Canadian Modern Language Review
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.5
SJR
0.294
CiteScore
1.5
Categories
Linguistics and Language
Education
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1996-2024
journal names
Canadian Modern Language Review
Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes
CAN MOD LANG REV
Top-3 citing journals

Canadian Modern Language Review
(925 citations)

System
(602 citations)

Foreign Language Annals
(500 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Ottawa
(159 publications)

University of Toronto
(93 publications)

Dalhousie University
(76 publications)

University of Ottawa
(14 publications)

Université du Québec à Montréal
(14 publications)

York University
(7 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 944
Q1

Crisis-prompted online language teaching: a qualitative inquiry into autonomy among teachers in refugee settings
Charitonos K., Khalil B., Ross T.W., Bonfini-Hotlosz C., Aristorenas M., Webster B.
Abstract
Language is central to issues of displacement and education. This paper examines how English language teachers in refugee settings negotiated and exercised autonomy in teaching and learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It draws on the notion of autonomy and its dynamics in language classrooms in refugee settings. The paper focuses on one displacement context – Jordan’s refugee settings – to offer a fine-grained analysis of teachers’ accounts to synthesise how teachers negotiated the transition to online teaching and developed practices and relations across different sites. The study recognises teachers’ rights in contributing their own experience and expertise and draws on the Participatory Ethnographic Evaluation Research (PEER) methodology, which involved working closely with a group of six language teachers as peer researchers, who conducted in-depth interviews with two of their peers. The analysis examines the ways in which autonomy was exercised, mobilised, resourced, constrained and shaped by contextual factors during the pandemic and thus provides a nuanced understanding of teachers’ experiences. The study points to the importance of understanding teacher autonomy in the context of language teaching in technology-poor environments. By providing critical insights into the dynamics of teacher autonomy in unique professional settings, it contributes to the broader discourse on digital language learning and agency, roles and skills needed by teachers to support crisis preparedness for the future.
Q1

Interacting with ChatGPT in essay writing: A study of L2 learners’ task motivation
Zare J., Al-Issa A., Ranjbaran Madiseh F.
Abstract
This study explored the effects of interacting with ChatGPT 4.0 on L2 learners’ motivation to write English argumentative essays. Conducted at a public university in a non-English-speaking country, the study had an experimental and mixed-methods design. It utilized both quantitative and qualitative data analyses to inform the development of effective AI-enhanced tailored interventions for teaching L2 essay writing. Overall, the results revealed that interacting with ChatGPT 4.0 had a positive lasting effect on learners’ motivation to write argumentative essays in English. However, a decline in their motivation at the delayed post-intervention stage suggested the need to maintain a balance between utilizing ChatGPT as a writing support tool and enhancing their independent writing capabilities. Learners attributed the increase in their motivation to several factors, including their perceived improvement in essay writing skills, the supportive learning environment created by ChatGPT as a tutor, positive interactions with it, and the development of meta-cognitive awareness by addressing their specific writing issues. The study highlights the potential of AI-based tools in enhancing L2 learners’ motivation in English classrooms.
Q1

Migrants’ and refugees’ digital literacies in life and language learning
Bradley L., Guichon N., Kukulska-Hulme A.
Q1
ReCALL
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Integrating collaborative digital multimodal tasks in Spanish as a second language course
Elola I., Bueno-Alastuey M.C., López-Pérez M.V.
Abstract
The emphasis in L2 learning has mainly focused on individual writers and monomodal academic genres (e.g. narration, argumentation), neglecting the potential of collaborative composing and the use of digital genres that introduce additional semiotic sources, for fear of having to deal with “a messy transition to digital multimodal communication” (Lotherington, 2021: 220). Yet, because Web 2.0 technological upgrades have enabled interactivity, literacy has morphed from discretely reading and writing a static page to dynamically reading and writing a multimodal one, which underpins collaborative authorship and (local and global) audience awareness. Considering the inclusion of working collaboratively with multimodal tasks in the L2 classroom, the question of how to help students effectively incorporate multimodal with academic monomodal texts remains unanswered. In response to this challenge, this study examines the design and implementation of an online task to foster multiliteracies. Thirty-seven international students of diverse disciplines (e.g. economics, engineering, history), enrolled in a Spanish as a second language course, worked collaboratively to create multimodal texts based on previously created monomodal texts. Informed by a student questionnaire and a teacher focus group, we analyzed both students’ and teachers’ perceptions to ascertain the effectiveness of the intervention and the possibilities these kinds of tasks bring to the foreign language classroom. Both sets of participants reported positive results concerning linguistic advancement, motivation, and multiliteracies development. Pedagogical recommendations related to the inclusion of this pedagogical practice are provided.
Q1

