ACM SIGACT News
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Years of issue
2024
journal names
ACM SIGACT News
Top-3 citing journals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(1665 citations)

Theoretical Computer Science
(320 citations)

Physical Review A
(182 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Maryland, College Park
(162 publications)

University of Rochester
(100 publications)

Minnesota State University Mankato
(73 publications)

University of Maryland, College Park
(22 publications)

Clark University
(18 publications)

Institute of Science and Technology Austria
(15 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4684
Q2

Rhynchophylline promotes microglia phenotypic transformation and repair of cerebral ischaemic injury through the JAK2/STAT3 pathway
Bai P., Li C., Yin L., Li Y., Ju M., Wang L.
Background Rhynchophylline (RIN) is an alkaloid known for its ability to effectively block signal transduction related to various neurodegenerative diseases. However, the specific mechanism by which RIN regulates microglial activation and cerebral ischemia remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the function and molecular pathways through which RIN activates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling cascade, promoting the transformation of microglial phenotypes that contribute to recovery from cerebral ischemic injury. Methods By establishing a microglia oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) model and a middle cerebral artery occlusion animal model, we assessed changes in the expression of phenotype-specific marker factors for M1 and M2 microglia, as well as key proteins in the JAK2/STAT3 pathway, utilizing ELISA and Western blot techniques. Histological examination, including HE staining, TUNEL assay, and immunofluorescence, was employed to evaluate pathological changes in brain tissue, along with cell apoptosis and proliferation. Results The results indicated that microglial activity was significantly reduced and shifted towards the M1 phenotype following OGD/R. However, RIN treatment reversed these changes. When JAK2/STAT3 inhibitors were combined with RIN, it inhibited RIN’s protective effect. Animal studies have shown that RIN reduces histopathological changes associated with cerebral ischemia. Additionally, RIN inhibited microglial proliferation in ischemic cortical tissue and increased the expression of M2-type marker proteins, as well as the levels of phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT3 in the ischemic tissue. Conclusion In conclusion, this study indicates that RIN may protect against cerebral ischemic injury by activating the JAK2/STAT3 pathway, which promotes the transition of microglia to the M2 phenotypic.
Q2

Activation of SIRT3/AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy promotes quercetin-induced ferroptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Wang J., Yang J., Xiong D., Chen L.
Introduction Quercetin has been reported to inhibit the growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but the mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the involvement of sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) and the autophagy-dependent form of cell death, ferroptosis, in the pathogenesis of OSCC, and observe the impacts of quercetin on ferroptosis and SIRT3/AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy. Methods SIRT3 knock out or overexpressing SCC15 cell line was generated, treated with indicated drugs, and malondialdehyde (MDA) and ROS levels were measured. Roles of SIRT3 in regulating autophagy-mediated ferroptosis were assessed by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Results SIRT3 overexpression increased levels of MDA and ROS, reducing cell viability, and SIRT3 knockout produced the opposing effect. SIRT3 overexpression upregulated ATG16L1 expression and the conversion of LC3-Ⅰ to LC3-Ⅱ, triggering autophagy. Suppression of autophagy by ATG16L1 knockout impaired SIRT3-triggered ferroptosis. Use of an AMPK inhibitor antagonized the induction of ferroptosis by SIRT3 in SCC15 cells, indicating the involvement of the AMPK/mTOR pathway. Additionally, quercetin significantly increased the levels of SIRT3, p-AMPK, ATG16L1, and the ratio of LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ, but reduced cell viability and p-mTOR in SCC15 cells. Autophagy and AMPK inhibitors, or SIRT3 deletion significantly antagonized the impacts of quercetin on the autophagy-mediated ferroptosis in cancer cells. Discussion SIRT3 overexpression activated the AMPK/mTOR pathway and triggered ATG16L1-mediated autophagy, promoting ferroptosis in SCC15 cells, and we proposed that quercetin may be a promising therapeutic drug for OSCC.
Q2

