Tissue Engineering - Part A.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
3.5
SJR
0.825
CiteScore
9.2
Categories
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biomaterials
Biomedical Engineering
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemical Engineering
Engineering
Materials Science
Years of issue
2008-2025
journal names
Tissue Engineering - Part A.
TISSUE ENG PT A
Top-3 citing journals

Tissue Engineering - Part A.
(4313 citations)

Biomaterials
(3730 citations)

Acta Biomaterialia
(3654 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Stanford University
(86 publications)

Harvard University
(82 publications)

Seoul National University
(68 publications)

Stanford University
(16 publications)

University of Michigan
(16 publications)

Kyoto University
(15 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 464
Q3

A Novel Scale to Measure Nursing Students’ Fear of Artificial Intelligence: Development and Validation
Albikawi Z., Abuadas M.
Background
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is revolutionizing patient care and clinical practice, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. However, it has also sparked concerns among nursing students about job displacement, reliance on technology, and the potential loss of human qualities like empathy and compassion, to this date, there is no established scale measuring the level of fear, especially among nursing students.
Aim
To develop and validate a scale to assess nursing students' fear of artificial intelligence.
Methods
The current study employed a cross-sectional design, involving a total of 225 Saudi nursing students enrolled in a nursing college. The scale's construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results
A comprehensive review of the literature addressing fear of AI guided the development of the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (FtAIS). An initial pool of items was subjected to a content validity assessment by an expert panel, which refined the scale to 10 items categorized into two dimensions: job issues and humanity. The two-factor structure was responsible for 73.52% of the total variance. The scale items' reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.803. The reliability coefficients for the two subscales, job issues, and humanity, are 0.804 and 0.801, respectively. The confirmatory factor model demonstrated a good model fit. The scale's convergent and discriminant validity were both confirmed.
Conclusion
The FtAIS is a rigorously developed and validated tool for measuring nursing students' fears toward AI. These findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and training programs that could mitigate AI-related fears and prepare nursing students for its integration into healthcare. The scale offers practical applications for educators and policymakers in addressing AI fear and fostering its confident adoption to enhance patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Q3

Educational Content Focusing on Basic Skills for Novice Nurses to Work Independently in Intensive Care Units in Japan: A Qualitative Study
Imamura S., Tsujimoto T., Fujii M., Takeshita Y., Nagayasu M., Inoue T.
Introduction/Objectives
In Japan, novice nurses are assigned to intensive care units immediately after graduation and are expected to become independent within about a year. Therefore, in addition to long-term, comprehensive educational programs, establishing an educational system that allows novice nurses to learn intensive care unit nursing while working is necessary. This study explored senior nurses’ expectations for novice nurses working independently in the intensive care unit after one year and identified the foundational skills needed for novice nurses to achieve this independence.
Methods
The research collaborators were eight senior nurses working in the intensive care unit of an acute care hospital. They were recruited from four facilities and had five or more years of clinical experience. The study used semi-structured interviews to generate data about the reports, contacts, and consultations they would expect from novice nurses to determine their readiness to become independent.
Results
This study clarified the circumstances under which novice nurses with no practical experience should voluntarily seek support to work as independent nurses one year after being assigned to an intensive care unit. It reflects the characteristics of patients who require intensive management, such as “assistance with central line insertion and removal” and “evaluation of vital signs,” as well as other advanced procedures.
Conclusion
This study clarified the basic skills required for novice nurses and identified the areas in which they should seek support. In the future, this method may be utilized in the early stages of novice nurse education.
Q3

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Resilience Training among Nursing Professionals in Saudi Arabia
Alanazi H.Q., Alreshidi N.M., Alrimali A.M., Alshammari W.D., Elsharif N.E., Teodosio M.T., Gonzales K.A., Gaspar F.B., Tabungar D.M., Alshammri M.A.
Introduction
Nursing is a demanding profession that calls for resilience and stress management. Nevertheless, many nurses do not receive adequate training in these areas. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of resilience training programs on work-related stress and resilience levels among nurses in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A quasi-experiment intervention study employing pre- and post-test approaches was conducted from January to March, 2024, to assess a resilience training program for nurses in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Fifty nurses from sixteen hospitals were divided into two groups in the stratified random sample: the intervention group (n = 25) and the control group (n = 25). Data was collected using an online survey at baseline and three months post-training, with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale employed for measuring outcomes. The paired samples t-tests for statistical analysis were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.
Results
Significant improvements were noted in the intervention group, with resilience sores improving to 79.50 from 77.12 (p = 0.015) and stress levels decreasing to 63.54 from 65.08 (p = 0.020). No significant changes were noted in the control group.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that resilience training programs can significantly enhance resilience levels and reduce work-related stress. These results underscore the importance of implementing structured resilience training to better equip nurses for the challenges of their demanding profession.
Q3

Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison between Automatic and Conventional Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults with Hypertension
Curi-Curi P.J., Santiago-González N., Valencia-Ledezma O.E., García-Rascon R., Hernandez-Roque E., Oliver-Flores E.Y., Curiel-Ramirez G.
Background
Blood pressure measurement is a main clinical procedure used for the detection of Systemic Arterial Hypertension. Mercury sphygmomanometer, in combination with auscultation technique, is still recognized as the gold standard for non-invasive blood pressure measurement.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy between automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices versus mercury sphygmomanometers in hospitalized patients.
Methods
A prospective, analytical and cross-sectional diagnostic method study was designed to compare the concordance, positive and negative predictive value, the sensitivity and specificity of automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The devices were divided into two groups: the reference standard which was mercury sphygmomanometer (n=150), versus the index tests, that were wrist device (n=150), semi-automatic sphygmomanometer (n=150) and vital signs monitor (n=150).
Results
The monitor detected more cases (69%) of systemic arterial hypertension (p 0.0019, OR 5.3). The semiautomatic sphygmomanometer identified more true positives (n=22) and true negatives (n=113). It also showed a higher diagnostic accuracy: 67% sensitivity (p 0.0576, OR 0.5) and 97% specificity (p 0.088, OR 3.2). A mean arterial pressure variation <5mmHg of 65% was found with the semiautomatic sphygmomanometer (p <0.0001, OR 0.02) and 61% with the vital signs monitor (p <0.0001, OR 0.12). Best concordance of blood pressure between reference standard versus index test was obtained in the following order: Semi-automatic sphygmomanometer, Vital signs monitor, and Wrist device.
Conclusion
The use of vital signs monitor to measure blood pressure is recommended in all patients, although semiautomatic sphygmomanometer is more sensitive for the detection of systemic arterial hypertension.
Q3

Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania
Shayo P.M., Zewdie E.A., Byashalira K.C., Chamba N.G., Mbelele P.M., Bygbjerg I.C., Lillebaek T., Christensen D.L., Heysell S.K., Mpagama S.G.
Background
Managing tuberculosis (TB) patients with comorbidities requires a holistic and patient-centered approach. This study evaluated patient-centered care (PCC) experiences among TB patients with multimorbidity under the Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Program in Tanzania (ADEPT), with a focus on the TB/diabetes mellitus (DM) co-epidemic targeted by the program.
Methods
A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted involving TB patients with associated comorbidities receiving care from nurses trained in PCC through the ADEPT program. Patients were assessed for their interpretation of how they received PCC across eight dimensions of care.
Results
All 39 participants with TB had at least one comorbidity (100%). The most common multi-morbidities were TB/HIV (59.0%) and TB/DM (12.8%). Evaluation of needs, values, and preferences revealed that participants strongly felt healthcare workers considered these aspects (mean score = 4.53; scale 1 minimum- strongly disagree to 5 maximum- strongly agree). Subsequent analysis showed varying evaluations across dimensions. Patients reported robust endorsement for receiving care that involved family and friends, with mean scores of 4.04, and for access to care, with a mean score of 4.40. However, physical comfort, coordination, continuity of care, education and emotional support received comparatively lower rankings.
Conclusion
TB patients with multimorbidity under the ADEPT program experienced PCC. However, certain systemic issues such as physical spaces, coordination, transition of care, and information education did not meet patient’s needs in their own assessment, indicating opportunities for further quality improvement. Scaling up the ADEPT program within healthcare systems is likely to enhance care provision for TB patients with multimorbidity through a patient-centered approach.
Q3

