Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
Top-3 citing journals

Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
(5806 citations)

Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A
(569 citations)

Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu C
(568 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Tokyo
(166 publications)

Tokyo Institute of Technology
(52 publications)

Nagoya University
(51 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2843
Q3

Investigation of internal standard use for short-term drift correction in ICP-MS/MS
Braysher E.C., Brown R.J., Brown A.S.
Q3
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q3

Implementation of ISO 9001:2015: quality management system in the university by a verification method
Idan M.F.
This study aims to present new scientific methods to assess the extent of universities’ commitment to the international standard and to assess the quality level of university units according to the International Quality Management Standard 2015, in addition to applying the current internal audit. These scientific methods included calculating the arithmetic mean and standard deviation and drawing a control panel to determine the extent of commitment to the specification at the beginning and after qualification. Statistical values were calculated, including the arithmetic mean and standard deviation for each paragraph of the international specification after analyzing the questionnaire responses from volunteer students and professors. These forms included two models: the first of which included all paragraphs of the specification and the second was written differently to determine the accuracy and seriousness of the participants in the questionnaire. The standard deviation was 0.0 in most paragraphs of the specification, which means there was no dispersion in the selection of participants, indicating the success of the qualification process and increased awareness and interest in applying the specification among all concerned parties. The degree of importance of these paragraphs reached 5, and this was confirmed by aligning the upper and lower control lines with the average line, which is consistent with the internal audit reports, this proves the accuracy and credibility of this method in the evaluation process.
Q3

Toward ISO/IEC 17025 compliance: challenges and strategies for a university research laboratory
Bennari H., El Omari S., Habsaoui A., Chaair H., Belouafa S.
This study assesses the compliance of a university research laboratory with the ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 standard, focusing on ensuring technical competence and the integrity of analytical results. An analytical approach was employed using a standard checklist to identify gaps and establish a corrective action plan. The evaluation revealed significant deficiencies in the laboratory's structural, resource, and process requirements, resulting in an overall satisfaction rate of only 15%. This percentage reflects the proportion of conformity criteria met by the laboratory in relation to the standard’s requirements. These findings underscore the critical need for improvements in the laboratory’s quality management system to enhance the reliability and credibility of its research outputs. The study also emphasizes the importance of implementing robust quality control measures and continuous staff training to meet international standards, thus positioning the laboratory to achieve full ISO/IEC 17025 compliance in the future.
Q3

Implementing a new risk management culture in a forensic genetics laboratory: first steps
Silva I.C., de Oliveira Í.G., de Paranaiba R.T., Fassio L.H., da Silva Junior R.C., Trindade B.R.
The risk management approach has become crucial in quality management systems, to the extent that its importance has been reflected in the new version of ISO/IEC 17025:2017. In 2014, the Brazilian Federal Police’s Forensic Genetics Expertise Service (SEPGEF/PF) implemented a quality management system based on NBR ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This article outlines the initial steps taken to embed a risk management culture within the laboratory to align it with the new NBR ISO/IEC 17025:2017 version. The main focus was to analyze SEPGEF’s nonconformity records between august 2014 and april 2024 and, based on this, to develop methods for mapping, assessing and treating the risks associated with these events. Additionally, the main risks that threaten the integrity of DNA samples were discussed. We also presented future prospects for the unit in order to promote more effective management of the risks that affect its objectives.
Q3

Optimized RP-HPLC method development and validation for quantification of articaine in bulk and nanostructured lipid carriers using a quality-by-design framework
Khan S., Khan F.N.
The goal of the recent study was to establish a simple, precise, reliable, accurate, cost-effective, and stable RP-HPLC method with quality-by-design approach for estimating the amount of articaine in bulk and nanostructured lipid carriers which were developed in house. A fractional factorial design with four factors and eight runs was employed for the initial screening studies. Further optimization of mobile phase ratio and flow rate were conducted using a central composite design. The chromatographic method with reversed-phase chromatographic separation, C-18 column, mobile phase in a mixture of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) and acetonitrile in an 80:20 (% v/v) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and detection wavelength of 273 nm having retention time of 2.876 was developed. The newly developed method was validated as per the guidelines given by International Council for Harmonisation ICH Q2 (R1) which revealed linearity between 10 to 50 µg/mL with r2 = 0.995. The % RSD for intra-day precision ranged from 0.2089 to 0.5298, while for inter-day precision, it ranged from 0.1973 to 0.3899. The robustness values were less than 2 %. The percent drug recovered for NLCs was 99.12 %. Further, the limits of detection and quantification (LOQ) were determined to be 2.32 µg/mL and 4.12 µg/mL, respectively. The studies showed that the new approach is simple, selective, rapid, and reproducible for the assessment of pure drug and nanostructured lipid carriers-based formulations.
Q3

