Knowledge Engineering Review
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.8
SJR
0.769
CiteScore
6.9
Categories
Artificial Intelligence
Software
Areas
Computer Science
Years of issue
1984, 1987-2025
journal names
Knowledge Engineering Review
KNOWL ENG REV
Top-3 citing journals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(3312 citations)

Expert Systems with Applications
(336 citations)

Knowledge Engineering Review
(311 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center
(44 publications)

University of Edinburgh
(43 publications)

University of Liverpool
(25 publications)

Griffith University
(5 publications)

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
(3 publications)

National Taiwan Normal University
(3 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 311
Q1

Wearable Sensors Based on Stretchable Organic Transistors
Liu Y., Ji D.
ABSTRACTOrganic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) hold potential for in‐sensor computing and wearable healthcare systems. Nevertheless, their inherent limitations in stretchability and conformability hinder their scalability and practical deployment. In a recent study, Liu et al. introduce a wearable in‐sensor computing platform that leverages stretchable OECTs, exhibiting over 50% elongation capability while preserving stable operational performance. This innovation enables the development of wearable systems that can accurately acquire biosignals.
Q1

Modulating Oxygen Affinity to Enhance Liquid Products for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Monoxide
Chen J., Arce‐Ramos J.M., Katsounaros I., de Smit E., Abubakar S.M., Lum Y., Zhang J., Wang L.
ABSTRACTElectrocatalytic CO reduction (COR) offers a promising alternative approach for synthesizing valuable chemicals, potentially at a lower carbon intensity as compared to conventional chemical production. Cu‐based catalysts have shown encouraging selectivity and activity toward multi‐carbon (C2+) products, albeit typically in the form of a mixture. Steering COR selectivity toward specific types of C2+ products, such as liquid products with high energy density, remains a challenge. In this study, we developed a Cu/Zn bimetallic catalyst composite and demonstrated enhanced selectivity toward liquid products as compared to reference CuO and Cu‐based catalysts, approaching 60% at a high current density of 300 mA/cm2. Our investigation highlights that the introduction of Zn promoted the emergence of a Cu/Zn heterojunction interface during COR. Density functional theory simulations were used to rationalize the observed differences in selectivity, revealing that interface plays a crucial role in diminishing the oxygen adsorption at the Cu‐sites and modifying the adsorption energy of COR reaction intermediates, consequently leading to enhanced selectivity toward liquid products.
Q1

Preparation, Rheological Behavior, and Redispersibility of Bamboo‐Derived Holocellulose Nanofibers
Yin C., Wang X., Han Z., Yang H., Yang K., Zheng W., Guan Q., Yu S.
ABSTRACTWith the demand for sustainable preparation of nanocellulose, the extraction of holocellulose nanofibers with surface‐coated hemicellulose from various biomass is drawing more and more attention. However, detailed preparation processes and some fundamental properties of holocellulose nanofibers, such as rheological behavior and redispersibility, still need systematic investigation. An in‐depth understanding of these processes and properties plays a crucial role in guiding the preparation and subsequent material design of holocellulose nanofibers. Herein, a concise method is reported to prepare bamboo‐derived holocellulose nanofibers (BHCNFs) from bamboo residue and has been characterized in detail. To facilitate subsequent application, comprehensive exploration and understanding of the rheological behavior of BHCNF were conducted, along with an investigation into the redispersibility after freeze‐drying. The presence of hemicellulose significantly affects the rheological behavior and gives BHCNF a certain redispersibility. To achieve better redispersibility, aerogel powder was prepared via spray freeze‐drying, offering new insights into the drying and practical application of BHCNF.
Q1

Terminal Passivation–Induced Interface Decoupling for High‐Stability Two‐Dimensional Semiconductors
He J., Yan J., Xue T., Yuan L., Hu Y., Wang Z., Chen X., Huang Y., Han C., Li L., Hu W.
ABSTRACTTwo‐dimensional (2D) materials, such as MoS2, show exceptional potential for next‐generation electronics. However, the poor stability of these materials, particularly under long‐term operations and high temperature, impedes their practical applications. Here, we develop a terminal passivation interface decoupling (TPID) strategy to significantly improve the stability of MoS2, by mitigating the interaction between the substrate and the 2D material within the in‐situ growth process. Specifically, the strong electron‐withdrawing terminal group hydroxyl, prevalent on the oxide substrate, is passivated by carbon groups. Due to this, the structure of MoS2 materials remains stable during long‐term storage, and its electronic devices, field‐effect transistors (FETs), show remarkable operational and high‐temperature (400°C) stability over 60 days, with much‐improved performance. For example, mobility increases from 9.69 to 85 cm2/(V·s), the highest value for bottom‐up transfer‐free single crystal MoS2 FETs. This work provides a new avenue to solve reliability issues of 2D materials and devices, laying a foundation for their applications in the electronic industry.
Q1