Blend up: empowering LESLLA learners through blended learning
Jehoul A., Van Nuffel H., Schiepers M.
Abstract
Blended language learning has recently experienced substantial growth, offering numerous potential benefits such as increased learning opportunities and personalization. However, digital inequalities persist, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like migrants with limited education. While the integration of technology in adult education may pose additional challenges for these groups, online learning paradoxically holds the promise of enhancing their basic skills. This study addresses this apparent contradiction, focusing on blended learning in Dutch second language (L2) education in Flanders (Belgium) for L2 learners with emerging literacy and limited formal education, representing the most vulnerable subgroup of L2 learners. This group is referred to as LESLLA learners (LESLLA is an acronym for Literacy Education and Second Language Learning for Adults). Through a combination of a systematic literature review and a needs analysis of stakeholders, including LESLLA learners themselves, the study explores the benefits and challenges of blended learning for LESLLA learners. The study reveals that while many affordances and limitations for adult L2 learners in general also apply to LESLLA learners, the significance varies based on their characteristics, curriculum goals, and context. In order to realize the affordances, while also tackling the challenges, effective blended education for low-literate L2 learners requires (1) a thoughtful design of the blend, in which instructional design principles are integrated with didactic principles for L2 teaching; (2) effective teacher conduct; and (3) powerful policy of adult education centers. This paper outlines the characteristics of each component, offering insights to strengthen blended L2 learning experiences for LESLLA learners.
Q1

Digital technology and language learning: insights from teachers of adult migrant learners
Maahs I., DeCapua A., Triulzi M.
Abstract
Increasing global digitalization is changing the everyday language skills required to participate in society, to carry out professional activities, and to take advantage of educational opportunities. As a result, new linguistic and digital competences are required for migrants. At the same time, digitalization offers new potential for learner-oriented language learning. In this article, we compare the results of two studies on teachers of adult multilingual migrant learners. These teachers instruct learners at different levels of literacy and with varied prior formal learning experiences. Both studies are situated in the German education system. The results illustrate how teachers and learners can work together using digital technologies to promote language learning. We explore the opportunities for effective, multilingual, and motivating language learning, as well as the challenges faced by learners and teachers, pointing to the need for further training in digital technology for both groups.
Q1

Modeling the relationship between online L2 motivational self-system and EFL learners’ virtual exchange self-regulations: the mediator and moderator roles of L2 grit
Rahimi A.R., Sevilla-Pavón A.
Abstract
While previous studies in computer-assisted language learning have extensively explored sociolinguistic factors, such as cultural competence, important psycholinguistic factors such as online L2 motivational self-system, L2 grit, and online self-regulation in relation to virtual exchange (VE) have remained widely unexplored. To address this gap, a study was conducted with 92 Spanish English as a foreign language learners who exchanged language and culture with Cypriot and Irish students and responded to questionnaires adapted for the study context, as part of the SOCIEMOVE (Socioemotional Skills Through Virtual Exchange) Project. The partial least squares structural equation modeling approach showed that language learners who set positive personal goals for the future and evaluate their current learning progress in VE can regulate their learning in it. Interestingly, the sign of authenticity gap was found in the study context, since learners’ motivation to learn in VE was higher compared to their previous language learning contexts, resulting in more effort and consistency of interest in setting their goals, evaluating their progress, and asking for help from others. Furthermore, learners’ L2 grit moderated and mediated the correlation between learners’ online motivation and online self-regulation, indicating that VE success requires long-term perseverance of effort and consistency of interest. Accordingly, a new conceptual framework for VE was developed. In addition, one of the main implications is that teachers who employ VE should focus more on learners’ current needs and the goals they wish to achieve when exchanging information rather than only focusing on their accomplishments based on the course syllabus.
Q1