Psychiatric Care Setting from the Perspective of Psychiatric Nursing Managers
Vieira L.C., Bocchi S.C., MacPhee M., Spiri W.C.
Background
Nursing managers are well-positioned to enhance holistic care for patients in psychiatric settings. Managers need to use evidence-based data available to them when making nurse staffing decisions. Patient classification systems can be an excellent source of patients’ priority care needs.
Objective
To understand the meaning of using patient classification systems as a management tool for psychiatric nursing managers.
Methods
Qualitative study with a content analysis methodological framework. Ten nursing managers from psychiatric institutions in the state of São Paulo participated. Data were collected between August 2016 and May 2017 using a semi-structured interview with recorded audio.
Results
The sample consisted of nine women and one man with an average of 14 years’ experience in mental health and seven years of management experience. The psychiatric care setting emerged as a general theme surrounded by four subthemes: current model of decision making, ideal model of decision making, nursing staff dimensioning/staffing, and professional and mental health legislation. Only half of the managers used a patient classification system as a management tool, and there were difficulties associated with their use of the tool.
Conclusion
A conceptual model was developed based on the themes, subthemes, categories, and sub-categories in this study. The model demonstrates major differences between psychiatric settings with biomedical models versus psychosocial models. Managers with knowledge of PCS data can better advocate for patients’ holistic needs and adequate nursing resource allocation. Managers may lack the knowledge and skills required for model transformation, and continuing management/leadership education is recommended.
Q3

The Development of a Cultural-based Questionnaire for Drug Use Prevention Programs for Adolescents: A Delphi Study
Tahlil T., Hadi N., Maulina, Marlina
Objective
This study aimed to identify a valid and cultural-based questionnaire for drug use prevention programs for adolescents.
Methods
The study used a three-round Delphi technique. A total of 21 participants with knowledge and experiences in community nursing (11 nurses) and education for junior high school students (11 teachers) in Aceh Province, Indonesia, were included. For the first round, focus group discussions were conducted. For the second round, participants were asked to indicate their levels of agreement and provide their comments on the proposed questionnaire. For the third round, participants were instructed to indicate their level of agreement with the final version of the developed questionnaire. The consensus was defined based on the percent agreement.
Results
Initially, 64 questions for four domains (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 29 items, intention = 9 items, behaviors = 12 items) were developed based on the FGDs and literature review. Finally, the four domains and 43 questions (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 12 items, intention = 9 items, behaviours = 8 items) were supported by the group panels as the final instrument for the evaluation of drug use prevention programs for adolescents in schools.
Conclusion
Expert panels validated the content of the questionnaire for the drug use prevention programs in Indonesia. Nonetheless, further analysis and implementation of the instrument are required to identify the accuracy of the instrument.
Q3

Understanding the Relationship Between Care Quality Perception and Patient Safety Culture
Janghorban A., Moghri J., Ghavami V., Raesi R., Tabatabaee S.S.
Background
Assessing the perceived quality of care and safety culture by nurses is an important part of nursing practice and is vital for improving the quality of nursing care.
Aim
This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified and convenience sampling techniques from March 2023 to January 2024 among 412 nurses working in hospitals at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The data collection tools were standard care behavior questionnaires (CBI-42) and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests at a significance level of 0.05.
Results
The perceived quality of care among nurses was high, with a score of 4.79 (1-6). The highest score was in “knowledge and professional skill” (5.03), while “communication and positive attitude” scored the lowest (4.59). Patient safety culture averaged 3.35 (1-5), with “overall perception of patient safety” at 4.82 and “non-punitive response to error” at 2.40. A significant direct relationship was found between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture (r=0.226, p<0.001), indicating that improvements in one may enhance the other.
Conclusion
Due to the existence of a direct relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture, appropriate training and using the experiences of others, improving the relationship between nurses and patients, creating a sense of security in nurses, and solving the problems of nurses can enhance the quality of health care services.
Q3

Adherence to Radiation Protection Principles in the Clinical Environment among Anesthesia and Operating Room Nursing Students: Implications for Educational Interventions
Ghasemi S., Khosravi H., Imani B., Shabani N.
Background
The increasing use of ionizing radiation in clinical environments, particularly during surgeries such as orthopedics and neurosurgery, has heightened concerns about the potential health risks associated with this type of radiation. This issue is particularly relevant for nursing students undergoing training in operating room settings, where they are frequently exposed to various sources of radiation. To effectively implement radiation protection principles, it is crucial to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of the students toward ionizing radiation. Understanding their level of awareness and beliefs about radiation safety will inform the development of targeted training programs aimed at minimizing exposure and enhancing safety in clinical environments.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of 8th-semester undergraduate anesthesia and operating room nursing students toward radiation protection principles.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. In this study, students were selected via the census sampling method. The data related to the study were collected from valid questionnaires concerning the participants’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance toward ionizing radiation. The data analysis was also conducted at the descriptive and inferential statistics level via SPSS version 16 software.
Results
The knowledge, attitudes, and performance of the students in both fields were inadequate compared to the ideal standards. Additionally, the mean attitude score toward protective principles was significantly greater among operating room nursing students than anesthesia nursing students (p-value = 0.023). Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation was found between students' Grade Point Average (GPA) and their scores on knowledge and attitudes toward protective principles (r = 0.449, p-value = 0.000 and r = 0.648, p-value = 0.000, respectively).
Conclusion
This study revealed that the level of knowledge among students regarding ionizing radiation is lower than the desired standards for ensuring safety in clinical environments. As a result, it is essential to implement targeted training courses to enhance students' understanding of the risks associated with ionizing radiation.
Q3

