Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Information Storage and Retrieval
Top-3 citing journals

Information Processing and Management
(328 citations)

Journal of the American Society for Information Science
(202 citations)

Journal of Documentation
(177 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Los Angeles
(10 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(7 publications)

University of Alberta
(6 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 53

A numerical study of design and off-design operations of SHM1 airfoil
Sengupta A., Guha A.
Natural laminar flow airfoils are essential technologies designed to reduce drag and significantly enhance aerodynamic performance. A notable example is the SHM1 airfoil, created to meet the requirements of the small-business jet by Honda R&D. This airfoil has undergone extensive testing across various operational conditions, including low-speed wind tunnel tests and flight tests across a range of Reynolds numbers and free-stream Mach numbers. Additionally, investigations into drag-divergence behavior have been conducted using a transonic wind tunnel, with subsequent studies focusing on transonic shock boundary layer interactions through both experimental and numerical approaches. This study employs a series of numerical simulations to analyze the flow physics and aerodynamic performance across different free-stream Mach numbers in the subsonic and transonic regimes. The analysis offers a comprehensive overview of the aerodynamic performance by making use of instantaneous and time-averaged load and pressure distributions, highlighting the different flow structures (trailing edge vortices, Kutta waves, shock waves - both normal and oblique) and associated time scales in the unsteady flow field and how these impact the performance and extent of separated flow on the SHM1 airfoil. This is achieved by examining computed instantaneous numerical Schlieren for various design conditions (such as low speed, climb, and cruise) and off-design scenarios (including transonic shock emergence, drag-divergence, and shock-induced separation). The dominant time scales, the time-averaged load distributions and boundary layer parameters are compared to provide a comprehensive overview of the SHM1’s aerodynamics, establishing benchmark results for optimization of various flow separation and shock control techniques.

Competency self-assessment for a learning-based autonomous aircraft system
Conlon N., Acharya A., McGinley J., Slack T., Hirst C.A., D’Alonzo M., Hebert M.R., Reale C., Frew E.W., Russell R., Ahmed N.R.
IntroductionFuture concepts for airborne autonomy point toward human operators moving out of the cockpit and into supervisory roles. Urban air mobility, airborne package delivery, and military intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) are all actively exploring such concepts or currently undergoing this transition. Supervisors of these systems will be faced with many challenges, including platforms that operate outside of visual range and the need to decipher complex sensor or telemetry data in order to make informed and safe decisions with respect to the platforms and their mission. A central challenge to this new paradigm of non-co-located mission supervision is developing systems which have explainable and trustworthy autonomy and internal decision-making processes.MethodsCompetency self-assessments are methods that use introspection to quantify and communicate important information pertaining to autonomous system capabilities and limitations to human supervisors. We first discuss a computational framework for competency self-assessment: factorized machine self-confidence (FaMSeC). Within this framework, we then define the generalized outcome assessment (GOA) factor, which quantifies an autonomous system’s ability to meet or exceed user-specified mission outcomes. As a relevant example, we develop a competency-aware learning-based autonomous uncrewed aircraft system (UAS) and evaluate it within a multi-target ISR mission.ResultsWe present an analysis of the computational cost and performance of GOA-based competency reporting. Our results show that our competency self-assessment method can capture changes in the ability of the UAS to achieve mission critical outcomes, and we discuss how this information can be easily communicated to human partners to inform decision-making.DiscussionWe argue that competency self-assessment can enable AI/ML transparency and provide assurances that calibrate human operators with their autonomous teammate’s ability to meet mission goals. This in turn can lead to informed decision-making, appropriate trust in autonomy, and overall improvements to mission performance.

