Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.7
SJR
0.812
CiteScore
2.7
Categories
Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Applied Mathematics
Areas
Mathematics
Years of issue
2006-2025
journal names
Collectanea Mathematica
COLLECT MATH
Top-3 citing journals

Collectanea Mathematica
(77 citations)

Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
(76 citations)

Journal of Algebra
(67 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Genoa
(11 publications)

Beijing Normal University
(10 publications)

University of Milan
(9 publications)

Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
(5 publications)

Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
(5 publications)

Osaka University
(5 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 464
Q3

A Novel Scale to Measure Nursing Students’ Fear of Artificial Intelligence: Development and Validation
Albikawi Z., Abuadas M.
Background
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is revolutionizing patient care and clinical practice, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. However, it has also sparked concerns among nursing students about job displacement, reliance on technology, and the potential loss of human qualities like empathy and compassion, to this date, there is no established scale measuring the level of fear, especially among nursing students.
Aim
To develop and validate a scale to assess nursing students' fear of artificial intelligence.
Methods
The current study employed a cross-sectional design, involving a total of 225 Saudi nursing students enrolled in a nursing college. The scale's construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results
A comprehensive review of the literature addressing fear of AI guided the development of the Fear Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (FtAIS). An initial pool of items was subjected to a content validity assessment by an expert panel, which refined the scale to 10 items categorized into two dimensions: job issues and humanity. The two-factor structure was responsible for 73.52% of the total variance. The scale items' reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.803. The reliability coefficients for the two subscales, job issues, and humanity, are 0.804 and 0.801, respectively. The confirmatory factor model demonstrated a good model fit. The scale's convergent and discriminant validity were both confirmed.
Conclusion
The FtAIS is a rigorously developed and validated tool for measuring nursing students' fears toward AI. These findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and training programs that could mitigate AI-related fears and prepare nursing students for its integration into healthcare. The scale offers practical applications for educators and policymakers in addressing AI fear and fostering its confident adoption to enhance patient care and healthcare outcomes.
Q3

Educational Content Focusing on Basic Skills for Novice Nurses to Work Independently in Intensive Care Units in Japan: A Qualitative Study
Imamura S., Tsujimoto T., Fujii M., Takeshita Y., Nagayasu M., Inoue T.
Introduction/Objectives
In Japan, novice nurses are assigned to intensive care units immediately after graduation and are expected to become independent within about a year. Therefore, in addition to long-term, comprehensive educational programs, establishing an educational system that allows novice nurses to learn intensive care unit nursing while working is necessary. This study explored senior nurses’ expectations for novice nurses working independently in the intensive care unit after one year and identified the foundational skills needed for novice nurses to achieve this independence.
Methods
The research collaborators were eight senior nurses working in the intensive care unit of an acute care hospital. They were recruited from four facilities and had five or more years of clinical experience. The study used semi-structured interviews to generate data about the reports, contacts, and consultations they would expect from novice nurses to determine their readiness to become independent.
Results
This study clarified the circumstances under which novice nurses with no practical experience should voluntarily seek support to work as independent nurses one year after being assigned to an intensive care unit. It reflects the characteristics of patients who require intensive management, such as “assistance with central line insertion and removal” and “evaluation of vital signs,” as well as other advanced procedures.
Conclusion
This study clarified the basic skills required for novice nurses and identified the areas in which they should seek support. In the future, this method may be utilized in the early stages of novice nurse education.
Q3

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Resilience Training among Nursing Professionals in Saudi Arabia
Alanazi H.Q., Alreshidi N.M., Alrimali A.M., Alshammari W.D., Elsharif N.E., Teodosio M.T., Gonzales K.A., Gaspar F.B., Tabungar D.M., Alshammri M.A.
Introduction
Nursing is a demanding profession that calls for resilience and stress management. Nevertheless, many nurses do not receive adequate training in these areas. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of resilience training programs on work-related stress and resilience levels among nurses in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A quasi-experiment intervention study employing pre- and post-test approaches was conducted from January to March, 2024, to assess a resilience training program for nurses in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Fifty nurses from sixteen hospitals were divided into two groups in the stratified random sample: the intervention group (n = 25) and the control group (n = 25). Data was collected using an online survey at baseline and three months post-training, with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale employed for measuring outcomes. The paired samples t-tests for statistical analysis were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.
Results
Significant improvements were noted in the intervention group, with resilience sores improving to 79.50 from 77.12 (p = 0.015) and stress levels decreasing to 63.54 from 65.08 (p = 0.020). No significant changes were noted in the control group.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that resilience training programs can significantly enhance resilience levels and reduce work-related stress. These results underscore the importance of implementing structured resilience training to better equip nurses for the challenges of their demanding profession.
Q3

Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison between Automatic and Conventional Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults with Hypertension
Curi-Curi P.J., Santiago-González N., Valencia-Ledezma O.E., García-Rascon R., Hernandez-Roque E., Oliver-Flores E.Y., Curiel-Ramirez G.
Background
Blood pressure measurement is a main clinical procedure used for the detection of Systemic Arterial Hypertension. Mercury sphygmomanometer, in combination with auscultation technique, is still recognized as the gold standard for non-invasive blood pressure measurement.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy between automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices versus mercury sphygmomanometers in hospitalized patients.
Methods
A prospective, analytical and cross-sectional diagnostic method study was designed to compare the concordance, positive and negative predictive value, the sensitivity and specificity of automatic non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The devices were divided into two groups: the reference standard which was mercury sphygmomanometer (n=150), versus the index tests, that were wrist device (n=150), semi-automatic sphygmomanometer (n=150) and vital signs monitor (n=150).
Results
The monitor detected more cases (69%) of systemic arterial hypertension (p 0.0019, OR 5.3). The semiautomatic sphygmomanometer identified more true positives (n=22) and true negatives (n=113). It also showed a higher diagnostic accuracy: 67% sensitivity (p 0.0576, OR 0.5) and 97% specificity (p 0.088, OR 3.2). A mean arterial pressure variation <5mmHg of 65% was found with the semiautomatic sphygmomanometer (p <0.0001, OR 0.02) and 61% with the vital signs monitor (p <0.0001, OR 0.12). Best concordance of blood pressure between reference standard versus index test was obtained in the following order: Semi-automatic sphygmomanometer, Vital signs monitor, and Wrist device.
Conclusion
The use of vital signs monitor to measure blood pressure is recommended in all patients, although semiautomatic sphygmomanometer is more sensitive for the detection of systemic arterial hypertension.
Q3

Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania
Shayo P.M., Zewdie E.A., Byashalira K.C., Chamba N.G., Mbelele P.M., Bygbjerg I.C., Lillebaek T., Christensen D.L., Heysell S.K., Mpagama S.G.
Background
Managing tuberculosis (TB) patients with comorbidities requires a holistic and patient-centered approach. This study evaluated patient-centered care (PCC) experiences among TB patients with multimorbidity under the Adaptive Diseases Control Expert Program in Tanzania (ADEPT), with a focus on the TB/diabetes mellitus (DM) co-epidemic targeted by the program.
Methods
A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted involving TB patients with associated comorbidities receiving care from nurses trained in PCC through the ADEPT program. Patients were assessed for their interpretation of how they received PCC across eight dimensions of care.
Results
All 39 participants with TB had at least one comorbidity (100%). The most common multi-morbidities were TB/HIV (59.0%) and TB/DM (12.8%). Evaluation of needs, values, and preferences revealed that participants strongly felt healthcare workers considered these aspects (mean score = 4.53; scale 1 minimum- strongly disagree to 5 maximum- strongly agree). Subsequent analysis showed varying evaluations across dimensions. Patients reported robust endorsement for receiving care that involved family and friends, with mean scores of 4.04, and for access to care, with a mean score of 4.40. However, physical comfort, coordination, continuity of care, education and emotional support received comparatively lower rankings.
Conclusion
TB patients with multimorbidity under the ADEPT program experienced PCC. However, certain systemic issues such as physical spaces, coordination, transition of care, and information education did not meet patient’s needs in their own assessment, indicating opportunities for further quality improvement. Scaling up the ADEPT program within healthcare systems is likely to enhance care provision for TB patients with multimorbidity through a patient-centered approach.
Q3