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence, Caring Efficacy, and Social Support on Clinical Competency of Nursing Students
Park J., Rajaguru V., Kim J.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of emotional intelligence, caring efficacy, and social support on the clinical competency of Korean nursing students.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive correlational study from 5th March to 10th June 10, 2020, among 257 nursing students in 3rd and 4th years who participated in clinical practice at four universities in two cities. We collected the data using a self-structured questionnaire that included 129 items from the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), the General Self-efficacy (GSE) scale, and scales on social support and clinical competency. We analyzed the data using frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Results
The majority of the students, i.e., 80.2%, were female, 57.6% were in their 3rd year, and the students’ average age ranged from 22.91 to 4.75. The participants’ clinical competency was linked to their emotional intelligence (r =.457; p<.001), their ability to care for others (r =.516; p<.001), and their social support (r =.515; p^.001). There was a statistically significant difference in clinical competency based on the participants’ religion, academic performance, and satisfaction with their major and clinical practice. Factors, such as care efficacy, social support, emotional intelligence, religion, and significant satisfaction, influenced clinical competency.
Conclusion
Overall, 39.3% of the participants demonstrated clinical competency. The results have highlighted the need for the development of an effective educational program that can enhance emotional intelligence, care efficacy, social support, and major satisfaction, thereby promoting the clinical competency of nursing students.
Q3

Communication Methods Used with Conscious Intubated Patients: Scoping Review
Karmakar M., Panduragan S.L., Said F.M.
Background
Intubated conscious patients often experience communication difficulties. The present narrative review outlines the current evidence on communication methods adopted and the experience of conscious intubated patients in critical care areas.
Objectives
To our knowledge, studies have attempted to examine communication with conscious intubated patients. The present review had two objectives: (1) to identify the methods adopted by nurses and conscious intubated patients to ease the communication difficulties faced due to intubation and (2) to identify the experience of nurses and conscious intubated patients with the adopted communication methods.
Methods
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed throughout this review. PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched with the terms “intubated conscious patients,” “communication,” and “nurse”, including original research articles published between January 2019 and May 2024 on conscious patients needing intubation. Dissertations, review papers, non-interventional research, and articles written in languages other than English were excluded. Only eight of the original 2,041 studies, which included 137 intubated patients and for 545 nurses, met the inclusion criteria. The authors used the Mixed Method Appraisal tool (MMAT) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) to collect data and assess quality.
Results
After the first search of generated 2041 papers, only eight articles—representing various studies—were able to meet the inclusion requirements. The included studies were six (6) quantitative, one (1) qualitative study and one (1) mixed-method study. Four communication intervention types were identified, namely: (1) Communication boards/charts (two studies), which improved communication and increased patient satisfaction. (2) Gestures and facial expressions (four studies) were reported to be frequently initiated for communication by the nurses with the patients. (3) Multiple methods (three studies) used were found to be insufficient to communicate with the patients. (4) Digital technology program, including Communicative Digital Technology Program was found to be effective means of communication in three such studies.
Conclusion
Results imply that communication techniques may be useful in enhancing patient–nursing professional communication with conscious intubated patients. However, in developing countries with fewer resources, a low-cost communication tool addressing both physical and emotional needs may be developed to aid in communication among patients and nurses.
Q3

