Journal of Central South University of Technology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Journal of Central South University of Technology
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Central South University
(922 citations)

Journal of Central South University of Technology
(706 citations)

Advanced Materials Research
(300 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Central South University
(1207 publications)

Hunan University
(103 publications)

Xiangtan University
(52 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 277
Q1

Exploring the complexities of thesis writing in the distance mode: postgraduate students’ perspectives, challenges and strategies
Yunus M., Bachtiar B.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to explore the complexities faced by postgraduate students at Universitas Terbuka (UT) during their thesis writing process in a distance learning environment, focusing on their perspectives, challenges and strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe research employed a mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design, incorporating both quantitative data from 146 online questionnaire responses and qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with 16 students. This comprehensive methodology enabled a detailed examination of the students' experiences. The participants were from seven study programs in the Postgraduate Schools of UT.FindingsThe study identifies key themes impacting thesis writing in a distance learning context, including self-discipline, time management, access to resources, technological adaptation, feelings of isolation, motivation and supervisory interaction. The findings highlight the critical role of structured support systems, technological infrastructure and adaptive strategies such as online study groups and productivity tools in mitigating these challenges. Regular, constructive feedback from supervisors and the establishment of a supportive academic community are crucial for student success.Research limitations/implicationsThe research emphasizes the need for educational institutions to enhance their digital platforms and provide comprehensive training to bridge the gap in resource accessibility and technological proficiency. Further studies could expand on the specific needs of different demographic groups within the distance learning framework.Practical implicationsInstitutions should implement targeted interventions such as time management workshops, regular mentoring sessions, and the development of interactive and collaborative online platforms to support distance learners effectively.Social implicationsBy addressing the unique challenges of thesis writing in distance education, this study contributes to improving academic outcomes and enhancing the overall learning experience for postgraduate students, fostering a more inclusive and supportive educational environment.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights into the specific experiences of postgraduate students at UT, offering actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers to support thesis writing in distance learning contexts.
Q1

The antecedents of online teaching anxiety among university lecturers in Thailand: a mixed-methods investigation
Aba Shaar M.Y., Waluyo B., Rofiah N.L., Singhasuwan P., Tongumpa K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe study examined the antecedents of lecturers' online teaching anxiety and analyzed their relationships with variables such as gender, age, education, teaching experience and faculty.Design/methodology/approachUsing a mixed-methods design, the study involved 115 university lecturers through surveys and 15 through semi-structured interviews, with data analyzed via mixed-methods approaches.FindingsPersonal matters and digital literacy caused the lowest anxiety, teaching methods and classroom management triggered moderate anxiety, and teaching context and health factors provoked the highest. Female lecturers experienced greater health-related anxiety due to prolonged screen time. Education lecturers reported lower anxiety than science lecturers, whose laboratory-based content was harder to adapt to online teaching.Originality/valueLecturers' online teaching anxiety stemmed from six factors: digital literacy, teaching context, teaching methods, class management, health and personal matters. Institutional and social support have been identified as crucial for improving well-being and reducing anxiety.
Q1

The nexus between teacher trainees’ digital literacy and online learning motivation
Ahmed M.M., Sultana M., Md. Rokonuzzaman, Hossain M.K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study examined the relationship between levels of digital literacy and the online learning motivation (OLM) of teacher trainees across various factors.Design/methodology/approachThis investigation utilized a quantitative research approach. The sample was selected through a purposive method and consisted of 485 teacher trainees from the School of Education at Bangladesh Open University (BOU). Participants' digital literacy and OLM were assessed using validated five-point Likert scale questionnaires, consisting of 17 items for digital literacy and six items for OLM. The collection of data was conducted via a cross-sectional survey. Descriptive analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, t-test and ANOVA were employed for the purpose of data analysis.FindingsThe findings demonstrated that teacher trainees possessed sufficient digital literacy and OLM concerning the specified variables. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between digital literacy and OLM. BOU can evaluate all of these findings to make a rational decision regarding the development of its teacher education programs.Originality/valueThis exploratory study has yielded significant insights into the demographic characteristics, computer and internet skills, virtual learning skills and OLM of teacher trainees, thereby enhancing the existing body of knowledge in this field.
Q1