High‐Performance Stable Hybrid Inorganic‐Organic Light‐Emitting Transistor
Huang H., Miao Z., Gao H., Cao J., Zheng Y., Gao C., Li X., Yuan G., Dong H.
ABSTRACTLight‐emitting transistors (LETs) as novel integrated optoelectronic devices demonstrate great potential applications in smart displays and visual intelligent perception. The construction of high‐performance area‐emission LETs with low power consumption and good reliability is urgently needed for advancing their applications, however, this integration has not been realized within a single device. Herein, we demonstrate a kind of planar‐driven hybrid LET (PDHLET) that makes use of the unique advantages of high mobility and stability of inorganic and organic semiconductors in the same device. By incorporating an indium‐zinc‐gallium‐oxide (InZnGeO) conducting layer and organic emissive layer, a high‐performance stable blue‐emissive PDHLET is constructed, giving a high Ion/Ioff ratio approaching 6.1 × 108 and a low Von of 5.5 V along with maximum brightness of 1264 cd/m2 as well as small VTH shift of 0.5 V after 1000 s positive stress bias. Finally, a systematic simulation, including charge concentration and Langevin recombination rate, is carried out on PDHLET for the first time, demonstrating good consistency with experimental results. This confirms the uniformity of high redistributed charge concentration in the InZnGeO conducting layer which thus enables good area emission. This study provides a new avenue for constructing high‐performance stable LETs to advance various field applications.
Q1

Mechanistic Insights and Advances in Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces for Efficient Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2 Products
Chen J., Xiao Y., Da Y., Chen G., Sun Y., Wang L., Zhang J., Chen W.
ABSTRACTElectrocatalytic CO2 reduction (ECR) is a promising approach to converting CO2 into chemicals and fuels. Among the ECR products, C2 products such as ethylene, ethanol, and acetate have been extensively studied due to their high industrial demands. However, the mechanistic understanding of C2 product formation remains unclear due to the lack of in situ or operando measurements that can observe the complex and instantaneous atomic evolutions of adsorbates at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Moreover, the sensitivity of ECR reactions to variations at the interface further widens the gap between mechanistic understanding and performance enhancement. To bridge this gap, first‐principle studies provide insights into how the interface influences ECR. In this study, we present a review of mechanistic studies investigating the effects of various factors at the interface, with an emphasis on the C2 product formation. We begin by introducing ECR and the essential metrics. Next, we discuss the factors classified by their components at the interface, namely, electrocatalyst, electrolyte, and adsorbates, respectively, and their effects on the C2 product formation. Due to the interplay among these factors, we aim to deconvolute the influence of each factor and clearly demonstrate their impacts. Finally, we outline the promising directions for mechanistic studies of C2 products.
Q1

Outside Front Cover: Volume 6 Issue 1
Yan Z., Cheng Q., Sun M., Wu B., Zhu Y., Tong Z., Li M., Jia C., Zhao P.
Q1

Outside Back Cover: Volume 6 Issue 1
Xie C., Qiu H., Liu L., You Y., Li H., Li Y., Sun Z., Lin J., An L.
Q1

Unveiling the Interfacial Properties of Organic Single‐Crystal Hole‐Transporting Layers for High‐Performance Light‐Emitting Devices
Ye G., Li S., Ding R., Guo R., Zhang H., Liu Z., Yang F., Sun L., Li Y., Du X., Wang X., Wang L., Liu Y., Fang H., Liu Y., et. al.
ABSTRACTOrganic single crystals with long‐range molecular periodic ordering ensure superior charge‐transport properties and low defect density, which have been considered promising candidates for charge‐transporting materials in organic light‐emitting devices (OLEDs). The functional interfaces of OLEDs play a critical role in charge‐transporting and light‐emitting behaviors, while the interfacial properties of organic single crystals in OLEDs and their impact on device performance have been rarely investigated. Herein, two typical organic single crystals, 1,4‐bis(4‐Methylstyryl)benzene (BSB‐Me) and 2,6‐diphenylanthracene (DPA) with different molecular formulas and packing structures, are introduced as the single‐crystal hole‐transporting layers (HTLs) for a systematic investigation of the interfacial properties between single‐crystal HTLs and active emissive layers. BSB‐Me single‐crystal HTLs offer satisfied surface wettability and enhanced interfacial interaction, which dominate the charge‐transporting and light‐emitting behaviors of the OLEDs. Such improved interfacial properties are responsible for the superior light out‐coupling efficiency of BSB‐Me single‐crystal OLEDs with efficient exciton recombination and minimal Joule heat loss. In consequence, BSB‐Me single‐crystal OLEDs exhibit a maximum luminance of 50,170 cd/m2 and a peak EQE of 8.78%, which are better than DPA‐based devices. Furthermore, BSB‐Me single‐crystal HTLs with favorable interfacial properties enable large‐area OLEDs with uniform EL emission over the whole light‐emitting area of 1 mm × 1 mm.
Q1

