Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
2.4
SJR
0.598
CiteScore
5.4
Categories
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Mechanical Engineering
Areas
Engineering
Materials Science
Years of issue
1990-2025
journal names
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
J INTEL MAT SYST STR
Top-3 citing journals

Smart Materials and Structures
(10039 citations)

Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
(9671 citations)

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
(1918 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Virginia Tech
(214 publications)

University of Maryland, College Park
(134 publications)

Pennsylvania State University
(104 publications)

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
(34 publications)

Harbin Institute of Technology
(21 publications)

Zhejiang University
(17 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1369
Q1

Cosimulation-based biomechanics of the human body with hip prosthesis
Di Bona R., Catelani D., Ottaviano E., Gentile D., Testa G.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Correction to: A new skeletal model for the ankle joint complex
Rodrigues da Silva M., Marques F., Tavares da Silva M., Flores P.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A symplectic finite element method in time for periodic response of multibody systems
Wang H., Wang C., Wang G., Pan Y., Mikkola A., Peng H.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Investigation of the dynamic transmission accuracy of an industrial robot joint RV reducer under variable situations
Xu L., Wu Y.
The dynamic transmission error of the joint RV (rotating vector) reducer is one of the important factors affecting the positioning accuracy of industrial robots. However, the current studies on the transmission accuracy characteristics of RV reducers are based on the equal speed driving condition, which neglects the impact of the transmission error generated by the joint RV reducer on the positioning accuracy when the robot is in the start-stop variable speed phase. This study carries out an in-depth analysis of the dynamic transmission accuracy characteristics of joint RV reducers of industrial robots under variable-speed working conditions. Two typical mathematical models of variable-speed drive laws are constructed, and a multibody dynamic model of the RV reducer that takes into account the geometric errors of typical components is established, aiming to more accurately simulate the operating state of the RV reducer under actual working conditions. To confirm the accuracy of the theoretical RV reducer contact dynamics model, the dynamic transmission error test of the RV reducer under equal-speed conditions is carried out. The results show that the dynamic model can better reflect the actual transmission characteristics of the RV reducer. Thereafter, based on the theoretical model, the effects of different driving laws on the dynamic transmission error of joint RV reducers are analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that the transmission error of the RV reducer under variable speed drive is significantly larger than that under equal speed drive. Moreover, angular acceleration and load inertia are the main factors affecting the transmission error of RV reducers for industrial robot joints.
Q1

Muscle path predictions using a discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange model in constrained optimisation: comparison with OpenSim and experimental data
Lavaill M., Chen X., Heinrich S., Pivonka P., Leyendecker S.
Abstract
Accurate and robust modelling of muscle paths is crucial for predicting human movement. Traditional methods often rely on simplified straight-line representations and manual specifications of via-points and wrapping surfaces, which may lead to inconsistent and unrealistic muscle paths The discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange (DGEL) method identifies geodesics with minimal curvature trajectories that adhere closely to anatomical constraints. Embedding DGEL into an optimisation problem with a specific objective function has the potential to identify muscle paths with smooth changes in muscle length over the course of the motion, thereby avoiding abrupt muscle discontinuities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the DGEL method. We developed multibody models with increasing complexity (i.e. a static arm model, a kinematic elbow model and a kinematic shoulder model) and investigated different scenarios, such as muscle attachment modifications, simulation of diverse motions and extreme ranges of motion. We performed a comparative analysis between the geodesic model and the open-source OpenSim framework, with validation against experimental data to assess physiological plausibility. Our findings reveal that the DGEL method overcomes limitations inherent in traditional approaches, including discontinuities and incorrect wrapping surface interactions. For the static arm model, the DGEL-computed muscle length showed a closer match to ground truth compared to OpenSim. In the elbow model, the DGEL method eliminated unphysiological muscle path discontinuities. In the shoulder model, the DGEL method was validated across three different motions against experimental muscle moment arms, achieving great accuracy and superior robustness in handling complex muscle paths. This method effectively addressed common pitfalls in muscle path modelling, such as bone penetrations and erratic trajectories. Future work will further validate the DGEL method across diverse real-world applications and optimise its performance through advanced objective functions. The DGEL approach represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and robustness of muscle path modelling, advancing the field of biomechanics and musculoskeletal modelling.
Q1

