IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
ISSN:
23255870, 23722533
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4
SJR
2.313
CiteScore
7.8
Categories
Computer Networks and Communications
Control and Optimization
Control and Systems Engineering
Signal Processing
Areas
Computer Science
Engineering
Mathematics
Years of issue
2014-2025
journal names
IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
IEEE T CONTROL NETW
Top-3 citing journals

IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
(1740 citations)

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
(1451 citations)

Automatica
(969 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Southeast University
(56 publications)

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
(51 publications)

Nanyang Technological University
(42 publications)

Southeast University
(51 publications)

Beihang University
(33 publications)

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
(31 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1520
Q3
Oceanographic features in the vicinity of Japaratuba Canyon, Sergipe, Brazil
Domingues E.D., Schettini C.A.
ABSTRACT This study presents an initial assessment of the hydrographic characteristics in the region of the Japaratuba Canyon on the continental shelf of Sergipe, Brazil. An oceanographic campaign was conducted, during which two high spatial resolution transects were made on the north and south sides of the canyon, along with a transverse transect. The results indicate that the hydrographic features are similar to those found on the continental shelf of Pernambuco, with the dominant water mass being Tropical Water. However, it differs in having a much greater influence from Coastal Water, as a result of the dispersion of the São Francisco River plume to the south and from small rivers that discharge into the northern portion of the continental shelf of the state of Sergipe. The near bottom turbidity and chlorophyll were relatively higher in the southern section, what can be an indication that the presence of the canyon can produce a localized upwelling effect, with the canyon playing a role in allowing the approach of water from the top of the nearest permanent thermocline to the coast.
Q3
Global sensitivity analysis in flood mapping using HEC-RAS 2D: effects of the floodplain manning coefficient for a dam-break case
Silva I.T., Santos H.A., Pereira L.C., Nascimento K.S.
ABSTRACT The flood map outputs from hydrodynamic models may contain uncertainties due to inaccuracies in the input parameters. On the other hand, the results of dam break models are crucial for performing risk analyses of potential material and social damage. Thus, this study applied a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to evaluate the effects of the floodplain Manning coefficient on the inundation generated by the hypothetical dam break of a real water dam in HEC-RAS 2D. Three aspects of flood output, the peak discharge, the arrival time and the time of flood damping, were analyzed via variance tests. The Manning coefficient varied from 0.026 to 0.150, resulting in a change of up to 54% in the peak discharge at a distance of 25 km and a delayed arrival time corresponding to 16 minutes in the cross section located 1 km downstream of the dam. However, Manning coefficients between 0.026 and 0.050 show statistically similar results in terms of two aspects (the peak discharge and the arrival time). This study indicated that the GSA and variance tests may contribute to critical analyses of Manning coefficient adoption and help decision-makers develop criteria for planning emergency actions.
Q3
Analysis of the impact of leaks and valve maneuvers on pressure transient data in water distribution networks
Sant’Anna M., Souza R.G., Prudente G., Brentan B., Meirelles G.
ABSTRACT Swift detection and repair of leaks in water distribution networks are essential to ensure the operational efficiency of the system. It’s not viable, both financially and technically, to scour the entire extension of the system to look for leaks, therefore it’s important to narrow down areas prone to leakage. Hydraulic techniques are useful to that end, since hydraulic data can be used to identify anomalies and guide efforts on field campaigns. Among these techniques, those based on the transient state are used to infer about the actual condition of the system by causing controlled disturbances, such as closing a valve, as to reveal anomalies like leaks, deposits or illegal connections. In this paper, the software OpenFlows Hammer, was used to model the transient state and generate the transient state data. This data was then analyzed based on signal theory. The results show that it’s possible to identify the presence of leaks, even minor ones, and their location in relation to the monitoring point. However, further studies are needed to better establish metrics relevant to characterize the behavior of the data in the frequency domain.
Q3
Application of machine learning models in predictive maintenance of Francis hydraulic turbines
Souza J.C., Honorato Júnior O., Tiago Filho G.L., Carpinteiro O.A., Biancardine Júnior H.S., Santos I.F.