Psychiatric Care Setting from the Perspective of Psychiatric Nursing Managers
Vieira L.C., Bocchi S.C., MacPhee M., Spiri W.C.
Background
Nursing managers are well-positioned to enhance holistic care for patients in psychiatric settings. Managers need to use evidence-based data available to them when making nurse staffing decisions. Patient classification systems can be an excellent source of patients’ priority care needs.
Objective
To understand the meaning of using patient classification systems as a management tool for psychiatric nursing managers.
Methods
Qualitative study with a content analysis methodological framework. Ten nursing managers from psychiatric institutions in the state of São Paulo participated. Data were collected between August 2016 and May 2017 using a semi-structured interview with recorded audio.
Results
The sample consisted of nine women and one man with an average of 14 years’ experience in mental health and seven years of management experience. The psychiatric care setting emerged as a general theme surrounded by four subthemes: current model of decision making, ideal model of decision making, nursing staff dimensioning/staffing, and professional and mental health legislation. Only half of the managers used a patient classification system as a management tool, and there were difficulties associated with their use of the tool.
Conclusion
A conceptual model was developed based on the themes, subthemes, categories, and sub-categories in this study. The model demonstrates major differences between psychiatric settings with biomedical models versus psychosocial models. Managers with knowledge of PCS data can better advocate for patients’ holistic needs and adequate nursing resource allocation. Managers may lack the knowledge and skills required for model transformation, and continuing management/leadership education is recommended.
Q3

The Development of a Cultural-based Questionnaire for Drug Use Prevention Programs for Adolescents: A Delphi Study
Tahlil T., Hadi N., Maulina, Marlina
Objective
This study aimed to identify a valid and cultural-based questionnaire for drug use prevention programs for adolescents.
Methods
The study used a three-round Delphi technique. A total of 21 participants with knowledge and experiences in community nursing (11 nurses) and education for junior high school students (11 teachers) in Aceh Province, Indonesia, were included. For the first round, focus group discussions were conducted. For the second round, participants were asked to indicate their levels of agreement and provide their comments on the proposed questionnaire. For the third round, participants were instructed to indicate their level of agreement with the final version of the developed questionnaire. The consensus was defined based on the percent agreement.
Results
Initially, 64 questions for four domains (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 29 items, intention = 9 items, behaviors = 12 items) were developed based on the FGDs and literature review. Finally, the four domains and 43 questions (knowledge = 14 items, attitude = 12 items, intention = 9 items, behaviours = 8 items) were supported by the group panels as the final instrument for the evaluation of drug use prevention programs for adolescents in schools.
Conclusion
Expert panels validated the content of the questionnaire for the drug use prevention programs in Indonesia. Nonetheless, further analysis and implementation of the instrument are required to identify the accuracy of the instrument.
Q3

Understanding the Relationship Between Care Quality Perception and Patient Safety Culture
Janghorban A., Moghri J., Ghavami V., Raesi R., Tabatabaee S.S.
Background
Assessing the perceived quality of care and safety culture by nurses is an important part of nursing practice and is vital for improving the quality of nursing care.
Aim
This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted using stratified and convenience sampling techniques from March 2023 to January 2024 among 412 nurses working in hospitals at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The data collection tools were standard care behavior questionnaires (CBI-42) and the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests at a significance level of 0.05.
Results
The perceived quality of care among nurses was high, with a score of 4.79 (1-6). The highest score was in “knowledge and professional skill” (5.03), while “communication and positive attitude” scored the lowest (4.59). Patient safety culture averaged 3.35 (1-5), with “overall perception of patient safety” at 4.82 and “non-punitive response to error” at 2.40. A significant direct relationship was found between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture (r=0.226, p<0.001), indicating that improvements in one may enhance the other.
Conclusion
Due to the existence of a direct relationship between perceived quality of care and patient safety culture, appropriate training and using the experiences of others, improving the relationship between nurses and patients, creating a sense of security in nurses, and solving the problems of nurses can enhance the quality of health care services.
Q3