A Case Report on Placenta Accreta: Developing a Conceptual Framework
Alzboon G., Kawafha M., Al Maghaireh D., Alhamory S.
Introduction
Placenta accreta is a pathological condition of the placenta associated with multiple maternal and neonatal complications, but its diagnosis and treatment have been sparsely reported from the nursing viewpoint. This report describes a case of placenta accreta from the nursing perspective to develop a conceptual framework of care.
Case Presentation
Our case involved a 37-year-old pregnant woman with four previous caesarean sections and a previous in vitro fertilisation. She was diagnosed with placenta accreta only in the operating theatre during a scheduled caesarean section, and she had not performed thorough antenatal care as in her previous pregnancies despite having significant symptoms, such as severe urinary incontinence. The patient experienced many complications during the caesarean section, including bladder injury, massive haemorrhage, and hysterectomy.
Conclusion
We develop a theoretical framework illustrating the core factors that influence the management of placenta accreta and associated maternal morbidities. This model highlights the distinction between patient characteristics, nurse characteristics, organisational factors, and pregnancy outcomes and shows their relationship to the diagnosis and prevention of placenta accreta. The model has important implications for research and practice, and the case reminds nurses of their recommended interventions to diagnose, manage, and prevent placenta accreta. The quality of care for placenta accreta cases should be promoted through the assessment of patients, nurses, and organisational factors and the application of prevention measures.
Q3

Development of Community Participation Program on Knowledge and Health Prevention Behaviors Related to Hypertension among Hill Tribe Older Adults in Northern Thailand
Panya P., Yaemmisri W., Viriyaratanakul B., Praison P., Gantagad T., Sareeso P., Guntapan N., Nuansaard I.
Background
The Akha hill tribe of older adults in Thailand, a culturally diverse minority, faces health disparities. Due to limited access to health information and services, those who are unable to read Thai are at a higher risk of developing hypertension. Consequently, hill tribe communities need community engagement to enhance healthcare access and communication between health workers and the community.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a community participation program on hypertension knowledge and health prevention behaviors among Akha older adults in Thailand.
Methods
This program was developed based on evidence and insights from community scholars and stakeholders. The program included three activities: 1] training the volunteers, 2] home visits by trained adolescent and adult volunteers, and 3] providing hypertension knowledge through village broadcasts. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted using an Akha-specific hypertension knowledge and prevention behaviors questionnaire.
Results
Among the thirty healthy Akha older adults who could not communicate in Thai, following the implementation of the community participation program, there was a significant increase in hypertension knowledge (P = 0.000) and HT prevention behaviors (P = 0.017).
Conclusion
The community participation program could improve hypertension knowledge and hypertension prevention behaviors of older adults in the Akha hill tribe by bridging the gap between the healthcare system and the community.
Q3

Role of the Nursing Professional in Euthanasia: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Avila M.I., Díaz Chavarro B.C., Campo A.P., Vargas Murillo S.M.
Background
Until the date of the search, Euthanasia was legally accepted in 5 countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada and Colombia.
Objective
We aimed to identify the role of nurses in euthanasia based on articles published both nationally and internationally between 2014 and 2022.
Methods
Qualitative and quantitative studies, editorials, literature reviews and Colombian regulations were included. Publications that did not meet the criteria of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement and the Spanish Critical Appraisal Skills Programme were excluded. In total, 57 articles were evaluated and 19 were selected. Appropriate copyright principles were followed in accordance with Colombian Law 23 of 1982.
Results
With the data obtained, 4 thematic categories were developed as follows: reception and management of euthanasia requests and regulations in Colombia; emotional accompaniment and effective communication with the patient and family; participation in euthanasia preparations and administration of medications; and management of requests and administration of medications.
Conclusion
Nursing plays an important role in the care of the patient requesting euthanasia, from the reception and management of the request to the administration of the lethal drugs.
Q3

