-axis inclinometer and accelerometers and gyroscope. The detected motion signals are processed using a real-time controller CompactRIO to calculate the acceleration and tilting angle of nacelle and the attitude of floating platform. The developed monitoring system is demonstrated and validated by measuring and evaluating the time histories and trajectories of nacelle and platform motions for three different wind velocities and for eight different fairlead positions.
Q3
Alternative numerical method for identification of flutter on free vibration
Chun N., Moon J., Lee H.
The minimization method is widely used to predict the dynamic characteristics of a system. Generally, data recorded by experiment (for example displacement) tends to contain noise, and the error in the properties of the system is proportional to the noise level (NL). In addition, the accuracy of the results depends on various factors such as the signal character, filtering method or cut off frequency. In particular, coupled terms in multimode systems show larger differences compared to the true value when measured in an environment with a high NL. The iterative least square (ILS) method was proposed to reduce these errors that occur under a high NL, and has been verified in previous research. However, the ILS method might be sensitive to the signal processing, including the determination of cutoff frequency. This paper focused on improving the accuracy of the ILS method, and proposed the modified ILS (MILS) method, which differs from the ILS method by the addition of a new calculation process based on correlation coefficients for each degree of freedom. Comparing the results of these systems with those of a numerical simulation revealed that both ILS and the proposed MILS method provided good prediction of the dynamic properties of the system under investigation (in this case, the damping ratio and damped frequency). Moreover, the proposed MILS method provided even better prediction results for the coupling terms of stiffness and damping coefficient matrix.
Q3
Free transverse vibration of shear deformable super-elliptical plates
Altekin M.
Free transverse vibration of shear deformable super-elliptical plates with uniform thickness was studied based on Mindlin plate theory using finite element method. Quadrilateral isoparametric elements were used in the paper. Sensitivity analysis was made to determine the influence of the thickness, the aspect ratio, and the shape of the plate on the natural frequency. Accuracy of the results computed in the current study was validated by comparing them with the solutions available in the literature. The results reveal that the frequencies of clamped super-elliptical plates lie in the range bounded by elliptical and rectangular plates irrespective of the aspect ratio, and furthermore, the frequency decreases if the super-elliptical power increases. A similar trend was observed for simply supported plates with high aspect ratio. The free vibration response for the first and the second symmetric-antisymmetric (SA) modes were found to be different for high aspect ratio. The results reveal that using insufficient number of degrees of freedom results in finding a totally different relation between the super-elliptical power and the frequency.
Q3
Application of inverse reliability method to estimation of flutter safety factors of suspension bridges
Cheng J., Dong F.
An efficient and accurate algorithm is proposed to estimate flutter safety factor of suspension bridges satisfying prescribed reliability levels. Uncertainties which arise from the basic wind speed at the bridge deck location, critical flutter velocity, the wind conversion factor from a scaled model to the prototype structure and the gust speed factor are incorporated. The proposed algorithm integrates the concepts of the inverse reliability method and the calculation method of the critical flutter velocity of suspension bridges. The unique feature of the proposed method is that it offers a tool for flutter safety assessment of suspension bridges, when the reliability level is specified as a target to be satisfied by the designer. Accuracy and efficiency of this method with reference to three example suspension bridges is studied and numerical results validate its superiority over conventional deterministic method. Finally, the effects of various parameters on the flutter safety factor of suspension bridges are also investigated.
Q3
Frequency and critical fluid velocity analysis of pipes reinforced with FG-CNTs conveying internal flows
Ghaitani M., Majidian A.
This paper addresses vibration and instability of embedded functionally graded (FG)-carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-reinforced pipes conveying viscous fluid. The surrounding elastic medium is modeled by temperature-dependent orthotropic Pasternak medium. Flugge shell model is applied for mathematical modeling of structure. Based on energy method and Hamilton
Q3
Analysis of the effect of blade positions on the aerodynamic performances of wind turbine tower-blade system in halt states
Ke S., Yu W., Wang T., Ge Y., Tamura Y.
