Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Matrix
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Biological Chemistry
(347 citations)

Connective Tissue Research
(179 citations)

Matrix Biology
(169 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Thomas Jefferson University
(16 publications)

University of Alabama at Birmingham
(9 publications)

Lund University
(8 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 458
Q2

Automated Monitoring of Web User Interfaces
Visconti E., Tsigkanos C., Nenzi L.
Application development for the modern Web involves sophisticated engineering workflows – including user interface (UI) aspects. Such user interfaces comprise Web elements that are typically created with HTML/CSS markup and JavaScript-like languages, yielding Web documents. Their testing entails performing checks to examine visual and structural parts of the resulting UI software against requirements such as usability, accessibility, performance, or, increasingly, compliance with standards. However, current techniques are largely ad-hoc and tailor-made to specific classes of requirements or Web technologies and extensively require human-in-the-loop qualitative evaluations. Web UI evaluation so far has lacked formal foundations, which would provide assurances of compliance with requirements in an automatic manner.
To this end,
we devise a methodology and accompanying technical framework for web UIs. In our approach, requirements are formally specified in a spatio-temporal logic able to capture both the layout of visual components as well as how they change over time, as a user interacts with them. The technique we advocate is independent of the underlying technologies a Web application may be developed with, as well as the browser and operating system used.
To concretely support the specification and evaluation of UI requirements, our framework is grounded on open-source tools for instrumenting, analyzing, and reporting spatio-temporal behaviors in webpages. We demonstrate our approach in practice over
Web accessibility standards posing challenges for automated verification.
Q2

Trust Models Go to the Web: Learning How to Trust Strangers
De Meo P., Prifti Y., Provetti A.
We study emerging traits of interpersonal and social trust in online social networks of needs (OSNNs), where trust interactions start online and evolve into in-person meetings. We present a lightweight web scraping solution to harness data from online social networks; thanks to it we were able to monitor a nation-wide portal for childcare and see the evolution of online reviews from both families and carers. We analysed the data by first considering topological information to test centrality metrics as proxies for trustworthiness. Next, we focused on features/profile analysis and tested the Castelfranchi–Falcone trust model from psychology (CF-T), fitting it to online reviews of childcare services. Even though such reviews are relatively scarce and seemingly skewed, we feature-engineered the CF-T model to predict the evolution of reviews, treated as proxies for trust. By aggregating CF-T scores at the regional level, we discovered a strong correlation with per capita GDP, which suggests that high levels of trust in social networks of needs reflect social capital.
Q2

What Did My Users Experience? Discovering Visual Stimuli on Graphical User Interfaces of the Web
Menges R., Staab S., Schaefer C., Walber T., Kumar C.
Main tasks of usability experts for Web sites comprise the analysis of user interaction behavior on graphical user interfaces, the discovery of issues, and the derivation of improvements to the interface. The analysis of user interaction behavior and corresponding discovery of issues are made difficult by modern Web interfaces that incorporate dynamic interface elements and that orchestrate complex reactions to user responses. We propose a semi-automated approach for discovering visual stimuli, which capture summarized views of the interface as encountered by users during interaction. Discovered visual stimuli allow for meaningful aggregations of user interactions based on what users encountered on the interface such that the analysis by usability experts can relate the interface views with user interactions correctly and identify arising issues. We provide WebVSD as an implementation of the approach and perform a set of evaluations with real-world Web sites that show the accuracy of proposed methods in isolation and in the tool chain, as well as case studies and a survey of usability experts indicating the usefulness of the suggested approach.
Q2

BNoteToDanmu: Category-Guided Note-to-Danmu Conversion Method for Learning on Video Sharing Platforms
Yu F., Zhang P., Qiao S., Ding X., Lu T., Gu N.
Danmu (or “bullet screen”), a popular feature on video sharing platforms, plays a crucial role in facilitating knowledge sharing and learning. In recent years, danmu has drawn attention to automatic generation methods. However, existing methods mostly utilize limited content sources, such as the video itself (e.g., subtitles) and neighboring danmus, while other valuable sources remain underexplored. To this end, this paper proposes a Category-Guided Note-to-Danmu conversion model (CG-NTD) by leveraging user-generated notes. The model is designed to identify unique contents within the notes and convert them into danmus, while also showing the source note categories. CG-NTD classifies the notes by fusing them with subtitle and neighboring danmu features. Then, it uses a cross-attention mechanism to integrate the note’s category feature with note, subtitle, and danmu contexts, to identify three keywords from the notes as the generated danmus. Using Bilibili as the research site, we implement a plugin prototype named BNoteToDanmu. Automatic and human evaluations reveal that CG-NTD outperforms BiLSTM, mT5, and BERT baselines in Precision, Recall, and F1-score metrics, and generates more understandable and relevant danmus than ChatGPT. Moreover, the plugin demonstrates promising applications, such as assisting users in viewing videos, posting danmus, and recognizing high-quality notes. These findings offer insights into leveraging user creations to generate danmu to enhance its learning value on video sharing platforms.
Q2

