Open Access
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
SJR
0.625
CiteScore
3.3
Categories
Biomedical Engineering
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Rehabilitation
Areas
Engineering
Medicine
Years of issue
2019-2025
journal names
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Top-3 citing journals

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
(161 citations)

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
(99 citations)

Musculoskeletal Care
(47 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Boston University
(33 publications)

Lund University
(30 publications)

Harvard University
(23 publications)

Boston University
(31 publications)

Lund University
(29 publications)

Harvard University
(22 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4591
Q1

Microwave sea ice and ocean brightness temperature and emissivity between 22 and 243 GHz from ship-based radiometers
Rückert J.E., Walbröl A., Risse N., Krobot P., Haseneder-Lind R., Mech M., Ebell K., Spreen G.
Abstract
Passive microwave measurements of Arctic sea ice have been conducted over the last 50 years from space and during airborne, ship- and ground-based measurement campaigns. The different radiometric signatures of distinct surface types have led to satellite retrievals of, e.g., sea-ice concentration. In contrast, ground-based upward-viewing radiometers measure radiation emitted from the atmosphere and are used to retrieve atmospheric variables. Here, we present results from a ship-based radiometer setup with a mirror construction, which allows us to switch between atmospheric and surface measurements flexibly. This way, in summer 2022, surface observations in the Arctic marginal sea-ice zone could be performed from the research vessel Polarstern by two radiometers covering the frequency range from 22 to 243 GHz. At low frequencies, the brightness temperatures show clear signatures of different surface conditions. We estimate emissivities at 53∘ zenith angle from infrared-based skin temperatures. Predominantly vertically polarized 22–31 GHz emissivities are between 0.51 and 0.55 for open ocean and around 0.95 for sea ice. Predominantly horizontally polarized 243 GHz ocean emissivities are around 0.78 and ice surfaces exhibit a large variability from 0.67 to 0.82. Our results can improve the characterization of surface emissions in satellite retrieval algorithms.
Q1

Characteristics, origin, and significance of chessboard subgrain boundaries in the WAIS Divide Ice Core
Fitzpatrick J.J., Wilen L.A., Voigt D.E., Alley R.B., Fegyveresi J.M.
Q1

Distributed energy balance, mass balance and climate sensitivity of upper Chandra Basin glaciers, western Himalaya
Oulkar S.N., Sharma P., Pratap B., Thamban M., Laha S., Patel L.K., Singh A.T.
Abstract
Glacier and snow melt are the primary sources of water for streams, and rivers in upper Indus region of the western Himalaya. However, the magnitude of runoff from this glacierized basin is expected to vary with the available energy in the catchment. Here, we used a physically based energy balance model to estimate the surface energy and surface mass balance (SMB) of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers for 7 hydrological years from 2015 to 2022. A strong seasonality is observed, with net radiation being the dominant energy flux in the summer, while latent and sensible heat flux dominated in the winter. The estimated mean annual SMB of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers is −0.51 ± 0.28 m w.e. a−1, with a cumulative SMB of −3.54 m w.e during 7 years from 2015 to 2022. We find that the geographical factors like aspect, slope, size and elevation of the glacier contribute towards the spatial variability of SMB within the study region. The findings reveal that a 42% increase in precipitation is necessary to counteract the additional mass loss resulting from a 1°C increase in air temperature for the upper Chandra Basin glaciers.
Q1

Forecasting Arctic sea ice drift: insights from two case studies
Valisuo I., Tietsche S.
Abstract
The two main large-scale features of Arctic sea-ice drift are the Beaufort Gyre and the Transpolar Drift Stream. They exhibit strong intraseasonal and interannual variability. Winter 2016/17 showed increased cyclone activity, leading to the collapse of the Beaufort Sea high and the reversal of the Beaufort Gyre. Winter 2020/21 displayed decreased cyclone activity and intense anticyclonic ice transport in the Beaufort Gyre. Here we show that the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’s (ECMWF) extended-range (46 days) retrospective forecasts were able to predict the ice motion during these cases. The initial contrasts in sea level pressure, surface winds and ice drift were well captured, and their temporal evolution—including the reversal of the usual drift direction—well reproduced by the forecasts initialized about a week before the event. Sea-ice thickness in the forecast exhibited initial errors even greater than 1 m that persisted throughout the forecast and negatively affected the ice speed forecast. Despite these shortcomings, the dynamic forecast outperformed the persistence and climatology forecast and represented the observed relation between surface winds and ice drift well. The benefit of dynamic forecasts is especially clear in cases that differ from climatology, like the one we focus on.
Q1

