Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
1.6
SJR
0.470
CiteScore
1.9
Categories
Anthropology
Cultural Studies
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2004-2024
journal names
Du Bois Review
Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race
DU BOIS REV
Top-3 citing journals

Du Bois Review
(236 citations)

Social Science and Medicine
(146 citations)

Ethnic and Racial Studies
(138 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(70 publications)

University of Michigan
(29 publications)

University of Chicago
(25 publications)

Stanford University
(5 publications)

University of California, Los Angeles
(4 publications)

University of Southern California
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1588
Q1

Oboe educators’ perspectives on playing-related injury, Part II: Barriers, solutions, and teaching practices
Macdonald H.M., Guptill C.
Music educators are uniquely positioned to promote student playing-related health, yet little is known about their current approach to student wellness. This article aimed to identify barriers and solutions to musician health promotion and to document studio music instructors’ approaches to wellness topics with students. Using a qualitative description approach, in-depth interviews with 10 oboe teachers (7 male, 3 female, 5 with personal history of injury) documented perceptions and practices surrounding playing-related injury (PRI). Participants identified several barriers to help-seeking behaviors among musicians, including shame, stigma, discrimination, heavy course loads, and abuse. Proposed solutions for these barriers included self-care, accessible resources, vulnerability, empathy, positive framing, and institutional support for wellness initiatives. Participants’ teaching practices emphasized adaptable lesson plans, cultivating independence and efficiency, and positive framing. With injured students, they described referring to medical professionals, encouraging physical activity, emphasizing posture and alignment, recommending instrument modifications and supports, making sure that reeds and instrument are functioning well, and incorporating rest into lesson and practice plans. Participants demonstrated a nuanced understanding of how best to approach musicians’ wellness topics with students (e.g. positive framing, vulnerability, empathy, emphasizing efficiency). Educational wellness initiatives could achieve greater efficacy through direct consultation and collaboration with teachers.
Q1

Chinese music in Sydney, Australia, and new modes of transmission: The case of a community conservatory
Wang K., Webb M.
Chinese people have performed their music in Sydney (Australia) for well over a century, albeit with fluctuating frequency and mostly to Chinese audiences. Since 2015, interest in Chinese music has been mounting in Sydney. This case study explores the experiences of nine instructors who teach Chinese musical instruments at a private music conservatory which one of them founded. The data collected reveal that: teaching Chinese music in a multicultural diasporic context involves a range of unique challenges; while there has been an increase in the number of people learning Chinese musical instruments, the music is still not widely known or popular in Australia, and; the study’s participants are successfully employing a range of novel strategies to address some of the challenges and to raise the music’s public profile. The study uncovers aspects of Chinese music’s dynamism in a multicultural context, and the vibrancy it brings to Australia’s contemporary culture.
Q1

Achievements, difficulties, and goals of the Spanish Society for Music Education (SEM-EE): A phenomenological study
Álamo Orellana A., Martínez-Rodríguez M.
The Spanish Society for Music Education ( Sociedad para la Educación Musical del Estado Español, SEM-EE in its Spanish acronym), has been dedicated to music education for almost half a century. Even so, it is currently difficult to find studies on its activity or impact. The aim of this study is to learn about the achievements, difficulties, and goals for SEM-EE that have emerged along the way and will come in the future. This has been done through a qualitative phenomenological study, analyzing 18 interviews carried out with members of the boards of directors, and codified through Atlas.ti software program. The results show that some of the greatest achievements of this organization have been to carry out activities, facilitate the connection between professionals from different fields of music education, and the promotion of music research. The lack of support, both institutional and from the educational community, along with scarce economic resources were some of the most noted difficulties. Future goals point to promoting more dialog with the administration, and the improvement of technological resources. The implications of this work can be relevant for music teaching professionals interested in the advancement of music education based on bringing together different collectives.
Q1

Understanding music teachers’ formative assessment intention and implementation: A Chinese Mainland context
Zhang L., Yan Z., Wang X.
Formative assessment is essential in music education as it supports the music learning process, which relies mostly on feedback from self and others to improve performance. Despite growing interest in formative assessment across various subjects, there is a lack of empirical evidence on how it is applied specifically in music education. Given the crucial role of teachers in the effective implementation of formative assessment, this study aims to examine music teachers’ intentions and implementation of formative assessment, along with the factors influencing them, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. A total of 671 music teachers from 29 cities/provinces of Mainland China were surveyed. The structural equation modeling results indicate that in the Chinese Mainland school music education context, a positive attitude toward formative assessment, a supportive and collaborative social environment, and strong confidence in using formative assessment enhance teachers’ intentions to adopt it. Additionally, greater confidence directly increases actual implementation. However, increased school support did not significantly impact teachers’ intentions or their implementation of formative assessment. The findings suggest that school administrators should focus on helping music teachers build confidence and fostering a collaborative, supportive culture for using formative assessment practices to improve music learning.
Q1