ML meets aerospace: challenges of certifying airborne AI
Luettig B., Akhiat Y., Daw Z.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies can potentially revolutionize the aerospace industry with applications such as remote sensing data refinement, autonomous landing, and drone-based agriculture. However, safety concerns have prevented the widespread adoption of AI in commercial aviation. Currently, commercial aircraft do not incorporate AI components, even in entertainment or ground systems. This paper explores the intersection of AI and aerospace, focusing on the challenges of certifying AI for airborne use, which may require a new certification approach. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify common AI-enabled aerospace applications, classifying them by the criticality of the application and the complexity of the AI method. An applicability analysis was conducted to assess how existing aerospace standards - for system safety, software, and hardware - apply to machine learning technologies. In addition, we conducted a gap analysis of machine learning development methodologies to meet the stringent aspects of aviation certification. We evaluate current efforts in AI certification by applying the EASA concept paper and Overarching Properties (OPs) to a case study of an automated peripheral detection system (ADIMA). Aerospace applications are expected to use a range of methods tailored to different levels of criticality. Current aerospace standards are not directly applicable due to the manner in which the behavior is specified by the data, the uncertainty of the models, and the limitations of white box verification. From a machine learning perspective, open research questions were identified that address validation of intent and data-driven requirements, sufficiency of verification, uncertainty quantification, generalization, and mitigation of unintended behavior. For the ADIMA system, we demonstrated compliance with EASA development processes and achieved key certification objectives. However, many of the objectives are not applicable due to the human-centric design. OPs helped us to identify and uncover several defeaters in the applied ML technology. The results highlight the need for updated certification standards that take into account the unique nature of AI and its failure types. Furthermore, certification processes need to support the continuous evolution of AI technologies. Key challenges remain in ensuring the safety and reliability of AI systems, which calls for new methodologies in the machine learning community.

Balancing predictability and flexibility through operation volume-constrained visual flight rule operations in low altitude airspaces
Andreeva-Mori A.
The advancement in uncrewed aircraft systems such as small drones and advanced air mobility vehicles such as Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing aircraft (eVTOL) has called for airspace integration at low altitudes of both traditional aircraft, such as helicopters and new entrants, such as drones and eVTOL. Currently, the trajectories and necessary buffers around them of flights operating under visual flight rules are not possible to predict. This research proposes the use of flight mission characteristics to model the trajectory and evaluates temporal, lateral and vertical deviations to define the safety buffers which can be used to generate operation volumes, geo-fencing such low-altitude flights and separating them from other traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Real flight test data obtained for the purposes of this study and pilots’ interviews assure high fidelity and practicability of the proposal.

Grand challenges in aerospace engineering
Agarwal R.K.

Model-based manoeuvre analysis: a path to a new paradigm in aircraft flight dynamics
Shayak B., Girdhar S., Malviya S.
We propose a closed-form system of nonlinear equations for the pitch plane or longitudinal motions of a fixed-wing aircraft and use it to demonstrate a possible path to the unification of theoretical flight dynamics and practical analysis of aircraft manoeuvres. The derivation of an explicit model free of data tables and interpolated functions is enabled by our use of empirical formulae for lift and drag which agree with experiments. We validate the model by recovering the well-known short period and phugoid modes, and the regions of normal and reversed command. We then use the model to present detailed simulations of two acrobatic manoeuvres, an Immelmann turn and a vertical dive. Providing new quantitative insights into the dynamics of aviation, our model-based manoeuvre analysis has the potential to impact both the academic flight dynamics curriculum and the ground training program for pilots of manned and unmanned aircraft. Possible consequences of future model-centric pilot training may include improved safety standards in general and commercial aviation as well as expedited theoretical course completion in air transport.

Air traffic inefficiencies and predictability evaluation using route mapping—the Tokyo International Airport case
Andreeva-Mori A.
Air traffic inefficiencies lead to excess fuel burn, emissions and air traffic controller (ATCo) workload. Various stakeholders have developed metrics to assess the operation performance. Most metrics compare the actual trajectories to some benchmark ones to calculate excess time or distance. This research is inspired by cellular automata (CA) and develops a combined time-distance lateral inefficiency and predictability metric using discrete space and time mapping on published flight routes. The analysis is focused on Tokyo International Airport, but uses only track data and published routes, which makes it easily applicable to any other hub airport worldwide. The mapping and velocity analyses are used to investigate when and where ATCos are most likely to intervene to provide save separation. A metric which can be adjusted to evaluate both traffic flow predictability and efficiency is proposed. This metric can be applied to better understand current traffic and enable future improvements towards seamless air traffic flow management.