Adherence to Radiation Protection Principles in the Clinical Environment among Anesthesia and Operating Room Nursing Students: Implications for Educational Interventions
Ghasemi S., Khosravi H., Imani B., Shabani N.
Background
The increasing use of ionizing radiation in clinical environments, particularly during surgeries such as orthopedics and neurosurgery, has heightened concerns about the potential health risks associated with this type of radiation. This issue is particularly relevant for nursing students undergoing training in operating room settings, where they are frequently exposed to various sources of radiation. To effectively implement radiation protection principles, it is crucial to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of the students toward ionizing radiation. Understanding their level of awareness and beliefs about radiation safety will inform the development of targeted training programs aimed at minimizing exposure and enhancing safety in clinical environments.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of 8th-semester undergraduate anesthesia and operating room nursing students toward radiation protection principles.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2024. In this study, students were selected via the census sampling method. The data related to the study were collected from valid questionnaires concerning the participants’ level of knowledge, attitudes, and performance toward ionizing radiation. The data analysis was also conducted at the descriptive and inferential statistics level via SPSS version 16 software.
Results
The knowledge, attitudes, and performance of the students in both fields were inadequate compared to the ideal standards. Additionally, the mean attitude score toward protective principles was significantly greater among operating room nursing students than anesthesia nursing students (p-value = 0.023). Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation was found between students' Grade Point Average (GPA) and their scores on knowledge and attitudes toward protective principles (r = 0.449, p-value = 0.000 and r = 0.648, p-value = 0.000, respectively).
Conclusion
This study revealed that the level of knowledge among students regarding ionizing radiation is lower than the desired standards for ensuring safety in clinical environments. As a result, it is essential to implement targeted training courses to enhance students' understanding of the risks associated with ionizing radiation.
Q3

The Effect of Emotional Intelligence, Caring Efficacy, and Social Support on Clinical Competency of Nursing Students
Park J., Rajaguru V., Kim J.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of emotional intelligence, caring efficacy, and social support on the clinical competency of Korean nursing students.
Methods
We conducted a descriptive correlational study from 5th March to 10th June 10, 2020, among 257 nursing students in 3rd and 4th years who participated in clinical practice at four universities in two cities. We collected the data using a self-structured questionnaire that included 129 items from the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), the General Self-efficacy (GSE) scale, and scales on social support and clinical competency. We analyzed the data using frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Results
The majority of the students, i.e., 80.2%, were female, 57.6% were in their 3rd year, and the students’ average age ranged from 22.91 to 4.75. The participants’ clinical competency was linked to their emotional intelligence (r =.457; p<.001), their ability to care for others (r =.516; p<.001), and their social support (r =.515; p^.001). There was a statistically significant difference in clinical competency based on the participants’ religion, academic performance, and satisfaction with their major and clinical practice. Factors, such as care efficacy, social support, emotional intelligence, religion, and significant satisfaction, influenced clinical competency.
Conclusion
Overall, 39.3% of the participants demonstrated clinical competency. The results have highlighted the need for the development of an effective educational program that can enhance emotional intelligence, care efficacy, social support, and major satisfaction, thereby promoting the clinical competency of nursing students.
Q3