The acute and sub-chronic toxicological effects of 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) on zebrafish
Vásárhelyi E., Rácz G., Urbányi B., Szabó B.P., Szepesi-Bencsik D., Szabó I., Bock I., Volner C., Griffitts J.D., Kriszt B., Bakos K., Csenki Z.
Introduction In this study, we sought to determine the sub-chronic toxicological effects of AEC on zebrafish embryos. Methods We utilized fish early life stage (FELS) and fish embryo toxicity (FET) tests, vascular, neurological, and renal transgenic zebrafish lines, and gene expression anal-ysis of the zebrafish tissue. Results In the FET tests, AEC caused several abnormalities in the larvae, with the LC50 at 24 hpf being 4.076 ± 0.221 mg/L and 3.296 ± 0.127 mg/L at 96 hpf. In the FELS test, AEC was shown to be lethal following 16 days of exposure at 0.5 mg/L, 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L. Some of the transgenic zebrafish lines exhibited slight changes in fluorescent signaling pat-terns after exposure to AEC at 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L. Notable results of the gene expression analysis revealed: gpx4b and got2 were downregulated in the liver; HIF1a was downregulated at 0.25 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L concentrations, NOTCH1a and fli-1 genes were downregulated at all concentrations, and A2b was upregulated in the vasculature; a1T, ngn1, elavl3, syn2a, mbp, gap43 were down-regulated in the nervous system; and wt1b was downregulated in the kidney. Discuccion Altogether, the results of our study indicate the potential for AEC to cause harm to organisms.
Q2

Enhancing breast cancer treatment: Evaluating the efficacy of hyaluronic acid-coated tamoxifen-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles on MCF7 cells
Ghayoumipour N., Ghafouri H.
Introduction Tamoxifen (TMX) shows promise in treating breast cancer, but it faces challenges such as poor solubility, instability, and incomplete release when targeting tumors. Additionally, TMX therapy’s toxicity is a critical issue in breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to assess the impact of hyaluronic acid (HA)-coated TMX-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (HA-TMX-SLNs) on MCF7 breast cancer cells. Methods Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were prepared using hot homogenization. The HA-TMX-SLNs and TMX-SLNs were characterized and evaluated through transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTT assay, and Western blot analysis was utilized to identify key factors in the cell cycle and apoptosis. Results The nanoparticles (HA-TMX-SLNs) demonstrated approximately 55% loading efficiency after 100 h. HA-TMX-SLNs exhibited lower cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells compared to other treatments. Significant decreases in expression levels of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4, Cyclin D1, CDK2, and Bcl2 were observed after treatment with HA-TMX-SLNs, along with an increase in cleaved/procaspase-7. Discussion The in vitro release study showed that HA-coated SLNs consistently released the drug into the media under controlled conditions. Furthermore, HA-TMX-SLNs exhibited cytotoxic effects, increasing apoptosis and inhibiting cancer cell proliferation. These findings suggest that HA-TMX-SLNs effectively deliver TMX to breast cancer cells.
Q2

Conflicts of interest in the International Agency for Research on Cancer process of identifying carcinogenic hazards to humans
Elmore S.A., Berry C., Bolon B., Boorman G.A., Bradley A.E., Cohen S.M., Klaunig J.E., Kluxen F.M., Maronpot R.R., Nyska A., Papenfuss T.L., Rehg J.E., Resnik D.B., Rietjens I.M., Rosol T.J., et. al.
Managing conflicts of interest (COIs) in scientific decision-making is important for minimizing bias and fostering public trust in science. Proper management of COIs has added significance when scientists are making decisions that impact public policy, such as assessing substances for carcinogenicity. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) organizes expert working groups to identify putative carcinogens and determine whether or not the hazard is likely to present significant potential harm to humans. While IARC has policies for managing COIs, prior professional experience with the substance being assessed is not defined as a COI. Indeed, IARC working group members are chosen based on subject matter expertise, including prior publication on the substance under review. However, a person’s prior experience with a substance poses a significant potential COI by equipping them with strong pre-existing views about the substance’s toxicity and carcinogenicity. To minimize the risk of bias in IARC working groups, participants with voting powers should be independent scientific experts with sufficient professional experience to review carcinogenicity data but with no substantial prior experience with the substance under review. A related IARC practice restricting data review by working groups to selected publications is another significant COI. Instead, all accessible data should be available for consideration by working groups in assessing the carcinogenic hazard of substances. Another recommendation to reduce potential bias would be to reinstate the option of “probably not carcinogenic to humans”.
Q2