Perceived Health Risks Associated with Smartphone Use Among Health College Students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia
Qalawa S.A., Ibrahim N.M., Fadlalmola H.A., Elmansy F.M., Elbqry M.G.
Background
Smartphones have evolved into a fusion of traditional personal digital assistants and cellular phones, integrating mobile communication capabilities with features parallel to those of a handheld computer.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the health risks associated with smartphone use and the prevalence and nature of observed health issues among health college students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
Employing a descriptive cross-sectional research design, this study surveyed a convenience sample of 511 health college students at Qassim University. The data collection instrument comprised two sections: Section 1 assessed sociodemographic, academic, and health-related information, while Section 2 evaluated the health risks as perceived by students.
Results
The majority of the participants were women (71%) and were studying nursing (26%). A significant proportion (39.9%) reported blurred vision, while 38.6% indicated a lack of adequate sleep. Notably, no significant association was observed between the health complaints and sociodemographic information. The analysis also revealed no significant relationship between health complaints and smartphone usage patterns.
Conclusion
The findings highlight a critical need for further research to investigate the factors contributing to the effect of smartphone use on the physiological well-being of university students. Such research is essential for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the associated health risks.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
|
Tissue Engineering - Part A.
4313 citations, 3.27%
|
|
Biomaterials
3730 citations, 2.83%
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
3654 citations, 2.77%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2242 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
1785 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
1731 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
1724 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews
1666 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Advanced healthcare materials
1638 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1596 citations, 1.21%
|
|
PLoS ONE
1378 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Tissue Engineering - Part C: Methods
1275 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Stem Cell Research and Therapy
1184 citations, 0.9%
|
|
ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering
1111 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering C
1092 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Stem Cells International
925 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Biofabrication
902 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
859 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Biomedical Materials (Bristol)
851 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
770 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Cells
751 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Polymers
729 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
719 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Biomaterials Science
694 citations, 0.53%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
664 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Materials
662 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
647 citations, 0.49%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
615 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Bioengineering
566 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Stem Cells and Development
542 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
541 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
488 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Regenerative Medicine
485 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Tissue Engineering
468 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Macromolecular Bioscience
453 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
452 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
441 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
438 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Biomacromolecules
429 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Bioactive Materials
425 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
401 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
394 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
376 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
373 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Stem cells translational medicine
369 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Controlled Release
359 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Advanced Materials
350 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
346 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
342 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cell and Tissue Research
340 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cell Transplantation
333 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BioMed Research International
330 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
314 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Endodontics
290 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
287 citations, 0.22%
|
|
RSC Advances
284 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
282 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
282 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cytotherapy
271 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
269 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Journal of Sports Medicine
268 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Carbohydrate Polymers
264 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Materials Today Bio
261 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Journal of Stem Cells
254 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Physiology
253 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Cells Tissues Organs
249 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Bone
248 citations, 0.19%
|
|
ACS Applied Bio Materials
247 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biomedicines
245 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Gels
240 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
230 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
228 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
211 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
205 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Dental Research
203 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cartilage
203 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biomaterials Advances
199 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Molecular Medicine Reports
197 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bioprinting
194 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Lab on a Chip
188 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Biomolecules
187 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
185 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Stem Cells
184 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Molecules
176 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Biotechnology Advances
171 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nanomedicine
171 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Trends in Biotechnology
169 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nanomaterials
168 citations, 0.13%
|
|
npj Regenerative Medicine
167 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Communications
166 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
159 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Connective Tissue Research
159 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Regenerative Therapy
159 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Biotechnology Journal
156 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine
156 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
153 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
153 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Materials and Design
152 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
150 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Archives of Oral Biology
149 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Elsevier
32773 citations, 24.85%
|
|
Wiley
18390 citations, 13.94%
|
|
Springer Nature
17249 citations, 13.08%
|
|
MDPI
9295 citations, 7.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
8439 citations, 6.4%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4278 citations, 3.24%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
4001 citations, 3.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3602 citations, 2.73%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3277 citations, 2.48%
|
|
SAGE
3029 citations, 2.3%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2358 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2280 citations, 1.73%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1786 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1525 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1049 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Oxford University Press
977 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
536 citations, 0.41%
|
|
S. Karger AG
418 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
393 citations, 0.3%
|
|
AIP Publishing
380 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
367 citations, 0.28%
|
|
357 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
337 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
327 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
298 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Physiological Society
267 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
246 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
215 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IntechOpen
214 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Royal Society
211 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
203 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
194 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
183 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Reviews
183 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Japanese Society of Regenerative Medicine
157 citations, 0.12%
|
|
ASME International
155 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
154 citations, 0.12%
|
|
World Scientific
132 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
131 citations, 0.1%
|
|
130 citations, 0.1%
|
|
European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO)
128 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOS Press
121 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Impact Journals
120 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
105 citations, 0.08%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
89 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Higher Education Press
80 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SciELO
78 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Portland Press
75 citations, 0.06%
|
|
PeerJ
74 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
74 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Polymer Society of Korea
72 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
72 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
70 citations, 0.05%
|
|
BMJ
69 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
63 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
61 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
59 citations, 0.04%
|
|
55 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
55 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
53 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IGI Global
52 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering
46 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
46 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
46 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bioscientifica
45 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
42 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
42 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
41 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
39 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
37 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
36 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
35 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
35 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
34 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
34 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
33 citations, 0.03%
|
|
V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
33 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Association for Oral Biology
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
XMLink
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
28 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
28 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
28 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Academy of Periodontology
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
25 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SLACK
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
Stanford University
86 publications, 2.46%
|
|
Harvard University
82 publications, 2.35%
|
|
Seoul National University
68 publications, 1.95%
|
|
University of Michigan
62 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Kyoto University
58 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
57 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Toronto
56 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
55 publications, 1.58%
|
|
National University of Singapore
53 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
52 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
51 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Columbia University
49 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
49 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
46 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
46 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
46 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Wake Forest University
46 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Twente
44 publications, 1.26%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
44 publications, 1.26%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
43 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
40 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Cornell University
39 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of California, Davis
39 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
37 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Tufts University
37 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering
37 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
36 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Hanyang University
36 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
33 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Sichuan University
30 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