The unsteady flow field disturbance between the blades and tower is one of the primary factors affecting the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine. Based on the research object of a 3MW horizontal axis wind turbine which was developed independently by Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, numerical simulation on the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine system in halt state with blades in different position was conducted using large eddy simulation (LES) method. Based on the 3D unsteady numerical simulation results in a total of eight conditions (determined by the relative position with the tower during the complete rotation process of the blade), the characteristics of wind pressure distributions of the wind turbine system and action mechanism of surrounding flow field were analysed. The effect of different position of blades on the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine in halt state as well as the disturbance effect was evaluated. Results of the study showed that the halt position of blades had significant effect on the wind pressure distribution of the wind turbine system as well as the characteristics of flow around. Relevant conclusions from this study provided reference for the wind-resistant design of large scale wind turbine system in different halt states.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Optimization Methods and Software
1024 citations, 2.95%
|
|
Computational Optimization and Applications
906 citations, 2.61%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Optimization
868 citations, 2.5%
|
|
Mathematical Programming
759 citations, 2.18%
|
|
Journal of Global Optimization
699 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
691 citations, 1.99%
|
|
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
687 citations, 1.98%
|
|
Optimization
487 citations, 1.4%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
477 citations, 1.37%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
345 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
338 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Optimization Letters
320 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Numerical Algorithms
307 citations, 0.88%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
278 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Computation
245 citations, 0.71%
|
|
IFAC-PapersOnLine
217 citations, 0.62%
|
|
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
217 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Computers and Chemical Engineering
185 citations, 0.53%
|
|
IEEE Access
178 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Optimization and Engineering
175 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Automatica
173 citations, 0.5%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
164 citations, 0.47%
|
|
SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing
157 citations, 0.45%
|
|
INFORMS Journal on Computing
154 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Computers and Operations Research
153 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Computational and Applied Mathematics
152 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Annals of Operations Research
149 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Mathematical Programming Computation
143 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Mathematics
142 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Springer Optimization and Its Applications
128 citations, 0.37%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
117 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Fisheries Research
116 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
115 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing
112 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
110 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Scientific Computing
102 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Mathematics of Operations Research
101 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Control
99 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Inequalities and Applications
96 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Neurocomputing
95 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Applied Numerical Mathematics
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Series in Operations Research and Management Science
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Physical Review A
93 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Signal Processing
92 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
90 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Operations Research
89 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
87 citations, 0.25%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
85 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
85 citations, 0.24%
|
|
PLoS ONE
85 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
83 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of the Operations Research Society of China
82 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
82 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
81 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics
80 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
76 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Operations Research Letters
76 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research
76 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
75 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Linear Algebra and Its Applications
75 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Computer Mathematics
73 citations, 0.21%
|
|
RAIRO - Operations Research
69 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization
69 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Computers and Mathematics with Applications
69 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
63 citations, 0.18%
|
|
AIMS Mathematics
62 citations, 0.18%
|
|
EURO Journal on Computational Optimization
61 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
60 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Soft Computing
59 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Computational Physics
59 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization
58 citations, 0.17%
|
|
TOP
58 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications
57 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Discrete Applied Mathematics
57 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sensors
57 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Control Systems Letters
56 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of the Franklin Institute
56 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
55 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Algorithms
55 citations, 0.16%
|
|
4OR
54 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Applied Intelligence
52 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
51 citations, 0.15%
|
|
ICES Journal of Marine Science
51 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
50 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Communications
48 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Reports
48 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
46 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Information Sciences
45 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AICHE Journal
44 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
44 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
43 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Computational Management Science
43 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
43 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Mathematical Modelling
43 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pattern Recognition
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Symmetry
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
41 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
|
Springer Nature
9730 citations, 28.01%
|
|
Elsevier
6333 citations, 18.23%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5674 citations, 16.33%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2365 citations, 6.81%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
1427 citations, 4.11%
|
|
Wiley
1335 citations, 3.84%
|
|
MDPI
702 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
470 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
375 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
353 citations, 1.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
337 citations, 0.97%
|
|
IOP Publishing
235 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Oxford University Press
226 citations, 0.65%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
180 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
176 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
173 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
163 citations, 0.47%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
159 citations, 0.46%
|
|
World Scientific
152 citations, 0.44%
|
|
EDP Sciences
147 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
130 citations, 0.37%
|
|
SAGE
123 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
110 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
106 citations, 0.31%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
100 citations, 0.29%
|
|
AIP Publishing
89 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
61 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Operations Research Society of Japan
55 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ASME International
55 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
53 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Emerald
52 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
50 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Science in China Press
45 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Royal Society
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
MIT Press
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IGI Global
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
European Control Association
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SciELO
32 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
32 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
28 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
26 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
26 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
22 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Copernicus
21 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
20 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
20 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
20 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
proceedings of the american control conference
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
17 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hans Publishers
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Biophysical Society
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Energy Economics
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mathematical Society of the Republic of China
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IWA Publishing
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wuhan University
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tech Science Press
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tusi Mathematical Research Group (TMRG)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long Term Care
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Alexandria University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Szeged, Institute of Informatics
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ain Shams University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Multi-Science Publishing Co Ltd.