Bragg scattering of surface-gravity waves by an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology
Konovalov Y.V.
Abstract
The propagation of elastic-flexural–gravity waves through an ice shelf is modeled using full three-dimensional elastic models that are coupled with a treatment of under-shelf sea-water flux: (i) finite-difference model (Model 1), (ii) finite-volume model (Model 2) and (iii) depth-integrated finite-difference model (Model 3). The sea-water flow under the ice shelf is described by a wave equation involving the pressure (the sea-water flow is treated as a “potential flow”). Numerical experiments were undertaken for an ice shelf with ‘rolling’ surface morphology, which implies a periodic structure of the ice shelf. The propagation of ocean waves through an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is accompanied by Bragg scattering (also called Floquet band insulation). The numerical experiments reveal that band gaps resulting from this scattering occur in the dispersion spectra in frequency bands that are consistent with the Bragg’s law. Band gaps render the medium opaque to wave, that is, essentially, the abatement of the incident ocean wave by ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is observed in the models. This abatement explains the ability of preserving of ice shelves like the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic, from the possible resonant-like destroying impact of ocean swell.
Q1

Towards a high-resolution sea ice model: exploring the potential of modelling ice floe fracture with the peridynamic method
Zhang Y., Lu W., Lubbad R., Løset S., Tsarau A., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Sea-ice deformation is concentrated at linear kinematic features such as ridges and leads. Ridging and leads opening processes are highly related to sea-ice fracture. Different rheology models have been successfully applied in various scenarios. However, most of the approaches adopted are based on continuum mechanics that do not explicitly model fracture processes. There are emerging needs for a more physically informed modelling methods that explicitly address fracture at the kilometre scale. In pursuing this objective, in this paper we explored the potential of applying a promising mesh free numerical method, peridynamics (PD), in modelling ice floe (~km) fractures. PD offers a physically and mathematically consistent theory through which spontaneous emergence and propagation of cracks can be achieved. The integral nature of the governing equations in PD remains valid even if a crack appears. We numerically investigated in this paper the tensile fracture (e.g. lead opening) of an elastic heterogenous ice floe. The modelling results were compared with published numerical results obtained by another numerical method. The potentials and challenges of PD in this application are discussed and summarized.
Q1

Impact of varying solar angles on Arctic iceberg area retrieval from Sentinel-2 near-infrared data
Fisser H., Doulgeris A.P., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Icebergs are part of the glacial mass balance and they interact with the ocean and with sea ice. Optical satellite remote sensing is often used to retrieve the above-waterline area of icebergs. However, varying solar angles introduce an error to the iceberg area retrieval that had not been quantified. Herein, we approximate the iceberg area error for top-of-atmosphere Sentinel-2 near-infrared data at a range of solar zenith angles. First, we calibrate an iceberg threshold at a
$56^\circ$
solar zenith angle with reference to higher resolution airborne imagery at Storfjorden, Svalbard. A reflectance threshold of 0.12 yields the lowest relative error of 0.19% ± 15.74% and the lowest interquartile spread. Second, we apply the 0.12 reflectance threshold to Sentinel-2 data at 14 solar zenith angles between
$45^\circ$
and
$81^\circ$
in the Kangerlussuaq Fjord, south-east Greenland. Here we quantify the error variation with the solar zenith angle for a consistent set of large icebergs. The error variation is then standardized to the error obtained in Svalbard. Up to a solar zenith angle of
$65^\circ$
, the mean standardized iceberg area error remains between 5.9% and −5.67%. Above
$65^\circ$
, iceberg areas are underestimated and inconsistent, caused by a segregation into shadows and sun-facing slopes.
Q1