The efficacy of Telegram Messenger as a tool for enhancing argumentative writing among students in open and distance learning
Md Yusof N., Abdullah A.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis paper explores the effectiveness of using Telegram Messenger as a tool to enhance argumentative writing skills among open and distance learning (ODL) students. The paper outlines that argumentative writing is a crucial skill, particularly in written discourse, and that teaching it to ODL students presents unique challenges compared to traditional classroom settings.Design/methodology/approachThis quasi-experimental study was conducted on first-year ODL students in a Malaysian tertiary institution to measure the effectiveness of using Telegram Messenger to improve argumentative writing skills. The study used convenient sampling, with pre- and post-tests administered to both control and experimental groups, and the results were analyzed using paired sample t-tests. Additionally, qualitative data were gathered from six selected students, ensuring rigorous analysis and elimination of confounding variables by assigning the same writing tasks to all participants.FindingsThe findings of this paper suggest that students in the experimental group showed significant improvement in their argumentative writing skills, as evidenced by higher post-test scores compared to the control group. Qualitative feedback from selected students indicated that Telegram Messenger encouraged participation and made the writing process more engaging and interactive.Research limitations/implicationsThe study involved a relatively small sample size of 60 students from two cases and lasted only 10 weeks. Thus, the findings might not be generalizable to all ODL students. A longer study duration will provide findings on the long-term effects of using Telegram Messenger on argumentative writing skills. Factors such as age, educational background, language proficiency and prior experience in online learning could yield different results.Practical implicationsFor educators and institutions involved in online education, this research highlights the potential of integrating digital platforms like Telegram Messenger into their teaching strategies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes, particularly in areas such as writing skills development. It also underscores the importance of adapting teaching methods to suit the unique needs and challenges of ODL students. Moreover, incorporating Telegram in ODL writing classrooms can foster a dynamic, interactive environment that supports both individual and collaborative learning.Social implicationsODL has become increasingly popular, especially with the rise of digital communication platforms. This study delves into how such platforms, like Telegram Messenger, can be utilized to enhance the learning experience for ODL students. By leveraging technology, educational opportunities can potentially be extended to individuals who may not have access to traditional classroom settings due to geographical, financial or other constraints.Originality/valueThe originality and value of this study lie in its focus on using Telegram Messenger, a widely accessible and familiar digital platform, to address the unique challenges ODL students face in developing argumentative writing skills in ODL. By employing a quasi-experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative analyses, the study provides robust evidence of Telegram’s effectiveness as a tool to improve engagement and writing outcomes, distinguishing it from traditional methods and other digital platforms that may lack the immediacy or interactivity Telegram offers.
Q1

Breaking the isolation: how influential is co-creation in open and distance learning on the use of new media?
Chakravarty R., Baruah A., Sarma N.N.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeIn the open and distance learning (ODL) system, widely scattered learners across various age groups often feel isolated. New-age media-enabled co-creation can help reduce this isolation. However, fostering collaborative academic engagement to break this isolation presents challenges for ODL institutions. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of the ODL teachers and learners on this issue is essential.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted the triangulation method, collecting primary data from 198 learners at Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open University (KKHSOU). A focus group discussion with members of the academic staff provided qualitative insights. The instrument consisted of 23 statement items and was statistically analyzed using factor analysis, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests with SPSS version 26.0.FindingsCollaborative academic engagements were found to be significantly influenced by differences in the perceptions of learners across age groups towards the academic delivery process and new-age media platforms. Various dimensions like learner genuineness and effectiveness of support services also have implications for reducing isolation.Originality/valueThis study opens new avenues in the literature on co-creation and new-age media platforms in the context of ODL. This provides useful insights to educators on breaking isolation among the learners and involves them in the academic processes. The human approach as always will remain enduring.
Q1

