Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings)
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings)
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Université Paris-Saclay
(204 publications)

Sorbonne University
(144 publications)

Grenoble Alpes University
(97 publications)

Sorbonne University
(6 publications)

Université Paris-Saclay
(6 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2492
Q1

The Stochastic Dynamic Postdisaster Inventory Allocation Problem with Trucks and UAVs
van Steenbergen R.M., van Heeswijk W.J., Mes M.R.
Humanitarian logistics operations face increasing difficulties due to rising demands for aid in disaster areas. This paper investigates the dynamic allocation of scarce relief supplies across multiple affected districts over time. It introduces a novel stochastic dynamic postdisaster inventory allocation problem (SDPDIAP) with trucks and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) delivering relief goods under uncertain supply and demand. The relevance of this humanitarian logistics problem lies in the importance of considering the intertemporal social impact of deliveries. We achieve this by considering social costs (transportation and deprivation costs) when allocating scarce supplies. Furthermore, we consider the inherent uncertainties of disaster areas and the potential use of cargo UAVs to enhance operational efficiency. This study proposes two anticipatory solution methods based on approximate dynamic programming, specifically decomposed linear value function approximation (DL-VFA) and neural network value function approximation (NN-VFA) to effectively manage uncertainties in the dynamic allocation process. We compare DL-VFA and NN-VFA with various state-of-the-art methods (e.g., exact reoptimization and proximal policy optimization) and results show a 6%–8% improvement compared with the best benchmarks. NN-VFA provides the best performance and captures nonlinearities in the problem, whereas DL-VFA shows excellent scalability against a minor performance loss. From a practical standpoint, the experiments reveal that consideration of social costs results in improved allocation of scarce supplies both across affected districts and over time. Finally, results show that deploying UAVs can play a crucial role in the allocation of relief goods, especially in the first stages after a disaster. The use of UAVs reduces transportation and deprivation costs together by 16%–20% and reduces maximum deprivation times by 19%–40% while maintaining similar levels of demand coverage, showcasing efficient and effective operations. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023.
Q1

Solving the Real-Time Train Dispatching Problem by Column Generation
Schälicke M., Nachtigall K.
Disruptions in the operational flow of rail traffic can lead to conflicts between train movements, making it impossible to adhere to the scheduled timetable. This is when dispatching comes into play: resolving existing conflicts and providing a revised timetable. In this process, train paths are adjusted in their spatial and temporal dimensions. This adjustment is known as the train dispatching problem (TDP), which involves selecting conflict-free train paths with minimal delay. Starting from a path-oriented formulation of the TDP, a binary linear decision model is introduced. For each possible train path, a binary decision variable indicates whether the path is utilized by a train. Each train path is constructed from a set of predefined path segments within a time–space network. Instead of modeling pairwise conflicts, stronger linear programming formulations are achieved by defining cliques over the complete train paths. The combinatorial nature of the path segments results in a large number of possible paths, necessitating the use of the column-generation method. Within the subproblem, the shadow prices of conflict cliques must be considered. When constructing a new train path, it must be determined whether it belongs to a clique. This issue is addressed using a mixed integer program. The methodology is tested on instances from a dispatching area in Germany. Numerical results show that the presented method achieves acceptable computation times and good solution quality, meeting the requirements for real-time dispatching.
Q1

Estimating Erratic Measurement Errors in Network-Wide Traffic Flow via Virtual Balance Sensors
Zheng Z., Wang Z., Fu H., Ma W.
Large-scale traffic flow data are collected by numerous sensors for managing and operating transport systems. However, various measurement errors exist in the sensor data and their distributions or structures are usually not known in the real world, which diminishes the reliability of the collected data and impairs the performance of smart mobility applications. Such irregular error is referred to as the erratic measurement error and has not been well investigated in existing studies. In this research, we propose to estimate the erratic measurement errors in networked traffic flow data. Different from existing studies that mainly focus on measurement errors with known distributions or structures, we allow the distributions and structures of measurement errors to be unknown except that measurement errors occur based on a Poisson process. By exploiting the flow balance law, we first introduce the concept of virtual balance sensors and develop a mixed integer nonlinear programming model to simultaneously estimate sensor error probabilities and recover traffic flow. Under suitable assumptions, the complex integrated problem can be equivalently viewed as an estimate-then-optimize problem: first, estimation using machine learning (ML) methods, and then optimization with mathematical programming. When the assumptions fail in more realistic scenarios, we further develop a smart estimate-then-optimize (SEO) framework that embeds the optimization model into ML training loops to solve the problem. Compared with the two-stage method, the SEO framework ensures that the optimization process can recognize and compensate for inaccurate estimations caused by ML methods, which can produce more reliable results. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments using both synthetic and real-world examples under various scenarios. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our decomposition approach and the superiority of the SEO framework. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: The work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Project No. 72288101, 72101012, 72301023] and a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Grant Project No. PolyU/15206322]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0493 .
Q1

