Open Access
Pediatrics and Neonatology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.3
SJR
0.493
CiteScore
3.1
Categories
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2008-2025
journal names
Pediatrics and Neonatology
PEDIATR NEONATOL
Top-3 citing journals

Pediatrics and Neonatology
(589 citations)

Frontiers in Pediatrics
(406 citations)

PLoS ONE
(231 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Chang Gung University
(206 publications)

National Taiwan University Hospital
(129 publications)

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
(96 publications)

Chang Gung University
(66 publications)

Taipei Medical University
(24 publications)

Kaohsiung Medical University
(21 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 3680
Q1

Biocontrol insects have stronger effects than non-biocontrol insects on plants
Stiling P., Lajeunesse M.J.
Q1
BioControl
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Developmental time, potential food sources and predatory behaviour of the invasive pest species Thrips parvispinus
Le Hesran S., Sewkaransing D., Kuoh H.E., Messelink G.J.
Abstract
Biological control of invasive thrips is a challenge in many agricultural systems, partly because of a lack of knowledge about their life cycle and interactions with their environment. Thrips parvispinus Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is an invasive species causing damage to many crops worldwide and on which our knowledge is still limited. We studied the developmental time of T. parvispinus under three different fluctuating temperature regimes, its predatory behaviour against the eggs of a phytoseiid predatory mite and the effect of different food sources on its oviposition rate. We showed that T. parvispinus adult females and L2 larvae can feed on a limited number of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) eggs and that their predatory behaviour is significantly affected by the nutritional quality of the host plant and the presence of pollen. Additionally, the oviposition rate of T. parvispinus females over six days was not positively affected by the presence of Typha angustifolia pollen, Artemia cysts or prey mites on bean leaves. Finally, we showed that the developmental time of T. parvispinus is relatively fast and comparable to that of the invasive thrips species Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Our study provides further insight into the feeding behaviour of T. parvispinus as an omnivorous pest species and its interactions with its predators. Thrips parvispinus is unlikely to have a negative effect on phytoseiid mite populations and the use of supplementary food to support predatory mites in the crop does not seem to pose a risk of significantly increasing T. parvispinus populations.
Q1

Potential of an entomopathogenic fungus from the Cladosporium cladosporioides species complex for aphid control: insights from biological parameters and bioassays
Silva C.A., Godoy L., Ahumada M.I., Carvajal M., Chorbadjian R.A.
Q1
BioControl
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Beauveria bassiana-based management of Thrips palmi in greenhouse
Mushyakhwo K., Maxwell L.A., Nai Y., Srinivasan R., Hwang S.
Thrips palmi Karny (melon thrips) damages over 200 plant species through direct feeding and vectoring tospoviruses. Excessive use of pesticides has led to melon thrips resistance development, necessitating the exploration of sustainable alternative control options. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPFs) can potentially be an effective alternative biocontrol agent to control melon thrips. In this study, the virulence of nine indigenous EPFs isolates was tested against the second instar larvae and adult melon thrips under laboratory conditions. The promising EPFs were selected and compared to commercial Beauveria bassiana A1 and imidacloprid on susceptible pepper plants infested with melon thrips under greenhouse conditions. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation was also performed. The results indicated that, out of the nine EPFs, B. bassiana-NCHU-157 (Bb-NCHU-157) caused the highest mortality in both larval (35%) and adult (98%) thrips at seven days post-inoculation, followed by Metarhizium lepidiotae-NCHU-9 (Ml-NCHU-9), which exhibited 31% larval and 81% adult mortality. Germ tube and appressorium formation were observed under the SEM after 36 h post-inoculation (hpi) for Ml-NCHU-9 and 48 hpi for Bb-NCHU-157 on adult melon thrips, respectively. While all biocontrol treatments were less effective than imidacloprid at suppressing thrips populations, both Bb-NCHU-157 and Ml-NCHU-9 were able to control the thrips population by up to 60% compared to the non-treated control under greenhouse conditions. However, there was no significant difference among Bb-NCHU-157, Ml-NCHU-9, and commercial biopesticide B. bassiana A1 treatments, highlighting the potential of these two indigenous isolates, Bb-NCHU-157 and Ml-NCHU-9, as viable biocontrol agents for melon thrips management.
Q1