Research on the transmission of the Open University of Japan courses via multi-device apps oriented to the learning ecosystem
Kodama H., Suzuki M.T., Yaginuma Y.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose the need for an integrated system for the production, authoring, addition and revision of webcast content and a multi-device apps mechanism with rights management for Internet transmission in the perspective of the OUJ course reuse.Design/methodology/approachThis paper designs systems that reuse the existing OUJ courses from the viewpoint of effective utilization, combine broadcasting lectures and online lectures of the OUJ courses and seamlessly link them as media-mix contents. In contrast to content development methodologies that assume embedded content production, this paper’s methodology takes an approach to producing and authoring webcasting content, flexibly adding and revising the content and transmitting that content over the internet via multi-device apps, taking rights management into account.FindingsThere is concern about the ELSI arising from the use of generative AI. It is directed at web content. This paper can contribute to resolving the ELSI surrounding the use of generative AI because it discusses a method of learning content development that clarifies the attribution of rights to content.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper lies in the fact that it is oriented to reuse existing lectures of the OUJ courses and simplify the rights clearance for them, from the perspective of the learning ecosystem. The value of this paper is that it can also serve as a technical and legal response to the production, authoring and Internet transmission of open university courses in the era of generative AI.
Q1

Advancing open education through open-source software: examining UTAUT 2 factors in adoption and implementation
Duan C.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to examine the factors influencing university students' adoption of open-source software (OSS) within the context of open educational practices (OEP) by applying an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT 2) model.Design/methodology/approachThe research employs a quantitative approach, gathering data from 156 students at Hong Kong Metropolitan University through an online survey. The survey was designed to test nine hypotheses derived from the UTAUT 2 model, incorporating additional constructs relevant to OSS. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to analyse the data and test the relationships between constructs.FindingsThe results indicate that Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Price Value (PV), Self-Efficacy (SE) and Value Alignment (VA) significantly influence students' Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt OSS. Conversely, Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Hedonic Motivation (HM) and Habit (HT) were not significant predictors. The findings suggest that while UTAUT 2 provides a useful framework for understanding OSS adoption, it requires adaptation to fully capture the unique characteristics of OSS in educational settings.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by extending the UTAUT 2 model to the context of OSS adoption in higher education, highlighting the importance of economic factors and user alignment with OSS values. The results offer practical insights for higher education institutions aiming to promote OSS, emphasizing the need for support structures, training, and the promotion of OSS’s economic and collaborative benefits.
Q1

Resisting technological solutionism in open universities in the time of global digital convergence
Lim D.C., Mat H., Yusooff F.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis purpose of this paper is to explore the future of open universities (OUs), particularly in developing Asia, focusing on the potential risks associated with technological solutionism, or the popular belief that educational problems can be readily solved through technological means. This exploration is pertinent as the initial advantages that OUs once held have significantly diminished and competing higher education institutions worldwide are converging on a digital future.Design/methodology/approachThe qualitative method of empathy-based stories (MEBS) was employed as the primary research method for drawing data from sampled OU teachers. The obtained data were parsed via textual analysis and the lens of critical discourses on technology and higher education.FindingsThe study shows that, in the future envisioned by the sampled OU teachers, students’ lack of privileged access to frontier technologies is no barrier to learning success. It also emphasises that learning outcomes have causality beyond technological determinism, and that educational problems, which OUs may deem as requiring technological solutions, are often non-technological in nature and require no technological fixes.Originality/valueCritiques of techno-solutionism, such as the present study, are virtually absent in the context of OUs in developing Asia. For this very reason, this study is vital and serves as a guardrail while these OUs seek to reformulate their respective value propositions in the time of global digital convergence.
Q1

Societal bonds in virtual spaces: exploring the sense of community in online student communities at Anadolu University’s Open Education System
Uçar M., Güler E., Koçdar S.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the levels of the sense of community among students enrolled in online student communities at Anadolu University Open Education System (OES), as well as their motivations for joining these communities and their expectations.Design/methodology/approachAn explanatory sequential design incorporating mixed research methods was employed as the research framework for this study. Quantitative data were collected from 1,065 students enrolled in online student communities during the 2021–2022 academic year, while qualitative data were obtained from 14 students after the survey using an extreme case sampling method. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance tests, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.FindingsThe study results indicate that students enrolled in online student communities generally have higher levels of a sense of community. These levels did not significantly differ based on gender, employment status, entry type to the university, program studied or membership status in more than one community. However, significant differences were observed in terms of age, time spent in communities and meeting attendance. Additionally, students' perceptions of social presence had a significant effect on their sense of community.Originality/valueThis study is the first to investigate the sense of community in online student communities at Anadolu University's OES.
Q1