Thanks to Reviewers
Q2
Human and Experimental Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Ginsenoside Re suppresses high glucose-induced apoptosis of placental trophoblasts through endoplasmic reticulum stress-related CHOP/GADD153
Zeng G., Zou W., Liu C., Chen Y., Wen T.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a metabolic disorder that arises during pregnancy and heightens the risk of placental dysplasia. Ginsenoside Re (Re) may stabilize insulin and glucagon to regulate glucose levels, which may improve diabetes-associated diseases. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the mechanism of Re in high glucose (HG)-induced apoptosis of trophoblasts through endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-related protein CHOP/GADD153. Research Design: Human trophoblast cells HTR-8/SVneo were treated with HG to simulate the HG environment in vitro, while normal glucose (NG) was used as the control. Study Sample: NG (5 mM) or HG (25 mM)-cultured HTR-8/SVneo cells were treated with 10, 20 or 40 μM Re. HG-cultured cells were treated with 5 mM ERS inducer 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) and transfected with oe- CHO. Data Collection and/or Analysis: Cell viability and apoptosis were detected by CCK-8 and flow cytometry; LDH release, superoxide dismutase (SOD), malonaldehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels were detected using kits; the apoptosisrelated proteins and ERS-related proteins were assessed by western blot. Results: Re (10, 20 or 40 μM) had no significant effect on NG-treated HTR-8/SVneo cell viability. Re (20 or 40 μM) could enhance the viability of HG-treated trophoblasts. Re (40 μM) inhibited apoptosis of HGtreated trophoblasts, ERS and alleviated oxidative stress evidenced by suppressed phosphorylation of PERK, IRE1α, reduced protein expression of ATF6, CHOP/GADD153, and inhibited MDA accumulation, GSH and SOD loss. ERS activation or CHOP/GADD153 overexpression reversed Re’s inhibition on HG-induced apoptosis of trophoblasts. Conclusions: Re repressed HG-induced placental trophoblast apoptosis by mediating ERS-related protein CHOP/GADD153.
Q2

Expression of concern
Q2
Human and Experimental Toxicology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Down-regulation of E2F1 attenuates UVB-induced human lens epithelial cell oxidative stress and pyroptosis through inhibiting NLRP3
Wang F., Yang F., Yang G., Zhou Q., Lv H.
Background It is well-known that ultraviolet B (UVB) causes cataracts by inducing pyroptosis and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human lens epithelial cells (HLECs). The transcription factor E2F1 (E2F1) serves as a positive regulator of disrupted pathways involved in histone modification and cell cycle regulation. However, its function in UVB-treated HLECs remains unknown. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the function of E2F1 in UVB-treated HLECs, with a particular focus on its interaction with NLRP3 and its impact on oxidative stress and pyroptosis. Research Design: HLECs were irradiated with UVB, and cell damage was assessed using CCK-8, ROS, and pyroptosis detection. The interaction between E2F1 and NLRP3 was confirmed using Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR and dual-luciferase reporter assays. Study Sample: The study was conducted using UVB-treated HLECs. Data Collection and/or Analysis Collected data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Our results show that HLECs were much more susceptible to oxidative stress, pyroptosis, and E2F1 in response to UVB-irradiation, but that E2F1 down-regulation effectively counteracted these effects. E2F1 was then suggested as a potential NLRP3 transcription factor by bioinformatics studies. At the same time, luciferase and CHIP assays showed that E2F1 could bind to the NLRP3 promoter and enhance NLRP3 transcription. In addition, the protective effects of si-E2F1 against oxidative stress and pyroptosis in HLECs are counteracted by overexpressing NLRP3. Conclusions All of the above provided the possibility to demonstrate that E2F1 plays a crucial role in regulating oxidative stress and pyroptosis in UVB-induced HLECs through inhibiting NLRP3, and it promotes oxidative stress-induced pyroptosis by suppressing NLRP3 expression.
Q2