Communication Methods Used with Conscious Intubated Patients: Scoping Review
Karmakar M., Panduragan S.L., Said F.M.
Background
Intubated conscious patients often experience communication difficulties. The present narrative review outlines the current evidence on communication methods adopted and the experience of conscious intubated patients in critical care areas.
Objectives
To our knowledge, studies have attempted to examine communication with conscious intubated patients. The present review had two objectives: (1) to identify the methods adopted by nurses and conscious intubated patients to ease the communication difficulties faced due to intubation and (2) to identify the experience of nurses and conscious intubated patients with the adopted communication methods.
Methods
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed throughout this review. PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched with the terms “intubated conscious patients,” “communication,” and “nurse”, including original research articles published between January 2019 and May 2024 on conscious patients needing intubation. Dissertations, review papers, non-interventional research, and articles written in languages other than English were excluded. Only eight of the original 2,041 studies, which included 137 intubated patients and for 545 nurses, met the inclusion criteria. The authors used the Mixed Method Appraisal tool (MMAT) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) to collect data and assess quality.
Results
After the first search of generated 2041 papers, only eight articles—representing various studies—were able to meet the inclusion requirements. The included studies were six (6) quantitative, one (1) qualitative study and one (1) mixed-method study. Four communication intervention types were identified, namely: (1) Communication boards/charts (two studies), which improved communication and increased patient satisfaction. (2) Gestures and facial expressions (four studies) were reported to be frequently initiated for communication by the nurses with the patients. (3) Multiple methods (three studies) used were found to be insufficient to communicate with the patients. (4) Digital technology program, including Communicative Digital Technology Program was found to be effective means of communication in three such studies.
Conclusion
Results imply that communication techniques may be useful in enhancing patient–nursing professional communication with conscious intubated patients. However, in developing countries with fewer resources, a low-cost communication tool addressing both physical and emotional needs may be developed to aid in communication among patients and nurses.
Q3

A Case Report on Placenta Accreta: Developing a Conceptual Framework
Alzboon G., Kawafha M., Al Maghaireh D., Alhamory S.
Introduction
Placenta accreta is a pathological condition of the placenta associated with multiple maternal and neonatal complications, but its diagnosis and treatment have been sparsely reported from the nursing viewpoint. This report describes a case of placenta accreta from the nursing perspective to develop a conceptual framework of care.
Case Presentation
Our case involved a 37-year-old pregnant woman with four previous caesarean sections and a previous in vitro fertilisation. She was diagnosed with placenta accreta only in the operating theatre during a scheduled caesarean section, and she had not performed thorough antenatal care as in her previous pregnancies despite having significant symptoms, such as severe urinary incontinence. The patient experienced many complications during the caesarean section, including bladder injury, massive haemorrhage, and hysterectomy.
Conclusion
We develop a theoretical framework illustrating the core factors that influence the management of placenta accreta and associated maternal morbidities. This model highlights the distinction between patient characteristics, nurse characteristics, organisational factors, and pregnancy outcomes and shows their relationship to the diagnosis and prevention of placenta accreta. The model has important implications for research and practice, and the case reminds nurses of their recommended interventions to diagnose, manage, and prevent placenta accreta. The quality of care for placenta accreta cases should be promoted through the assessment of patients, nurses, and organisational factors and the application of prevention measures.
Q3

Development of Community Participation Program on Knowledge and Health Prevention Behaviors Related to Hypertension among Hill Tribe Older Adults in Northern Thailand
Panya P., Yaemmisri W., Viriyaratanakul B., Praison P., Gantagad T., Sareeso P., Guntapan N., Nuansaard I.
Background
The Akha hill tribe of older adults in Thailand, a culturally diverse minority, faces health disparities. Due to limited access to health information and services, those who are unable to read Thai are at a higher risk of developing hypertension. Consequently, hill tribe communities need community engagement to enhance healthcare access and communication between health workers and the community.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a community participation program on hypertension knowledge and health prevention behaviors among Akha older adults in Thailand.
Methods
This program was developed based on evidence and insights from community scholars and stakeholders. The program included three activities: 1] training the volunteers, 2] home visits by trained adolescent and adult volunteers, and 3] providing hypertension knowledge through village broadcasts. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted using an Akha-specific hypertension knowledge and prevention behaviors questionnaire.
Results
Among the thirty healthy Akha older adults who could not communicate in Thai, following the implementation of the community participation program, there was a significant increase in hypertension knowledge (P = 0.000) and HT prevention behaviors (P = 0.017).
Conclusion
The community participation program could improve hypertension knowledge and hypertension prevention behaviors of older adults in the Akha hill tribe by bridging the gap between the healthcare system and the community.
Q3