Demystifying the way libraries support distance learning: a bibliometric analysis of scholarly communication in distance libraries
Papachristopoulos L.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on bibliometric research on the activities and services offered by distance libraries that serve distance learning institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis of scholarly communication has always been a valuable tool for researchers and policymakers in order to understand trends, gaps and patterns in a specific field. In this paper, a bibliometric analysis has been applied based on a well-known bibliometric tool called “VOSviewer.” The articles that constitute the dataset of current research were drawn from two journals: the Journal of Library Administration and the Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning.FindingsThe bibliometric analysis applied in distance libraries showed that the researchers in this domain are mainly introverts and need to prioritize engaging in the scientific research process over merely publishing good practices. Although there are a lot of libraries serving distance learning institutions (formal and non-formal), there is a notable lack of activity in the scientific publication field.Originality/valueDistance libraries have played a significant role in supporting distance learning, and since distance education has become more important in the educational ecosystem, the analysis of its scholarly production would provide administrators, researchers and policymakers with insights for the next era of conventional libraries.
Q1

Enhancing online learning: a systematic literature review exploring the impact of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes
Din Eak A., Annamalai N.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Purpose This systematic literature review paper critically examines the effectiveness of screencast feedback compared with text feedback in promoting student learning outcomes in online higher education. This paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion surrounding feedback modalities and their impact on online learning environments.Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a systematic review approach to synthesise and analyse existing studies investigating the use of screencast feedback in online higher education settings. A comprehensive search and selection process was employed to identify relevant literature. The selected studies were then analysed for their methodologies, findings and implications. This paper seeks to provide an overview of the current state of research, highlighting the benefits, challenges and potential impacts of screencast feedback on student learning outcomes.Findings The findings of this paper suggest that while there is a positive perception of screencast feedback among students and instructors, drawing definitive conclusions about its superiority over text feedback remains at the very beginning. Students generally appreciate the personalised, supportive and engaging nature of screencast feedback, particularly within the online learning context. However, challenges such as technical barriers and potential workload implications for instructors are also noted. Further empirical research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the comparative efficacy of screencast feedback, considering factors like online engagement, digital literacy and the impact on diverse student populations.Research limitations/implications This review underscores the acute necessity for expansive and meticulously designed studies that can provide conclusive insights into the authentic potential of screencast feedback and its resonance within the unique landscape of online learning. Through rigorous inquiry, educators can discern the optimal strategies for harnessing the advantages of screencast feedback to enhance student learning outcomes, aligning harmoniously with the dynamics of virtual classrooms.Practical implications Screencast feedback emerges as a promising avenue to foster meaningful connections between instructors and learners. The review highlights that screencast feedback engenders a more dialogic interaction between lecturers and students, resulting in personalised, supportive and engaging feedback experiences.Social implications The systematic review conducted underscores the positive reception of screencast feedback from both students and lecturers in this context. The findings are consistent with the principles of social constructivist theory, suggesting that the interactive and personalised nature of screencast feedback facilitates a richer educational experience for students, even within the confines of virtual classrooms (Vygotsky, 1978).Originality/value This innovative blend of methodologies contributes new insights that can inform educational practices and pedagogical strategies in online learning environments.
Q1

A flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules to enhance students' self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills: a conceptual framework and its implementation
Suwardika G., Sopandi A.T., Indrawan I.P., Masakazu K.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeIn the era of Industry 4.0, the relevance of webinar tutorials, a form of distance learning, is paramount. These tutorials can catalyze self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills, especially for prospective and in-service teachers pursuing higher education. This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework and report the results of implementing a flipped classroom with whiteboard animation and modules. This innovative approach seeks to enhance students' self-regulation, critical thinking and communication abilities.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs a mixed-methods approach. In the first phase, a hypothetical model and conceptual framework for the Flipped Classroom with Whiteboard Animation and Modules were developed to enhance self-regulation, critical thinking and communication skills. The resulting conceptual framework was then implemented through a quasi-experiment using a non-equivalent control group design involving 83 elementary school teachers enrolled in the Elementary School Science Education course (PDGK4202), divided into three treatment groups. Qualitative data were collected through observations of the learning process, documentation of student worksheet completion and interviews with students. Questionnaires and tests were used as instruments for quantitative data collection. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive methods, while quantitative data were evaluated using MANCOVA.FindingsThe findings demonstrate significant improvements in students' self-regulation, critical thinking skills and communication abilities after implementing the Flipped Classroom with Whiteboard Animation and Modules.Research limitations/implicationsSome limitations in this study need to be recognized. These limitations include the specific sample type of elementary school teachers who went back to college to take science learning courses in elementary school. Teachers have various diversity that may affect the dependent variable, such as age, educational background, facilities, internet signal stability at their learning location and teaching experience. This study was conducted in a specific context (using the flipped classroom model at UT), so the results may need to be more generalizable to other educational contexts with different facilities, systems and policies. In addition, the measurement of self-regulation and communication skills, particularly with questionnaires, relies on self-report, which can be biased due to socially desirable responses or inaccurate self-assessment. Although the MANCOVA test showed significant results, it is possible that other variables not controlled for in this study (e.g. intrinsic motivation, social support from family or colleagues) also affected the independent variables.Practical implicationsThis study emphasizes the importance of adapting webinar tutorials for Industry 4.0 and enhancing self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills, particularly for working students and teachers. It offers a practical framework for educators and suggests ways to improve online learning materials. The implementation results show significant skill enhancement. These findings have practical implications for educators, institutions and instructional designers, guiding the development of effective distance learning strategies and curriculum improvements in the digital age.Social implicationsThe social implications of this study are noteworthy. In the context of Industry 4.0, adapting webinar tutorials to promote self-regulated learning, critical thinking and communication skills is essential not only for the educational sector but also for the broader society. It equips prospective and in-service teachers, who are pivotal in shaping future generations, with the necessary skills to navigate a rapidly changing digital landscape. Furthermore, enhancing self-regulation and critical thinking abilities among employed students contributes to a more informed and adaptable workforce, fostering societal resilience in the face of technological advancements.Originality/valueThe uniqueness of this study stems from the creative modification of a webinar tutorial, which specifically targets the urgent requirement for enhancing abilities among teachers and university students. The conceptual framework serves as a valuable tool for educators, and the findings of this study confirm its effectiveness in enhancing self-regulation, critical thinking abilities and communication proficiency. Furthermore, the recommendations offered also furnish practical insights to improve this model.
Q1

Student experiences of agile-blended learning in emergency online education: insights from a participatory case study
Wong J.M.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study examined the implementation of an agile-blended learning (ABL) approach in a master-level early childhood research course and assessed its impact on the learning experience. The purpose was to understand how incorporating ABL concepts affected flexibility, learner autonomy, collaboration and technology mediation, the core principles of ABL.Design/methodology/approachA participatory case study methodology was employed to gather insights from 40 students regarding their experiences in the redesigned research course. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and quantitative data descriptively analyzed.FindingsABL fostered flexibility, convenience and learner autonomy. However, students desired richer interpersonal interactions. Technological integration enhanced learning, but social presence was lacking.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was limited to a specific master-level early childhood education course and focused on a particular group of students. Further research is needed to examine the generalizability of the findings in different educational contexts and student populations.Practical implicationsRecommendations include ongoing professional development and support systems to optimize ABL realization. Sustaining ABL practices necessitates flexible, empowering institutional structures.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by exploring the potential of ABL in the context of early childhood research education. It provides empirical evidence of the benefits of ABL for increased flexibility, learner autonomy, collaboration and technology mediation. The case study design adds to the originality by offering insights into the practical implementation of ABL in an educational setting.
Q1