Towards Effective Time-Aware Language Representation: Exploring Enhanced Temporal Understanding in Language Models
Wang J., Jatowt A., Cai Y.
In the evolving field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), understanding the temporal context of text is increasingly critical for applications requiring advanced temporal reasoning. Traditional pre-trained language models like BERT, which rely on synchronic document collections such as BookCorpus and Wikipedia, often fall short in effectively capturing and leveraging temporal information. To address this limitation, we introduce BiTimeBERT 2.0, a novel time-aware language model pre-trained on a temporal news article collection. BiTimeBERT 2.0 incorporates temporal information through three innovative pre-training objectives: Extended Time-Aware Masked Language Modeling (ETAMLM), Document Dating (DD), and Time-Sensitive Entity Replacement (TSER). Each objective is specifically designed to target a distinct dimension of temporal information: ETAMLM enhances the model’s understanding of temporal contexts and relations, DD integrates document timestamps as explicit chronological markers, and TSER focuses on the temporal dynamics of ”Person” entities. Moreover, our refined corpus preprocessing strategy reduces training time by nearly 53%, making BiTimeBERT 2.0 significantly more efficient while maintaining high performance. Experimental results show that BiTimeBERT 2.0 achieves substantial improvements across a broad range of time-related tasks and excels on datasets spanning extensive temporal ranges. These findings underscore BiTimeBERT 2.0’s potential as a powerful tool for advancing temporal reasoning in NLP.
Q2

Exploring Suicide Factors in Online Discourse: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Reddit
Dan E., Zhu J., Jin R.
Suicide remains a critical global health issue, with rising numbers claiming more lives each year despite ongoing prevention efforts. Current research has extensively explored factors influencing suicidal tendencies, emphasizing trauma, mental health disorders, and social relationships. However, traditional studies often relied on traditional data sources and often examined risk factors in isolation, which may not fully capture the dynamics observed in social media platforms. To address these limitations, our study utilizes data from r/SuicideWatch and r/Teenagers to analyze the emotional sentiment and explore themes associated with suicidal ideation, with r/Teenagers serving as a comparative reference. By leveraging natural language processing (NLP) techniques and statistical methodologies, including sentiment analysis and BERTopic modeling, we aim to gain deeper insights into the factors contributing to suicidal thoughts. Using TextBlob, our findings reveal a significant difference in sentiment between the two subreddits, with r/SuicideWatch posts predominantly expressing challenges and distressing emotions. Through BERTopic analysis, we identified key themes such as emotional challenges related to romantic relationships, academic pressure, and substance use concerns in r/SuicideWatch, highlighting their strong association with suicidal ideation. While r/Teenagers had some similar themes regarding struggles with loneliness and academics, the topics were focused more on general adolescent concerns. These findings demonstrate that advanced NLP methods can effectively analyze large-scale social media data, providing valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of suicidal ideation and emphasizing the need for targeted intervention strategies. Suggested improvements include enhancing relationship counseling and peer support networks, implementing school-based mental health programs, and leveraging social media for real-time support and awareness campaigns. By understanding the emotional and thematic nuances of online discussions, these strategies can more effectively address the multifaceted factors contributing to mental health challenges and reduce the risk of suicidal behavior.
Q2