Exact Two-Step Benders Decomposition for the Time Window Assignment Traveling Salesperson Problem
Çelik Ş., Martin L., Schrotenboer A.H., Van Woensel T.
Next-day delivery logistics services are redefining the industry by increasingly focusing on customer service. Each logistics service provider’s challenge is jointly optimizing time window assignment and vehicle routing for such next-day delivery services. To do so in a cost-efficient and customer-centric fashion, real-life uncertainty, such as stochastic travel times, needs to be incorporated into the optimization process. This paper focuses on the canonical optimization problem within this context: the time window assignment traveling salesperson problem with stochastic travel times (TWATSP-ST). It belongs to two-stage, stochastic, mixed-integer programming problems with continuous recourse. We introduce two-step Benders decomposition with scenario clustering (TBDS) as an exact solution methodology for solving such stochastic programs. The method utilizes a new two-step decomposition along the binary and continuous first stage decisions and introduces a new scenario-retention strategy that combines and generalizes state-of-the-art Benders approaches and scenario-clustering techniques. Extensive experiments show that TBDS is superior to state-of-the-art approaches in the literature. It solves TWATSP-ST instances with up to 25 customers to optimality. It provides better lower and upper bounds that lead to faster convergence than existing state-of-the-art methods. We use TBDS to analyze the structure of the optimal solutions. By increasing routing costs only slightly, customer service can be improved tremendously driven by smartly alternating between high- and low-variance travel arcs to reduce the impact of delay propagation throughout the executed vehicle route. Funding: A. H. Schrotenboer has received support from the Dutch Science Foundation [Grant VI.Veni.211E.043]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0750 .
Q1

Modeling Metro Passenger Routing Choices with a Fully Differentiable End-to-End Simulation-Based Optimization (SBO) Approach
Du K., Lee E., Ma Q., Su Z., Zhang S., Lo H.K.
Metro systems in densely populated urban areas are often complicated, with some origin-destinations (OD) having multiple routes with similar travel times, leading to complex passenger routing behaviors. To improve modeling and calibration, this paper proposes a novel passenger route choice model with a metro simulator that accounts for passenger flows, queueing, congestion, and transfer delays. A novel, data-driven approach that utilizes a fully differentiable end-to-end simulation-based optimization (SBO) framework is proposed to calibrate the model, with the gradients calculated automatically and analytically using the iterative backpropagation (IB) algorithm. The SBO framework integrates data from multiple sources, including smart card data and train loadings, to calibrate the route choice parameters that best match the observed data. The full differentiability of the proposed framework enables it to calibrate for more than 20,000 passenger route choice ratios, covering every OD pair. To further improve the efficiency of the framework, a matrix-based optimization (MBO) mechanism is proposed, which provides better initial values for the SBO and ensures high efficiency with large datasets. A hybrid optimization algorithm combining MBO and SBO effectively calibrates the model, demonstrating high accuracy with synthetic data from actual passenger OD demands, where hypothesis tests are conducted for accuracies and significances. The accuracies and robustness are validated by experiments with synthetic passenger flow data, offering potential for optimizing passenger flow management in densely populated urban metro systems. Then, the SBO framework is extended for user equilibrium formulations with a crowding-aware route choice model and iterative metro simulations, calibrated by the hybrid optimization algorithm with additional matrix operations. Case studies with actual observed passenger flows are conducted to illustrate the proposed framework with multiple setups, exhibiting the heterogeneity of passenger route choice preferences and providing insights for operation management in the Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway system. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: This work was supported by the General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [Grant 16219224], the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [Grant 2023BAB076], and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72001162]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0557 .
Q1