Perceptions of students on artificial intelligence-generated content avatar utilization in learning management system
Tan S.F.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to explore students’ perceptions of the use of an artificial intelligence-generated content avatar (AIGC avatar) within a learning management system (LMS).Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative research involved seven postgraduate students. Data were collected through individual, in-depth interviews. The videos of the AIGC avatar, created using Leonardo, ChatGPT and Heygen, were uploaded to the LMS to communicate with students for the purposes of a welcome note, assignment guide, assignment feedback, tutorial reminders and preparation as well as to provide encouragement and study tips. Students were interviewed at the end of the semester.FindingsThe findings of this study indicated that the majority of participating students held positive perceptions regarding the use of the AIGC avatar in the LMS. They reported that it enhanced their perceived instructor’s social presence and motivation to learn. The assignment guide and feedback were particularly valued by the participants. While some students noted the AIGC avatar’s lack of naturalness, others appreciated the clear and professional speech it delivered.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was confined to seven students from a single course at one institution, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research could involve a larger and more diverse group of participants.Practical implicationsThe findings may offer education providers an alternative solution for engaging students in an LMS.Originality/valueThis study highlights the potential of AIGC avatars to replace text-based communication in LMS and enhance students’ perceived instructor social presence.
Q1

Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
Laosum T.
Q1
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to develop a model for readiness measurement and to study readiness levels for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 870 undergraduate students enrolled in the 2022 academic year of a Thai university were sampled for the study. The samples were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 432 students who underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Group 2 comprised 438 students who underwent second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both were multi-stage random samples. Descriptive statistics, item-total correlations (ITCs), coefficient correlations, EFA and second-order CFA were used.FindingsThe readiness for the online testing model comprised 5 factors and 33 indicators. These included self-efficacy (SE) in utilizing technology (nine indicators), self-directed learning (SL) for readiness testing (six indicators), adequacy of technology (AT) for testing (five indicators), acceptance of online testing (AC) (seven indicators) and readiness training for testing (six indicators). The model was congruent with empirical data, and the survey results indicated that students were highly prepared at the “high” level.Practical implicationsThis study disclosed several factors and indicators involved in the readiness for online testing. The university may use these findings in preparing its students for online testing for better achievement.Originality/valueThese findings may serve as a framework for the analysis of the readiness issues for online testing of undergraduate students and also offer guidance to the universities preparing to offer online testing.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Journal of Central South University
922 citations, 6.62%
|
|
Journal of Central South University of Technology
706 citations, 5.07%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
300 citations, 2.16%
|
|
Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
230 citations, 1.65%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
187 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
138 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Minerals Engineering
130 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Materials
113 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
109 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Hydrometallurgy
99 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
88 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Ceramics International
83 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Minerals
81 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
77 citations, 0.55%
|
|
International Journal of Geomechanics
70 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
70 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Separation and Purification Technology
68 citations, 0.49%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
65 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Advances in Civil Engineering
64 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
61 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
60 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Sustainability
59 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
59 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
58 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
58 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Environmental Earth Sciences
56 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Computers and Geotechnics
56 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Metals
54 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Powder Technology
54 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials
53 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
53 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Materials Science Forum
50 citations, 0.36%
|
|
RSC Advances
49 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Scientific Reports
49 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Minings Sciences
48 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
48 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
45 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Key Engineering Materials
45 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Engineering Geology
42 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Energies
42 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
41 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Shock and Vibration
40 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Buildings
40 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
40 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Materials Research Express
39 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Surface and Coatings Technology
39 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
38 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
37 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
37 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Ore Geology Reviews
37 citations, 0.27%
|
|
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
37 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition
36 citations, 0.26%
|
|
JOM
35 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
34 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
33 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Fuel
33 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
33 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Minerals, Metals and Materials Series
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
ACS Omega
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Processes
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IEEE Access
31 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ironmaking and Steelmaking
30 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
30 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Polymers
30 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
30 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
29 citations, 0.21%
|
|
ISIJ International
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Geofluids
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Acta Geotechnica
27 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
26 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Electrochimica Acta
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Mineral Processing
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Bioresource Technology
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Procedia Engineering
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
24 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
23 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
23 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
23 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Elsevier
3995 citations, 28.7%
|
|
Springer Nature
3660 citations, 26.29%
|
|
MDPI
802 citations, 5.76%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
581 citations, 4.17%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
559 citations, 4.02%
|
|
Wiley
500 citations, 3.59%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
423 citations, 3.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
326 citations, 2.34%
|
|
IOP Publishing
221 citations, 1.59%
|
|
SAGE
212 citations, 1.52%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
183 citations, 1.31%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
172 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
135 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
98 citations, 0.7%
|
|
AIP Publishing
73 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
67 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
55 citations, 0.4%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
50 citations, 0.36%
|
|
EDP Sciences
42 citations, 0.3%
|
|
World Scientific
37 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
35 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Emerald
34 citations, 0.24%
|
|
ASME International
32 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Thomas Telford
30 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