Migrants’ digital skills development: Engaging with and creating digital cultural activities on the ENACT web app
Satar M., Seedhouse P., Kharrufa A., Ganassin S., Dooly M., Buitrago Peña J., Öztekin E., Akcan S., Haznedar B.
Abstract
Migrants encounter multiple challenges, such as learning new languages and adapting to a new life. While digital technologies help them learn, limited research has been conducted on their digital skills development. In this article, we report on migrants’ digital skills development while learning language through culture using a web app developed by an EU-funded project that aimed to promote social cohesion through a two-way exchange of knowledge and skills. Forty-six migrant and 43 home community members in Finland, Spain, Türkiye, and the UK participated in intercultural and intergenerational pairs to engage with and co-create interactive digital cultural activities in multiple languages. Participants’ digital, linguistic and cultural gains were measured before and after the workshops. We report on participants’ digital skills, measured by a digital competence self-assessment tool developed based on DigComp, and interviews with the participants. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed deductively using the categories of the DigComp framework. Findings indicate statistically significant improvement in migrants’ self-reported digital skills. Highest gains were in the competency area of digital content creation. Comparison of migrants’ digital skill development with that of home community members did not show any statistically significant differences, supporting our argument against the deficiency perspective towards migrant populations. Interview data suggested overall positive evaluations and highlighted the role of the web app instructions for content creation. We conclude with suggestions for further research and argue for inclusive pedagogies, emphasising how both community members learned from and with each other during the workshops.
Q1

Teachers’ articulations of digital resources in an upper secondary programme for newly arrived migrants
Febring L., Risenfors S.
Abstract
The highly digitalised nature of contemporary society has made digital literacy important for newly arrived migrants. However, for teachers, the use of information and communication technologies can be challenging. The aim of the present study is to gain a deeper understanding of how teachers perceive digital resources as useful for teaching migrants language and subject skills. The research question is, In what way do teachers at the language introduction programme for newly arrived migrants in Sweden articulate the use of digital resources in relation to language teaching and in relation to subject teaching? This qualitative study is based on observations of 28 lessons in different subjects in the language introduction programme, as well as interviews with the observed teachers. In analysing the material, we first used the TPACK in situ model (Pareto & Willermark, 2019) to organise the data on the use of digital resources, and thereafter discourse theory (Howarth, 2005) was used to analyse the data. The results show that the teachers limited their students’ use of digital resources during the lessons, which is apparent in two discourses: distrust and dichotomy. In the discourse on distrust, digital technology is seen as an obstacle to teaching, and the discourse dichotomy is about the opposition between the digital and the physical. Moreover, articulations were often expressed in terms of identity; the teachers talked about themselves in relation to digital resources, rather than talking about how they use digital resources in their teaching.
Q1

Digital technologies and identity negotiation: a study of trilingual Uyghur university students’ language learning experiences in intranational migrations
Ye X.
Abstract
This three-year longitudinal case study explored how trilingual Uyghur intranational migrant students utilized digital technologies to learn languages and negotiate their identities in Han-dominant environments during their internal migrations within China, a topic that has been scarcely researched before. Adopting a poststructuralist perspective of identity, the study traced four Uyghur students who migrated from underdeveloped southern Xinjiang to northern Xinjiang for junior high school education, and to more developed cities in eastern and southern China for senior high school education and higher education. A qualitative approach was adopted, utilizing semi-structured interviews, class and campus observations, daily conversations, WeChat conversations, participants’ reflections, and assignments. Findings reveal that Uyghur minority students utilized digital technologies to bridge the English proficiency gap with Han students, negotiate their marginalized identities, integrate into the mainstream education system, and extend the empowerment to other ethnic minority students. This was in sharp contrast to the significant challenges and identity crises they faced when they did not have access to digital technologies to learn Mandarin in boarding secondary schools. An unprecedented finding is that, with digital empowerment, Uyghur minority students could achieve accomplishments that were even difficult for Han students to attain and gain upward social mobility by finding employment in Han-dominant first-tier cities. The implications of utilizing digital technologies to support intranational migrant ethnic minority students’ language learning and identity development are discussed.
Q1