2024 Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards
We are pleased to announce the recipients of the Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards. These awards recognize associate editors, special issue guest editors, and reviewers who have offered exceptional service in the review process. We truly appreciate all the efforts of the many volunteers who provide invaluable service to the journal. The 2024 recipients have distinguished themselves by the number of papers handled, their efficiency in handling papers, and the quality of their reviews.
Q1

Dynamic Robot Routing and Destination Assignment Policies for Robotic Sorting Systems
Fang Y., De Koster R., Roy D., Yu Y.
Robotic sorting systems (RSSs) use mobile robots to sort items by destination. An RSS pairs high accuracy and flexible capacity sorting with the advantages of a flexible layout. This is why several express parcel and e-commerce retail companies, who face heavy demand fluctuations, have implemented these systems. To cope with fluctuating demand, temporal robot congestion, and high sorting speed requirements, workload balancing strategies such as dynamic robot routing and destination reassignment may be of benefit. We investigate the effect of a dynamic robot routing policy using a Markov decision process (MDP) model and dynamic destination assignment using a mixed integer programming (MIP) model. To obtain the MDP model parameters, we first model the system as a semiopen queuing network (SOQN) that accounts for robot movement dynamics and network congestion. Then, we construct the MIP model to find a destination reassignment scheme that minimizes the workload imbalance. With inputs from the SOQN and MIP models, the Markov decision process minimizes parcel waiting and postponement costs and helps to find a good heuristic robot routing policy to reduce congestion. We show that the heuristic dynamic routing policy is near optimal in small-scale systems and outperforms benchmark policies in large-scale realistic scenarios. Dynamic destination reassignment also has positive effects on the throughput capacity in highly loaded systems. Together, in our case company, they improve the throughput capacity by 35%. Simultaneously, the effect of dynamic routing exceeds that of dynamic destination reassignment, suggesting that managers should focus more on dynamic robot routing than dynamic destination reassignment to mitigate temporal congestion. Funding: This work was supported by The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant WK2040000094] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71921001 and 72091215/72091210]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0458 .
Q1

Multimodal Transportation Pricing Alliance Design: Large-Scale Optimization for Rapid Gains
Cummings K., Vaze V., Ergun Ö., Barnhart C.
Transit agencies have the opportunity to outsource certain services to established mobility-on-demand (MOD) providers. Such alliances can improve service quality, coverage, and ridership; reduce public sector costs and vehicular emissions; and integrate the passenger experience. To amplify the effectiveness of such alliances, we develop a fare-setting model that jointly optimizes fares and discounts across a multimodal network. We capture commuters’ travel decisions with a discrete choice model, resulting in a large-scale, mixed-integer, nonconvex optimization problem. To solve this challenging problem, we develop a two-stage decomposition with the pricing decisions in the first stage and a mixed-integer linear optimization of fare discounts and passengers’ travel decisions in the second stage. To solve the decomposition, we develop a new solution approach that combines customized coordinate descent, parsimonious second-stage evaluations, and interpolations using special ordered sets. This approach, enhanced by acceleration techniques based on slanted traversal, randomization, and warm-start, significantly outperforms algorithmic benchmarks. Different alliance priorities result in qualitatively different fare designs: flat fares decrease the total vehicle-miles traveled, whereas geographically informed discounts improve passenger happiness. The model responds appropriately to equity-oriented and passenger-centric priorities, improving system utilization and lowering prices for low-income and long-distance commuters. Our profit allocation mechanism improves the outcomes for both types of operators, thus incentivizing profit-oriented MOD operators to adopt transit priorities. Funding: This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants 1122374 and 1750587]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0009 .
Q1

Designing the Liner Shipping Network of Tomorrow Powered by Alternative Fuels
Johansen M.L., Holst K.K., Ropke S.
The liner shipping industry is undergoing an extensive decarbonization process to reduce its 275 million tons of CO2 emissions as of 2018. In this process, the long-term solution is the introduction of new alternative maritime fuels. The introduction of alternative fuels presents a great set of unknowns. Among these are the strategic concerns regarding sourcing of alternative fuels and, operationally, how the new fuels might affect the network of shipping routes. We propose a problem formulation that integrates fuel supply/demand into the liner shipping network design problem. Here, we present a model to determine the production sites and distribution of new alternative fuels—we consider methanol and ammonia. For the network design problem, we apply an adaptive large neighborhood search combined with a delayed column generation process. In addition, we wish to test the effect of designing a robust network under uncertain demand conditions because of the problem’s strategic nature and importance. Therefore, our proposed solution method will have a deterministic and stochastic setup when we apply it to the second-largest multihub instance, WorldSmall, known from LINER-LIB. In the deterministic setting, our proposed solution method finds a new best solution to three instances from LINER-LIB. For the main considered WorldSmall instance, we even noticed a new best solution in all our tested fuel settings. In addition, we note a profit drop of 7.2% between a bunker-powered and pure alternative fuel–powered network. The selected alternative fuel production sites favor a proximity to European ports and have a heavy reliance on wind turbines. The stochastic results clearly showed that the found networks were much more resilient to the demand changes. Neglecting the perspective of uncertain demand leads to highly fluctuating profits. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0143 .
Q1