Effects of clonal integration on the invasive weed Alternanthera philoxeroides and its native congener varied with plant–herbivore coevolutionary history: implications for management
Huang Z., Guo W., Tang J., Li X.
Clonal invaders can cope with herbivory via clonal integration, but how the impacts of clonal integration are affected by plant-herbivore coevolution history is still poorly understood. Alternanthera philoxeroides (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae) is an amphibious clonal invader. The beetle Agasicles hygrophila (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was introduced to control A. philoxeroides, and also feeds on the native Alternanthera sessilis (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae) in China. We grew the apical and basal parts of A. philoxeroides and A. sessilis, connected or disconnected with the stolon, and exposed apical parts to A. hygrophila or the native beetle Cassida piperata (Coleoptera: Cassididae) that also feeds on both plants. Both beetles significantly reduced the stem length, belowground biomass and photosynthesis of both plants without clonal integration, and flea beetles had a stronger negative impact on A. philoxeroides than did tortoise beetles. The stem length, stem diameter, belowground and/or aboveground biomass and photosynthetic parameters of apical parts of plants under attack by their corresponding coevolved beetle were 27% ~ 391% higher with clonal integration compared to without. In contrast, when the two plants were attacked by the corresponding beetle without coevolution, the same parameters in either apical or basal parts were unchanged or significantly lower under clonal integration than no integration. These results indicate that artificial disrupting of clonal integration combined with biological control may suppress clonal plants like A. philoxeroides more effectively. Compared with coevolved monophagous herbivores, some oligophagous herbivores in invaded ranges might have a stronger potential to influence the clonal integration capacity of invasive aliens.
Q1

Nesidiocoris tenuis, Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae) and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate induce systemic resistance against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne spp. in tomatoes
Fullana A.M., Giné A., Urbaneja A., Pérez-Hedo M., Sorribas F.J., Expósito A.
Abstract
The management of Meloidogyne spp. in tomato crops presents significant challenges for sustainable agriculture. This study evaluates the potential of Nesidiocoris tenuis, Macrolophus pygmaeus, and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate—two zoophytophagous mirid species and one of the herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) they trigger—to induce systemic resistance against Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica in tomato plants (cv. Bodar). To this end, we assess the expression of the PIN2 and PR1 genes, related to the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) pathways, respectively. Exposure of tomato plants to 15 nymphs of either N. tenuis or M. pygmaeus for 24 or 48 h, and to (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate for 24 h, before inoculation with 200 second-stage juveniles of the nematodes significantly reduced nematode infectivity and reproduction. Notably, PIN2 gene expression in leaves was upregulated nine- and 14-fold by N. tenuis and M. pygmaeus, respectively, zero days after nematode inoculation (DANI) and was repressed by the nematode seven DANI with a nine-fold decrease, but not when the plants were exposed to M. pygmaeus or N. tenuis, indicating a strong early defense response. However, PR1 expression levels showed no significant changes, suggesting a predominant role of the JA pathway over the SA pathway in the induced resistance. We conclude that induction of systemic resistance in tomato plants by N. tenuis, M. pygmaeus, and (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate before nematode exposure is a promising strategy for nematode management, at least to suppress nematode infection by the primary inoculum and later reproduction.
Q1

Benefits of mixed diets for predatory ladybirds: meta-analysis of laboratory experiments
Reznik S.Y.
The development of cost-effective methods for laboratory and mass rearing of biological control agents necessarily includes the selection of the optimal diet. Experiments with some predatory coccinellids revealed so-called ‘additive effects’: feeding on mixed foods ensures lower mortality, faster larval development and adult maturation, higher fecundity, etc., than feeding on each of the components. These effects were demonstrated for eight of the 11 studied species (although not for all used combinations of foods). Meta-analysis shows that significant additive effect was found in 29.3% of 140 cases resulted from experiments with 11 species of predatory Coccinellidae performed in 21 published studies. However, if (1) one of the two mixed foods was artificial or factitious or if (2) one of the two mixed foods (that of higher quality) was limitedly provided, or if (3) the beneficial effect of mixed foods was estimated by fecundity, rate of maturation, or other indicators of reproductive activity, the probability of detection of a beneficial additive effect increased up to about 50%. These results could be used for the planning of further studies on the selection of optimal diets for laboratory and mass rearing of predatory ladybirds. In particular, a combination of a limited supply of an expensive high quality food with unlimited cheap low quality food could be the most promising and cost-effective approach.
Q1