29 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Utrecht University
29 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Brown University
29 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
28 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
28 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
28 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
27 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
26 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Osaka University
25 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Air Force Medical University
24 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
24 publications, 0.69%
|
|
McGill University
24 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Minnesota
24 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
24 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Zhejiang University
23 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University College London
23 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Hannover Medical School
23 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Tokyo
23 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Université Laval
23 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Yale University
22 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Duke University
22 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
22 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Tokyo Women's Medical University
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Ajou University
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Northwestern University
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Virginia Tech
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Ohio State University
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
21 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Imperial College London
20 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Taiwan University
20 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
20 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
20 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University Hospital of Basel
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tohoku University
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tulane University
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
19 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
18 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Southern Medical University
18 publications, 0.52%
|
|
North Carolina State University
18 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
18 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Tübingen
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Peking University
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Yonsei University
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Korea Institute of Science and Technology
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Paris Cité University
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Delaware
17 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Zurich
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Korea University
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Washington
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
16 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Heidelberg University
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
ETH Zurich
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Southern California
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Clemson University
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
People's Liberation Army General Hospital and Medical School (301 Hospital)
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
15 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
14 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
14 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Stanford University
16 publications, 3.02%
|
|
University of Michigan
16 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Kyoto University
15 publications, 2.83%
|
|
Cornell University
13 publications, 2.45%
|
|
University of Tübingen
12 publications, 2.26%
|
|
Hanyang University
12 publications, 2.26%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
10 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Southern Medical University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Harvard University
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
9 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
8 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Sichuan University
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Peking University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Maastricht University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Tufts University
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
6 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Twente
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Tokyo Women's Medical University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Seoul National University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Lehigh University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Wake Forest University
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Utah
5 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Tsinghua University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Malaya
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Capital Medical University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Colorado State University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Washington
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tulane University
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Alberta
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
4 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Fudan University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Tongji University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
International Islamic University Malaysia
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Heidelberg University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Zurich
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Taiwan University Hospital
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
North Carolina State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Keio University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brown University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Emory University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Shinshu University
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Connecticut
3 publications, 0.57%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Nanjing Medical University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Wuhan University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Nankai University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Jinan University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1631, 46.71%
USA
1631 publications, 46.71%
|
China
|
China, 458, 13.12%
China
458 publications, 13.12%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 270, 7.73%
Germany
270 publications, 7.73%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 240, 6.87%
Japan
240 publications, 6.87%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 220, 6.3%
Netherlands
220 publications, 6.3%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 212, 6.07%
Republic of Korea
212 publications, 6.07%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 158, 4.52%
Canada
158 publications, 4.52%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 152, 4.35%
United Kingdom
152 publications, 4.35%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 98, 2.81%
Italy
98 publications, 2.81%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 90, 2.58%
Switzerland
90 publications, 2.58%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 82, 2.35%
Australia
82 publications, 2.35%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 72, 2.06%
Singapore
72 publications, 2.06%
|
France
|
France, 67, 1.92%
France
67 publications, 1.92%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 57, 1.63%
Ireland
57 publications, 1.63%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 55, 1.58%
Spain
55 publications, 1.58%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 48, 1.37%
Portugal
48 publications, 1.37%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 40, 1.15%
Israel
40 publications, 1.15%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 36, 1.03%
Sweden
36 publications, 1.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 33, 0.95%
Brazil
33 publications, 0.95%
|
India
|
India, 33, 0.95%
India
33 publications, 0.95%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 32, 0.92%
Austria
32 publications, 0.92%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 32, 0.92%
Belgium
32 publications, 0.92%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 21, 0.6%
Finland
21 publications, 0.6%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 18, 0.52%
Iran
18 publications, 0.52%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 0.43%
Malaysia
15 publications, 0.43%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 13, 0.37%
Norway
13 publications, 0.37%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 12, 0.34%
Thailand
12 publications, 0.34%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 10, 0.29%
Denmark
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 10, 0.29%
Egypt
10 publications, 0.29%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 10, 0.29%
New Zealand
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 10, 0.29%
Saudi Arabia
10 publications, 0.29%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 0.26%
Turkey
9 publications, 0.26%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 7, 0.2%
Hungary
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 0.2%
Poland
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 6, 0.17%
Russia
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 6, 0.17%
Czech Republic
6 publications, 0.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.17%
South Africa
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.14%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.11%
Greece
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.11%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.11%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.09%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.09%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.09%
UAE
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.09%
Chile
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.06%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.06%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.06%
Romania
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.06%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.06%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.03%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.03%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.03%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.03%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.03%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.03%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.03%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.03%
Panama
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Saint Kitts and Nevis
|
Saint Kitts and Nevis, 1, 0.03%
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.03%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.03%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (30 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 251, 47.36%
USA
251 publications, 47.36%
|
China
|
China, 93, 17.55%
China
93 publications, 17.55%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 47, 8.87%
Japan
47 publications, 8.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 34, 6.42%
Germany
34 publications, 6.42%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 30, 5.66%
Netherlands
30 publications, 5.66%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 24, 4.53%
Republic of Korea
24 publications, 4.53%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 15, 2.83%
Canada
15 publications, 2.83%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 11, 2.08%
Australia
11 publications, 2.08%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 1.89%
United Kingdom
10 publications, 1.89%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 1.7%
Switzerland
9 publications, 1.7%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 1.32%
Iran
7 publications, 1.32%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 1.32%
Malaysia
7 publications, 1.32%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 1.13%
Brazil
6 publications, 1.13%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 1.13%
Singapore
6 publications, 1.13%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.94%
France
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.94%
Austria
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.94%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 0.94%
Spain
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.94%
Italy
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.94%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.94%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.57%
Russia
3 publications, 0.57%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.57%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.57%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.57%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.57%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.57%
India
3 publications, 0.57%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.57%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.57%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.57%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.57%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.38%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.38%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.19%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.19%
Greece
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.19%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.19%
Israel
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.19%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.19%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.19%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.19%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.19%
Norway
1 publication, 0.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.19%
UAE
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.19%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.19%
Panama
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.19%
Poland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.19%
Romania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.19%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.19%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.19%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.19%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Show all (16 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
2 profile journal articles
Schaer Thomas
🤝 🥼
University of Pennsylvania
95 publications,
2 644 citations
h-index: 27
2 profile journal articles
Bursac Nenad