Corrigendum to “Carvedilol alleviates the detrimental effects of azathioprine on hepatic tissues in experimental rats: Focusing on redox system, inflammatory and apoptosis pathways”
Q2
Human and Experimental Toxicology
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Carvedilol alleviates the detrimental effects of azathioprine on hepatic tissues in experimental rats: Focusing on redox system, inflammatory and apoptosis pathways
Shalkami A.S., El-Shoura E.A., Hassan M.I.
Purpose Drug-induced liver injury is becoming an increasingly important topic in drug research and clinical practice. Due to a lack of experimental animal models, predicting drug-induced liver injury in humans is challenging. Azathioprine (AZA) is a classical immunosuppressant with hepatotoxic adverse effects. The present study aimed to address the hepatoprotective effect of carvedilol (CAR) against AZA-induced hepatocellular injury via assessing redox-sensitive signals. Method To achieve this purpose, rats were allocated into four groups: control, CAR only, AZA only, and CAR plus AZA groups. The induction of hepatic injury was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of AZA at a dose of 50 mg/kg on the 6th day of the experiment. Each experimental protocol was approved and supervised by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments. Results The results of the present study revealed that CAR administration significantly diminished AZA-induced hepatic dysfunction, as evidenced by relief of hepatic function biomarkers and histopathological aberration induced by AZA injection. Besides, CAR restored oxidant/antioxidant balance as well as NRF2 expression. In addition, CAR suppressed inflammatory response induced by AZA challenge as evidenced by downregulation of TLR4, TNF-α, MPO, and eNOS/iNOS levels in hepatic tissue. Moreover, CAR recovered apoptotic/anti-apoptotic status by modulation of caspase-3/Bcl2 expression. Conclusion Taken together, CAR protects against AZA-induced hepatic injury via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic activities. These findings revealed that CAR could be a good candidate for hepatic injury protection and can be added to AZA therapeutic regimen to reduce their adverse effect.
Q2

Ginsenoside Rg5 induces NSCLC cell apoptosis and autophagy through PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway
Zhang C., Jin Y.
Objective Ginsenoside Rg5 (Rg5) is a minor ginsenoside of ginseng and has a strong anti-tumor potential. This study focused on deciphering the function of Rg5 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and investigating its related mechanism. Methods After treating human NSCLC cell lines (H1650 and A549) and bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) with increasing concentration of Rg5, cell viability was examined using methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. NSCLC cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by colony formation assay and flow cytometry, respectively. The levels of proteins associated with cell cycle progression, cell apoptosis, and autophagy as well as the key markers in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway were measured using western blot. A xenograft nude mouse model was established to explore the function of Rg5 in vivo. Results NSCLC cell viability was dose- and time-dependently suppressed after Rg5 treatment. Rg5 restrained NSCLC cell proliferation by inducing G2/M phase arrest via regulation of cell cycle-related genes including p21, cyclin B1, and Cdc2. Additionally, Rg5 promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis in NSCLC cells by regulating the intrinsic mitochondrial signaling pathway. Rg5 induced autophagy via the regulation of autophagy-related proteins. The in vivo experiments revealed the inhibitory impact of Rg5 on xenograft growth. Rg5 also inactivated the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in NSCLC cells and mouse tumors. Conclusion Rg5 induced autophagy and caspase-dependent apoptosis in NSCLC cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, suggesting that Rg5 might become a promising and novel anti-tumor agent for the clinical treatment of NSCLC patients.
Q2