High school music teachers’ attitudes and practices regarding culturally responsive teaching in musical theatre production
Chaiwanichsiri A.
Cultural awareness is crucial in fostering inclusive and authentically representative musical theatre productions in today’s diverse educational landscape. I designed this study to examine U.S. music teachers’ attitudes, perspectives, and the integration of strategies related to culturally responsive teaching (CRT) into their high school musical theatre productions, including the challenges they encounter and their suggestions. Analysis of responses to the electronic survey ( N = 119) indicated a strong emphasis on integrating cultural awareness across various stages of musical production, aligning with Gay’s five essential elements for CRT implementation. Teachers prioritized selecting culturally valid musicals that were responsive to students’ skills and diverse backgrounds while fostering cultural appreciation. Despite challenges such as finding culture bearers and accessing some culturally diverse materials, they did curate culturally accurate and relevant materials to deepen students’ cultural understanding, guiding them in interpreting and performing musical songs using appropriate diverse vocal styles in a healthy manner. Establishing a safe space where students felt acknowledged and could freely discuss, share, lead, and collaborate was integral to these efforts. Ultimately, these practices aimed to cultivate students’ respect for their own and other cultures, promote diversity, inclusivity, and enhance the overall quality of the musical presentation.
Q1

A case study on integrating arts activities with the loose parts in preschool’s in-between spaces
Liao M., Chen L., Huang P.
This study investigated the integration of loose parts into preschool arts education to enhance children’s learning experiences, particularly within in-between spaces and centered around music, combining visual arts and dramatic play. Conducted as a case study in a Taiwanese private preschool, the research explored the use of loose parts in art activities inspired by the song “Joyfully Setting off Firecrackers” during the Lunar New Year festival. Over 3 months, a teacher guided seven children, collecting data through interviews, teacher journals, and analyses of children’s work. The findings revealed that selecting a distinctive children’s song allowed the teacher to design engaging activities that encouraged exploration of musical elements and diverse artistic expressions, thereby increasing motivation and collaboration. The curriculum involved environmental exploration, associating loose parts with musical elements, and culminated in creating listening maps and ensemble performances. By integrating visual arts and dramatic play around music, this strategy enhanced children’s enthusiasm for creative expression and facilitated esthetic development. The study also highlighted the environment’s crucial role in shaping engagement, with a preference for outdoor activities. This research contributes to literature by underscoring the value of integrating arts education with loose parts, enhancing children’s learning experiences and fostering creative engagement.
Q1

Online curriculum marketplaces and music education: A critical analysis of music activities on TeachersPayTeachers.com
O’Leary E.J., Bannerman J.K.
TeachersPayTeachers.com is an online marketplace where sellers offer learning activities, lesson plans, decorations, and related materials for use in school classrooms. The marketplace includes thousands of music education materials that are used by teachers throughout the United States. The purpose of this study was to explore the content of what is sold, who is selling materials on the platform, and the quality of the music activities. Our analysis of the 500 most-rated music items indicates that sellers are primarily marketing activities, classroom materials, and decorations on the platform. Despite listings from 91 different sellers, a small number of active “teacherpreneurs” were responsible for most of the materials. Our analysis of the quality of the top 50 activities shows that materials are generally aesthetically pleasing and clear in purpose, yet may may not promote authentic pedagogical practices in music education. The scope of resources available combined with the level of adoption shows that this platform has the potential to elevate worksheets and notational activities to the same level as meaningful musical engagements. We discuss findings in relation to curriculum development, teacher agency, and the potential for TpT and similar platforms to impact how music educators curate curriculum resources for use in their classrooms.
Q1

The integration of musical contents in the classroom of the second cycle of early childhood education
Curbelo-González O., Hernández-Dionis P., Martín Sanz C., Pérez-Jorge D.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the substantial advantages of integrating music education into the overall development of students, particularly in early childhood education. This integration allows for combining music education with various curriculum areas, utilizing its playful and motivating nature as a practical methodological tool for developing a wide range of skills. This study examines the implementation of music education in the second cycle of early childhood education in the Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands, analyzing practices in 82 educational centers. The findings reveal that specialized music teachers are responsible for teaching this content in almost half of the centers, with variations in the frequency of teaching specific specialized topics, with musical instruments being the most common. The study emphasizes the significance of incorporating musical activities involving voice and body in early childhood education, highlighting the importance of fostering auditory perception and using musical instruments to achieve a comprehensive and well-rounded integration in the curriculum.
Q1