NOx formation processes in rotating detonation engines
Van Beck C., Raman V.
High-fidelity simulations of RDEs with H2-Air-NOx chemistry are employed to study NOx emissions in such devices. Discrete injection of gaseous hydrogen fuel and continuous injection of air oxidizer is used at various mass flow rate conditions in several 3D RDE simulations to understand resulting NOx production behaviors. Simulations are also performed for two different injector configurations, one in which air is injected axially into the detonation chamber [Axial Air Inlet (AAI)] and one in which air is injected radially [Radial Air Inlet (RAI)]. It is seen that the AAI RDE produces much less NOx than the RAI RDE, mainly due to the weaker waves seen in this system as a result of parasitic combustion losses from product gas recirculation. Parasitic combustion does lead to NOx formation in its own right, but the emissions levels from this process are negligible compared to emissions stemming directly from detonation processes. In regards to detonation strength in particular, it is generally seen that detonation strength increases with increasing mass flow rate, in turn increasing peak pressure, peak heat release and NOx emissions levels. Nevertheless, even the highest recorded NOx levels at the combustor exit in this study remain on the same order of magnitude as compared to gas turbine exhaust emissions levels, supporting the claim that significant differences between detonative and deflagrative combustion do not necessarily lead to significant differences in NOx levels. Overall, this study provides greater understanding into the behaviors of NOx formation in RDEs and how these behaviors are affected by changes in operating parameters.