Investigation of oil and grease in surface soils of gas station, automobile repair workshop, urban, recreational area, and rural sites using FT-IR
BAYRAMOĞLU KARŞI M.B.
The principal objective of this study is to examine the oil and grease (OG) content in surface soil samples using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The standard solution is a mixture of isooctane and octanoic acid (1:1 by weight) in tetrachloroethylene. The linear working range was established to be between 25 and 350 ppm. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined to be 2.36 ppm, while the limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated to be 7.87 ppm. The mean recovery value of OG exhibited a range of 82.75% to 93.75% in surface soil samples. To assess the precision and accuracy of the method, standard addition experiments were conducted by spiking the isooctane and octanoic acid mixture, and the resulting spiked samples were analyzed in triplicate. After the completion of the validation studies, the concentrations of OG were determined in surface soil samples collected from regions hypothesized to have varying levels of pollution accumulation. These sampling sites included recreational areas, urban areas, rural areas, locations adjacent to gas stations, and areas near industrial sites. The determined OG concentrations are 15.9 ± 4.57, 6.9 ± 2.02, 2.4 ± 0.93, 14.9 ± 1.71, and 10.1 ± 1.16 µg/g dry weight (dw), respectively. Due to possible barbecue activities and other anthropogenic effects, the highest concentration of oil and grease was observed in the sample of the recreational area. The second highest concentration was found in gas station samples, likely due to heavy traffic and the gas station itself, while the lowest concentration was observed in the rural area, as expected due to the lack of potential pollution sources next to the sampling site. These findings indicate potential environmental risks in areas with high human activity and traffic, highlighting the need for remediation efforts. Also, the method of OG determination using infrared spectroscopy offers a more expedient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly approach for the analysis of soil samples, particularly due to the minimal use of chemicals. Also, the method of oil and grease determination using infrared spectroscopy offers a more expedient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly approach for the analysis of soil samples, particularly due to the minimal use of chemicals.
Q3

Green metrics-based HPLC method for quantification of three antidiabetic drugs in tablet dosage form using Box–Behnken design
Kalpana P., Raj B., Ritika P., Devang T., Rajesh P., Tejal G.
This paper describes the systematic development of green and sustainable HPLC method for quantification of antidiabetic drugs teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate, metformin hydrochloride and pioglitazone HCl in tablet formulation using Box–Behnken design. Box–Behnken design was used to know the influence of identified critical method parameters, volume of acetonitrile, flow rate and column temperature on the retention time of all three drugs and resolution between two drugs. Statistical analysis by Analysis of variance was computed to understand the potential interactions among critical method parameters. Further mathematical model was validated by using statistical and graphical optimization to define the design space. From the three parameters under investigation the study revealed that the response was more influenced by slight change in volume of acetonitrile, demanding its strict control. A mixture of KH2PO4 phosphate buffer (20 mM): acetonitrile: methanol (40:30:30%v/v) was employed as the mobile phase for chromatographic separation using octadecyl silyl column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm). Detection was performed at 236 nm and 0.86 ml/min was set as the flow rate of mobile phase. The linearity was observed in the range of 12–28 µg/ml for Teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate, 300–700 µg/ml for Metformin hydrochloride and 9–21 µg/ml for Pioglitazone hydrochloride as shown by r2 ≥ 0.99 for all three drugs. Retention time of Teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate, Metformin hydrochloride and Pioglitazone hydrochloride was 4.09, 3.01 and 11.44 min, respectively. The % relative standard deviation for accuracy, precision and robustness were all within the specification, less than 2, which indicates that method was validated properly as per guideline. The studies successfully demonstrate the application of Box–Behnken design in the development of accurate and sensitive liquid chromatographic technique with enhanced method performance. Furthermore, greenness of the analytical method was assessed using 12 principles of green analytical chemistry by AGREE, complex GAPI and Analytical eco-scale tool, indicating that the developed method was ecofriendly.
Q3