A Two-Stage Iteration Method for Solving the Departure Time Choice Problem
Guo R., Yang H., Huang H.
We discuss the numerical solution of the departure time choice problem. The non–quasi-monotone of the travel cost vector function is first proved to address the study motivation. A two-stage iteration method is then proposed to effectively solve the problem in a single origin-destination (OD) pair network with parallel links, in which departure time and route choices of commuters are involved. We analytically reveal why the iteration method can solve the problem and theoretically prove the convergence, that is, the iteration process finally achieves at a user equilibrium (UE) state. The iteration method is then extended to a single link network with heterogeneous users in the values of travel time and schedule delay and the preferred arrival time. Furthermore, numerical analyses are conducted for the two networks to demonstrate the effectiveness of the iteration method for solving the departure time choice problem. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72288101, 72171007, and 72021001]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0599 .
Q1

The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem with Ghost Kitchens
Neria G., Hildebrandt F.D., Tzur M., Ulmer M.W.
Restaurant meal delivery has been rapidly growing in the last few years. The main operational challenges are the temporally and spatially dispersed stochastic demand that arrives from customers all over town as well as the customers’ expectation of timely and fresh delivery. To overcome these challenges, a new business concept emerged: ghost kitchens. This concept proposes synchronized food preparation of several restaurants in a central facility. Ghost kitchens can bring several advantages, such as fresher food because of the synchronization of food preparation and delivery and less delay because of the consolidated delivery of orders. Exploiting these advantages requires effective operational strategies for the dynamic scheduling of food preparation and delivery. The goal of this paper is providing these strategies and investigating the value of ghost kitchens. We model the problem as a sequential decision process. For the complex decision space of scheduling order preparations, consolidating orders to trips, and scheduling trip departures, we propose a large neighborhood search (LNS) procedure based on partial decisions and driven by analytical properties. Within the LNS, decisions are evaluated via a value function approximation, enabling anticipatory and real-time decision making. In a comprehensive computational study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method compared with benchmark policies and highlight the advantages of ghost kitchens compared with conventional meal delivery. Funding: G. Neria’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center, the Council for Higher Education in Israel, and the Shlomo Shmeltzer Institute for Smart Transportation at Tel Aviv University. F. D. Hildebrandt’s research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) German Research Foundation [Grant 413322447]. M. Tzur’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center. M. W. Ulmer’s work is funded by the DFG Emmy Noether Programme [Grant 444657906]. We gratefully acknowledge their support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0510 .
Q1

Multiday User Equilibrium with Strategic Commuters
Wu M., Yin Y., Lynch J.P.
In the era of connected and automated mobility, commuters possess strong computation power, enabling them to strategically make sequential travel choices over a planning horizon. This paper investigates the multiday traffic patterns that arise from such decision-making behavior. In doing so, we frame the commute problem as a mean-field Markov game and introduce a novel concept of multiday user equilibrium to capture the steady state of commuters’ interactions. The proposed model is general and can be tailored to various travel choices, such as route or departure time. We explore a range of properties of the multiday user equilibrium under mild conditions. The study reveals the fingerprint of user inertia on network flow patterns, causing between-day variations even at a steady state. Furthermore, our analysis establishes critical connections between the multiday user equilibrium and conventional Wardrop equilibrium. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI-1854684, CMMI-1904575, CMMI-2233057, and CMMI-2240981]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0488 .
Q1