Thrips biological control agent shows greater niche overlap with invasive alligatorweed than conventional agent in current and future climate scenarios
Schmid S.A., Sánchez-Restrepo A.F., Sosa A.J., Turnage G., Ervin G.N.
Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. (Amaranthaceae: Caryophyllales) is an aquatic invasive weed from South America with a long history of biological control. The well-studied Agasicles hygrophila Selman & Vogt, 1971 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) successfully controls A. philoxeroides in some parts of its invaded range, but is unsuitable in other areas due to its intolerance to cold temperatures. Amynothrips andersoni O’Neill, 1968 (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) has shown greater tolerance to cold temperatures, but no research has been conducted to determine its ecological niche with respect to A. philoxeroides. The aim of this study is to predict the environmental niches of A. andersoni and A. hygrophila and their overlap with that of A. philoxeroides in the North and South America under current and future climate scenarios. Accordingly, niche models were constructed in MaxEnt for all three species using environmental variables from the current climate and under two future climate scenarios (SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5) for the year 2040. The niche overlap between the two biological control agents and the host were estimated for all three scenarios. Under both future climate scenarios, the total niche of A. philoxeroides is predicted to decrease by up to 10% whereas niche area is expected to increase by up to 10% for A. andersoni and A. hygrophila. Amynothrips andersoni had a greater niche overlap with A. philoxeroides than did A. hygrophila under all three scenarios, suggesting it is currently more widely suitable for A. philoxeroides biological control and should continue to be in 2040.
Q1

Recent advances in experimental design of synthetic microbial communities for biocontrol application
Karmakar B., Thakuria D., Begum R.H., Joga R.J.
In recent years, synthetic microbial communities (SMC) have garnered significant attention as a promising approach to harness the collective capabilities of multiple microbial species across diverse applications, including plant disease management. Advances in omics technologies have provided deeper insights into the complex interactions between plant microbiomes and their surrounding environments. Notably, significant progress has been made in the design and engineering of SMC that exhibit synergistic interactions, demonstrating great potential in managing phytopathogens. Novel tools, such as automated design and artificial intelligence, are increasingly being integrated to enhance the precision and efficiency of SMC engineering. Given the complexity of natural and agricultural plant-associated systems, along with the multitude of variables that influence SMC performance, developing a universal rationale for engineering SMC for biocontrol application remains challenging. This review discusses the design perspective of SMC for biocontrol application, their underlying design principles, critical considerations, and current research endeavors. Additionally, it briefly contemplates the challenges and prospects of SMC application in plant disease management.
Q1

Paenibacillus polymyxa improves glutathione reductase activity and reduces Fusarium verticillioides incidence in maize grains
Marins M.S., Guimarães R.A., Figueiredo J.E., Alves T.H., de Fátima Dias Diniz G., Cota L.V., de Oliveira-Paiva C.A., Pfenning L.H.
Fusarium verticillioides (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae) infects maize, causing stalk rot disease and producing toxins that accumulate in grains. The antifungal activity of seven strains of Paenibacillus polymyxa (Bacillales: Paenibacillaceae) against F. verticillioides was evaluated in vitro using the microbiological growth media potato dextrose agar, malt extract agar, and crushed maize grains. The strain LIS03, which demonstrated the strongest antagonistic activity, was selected for further investigation based on its ability to reduce the severity of stalk rot disease and induce plant-defense enzymes in maize. In the greenhouse, seed inoculation and plant spraying (V4 phenological stage) with LIS03 prior to F. verticillioides injection in the stem were evaluated regarding the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and glutathione reductase (GR) in maize leaves. PAL activity significantly increased in plants inoculated with LIS03 at three and nine days post-inoculation (dpi). In contrast, plants simultaneously inoculated with LIS03 and the pathogen showed an increase of 82% in GR activity 12 dpi. Higher GR activity was correlated with reduced stalk rot severity at 6 dpi (r = − 0.53). In the field, the combination of seed inoculation followed by plant spraying, as well as plant spraying alone, resulted in a 33% reduction in disease severity. Only seed inoculation led to an 18.7% decrease. Although the grains did not show symptoms of fungal diseases in the field experiment, a culture-based blotter test revealed a high incidence of F. verticillioides. The blotter test also showed that grains from silks sprayed with LIS03 presented a reduction of 16% and 25% in the incidence of F. verticillioides in naturally infected and artificially inoculated plants, respectively. These results with P. polymyxa provide a promising avenue for developing biological control strategies for controlling maize diseases caused by F. verticillioides.
Q1