ABSTRACT Cavitation is a phenomenon that reduces the useful life of hydraulic machines, taking place in function of the variation of the pressure gradient at a constant temperature. In hydraulic turbines, cavitation occurs when the turbine operates beyond nominal conditions, generating abnormal vibrations, erosion to blades and other key components, thus resulting in stoppage for maintenance. This article proposes a cavitation monitoring system based on the analysis of vibration spectra via two Machine Learning (ML) models: a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network and a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. Drawing upon vibration analysis and pressure coefficient parameter standards, such models are capable of identifying the vibratory state of a given machine, distinguishing its cavitating and non-cavitating states. Moreover, it is proposed that these models may estimate real conditions for turbine functioning, thus enabling planning for the most opportune moment to carry out turbine maintenance. Both ML models were evaluated through a series of experiments with data from a Francis turbine installed in Brazil, where vibration spectra and flow pressure coefficients were monitored; they identified cavitating and non-cavitating states with precision levels between 95% and 100%, thus demonstrating satisfactory performance and serving as an important step in the development of a system for monitoring hydropowers.
Q3
Proposal of resilience indices for water mains subject to hydraulic transients and case study in Franca (Brazil)
Silva J.V., Sierra D.A., Sodek D.B., Martim A.L., Dalfré Filho J.G., Luvizotto Junior E.
ABSTRACT Water main bursts not only lead to financial losses, but also water losses. Climate change and water resources scarcity puts in perspective the need to understand the conditions of the water transportation infrastructure to prevent accidents. The objective of this work is to present resilience indices related to the operation of the water system and infrastructure operational limits to aid decision maker to evaluate risk. The resilience indexes were established based on four indexes arising from transient flows simulation: burst pressure, minimum transient pressure, maximum air volume and resultant forces. Decision making on a complex problem with many parameters based on a simple index is not straightforward, therefore we used a multicriteria decision technique to assist, the simplified three-scale Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). To test the proposed method, a case study of a trunk main from the municipality of Franca, Brazil is presented. To calculate the indexes a hydraulic model with transient flows of the referred system was simulated. For the case study, a few scenarios were evaluated. The scenario where no protection devices are present is the most critical.
Q3
A comprehensive reservoir segmentation for hydrodynamics and water quality assessment
Goulart C.B., Carvalho J.M., Bernardo J.W., Polli B.A., Fernandes C., Fuchs S., Bleninger T.
ABSTRACT Reservoirs present different and intrinsic characteristics from the point of view of physical, chemical, and biological nature from other environmental systems. They therefore should be characterized differently for a better representation aiming for proper planning and management strategies. This paper analyzes eleven reservoirs and develops a classification and zonation strategy for those systems. First, temporal variation and statistical analysis are performed, followed by a residence time calculation, to assess the reservoir's dynamics. Next, stratification and spatial variation analysis are proposed to verify their necessity. Three of the reservoirs analyzed behave as lentic systems, with a high residence time. In addition, all three have significant tributaries, indicating the potential necessity of considering spatial variation for their classification, later verified in 3D modeling. Even if every reservoir is unique in its dynamics and characteristics, the classification scheme is suitable for different types of reservoirs, since it works like a decision tree, where input loads and hydrodynamics are considered.
Q3
Modeling a hypersaline lagoon to evaluate salinity changes due to morphology of an ocean connection
Carvalho A.C., Carvalho M.V., Trevisan C.L., Rosman P.C., Wasserman J.C.
ABSTRACT Araruama is a perennial hypersaline lagoon where seawater flows in through a narrow connection and spreads, where it is intensively evaporated. Although the inflow of seawater increases the salts load, a high inflow may reduce flushing time, decreasing salinity. Although reducing flushing time would improve water quality, the accompanying reduction in the salinity may change the ecological equilibrium. In the present research, a numeric hydrodynamic model was applied to Araruama Lagoon, to determine the maximum connection depth that promotes reduction of flushing time, however maintaining salinity. Five scenarios were executed in the hydrodynamic model SisBaHiA© with changing hydraulic area, including channel average depths of 2.5 m, 3.0 m, and 4.0 m. The salinity simulations outlined three segmented sectors, the first associated with the connection channel, but also affecting the proximal portion of the lagoon; the second is an intense evaporation area, with high salinity values, and the third, in the western portion of the lagoon where freshwater inputs can affect salinity. The tested channel bathymetry scenarios promoted a salinity increase with a channel depth of 3.0 meters. With a connection channel depth of 4.0 meters (highest hydraulic area), the threshold limit is attained, and salinities are reduced in the lagoon.