Dynamic responses of a vibro-impact capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine via multibody dynamics
Wang Z., Tian J., Liu Y., Neves A., Prasad S.
Abstract
In recent years, colonic capsule endoscopy has become available in clinical practice as an alternative modality to colonoscopy. However, it faces challenges such as prolonged examination time and the absence of clinician navigation. Leveraging their pioneering work in the field of vibro-impact self-propulsion technique for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Zhang et al. (IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8:1842–1849, 2023) developed a novel, untethered, self-propelled, endoscopic capsule robot, with the aim of providing a new means of examining bowel cancer in real time. To evaluate and optimize the passage of this capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine, this work adopts multibody dynamics analysis and experimental investigation to study the robot’s dynamics and its interaction with the intestinal environment. Considering the complex anatomy of the large intestine, containing different sections, e.g., cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and variations of the haustra, e.g., with various radii, lengths, and heights, the robot was driven by the square-wave excitation of an inner mass interacting with the capsule body and tested on a real porcine colon. The robot’s driving parameters, including the excitation frequency, amplitude, and duty cycle, and the dimensions of the haustra are the two main factors influencing the robot’s progression in the intestine. By comparing with the experimental results, the proposed multibody dynamics model developed using MSC Adams can estimate the movement of the capsule robot and the intestinal resistance quantitatively. Extensive numerical and experimental studies suggest an excitation frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 0.4 as the optimal parameters for driving the robot, and the longer the haustral length is, the faster the robot passes through. These results ensure the validity of the proposed multibody dynamics platform, which can be used by robotic engineers for developing medical robots for intestinal examinations.
Q1

Fluid-conveying pipes in the floating frame of reference formulation
van Voorthuizen K., Abdul Rasheed M.I., Schilder J.
Abstract
This work presents a new formulation for flexible fluid-conveying pipe elements based on the widely used floating frame of reference formulation. The elements can be used as a tool for the analysis of flexible multibody systems that contain fluid-conveying pipes, as it is well known that the movement of the fluid can influence the behavior and stability of such systems. The pipe defines a control volume through which the fluid, which is considered to be a moving mass, axially flows. The velocity of a material point of the fluid is therefore a material derivative of its position, representing the large rigid movement and small elastic deformation of the pipe along with the velocity of the fluid with respect to the pipe. The equations of motion are derived through the principle of virtual work, spatial discretization by finite element interpolation functions, and model reduction. A simplification of the consistent equations of motion is proposed, which avoids the use of inertia shape integrals and reduces the effort required to implement the developed fluid-conveying pipe elements in existing multibody software. The developed elements are validated by simulation of a straight cantilevered pipe and a curved pipe constrained on one end by a hinge. A simulation of a concrete printing system illustrates the straightforward incorporation of the elements in larger multibody systems.
Q1

Dynamic modeling and simulation of the multi-point collision and contact problem of multi-legged robots
Ma X., Zhao S., An Y., Li K., Wang T.
The problem of multi-point collision and contact in multi-legged robots involves complex dynamics with multiple closed loops, variable topology, and numerous contact points, making simulations challenging. Additionally, Zeno behavior—characterized by an infinite number of discrete transitions within a finite time—is likely to occur, reducing computational efficiency and potentially causing simulations to stall. This paper establishes a linear complementary dynamic model to study the collision and contact problem of multi-legged mobile robots. For the uncertainty of multi-point collision and contact, we use sets and transformation matrices to represent the number and position changes of the points that collide or contact with the ground. This paper separately studies the problems of multi-point collision and multi-point continuous contact and considers the coupling effect of collision and continuous contact. A new criterion to determine the state of continuous contact is proposed, and modifications are made to the relevant linear complementary equations to prevent the Zeno behavior. Finally, several numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Q1