CoDÆN: Benchmarks and Comparison of Evolutionary Community Detection Algorithms for Dynamic Networks
Paoletti G., Gioacchini L., Mellia M., Vassio L., Almeida J.
Web data are often modelled as complex networks in which entities interact and form communities. Nevertheless, web data evolves over time, and network communities change alongside it. This makes Community Detection (CD) in dynamic graphs a relevant problem, calling for
evolutionary
CD algorithms. The choice and evaluation of such algorithm performance is challenging because of the lack of a comprehensive set of benchmarks and specific metrics. To address these challenges, we propose CoDÆN – COmmunity Detection Algorithms in Evolving Networks – a benchmarking framework for evolutionary CD algorithms in dynamic networks, that we offer as open source to the community. CoDÆN allows us to generate synthetic community-structured graphs with known ground truth and design evolving scenarios combining nine basic graph transformations that modify edges, nodes, and communities. We propose three complementary metrics (i.e. Correctness, Delay, and Stability) to compare evolutionary CD algorithms.
Armed with CoDÆN, we consider three evolutionary modularity-based CD approaches, dissecting their performance to gauge the trade-off between the stability of the communities and their correctness. Next, we compare the algorithms in real Web-oriented datasets, confirming such a trade-off. Our findings reveal that algorithms that introduce memory in the graph maximise stability but add delay when abrupt changes occur. Conversely, algorithms that introduce memory by initialising the CD algorithms with the previous solution fail to identify the split and birth of new communities. These observations underscore the value of CoDÆN in facilitating the study and comparison of alternative evolutionary community detection algorithms.
Q2

PORTRAIT: A Hybrid Approach to Create Extractive Ground-truth Summary for Disaster Event
Garg P., Chakraborty R., Dandapat S.
Nowadays, X (formerly known as Twitter) is an important source of information and latest updates during ongoing events, such as disaster events. However, the huge number of tweets posted during a disaster makes identification of relevant information highly challenging. Therefore, a summary of the tweets can help the decision-makers to ensure efficient allocation of resources among the affected population. There exist several automated summarization approaches that can generate a summary given the tweets related to a disaster. Development of these automated summarization approaches require availability of ground-truth summary of the dataset for verification. However, the number of publicly available datasets along with the ground-truth summary for disaster events are still inadequate. To improve this situation, we need to create more ground-truth summaries. Existing approaches for ground-truth summary generation rely on the annotators’ wisdom and intuition. This process requires immense human effort and significant time. Moreover, the selection of the important tweets from the humongous set of input tweets often results in sub-optimal choice of tweets in the final summary. Therefore, to handle these challenges, we propose a hybrid approach (PORTRAIT) for ground-truth summary generation, where we partly automate the procedure to improve the quality of ground-truth summary and reduce human effort and time. We validate the effectiveness of PORTRAIT on nine disaster events through quantitative and qualitative analysis. We prepare and release the ground-truth summaries for nine disaster events, which consist of both natural and man-made disaster events belonging to five different continents.
Q2

“Double vaccinated, 5G boosted!”: Learning Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccination from Social Media
Chen N., Chen X., Zhong Z., Pang J.
The sudden onset of the recently concluded COVID-19 pandemic has driven substantial progress in various scientific fields. One notable example is the comprehension of public vaccination attitudes and the timely monitoring of their fluctuations through social media platforms. This approach can serve as a cost-effective means to supplement surveys in gathering public vaccine hesitancy levels. In this paper, we propose a deep-learning framework leveraging textual posts on social media to extract and track users’ vaccination stances in near real-time. Compared to previous works, we integrate into the framework the recent posts of a user’s social network friends to collaboratively detect the user’s genuine attitude towards vaccination. Based on our annotated dataset from X (previously known as Twitter), the models instantiated from our framework can increase the performance of attitude extraction by up to 23% compared to the state-of-the-art text-only models. Using this framework, we successfully confirm the feasibility of using social media to track the evolution of vaccination attitudes in real life. In addition, we illustrate the generality of our framework in extracting other public opinions such as political ideology. We further show one practical use of our framework by validating the possibility of forecasting a user’s vaccine hesitancy changes with information perceived from social media.
Q2