Teaching artists or live performers? Early careers after a Jazz Master’s graduation in French-speaking Switzerland
Widmann H., Perrenoud M., Güsewell A., Audétat M.
This article presents the results of the “Jazz Alumni” survey conducted in 2022 on the career beginnings of the musicians who obtained a jazz master’s degree at HEMU—Haute école de musique in French-speaking Switzerland between 2011 and 2017. Based on a mixed-methods diachronic approach, the study included 45 graduates (38 men and 7 women). Like most performing artists, they experience professional instability and are faced with low incomes compared to their level of training. Our study indicates that jazz graduates predominantly rely on teaching to mitigate the risks associated with the precarious nature of their profession, thereby improving their working conditions and generally avoiding non-musical work. Further findings identify two distinct approaches to balancing teaching and performing. Possible explanations for these different career paths include socialization to different national regulatory regimes and gender inequalities.
Q1

Creating affordances for families with young children: Experiences of music education in social work
Huhtinen-Hildén L., Kivijärvi S., Elomaa-Krapu M., Isola A.
The current research examines the possibilities of music education in supporting the well-being of families living in demanding life situations. The context for the study is Family Sound Hammock, a 3-year research and development project that took place in the metropolitan area of Finland from 2020 to 2023. The project aimed at systematically supporting the well-being of families especially by strengthening their capacities for interaction in and through music education activities. This phenomenological-hermeneutic research focusses on the affordances emerging in family music activities, asking the following: What kinds of affordances can be recognised in and through music activities as part of family social work? The findings are presented in three categories: (1) Experiential environment of music education practice, (2) Social interaction and (3) Experiences of consistency that each highlight the potential of music education for redirecting agency, participation and inclusion of parents and children. The findings emphasise the professional facilitation of an inviting and safe musico-pedagogical environment applying pedagogical sensitivity.
Q1

The effect of a practice checklist on performance achievement, practice time, focal practice areas, and practice strategies of collegiate non-music majors enrolled in a beginning “Danso,” Korean traditional wind instrument class
Bae S., Kwon S., Lee J.
This study investigated the effects of a practice checklist on performance achievement, practice time, focal practice areas—the key musical elements students focused on during practice—and practice strategies among non-music major South Korean college students learning the Danso, a traditional Korean wind instrument. Ninety-six students participated, with 46 in the experimental group using a practice checklist and 50 in the control group without the checklist. All participants attended a 50-min weekly class for 7 weeks. At the end of the 7-week period, both groups were surveyed to measure their average weekly practice time and focal practice areas. Performance achievement was assessed through a test focusing on key musical elements, and practice strategies were evaluated using a modified version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The results revealed that using a practice checklist significantly improved performance in specific areas such as rhythm, tempo, and breathing but did not increase overall practice time. The checklist also helped students maintain a balanced focus on key musical elements, preventing an overemphasis on sound production. However, the checklist did not significantly promote the use of metacognitive strategies, indicating a need for additional instructional support.
Q1

Trauma-sensitive teaching: Supporting refugee students through music education
Lin K.
Refugee children are a significant part of contemporary Canadian classrooms. Children who have fled their homes as refugees have experienced trauma and bear the effects of it socially, emotionally and academically. My study identifies trauma-sensitive strategies that music educators in Ontario are using to support refugee students from kindergarten to Grade 8. Through three semi-structured interviews with K–8 music educators, I identified four main themes to trauma-sensitive music instruction. Trauma-sensitive music education (a) provides holistic care for refugee students; (b) supports refugee students in feeling empowered; (c) provides a space in which refugee students can cultivate their sense of personal and collective awareness; and (d) enables refugee students to feel a sense of belonging. The implications of these findings provide music educators with practical tools and strategies to facilitate a learning environment in which refugee students can experience hope and healing.
Q1