A Highly Ductile Composite of 3D‐Printed Poly(Lactic Acid) With InSe Particles and Flakes as a Filler
Li H., Yu Z., Liu B., Gao Y., Liu M., Zhang J., Ruoff R.S., Wang B.
ABSTRACTThe biodegradable polymer poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is brittle. PLA‐based composites reinforced by indium selenide (InSe) particles or flakes are prepared; each is found to have outstanding plasticity. InSe nanosheets are prepared by sonication of solid InSe in N‐methyl pyrrolidone, followed by washing/dispersion in ethanol, and subsequent drying. These InSe nanosheets, or in separate studies InSe particles, are mixed with PLA to make composite materials. The PLA composite materials are 3D‐printed into “dogbone” samples that are tensile‐loaded. The optimum dogbone specimen is 1.5 times stronger and 5.5 times tougher than neat PLA specimens prepared in the same way. To the best of our knowledge, this concurrent improvement in tensile strength and toughness has not been achieved before in PLA with any filler type. Finite element analysis, together with experimental analysis of (i) fracture surfaces, (ii) the PLA crystal structure, and (iii) the internal structure by micro‐CT scanning, suggests that the exceptional mechanical performance is due to the intrinsic properties of InSe and, particularly, the emergence of crack shielding and crack deflection at the interfaces of PLA and InSe flakes. These findings indicate that PLA–InSe composites may offer opportunities to broaden the applications of PLA composites, including as load‐bearing materials.
Q1

Functional Injectable Hydrogel for Bone Regeneration: Regulation of the circSRPK1/miR‐320a Axis and Targeting Multiple Osteogenic Pathways via CDH2 and Osterix Genes
Wang Y., Mao X., Li D., Zhao Y., Yang X., Zheng Z., Liu X., Lv Z., Cai X., Weng X., Zhang H., Feng B.
ABSTRACTHydrogels loaded with microRNA (miRNA) have shown promise in bone‐defect repair. Here, we present the first report of miRNA‐loaded hydrogels containing bioactivities to treat steroid‐induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH), based on the mechanism of competing endogenous RNAs. Transcriptome sequencing of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMSCs) extracted from the proximal femoral bone marrow and subsequent functional assays revealed that the circSRPK1/miR‐320a axis promotes HBMSCs osteogenic differentiation. By incorporating antagomir‐320a (a miR‐320a inhibitor) encapsulated in liposomes into injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels, we constructed an injectable hydrogel, HA@antagomir‐320a. This hydrogel demonstrated exceptional osteogenic properties, targeting multiple osteogenic pathways via CDH2 and Osterix and exhibited excellent in vitro biocompatibility. In vivo, it substantially enhanced bone formation in the osteonecrotic area of the femoral head. This injectable HA@antagomir‐320a hydrogel, which exhibited exceptional biocompatibility and osteogenic properties in vivo and in vitro, offers a promising and minimally invasive solution for the treatment of SONFH.
Q1