Overtaking collision avoidance for small autonomous uncrewed aircraft using geometric keep-out zones
Hawes N.C., Wilhelm J.P.
Autonomous uncrewed aircraft will require collision avoidance systems (CASs) designed with autonomy in mind as they integrate into the increasingly crowded national airspace system. Current uncrewed aircraft CASs typically require a remote pilot to execute avoidance or to provide poorly defined guidance that does not benefit autonomous systems. The Path Recovery Automated Collision Avoidance System (PRACAS) re-plans flight paths to autonomously adjust for collisions using path planners and keep-out zones (KOZs), but it does not currently detect or mitigate overtaking collisions. This work investigates the effect of geometric KOZs on overtaking scenarios for autonomous uncrewed aircraft. KOZ shapes were developed by relating relative velocities and turn rates of aircraft in overtaking scenarios and were tested using PRACAS. The operational ranges for approach heading, relative velocity, and look-ahead time were then determined. The set of KOZs that were developed prevented intruder aircraft from entering the minimum separation distance of one wingspan from the mission aircraft in overtaking scenarios with look-ahead times between 5 and 12 s, relative velocities of 2–20, and approach angles between 110° and −110° measured from the heading of the main UAS. Minimum separation was maintained for low-speed encounters with relative velocities between 1.1 and 2.0 for look-ahead times between 2 and 8 s for all approach angles. With look-ahead times ranging from 5 to 8 s, overtaking collisions of all tested approach angles and relative speeds are handled with more than twice the separation required for success, showing that the KOZs developed are feasible in possible autonomous CASs.
Trajectory generation based on power for urban air mobility
Paielli R.A.
A method of generating trajectories based on power is proposed for Urban Air Taxis. The method is simpler and more direct than traditional methods because it does not require a detailed aircraft model or a flight control model. Instead, it allows the user to specify the route, the static longitudinal profile (altitude as a function of distance), and a power model to determine the progress in time along that profile. The power model can be determined from a recorded or simulated trajectory of the same aircraft type. This capability allows a trajectory to be generated or reshaped to avoid conflicts while preserving the basic performance characteristics. Net or excess power is defined as the rate of change of mechanical (kinetic and potential) energy, and it is modeled as a function of airspeed. The time steps between discrete points in space along the trajectory are used to yield a specified power as a function of airspeed, and they are determined by solving a cubic polynomial at each point. An elliptical profile is used to generate an example trajectory. The dependence of trip flight time on various parameters is analyzed and plotted.
Comparison and synthesis of two aerospace case studies to develop human-autonomy teaming requirements
Tokadlı G., Dorneich M.C.
This paper developed human-autonomy teaming (HAT) characteristics and requirements by comparing and synthesizing two aerospace case studies (Single Pilot Operations/Reduced Crew Operations and Long-Distance Human Space Operations) and the related recent HAT empirical studies. Advances in sensors, machine learning, and machine reasoning have enabled increasingly autonomous system technology to work more closely with human(s), often with decreasing human direction. As increasingly autonomous systems become more capable, their interactions with humans may evolve into a teaming relationship. However, humans and autonomous systems have asymmetric teaming capabilities, which introduces challenges when designing a teaming interaction paradigm in HAT. Additionally, developing requirements for HAT can be challenging for future operations concepts, which are not yet well-defined. Two case studies conducted previously document analysis of past literature and interviews with subject matter experts to develop domain knowledge models and requirements for future operations. Prototype delegation interfaces were developed to perform summative evaluation studies for the case studies. In this paper, a review of recent literature on HAT empirical studies was conducted to augment the document analysis for the case studies. The results of the two case studies and the literature review were compared and synthesized to suggest the common characteristics and requirements for HAT in future aerospace operations. The requirements and characteristics were grouped into categories of team roles, autonomous teammate types, interaction paradigms, and training. For example, human teammates preferred the autonomous teammate to have human-like characteristics (e.g., dialog-based conversation, social skills, and body gestures to provide cue-based information). Even though more work is necessary to verify and validate the requirements for HAT development, the case studies and recent empirical literature enumerate the types of functions and capabilities needed for increasingly autonomous systems to act as a teammate to support future operations.
Platooning in UAM airspace structures: applying trajectory shaping guidance law and exploiting cooperative localization
Mayle M.N., Sharma R.
A novel control technique for the platooning of aerial vehicles is here introduced, and its stability is analyzed. The controller applies a missile guidance law that was initially adapted for path-following and subsequently extended to platooning. The positions of all agents within a platoon employing this controller are estimated by exploiting cooperative localization, and these estimated positions are fed back into the controller. Using simulation, the agents within a platoon are demonstrated to follow their desired path and avoid collision, even in environments with intermittent Global Positioning System signals and limited sensing ranges.
Traffic management protocols for advanced air mobility
Chin C., Qin V., Gopalakrishnan K., Balakrishnan H.
The demand for advanced air mobility (AAM) operations is expected to be at a much larger scale than conventional aviation. Additionally, AAM flight operators are likely to compete in providing a range of on-demand services in congested airspaces, with varying operational costs. These characteristics motivate the need for the development of new traffic management algorithms for advanced air mobility. In this paper, we explore the use of traffic management protocols (“rules-of-the-road” for airspace access) to enable efficient and fair operations. First, we show that it is possible to avoid gridlock and improve efficiency by leveraging the concepts of cycle detection and backpressure. We then develop a cost-aware traffic management protocol based on the second-price auction. Using simulations of representative advanced air mobility scenarios, we demonstrate that our traffic management protocols can help balance efficiency and fairness, in both the operational and the economic contexts.
Interval observers design for systems with ostensible Metzler system matrices
Krokavec D., Filasová A.
This paper attempts to resolve the problem concerning the interval observers design for linear systems with ostensible Metzler system matrices. Because system dynamics matrices are partially different from strictly Metzler structures, a solution is achieved by constructing a composed system matrix representation, which combines pre-compensated interval matrix structures fixed with a prescribed region of D-stability and the reconstructed strictly Metzler matrix structure, related to the original interval system matrix parameter definition. A novel design procedure is presented, which results in a strictly positive observer gain matrix and guarantees that the lower estimates of the positive state variables are non-negative when considering the given system structure and the non-negative system state initial values. The design is computationally simple since it is reduced to the feasibility of the set of linear matrix inequalities.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Information Processing and Management
328 citations, 10.27%
|
|
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
202 citations, 6.32%
|
|
Journal of Documentation
177 citations, 5.54%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
148 citations, 4.63%
|
|
Information Storage and Retrieval
121 citations, 3.79%
|
|
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
92 citations, 2.88%
|
|
Journal of Information Science
78 citations, 2.44%
|
|
ACM SIGIR Forum
41 citations, 1.28%
|
|
Scientometrics
37 citations, 1.16%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
37 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Aslib Proceedings
30 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
24 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Genre Theory in Information Studies
22 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Journal of Informetrics
18 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Information Systems
17 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Communications of the ACM
16 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Library and Information Science Trends and Research: Europe
16 citations, 0.5%
|
|
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
15 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Information Retrieval