Production and certification of a freeze-dried reference material for human urinary steroids to ensure quality of longitudinal profiling data
Murby E.J., Croft M., Liu F., Johnston L., Saveluc G., Trout M.
Records of elite athletes’ steroid profiles are maintained by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to facilitate detection of doping with endogenous steroids. As the steroid measurements comprising these profiles are obtained in a variety of laboratories throughout an athlete’s career. It is critical to ensure their metrological traceability to a fixed reference, which permits meaningful identification of any changes. Certified reference materials (CRMs) are an important tool to ensure the comparability of measurement results. The National Measurement Institute, Australia, has prepared a freeze-dried urine CRM, NMIA MX017, with property values for the mass fractions and mass concentrations of the six steroids specified by WADA as markers for the urinary steroid profile. Its reference values are traceable to the units (kg and m) of the international system of units (SI), and it is now available to be used by WADA-accredited laboratories as a replacement for a previous, exhausted CRM. The certification of NMIA MX017 was performed using a high accuracy reference method developed specifically for this material. A two-dimensional clean-up of the urine matrix by high-performance liquid chromatography provided interference-free quantification of the analytes and their deuterium-labelled analogues by gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Confirmatory analysis by gas chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry was used to verify the absence of bias due to potential influences by matrix coextractives or contaminants. The characterisation of NMIA MX017 and the approach used to obtain a rigorous estimate of the measurement uncertainty of the property values of the CRM are described.
Q3

Proficiency test of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant detection in diagnostics samples by veterinary diagnostic laboratories
Singh N., Miller M.R., Nemser S.M., Tkachenko A., Uhlig S., Frost K., Hettwer K., Ulaszek J., Kmet M., Wang L., Allender M.C., Reddy R.
Abstract
Veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) play a critical role in screening both human and animal samples for SARS-CoV-2. To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 detection methods used by VDLs, a proficiency test was performed by the US Food and Drug Administration’s Veterinary Laboratory and Investigation and Response Network in collaboration with two other organizations. Thirty-two sets of 12 blind-coded samples were prepared by fortifying Molecular Transport Medium (MTM) or feline feces with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant or non-SARS-CoV-2 equine coronavirus RNA at various concentrations and shipped to 32 participants for blinded (unbiased) analysis. Results were analyzed according to the principles of International Organization for Standardization 16140-2:2016 using two approaches such as establishing the rate of detection (ROD) and the success rate by applying the analysis of binary outcome by logit approach. ROD provided the overall assessment of laboratories performance, whereas the novel logit approach provided an insight to more specific analysis based on the complexity of each sample. The ROD was 83% and 98% for MTM samples at 200 and 20000 genome copies per 100 µL, respectively. Fecal samples were classified as challenging exploratory, and results were not included in the assessment of performance but discussion purposes only. Fecal samples exhibited matrix interference impacting the performance. The ROD was 44% and 89% for fecal samples at 2000 and 20000 genome copies per 100 µL, respectively. The non-COVID coronavirus RNA, which was used to address the specificity, did not interfere with methods used. Establishing the success rate by evaluating the qualitative results (detected/not detected) applying a logit approach revealed that, out of thirty-two participants, twenty-eight had satisfactory results, one participant had unsatisfactory results, and three participants had questionable results for MTM samples. For fecal samples, three participants out of thirty-two did not meet the expectations at higher concentrations. Lower concentrations of fecal samples were excluded from this analysis. Again, the fecal samples were considered as challenge samples and the results were provided to assist participants in their continuous efforts to improve their performance and not to evaluate their performance.
Q3

The PT/EQA community finally meets again!
Brookman B.
Q3
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q3

Laboratory performances during proficiency tests for the analysis of active substances in pesticide formulations during 2021–2023
Santilio A., Cammarata R., Girolimetti S.
During the period 2021–2023, the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) organised, in collaboration with the Italian Health Ministry, proficiency testing (PTs) for about 22 Italian and other EU laboratories involved in the monitoring programmes for Plant Protection Products (PPPs). The aim of the PTs was to determine the amount of active ingredient in various formulations of PPPs. Overall, the type of formulations to be analysed were soluble concentrate (SL), suspension concentrate (SC), capsule suspension (CS), emulsion water oil (EW), soluble water granule (SG), dustable powder (DP), water dispersible granule (WDG) and emulsion concentrate (EC). In 2021, the ISS organised PTs for the determination of Imazamox, Fenhexamid and Trinexapac-ethyl in three different PPPs as soluble concentrate (SL), suspension concentrate (SC), and capsule suspension (CS), respectively. In 2022, PTs for the determination of Bentazone, Spinosad and Tau-Fluvalinate were organised. For this PTs, commercial PPPs were obtained from the Italian market as SC, emulsion oil water (EW) and soluble water granule (SG). In 2023, the PT was organised to determine the active ingredient Trifloxystrobin, Deltamethrin and Cyprodinil in the commercial product as water dispersible granule (WDG), dustable powder (DP) and emulsion concentrate (EC), respectively. Homogeneity and stability, performed for all PT samples, fulfilled the acceptability criteria. The Jarque–Bera test was used to verify the hypothesis of normality of the data distributions before to calculate the z-score values. Laboratory performances, expressed in terms of z-scores, were satisfactory for almost all participants for all substances.
Q3