Role of the Nursing Professional in Euthanasia: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Avila M.I., Díaz Chavarro B.C., Campo A.P., Vargas Murillo S.M.
Background
Until the date of the search, Euthanasia was legally accepted in 5 countries: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Canada and Colombia.
Objective
We aimed to identify the role of nurses in euthanasia based on articles published both nationally and internationally between 2014 and 2022.
Methods
Qualitative and quantitative studies, editorials, literature reviews and Colombian regulations were included. Publications that did not meet the criteria of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement and the Spanish Critical Appraisal Skills Programme were excluded. In total, 57 articles were evaluated and 19 were selected. Appropriate copyright principles were followed in accordance with Colombian Law 23 of 1982.
Results
With the data obtained, 4 thematic categories were developed as follows: reception and management of euthanasia requests and regulations in Colombia; emotional accompaniment and effective communication with the patient and family; participation in euthanasia preparations and administration of medications; and management of requests and administration of medications.
Conclusion
Nursing plays an important role in the care of the patient requesting euthanasia, from the reception and management of the request to the administration of the lethal drugs.
Q3

Perceived Health Risks Associated with Smartphone Use Among Health College Students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia
Qalawa S.A., Ibrahim N.M., Fadlalmola H.A., Elmansy F.M., Elbqry M.G.
Background
Smartphones have evolved into a fusion of traditional personal digital assistants and cellular phones, integrating mobile communication capabilities with features parallel to those of a handheld computer.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the health risks associated with smartphone use and the prevalence and nature of observed health issues among health college students at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
Employing a descriptive cross-sectional research design, this study surveyed a convenience sample of 511 health college students at Qassim University. The data collection instrument comprised two sections: Section 1 assessed sociodemographic, academic, and health-related information, while Section 2 evaluated the health risks as perceived by students.
Results
The majority of the participants were women (71%) and were studying nursing (26%). A significant proportion (39.9%) reported blurred vision, while 38.6% indicated a lack of adequate sleep. Notably, no significant association was observed between the health complaints and sociodemographic information. The analysis also revealed no significant relationship between health complaints and smartphone usage patterns.
Conclusion
The findings highlight a critical need for further research to investigate the factors contributing to the effect of smartphone use on the physiological well-being of university students. Such research is essential for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the associated health risks.
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Collectanea Mathematica
77 citations, 3.11%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
76 citations, 3.07%
|
|
Journal of Algebra
67 citations, 2.71%
|
|
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
65 citations, 2.63%
|
|
Communications in Algebra
54 citations, 2.18%
|
|
Mathematische Nachrichten
41 citations, 1.66%
|
|
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics
40 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Mathematics
40 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Journal of Geometric Analysis
37 citations, 1.49%
|
|
International Mathematics Research Notices
34 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics
31 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Journal of Inequalities and Applications
31 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Mathematische Zeitschrift
30 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Results in Mathematics
26 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics
24 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales - Serie A: Matematicas
24 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Archiv der Mathematik
22 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Algebra and its Applications
21 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Advances in Mathematics
21 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications
19 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Beitrage zur Algebra und Geometrie
19 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
19 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Symbolic Computation
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Functional Analysis
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Mathematische Annalen
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Potential Analysis
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Revista Matematica Complutense
18 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Acta Mathematica Scientia
17 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Algebra and Number Theory
17 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society
16 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Function Spaces
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
International Journal of Algebra and Computation
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Complex Analysis and Operator Theory
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo
14 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Integral Equations and Operator Theory
14 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Linear Algebra and Its Applications
14 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Positivity
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Manuscripta Mathematica
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Monatshefte fur Mathematik
13 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Combinatorial Theory - Series A
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Forum Mathematicum
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Analysis and Mathematical Physics
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Selecta Mathematica, New Series
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal d'Analyse Mathematique
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Advances in Difference Equations
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Linear and Multilinear Algebra
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Differential Equations
12 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Stochastic Analysis and Applications
11 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Israel Journal of Mathematics
11 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques
11 citations, 0.44%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematics
11 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Acta Mathematica Vietnamica
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Ricerche di Matematica
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Advances in Operator Theory
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Kyoto Journal of Mathematics
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Mathematics
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Fractal and Fractional
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Axioms
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal des Mathematiques Pures et Appliquees
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Illinois Journal of Mathematics
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Boundary Value Problems
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Commutative Algebra
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Georgian Mathematical Journal
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of the London Mathematical Society
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Symmetry
9 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Advances in Geometry
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Abstract and Applied Analysis
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Pacific Journal of Mathematics
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Springer INdAM Series
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Nagoya Mathematical Journal
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Science China Mathematics
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Annals of Functional Analysis
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Applicable Analysis
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Integral Transforms and Special Functions
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Computational Methods and Function Theory
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Stochastics
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Evolution Equations and Control Theory