Q3
Multi-model ensemble for long-term statistical trend analysis of observed gridded precipitation and temperature data in the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil
Vasco G., Miranda R.D., Viana J.F., Bressiani D., Mendiondo E.M., Silva R.M., Galvíncio J.D., Silva S.F., Montenegro S.M.
ABSTRACT For effective management practices and decision-making, the uncertainties associated with regional climate models (RCMs) and their scenarios need to be assessed in the context of climate change. This study analyzes long-term trends in precipitation and temperature data sets (maximum and minimum values) from the NASA, Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Prediction (NEX-GDDP), under the São Francisco River Basin Representative Concentration Path (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5, using the REA (Reliable Ensemble Average) method. In each grid, the built multi-model was bias-corrected using the CMhyd software for annual, dry, wet, and pre-season periods – for historical (1961-2005) and future (2006-2100) periods. The multi-model and four different methods, namely: The Mann-Kendall, Mann-Kendall pre-brightening test, bias-corrected pre-brightening, and Spearman correlation, were used to detect trends in precipitation, and minimum and maximum temperature. In the analysis of precipitation and temperature metrics, the results for the NRMSD showed that, in general, the CSIRO model presented more satisfactory results in all physiographic regions. Person's correlation coefficient showed a better adjustment of precipitation for the MIROC5, EC.EARTH and NORESMI1 models, in areas of sub-medium and upper São Francisco. For the minimum temperature, the CSIRO and NORESMI1 models showed the best fit, in general. At maximum temperature, the EC.EARTH and CSIRO models showed more satisfactory results. With regard to trend analysis, the results indicated an increasing trend in mean annual temperature and precipitation across the basin. When analyzed by subregion, the results show an increasing trend in monthly average minimum and maximum temperatures in the middle and lower SFRB, while average monthly rainfall increases during the rainy season and preseason in Upper São Francisco. The results of this research can be used by government entities, such as Civil Defense, to subsidize decision-making that requires actions/measures to relocate people/communities to less risky locations to minimize risk or vulnerability situations for the population living nearby to the river.
Q3
Thresholds of human body stability in water flows: advances, challenges, and guidelines for flood risk management
Fagundes M.R., Fan F.M., Michel G.P., Kobiyama M., Vanelli F.M., Monteiro L.R., Campagnolo K., Loss J.F., Abatti B.H.
ABSTRACT The occurrence of floods causes hundreds of drowning deaths annually. Therefore, it is necessary to develop measures and risk management policies related to flood disasters. One approach is the definition of stability thresholds for individuals in water flows, as safety is compromised when people are exposed to flows that surpass their ability to stand or cross. Based on these considerations, the objective of the study was to conduct a literature review of experimental, empirical, and theoretical studies on this topic, evaluating stability thresholds for individuals exposed to water flow. In total, 34 studies conducted until the year 2023 were identified. Key factors influencing stability include water flow characteristics and the physical attributes of individuals. In addition to these factors, adverse conditions such as uneven terrain, poor lighting, and psychological factors were also considered important. However, it was noted that few studies have assessed such adverse conditions, and there is a gap in the experimental analysis of these variables. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of conducting more physical experiments to address these gaps, obtain a more comprehensive database, and improve precision in numerical and experimental models, ultimately supporting tools for flood risk management.
Q3
Comparison of evolutionary algorithms applied to optimal design of water distribution networks
Muranaka R.S., Rangel J.S., Marotta M.A., Soares A.K.
ABSTRACT The pursuit of efficient water distribution network (WDN) projects that reflect the complexities of real systems has spurred the development and application of various optimization techniques. Among these, multi and many-objective optimization hold particular significance due to the intrinsic interplay between variables within water distribution networks. Within this domain, evolutionary algorithms have emerged as a promising optimization option, offering a range of methodologies documented in the literature. To systematically evaluate these approaches, a methodology was devised to compare six evolutionary algorithms in the context of water distribution networks optimization: NSGA-II, NSGA-III, U-NSGA-III, R-NSGA-III, MOEA/D, and RVEA, using two distinct objective functions. The comparative analysis utilized as key metrics the efficiency criteria (E), cumulative distribution function (CDF), error statistics and algorithm complexity. The findings revealed that while most algorithms successfully converged to the known global optimum of the employed case study, NSGA-II and NSGA-III exhibited superior performance, notably in minimizing costs. These results demonstrate the efficacy of these algorithms in tackling the complexities inherent in water distribution networks optimization, positioning them as leading contenders in this field.