An ID-HPLC–MS/MS based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of valproic acid in human serum
Ji H., Wang H., Yang E., Sun Q., Wang W., Li L., Li Y., Yang X., Chen S., Shen M., Pan Q.
Valproic acid (VPA) is widely used for the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder and other psychiatric diseases. Because of its narrow therapeutic window, monitoring the concentrations of VPA in patient’s serum is essential. In this paper, an isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-(ID-HPLC–MS/MS) based candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the quantification of VPA in human serum was established. After Samples pre-prepared by a simple protein precipitation method, the basic analytical performances of the candidate RMP was validated, including specificity, matrix effect, linearity, limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD), intra-and inter-batch precision, recovery rate, carryover, and stability. In order to make the measurement results of VPA traceable, we took all components that affect the accuracy of VPA measurement results into account to evaluate the corresponding uncertainties according to the GUM, including measurement imprecision, the purity of VPA standard, uncertainties caused by weighing during the preparation of calibrators and samples, matrix effect, recovery rate, carryover and sample stability. The candidate RMP separated VPA from potentially interferents in human serum and enabled measurement over a calibrated linear range from 2.60 to 203.57 μg/mL with a good correlation coefficient of 0.9995, and no significant matrix effects were observed. The intra-day and inter-day coefficients of variation (CV%) were 0.30–1.64% and 0.67–1.39%, respectively. The average recovery rates were between 94.55% and 96.93%. The LOD and LOQ were 0.23 μg/mL and 2.10 μg/mL, respectively. The expanded measurement uncertainties were 3.19% (k = 2) at 9.45 μg/mL, 3.14% (k = 2) at 48.86 μg/mL, and 2.95% (k = 2) at 97.23 μg/mL (k = 2), respectively.
Q3

Value assignment and uncertainty evaluation for certified reference gas mixtures
Cecelski C.E., Carney J., Possolo A.
AbstractThe procedures used to assign values to certified reference gas mixtures and to evaluate their associated uncertainties, which are described in ISO 6143, and that were variously improved by Guenther and Possolo (Anal Bioanal Chem 399:489–500, 2011. 10.1007/s00216-010-4379-z), are further enhanced by the following developments: (i) evaluating and propagating uncertainty contributions derived from comparisons with historical reference gas mixtures of similar nominal composition; (ii) recognizing and quantifying mutual inconsistency (dark uncertainty) between primary standard gas mixtures used for calibration; (iii) employing Bayesian procedures for calibration, value assignment, and uncertainty evaluations; and (iv) employing state-of-the-art methods of meta-analysis to combine cylinder-specific measurement results. These developments are illustrated in examples of certification of two gas mixture Standard Reference Materials developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, USA). These examples serve only to demonstrate the methods described in this contribution and do not replace any official measurement results delivered in the certificates of any reference materials developed by NIST.
Q3

Promotion of metrological traceability through the provision of a metrologically traceable proficiency testing reference value for the mass fraction of benzoic acid in fish sauce
Lau J.P., Fung A.W.
The present paper outlines a joint proficiency testing (PT) programme established between the Asia–Pacific Metrology Programme (APMP) and the Asia Pacific Accreditation Cooperation (APAC). This programme aims to assess the analytical performance and enhance measurement proficiencies in laboratories across various economies, with a focus on the quantification of benzoic acid in fish sauce. This PT programme was organised by the Government Laboratory, the designated institute of metrology in chemistry for Hong Kong, China (GLHK). A comprehensive invitation extended to both APMP and non-APAC members resulted in the participation of 41 laboratories from 19 different economies. The metrological reference value for benzoic acid, provided by GLHK, was determined utilizing isotope-dilution mass spectroscopy (IDMS) with traceability to the International System of Units (SI). This SI-traceable reference value enhances the quality of participants’ measurements and promotes the awareness of traceability among the participants, enabling a more accurate evaluation of their results. Concurrently, this approach facilitates the building of measurement capabilities among participants, fostering more robust connections between metrology institutes and testing laboratories. The programme also revealed a notable deficiency in the understanding of statistical concepts among some participants, including the coverage factor, degrees of freedom, standard uncertainty, and expanded uncertainty. Proper interpretation of zeta-scores or En scores based on measurement uncertainties, when analysed alongside z-scores, proves to be indispensable for an accurate assessment of the participants’ measurement competencies and their ability to evaluate measurement uncertainty. The assessment of participants’ performances, taking into account measurement uncertainties, serves as a benchmark for participants to gauge the validity of their measurement uncertainty evaluations.
Q3