Spatiotemporal mass balance variability of Jostedalsbreen ice cap, Norway, revealed by a temperature-index model with data assimilation
Sjursen K.H., Dunse T., Schuler T.V., Andreassen L.M., Åkesson H.
Abstract
Jostedalsbreen in western Norway is the mainland Europe's largest ice cap and a complex system of more than 80 glaciers. While observational records indicate a significant sensitivity to climate fluctuations, knowledge about ice-cap wide spatiotemporal mass changes and their drivers remain sparse. Here, we quantify the surface mass balance (SMB) of Jostedalsbreen from 1960 to 2020 using a temperature-index model within a Bayesian framework. We assimilate seasonal glaciological SMB to constrain accumulation and ablation, and geodetic mass balance to adjust model parameters for each glacier individually. Overall, we find that Jostedalsbreen has experienced a small mass loss of −0.07 m w.e. a−1 (−0.21 to +0.08 m w.e. a−1), but with substantial spatiotemporal variability. Our results suggest that winter SMB variations were the main control on annual SMB between 1960 and 2000, while increasingly negative summer SMB is responsible for substantial mass losses after 2000. Spatial variations in SMB between glaciers or regions of the ice cap are likely associated with local topography and its effect on orographic precipitation. We advocate for models to leverage the growing availability of observational resources to improve SMB predictions. We demonstrate an approach that incorporates complementary datasets, while addressing their inherent uncertainties, to constrain models and provide robust estimates of spatiotemporal SMB and associated uncertainties.
Q1

Open discussion at the IGS symposium on ‘The edges of glaciology’, 7 July 2023
Fowler A.C.
Abstract
There follows the open discussion which took place at the IGS symposium on ‘The Edges of Glaciology’, in July 2023. The discussion was curated by Doug Benn. The time of speaking in minutes and seconds into the Panopto recording is given in bold figures. The recording itself is provided as electronic supplementary material. It has been transcribed and edited by Andrew Fowler, with much (and much-needed) assistance from the participants. Footnotes (mostly references) are editorial intrusions.
Q1

U-net with ResNet-34 backbone for dual-polarized C-band baltic sea-ice SAR segmentation
Karvonen J.
Abstract
In this study, the U-net with ResNet-34, i.e. a residual neural network with 34 layers, backbone semantic segmentation network is applied to C-band sea-ice SAR imagery over the Baltic Sea. Sentinel-1 Extra Wide Swath mode HH/HV-polarized SAR data acquired during the winter season 2018–2019, and corresponding segments derived from the daily Baltic Sea ice charts were used for training the segmentation algorithm. C-band SAR image mosaics of the winter season 2020–2021 were then used to evaluate the segmentation. The major objective was to study the suitability of semantic segmentation of SAR imagery for automated SAR segmentation and also to find a potential replacement for the outdated iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm currently in operational use. The results compared to the daily Baltic Sea ice charts and the operational ICM segmentation and visual interpretation were encouraging from the operational point of view. Open water areas were located very well and the oversegmentation produced by ICM was significantly reduced. The correspondence between the ice chart polygons and the segmentation results was also reasonably good. Based on the results, the studied method is a potential candidate to replace the operational ICM SAR segmentation used in the Copernicus Marine Service automated sea-ice products at Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Q1

Comparing heterogeneity of sea ice models with Viscous-Plastic and Maxwell Elasto-Brittle rheology
Bourgett M., Losch M., Plante M.
Abstract
Classical sea-ice models in climate model resolution do not resolve the small-scale physics of sea ice. New methods to address this problem include modifications to established viscous-plastic (VP) rheology models, sub-gridscale parameterizations or new rheologies such as the Maxwell elasto-brittle (MEB) rheology. Here, we investigate differences in gridscale dynamics simulated by the VP and MEB models, their dependency on tunable model parameters and their response to added stochastic perturbations of material parameters in a new implementation in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model. Idealized simulations are used to demonstrate that material parameters can be tuned so that both VP and MEB rheologies lead to similar cohesive stress states, arching behaviour and heterogeneity in the deformation fields. As expected, simulations with MEB rheology generally show more heterogeneity than the VP model as measured by the number of simulated linear kinematic features (LKFs). For both rheologies, the cohesion determines the emergence of LKFs. Introducing gridscale heterogeneity by random model parameter perturbation, however, leads to a larger increase of LKF numbers in the VP simulations than in the MEB simulations and similar heterogeneity between VP and MEB models.
Q1