Vibration isolation performance and non-probabilistic reliability evaluation of multidimensional vibration isolator with interval joint clearance
Gao X., Niu J., He L., Wang Z., Qin Z., Wu H.
For suppressing multidimensional vibration effectively, the multidimensional vibration isolator based on parallel mechanism considering interval joint clearance is proposed. The kinematics and dynamics of the isolator are established respectively. The contact force generated due to interval joint clearance is modeled respectively by the Lankarani–Nikravesh (L-N) model and the modified Coulomb friction force model. Furthermore, the dynamics of the isolator with interval joint clearance are obtained by the first order interval perturbation method. The upper and lower bounds of vibration isolation performance are calculated, which indicates the isolator with interval joint clearance inhibited external vibration in time and frequency domain respectively. The vibration isolation performance is most sensitive in pitch (around $x$ ) direction due to the existence of interval joint clearance. The non-probabilistic reliability model of the isolator is proposed by the shortest distance method, and the non-probabilistic reliability index is investigated in each isolation direction with interval joint clearance. The reliability index of the isolator exhibits a quasi-stable area in horizontal (in $x$ ) and pitch (around $x$ ) directions, which implies the reliability index is not sensitive to joint clearance variation in a certain perturbation range. The proposed vibration isolator with interval joint clearance is fabricated, and the vibration isolation experiment is conducted. The experimental results are generally consistent with the theoretical results, which indicates the correctness of the analysis.
Q1

Using high fidelity discrete element simulation to calibrate an expeditious terramechanics model in a multibody dynamics framework
Zhang Y., Dai J., Hu W., Negrut D.
The wheel–soil interaction has great impact on the dynamics of off-road vehicles in terramechanics applications. The soil contact model (SCM), which anchors an empirical method to characterize the frictional contact between a wheel and soil, has been widely used in off-road vehicle dynamics simulations because it quickly produces adequate results for many terramechanics applications. The SCM approach calls for a set of model parameters that are obtained via a bevameter test. This test is expensive and time consuming to carry out, and in some cases difficult to set up, e.g., in extraterrestrial applications. We propose an approach to address these concerns by conducting the bevameter test in simulation, using a model that captures the physics of the actual experiment with high fidelity. To that end, we model the bevameter test rig as a multibody system, while the dynamics of the soil is captured using a discrete element model (DEM). The multibody dynamics–soil dynamics co-simulation is used to replicate the bevameter test, producing high fidelity ground truth test data that is subsequently used to calibrate the SCM parameters within a Bayesian inference framework. To test the accuracy of the resulting SCM terramechanics, we run single wheel and full rover simulations using both DEM and SCM terrains. The SCM results match well with those produced by the DEM solution, and the simulation time for SCM is two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of DEM. All simulations in this work are performed using Chrono, an open-source, publicly available simulator. The scripts and models used are available in a public repository for reproducibility studies and further research.
Q1

A machine learning approach to simulate flexible body dynamics
Slimak T., Zwölfer A., Todorov B., Rixen D.
Abstract
Flexible body dynamics simulations are powerful tools to realistically analyze vehicles, machines, mechanics, etc. However, the inherently nonlinear governing equations often require tailor-made and computationally expense solution strategies. Employing artificial neural networks for forward dynamics analyses of flexible bodies may be not only useful as a model reduction tool, since evaluating a network is frequently faster compared to solving physics-based models, but also to enhance models with experimental data. In this realm four primary strategies have emerged: (i) Incorporating time as an input to the artificial neural network to predict the desired solution variables at that specific time. (ii) Utilizing an entire time series as input, the network generates the corresponding time series of the desired solution variables in a single pass through the artificial neural network. (iii) Employing an artificial neural network to advance one time step into the future using the states as input. (iv) Leveraging the artificial neural network solely for learning the equations of motion or energetic quantities, e.g., Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, coupled with standard techniques from analytical dynamics and time integration. Approaches (iii) and (iv) can be considered advantageous owing to their inherent physics-informed nature, greater flexibility in adopting varying time steps, and ease of integration with classical simulation techniques. This contribution, therefore, presents a method to predict flexible body dynamics one step at a time using two complimentary artificial neural networks. One network predicts the equations of motion relationship between positions, velocities, and accelerations, while a second network or numerical integrator propagates the system states forwards in time. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the developed approach on the testcase of a flexible beam. Various parameter studies and alternative solutions are presented to highlight the performance of the developed approach. The robustness and ability to extrapolate are also explored to determine the practical viability of this solution. The intention of this single-body work is to enable the future embedding in a multibody context.
Q1