Exploring attitudes to generative AI in education for English as an additional language (EAL) adult learners
Creely E., Barnes M., Tour E., Henderson M., Waterhouse P., Pena M.A., Patel S.V.
Abstract
This article addresses a critical gap in international research concerning digital literacies and empowerment among adults who are English as an additional language (EAL) learners. In the Australian context, where digital communication and services are embedded in all aspects of life and work, proficiency in digital literacies, including advanced technologies like generative artificial intelligence (AI), is vital for working and living in Australia. Despite the increasing prevalence and significance of generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT, there is a notable absence of dedicated programs to assist EAL learners in understanding and utilising generative AI, potentially impacting their employability and everyday life. This article presents findings from a larger study conducted within training providers, spanning adult educational institutions nationwide. Through analysis of data gathered from surveys and focus groups, the article investigates the knowledge and attitudes of students, educators, and leaders regarding integrating generative AI into the learning program for adult EAL learners. The results reveal a hesitance among educators, particularly concerning beginning language learners, in incorporating generative AI into educational programs. Conversely, many adult learners demonstrate enthusiasm for learning about its potential benefits despite having limited understanding. These disparities underscore the pressing need for comprehensive professional development for educators and program leaders. The findings also highlight the need to develop the AI literacy of learners to foster their understanding and digital empowerment. The article concludes by advocating for a systemic approach to include generative AI as an important part of learning programs with students often from adult migrant and refugee backgrounds.
Q1

Digital empowerment for rural migrant students in China: Identity, investment, and digital literacies beyond the classroom
Liu G.L.
Abstract
Drawing upon Darvin and Norton’s (2015) model of investment, this article examines how Xing and Jimmy (both pseudonyms) as two male Chinese English as a foreign language learners from rural migrant backgrounds negotiate their identities and assemble their social and cultural resources to invest in autonomous digital literacies for language learning and the assertion of a legitimate place in urban spaces. Employing a connective ethnographic design, this study collected data through interviews, reflexive journals, digital artifacts, and on-campus observations. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic approach as well as within- and cross-case data analysis methods. The findings indicate that Xing and Jimmy experienced a profound sense of alienation and exclusion as they migrated from under-resourced rural spaces to the urban elite field. The unequal power relations in urban classrooms subjected them to marginalized and inadequate rural identities by denying them the right to speak and be heard. However, engaging with digital literacies in the wild allowed these migrant learners to access a wide range of linguistic, cultural, and symbolic resources, empowering them to reframe their identities as legitimate English speakers. The acquisition of such legitimacy enabled them to challenge the prevailing rural–urban exclusionary ideologies to claim the right to speak. This article closes by offering implications for empowering rural migrant students as socially competent members of the Chinese higher education system in the digital age.
Q1

ChatGPT in foreign language lesson plan creation: Trends, variability, and historical biases
Dornburg A., Davin K.J.
Abstract
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) models holds potential for aiding teachers in the generation of pedagogical materials. However, numerous knowledge gaps concerning the behavior of these models obfuscate the generation of research-informed guidance for their effective usage. Here, we assess trends in prompt specificity, variability, and weaknesses in foreign language teacher lesson plans generated by zero-shot prompting in ChatGPT. Iterating a series of prompts that increased in complexity, we found that output lesson plans were generally high quality, though additional context and specificity to a prompt did not guarantee a concomitant increase in quality. Additionally, we observed extreme cases of variability in outputs generated by the same prompt. In many cases, this variability reflected a conflict between outdated (e.g. reciting scripted dialogues) and more current research-based pedagogical practices (e.g. a focus on communication). These results suggest that the training of generative AI models on classic texts concerning pedagogical practices may bias generated content toward teaching practices that have been long refuted by research. Collectively, our results offer immediate translational implications for practicing and training foreign language teachers on the use of AI tools. More broadly, these findings highlight trends in generative AI output that have implications for the development of pedagogical materials across a diversity of content areas.
Q1

The effect of textual and textual-pictorial glosses on incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted listening
Shahipanah A., Khajavy G.H., Elahi Shirvan M.
Abstract
This study investigated how multimedia glossing affects incidental vocabulary learning from a listening task on mobile devices. A total of 118 English language learners were asked to listen to a story with 25 glossed target words on their mobile phones. In order to examine the effects of different types of glossing, participants were divided into four groups with access to four glosses during their listening: L1 textual, L2 textual, L1 textual and pictorial, and L2 textual and pictorial. Two vocabulary tests (i.e. definition-supply test and meaning-recognition test) were administrated immediately after treatment and two weeks later to measure vocabulary gain for target words. The results indicated that participants who had access to L1 textual and pictorial glosses had significantly higher vocabulary gains than other conditions, especially in meaning-recall word knowledge. Finally, a detailed discussion of the findings was provided to explain the results based on the theoretical framework of the study.
Q1