On the Concept of Opportunity Cost in Integrated Demand Management and Vehicle Routing
Fleckenstein D., Klein R., Klein V., Steinhardt C.
Integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems are characterized by a stream of customers arriving dynamically over a booking horizon and requesting logistical services, fulfilled by a given fleet of vehicles during a service horizon. Prominent examples are attended home delivery and same-day delivery problems, where customers commonly have heterogeneous preferences regarding service fulfillment and requests differ in profitability. Thus, demand management methods are applied to steer the booking process to maximize total profit considering the cost of the routing decisions for the resulting orders. To measure the requests’ profitability for any demand management method, it is common to estimate their opportunity cost. In the context of integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems, this estimation differs substantially from the estimation in the well-examined demand management problems of traditional revenue management applications as, for example, found in the airline or car rental industry. This is because of the unique interrelation of demand control decisions and vehicle routing decisions as it inhibits a clear quantification and attribution of cost, and of displaced revenue, to certain customer requests. In this paper, we extend the theoretical foundation of opportunity cost in integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems. By defining and analyzing a generic Markov decision process model, we formally derive a definition of opportunity cost and prove opportunity cost properties on a general level. Hence, our findings are valid for a wide range of specific problems. Further, based on these theoretical findings, we propose approximation approaches that have not yet been applied in the existing literature, and evaluate their potential in a computational study. Thereby, we provide evidence that the theoretical results can be practically exploited in the development of solution algorithms. Funding: This work was supported by the University of the Bundeswehr Munich. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0644 .
Q1

A 0,1 Linear Programming Approach to Deadlock Detection and Management in Railways
Dal Sasso V., Lamorgese L., Mannino C., Onofri A., Ventura P.
In railway systems, a deadlock occurs when trains accidentally occupy positions that prevent each other from moving forward. Although deadlocks are rare events, they do occur from time to time, requiring costly recourse actions and generating significant knock-on delays. In this paper, we present a noncompact 0,1 linear programming formulation and a methodology for discovering (possibly future) deadlocks and the subsequent implementation of optimal recovery measures. The approach is implemented in a tool to dispatch trains in real time developed in cooperation with Union Pacific (UP) and currently in operations on the entire UP network. Funding: This work was partially funded by Europe’s Rail, Flagship Project MOTIONAL [Action Horizon JU Innovation, Project 101101973]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0521 .
Q1