Embedding reference dynamics in model predictive control for trajectory tracking of multi-input multi-output non-minimum phase underactuated multibody systems
Bettega J., Richiedei D., Tamellin I.
This paper proposes a feedback control technique for path and trajectory tracking on multi-input, multi-output nonminimum phase underactuated multibody systems and applies it to a spatial gantry crane moving a double pendulum. The two links forming the double pendulum are connected in series and the desired output of the system is the tip of the second link. This output selection yields to a nonminimum phase system, which is a class of dynamical systems that are particularly challenging from the control design perspective. In this paper, an enhanced formulation of Model Predictive Control is proposed to solve the output trajectory tracking problem by embedding the dynamics of the spatial reference trajectory within the optimization process performed at each time step. The proposed control technique is formulated considering two different scenarios: the case of torque-controlled (i.e., current-controlled) actuators, and the case of position-controlled actuators. The latter is unusual in the field of MPC and is suitable for industrial applications where proprietary controllers are adopted. Numerical validations show negligible contour and tracking errors during the execution of the desired trajectories, with low computational effort.
Q1

Optimising a driving mechanism mechanical design of EXOTIC exoskeleton—a review on upper limb exoskeletons driving systems and a case study
Falkowski P., Mohammadi M., Andreasen Struijk L.N., Rzymkowski C., Pilat Z.
AbstractWhile designing rehabilitation exoskeletons is often realised based on experience and intuition, many processes can be computer-aided. This gives the opportunity to design lighter and more compact constructions. Hence, the devices can be fully wearable and have a wider range of motion. So far, mainly topology optimisation and parametric dimensional optimisations have been used for that. The presented study addresses the problem of automatic selection of the driving systems for exoskeletons. It consists of the literature review of the components used to actuate the joints of such constructions, optimisation algorithm development, and a case study on the EXOTIC exoskeleton. The method includes building a database of motors and gearboxes, computing inverse kinematics of a system to obtain angular trajectories from the task-oriented paths, iteration computing inverse dynamics to compute required torque and the search for the optimal solution according to the defined goal function. This approach enables single joint and multijoint optimisation, with the custom goal function minimising optionally masses, diameters or widths of the selected driving systems. The investigation consists of the 28 simulation trials for EXOTIC exoskeleton to compare results obtained for different aims. Moreover, to visualise the effect, the 1st DOF driving mechanism is redesigned to obtain its minimum width based on the optimisation results. The optimal choice reduced the actuation mechanism mass by 15.3%, while its total dimensions by 17.5%, 8.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The presented approach is easily transferable to any other active exoskeleton and can contribute to designing compact and lightweight constructions. This is particularly important in assistive rehabilitation and can also be used in industrial assistance processes.
Q1

Tailored gait-pattern generation and verification based on the dynamic analysis of the human musculoskeletal model
Shanmuga Prasad S., Kim Y.
This study presents a novel Forward Dynamic approach that integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to generate and optimize gait patterns with Inverse Dynamics analysis, tailored to individual users in the robot-assisted training platform. The resulting trajectories provide gait-trajectory planning using the developed gait-pattern simulator, enabling medical personnel to select customized tasks and training trajectories for users based on their training goals, subsequently transferring user-specific parameters to the exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation/training. By leveraging biomechanical data as reference (joint torque and force) from the Inverse Dynamic analysis, the method foregoes the necessity for experimental data, directly predicting joint angles and positions. To ensure the validity of the proposed method, we used a combined approach of numerical analysis and comparison with motion-capture data. This evaluation aimed to assess how closely the simulated results resembled real human walking motion for the lower-extremity joints.
Q1