Effect of artificial sugar supply on ant-aphid interactions in protected horticulture
Foronda J., Rodríguez E., Soler J.J., González M., del Mar Téllez M., Robles-Vallet C., Barranco P., Ruano F.
Ants tending aphid colonies may reduce the effectiveness of aphid natural enemies, which can result in additional plant damage. However, their mutualistic interaction is complex, and depending on the quantity and quality of the sugar that aphids produce, it may change to a predator–prey interaction. This study aims to test this hypothesis by providing ants with a high-quality sugar supply with the prediction that ants with an extra sugar source should more often prey on aphids and, therefore, the abundance of aphids on plants should decrease. We carried out an experiment on pepper plants infested with Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouses with naturally occurring Tapinoma ibericum Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in three different periods. Results showed a significant reduction in aphid abundance and greater aphid predation by ants in plants with an artificial sugar supply. However, the expected effects varied among greenhouses and seasons. A negative effect on aphid abundance was mainly detected in autumn, whereas the largest effect on aphid predation by ants was detected in summer when lower ant activity on the plants occurred. Although our results show that artificial sugar supply changes ant behavior from tending to preying on aphids, the large variation observed indicates that other unconsidered factors influence its effectiveness. Future research should focus on understanding factors driving variations across locations and seasons. Additionally, the effect of sugar feeders and their disruption of the ant-aphid mutualism may improve the access of biological control agents to aphid colonies, which is worth testing.
Q1

The endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis R8 as a prospective biocontrol agent for managing tea blister blight and enhancing tea yield
Do Q.T.
Blister blight, caused by the fungus Exobasidium vexans, is a major disease affecting tea plants. This study aimed to isolate and evaluate the efficacy of endophytic bacterial strains as potential biocontrol agents against the disease. Thirteen endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from healthy tea plants collected in Thach That, Hanoi, Vietnam. Six of these strains exhibited antagonistic effects against E. vexans, with strains R8 and S2 showing the highest inhibition. Heat-treated bacterial supernatants lost their antifungal activity, indicating that the inhibitory compounds were protein-based. Strain R8, identified as Bacillus subtilis, also demonstrated plant growth-promoting traits, including the production of Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and phosphate solubilization. Greenhouse trials showed that both chemical fungicides and antagonistic bacteria significantly reduced disease incidence, with the preventative application of chemical fungicide being the most effective (control efficacy of about 91.05%), followed by preventative inoculation with antagonistic bacteria (82.77%). Additionally, treated plots yielded significantly more fresh tea shoots, with an increase of 19.02% and 21.17% for antagonistic bacteria and chemical fungicide treatments, respectively, compared to the control. These findings suggest that B. subtilis R8 holds promise as a biocontrol agent, providing both disease suppression and yield enhancement in tea cultivation.
Q1

Beauveria bassiana biocontrol with neem oil adjuvant is effective for the management of the cassava mosaic virus vector Bemisia tabaci in field trials
Wichienchote N., Jaiyen S., Wasuwan R., Seepiban C., Charoenvilaisiri S., Tanticharoen M., Amnuaykanjanasin A.
Cassava mosaic disease causes major losses of cassava crops in Southeast Asia. The disease is caused by the cassava mosaic virus, which is primarily transmitted by the tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Chemical insecticides are widely used to control whitefly populations. However, their effectiveness is limited by environmental issues and whitefly resistance. Biocontrol agents such as entomopathogenic fungi are alternatives to chemical insecticides. We conducted two cassava field trials of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana for the control of whitefly populations. Comparison between plants treated with B. bassiana, buprofezin, or a combination of B. bassiana-buprofezin or B. bassiana-neem oil adjuvant, were tested in the same field. The whitefly adult populations were lowest in the B. bassiana/neem oil treatment group, with up to 86% reduction compared with the control six months after application. Natural enemies of insect pests were unaffected in the B. bassiana/neem oil and B. bassiana-only treatments. Our study revealed that integrated pest management using B. bassiana and neem oil was effective for controlling whiteflies and maintaining the natural balance of insects in cassava fields.
Q1