Liver and ovarian toxicities boosted by bisphenol and gamma radiation in female albino rats
Hassan A.A., Abdelgayed S.S., Mansour S.Z.
Bisphenol A (BPA), a carbon-based synthetic polymer compound, was newly classified as an environmental toxicant and an endocrine-disrupting chemical leading to abnormalities in cell proliferation, apoptosis, or migration that contributes to cancer development and progression. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the elevation of γ- radiation dose and BPA on the liver and ovaries of female rats. In this study, eighty female albino rats (130–150 g) were used in this work. Rats in this experiment received BPA in ethanol (50 mg/kg b. wt.) for 30 days, day after day, and in the irradiated groups, animals were administered BPA and then exposed to γ- radiation in doses (2, 4, and 6 Gy) one shot dose. Several members of the cytochrome family were examined. Exposure to γ-radiation and BPA showed an increase in cytochrome P450 and b5 fold change. Further, BPA and γ-radiation activate α and β estrogen receptors and also downregulate aromatase (CYT19) fold change. The current results also revealed that BPA and/or γ-radiation regulate the protein expression of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) appeared to be targeted by BPA and γ-radiation and its relative expression was elevated significantly by raising the γ-radiation dose. In conclusion, exposure to BPA, an endocrine-disrupting chemical, leads to marked toxicity. Additionally, toxicity is heightened by increasing the γ-radiation dose, either alone or in combination with BPA.
Q2

Evaluation of antioxidant properties and cytotoxicity of brown algae (nizamuddinia zanardinii) in uterine (hela) and pancreatic cancer cell lines (paca-2)
Amerifar M., Arabnozari H., Shokrzadeh M., Habibi E.
Introduction Pancreatic cancer and cervical cancer are among the most common cancers. Brown algae have anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-fungal, antioxidant, and immune-boosting properties. This study investigated the antioxidant properties and the effect of brown algae extract on pancreatic and uterine cancer cells. Materials and methods In this study, Cervical (Hela) and pancreas (Paca-2) cancer cell lines were examined. The algae materials were extracted by sequential maceration method and amount of fucoxanthin content in the sample was determined by using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system. The cytotoxic effect of different concentrations of brown algae was measured by the MTT assay. All statistical calculations for comparing IC50 were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism software. Results the algal sample contained an average of 102.52 ± 0.12 μg of fucoxanthin per 100 g. IC50 for 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and hydrogen peroxide free radical scavenging activity for methanolic extract was 2.02 and 11.98 ± 0.13 respectively. Brown algae in all fractions inhibited cell growth and survival. In Hela cell lines, the methanolic extract was the most effective inhibitor, while in Paca cell lines, hexane and methanolic extracts were particularly potent. The methanolic extract was more toxic than other fractions on Hela and Paca cell lines. Conclusion This study highlights brown algae extracts strong anticancer effects on uterine and pancreatic cancer cells, suggesting its potential as a natural anticancer drug. Different fractions of the extract showed superior apoptotic and cytotoxic effects, with higher concentrations leading to increased apoptotic effects and reduced survival rates of cancer cells.
Q2