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Open Mathematics
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Mathematics
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Journal of Mathematics
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Discrete and Computational Geometry
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Applied Mathematics
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Springer Nature
999 citations, 40.35%
|
|
Elsevier
431 citations, 17.41%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
163 citations, 6.58%
|
|
Wiley
87 citations, 3.51%
|
|
MDPI
74 citations, 2.99%
|
|
World Scientific
72 citations, 2.91%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
68 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
63 citations, 2.54%
|
|
American Mathematical Society
52 citations, 2.1%
|
|
Oxford University Press
44 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
37 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
33 citations, 1.33%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
29 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Tusi Mathematical Research Group (TMRG)
23 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
20 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Canadian Mathematical Society
19 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Rocky Mountain Mathematics Consortium
17 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Duke University Press
15 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
11 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Science in China Press
10 citations, 0.4%
|
|
University of California Press
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Kyoto University
8 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Hacettepe University
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Steklov Mathematical Institute
7 citations, 0.28%
|
|
IOP Publishing
6 citations, 0.24%
|
|
AIP Publishing
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Mathematical Society of Japan (Project Euclid)
4 citations, 0.16%
|
|
University of Nis
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
University of Warwick
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Wilmington Scientific Publishers
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Taehan Suhakhoe
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long Term Care
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
3 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Mathematical Society of Japan
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Tohoku University Medical Press
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Geometry & Topology Publications
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Global Science Press
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
ASME International
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Cellule MathDoc/Centre Mersenne
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Faculty of Mathematics, Kyushu University
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Michigan Mathematical Journal
2 citations, 0.08%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Institut Camille Jordan
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Universitaria Publishing House, University of Craiova
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Academy
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Mathematical Society of the Republic of China
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Mathematical Society
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Press of Boston
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Tech Science Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
The Society of Practical Otolaryngology
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Division of Functional Equations, The Mathematical Society of Japan (JST)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Tokyo Journal of Mathematics
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (38 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
University of Genoa
11 publications, 2.12%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
10 publications, 1.92%
|
|
University of Milan
9 publications, 1.73%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
9 publications, 1.73%
|
|
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
8 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Pavia
8 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
8 publications, 1.54%
|
|
University of Barcelona
8 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
7 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Valencia
7 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Catalonia
7 publications, 1.35%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
7 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Catania
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Trento
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Osaka University
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Seville
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Warsaw
6 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Tehran
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Helsinki
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Hiroshima University
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
5 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Ghent University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Linköping University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Turin
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Aalborg University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Salento
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Roma Tre University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Charles University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Vienna
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Salamanca
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Granada
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Texas A&M University
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Utah
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Mohamed Boudiaf University of M'Sila
4 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Ilam University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Bern
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Tianjin University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Florence
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Messina
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Siena
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Nagoya University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Public University of Navarre
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Baylor University
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Cádiz
3 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Al Jouf University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Shaqra University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Kharazmi University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Payame Noor University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Kurdistan
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Farhangian University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hanoi University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Mazandaran
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Qatar University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Karlstad University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Aalto University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Geneva
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Xiamen University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tianjin Normal University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bergen
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Padua
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Shantou University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Perugia
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tongling University
2 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Osaka University
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Ilam University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Bern
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Milan
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Pavia
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Nagoya University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Al Jouf University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Shaqra University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Stockholm University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Trento
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Ferrara
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Seville
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Warsaw
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Baylor University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Granada