Laboratory and field studies to assess the efficacy of the predatory mite Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki (Acari: Phytoseiidae) introduced via banker plants to control the mite pest Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae) on tomato
Gard B., Bardel A., Douin M., Perrin B., Tixier M.
The predatory mites (Phytoseiidae) tested to date cannot effectively control the mite pest Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae) due to the unfavorable characteristics of tomato leaves and stems. However, recent studies show that the phytoseiid, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki, can feed on this pest. Because T. (A.) recki is naturally present in high densities on Mentha suaveolens and Phlomis fruticosa, we performed preliminary studies using these species as banker plants in laboratory and greenhouse conditions. In laboratory conditions, we analyzed the effect of banker plants inoculated with T. (A.) recki and co-planted with tomato plants (infested or not with A. lycopersici) at two banker to tomato plants ratios. T. (A.) recki dispersed and established on tomato plants. Higher predator densities were observed on infested plants when M. suaveolens was used as a banker plant with a ratio of one banker plant to two tomato plants. In greenhouse conditions, predators were introduced on tomato plants (infested with A. lycopersici) via branches of banker plants at two densities. T. (A.) recki significantly reduced the length and intensity of stem russeting and A. lycopersici densities. The number of T. (A.) recki on tomato plants was the highest using branches of M. suaveolens at the higher densities released. These results underscore the efficacy of T. (A.) recki in controlling A. lycopersici and open new avenues for the use of M. suaveolens as a reservoir of this predator.
Q1