Pricing and Demand Management for Integrated Same-Day and Next-Day Delivery Systems
Banerjee D., Erera A.L., Toriello A.
We study a system in which a common delivery fleet provides service to both same-day delivery (SDD) and next-day delivery (NDD) orders placed by e-retail customers who are sensitive to delivery prices. We develop a model of the system and optimize with respect to two separate objectives. First, empirical research suggests that fulfilling e-retail orders ahead of promised delivery days increases a firm’s long-run market share. Motivated by this phenomenon, we optimize for customer satisfaction by maximizing the quantity of NDD orders fulfilled one day early given fixed prices. Next, we optimize for total profit; we optimize for a single SDD price, and we then set SDD prices in a two-level scheme with discounts for early-ordering customers. Our analysis relies on continuous approximation techniques to capture the interplay between NDD and SDD orders and particularly the effect one day’s operations have on the next, a novel modeling component not present in SDD-only models; a key technical result is establishing the model’s convergence to a steady state using dynamical systems theory. We derive structural insights and efficient algorithms for both objectives. In particular, we show that, under certain conditions, the total profit is a piecewise-convex function with polynomially many breakpoints that can be efficiently enumerated. In a case study set in metropolitan Denver, Colorado, approximately 10% of NDD orders can be fulfilled one day early at optimality, and profit is increased by 1% to 3% in a two-level pricing scheme versus a one-level scheme. We conduct operational simulations for validation of solutions and analysis of initial conditions. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant DGE-1650044]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0381 .
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Physical Review B
656 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
619 citations, 2.53%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
600 citations, 2.46%
|
|
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
294 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
264 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Physics of Plasmas
263 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
235 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
226 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Acta Materialia
222 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
214 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
203 citations, 0.83%
|
|
International Journal of Impact Engineering
201 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
193 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Review of Scientific Instruments
185 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Physical Review A
185 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Thin Solid Films
181 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Materials Science Forum
175 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Materials
170 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Surface and Coatings Technology
168 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Journal Physics D: Applied Physics
148 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
147 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
146 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Physical Review E
138 citations, 0.57%
|
|
International Journal of Solids and Structures
137 citations, 0.56%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
133 citations, 0.54%
|
|
International Journal of Plasticity
129 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Scripta Materialia
128 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Metals
125 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Nuclear Materials
122 citations, 0.5%
|
|
European Physical Journal: Special Topics
119 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Physica B: Condensed Matter
117 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Materials Transactions
109 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Acta Physica Polonica A
105 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science
103 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
101 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
96 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
96 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
95 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Key Engineering Materials
94 citations, 0.38%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
91 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
91 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Solid State Phenomena
81 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
78 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
78 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
77 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Corrosion Science
74 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
74 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Crystal Growth
73 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME
73 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
72 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
72 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Mechanics of Materials
70 citations, 0.29%
|
|
MRS Proceedings
70 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
69 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
68 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
64 citations, 0.26%
|
|
New Journal of Physics
63 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
62 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
61 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
60 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Europhysics Letters
59 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
59 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Ferroelectrics
59 citations, 0.24%
|
|
EPJ Applied Physics
57 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Crystals
56 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
55 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
55 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
55 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Springer Series in Materials Science
54 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Intermetallics
53 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
53 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Surface Science
52 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Progress in Materials Science
52 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Experimental Mechanics
51 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
51 citations, 0.21%
|
|
EPJ Web of Conferences
51 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films
50 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
50 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Physics of Metals and Metallography
49 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Materials Characterization
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Materials Research Express
47 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Solar Energy
47 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials
47 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Ceramics International
46 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Structural Chemistry
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Applied Geochemistry
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Shape Memory and Superelasticity
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physica Scripta
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Solid State Communications
44 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
44 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
43 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Scientific Reports
43 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Materials Letters
42 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Materials & Design (1980-2015)
41 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Elsevier
7603 citations, 31.13%
|
|
Springer Nature
2355 citations, 9.64%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1815 citations, 7.43%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1649 citations, 6.75%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1329 citations, 5.44%
|
|
Wiley
1020 citations, 4.18%
|
|
MDPI
768 citations, 3.14%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
720 citations, 2.95%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
676 citations, 2.77%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
556 citations, 2.28%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
530 citations, 2.17%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
366 citations, 1.5%
|
|
ASME International
234 citations, 0.96%
|
|
EDP Sciences
170 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Copernicus
168 citations, 0.69%
|
|
SAGE
157 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
153 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
127 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
109 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
107 citations, 0.44%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
106 citations, 0.43%
|
|
102 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
77 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
77 citations, 0.32%
|
|
64 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
64 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
63 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Oxford University Press
49 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Emerald
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
48 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
44 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
40 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
39 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Scientific
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Royal Society
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
38 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SAE International
30 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
29 citations, 0.12%
|
|
OpenEdition
29 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
27 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
26 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
24 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Annual Reviews
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
21 citations, 0.09%
|
|
21 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
19 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Laser Institute of America
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
17 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
17 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IGI Global
16 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
ASTM International
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
14 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Stichting SciPost
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society of Rheology
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear Fusion Research (JSPF)
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Laser Society of Japan
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IntechOpen
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Japan Society for Technology and Plasticity
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Bryological & Lichenological Society
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems of RAS
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Society of Materials Science, Japan
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Surface Science Society of Japan
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Allerton Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Magnetics Society of Japan
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
FSUE CRISM Prometey
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Begell House
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
204 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Sorbonne University
144 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
97 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Tokyo
80 publications, 0.71%
|
|
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
75 publications, 0.66%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
70 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
67 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Tohoku University
67 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
64 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Paris Cité University
57 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
57 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
56 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
54 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Osaka University
54 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Montpellier
52 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
51 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
50 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Kyoto University
48 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Université d'Orléans
46 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
45 publications, 0.4%
|
|
École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielles de la Ville de Paris
45 publications, 0.4%
|
|
CentraleSupélec
45 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
44 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
43 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hokkaido University
42 publications, 0.37%
|
|
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris
39 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Oxford
38 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
38 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Institut Laue-Langevin
38 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
37 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
36 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Université de Lille
36 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Centrale Lyon
32 publications, 0.28%
|
|
United States Naval Research Laboratory
30 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
27 publications, 0.24%
|
|
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
27 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Washington
27 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Institute for Molecular Science
27 publications, 0.24%
|
|
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
26 publications, 0.23%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
26 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Cambridge
26 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
26 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
26 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
ETH Zurich