MSA-Net: A Multi-Scale Information Diffusion Model Awaring User Activity Level
Tang Y., Piao J., Wang H., Wang Y., Li Y.
Modeling information diffusion on social networks can be used to guide the prediction and control of information propagation and improve the structure and functionality of social networks. Existing information diffusion prediction methods can predict information diffusion paths and its volume by modeling social network structure and user behavior. However, none of the existing methods take user activity level, which is proved to be critical in modeling the information diffusion process, into account, thus weaken the prediction accuracy. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a Multi-Scale Activity Network (MSA-Net) to capture topological and historical affect features for different scales and to predict the users who will be affected at a specific future timestamp with the help of user activity level. Specifically, we first learn the network representation of three scales or levels: micro-scale, meso-scale, and macro-scale, which refers to the user level, intra-community level, and inter-community level, respectively. Then, we introduce the user activity level for each user by using user degree and average number of tweets per time unit to model the individual differences of users to achieve a more accurate prediction. Extensive experiments based on real-world datasets show that MSA-Net achieves a 6.14% improvement in terms of precision, a 6.74% improvement in terms of recall metrics, a 4.26% improvement in terms of F1-score, a 3.15% improvement in terms of MAP, and a 25.78% improvement in terms of NRMSE over the best existing baseline. The code and data are available at https://github.com/tsinghua-fib-lab/MSA-Net.
Q2

Twitter User Geolocation Based on Location Feature Enhancement
Zhang M., Luo X., Huang N., Liu Y., Du S.
User location discovery from social media is crucial for location-based services like emergency awareness and event monitoring. Existing approaches generally integrate user-generated text features and social relationships, but insufficiently explore location-specific features and geographically proximate relationships, leading to suboptimal accuracy. In this paper, we propose a Twitter user geolocation method based on location feature enhancement, to better capture the location characteristics in users’ tweets and social relationships. Specifically, a user tweet representation algorithm based on location feature separation (TwLS) is designed. By leveraging words’ location-aware weight matrix and pre-trained embeddings, TwLS calculates a tweet representation for each user in every location, explicitly indicating the relevance between users and various locations. Additionally, we develop the local celebrity discovery method (LocCel) to construct social networks by identifying and preserving geographically concentrated high-degree nodes while filtering noise. Thereby LocCel enhances local relationships and strengthens location-proximate connections within the user social network. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that our method outperforms seven baselines, improving user geolocation accuracy by 3.1% ∼ 8.1% and 1.8% ∼ 8.8%, while reducing median error by 22.2% ∼ 52.8% and 19.4% ∼ 50.7%, respectively.
Q2

Unsupervised Framing Analysis for Social Media Discourse in Polarizing Events
Sarmiento H., Córdova R., Ortiz J., Bravo-Marquez F., Santos M., Valenzuela S.
This study investigates the concept of
frames
in the realm of online polarization, with a focus on social media platforms. The research extends the understanding of how frames—emerging, complex, and often subtle concepts—become prominent in online conversations that are polarized. The study proposes a comprehensive methodology for identifying and characterizing these frames, integrating machine learning techniques, network analysis algorithms, and natural language processing tools. This method aims for generalizability across multiple platforms and types of user engagement. Two novel metrics,
homogeneity
and
relevancy
are introduced for the rigorous evaluation of identified frame candidates.
Grounded in several foundational presumptions, including the role of topics and multi-word expressions in framing, the study sheds light on how frames emerge and gain significance within digital communities. The research questions explored include the methods for identifying frames, the variability and significance of these frames, and the effectiveness of different computational techniques in this context.
To validate the approach, we present a case study of the 2021 Chilean presidential election, using data from both Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. This real-world application allows for the examination of how frames fluctuate in response to events and the specific mechanisms of platforms. Overall, the study makes several key contributions to the field, offering new insights and methodologies for analyzing the complexities of online polarization. It serves as groundwork for future research on the dynamics of online communities, especially those associated with distinctly polarized events.
Q2

From Nodes to Knowledge: Exploring Social Network Analysis in Education
Singh S.S., Muhuri S., Kumar S., Barua J.
In the evolving education landscape, this survey investigates the integration and transformation of educational paradigms using social network analysis (SNA). This article examines the fundamentals of SNA, including nodes, edges, centrality metrics, and network dynamics, for a comprehensive understanding of the education domain. It guides researchers through various applications of SNA in education, such as student–teacher networks and institutional collaborations, highlighting the advantages and challenges of these complex interactions. The article assesses the methodologies used in educational SNA, including data collection strategies and the associated ethical considerations. The survey also discusses various case studies and applications where SNA facilitates well-informed decision-making, enhanced academic collaboration, and the evaluation of student performance. This article focuses on the transformative potential of SNA and acknowledges the limitations, ethical dilemmas, and technological challenges in the field. It concludes with a forward-looking perspective on the future of SNA in education, showcasing supportive technological advancement. This survey highlights the evolution of SNA since its incorporation into educational research and practices.
Q2