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Kharazmi University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Sabanci University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Jadavpur University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Payame Noor University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Gebze Technical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Urmia University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Semnan University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Yeditepe University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Kurdistan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Bayburt University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Hanoi University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Hanoi National University of Education
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Hue University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Da Nang
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Quy Nhon University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Chennai Mathematical Institute
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Birjand
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Sichuan University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Erzurum Technical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Namik Kemal University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
ORT Braude Academic College of Engineering
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Linköping University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Nankai University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Chongqing University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Dalian Maritime University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Turku
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Tianjin University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
USA
|
USA, 87, 16.73%
USA
87 publications, 16.73%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 80, 15.38%
Italy
80 publications, 15.38%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 76, 14.62%
Spain
76 publications, 14.62%
|
China
|
China, 51, 9.81%
China
51 publications, 9.81%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 39, 7.5%
Germany
39 publications, 7.5%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 29, 5.58%
Brazil
29 publications, 5.58%
|
France
|
France, 27, 5.19%
France
27 publications, 5.19%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 27, 5.19%
Iran
27 publications, 5.19%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 26, 5%
Poland
26 publications, 5%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 23, 4.42%
Japan
23 publications, 4.42%
|
India
|
India, 18, 3.46%
India
18 publications, 3.46%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 16, 3.08%
Romania
16 publications, 3.08%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 13, 2.5%
Argentina
13 publications, 2.5%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 11, 2.12%
Canada
11 publications, 2.12%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 2.12%
Turkey
11 publications, 2.12%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 10, 1.92%
Norway
10 publications, 1.92%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 1.92%
Finland
10 publications, 1.92%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 1.73%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 1.73%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 9, 1.73%
Czech Republic
9 publications, 1.73%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 9, 1.73%
Sweden
9 publications, 1.73%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 1.54%
Russia
8 publications, 1.54%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 1.54%
Mexico
8 publications, 1.54%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 1.35%
Austria
7 publications, 1.35%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 7, 1.35%
Belgium
7 publications, 1.35%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 7, 1.35%
United Kingdom
7 publications, 1.35%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 1.35%
Vietnam
7 publications, 1.35%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 1.35%
Denmark
7 publications, 1.35%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 1.15%
Portugal
6 publications, 1.15%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 6, 1.15%
Tunisia
6 publications, 1.15%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 1.15%
Croatia
6 publications, 1.15%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 1.15%
Switzerland
6 publications, 1.15%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 5, 0.96%
Algeria
5 publications, 0.96%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 0.77%
Israel
4 publications, 0.77%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.77%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.77%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 3, 0.58%
Azerbaijan
3 publications, 0.58%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.38%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.38%
Greece
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.38%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.38%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.38%
Chile
2 publications, 0.38%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.19%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.19%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.19%
Australia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.19%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.19%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.19%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.19%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.19%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.19%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.19%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.19%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
USA
|
USA, 29, 15.26%
USA
29 publications, 15.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 21, 11.05%
Italy
21 publications, 11.05%
|
China
|
China, 20, 10.53%
China
20 publications, 10.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 19, 10%
Germany
19 publications, 10%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 19, 10%
Spain
19 publications, 10%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 16, 8.42%
Brazil
16 publications, 8.42%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 13, 6.84%
Iran
13 publications, 6.84%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 11, 5.79%
Japan
11 publications, 5.79%
|
India
|
India, 9, 4.74%
India
9 publications, 4.74%
|
France
|
France, 6, 3.16%
France
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 6, 3.16%
Argentina
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 6, 3.16%
Belgium
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 3.16%
Poland
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 3.16%
Turkey
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 5, 2.63%
Romania
5 publications, 2.63%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4, 2.11%
United Kingdom
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 2.11%
Vietnam
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 2.11%
Norway
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.58%
Canada
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 1.58%
Morocco
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 1.58%
Switzerland
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 1.58%
Sweden
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.05%
Austria
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 1.05%
Denmark
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 1.05%
Israel
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 1.05%
Mexico
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 1.05%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 1.05%
Tunisia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 1.05%
Finland
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 1.05%
Croatia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 1.05%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.53%
Russia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.53%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.53%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.53%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.53%
Australia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.53%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.53%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.53%
Greece
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.53%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.53%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.53%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Show all (12 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
4 profile journal articles
Blasco Oscar

University of Valencia
110 publications,
674 citations
h-index: 14