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science Alert
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Thomas Telford
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
University of Florida
28 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
27 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
26 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Lehigh University
26 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
23 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
21 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
21 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
19 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
18 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Florence
18 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Kyoto University
18 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
17 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
17 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Calabria
16 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
16 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Northwestern University
16 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Hunan University
16 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Zuse Institute Berlin
16 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Namur
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
McMaster University
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics
15 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
14 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
14 publications, 0.81%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Curtin University
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
13 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Linköping University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Paderborn University
12 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Shanghai University
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Stanford University
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Waterloo
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
11 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Fudan University
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Imperial College London
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Bergamo
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
10 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bologna
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bergen
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National University of Singapore
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
McGill University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tilburg University
9 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Heidelberg University
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Washington
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
8 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Semnan University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Beihang University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
China Agricultural University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Xidian University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Tokyo University of Science
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Southampton
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Pisa
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Princeton University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Virginia Tech
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
New York University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hamburg University
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Tokyo
7 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control of the Russian Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
South China Normal University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Turku
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Cornell University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Birmingham
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Purdue University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Trier University
6 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
13 publications, 4.48%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
11 publications, 3.79%
|
|
Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics
9 publications, 3.1%
|
|
Lehigh University
9 publications, 3.1%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
8 publications, 2.76%
|
|
Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 2.76%
|
|
Stanford University
6 publications, 2.07%
|
|
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 2.07%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
5 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
5 publications, 1.72%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
5 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
5 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Northwestern University
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Kyoto University
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Zuse Institute Berlin
4 publications, 1.38%
|
|
N.N. Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Semnan University
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Florence
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Calabria
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Zhejiang Normal University
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Tilburg University
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Chuo University
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
3 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Institute of Problems of Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
![]() Sobolev Institute of Mathematics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Can Tho University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Shahed University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
South China University of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Beihang University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Central South University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Linköping University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Chongqing Technology and Business University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Hunan First Normal University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Turku
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Tokyo University of Science
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Southampton
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
China Medical University (Taiwan)
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Qufu Normal University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Bayero University, Kano
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, Merced
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Xiangtan University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Namur
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Wayne State University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Trier University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Wake Forest University
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Polytechnique Montréal
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Melentiev Energy Systems Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Matrosov Institute for System Dynamics and Control Theory SB RAS
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 375, 21.71%
USA
375 publications, 21.71%
|
China
|
China, 282, 16.33%
China
282 publications, 16.33%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 183, 10.6%
Germany
183 publications, 10.6%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 117, 6.77%
Italy
117 publications, 6.77%
|
France
|
France, 81, 4.69%
France
81 publications, 4.69%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 78, 4.52%
Russia
78 publications, 4.52%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 78, 4.52%
Japan
78 publications, 4.52%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 77, 4.46%
United Kingdom
77 publications, 4.46%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 68, 3.94%
Canada
68 publications, 3.94%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 62, 3.59%