Ransomware Over Modern Web Browsers: A Novel Strain and a New Defense Mechanism
Oz H., Tuncay G., Aris A., Acar A., Babun L., Uluagac S.
Ransomware is an increasingly prevalent form of malware targeting end-users, governments, and businesses. As it has evolved, adversaries added new capabilities to their arsenal. We propose a next-generation browser-based ransomware,
RøB
, which performs its malicious actions via web technologies, File System Access API (FSA) and WebAssembly (Wasm).
RøB
uses this API through the victims’ browsers; hence, it does not require the victims to download and install malicious binaries. We performed extensive evaluations with three different OSs, 23 file formats, 29 distinct directories, five cloud providers, and four antivirus solutions. Our evaluations show that
RøB
can encrypt various types of files in the local and cloud-integrated directories, external storage devices, and network-shared folders of victims. Our experiments also reveal that popular cloud solutions, Box Individual and Apple iCloud can be severely affected by
RøB
. Moreover, we conducted tests with commercial antivirus software such as AVG, Avast, Kaspersky, and Malware Bytes that perform sensitive directory and suspicious behavior monitoring against ransomware. We verified that
RøB
can evade these antivirus software and encrypt victim files. Moreover, existing ransomware detection solutions in the literature also cannot be a remedy against
RøB
due to its distinct features. Therefore, in this paper, we also propose
RøBguard
, a new detection system for
RøB
-like attacks.
RøBguard
monitors the web applications that use the FSA API via function hooking and uses a machine learning classifier to detect
RøB
-like attacks. We implemented a proof of concept version of
RøBguard
and our evaluation results show that
RøBguard
can detect
RøB
-like browser-based ransomware attacks effectively. We also provide future research directions that should be addressed in this domain.
Q2