Effective control of insect pests through intercropping of cabbage with barley and buckwheat
Sekine T., Oe T., Komagata Y., Itabashi T.
Barley intercropping is an effective strategy for managing multiple insect pests in cabbage fields. We hypothesized that combining barley with flowering plants can increase pest suppression by enhancing parasitism and predation effects in cabbage fields. This study aimed to evaluate whether the spatial arrangements of flowering plants in a cabbage–barley intercropping system can enhance pest control. We also assessed the roles of predation by ground-dwelling predators, such as carabid beetles, and flight disruption, using Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) as the target pest. Over two years, planting flowering plants (buckwheat, lacy phacelia, and coriander) around barley-intercropped cabbage showed inconsistent pest suppression compared with those around barley intercropping alone. However, a significant increase in multiple pest suppression and parasitism by two species of parasitoid wasps was observed when cabbage was intercropped with a mixture of barley and buckwheat. This suggests that the proximity of cabbage, barley, and flowering plants plays a key role in pest control. In planter experiments, the carabid beetle Chlaenius micans (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) was able to prey on larval P. rapae crucivora on cabbage plants. Additionally, the flight activity of P. rapae crucivora seemed to be disturbed by the intercropped barley in cabbage fields. These findings highlight the importance of both top-down and bottom-up effects in suppressing pest populations in cabbage–barley–buckwheat intercropping systems.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Pediatrics and Neonatology
589 citations, 3.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Pediatrics
406 citations, 2.3%
|
|
PLoS ONE
231 citations, 1.31%
|
|
BMC Pediatrics
194 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Children
184 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Nutrients
178 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Cureus
174 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Scientific Reports
157 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Perinatology
150 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Pediatric Research
134 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
129 citations, 0.73%
|
|
European Journal of Pediatrics
114 citations, 0.65%
|
|
American Journal of Perinatology
104 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
103 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
101 citations, 0.57%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
97 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
93 citations, 0.53%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
89 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Pediatrics
89 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Pediatric Pulmonology
88 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
86 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
74 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Pediatrics
73 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
69 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
68 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
67 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Pediatric Surgery International
66 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
62 citations, 0.35%
|
|
BMJ Case Reports
61 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Early Human Development
59 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Breastfeeding Medicine
57 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Diagnostics
54 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
53 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
51 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
49 citations, 0.28%
|
|
NeoReviews
48 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Journal of Pediatrics
48 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Pediatric Emergency Care
48 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition
47 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Clinics in Perinatology
47 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Neonatology
46 citations, 0.26%
|
|
BMJ Open
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
45 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
44 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pediatric Nephrology
43 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Pediatric Cardiology
42 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Archives de Pediatrie
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
BMC Public Health
40 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
40 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Cardiology in the Young
39 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
39 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
39 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pediatric Radiology
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pediatrics International
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
37 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Journal of Pediatrics
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Pediatrics
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
BMC Infectious Diseases
33 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
32 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Pediatric Neurology
31 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
31 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Child's Nervous System
31 citations, 0.18%
|
|
World Journal of Clinical Cases
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Neonatal Nursing
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Vaccine
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
BioMed Research International
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Antibiotics
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Translational Pediatrics
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Medicina
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Heliyon
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biomedicines
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Reactions Weekly
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Seminars in Perinatology
27 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Clinical Case Reports
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Neonatal Care
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Microorganisms
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Epilepsy and Behavior
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
24 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of International Medical Research
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
23 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Radiology Case Reports
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Viruses
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Clinical Pediatrics
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Environmental Research
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Antioxidants
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Child Neurology
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Neonatology
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advances in Clinical Medicine
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Elsevier
3994 citations, 22.63%
|
|
Springer Nature
2978 citations, 16.87%
|
|
Wiley
1495 citations, 8.47%
|
|
MDPI
1248 citations, 7.07%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
895 citations, 5.07%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
717 citations, 4.06%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
650 citations, 3.68%
|
|
SAGE
379 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
287 citations, 1.63%
|
|
BMJ
280 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
249 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
218 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Oxford University Press
201 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
200 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
152 citations, 0.86%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
150 citations, 0.85%
|
|
S. Karger AG
121 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
110 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
96 citations, 0.54%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
76 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Medknow
76 citations, 0.43%
|
|
IOS Press
70 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
68 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
66 citations, 0.37%
|
|
SciELO
65 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
63 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
50 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
41 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Physiological Society
38 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Hans Publishers
36 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Korean Pediatric Society
34 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
33 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
31 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
31 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IntechOpen
30 citations, 0.17%
|
|
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
XMLink
28 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
26 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Paediatrician Publishers LLC
25 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Acilim Yayincilik
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JMIR Publications
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
16 citations, 0.09%
|
|
SLACK
15 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Prism Books Pvt. Ltd
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Kowsar Medical Publishing Company
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Korean Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Microbiology Society
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOP Publishing
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
PeerJ
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society of Pediartic Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Emerald
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Japanese Circulation Society
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Impact Journals
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pediatric Pharmacology Advocacy Group, Inc.
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Union of the Medical Community National Medical Chamber
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Portland Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Oceanside Publications, Inc.
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brieflands
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lavoisier
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Chang Gung University
206 publications, 10.6%
|
|
National Taiwan University Hospital
129 publications, 6.64%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
96 publications, 4.94%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
85 publications, 4.37%
|
|
Taipei Medical University
79 publications, 4.07%
|
|
Mackay Memorial Hospital
76 publications, 3.91%
|
|
National Taiwan University
66 publications, 3.4%
|
|
China Medical University (Taiwan)
45 publications, 2.32%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
43 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
38 publications, 1.96%
|
|
National Defense Medical Center
30 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Fu Jen Catholic University
29 publications, 1.49%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
25 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Taipei Medical University Hospital
24 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Tzu Chi University
22 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Fudan University
12 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National University of Singapore
12 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Malaya
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Asia University
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Seoul National University
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Kyushu University
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Southern Medical University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hungkuang University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Hacettepe University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Gazi University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Soroka Medical Center
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Mahidol University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Zhejiang University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Xiamen University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Guangzhou Medical University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Toyama
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Tunis El Manar University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ankara University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Ege University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Turkey
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Başkent University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Jinan University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Yuan Ze University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Providence University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Yamanashi