Engineering Metal Nanoclusters at the Atomic Level for Effective Electrocatalysis
Mu C., Liu Z., Yao Q., He Q., Xie J.
ABSTRACTWith the advances of nanochemistry in the past several decades, a diverse set of nanomaterials has been developed as electrocatalysts with enhanced activity, selectivity, and durability for electrocatalytic reactions. However, it has remained as a long challenge to systematically understand the mechanism of electrocatalytic reactions, which involves multiple protons‐coupled electron transfer processes and varied products at the atomic level, intrinsically because of the complexity and polydispersity of the traditional nanomaterials. By sharp contrast, ligand‐protected metal nanoclusters (NCs) possess atomically precise structures and abundant active sites, facilitating their applications as effective model electrocatalysts for revealing the mechanism of electrocatalytic reactions. This review summarizes recent progress in atom‐level engineering of metal NCs as model catalysts for electrocatalytic reactions. Specifically, we first discuss the effects of metal composition engineering, including doping and size effects, on the electrocatalytic performance of metal NCs. Then similar electrocatalytic discussion extends to ligand effects of metal NCs, where ligand type and coverage engineering are deciphered. Moreover, we discuss how the overall charge and morphology of NCs modify their electrocatalytic performance. The fundamental and methodological insights summarized in this review should serve as useful references guiding the future development of effective metal electrocatalysts in diverse sectors of industry.
Q1

Machine Learning Approaches in Polymer Science: Progress and Fundamental for a New Paradigm
Xie C., Qiu H., Liu L., You Y., Li H., Li Y., Sun Z., Lin J., An L.
ABSTRACTMachine learning (ML), material genome, and big data approaches are highly overlapped in their strategies, algorithms, and models. They can target various definitions, distributions, and correlations of concerned physical parameters in given polymer systems, and have expanding applications as a new paradigm indispensable to conventional ones. Their inherent advantages in building quantitative multivariate correlations have largely enhanced the capability of scientific understanding and discoveries, thus facilitating mechanism exploration, target prediction, high‐throughput screening, optimization, and rational and inverse designs. This article summarizes representative progress in the recent two decades focusing on the design, preparation, application, and sustainable development of polymer materials based on the exploration of key physical parameters in the composition–process–structure–property–performance relationship. The integration of both data‐driven and physical insights through ML approaches to deepen fundamental understanding and discover novel polymer materials is categorically presented. Despite the construction and application of robust ML models, strategies and algorithms to deal with variant tasks in polymer science are still in rapid growth. The challenges and prospects are then presented. We believe that the innovation in polymer materials will thrive along the development of ML approaches, from efficient design to sustainable applications.
Q1

Metal–Organic Frameworks Coordination‐Oriented Polymer Dielectrics for Neuromorphic Vision Sensors
Zhu D., Du J., Peng Z., Wang J., He X., Li G., Ye L., Ling H., Zhao M., Lin H., Ji D., Hu W.
ABSTRACTInterface engineering based on polymer dielectrics shows great promise in organic field‐effect transistors (OFETs)‐based neuromorphic vision sensors (NeuVS). However, the highly disordered chain arrangement of polymer dielectrics often has a negative impact on the dynamic behavior of charge carriers, thereby affecting the sensing, memory, and computing performance of devices. To this end, we report an effective strategy to improve the orientation of polymer dielectrics by using a coordination combination of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and polymer. As a result, the coordination of MOFs with polymers improves the polarization of hydroxyl (−OH) and the resulting interfacial dipole could achieve an increase of photogenerated carriers in NeuVS with both higher mobility (above 20 cm2/(V ∙ s)) and better optical figures of merit than devices without the coordination of MOFs. Furthermore, the new MOFs‐polymer dielectric gives NeuVS devices temporal dynamics that enable better color extraction in static images. More importantly, in‐sensor perception of moving objects was simulated, allowing postprocessing to produce over 95% action recognition accuracy. This attempt provides a new idea for the development of dielectric materials for highly sensitive light detection and visuomorphic computing.
Q1