The effect of melatonin on capecitabine-induced hepatic and renal toxicity in rats
Tavakoli Pirzaman A., Mansoori R., Hosseini S.M., Abolhosseini A., Khosravi S., Moghadamnia A.A., Kazemi S.
Background Capecitabine (CAPE), an antimetabolite chemotherapy, can induce hepatic and renal toxicity. Melatonin (MEL), a neurohormone, possesses antioxidant, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigated the impact of MEL on capecitabine-induced hepatic and renal toxicity. Methods and materials Twenty-five male Wistar rats were categorized into five groups for the study. The groups included a control group, MEL10 group (rats receiving daily intraperitoneal injections of 5 mg/kg MEL), CAPE 500 group (rats receiving weekly intraperitoneal injections of 500 mg/kg CAPE), CAPE + MEL five group, and CAPE + MEL 10 group. All groups were treated for a duration of 6 weeks. Various hematological, serological, biochemical, and histopathological assessments were conducted to evaluate the objective of the study. Results The administration of CAPE led to significant liver and kidney toxicity, as evidenced by elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitric oxide (NO), as well as serological markers including AST, ALT, ALP, BUN, and creatinine. CAPE exposure also resulted in a reduction in total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels. Histological examination revealed hyperemia in both liver and kidney tissues exposed to CAPE. However, treatment with MEL demonstrated positive effects. MEL administration alleviated oxidative stress, reduced levels of liver enzymes, BUN, and creatinine, and ameliorated histopathological degenerations. MEL also increased GPx and TAC levels. Moreover, MEL treatment aided in restoring the body weight that was lost due to CAPE exposure. Conclusion Our findings indicated that the administration of MEL in rats significantly enhanced the hepatic and renal toxicity induced by CAPE.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1665 citations, 15.06%
|
|
Theoretical Computer Science
320 citations, 2.89%
|
|
Physical Review A
182 citations, 1.65%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Computing
151 citations, 1.37%
|
|
ACM SIGACT News
144 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Information Processing Letters
101 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
93 citations, 0.84%
|
|
IEEE Access
92 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Algorithmica
85 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of the ACM
79 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Theory of Computing Systems
77 citations, 0.7%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
76 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Quantum Information Processing
67 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Information and Computation
63 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Discrete Applied Mathematics
63 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
56 citations, 0.51%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
47 citations, 0.43%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Algorithms
47 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
45 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Quantum
44 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Distributed Computing
41 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS
37 citations, 0.33%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
35 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
35 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications
29 citations, 0.26%
|
|
New Journal of Physics
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computers
26 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Communications of the ACM
26 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Computer Networks
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Scientific Reports
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Acta Informatica
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Theoretical Physics
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Entropy
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Future Generation Computer Systems
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Information
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Mathematics
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
npj Quantum Information
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Discrete Mathematics
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Algorithms
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Networks
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Scheduling
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computational Complexity
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Algorithms
15 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Random Structures and Algorithms
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Reviews of Modern Physics
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Physical Review Research
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Semantic Search over the Web
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Operational Research
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Modern Optics
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Automated Reasoning
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SIGMOD Record
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nature
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
PRX Quantum
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
13 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Information Sciences
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Computer Communications
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
PLoS ONE
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Nature Communications
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JETP Letters
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Optics Express
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Physical Review E
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sensors
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Mathematics of Operations Research
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Quantum Science and Technology
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Discrete Algorithms
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
VLDB Journal
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Computing (Vienna/New York)
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Cryptology
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Computer
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Springer Nature
3188 citations, 28.83%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1804 citations, 16.31%
|
|
Elsevier
1506 citations, 13.62%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1173 citations, 10.61%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
318 citations, 2.88%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
194 citations, 1.75%
|
|
Wiley
192 citations, 1.74%
|
|
MDPI
182 citations, 1.65%
|
|
IOP Publishing
137 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
111 citations, 1%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
105 citations, 0.95%
|
|
IGI Global
90 citations, 0.81%
|
|
World Scientific
84 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
46 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
45 citations, 0.41%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
39 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Oxford University Press
38 citations, 0.34%
|
|
EDP Sciences
33 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
SAGE
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
AIP Publishing
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
29 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
26 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
25 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
The Royal Society
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Emerald
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science in China Press
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
ASME International
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MIT Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mathematical Association of America
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Institute of Communications Information Sciences
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Science Alert
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Warwick
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Index Copernicus
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Technischen Universitat Braunschweig
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korea Information Processing Society (KIPS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CAIRN
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Surgical Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Open Publishing Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese College of Surgeons
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
University of Bialystok
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
proceedings - symposium on logic in computer science
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Operations Research Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Crop Science Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Tohoku University Medical Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Slovenska Technika Univerzita
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
The Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear Fusion Research (JSPF)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
162 publications, 8.21%
|
|
University of Rochester
100 publications, 5.07%
|
|
Minnesota State University Mankato
73 publications, 3.7%
|
|
Clark University
54 publications, 2.74%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
45 publications, 2.28%