13 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services
13 citations, 0.41%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
12 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Program electronic library and information systems
12 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Online Review
12 citations, 0.38%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
11 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
11 citations, 0.34%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
10 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Academic Librarianship
9 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
9 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
8 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Information Sciences
8 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
8 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Methods in Microbiology
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of the ACM
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advances in Computers
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Sustainability
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Methods of Information in Medicine
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Libri
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Online Information Review
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
PLoS ONE
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Angewandte Chemie
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
6 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Cheminformatics
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Web Semantics
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Topic Detection and Tracking
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Acta Informatica
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Chemical Science
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Systems and Software
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Library Hi Tech
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science and Technology Libraries
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Librarianship
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE Access
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the Society of Archivists
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Informatik zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Neurocomputing
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Sciences
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Library Management
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
International Journal on Digital Libraries
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Science
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Computer
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Electronic Library
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Vision
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Molecular Informatics
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Discrete Algorithms
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pattern Recognition
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Knowledge and Information Systems
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Human Factors
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Computing
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Natural Language Engineering
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Decision Support Systems
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
R and D Management
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Information Processing Letters
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Information and Control
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Tetrahedron Computer Methodology
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Library Review
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Semantics of Relationships
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Medical Informatics Europe 1991
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Elsevier
763 citations, 23.88%
|
|
Wiley
426 citations, 13.33%
|
|
Springer Nature
409 citations, 12.8%
|
|
Emerald
343 citations, 10.74%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
281 citations, 8.79%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
141 citations, 4.41%
|
|
SAGE
122 citations, 3.82%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
75 citations, 2.35%
|
|
MDPI
41 citations, 1.28%
|
|
IGI Global
35 citations, 1.1%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
20 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
15 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
15 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Oxford University Press
13 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
12 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
11 citations, 0.34%
|
|
World Scientific
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
7 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Copernicus
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SciELO
5 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
4 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
JMIR Publications
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
3 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
MIT Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Editions Technip
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Science Alert
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Peeters Publishers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Bibliografia e Documentacao. Conselho nacional de pesquisas
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
United Kingdom Serials Group (UKSG)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
ASME International
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Computer Chemistry, Japan
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
State Public Scientific-Technical Library
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information - VINITI RAS
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Engineering Project Organization Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ligue des Bibliotheques Europeennes de Recherche
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
ASTES Journal
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (45 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
10 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
7 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Alberta
6 publications, 1.31%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
4 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Concordia University
3 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Denver
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
United States National Library of Medicine
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National Physical Laboratory
2 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Liège
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
City, University of London
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Catholic University of America
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Colorado State University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Syracuse University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Newcastle University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Lancaster University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
McMaster University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Waterloo
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Lehigh University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Western University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Université Laval
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Kent
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University College Dublin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Unilever
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (31 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 107, 23.41%
USA
107 publications, 23.41%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 29, 6.35%
United Kingdom
29 publications, 6.35%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 14, 3.06%
Canada
14 publications, 3.06%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 13, 2.84%
Czechoslovakia
13 publications, 2.84%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 12, 2.63%
Czech Republic
12 publications, 2.63%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 1.53%
Germany
7 publications, 1.53%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.66%
Poland
3 publications, 0.66%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.66%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.66%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.44%
France
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.44%
Australia
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.44%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.44%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.44%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.44%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.44%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.22%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.22%
Israel
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.22%
Norway
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.22%
Japan
1 publication, 0.22%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|