Quality control charts for short or long runs without a training phase. Part 2. Performances in the presence of a persistent systematic error and simultaneous small shifts in the mean and the variance
Alvarez-Prieto M., Páez-Montero R.
Sometimes, analytical laboratories receive requests with a small number of determinations and/or samples or outside the typical scope of analytical services. As a result, they may not have historical data on the performance of the required analytical procedures and/or appropriate reference materials. Under these conditions, it is difficult or uneconomical to use traditional quality control charts. This is the so-called start-up problem of these charts. Quesenberry’s Q charts are appropriate in these situations because they do not require a prior training phase. In the first part of this series of publications, the fundamentals and the algebraic expressions of the Q charts were presented for the individual measurements for the mean (four cases) and for the variance (two cases). This experimental study was carried out with data from quality control of mass fractions of Co in a serpentinite CRM and SiO2 in a laterite CRM, by ICP-OES. The performance of Q charts is discussed in two situations: when the analytical process showed a clear systematic error from the beginning and when small shifts in mean and variance occurred simultaneously. In the first situation, performances of Q charts for the mean depended on the case: two of them were very sensitive even in the short run and the other two were insensitive and useless. In the second situation, the Q charts showed delayed alarms, but with a comparable behavior to the chart for individual measurements and the moving range of two. EWMA charts associated to Q charts were an excellent complement.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
5806 citations, 35.02%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A
569 citations, 3.43%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu C
568 citations, 3.43%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu E
382 citations, 2.3%
|
|
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering
337 citations, 2.03%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu F
296 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu D
246 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE))
223 citations, 1.34%
|
|
Zairyo/Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan
207 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu B
184 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
169 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Japanese Journal of JSCE
168 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology
152 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Engineering Structures
142 citations, 0.86%
|
|
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING / EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
136 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Structural Engineering
112 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers
105 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Structures
93 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser B2 (Coastal Engineering)
93 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
89 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering)
87 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
85 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering
84 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
79 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE
74 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
71 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser E2 (Materials and Concrete Structures)
71 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu G
66 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
65 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Soils and Foundations
63 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser C (Geosphere Engineering)
62 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Bridge Engineering
61 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of MMIJ
61 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication
61 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Japanese Geotechnical Journal
58 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan
57 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
48 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)
47 citations, 0.28%
|
|
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
46 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Computers and Geotechnics
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Buildings
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Materials
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Shigen-to-Sozai
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
AIJ Journal of Technology and Design
42 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE
42 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
39 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Yosetsu Gakkai Ronbunshu/Quarterly Journal of the Japan Welding Society
38 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
38 citations, 0.23%
|
|
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
38 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser B3 (Ocean Engineering)
38 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Disaster Research
36 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. E1 (Pavement Engineering)
36 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
35 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Sustainability
35 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering
33 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Zairyo-to-Kankyo
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser F1 (Tunnel Engineering)
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
30 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
30 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Composites for Construction
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Geosynthetics Engineering Journal
29 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
28 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Thin-Walled Structures
28 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
28 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Structural Concrete
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Studies in Regional Science
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Key Engineering Materials
24 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Steel Structures
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Geotechnical Testing Journal
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Geomechanics
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser A2 (Applied Mechanics (AM))
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser G (Environmental Research)
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advances in Structural Engineering
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Transportation
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Case Studies in Construction Materials
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Acta Geotechnica
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of the Japan Landslide Society
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Shock and Vibration
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Marine Georesources and Geotechnology
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Transportation Research, Series B: Methodological
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
MATEC Web of Conferences
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
RILEM Bookseries
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cement and Concrete Composites
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Procedia Engineering
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Tetsu-To-Hagane/Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers Ser F4 (Construction and Management)
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Transportation Geotechnics
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
9327 citations, 56.25%
|
|
Elsevier
1419 citations, 8.56%
|
|
Springer Nature
819 citations, 4.94%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
545 citations, 3.29%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
459 citations, 2.77%
|
|
MDPI
345 citations, 2.08%
|
|
Wiley
284 citations, 1.71%
|
|
The Society of Materials Science, Japan
207 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Japanese Geotechnical Society
176 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
173 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Japan Concrete Institute
117 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
114 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
91 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering
84 citations, 0.51%
|
|
The City Planning Institute of Japan
62 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
58 citations, 0.35%
|
|
54 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources
53 citations, 0.32%
|
|
SAGE
47 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Ken-yusha, Inc.
47 citations, 0.28%
|
|
The Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Emerald
41 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Japan Society on Water Environment
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Japan Society of Corrosion Engineering
33 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Japan Welding Society
33 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
AIP Publishing
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Japan Chapter of International Geosynthetics Society
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Thomas Telford
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Copernicus
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ASME International
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
EDP Sciences
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Japan Section of the Regional Science Association International