|
|
Montana State University
37 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Cornell University
26 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Waterloo
24 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Texas A&M University
23 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Stanford University
21 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
18 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
18 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
14 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Brown University
13 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
12 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
12 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
12 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Université de Montréal
12 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
11 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Northeastern University
11 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of North Texas
10 publications, 0.51%
|
|
ETH Zurich
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Warwick
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Siegen
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Texas at El Paso
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Carleton University
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Leicester
9 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Boston University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Florida International University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Reichman University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Washington
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Chicago
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Toronto
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Cambridge
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stony Brook University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Western University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of New Mexico
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Aalto University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
National University of Singapore
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yale University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Columbia University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Technical University of Berlin
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Paris Cité University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Kentucky
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Georgetown University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Arizona State University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
DePaul University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Patras
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Utah State University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Cyprus
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Iowa State University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Auckland
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Princeton University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Washington State University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Tufts University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Graz University of Technology
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Boston College
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Saarland University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Porto
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Manitoba
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Miami
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Utah
3 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
22 publications, 7.36%
|
|
Clark University
18 publications, 6.02%
|
|
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
15 publications, 5.02%
|
|
University of Rochester
15 publications, 5.02%
|
|
Minnesota State University Mankato
14 publications, 4.68%
|
|
University of Siegen
8 publications, 2.68%
|
|
Reichman University
7 publications, 2.34%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
4 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 1%
|
|
Montana State University
3 publications, 1%
|
|
Stony Brook University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Boston University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Vienna University of Technology
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Tver State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Tsinghua University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Aalto University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Parma
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Gran Sasso Science Institute
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Charles University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Towson University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
DePaul University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Chicago
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Paderborn University
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Potsdam
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Salzburg
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Toronto
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of Montpellier
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
University of New Brunswick
1 publication, 0.33%
|
|
Show all (24 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 853, 43.21%
USA
853 publications, 43.21%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 91, 4.61%
Israel
91 publications, 4.61%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 80, 4.05%
Canada
80 publications, 4.05%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 50, 2.53%
United Kingdom
50 publications, 2.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 47, 2.38%
Germany
47 publications, 2.38%
|
France
|
France, 36, 1.82%
France
36 publications, 1.82%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 26, 1.32%
Austria
26 publications, 1.32%
|
India
|
India, 26, 1.32%
India
26 publications, 1.32%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 21, 1.06%
Switzerland
21 publications, 1.06%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 19, 0.96%
Italy
19 publications, 0.96%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 16, 0.81%
Mexico
16 publications, 0.81%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 11, 0.56%
Greece
11 publications, 0.56%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 9, 0.46%
Australia
9 publications, 0.46%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 8, 0.41%
Netherlands
8 publications, 0.41%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 8, 0.41%
Singapore
8 publications, 0.41%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 8, 0.41%
Finland
8 publications, 0.41%
|
China
|
China, 5, 0.25%
China
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.25%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 0.25%
Belgium
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 5, 0.25%
Denmark
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 0.25%
Japan
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.2%
Russia
4 publications, 0.2%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.2%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.2%
Poland
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 0.15%
Spain
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.15%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.15%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.15%
Chile
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.15%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.1%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.1%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.1%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.1%
Romania
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.05%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.05%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.05%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.05%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.05%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.05%
UAE
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.05%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.05%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (10 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 111, 37.12%
USA
111 publications, 37.12%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 19, 6.35%
Austria
19 publications, 6.35%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 3.68%
Germany
11 publications, 3.68%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 3.68%
Israel
11 publications, 3.68%
|
France
|
France, 6, 2.01%
France
6 publications, 2.01%
|
India
|
India, 5, 1.67%
India
5 publications, 1.67%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1%
Italy
3 publications, 1%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1%
Canada
3 publications, 1%
|
China
|
China, 2, 0.67%
China
2 publications, 0.67%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 0.67%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 0.67%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.67%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.67%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.33%
Russia
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.33%
Greece
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.33%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.33%
Finland
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.33%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.33%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.33%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.33%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.33%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|