Duke University
142 publications,
8 785 citations
h-index: 49
1 profile journal article
Timashev Petr
DSc in Chemistry

Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»

Lomonosov Moscow State University
490 publications,
6 781 citations
h-index: 40
1 profile journal article
Efremov Yuri
🤝
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
89 publications,
1 763 citations
h-index: 22
Research interests
Atomic force microscopy
Biomechanics of cells and tissues
Biophysics
1 profile journal article
Akopova Tatiana

Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences
81 publications,
937 citations
h-index: 17
1 profile journal article
Senatov Fedor

National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
89 publications,
2 522 citations
h-index: 23
1 profile journal article
Koudan Elizaveta
DSc in Biological/biomedical sciences

National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
47 publications,
715 citations
h-index: 14
Research interests
Cell biology
Regenerative medicine
Tissue Engineering
1 profile journal article
Kulebyakin Konstantin

Lomonosov Moscow State University
37 publications,
519 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Kenny Jose Maria

University of Perugia
626 publications,
36 242 citations
h-index: 100
1 profile journal article
Layrolle Pierre
🥼 🤝
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
173 publications,
13 751 citations
h-index: 65
1 profile journal article
Bram Van
146 publications,
5 059 citations
h-index: 34
1 profile journal article
Yamaza Takayoshi
112 publications,
7 969 citations
h-index: 41