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IOP Publishing
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
ASTM International
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tokyo Geographical Society
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Japan Landslide Society
19 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Oxford University Press
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Korean Society of Steel Construction
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Multiphase Flow
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
17 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Concrete Institute
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Society of Chemical Engineers, Japan
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Society of Engineering Geology
14 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Cement Association
13 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Japan Association for Wind Engineering
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IGI Global
11 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Academy
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
World Scientific
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IWA Publishing
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Geological Society of Japan
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society of Waste Management Experts
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Petroleum Institute
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Association of Groundwater Hydrology
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society of Kansei Engineering
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Institute of Navigation
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Rubber Industry, Japan
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SAE International
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Operations Research Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society of Water Treatment Biology
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Atomic Energy Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ministry of Agriculture
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Acoustical Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexandria University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Japan Institute of Energy
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Resources Processing Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Meteorological Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oceanographic Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
University of Tokyo
166 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
52 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Nagoya University
51 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Kyoto University
47 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Tohoku University
41 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Asian Institute of Technology
27 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hokkaido University
23 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Saitama University
22 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Kumamoto University
19 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Okayama University
16 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Osaka Metropolitan University
15 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Yamaguchi University
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Hosei University
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Nagoya Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Kanazawa University
11 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Chuo University
11 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Osaka University
10 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Waseda University
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
Kitami Institute of Technology
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
Tokyo Denki University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Kyushu University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Nagasaki University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Ibaraki University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Thammasat University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Yokohama National University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Nagaoka University of Technology
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Tokyo Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Tokai University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Nihon University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Gunma University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Gifu University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Kagoshima University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Ehime University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Nippon Steel Corporation (Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation)
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Utsunomiya University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Toyohashi University of Technology
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Tohoku Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Akita University
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Saga University
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Imperial College London
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Cairo University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Hiroshima University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Shinshu University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
University of Miyazaki
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Muroran Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
Kansai University
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
National Defense Academy of Japan
4 publications, 0.04%
|
|
NED University of Engineering and Technology
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Southern California
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
National Taiwan University
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Canterbury
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Western Australia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Princeton University
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Waterloo
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Kyushu Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Delaware
3 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Tongji University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Hanyang University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Ritsumeikan University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Shimane University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Meijo University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of the Ryukyus
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Osaka Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Kanagawa University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Lehigh University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
École de Technologie Supérieure
2 publications, 0.02%
|
|
Marine Hydrophysical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
Nanjing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Japan
|
Japan, 659, 7.34%
Japan
659 publications, 7.34%
|
USA
|
USA, 79, 0.88%
USA
79 publications, 0.88%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 35, 0.39%
Thailand
35 publications, 0.39%
|
China
|
China, 24, 0.27%
China
24 publications, 0.27%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 13, 0.14%
United Kingdom
13 publications, 0.14%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 13, 0.14%
Republic of Korea
13 publications, 0.14%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 12, 0.13%
Italy
12 publications, 0.13%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 11, 0.12%
Canada
11 publications, 0.12%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 6, 0.07%
Germany
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 6, 0.07%
Australia
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.07%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 0.04%
Denmark
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 4, 0.04%
Sri Lanka
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.03%
Greece
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.03%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 3, 0.03%
Iraq
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.03%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.03%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.03%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.03%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.03%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.02%
France
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.02%
Norway
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.02%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.02%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.01%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.01%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.01%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.01%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.01%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.01%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.01%
India
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.01%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.01%
Panama
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.01%
Poland
1 publication, 0.01%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.01%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.01%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.01%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.01%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (8 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|