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Florida
5 publications, 0.26%
|
|
King Saud University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Firat University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kirikkale University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Tunghai University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
George Washington University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Siriraj Hospital
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Korea University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Ulsan
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Pusan National University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Chonbuk National University Hospital
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Shandong University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kobe University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
McMaster University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Nagoya City University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Kurume University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Fukushima Medical University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Yamaguchi University
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Toronto
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Istanbul University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Erciyes University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Jilin University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Wuhan University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Capital Medical University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Medical University of Graz
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
China Medical University (Liaoning)
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Cairo University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Chang Gung University
66 publications, 8.11%
|
|
Taipei Medical University
24 publications, 2.95%
|
|
Kaohsiung Medical University
21 publications, 2.58%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
20 publications, 2.46%
|
|
Mackay Memorial Hospital
18 publications, 2.21%
|
|
National Taiwan University Hospital
17 publications, 2.09%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
12 publications, 1.47%
|
|
National Taiwan University
11 publications, 1.35%
|
|
National Defense Medical Center
11 publications, 1.35%
|
|
China Medical University (Taiwan)
9 publications, 1.11%
|
|
National University of Singapore
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Taipei Medical University Hospital
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
7 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
6 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Asia University
6 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Fudan University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Xiamen University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Mahidol University
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
5 publications, 0.61%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Malaya
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Southern Medical University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Guangzhou Medical University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Fu Jen Catholic University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Ankara University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Istanbul University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Health Sciences, Turkey
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Zhejiang University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Soroka Medical Center
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Jinan University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tunghai University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
George Washington University Hospital
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Siriraj Hospital
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Korea University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kobe University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kyushu University
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Tokyo Hospital
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Toyama
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
City of Hope National Medical Center
3 publications, 0.37%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Gazi University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Jilin University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hubei University of Medicine
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Capital Medical University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yuan Ze University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Providence University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
George Washington University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Pusan National University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Chonbuk National University Hospital
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Harvard University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Shandong University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Hospital Frankfurt
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University Medical Centre Mannheim
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Juntendo University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Fukushima Medical University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of the Ryukyus
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Dokkyo Medical University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Misr International University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tunis El Manar University
2 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Koc University
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Prince Sultan Military Medical City
1 publication, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
China
|
China, 1023, 52.65%
China
1023 publications, 52.65%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 99, 5.1%
Japan
99 publications, 5.1%
|
USA
|
USA, 90, 4.63%
USA
90 publications, 4.63%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 78, 4.01%
Turkey
78 publications, 4.01%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 43, 2.21%
Italy
43 publications, 2.21%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 43, 2.21%
Republic of Korea
43 publications, 2.21%
|
India
|
India, 32, 1.65%
India
32 publications, 1.65%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 24, 1.24%
Iran
24 publications, 1.24%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 24, 1.24%
Singapore
24 publications, 1.24%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 19, 0.98%
Canada
19 publications, 0.98%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 0.82%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 0.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 15, 0.77%
Germany
15 publications, 0.77%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 0.77%
Malaysia
15 publications, 0.77%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 14, 0.72%
Egypt
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 14, 0.72%
Israel
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 14, 0.72%
Spain
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 14, 0.72%
Thailand
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 13, 0.67%
Portugal
13 publications, 0.67%
|
France
|
France, 12, 0.62%
France
12 publications, 0.62%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 0.51%
Brazil
10 publications, 0.51%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 8, 0.41%
Romania
8 publications, 0.41%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 0.36%
Mexico
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 0.36%
Poland
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 6, 0.31%
Australia
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 6, 0.31%
Austria
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.31%
Greece
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.31%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 6, 0.31%
Saudi Arabia
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 6, 0.31%
Tunisia
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.26%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 4, 0.21%
Jordan
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.15%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.15%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.15%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.15%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.15%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 3, 0.15%
Ethiopia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.1%
Russia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.1%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.1%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.1%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.1%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.1%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.1%
UAE
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.1%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.1%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.05%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.05%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.05%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.05%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.05%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.05%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.05%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.05%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.05%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.05%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.05%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.05%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.05%
Finland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.05%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.05%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (30 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
China
|
China, 271, 33.29%
China
271 publications, 33.29%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 52, 6.39%
Japan
52 publications, 6.39%
|
USA
|
USA, 36, 4.42%
USA
36 publications, 4.42%
|
India
|
India, 17, 2.09%
India
17 publications, 2.09%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 17, 2.09%
Italy
17 publications, 2.09%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 16, 1.97%
Singapore
16 publications, 1.97%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 15, 1.84%
Republic of Korea
15 publications, 1.84%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 13, 1.6%
Turkey
13 publications, 1.6%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 11, 1.35%
Thailand
11 publications, 1.35%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 1.11%
Germany
9 publications, 1.11%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 7, 0.86%
Portugal
7 publications, 0.86%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 7, 0.86%
Israel
7 publications, 0.86%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 7, 0.86%
Canada
7 publications, 0.86%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.86%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.86%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 0.74%
Brazil
6 publications, 0.74%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 0.74%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 0.74%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 0.61%
Spain
5 publications, 0.61%
|
France
|
France, 4, 0.49%
France
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 4, 0.49%
Australia
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.49%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.49%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.49%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.37%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.37%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.25%
Iran
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.25%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.25%
UAE
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.25%
Romania
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.25%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.25%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.25%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.25%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.12%
Russia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.12%
Austria
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.12%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.12%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.12%
Greece
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.12%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.12%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.12%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.12%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.12%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.12%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.12%
Poland
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.12%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.12%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.12%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
2 profile journal articles
CHEN WEI-YU
13 publications,
96 citations
h-index: 6