Multi-physics tribo-dynamics simulation of lubricated translational joints in marine engines
Li R., Li G., Meng X., Sun R., Cheng W.
Lubricated translational joints are extensively utilized in power equipment. Due to the presence of clearance, the moving mass exhibits transverse motion within the guide rail in addition to its reciprocating motion. This transverse motion significantly influences the friction, wear, and service life of the friction pair. In this process, multi-physics factors such as fluid lubrication, structural deformation, and frictional heat generation interact with each other, making the tribo-dynamics characteristics very complex. In the current study, a new thermal-fluid-solid coupled method for modeling the tribo-dynamics of translational lubricated joints is presented, and it is applied to the crosshead slider-guide friction pair in marine engines. Research results show that the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the slider predicted by the model is consistent with the experimental ones, the correctness of the model is verified. The frictional heat generation has little effect on the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the crosshead slider under the rated operating conditions. However, the structure deformation induced by the external load intensifies the transverse motion of the crosshead slider. Compared with the model that ignored the deformation, the transverse displacement can be increased by 30%, which indicates that it is necessary to consider the multi-physics coupling effect.
Top-100
Citing journals
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
10039 citations, 9%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
9671 citations, 8.67%
|
|
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
1918 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Composite Structures
1878 citations, 1.68%
|
|
Journal of Sound and Vibration
1809 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Sensors
1611 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
1342 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Structural Health Monitoring
934 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
925 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
884 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Materials
878 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
855 citations, 0.77%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
825 citations, 0.74%
|
|
International Journal of Solids and Structures
768 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
682 citations, 0.61%
|
|
JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control
668 citations, 0.6%
|
|
AIAA Journal
614 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
610 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME
575 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Engineering Structures
552 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Nonlinear Dynamics
525 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
522 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Actuators
517 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Acta Mechanica
508 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
499 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
498 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
465 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Composites Part B: Engineering
465 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Micromachines
430 citations, 0.39%
|
|
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
415 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Smart Structures and Systems
410 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
409 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Thin-Walled Structures
409 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Aerospace Science and Technology
381 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
377 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Shock and Vibration
372 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Ultrasonics
371 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Polymers
344 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Energies
335 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
314 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Mechanics of Materials
308 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids
308 citations, 0.28%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
307 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
307 citations, 0.28%
|
|
IEEE Access
307 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Vibrational Engineering and Technologies
295 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
293 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
291 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
280 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Materials
274 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
272 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Composites Science and Technology
269 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Aircraft
266 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Soft Matter
254 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Microsystem Technologies
248 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Ferroelectrics
246 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
245 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Computers and Structures
242 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
242 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
240 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Archive of Applied Mechanics
238 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Scientific Reports
237 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Review of Scientific Instruments
232 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
231 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AIP Advances
230 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Applied Mathematical Modelling
230 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
224 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Key Engineering Materials
223 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Aerospace
219 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Structures
218 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Energy
212 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Materials Research Express
208 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Meccanica
205 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
205 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Mechatronics
200 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Materials and Design
200 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Materials
199 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Composite Materials
197 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines
197 citations, 0.18%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
197 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
194 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Engineering Science
192 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
191 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
189 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
189 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
185 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
180 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
174 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Energy
172 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE
170 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Polymer
170 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Materials Science & Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing
170 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics
166 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics
165 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 3
165 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
164 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Polymer Testing
162 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Measurement Science and Technology
160 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
156 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Mechanics
155 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
|
Elsevier
28088 citations, 25.17%
|
|
SAGE
13868 citations, 12.43%
|
|
IOP Publishing
12492 citations, 11.19%
|
|
Springer Nature
11023 citations, 9.88%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6976 citations, 6.25%
|
|
MDPI
6945 citations, 6.22%
|
|
Wiley
3955 citations, 3.54%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3237 citations, 2.9%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
2361 citations, 2.12%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2234 citations, 2%
|
|
ASME International
1798 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1166 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1145 citations, 1.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
1135 citations, 1.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
901 citations, 0.81%
|
|
World Scientific
765 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
741 citations, 0.66%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
712 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
496 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
459 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Techno-Press
404 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Emerald
347 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
334 citations, 0.3%
|
|
EDP Sciences
307 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
282 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
250 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
219 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
208 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SAE International
180 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Royal Society
160 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IOS Press
155 citations, 0.14%
|
|
145 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IGI Global
139 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
135 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IntechOpen
125 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
121 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
120 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Korean Society Rheology
112 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
105 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
103 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
97 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences
92 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
85 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Society of Rheology
78 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
67 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
66 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
60 citations, 0.05%
|
|
ASTM International
59 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Thomas Telford
58 citations, 0.05%
|
|
JVE International Ltd.
58 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
56 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Argentinean Association of Computational Mechanics
54 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
53 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Science in China Press
50 citations, 0.04%
|
|
46 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
45 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
39 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
38 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
35 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
34 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Oxford University Press
33 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
33 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences
33 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
32 citations, 0.03%
|
|
32 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Copernicus
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Polymer Society of Korea
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bialystok University of Technology
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexandria University
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
proceedings of the american control conference
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics
16 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
15 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Begell House
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Steel Construction
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SciELO
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Soc of Automotive Engineers, Inc
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Index Copernicus
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Annual Reviews
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House for Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (Publications)
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Rheology Japan
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Magnestics Society
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Virginia Tech
214 publications, 4.36%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
134 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
104 publications, 2.12%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
96 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
79 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Inha University
70 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Tohoku University
65 publications, 1.32%
|
|
North Carolina State University
63 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Michigan
63 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
57 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Chongqing University
55 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
54 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
52 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Ohio State University
51 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Tehran
49 publications, 1%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
48 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Texas A&M University
43 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Zhejiang University
41 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Sheffield
38 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Southeast University
33 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Arizona State University
33 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Wollongong
31 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Stanford University
31 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
31 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
29 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
28 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
28 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
28 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
28 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bristol
28 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
27 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
26 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
26 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
25 publications, 0.51%
|
|
ETH Zurich
25 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
23 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Tsinghua University
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Seoul National University
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Swansea University
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Purdue University
22 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Auckland
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
German Aerospace Center
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Tokyo
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Toronto
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Houston
21 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Tongji University
20 publications, 0.41%
|
|
A.V. Luikov Heat and Mass Transfer Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
National Taiwan University
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Sydney
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
19 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Zhejiang Normal University
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Waterloo
18 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
17 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Jilin University
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Agency for Defense Development
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Patras
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
City College of New York
16 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Florida State University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ningbo University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Konkuk University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Duke University
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Stuttgart
15 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Southampton
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Clemson University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Nagoya University
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Kentucky
14 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Beihang University
13 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
13 publications, 0.26%
|
|
National University of Singapore
13 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
34 publications, 4.39%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
21 publications, 2.71%
|
|
Zhejiang University
17 publications, 2.19%
|
|
University of Tehran
16 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
16 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Chongqing University
16 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
13 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
12 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Zhejiang Normal University
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Ningbo University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
China Jiliang University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Inha University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Southeast University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Tongji University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Jilin University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Auckland
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Houston
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Yanshan University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Tianjin University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Jiangsu University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Wollongong
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Chongqing University of Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Guangzhou University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Anhui Polytechnic University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Xi'An University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
North Carolina State University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Tohoku University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Wenzhou University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Khalifa University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Mandi
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Liège
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Lorraine
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Fuzhou University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nanjing Tech University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Chongqing Jiaotong University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Xiamen University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Shanghai University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Virginia Tech
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Michigan
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Western University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Sistan and Baluchestan
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Tsinghua University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Beihang University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
ETH Zurich
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Chongqing University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hebei University of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Xidian University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Beijing Information Science and Technology University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Civil Aviation University of China
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Donghua University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Yangtze University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Sorbonne University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Xihua University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Southampton