28 citations, 0.2%
|
|
ASM International
26 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IOS Press
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
25 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Oxford University Press
23 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
22 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
22 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nonferrous Metals Society of China
19 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 citations, 0.14%
|
|
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Chinese Society of Rare Earths
17 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japanese Geotechnical Society
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ASTM International
16 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IWA Publishing
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Science Alert
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Hans Publishers
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
King Saud University
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
14 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
13 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IGI Global
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
10 citations, 0.07%
|
|
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
9 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Higher Education Press
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Geological Society of America
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society Rheology
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science in China Press
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Concrete Institute
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scrivener Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Chemical Engineers, Japan
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Geological Society of Korea
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Alexandria University
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
JVE International Ltd.
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
GeoScienceWorld
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Rheology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Argentinean Association of Computational Mechanics
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Publishing organizations
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Central South University
1207 publications, 56.56%
|
|
Hunan University
103 publications, 4.83%
|
|
Xiangtan University
52 publications, 2.44%
|
|
South China University of Technology
43 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Central South University of Forestry and Technology
42 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
41 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
41 publications, 1.92%
|
|
Changsha University of Science and Technology
38 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
30 publications, 1.41%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
27 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Changwon National University
27 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Zhejiang University
26 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
25 publications, 1.17%
|
|
North China Electric Power University
25 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Hohai University
24 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Chongqing University
21 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
20 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Tianjin University
20 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
19 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Tongji University
17 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Northeastern University
16 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tsinghua University
15 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Hunan University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Beihang University
14 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
14 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
13 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Yanshan University
13 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Guangxi University
12 publications, 0.56%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
11 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nanjing Tech University
11 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Jiangsu University
11 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Hunan University of Technology
11 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Hunan Institute of Science and Technology
11 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Southeast University
10 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Jishou University
10 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Wuhan University
9 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Henan Polytechnic University
9 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Harbin University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Xi'an University of Technology
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shandong University
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
8 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
7 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
7 publications, 0.33%
|
|
North University of China
7 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Wuhan Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Shaoguan University
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Huaqiao University
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Inha University
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Hunan City University
6 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Sichuan University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
ETH Zurich
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Liaoning Technical University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Hunan University of Technology and Business
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Jiangxi University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Guangxi Normal University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
PLA Army Engineering University
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Tokyo
5 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Jilin University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Jinan University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Donghua University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Shanghai University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Henan University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Nagoya University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Changsha University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hunan Institute of Engineering
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Tokyo University of Technology
4 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Tehran
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Nanjing University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Wuhan University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Hebei University of Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
South-Central Minzu University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Dalian University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
3 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
China
|
China, 2053, 96.2%
China
2053 publications, 96.2%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 41, 1.92%
Republic of Korea
41 publications, 1.92%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 35, 1.64%
Japan
35 publications, 1.64%
|
USA
|
USA, 30, 1.41%
USA
30 publications, 1.41%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 16, 0.75%
Canada
16 publications, 0.75%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 14, 0.66%
United Kingdom
14 publications, 0.66%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 13, 0.61%
Australia
13 publications, 0.61%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 0.42%
Switzerland
9 publications, 0.42%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 0.33%
Germany
7 publications, 0.33%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.23%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.23%
Iran
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.23%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.19%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.19%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.14%
Russia
3 publications, 0.14%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.14%
France
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.14%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.14%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.14%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.09%
India
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.09%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.05%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.05%
Austria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.05%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.05%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.05%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.05%
Spain
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.05%
Italy
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.05%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.05%
Norway
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.05%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.05%
Poland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.05%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (1 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
3 profile journal articles
Petrovaaa Ivan
848 publications,
20 222 citations
h-index: 70
1 profile journal article
Li Xiangpeng
17 publications,
164 citations
h-index: 7