Iran
62 publications, 3.59%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 58, 3.36%
Brazil
58 publications, 3.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 47, 2.72%
Belgium
47 publications, 2.72%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 38, 2.2%
Australia
38 publications, 2.2%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 33, 1.91%
Czech Republic
33 publications, 1.91%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 28, 1.62%
Netherlands
28 publications, 1.62%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 26, 1.51%
Portugal
26 publications, 1.51%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 23, 1.33%
Austria
23 publications, 1.33%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 19, 1.1%
Spain
19 publications, 1.1%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 19, 1.1%
Turkey
19 publications, 1.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 18, 1.04%
Hungary
18 publications, 1.04%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 18, 1.04%
Sweden
18 publications, 1.04%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 17, 0.98%
Romania
17 publications, 0.98%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 16, 0.93%
Switzerland
16 publications, 0.93%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 0.81%
Finland
14 publications, 0.81%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 13, 0.75%
Greece
13 publications, 0.75%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 13, 0.75%
Poland
13 publications, 0.75%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 13, 0.75%
Singapore
13 publications, 0.75%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 12, 0.69%
Norway
12 publications, 0.69%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 11, 0.64%
Denmark
11 publications, 0.64%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 0.64%
Israel
11 publications, 0.64%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 0.58%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 0.58%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 9, 0.52%
Thailand
9 publications, 0.52%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 9, 0.52%
Ecuador
9 publications, 0.52%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 0.41%
Vietnam
7 publications, 0.41%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.41%
Nigeria
7 publications, 0.41%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 7, 0.41%
Saudi Arabia
7 publications, 0.41%
|
India
|
India, 6, 0.35%
India
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 6, 0.35%
Serbia
6 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.35%
South Africa
6 publications, 0.35%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 5, 0.29%
Venezuela
5 publications, 0.29%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.29%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.29%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 0.29%
Mexico
5 publications, 0.29%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 5, 0.29%
New Zealand
5 publications, 0.29%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.29%
UAE
5 publications, 0.29%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.23%
Oman
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.23%
Chile
4 publications, 0.23%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.17%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.17%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.17%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.17%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.17%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 2, 0.12%
Belarus
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.12%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.12%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.12%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.12%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.12%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.12%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.12%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.06%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.06%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.06%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.06%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.06%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.06%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.06%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.06%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.06%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.06%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (38 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 57, 19.66%
USA
57 publications, 19.66%
|
China
|
China, 56, 19.31%
China
56 publications, 19.31%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 37, 12.76%
Germany
37 publications, 12.76%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 26, 8.97%
Russia
26 publications, 8.97%
|
France
|
France, 25, 8.62%
France
25 publications, 8.62%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 18, 6.21%
Japan
18 publications, 6.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 17, 5.86%
Belgium
17 publications, 5.86%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 16, 5.52%
Iran
16 publications, 5.52%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 15, 5.17%
Brazil
15 publications, 5.17%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 4.14%
Canada
12 publications, 4.14%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 3.79%
Italy
11 publications, 3.79%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 2.76%
United Kingdom
8 publications, 2.76%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 6, 2.07%
Romania
6 publications, 2.07%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 6, 2.07%
Saudi Arabia
6 publications, 2.07%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 6, 2.07%
Czech Republic
6 publications, 2.07%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 1.72%
Portugal
5 publications, 1.72%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 1.72%
Netherlands
5 publications, 1.72%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 1.72%
Switzerland
5 publications, 1.72%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 4, 1.38%
Australia
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 1.38%
Austria
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 1.38%
Vietnam
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 1.38%
Israel
4 publications, 1.38%
|
India
|
India, 4, 1.38%
India
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 1.38%
Nigeria
4 publications, 1.38%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 1.38%
UAE
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 1.38%
Singapore
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 1.38%
Sweden
4 publications, 1.38%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 1.03%
Thailand
3 publications, 1.03%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.69%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.69%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.69%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.69%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.69%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.69%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.69%
Finland
2 publications, 0.69%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.69%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.69%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.34%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.34%
Greece
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.34%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.34%
Spain
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.34%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.34%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.34%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.34%
Poland
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.34%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.34%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.34%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Show all (17 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
1 profile journal article
Milovanović Gradimir
118 publications,
486 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Kanzow Christian
45 publications,
1 787 citations
h-index: 18