Impact of internal wave drag on Arctic sea ice
Flocco D., Feltham D., Schroeder D., Aksenov Y., Siahaan A., Tsamados M.
Abstract
A parameterization of the impact of internal waves on momentum transfer at the sea-ice–ocean interface based on previous work by McPhee has been implemented in a sea-ice model for the first time. The ice–ocean drag from internal waves is relevant for shallow mixed layer depth and the presence of a density jump at the pycnocline and is also a function of the strength of the stratification beneath the ocean mixed layer and geometry of the ice interface. We present results from a coupled sea-ice–ocean model where the parameterization of internal wave drag has been implemented. We conducted simulations spanning the years from 2000 to 2017. We find a deceleration of ice drift by 5–8% in both winter and summer, but with significant spatial and temporal variation reaching seasonal average values of ~10%. The spatial variation of ice transport leads to local impacts on deformed ice of magnitude ~0.05 m (2–5%), and reductions in ocean-to-ice heat fluxes of ~1 W m−2, and a decrease in bottom melt of ~0.02–0.04 cm d−1. There is an increase of up to 15% in thickness and ice concentration in the Canadian Arctic and a 10% overall impact on the total sea-ice volume.
Q1

A reassessment of ice cliff dynamics upon debris-covered glaciers
Evatt G.W., Mayer C., Wirbel A., Abrahams I.D., Nicholson L.
Abstract
We present a new model for understanding ice cliff dynamics within a debris-covered glacier ablation zone. This simple energy-balance model incorporates a moving frame of reference, made necessary by the melt of the surrounding debris-covered ice. In so doing, this also formalises how different types of field measurements can be utilised and compared. Our predictions include showing: ice cliffs can endogenously select their own slope angles; that there should be an indifference between illuminated north- and south-facing ice cliff slopes; that ice cliffs grow steeper with thicker debris layers; that ice cliffs cannot stably exist below a certain critical debris thickness and that some modelling of ice cliffs (when not incorporating the moving frame) may incorrectly estimate ice mass losses. All of our results are produced using parametrisations from Baltoro Glacier, Karakoram.
Q1

Deriving iceberg ablation rates using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES)
Schild K.M., Vaňková I., Sutherland D.A., Nicholls K.
Abstract
The increase in iceberg discharge into the polar oceans highlights the importance of understanding how quickly icebergs are deteriorating and where the resulting freshwater injection is occurring. Recent advances in quantifying iceberg deterioration through combinations of modeling, remote sensing and direct in situ measurements have successfully calculated overall ablation rates, and surface and sidewall ablation; however, in situ measurements of basal melt rates have been difficult to obtain. Radar has successfully measured iceberg thickness, but repeat measurements, which would capture a change in iceberg thickness with time, have not yet been collected. Here we test the applicability of using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES) to quantify basal ablation rates of a large (~800 m long) non-tabular Arctic iceberg during an intensive 2019 summer field campaign in Sermilik Fjord, southeast Greenland. We find that ApRES can be used to measure basal ablation even over a short deployment period (10 d), and also provide a lower bound on sidewall melt. This study fills a critical gap in iceberg research and pushes the limits of field instrumentation.
Q1