Deep Learning‐Assisted Electronic Skin System Capable of Capturing Spatiotemporal and Mechanical Features of Social Touch to Enhance Human–Robot Emotion Recognition
Huang J., Sun Y., Jiang Y., Li J., Sun X., Cao X., Zheng Y., Pan L., Shi Y.
ABSTRACTIn human interactions, social touch communication is widely used to convey emotions, emphasizing its critical role in advancing human–robot interactions by enabling robots to understand and respond to human emotions, thereby significantly enhancing their service capabilities. However, the challenge is to dynamically capture social touch with sufficient spatiotemporal and mechanical resolution for deep haptic data analysis. This study presents a robotic system with flexible electronic skin and a high‐frequency signal circuit, utilizing deep neural networks to recognize social touch emotions. The electronic skin, made from double cross‐linked ionogels and microstructured arrays, has a low force detection threshold (8 Pa) and a wide perception range (0–150 kPa), enhancing the mechanical resolution of touch signals. By incorporating a high‐speed readout circuit capable of capturing spatiotemporal features of social touch gesture information at 30 Hz, the system facilitates precise analysis of touch interactions. A 3D convolutional neural network with a Squeeze‐and‐Excitation Attention module achieves 87.12% accuracy in recognizing social touch gestures, improving the understanding of emotions conveyed through touch. The effectiveness of the system is validated through interactive demonstrations with robotic dogs and humanoid robots, demonstrating its potential to enhance the emotional intelligence of robots.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
3312 citations, 12.44%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
336 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Knowledge Engineering Review
311 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
303 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
217 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Knowledge-Based Systems
197 citations, 0.74%
|
|
IEEE Access
186 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
181 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence
164 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
148 citations, 0.56%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
134 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
117 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
113 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
106 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
98 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Sensors
87 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Computers in Industry
86 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
82 citations, 0.31%
|
|
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
81 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Review
77 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
76 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Information Sciences
75 citations, 0.28%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
71 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Data and Knowledge Engineering
65 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Applied Intelligence
65 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Argument and Computation
65 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
65 citations, 0.24%
|
|
ACM Computing Surveys
64 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Knowledge and Information Systems
59 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Automation in Construction
53 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Informatics
53 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Web Semantics
52 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
52 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Decision Support Systems
51 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
50 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Neurocomputing
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Expert Systems
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Human Computer Studies
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sustainability
47 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Dynamics and Terminology
46 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
41 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
39 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
36 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Systems and Software
36 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Future Generation Computer Systems
36 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Logic and Computation
36 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Information Science
35 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pervasive and Mobile Computing
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science of Computer Programming
34 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
PLoS ONE
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Information Systems
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and Law
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IEEE Intelligent Systems
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM
29 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Computers and Chemical Engineering
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Soft Computing
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Information and Software Technology
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Applied Artificial Intelligence
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Computational Intelligence
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Information (Switzerland)
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Semantic Web
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Applied Ontology
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Machine Learning
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Information Processing and Management
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
New Generation Computing
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AI Communications
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Energies
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Information Fusion
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Mathematics
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Pattern Recognition
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AI and Society
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans
18 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Entropy
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Springer Nature
7540 citations, 28.31%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5281 citations, 19.83%
|
|
Elsevier
4275 citations, 16.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1122 citations, 4.21%
|
|
MDPI
754 citations, 2.83%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
719 citations, 2.7%
|
|
IGI Global
696 citations, 2.61%
|
|
Wiley
666 citations, 2.5%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
485 citations, 1.82%
|
|
SAGE
274 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Emerald
268 citations, 1.01%
|
|
World Scientific
215 citations, 0.81%
|
|
IOS Press
190 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
153 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Oxford University Press
147 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
136 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
90 citations, 0.34%
|
|
IOP Publishing
84 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
82 citations, 0.31%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
78 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
68 citations, 0.26%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
54 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
51 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
JMIR Publications
42 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ASME International
40 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
32 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AIP Publishing
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
EDP Sciences
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
20 citations, 0.08%
|
|
MIT Press
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
PeerJ
15 citations, 0.06%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Science Alert
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Royal Society
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Academy Publishing (IAP)
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science, eptcs
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SciELO
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Accounting Association
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Wuhan University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CAIRN
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASTES Journal
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Copernicus
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science in China Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Alexandria University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Allerton Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASTM International
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
New Technologies Publishing House
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
SAE International
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Duke University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Suceava
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lavoisier
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EPI SCP
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korea Information Processing Society (KIPS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center
44 publications, 3.93%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
43 publications, 3.84%
|
|
University of Liverpool
25 publications, 2.23%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
24 publications, 2.14%
|
|
University College London
21 publications, 1.88%
|
|
University of Southampton
20 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Imperial College London
15 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Bologna
13 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
12 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Utrecht University
12 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Warwick
11 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
11 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
10 publications, 0.89%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
10 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
10 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
10 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of York
10 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Griffith University
9 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Stanford University
9 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Robert Gordon University
8 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
8 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
8 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University College Dublin
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Essex