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Antwerp
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Silesian University of Technology
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
25 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
24 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
24 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Barcelona
24 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Observatoire de Paris
24 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse
24 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
23 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
23 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
23 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Centro Atómico Bariloche
23 publications, 0.2%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Aalto University
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Koszalin University of Technology
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of New Mexico
22 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
21 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Hiroshima University
21 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Okayama University
21 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Military University of Technology
21 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
20 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Paul Scherrer Institute
20 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Göttingen
20 publications, 0.18%
|
|
All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
École normale supérieure Paris-Saclay
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Toronto
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional
19 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Nanjing University
18 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Institute of Materials Science of Barcelona
18 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Zagreb
18 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Uppsala University
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Manchester
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Sandia National Laboratories
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Silesia in Katowice
17 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
16 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Milan
16 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Southern California
16 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
16 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
Sorbonne University
6 publications, 3%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
6 publications, 3%
|
|
![]() Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 2.5%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 2%
|
|
University of Zagreb
4 publications, 2%
|
|
Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Cologne
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Institut Laue-Langevin
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Okayama University
3 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
2 publications, 1%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Nantes
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Paris Cité University
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Leiden University
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Groningen
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Institute for Molecular Science
2 publications, 1%
|
|
Poznań University of Technology
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Kentucky
2 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Montpellier
2 publications, 1%
|
|
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Tsinghua University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielles de la Ville de Paris
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Chalmers University of Technology
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Lulea University of Technology
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Paul Scherrer Institute
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Fribourg
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Imperial College London
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Auburn University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Washington
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Kyoto University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Tohoku University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Széchenyi István University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bristol
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of St Andrews
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Kobe University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Technical University of Braunschweig
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Saarland University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Paderborn University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Hokkaido University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Augsburg
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Bremen
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Graz
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Kumamoto University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Gakushuin University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Maribor
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Texas A&M University
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Tennessee
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
University of Split
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Universidade Federal Fluminense
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Centrale Lyon
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Université d'Orléans
1 publication, 0.5%
|
|
Show all (61 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
France
|
France, 3211, 28.44%
France
3211 publications, 28.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 869, 7.7%
Germany
869 publications, 7.7%
|
USA
|
USA, 843, 7.47%
USA
843 publications, 7.47%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 705, 6.25%
Japan
705 publications, 6.25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 643, 5.7%
Russia
643 publications, 5.7%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 416, 3.69%
United Kingdom
416 publications, 3.69%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 361, 3.2%
Italy
361 publications, 3.2%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 263, 2.33%
Spain
263 publications, 2.33%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 262, 2.32%
Poland
262 publications, 2.32%
|
China
|
China, 196, 1.74%
China
196 publications, 1.74%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 169, 1.5%
Switzerland
169 publications, 1.5%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 165, 1.46%
Netherlands
165 publications, 1.46%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 154, 1.36%
Canada
154 publications, 1.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 153, 1.36%
Belgium
153 publications, 1.36%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 121, 1.07%
Ukraine
121 publications, 1.07%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 106, 0.94%
Sweden
106 publications, 0.94%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 99, 0.88%
Czech Republic
99 publications, 0.88%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 98, 0.87%
Brazil
98 publications, 0.87%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 89, 0.79%
Romania
89 publications, 0.79%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 78, 0.69%
Republic of Korea
78 publications, 0.69%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 76, 0.67%
USSR
76 publications, 0.67%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 75, 0.66%
Austria
75 publications, 0.66%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 60, 0.53%
Israel
60 publications, 0.53%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 58, 0.51%
Australia
58 publications, 0.51%
|
India
|
India, 58, 0.51%
India
58 publications, 0.51%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 53, 0.47%
Morocco
53 publications, 0.47%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 51, 0.45%
Argentina
51 publications, 0.45%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 50, 0.44%
Hungary
50 publications, 0.44%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 49, 0.43%
Algeria
49 publications, 0.43%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 43, 0.38%
Mexico
43 publications, 0.38%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 43, 0.38%
Finland
43 publications, 0.38%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 42, 0.37%
Croatia
42 publications, 0.37%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 40, 0.35%
Denmark
40 publications, 0.35%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 38, 0.34%
Greece
38 publications, 0.34%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 35, 0.31%
Slovakia
35 publications, 0.31%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 29, 0.26%
Bulgaria
29 publications, 0.26%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 29, 0.26%
Slovenia
29 publications, 0.26%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 28, 0.25%
Portugal
28 publications, 0.25%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 25, 0.22%
Belarus
25 publications, 0.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 25, 0.22%
Norway
25 publications, 0.22%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 15, 0.13%
Serbia
15 publications, 0.13%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 15, 0.13%
Tunisia
15 publications, 0.13%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 13, 0.12%
Ireland
13 publications, 0.12%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 13, 0.12%
Lebanon
13 publications, 0.12%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 13, 0.12%
Lithuania
13 publications, 0.12%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 13, 0.12%
Yugoslavia
13 publications, 0.12%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 11, 0.1%
Latvia
11 publications, 0.1%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 0.1%
Turkey
11 publications, 0.1%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 9, 0.08%
South Africa
9 publications, 0.08%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 7, 0.06%
Moldova
7 publications, 0.06%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.06%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.06%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 7, 0.06%
Montenegro
7 publications, 0.06%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 6, 0.05%
Kazakhstan
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 6, 0.05%
Estonia
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 6, 0.05%
Venezuela
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.05%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 5, 0.04%
Cuba
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.04%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 5, 0.04%
Czechoslovakia
5 publications, 0.04%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.04%
Chile
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 3, 0.03%
Armenia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 3, 0.03%
Georgia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.03%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 3, 0.03%
Uzbekistan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 0.02%
Azerbaijan
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 2, 0.02%
Bolivia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.02%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.02%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.02%
Iran
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.02%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.02%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.02%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.02%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.02%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.02%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.02%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.02%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.01%
Albania
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.01%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.01%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.01%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.01%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.01%
Libya
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 1, 0.01%
Madagascar
1 publication, 0.01%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.01%
UAE
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.01%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Turkmenistan
|
Turkmenistan, 1, 0.01%
Turkmenistan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (57 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
France
|
France, 48, 24%
France
48 publications, 24%
|
USA
|
USA, 28, 14%
USA
28 publications, 14%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 25, 12.5%
Germany
25 publications, 12.5%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 6.5%
Japan
13 publications, 6.5%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 11, 5.5%
Croatia
11 publications, 5.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 10, 5%
Russia
10 publications, 5%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 3%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 3%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 2.5%
Switzerland
5 publications, 2.5%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 2%
Netherlands
4 publications, 2%
|
China
|
China, 3, 1.5%
China
3 publications, 1.5%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 1.5%
Hungary
3 publications, 1.5%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.5%
Canada
3 publications, 1.5%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 1.5%
Poland
3 publications, 1.5%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1%
Austria
2 publications, 1%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 1%
Slovenia
2 publications, 1%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 1%
Philippines
2 publications, 1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 1%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 1%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 1%
Sweden
2 publications, 1%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.5%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.5%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.5%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.5%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.5%
India
1 publication, 0.5%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.5%
Italy
1 publication, 0.5%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.5%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.5%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
5 profile journal articles
Romanenko Galina
DSc in Chemistry