Q3
Dynamics of the water infiltration process in permeable pavement using in situ experimentation and numerical simulation with hydrus-2D
Costa I.R., Santos Neto S.M., Antonino A.C., Montenegro S.M., Coutinho A.P.
ABSTRACT This work presents a two-dimensional simulation of infiltration dynamics in a real permeable pavement (PP) structure in the city of Recife, representing more realistically the geometry of the infiltration bulb and the dynamics of water redistribution processes in the PP. Sixteen infiltration tests were carried out on the PP using the Beerkan method. The hydrodynamic parameters of the PP surface were determined by applying the inverse method to the infiltration data. Simulations of water transfer processes were carried out with Hydrus-2D using the hydrodynamic properties corresponding to the highest and lowest saturated hydraulic conductivity observed on the surface. Satisfactory infiltration characteristics were observed in the PP. The inverse method showed good adjustment capacity to the accumulated infiltration curves and estimation of hydrodynamic properties. Simulations using Hydrus-2D demonstrated that the infiltration process and water redistribution in the subgrade depend on the hydrodynamic properties of the coating.
Q3
Flow measurements with ADCP on the Guaíba River, during the highest water level recorded in history - May 2024 (floods in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)
Andrade M.M., Piazera M., Luz R.D., Nunes J.C., Scottá F., Silva T.
ABSTRACT This Technical Note aims to present data from in-situ measurements conducted with Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) under the highest level recorded in the Guaíba River. Flow measurements carried out on May 5th and 6th, with water levels of 5.27 and 5.25 m, resulted in average values of 30,180 and 29,852 m3/s, respectively. The profiles with the river flow are presented, as well as the water level readings at the Usina do Gasômetro gauges. These data can be accessed on a open platform, can contributes to the understanding of the Guaíba's hydrodynamics and the flooding at Patos Lagoon and can provide valuable information for modeling maximum flow scenarios in these systems.
Q3
Effects of applied water depth and soil water storage uniformity on irrigation quality and crop yield
Gonçalves A.C., Rezende R., Camargo A.P., Frizzone J.A., Folegatti M.V., Wenneck G.S.
ABSTRACT The quality of water distribution and the coefficients that express water use efficiency are evaluated from the distribution of the irrigation depth (I). However, a hypothesis has been proposed that it may be more effective to base these analyses on the water depth stored in the soil profile (H), after irrigation. To evaluate this hypothesis, in a very clayey soil, bean was cultivated under irrigation by conventional sprinkling, with four scenarios of water application uniformity. During the crop cycle, irrigations were carried out, scheduled according to a lower limit of soil-water potential. The four scenarios were associated with 64, 144, 192 and 256 experimental points, which were characterized as having excellent (S1), adequate (S2), inadequate (S3) and unacceptable (S4) uniformity, according to obtained values of Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CUC) and distribution uniformity coefficient (DUC). At the end of the cycle, harvest was carried out in each grid, obtaining the crop yield. The uniformity of water distribution in the soil negatively impact crop yield only in S4, with an unacceptable water application pattern. The irrigation quality analysis based on values of H is more consistent with the results observed for the crop than the analysis based on the applied water depth.
Q3
Chemical and isotopic changes in surface and underground waters in a Watershed in the Central Amazon
Bastos A.S., Ferreira S.J., Gastmans D., Freitas E.P., Brito A.P., Almeida C.N., Duvoisin Junior S.