On sea ice emission modeling for MOSAiC's L-band radiometric measurements
Hernández-Macià F., Gabarró C., Huntemann M., Naderpour R., Johnson J.T., Jezek K.C.
Abstract
The retrieval of sea ice thickness using L-band passive remote sensing requires robust models for emission from sea ice. In this work, measurements obtained from surface-based radiometers during the MOSAiC expedition are assessed with the Burke, Wilheit and SMRT radiative transfer models. These models encompass distinct methodologies: radiative transfer with/without wave coherence effects, and with/without scattering. Before running these emission models, the sea ice growth is simulated using the Cumulative Freezing Degree Days (CFDD) model to further compute the evolution of the ice structure during each period. Ice coring profiles done near the instruments are used to obtain the initial state of the computation, along with Digital Thermistor Chain (DTC) data to derive the sea ice temperature during the analyzed periods. The results suggest that the coherent approach used in the Wilheit model results in a better agreement with the horizontal polarization of the in situ measured brightness temperature. The Burke and SMRT incoherent models offer a more robust fit for the vertical component. These models are almost equivalent since the scattering considered in SMRT can be safely neglected at this low frequency, but the Burke model misses an important contribution from the snow layer above sea ice. The results also suggest that a more realistic permittivity falls between the spheres and random needles formulations, with potential for refinement, particularly for L-band applications, through future field measurements.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
161 citations, 7.1%
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
99 citations, 4.36%
|
|
Musculoskeletal Care
47 citations, 2.07%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
44 citations, 1.94%
|
|
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
44 citations, 1.94%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
42 citations, 1.85%
|
|
Arthritis Care and Research
38 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Scientific Reports
34 citations, 1.5%
|
|
PLoS ONE
32 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
25 citations, 1.1%
|
|
BMJ Open
21 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Cureus
20 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Diagnostics
19 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Skeletal Radiology
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Cartilage
16 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
16 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
14 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Osteoarthritis Imaging
14 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Arthritis and Rheumatology
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
American Journal of Sports Medicine
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Life
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Cells
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
JOR Spine
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Nutrients
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Biomolecules
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Biomedicines
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Arthritis Research and Therapy
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Nature reviews. Rheumatology
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Current Rheumatology Reports
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Arthroplasty
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Heliyon
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Bone and Joint Research
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
RMD Open
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Animals
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinical Rheumatology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Healthcare
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Biomarker Research
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Disability and Rehabilitation
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Rheumatology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Bioengineering
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
ACR Open Rheumatology
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Bone Research
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
JAMA network open
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Clinical Biomechanics
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
F1000Research
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
BMC Primary Care
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pain
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Orthopaedics
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Lancet Rheumatology
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Bone and Joint Journal
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Medicina
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
BMC Veterinary Research
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ACS Omega
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Elsevier
633 citations, 27.9%
|
|
Springer Nature
394 citations, 17.36%
|
|
MDPI
270 citations, 11.9%
|
|
Wiley
240 citations, 10.58%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
91 citations, 4.01%
|
|
SAGE
76 citations, 3.35%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
49 citations, 2.16%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
49 citations, 2.16%
|
|
BMJ
48 citations, 2.12%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
40 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
35 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Oxford University Press
23 citations, 1.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
19 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
16 citations, 0.71%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
F1000 Research
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
American Physiological Society
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sports Physical Therapy Section
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IGI Global
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Portland Press
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American College of Physicians
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Australian Physiotherapy Association
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
ASME International
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Bioscientifica
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Rostov State Medical University
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Emerald
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Impact Journals
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Egyptian Society for Joint Diseases and Arthritis
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Neoplasia Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Nursing Science
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Medicine Publishing Company Ltd.
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Orthopaedic Association
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Medknow
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
IRBIS
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Kemerovo State Medical University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Synapse, LLC
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
SCEEMP
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
AOSIS
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Tech Science Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
SLACK
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
SMW Supporting Association
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Mediar Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (67 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Boston University
33 publications, 6.73%
|
|
Lund University
30 publications, 6.12%
|
|
Harvard University
23 publications, 4.69%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
21 publications, 4.29%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
19 publications, 3.88%
|
|
University of Toronto
18 publications, 3.67%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
18 publications, 3.67%
|
|
University of Sydney
17 publications, 3.47%
|
|
University of Oxford
15 publications, 3.06%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
13 publications, 2.65%
|
|
Monash University
13 publications, 2.65%
|
|
University of Melbourne
12 publications, 2.45%
|
|
Royal North Shore Hospital
12 publications, 2.45%
|
|
University of Oulu
11 publications, 2.24%
|
|
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
10 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Duke University
10 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of British Columbia
9 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Western University
9 publications, 1.84%
|
|
University of Oslo
8 publications, 1.63%
|
|
La Trobe University
8 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Tasmania
8 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
8 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Leeds
8 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Otago
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Curtin University
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Keele University
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
7 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Nottingham
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Southampton
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Paracelsus Medical University
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Iowa
6 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Northwestern University
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Arthritis and Rehabilitation
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Calgary
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
5 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Umeå University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Oulu University Hospital