Gauging the effectiveness of a mobile application for learning English phrasal verbs
Alhujaylan H.
Abstract
This study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the efficacy of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in teaching English phrasal verbs (PVs) in a 12-week study. The participants were 122 EFL college students divided equally into an experimental and a control group. The experimental group was assigned PV learning on an iOS-based application (henceforth referred to as “app”) for eight weeks; the control group learned the same PVs through paper-based material. Pre-tests, post-tests, and weekly class tests were conducted, and one-way ANOVAs were performed to evaluate the differences between the two groups using their pre-test and post-test scores, with repeated measures ANOVA used to analyse the learning gains in weekly tests. The results revealed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the post-test (F = 6.09, p = .015, Cohen’s d = 0.45) and weekly tests (F = 31.68, p = .000). A Likert-scale-based e-questionnaire consisting of 19 items was administered to the experimental group to obtain their perceptions of the app’s usefulness for learning English PVs. The overall results suggest that MALL, particularly with this specific mobile app, may enhance students’ ability to understand and use English PVs, a key aspect of vocabulary skills. The findings can be used to encourage instructors to employ MALL for teaching the English lexicon for better learning outcomes in EFL settings.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
Canadian Modern Language Review
925 citations, 5.64%
|
|
System
602 citations, 3.67%
|
|
Foreign Language Annals
500 citations, 3.05%
|
|
Language Teaching Research
486 citations, 2.96%
|
|
Modern Language Journal
461 citations, 2.81%
|
|
Language Learning
371 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Language Teaching
284 citations, 1.73%
|
|
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
279 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Language Learning Journal
202 citations, 1.23%
|
|
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
184 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
181 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
171 citations, 1.04%
|
|
TESOL Quarterly
165 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Language Awareness
157 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
138 citations, 0.84%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
138 citations, 0.84%
|
|
RELC Journal
135 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Computer Assisted Language Learning
130 citations, 0.79%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
127 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Second Language Writing
126 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
120 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
114 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
113 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Language Learning & Language Teaching
113 citations, 0.69%
|
|
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
107 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Applied Linguistics
96 citations, 0.58%
|
|
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics (Belgium)
95 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Language, Culture and Curriculum
94 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Language Testing
90 citations, 0.55%
|
|
International Journal of Multilingualism
85 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Language, Identity and Education
76 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Language Assessment Quarterly
76 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
71 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Second Language Learning and Teaching
70 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Applied Psycholinguistics
69 citations, 0.42%
|
|
SAGE Open
66 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Language and Education
65 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
65 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Bilingual Research Journal
64 citations, 0.39%
|
|
English for Specific Purposes
59 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Applied Linguistics Review
58 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
58 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Linguistics and Education
57 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Languages
57 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Bilingualism
55 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Benjamins Current Topics
52 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
51 citations, 0.31%
|
|
ReCALL
50 citations, 0.3%
|
|
TESOL Journal
50 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Reading and Writing
48 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
48 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Studies in Corpus Linguistics
48 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
45 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
45 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Revue des sciences de l éducation
45 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Pragmatics and Beyond New Series
44 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Language Teaching and Research
42 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Bilingualism
41 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cogent Education
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Second Language Research
40 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Educational Linguistics
39 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Assessing Writing
38 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
37 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Pragmatics
37 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Listening
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
33 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Éducation et francophonie
32 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
La Revue de l’AQEFLS Revue de l’Association québécoise des enseignants de français langue seconde
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Linguistics and Language Compass
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
29 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
28 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of French Language Studies
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Classroom Discourse
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Education Sciences
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Francophonies d Amérique
25 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Language Testing in Asia
24 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Alsic
23 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Review of Educational Research
22 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Review of Education
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ETS Research Report Series
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Chinese Literacy in China
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Sustainability
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Interchange
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Multilingual Research Journal
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Spanish Language Teaching
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Reading Research Quarterly
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Lingua
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SHS Web of Conferences
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Language Teaching for Young Learners
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AILA Applied Linguistics Series
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Language and Intercultural Communication
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
TASK Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning
18 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2365 citations, 14.41%
|
|
Wiley
2198 citations, 13.39%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1590 citations, 9.69%
|
|
Elsevier
1529 citations, 9.32%
|
|
SAGE
1227 citations, 7.48%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
988 citations, 6.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
947 citations, 5.77%
|
|
Springer Nature
836 citations, 5.09%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
403 citations, 2.46%
|
|
IGI Global
330 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Oxford University Press
294 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
231 citations, 1.41%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
227 citations, 1.38%
|
|
MDPI
164 citations, 1%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
140 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Academy Publication
129 citations, 0.79%
|
|
OpenEdition
111 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Peeters Publishers
101 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Emerald
57 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
43 citations, 0.26%
|
|
CAIRN