ABSTRACT Environmental monitoring of water is essential for efficient management of water source conservation in river basins. However, there is a lack of studies with this synergy applying unconventional techniques. We evaluated chemical characteristics of surface and underground waters (2021-2022), including for the first time the analysis of the isotopic composition of waters collected from water sources throughout Educandos`s Basin, in the city of Manaus-AM/Brazil, to evaluate chemical-isotopic changes in the view of anthropogenic impacts. Statistical analyzes were used to compare means, graphical analyzes and Principal Component Analysis to identify the main patterns of the data sets. Our results demonstrated a significant increase in pH, electrical conductivity and an increased in nitrates in polluted groundwater and reduced DO in contaminated surface waters. Furthermore, the isotopic signature did not indicate pollution through changes in the isotopic composition of natural and polluted waters, however, it showed more depleted signatures in one of the underground monitoring wells, indicating an impact site vulnerable to the interaction of aquifer waters with Rio Negro and Igarapé. When analyzing chemical parameters with isotopic composition, it can be allowed a better understanding of the mechanisms of circulation and mineralization of underground and surface waters in the Urban Hydrographic Basin.
Q3
A new Integrated Water Quality Index (IWQI) and your application with emergent pollutants in the Atlantic Forest biome basin in southern Brazil
Alves T.C., Jenske G., Cardozo A., Pinheiro A.
ABSTRACT The presence of emerging contaminants in surface water is a growing concern, as these substances are not typically monitored by environmental quality systems, potentially leading to the consumption of contaminated water. In this study, the presence of caffeine, an emerging contaminant that is ingested solely by humans and is present in surface water due to its chemical characteristics, was investigated as a potential indicator of anthropogenic contamination in the Itajaí-Açu River in the southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. Additionally, twelve other emerging pollutants were examined in the Itajaí-Açu River, including estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), ethinylestradiol (EE2), estriol (E3), prednisone (PD), hexestrol (HEX), acetaminophen (ACM), Oxytetracicline (OC). Surface water samples were collected over five months and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. The results revealed that caffeine was present in 84% of the analyzed samples, and emerging pollutants were present in all monitored municipalities. The study also investigated the relationship between an integrated water quality index, the magnitudes and occurrences of caffeine, and land use. The emerging pollutants Estrone, Ethinylestradiol, Hexestrol, Naproxen and Oxytetracycline were not detected in the analyzed samples. However, Ibuprofen, Tetracycline, Prednisone, and Acetaminophen were present in 44% and 36% of the samples, respectively, with Estriol, Ketoprofen, and Estradiol having a lower occurrence. The mean concentrations of Estradiol, Estriol, Ketoprofen, Acetaminophen, and Ibuprofen were 0.08 µg L-1, 0.23 µg L-1, 0.15 µg L-1, 0.42 µg L-1, and 0.44 µg L-1, respectively, and were higher than previously reported. The concentration range of caffeine during the study was <0.10 to 1.48 µg L-1, with the mean concentration being 0.30 µg L-1. These findings highlight the presence of emerging pollutants in the Itajaí-Açu River and the need for continued monitoring and regulatory legislation to protect surface water quality in Brazil.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
1740 citations, 5.73%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
1451 citations, 4.78%
|
|
Automatica
969 citations, 3.19%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
690 citations, 2.27%
|
|
IEEE Access
661 citations, 2.18%
|
|
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
641 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Journal of the Franklin Institute
566 citations, 1.86%
|
|
IFAC-PapersOnLine
542 citations, 1.79%
|
|
IEEE Control Systems Letters
516 citations, 1.7%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
501 citations, 1.65%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
491 citations, 1.62%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
471 citations, 1.55%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
445 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Information Sciences
326 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Neurocomputing
240 citations, 0.79%
|
|
IET Control Theory and Applications
218 citations, 0.72%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs
217 citations, 0.71%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
209 citations, 0.69%
|
|
ISA Transactions
208 citations, 0.69%
|
|
International Journal of Systems Science
206 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Systems and Control Letters
198 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Electric Power Systems Research
195 citations, 0.64%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
189 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Energies
189 citations, 0.62%
|
|
International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
181 citations, 0.6%
|
|
IEEE Systems Journal
177 citations, 0.58%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
176 citations, 0.58%
|
|
International Journal of Control
157 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Nonlinear Dynamics
147 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Asian Journal of Control
146 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Applied Energy
145 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Annual Reviews in Control
144 citations, 0.47%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
137 citations, 0.45%
|
|
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
135 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Sensors
131 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
125 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Computation
125 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks
124 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
124 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
120 citations, 0.4%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
118 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems
115 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
103 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
103 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Mathematics
102 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Scientific Reports
99 citations, 0.33%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
90 citations, 0.3%
|
|
European Journal of Control
87 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
82 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
79 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
79 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
79 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
77 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
76 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Science China Information Sciences
75 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution
75 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
75 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
74 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
73 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Chaos
66 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems
66 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
66 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity
63 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
63 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
63 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
62 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
61 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
59 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Ocean Engineering
58 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Sustainability
56 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks
55 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
54 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Complexity
51 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energy
50 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Aerospace Science and Technology
49 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
48 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Neural Networks
47 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Control Engineering Practice
47 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Optimal Control Applications and Methods
45 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
45 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Dynamic Games and Applications
44 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
43 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Proceedings of the IEEE
42 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
42 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
40 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences
36 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Entropy
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IET Renewable Power Generation
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Signal Processing
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Drones
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Energy Reports