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Bristol
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Florida
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Women's College Hospital
4 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Liège
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Basel
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Liverpool
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Newcastle University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Georgia State University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Wake Forest University
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Salford
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Singapore General Hospital
3 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Imperial College London
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Aalborg University Hospital
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Boston University
31 publications, 6.44%
|
|
Lund University
29 publications, 6.03%
|
|
Harvard University
22 publications, 4.57%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
20 publications, 4.16%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
18 publications, 3.74%
|
|
University of Sydney
17 publications, 3.53%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
17 publications, 3.53%
|
|
University of Toronto
16 publications, 3.33%
|
|
University of Oxford
15 publications, 3.12%
|
|
Monash University
13 publications, 2.7%
|
|
Royal North Shore Hospital
12 publications, 2.49%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
11 publications, 2.29%
|
|
University of Melbourne
11 publications, 2.29%
|
|
University of Oulu
10 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Duke University
10 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
9 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of British Columbia
9 publications, 1.87%
|
|
La Trobe University
8 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Tasmania
8 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Leeds
8 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Western University
8 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Oslo
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Otago
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Keele University
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
7 publications, 1.46%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Nottingham
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Southampton
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Curtin University
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University Hospital Erlangen
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Paracelsus Medical University
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Iowa
6 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Arthritis and Rehabilitation
5 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Calgary
5 publications, 1.04%
|
|
French Institute of Health and Medical Research
5 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Umeå University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Oulu University Hospital
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Northwestern University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Bristol
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Florida
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Women's College Hospital
4 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Australian National University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Basel
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Liverpool
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Newcastle University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Georgia State University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Wake Forest University
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Salford
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Singapore General Hospital
3 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Liège
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Imperial College London
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Aalborg University Hospital
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Balgrist University Hospital
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Kuopio University Hospital
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
2 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 112, 22.86%
USA
112 publications, 22.86%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 50, 10.2%
United Kingdom
50 publications, 10.2%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 42, 8.57%
Australia
42 publications, 8.57%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 39, 7.96%
Canada
39 publications, 7.96%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 35, 7.14%
Sweden
35 publications, 7.14%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 29, 5.92%
Netherlands
29 publications, 5.92%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 27, 5.51%
Germany
27 publications, 5.51%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 22, 4.49%
Denmark
22 publications, 4.49%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 18, 3.67%
Norway
18 publications, 3.67%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 14, 2.86%
Japan
14 publications, 2.86%
|
China
|
China, 11, 2.24%
China
11 publications, 2.24%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 2.24%
New Zealand
11 publications, 2.24%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 2.24%
Switzerland
11 publications, 2.24%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 2.04%
Finland
10 publications, 2.04%
|
France
|
France, 9, 1.84%
France
9 publications, 1.84%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 1.22%
Italy
6 publications, 1.22%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 1.02%
Austria
5 publications, 1.02%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 1.02%
Belgium
5 publications, 1.02%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 1.02%
Spain
5 publications, 1.02%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 0.82%
Brazil
4 publications, 0.82%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.82%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.82%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.61%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.61%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.41%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.41%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.41%
Poland
2 publications, 0.41%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.2%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.2%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.2%
Greece
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.2%
Israel
1 publication, 0.2%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.2%
India
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.2%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.2%
Oman
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.2%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.2%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.2%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 107, 22.25%
USA
107 publications, 22.25%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 49, 10.19%
United Kingdom
49 publications, 10.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 41, 8.52%
Australia
41 publications, 8.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 34, 7.07%
Canada
34 publications, 7.07%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 34, 7.07%
Sweden
34 publications, 7.07%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 28, 5.82%
Netherlands
28 publications, 5.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 24, 4.99%
Germany
24 publications, 4.99%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 20, 4.16%
Denmark
20 publications, 4.16%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 17, 3.53%
Norway
17 publications, 3.53%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 2.7%
Japan
13 publications, 2.7%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 2.29%
New Zealand
11 publications, 2.29%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 2.29%
Switzerland
11 publications, 2.29%
|
China
|
China, 10, 2.08%
China
10 publications, 2.08%
|
France
|
France, 9, 1.87%
France
9 publications, 1.87%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 1.87%
Finland
9 publications, 1.87%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 6, 1.25%
Italy
6 publications, 1.25%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 1.04%
Austria
5 publications, 1.04%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.83%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.83%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 0.83%
Spain
4 publications, 0.83%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.83%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.83%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.62%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.62%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.62%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.42%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.42%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.42%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.42%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.21%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.21%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.21%
Greece
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.21%
Israel
1 publication, 0.21%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.21%
India
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.21%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.21%
Oman
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.21%
Poland
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.21%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.21%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.21%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.21%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|