International Tomography Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
386 publications,
3 913 citations
h-index: 30
Research interests
Crystal Chemistry
4 profile journal articles
Yakimov E

National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
351 publications,
3 176 citations
h-index: 28
4 profile journal articles
Kuzmin Alexei
282 publications,
5 526 citations
h-index: 38
3 profile journal articles
Soldatov Alexander

Southern Federal University
587 publications,
10 150 citations
h-index: 51
3 profile journal articles
Razorenov Sergey

Federal Research Center of Problem of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry RAS
182 publications,
2 681 citations
h-index: 26
3 profile journal articles
COUDERC Vincent
386 publications,
4 787 citations
h-index: 33
3 profile journal articles
Drozdov Andrey

Perm National Research Polytechnic University
90 publications,
1 405 citations
h-index: 21
2 profile journal articles
Vyalikh Denis

Donostia International Physics Center
276 publications,
8 700 citations
h-index: 49
2 profile journal articles
Newville M
125 publications,
21 771 citations
h-index: 36
2 profile journal articles
Eric Xu H
PhD

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
702 publications,
19 346 citations
h-index: 68
2 profile journal articles
Fokin Sergey

International Tomography Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
81 publications,
1 187 citations
h-index: 17
2 profile journal articles
Brun Christophe

Sorbonne University
61 publications,
1 948 citations
h-index: 24