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
28 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
16399 citations, 54.01%
|
|
Elsevier
5778 citations, 19.03%
|
|
Springer Nature
2086 citations, 6.87%
|
|
Wiley
1183 citations, 3.9%
|
|
MDPI
941 citations, 3.1%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
564 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
457 citations, 1.51%
|
|
SAGE
209 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
189 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
185 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
149 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
142 citations, 0.47%
|
|
IOP Publishing
111 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
105 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Science in China Press
89 citations, 0.29%
|
|
AIP Publishing
86 citations, 0.28%
|
|
World Scientific
85 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Control Association
70 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Oxford University Press
58 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
57 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
55 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
54 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Annual Reviews
51 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
46 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
41 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
25 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
24 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IGI Global
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
22 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Royal Society
22 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
22 citations, 0.07%
|
|
ASME International
20 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Emerald
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Tech Science Press
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IWA Publishing
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Arizona State University
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexandria University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SAE International
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Hans Publishers
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Steklov Mathematical Institute
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Information Processing Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Institute of Communications Information Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Education and Upbringing Publishing
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Wilmington Scientific Publishers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
1 citation, 0%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Korea Soc of Automotive Engineers, Inc
1 citation, 0%
|
|
The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Copernicus
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
1 citation, 0%
|
|
China University of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 citation, 0%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0%
|
|
DEStech Publications
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
1 citation, 0%
|
|
New Technologies Publishing House
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information - VINITI RAS
1 citation, 0%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
1 citation, 0%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
1 citation, 0%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Southeast University
56 publications, 3.47%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
51 publications, 3.16%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
42 publications, 2.6%
|
|
Beihang University
38 publications, 2.36%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
35 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
33 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
32 publications, 1.98%
|
|
Northeastern University
31 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
30 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Tongji University
29 publications, 1.8%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
28 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
27 publications, 1.67%
|
|
University of Groningen
26 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
24 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Michigan
24 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
24 publications, 1.49%
|
|
ETH Zurich
23 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
23 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Boston University
23 publications, 1.43%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
22 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Tsinghua University
21 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
20 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Zhejiang University
19 publications, 1.18%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
19 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Padua
19 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
19 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
18 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Southern California
18 publications, 1.12%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
17 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Shandong University
17 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
16 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Purdue University
16 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Stanford University
15 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
15 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Minnesota
15 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Alberta
15 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
15 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
14 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
14 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Arizona State University
14 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
14 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Imperial College London
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Melbourne
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Texas A&M University
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Cyprus
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Cornell University
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
New York University
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
McGill University
12 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Peking University
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Central South University
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Florida
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
11 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Uppsala University
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Columbia University
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Toronto
10 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Australian National University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Shanghai University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Michigan State University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Ohio State University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Chongqing University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Virginia Tech
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Washington
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Kyoto University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Lehigh University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Tiangong University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Anhui University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Campus Bio-Medico University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Princeton University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
North Carolina State University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Northwestern University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Harvard University
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Texas at Dallas
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Waterloo
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
7 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Southeast University
51 publications, 4.81%
|
|
Beihang University
33 publications, 3.11%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
31 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
31 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
29 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Northeastern University
29 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Tongji University
28 publications, 2.64%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
20 publications, 1.89%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
18 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
18 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
17 publications, 1.6%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
17 publications, 1.6%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 1.6%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
17 publications, 1.6%
|
|
University of Groningen
17 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Tsinghua University
16 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
16 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