An investigation of pre-service music teachers’ preferences and willingness to teach six ethnic music styles in Taiwan
Wu C.
The study aimed to examine Taiwanese fourth- and fifth-year pre-service music teachers’ preferences, familiarity, and willingness to teach six ethnic music styles (Chinese, Hokkien, Hakka, Taiwanese Aboriginal, Vietnamese, and Indonesian) to the largest ethnic student groups in Taiwan. Participants ( N = 126) listened to 18 ethnic music excerpts and rated their preferences, familiarity, and willingness to teach using 7-point Likert-type scales. As a validity check, the pre-service music teachers were required to identify the ethnic language in which each music example was performed. However, their ability to identify the languages did not strongly correlate with their preferences, familiarity, and willingness to teach the music examples.The findings indicated that the pre-service music teachers’ preferences and familiarity were positively correlated with their willingness to teach the six ethnic music styles. Moreover, the year of enrollment and the interaction between enrollment year and certificate level significantly influenced participants’ familiarity with the ethnic music styles. Furthermore, music training was a significant variable affecting the willingness to teach Hokkien music.
Q1

Extension of the 3 × 2 achievement goal model to university concert band performance
Rossin E.G.
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the 3 × 2 achievement goal model describes the goal orientations of university band students in two performance contexts. Students ( N = 183) enrolled in four concert band ensembles at two universities completed a goal orientation questionnaire, once in reference to personal music performance goals and once in reference to music performance goals as members of their university concert bands. The questionnaire, translated from the sports domain for use with musicians, measured the six goal orientations of the 3 × 2 achievement goal model: task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, other-avoidance. Results of confirmatory factor analyses indicate satisfactory fit of the six-factor model in the personal and ensemble contexts. In both contexts, the 3 × 2 model demonstrates better fit to the university band student data than ten alternative models. The model also demonstrates construct reliability and validity. Discussion includes evaluation of model fit differences between performance contexts. Future study of musician’s goal orientations could benefit from participant-level analysis and further examination of performance context differences. Continued development of a 3 × 2 achievement goal model scale for musicians could further bolster goal orientation research in the music domain.
Q1