Crumbled Cookies: Exploring E-commerce Websites? Cookie Policies with Data Protection Regulations
Singh N., Do Y., Yu Y., Fouad I., Kim J., Kim H.
Despite stringent data protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and other country-specific laws, numerous websites continue to use cookies to track user activities, raising significant privacy concerns. This study aims to investigate the compliance of e-commerce websites with these regulations from a cookie perspective and explore potential variations in cookie policies across different countries. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 360 popular e-commerce websites (44,323 cookies) across multiple countries, examining cookie attributes and their potential links to privacy and security breaches. Our findings revealed that 73% of third-party cookies function as tracker cookies, with around 40% breaching lifecycle regulations. Additionally, 85% are vulnerable to potential cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, while only 349 out of 44,323 adhere to robust measures aimed at combating cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. We also discovered instances of masquerading cookies, where third-party cookies disguise themselves as first-party cookies, enabling unauthorized user tracking without consent. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to comprehensively analyze the compliance of e-commerce websites with the GDPR, CCPA, and country-specific regulations concerning cookie policies across different jurisdictions. Our findings highlight the urgent need for uniform and consistent cookie policies across websites and jurisdictions, as well as robust enforcement mechanisms and increased transparency to ensure compliance with data protection regulations. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on privacy protection and underscores the importance of addressing the challenges posed by insecure cookie practices in the e-commerce sector.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
347 citations, 4.5%
|
|
Connective Tissue Research
179 citations, 2.32%
|
|
Matrix Biology
169 citations, 2.19%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
120 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Arthritis & Rheumatism
118 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
98 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Archives of Oral Biology
86 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
84 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Bone
77 citations, 1%
|
|
Matrix
72 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Biomaterials
68 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
67 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Dental Research
63 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Periodontal Research
61 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
60 citations, 0.78%
|
|
PLoS ONE
53 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Journal of Cell Science
51 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Physiology
50 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
50 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
45 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Calcified Tissue International
45 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
43 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Tissue Engineering
42 citations, 0.55%
|
|
FEBS Letters
41 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
40 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
37 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
36 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Experimental Cell Research
32 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
31 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
31 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Anatomical Record
31 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Developmental Dynamics
30 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Scientific Reports
30 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Spine
29 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
28 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
27 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Tissue Engineering - Part A.
26 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Clinica Chimica Acta
26 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
25 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Cell and Tissue Research
25 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
25 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
24 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
24 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects
23 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
23 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Micron
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Animal
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Cancer
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
21 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Journal of Pathology
21 citations, 0.27%
|
|
The Histochemical Journal
21 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Periodontology
20 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Kidney International
20 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Microscopy Research and Technique
20 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Gene
19 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Wound Repair and Regeneration
19 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Analytical Biochemistry
19 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Atherosclerosis
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Urology
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Poultry Science
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
European Journal of Oral Sciences
17 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Hepatology
16 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering C
16 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Structural Biology
16 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
16 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Toxicon
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Periodontology 2000
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
British Journal of Dermatology
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physiology
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
15 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Cell Biology
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Development (Cambridge)
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Tissue and Cell
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Annals of Anatomy
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Biology
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Acta Histochemica
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Oral Diseases
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Methods in Enzymology
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Hepatology
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Circulation Research
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biochemistry
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Journal of Sports Medicine
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Differentiation
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Growth Factors
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Meat Science
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bone and Mineral
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Review of Cytology
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biochimie
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Glycobiology
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Elsevier
2510 citations, 32.57%
|
|
Wiley
1565 citations, 20.31%
|
|
Springer Nature
686 citations, 8.9%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
373 citations, 4.84%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
353 citations, 4.58%
|
|
SAGE
207 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
171 citations, 2.22%
|
|
MDPI
111 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
109 citations, 1.41%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
91 citations, 1.18%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
72 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Oxford University Press
71 citations, 0.92%
|
|
American Physiological Society
63 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
63 citations, 0.82%
|
|
BMJ
51 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
46 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
45 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
29 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
28 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
22 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
18 citations, 0.23%
|
|
ASME International
16 citations, 0.21%
|
|
14 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
13 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
12 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Reviews
11 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Japanese Association for Oral Biology
9 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
9 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Royal Society
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
8 citations, 0.1%
|
|
S. Karger AG
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD)
7 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOP Publishing
6 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Association for Dental Research
6 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Portland Press
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
World Scientific
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Biophysical Society
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SciELO
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bioscientifica
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Impact Journals
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Allen Press
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Keio Gijuku Daigaku
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tohoku University Medical Press
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society for Cell Biology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sports Physical Therapy Section
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Medknow
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Society Histology & Cytology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Periodontology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Oral Pathology
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
16 publications, 5.46%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
9 publications, 3.07%
|
|
Lund University
8 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Boston University
8 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 2.05%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Tennessee
5 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Liège
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Turku
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Pavia
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Osaka University
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Institut Pasteur
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Connecticut Health
4 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Padua
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Aichi Gakuin University
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Miami
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Uppsala University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Oncology Referral Center
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Adelaide
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Royal North Shore Hospital
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Kyushu University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Western University
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Hadassah Medical Center
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Oulu
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Verona
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Messina
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Sassari
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Tokyo Medical and Dental University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Tokyo University of Agriculture
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Tufts University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Rush University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Nagoya University
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 129, 44.03%
USA
129 publications, 44.03%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 30, 10.24%
United Kingdom
30 publications, 10.24%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 19, 6.48%
Japan
19 publications, 6.48%
|
France
|
France, 14, 4.78%
France
14 publications, 4.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 4.1%
Canada
12 publications, 4.1%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 3.75%
Italy
11 publications, 3.75%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 11, 3.75%
Sweden
11 publications, 3.75%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 3.07%
Finland
9 publications, 3.07%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 2.39%
Germany
7 publications, 2.39%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 2.39%
Australia
7 publications, 2.39%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 7, 2.39%
Belgium
7 publications, 2.39%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 7, 2.39%
Netherlands
7 publications, 2.39%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 1.37%
Brazil
4 publications, 1.37%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 1.37%
South Africa
4 publications, 1.37%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 1.02%
Israel
3 publications, 1.02%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.68%
Russia
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.68%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.68%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.68%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.68%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 2, 0.68%
USSR
2 publications, 0.68%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.34%
Austria
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.34%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.34%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.34%
Greece
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.34%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.34%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.34%
Spain
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.34%
Norway
1 publication, 0.34%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.34%
Romania
1 publication, 0.34%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|