16 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Zhejiang University
15 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
15 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
15 publications, 1.41%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
15 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Shandong University
15 publications, 1.41%
|
|
ETH Zurich
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Michigan
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Purdue University
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
13 publications, 1.23%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
13 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Alberta
13 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
13 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Southern California
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Central South University
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Peking University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Imperial College London
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Boston University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Minnesota
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Shanghai University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Padua
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Stanford University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
New York University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Texas A&M University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Michigan State University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Cornell University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Cyprus
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Chongqing University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tiangong University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Anhui University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Newcastle Australia
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Virginia Tech
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
South China University of Technology
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Australian National University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Hebei University of Technology
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Qingdao University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Lehigh University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Florida
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Qatar University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Uppsala University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Nankai University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Southwest University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Western Sydney University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 644, 39.93%
USA
644 publications, 39.93%
|
China
|
China, 537, 33.29%
China
537 publications, 33.29%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 91, 5.64%
Sweden
91 publications, 5.64%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 90, 5.58%
Italy
90 publications, 5.58%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 79, 4.9%
Canada
79 publications, 4.9%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 72, 4.46%
Australia
72 publications, 4.46%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 62, 3.84%
United Kingdom
62 publications, 3.84%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 62, 3.84%
Netherlands
62 publications, 3.84%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 55, 3.41%
Germany
55 publications, 3.41%
|
France
|
France, 53, 3.29%
France
53 publications, 3.29%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 53, 3.29%
Singapore
53 publications, 3.29%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 42, 2.6%
Japan
42 publications, 2.6%
|
India
|
India, 39, 2.42%
India
39 publications, 2.42%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 33, 2.05%
Switzerland
33 publications, 2.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 25, 1.55%
Republic of Korea
25 publications, 1.55%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 18, 1.12%
Israel
18 publications, 1.12%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 16, 0.99%
Cyprus
16 publications, 0.99%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 15, 0.93%
Spain
15 publications, 0.93%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 14, 0.87%
Iran
14 publications, 0.87%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 11, 0.68%
Qatar
11 publications, 0.68%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 11, 0.68%
Saudi Arabia
11 publications, 0.68%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 9, 0.56%
Russia
9 publications, 0.56%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 0.43%
Greece
7 publications, 0.43%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 0.37%
Belgium
6 publications, 0.37%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.37%
UAE
6 publications, 0.37%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.31%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.31%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 0.31%
Turkey
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.25%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.25%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 0.25%
Norway
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.19%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.19%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.12%
Austria
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.12%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.12%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.12%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.12%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.12%
Chile
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.12%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.06%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.06%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0.06%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.06%
Poland
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.06%
Finland
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (16 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
China
|
China, 461, 43.45%
China
461 publications, 43.45%
|
USA
|
USA, 359, 33.84%
USA
359 publications, 33.84%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 52, 4.9%
Italy
52 publications, 4.9%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 50, 4.71%
Australia
50 publications, 4.71%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 46, 4.34%
Canada
46 publications, 4.34%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 42, 3.96%
Sweden
42 publications, 3.96%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 37, 3.49%
Singapore
37 publications, 3.49%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 34, 3.2%
Germany
34 publications, 3.2%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 34, 3.2%
United Kingdom
34 publications, 3.2%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 30, 2.83%
Netherlands
30 publications, 2.83%
|
India
|
India, 27, 2.54%
India
27 publications, 2.54%
|
France
|
France, 25, 2.36%
France
25 publications, 2.36%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 24, 2.26%
Japan
24 publications, 2.26%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 21, 1.98%
Switzerland
21 publications, 1.98%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 19, 1.79%
Republic of Korea
19 publications, 1.79%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 15, 1.41%
Spain
15 publications, 1.41%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 12, 1.13%
Iran
12 publications, 1.13%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 1.04%
Israel
11 publications, 1.04%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 0.75%
Russia
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 8, 0.75%
Qatar
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 7, 0.66%
Cyprus
7 publications, 0.66%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.47%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 5, 0.47%
Saudi Arabia
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.38%
Greece
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 4, 0.38%
Pakistan
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.38%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.28%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.28%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.28%
Norway
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.19%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.19%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.19%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.19%
UAE
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.19%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.09%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.09%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0.09%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.09%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.09%
Poland
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.09%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.09%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.09%
Finland
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.09%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (13 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
2 profile journal articles
Minh Hoang
81 publications,
821 citations
h-index: 15