What do music listening tests assess? Applying the Rasch testlet models to the HKDSE data
Chow J.K., Jin K., Siu W.L.
This study examines the adequacy of a general proficiency in music listening for describing how examinees responded to exam questions on various music genres based on an empirical investigation of a public music listening examination. In the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination (HKDSE), Music consists of three mandatory components: listening, performing, and creating. Notably, the listening component is evaluated through a written examination, allowing for objective scoring. A candidate’s performance on this exam has been summarized as a single score, a method that is effective for evaluation purposes, while the underlying conceptualization may oversimplify the depth of knowledge required for assessment. Consequently, we conducted a reevaluation of the HKDSE Music listening test, employing the Rasch testlet model to explore potential multidimensional structures. Our findings highlighted distinctive attributes in questions related to Cantonese opera, setting them apart from others. We discuss the implications of these findings for music assessment.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Du Bois Review
236 citations, 2.31%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
146 citations, 1.43%
|
|
Ethnic and Racial Studies
138 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
129 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
102 citations, 1%
|
|
Sociology Compass
90 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Social Problems
90 citations, 0.88%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
84 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Annual Review of Sociology
72 citations, 0.7%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
71 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Politics Groups and Identities
69 citations, 0.67%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
67 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
59 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Race and Social Problems
57 citations, 0.56%
|
|
SSM - Population Health
54 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
52 citations, 0.51%
|
|
PLoS ONE
48 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Social Science Research
46 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
45 citations, 0.44%
|
|
American Behavioral Scientist
42 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Political Research Quarterly
38 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Social Science Quarterly
37 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
City and Community
35 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Perspectives on Politics
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Criminology
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Critical Sociology
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Sociological Forum
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Sociological Review
32 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Social Forces
32 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Sociological Inquiry
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Migration Review
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Justice Quarterly
28 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Social Sciences
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Annual Review of Political Science
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sociological Perspectives
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Public Health
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Urban Health
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Political Behavior
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
25 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Aging and Health
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Race and Justice
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Demography
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
24 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of African American Studies
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Journal of Sociology
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Social Psychology Quarterly
23 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Environmental Sociology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Race Ethnicity and Education
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Crime and Delinquency
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Health and Place
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Identities
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
British Journal of Sociology
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Review of Black Political Economy
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Political Science Review
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal for Equity in Health
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Latino Studies
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
JAMA network open
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Population Research and Policy Review
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Politics Research
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sociology of Education
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Urban Affairs
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
PS - Political Science and Politics
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Ethnicity and Health
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Social Issues
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
The Urban Review
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Urban Studies
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Criminal Justice
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Review of Research in Education
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Urban Affairs Review
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Black Studies
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Journal of Criminal Justice
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Social Currents
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Homosexuality
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Urban Education
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Research Protocols
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Sociological Focus
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Educational Research Journal
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Sociological Theory
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Women, Politics and Policy
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Review of Criminology
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ethnicities
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pediatrics
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annual Review of Public Health
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Criminal Justice Review
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Environmental Justice
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Marriage and Family
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Criminology
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Health Affairs
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Polity
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
SAGE
1689 citations, 16.52%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1554 citations, 15.2%
|
|
Springer Nature
1246 citations, 12.18%
|
|
Wiley
1083 citations, 10.59%
|
|
Elsevier
953 citations, 9.32%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
696 citations, 6.81%
|
|
Oxford University Press
350 citations, 3.42%
|
|
MDPI
238 citations, 2.33%
|
|
Annual Reviews
180 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Emerald
127 citations, 1.24%
|
|
Duke University Press
121 citations, 1.18%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
106 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
104 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
102 citations, 1%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
77 citations, 0.75%
|
|
American Public Health Association
68 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
55 citations, 0.54%
|
|
IGI Global
55 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
52 citations, 0.51%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
42 citations, 0.41%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
41 citations, 0.4%
|
|
BMJ
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
32 citations, 0.31%
|
|
JMIR Publications
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
26 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
CAIRN
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
OpenEdition
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
University of California Press
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Economic Association
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Bristol University Press
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Brill
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
National Medical Association
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Center for the Study of the Presidency
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Society for Sociological Science
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Human Kinetics
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SciELO
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American College of Physicians
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AOSIS
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Intellect
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Berghahn Books
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MIT Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for the Sociology of Religion
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Indiana University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pluto Journals
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Association for the Study of Literature and Environment (ASLE)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Florida Gulf Coast University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasilia
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Harvard Education Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Guilford Publications
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cogitatio
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Marketing Association
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Michigan State University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Fundacao Carlos Chagas
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Harvard University
70 publications, 11.97%
|
|
University of Michigan
29 publications, 4.96%
|
|
University of Chicago
25 publications, 4.27%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
23 publications, 3.93%
|
|
Stanford University
20 publications, 3.42%
|
|
Columbia University
17 publications, 2.91%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
17 publications, 2.91%
|
|
Princeton University
11 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Northwestern University
10 publications, 1.71%
|
|
New York University
10 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
9 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
9 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
9 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Emory University
9 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Yale University
8 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
8 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Washington
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
7 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
6 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Wayne State University
6 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Connecticut
6 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Boston College
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Dartmouth College
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Brown University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Temple University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Toronto
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Texas A&M University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Tennessee
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Georgetown University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
North Carolina State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
George Mason University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Miami
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Mississippi State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Delaware
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Brunel University London
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Macquarie University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Howard University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
American University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Tufts University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
DePaul University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Loyola Marymount University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Grand Valley State University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Tulane University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Villanova University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Louisville
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Louisiana State University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Stony Brook University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Cape Town
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Lingnan University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Syracuse University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Ohio State University at Mansfield
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
San Francisco State University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Northeastern Illinois University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
North Park University
1 publication, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Stanford University
5 publications, 4.63%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
4 publications, 3.7%
|
|
University of Southern California
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Wayne State University
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 2.78%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
American University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Tennessee
2 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Macquarie University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Howard University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Lingnan University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Virginia Tech
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
North Park University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Chicago
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Ohio University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Illinois at Springfield
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Boston College
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Tulane University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Minnesota
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Brown University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Fordham University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Lehigh University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Texas at El Paso
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Western University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Louisiana State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Mississippi State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Fayetteville State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Utah State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Utah
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Old Dominion University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Nebraska at Omaha
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of the Republic
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Wesleyan University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Sam Houston State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Houston
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Essex
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Show all (46 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 457, 78.12%
USA
457 publications, 78.12%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 44, 7.52%
Italy
44 publications, 7.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 13, 2.22%
Canada
13 publications, 2.22%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 7, 1.2%
United Kingdom
7 publications, 1.2%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.85%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.85%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.68%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.68%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.51%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.51%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.51%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.34%
Germany
2 publications, 0.34%
|
China
|
China, 2, 0.34%
China
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.34%
Australia
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 2, 0.34%
Montenegro
2 publications, 0.34%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.17%
France
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.17%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.17%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.17%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.17%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.17%
UAE
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.17%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.17%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.17%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.17%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.17%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.17%
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 82, 75.93%
USA
82 publications, 75.93%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 3, 2.78%
United Kingdom
3 publications, 2.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 2.78%
Canada
3 publications, 2.78%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 1.85%
Netherlands
2 publications, 1.85%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.93%
France
1 publication, 0.93%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.93%
China
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.93%
Australia
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.93%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.93%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.93%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.93%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.93%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.93%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.93%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.93%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.93%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|