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shandong University of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1628, 33.16%
USA
1628 publications, 33.16%
|
China
|
China, 1029, 20.96%
China
1029 publications, 20.96%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 312, 6.36%
Japan
312 publications, 6.36%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 269, 5.48%
Republic of Korea
269 publications, 5.48%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 231, 4.71%
Iran
231 publications, 4.71%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 213, 4.34%
Germany
213 publications, 4.34%
|
France
|
France, 198, 4.03%
France
198 publications, 4.03%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 197, 4.01%
United Kingdom
197 publications, 4.01%
|
India
|
India, 180, 3.67%
India
180 publications, 3.67%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 165, 3.36%
Canada
165 publications, 3.36%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 159, 3.24%
Italy
159 publications, 3.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 144, 2.93%
Australia
144 publications, 2.93%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 72, 1.47%
Brazil
72 publications, 1.47%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 63, 1.28%
Singapore
63 publications, 1.28%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 40, 0.81%
Switzerland
40 publications, 0.81%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 38, 0.77%
Poland
38 publications, 0.77%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 36, 0.73%
Netherlands
36 publications, 0.73%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 33, 0.67%
Turkey
33 publications, 0.67%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 31, 0.63%
Malaysia
31 publications, 0.63%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 30, 0.61%
Spain
30 publications, 0.61%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 27, 0.55%
Belarus
27 publications, 0.55%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 26, 0.53%
Israel
26 publications, 0.53%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 24, 0.49%
New Zealand
24 publications, 0.49%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 22, 0.45%
Saudi Arabia
22 publications, 0.45%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 20, 0.41%
Greece
20 publications, 0.41%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 18, 0.37%
Russia
18 publications, 0.37%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 18, 0.37%
Portugal
18 publications, 0.37%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 17, 0.35%
Belgium
17 publications, 0.35%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 17, 0.35%
Denmark
17 publications, 0.35%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 15, 0.31%
Egypt
15 publications, 0.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 13, 0.26%
Austria
13 publications, 0.26%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 13, 0.26%
Vietnam
13 publications, 0.26%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 0.26%
Mexico
13 publications, 0.26%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 13, 0.26%
UAE
13 publications, 0.26%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 13, 0.26%
Czech Republic
13 publications, 0.26%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 13, 0.26%
Sweden
13 publications, 0.26%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 12, 0.24%
Ireland
12 publications, 0.24%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 11, 0.22%
Morocco
11 publications, 0.22%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 11, 0.22%
Slovakia
11 publications, 0.22%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 10, 0.2%
Lebanon
10 publications, 0.2%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 0.2%
Finland
10 publications, 0.2%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 9, 0.18%
Tunisia
9 publications, 0.18%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 0.16%
Norway
8 publications, 0.16%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 8, 0.16%
Thailand
8 publications, 0.16%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 8, 0.16%
South Africa
8 publications, 0.16%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 6, 0.12%
Iraq
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 6, 0.12%
Luxembourg
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.12%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.12%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.1%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 5, 0.1%
Iceland
5 publications, 0.1%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 4, 0.08%
Algeria
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.08%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.08%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.08%
Oman
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.08%
Romania
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 4, 0.08%
Serbia
4 publications, 0.08%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 4, 0.08%
USSR
4 publications, 0.08%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.06%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.06%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.06%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.06%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 3, 0.06%
Cameroon
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.06%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.06%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.06%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.06%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.06%
Chile
3 publications, 0.06%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.04%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.04%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.04%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.04%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.02%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.02%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 1, 0.02%
Moldova
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.02%
Peru
1 publication, 0.02%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.02%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.02%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (45 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
China
|
China, 356, 45.94%
China
356 publications, 45.94%
|
USA
|
USA, 88, 11.35%
USA
88 publications, 11.35%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 58, 7.48%
Iran
58 publications, 7.48%
|
India
|
India, 56, 7.23%
India
56 publications, 7.23%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 37, 4.77%
Canada
37 publications, 4.77%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 31, 4%
Germany
31 publications, 4%
|
France
|
France, 30, 3.87%
France
30 publications, 3.87%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 27, 3.48%
United Kingdom
27 publications, 3.48%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 22, 2.84%
Japan
22 publications, 2.84%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 20, 2.58%
Republic of Korea
20 publications, 2.58%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 19, 2.45%
Australia
19 publications, 2.45%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 15, 1.94%
Brazil
15 publications, 1.94%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 14, 1.81%
Italy
14 publications, 1.81%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 1.42%
Turkey
11 publications, 1.42%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 9, 1.16%
Vietnam
9 publications, 1.16%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 1.03%
New Zealand
8 publications, 1.03%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.9%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.9%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.77%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.77%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 5, 0.65%
Russia
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.65%
Austria
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.52%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.52%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 0.52%
Spain
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.52%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 0.52%
Netherlands
4 publications, 0.52%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.52%
UAE
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.52%
Poland
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 0.52%
Switzerland
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.39%
Greece
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.39%
Israel
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 3, 0.39%
Iraq
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.39%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.39%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.39%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.39%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.26%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.26%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.26%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.26%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 0.26%
Cameroon
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.26%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.26%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.13%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.13%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.13%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.13%
Norway
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.13%
Oman
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.13%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.13%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.13%
Finland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.13%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.13%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (22 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
2 profile journal articles
RAMA A.
41 publications,
446 citations
h-index: 13
1 profile journal article
Mardani Ali
🥼 🤝
PhD in Engineering, Professor, Professor of the Turkish Academy of Sciences

Bursa Uludağ University
127 publications,
2 292 citations
h-index: 27
Research interests
Cement materials
Concrete
Durability of concrete
1 profile journal article
Eremeyev Viktor

University of Cagliari

Gdańsk University of Technology
303 publications,
7 232 citations
h-index: 47
1 profile journal article
Wawrzała Paweł
🤝 🥼
Silesian University of Technology
34 publications,
193 citations
h-index: 8