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Salford
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Linköping University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Birmingham
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Charles University
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Westminster
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Oxford
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Cambridge
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
City, University of London
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Otago
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bristol
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Manitoba
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Ames Research Center
5 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Dundee
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
King's College London
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Trento
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Melbourne
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
La Trobe University
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Waterloo
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Granada
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Catalonia
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Université Paris Dauphine-PSL
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Surrey
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Ulster
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ege University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Twente
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Lisbon
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Milan
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Drexel University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Pisa
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Auckland
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Washington State University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Washington
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Aegean University
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Leeds
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Griffith University
5 publications, 7.25%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
University of Tehran
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
University of Oxford
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
University of Trieste
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Wright State University
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
University of the West of Scotland
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Malaysia Kelantan
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Umeå University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Nantes
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Lebanese University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Imperial College London
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
City, University of London
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
North Minzu University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Brescia
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Federation University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Central Florida
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
FORTH Institute of Computer Science
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Bamberg
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Bremen
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Vienna University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Kansas State University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Osaka Institute of Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Federal University of ABC
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Salamanca
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Sfax
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Granada
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Regis University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Manouba University
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
DeepMind
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University College Dublin
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
Show all (41 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 344, 30.71%
United Kingdom
344 publications, 30.71%
|
USA
|
USA, 209, 18.66%
USA
209 publications, 18.66%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 66, 5.89%
Italy
66 publications, 5.89%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 64, 5.71%
Spain
64 publications, 5.71%
|
France
|
France, 58, 5.18%
France
58 publications, 5.18%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 40, 3.57%
Netherlands
40 publications, 3.57%
|
China
|
China, 39, 3.48%
China
39 publications, 3.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 39, 3.48%
Canada
39 publications, 3.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 36, 3.21%
Germany
36 publications, 3.21%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 36, 3.21%
Australia
36 publications, 3.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 21, 1.88%
Belgium
21 publications, 1.88%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 21, 1.88%
Brazil
21 publications, 1.88%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 21, 1.88%
Ireland
21 publications, 1.88%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 19, 1.7%
Greece
19 publications, 1.7%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 18, 1.61%
Sweden
18 publications, 1.61%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 12, 1.07%
Turkey
12 publications, 1.07%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 11, 0.98%
Norway
11 publications, 0.98%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 11, 0.98%
Czech Republic
11 publications, 0.98%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 10, 0.89%
Switzerland
10 publications, 0.89%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 0.8%
Iran
9 publications, 0.8%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 9, 0.8%
New Zealand
9 publications, 0.8%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 0.71%
Austria
8 publications, 0.71%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 8, 0.71%
Argentina
8 publications, 0.71%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 7, 0.63%
Portugal
7 publications, 0.63%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 0.63%
Japan
7 publications, 0.63%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.54%
Poland
6 publications, 0.54%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.54%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.54%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 0.45%
Mexico
5 publications, 0.45%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.36%
UAE
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 4, 0.36%
Pakistan
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.36%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.36%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.27%
Russia
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.27%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.27%
Israel
3 publications, 0.27%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.27%
India
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.27%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.27%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.27%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.27%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.18%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.18%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.18%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.18%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.18%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.18%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.09%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.09%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.09%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.09%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.09%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.09%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.09%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.09%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.09%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Chad
|
Chad, 1, 0.09%
Chad
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.09%
Chile
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.09%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 1, 0.09%
Yugoslavia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 1, 0.09%
Czechoslovakia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (27 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Australia
|
Australia, 11, 15.94%
Australia
11 publications, 15.94%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 14.49%
United Kingdom
10 publications, 14.49%
|
USA
|
USA, 9, 13.04%
USA
9 publications, 13.04%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 8, 11.59%
Brazil
8 publications, 11.59%
|
France
|
France, 5, 7.25%
France
5 publications, 7.25%
|
China
|
China, 5, 7.25%
China
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 7.25%
Ireland
5 publications, 7.25%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 5.8%
Greece
4 publications, 5.8%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 5.8%
Italy
4 publications, 5.8%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 4.35%
Germany
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 4.35%
Belgium
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 4.35%
Spain
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 4.35%
Canada
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 4.35%
Norway
3 publications, 4.35%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 2.9%
Portugal
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 2.9%
Iran
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 2.9%
Netherlands
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 2.9%
Tunisia
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 2.9%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 2.9%
Sweden
2 publications, 2.9%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 1.45%
Austria
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 1.45%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 1.45%
Lebanon
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 1.45%
Malaysia
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 1.45%
Mexico
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 1.45%
Singapore
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 1.45%
Fiji
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Chad
|
Chad, 1, 1.45%
Chad
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 1.45%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 1.45%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 1.45%
Japan
1 publication, 1.45%
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
4 profile journal articles
Saffiotti Alessandro
123 publications,
3 005 citations
h-index: 30
2 profile journal articles
Francisco Javier
46 publications,
615 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Villaret Mateu
68 publications,
338 citations
h-index: 9