34 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
31 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
27 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
26 citations, 0.16%
|
|
EDP Sciences
21 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
20 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SciELO
19 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
16 citations, 0.1%
|
|
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi
15 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hacettepe University
12 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
10 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Annual Reviews
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Association of Multimedia-Assisted Learning
8 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Selcuk University
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Revues.org
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
6 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AOSIS
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University College Cork
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research in Corpus Linguistics
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association des Professeurs de Langues des Instituts Universitaires de Technologie (APLIUT)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Asociacion Espanola De Logopedia Foniatria Y Audiologia
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Verlag Hans Huber AG
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Groupe detude et de recherche en anglais de specialite
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad De Antioquia
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Nakom
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CMV Verlag
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Transstellar Journal Publications and Research Consultancy Private Limited
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Architectural Institute of Japan
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
School of Education, University of Louisiana at Monroe
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Grupo Comunicar, Colectivo Andaluz de Educacion en Medios de Comunicacion
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Australian Reading Association
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
S. Karger AG
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
University of Ottawa
159 publications, 2.46%
|
|
University of Toronto
93 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Dalhousie University
76 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Guelph
60 publications, 0.93%
|
|
York University
59 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
55 publications, 0.85%
|
|
McGill University
51 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Alberta
49 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Calgary
45 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Waterloo
38 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Carleton University
37 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brock University
36 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
36 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Ege University
32 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
29 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Université Laval
27 publications, 0.42%
|
|
McMaster University
26 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Saint Mary's University
20 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Manitoba
20 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
16 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Tasmania
13 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
13 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Laurentian University
13 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Windsor
13 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Ohio State University
12 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
12 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Purdue University
12 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
11 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Victoria
11 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Université de Moncton
11 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Western University
10 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Louisville
10 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Lethbridge
9 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Florida State University
8 publications, 0.12%
|
|
American University
8 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Harvard University
8 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Delaware
8 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
7 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Georgetown University
7 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
7 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
7 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Syracuse University
6 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Trent University
6 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
6 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
6 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Columbia University
5 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Lakehead University
5 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Arizona State University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Boston College
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Prince Edward Island
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Regina
4 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Ohio University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Marquette University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Kansai University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
West Chester University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Millersville University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Brandon University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Texas Tech University
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of North Texas
3 publications, 0.05%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Liverpool
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
West Virginia University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Olivet Nazarene University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
St. Francis Xavier University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Bishop's University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Temple University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Texas at El Paso
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Reading
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Kentucky
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
Binghamton University
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Surrey
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
University of Essex
2 publications, 0.03%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Najran University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Panjab University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Loyola College
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
University of Bahrain
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
University of Ottawa
14 publications, 13.08%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
14 publications, 13.08%
|
|
York University
7 publications, 6.54%
|
|
Université Laval
7 publications, 6.54%
|
|
University of British Columbia
5 publications, 4.67%
|
|
University of Toronto
5 publications, 4.67%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 3.74%
|
|
Western University
3 publications, 2.8%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 2.8%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 2.8%
|
|
Carleton University
3 publications, 2.8%
|
|
Bishop's University
2 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
2 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
2 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Victoria
2 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Najran University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Konkuk University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Georgia State University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Okayama University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Université Paris-Est Créteil
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Brandon University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Manitoba
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of the French Antilles
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
York St John University
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Prince Edward Island
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Lethbridge
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
University of Regina
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
1 publication, 0.93%
|
|
Show all (7 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1620, 25.1%
Canada
1620 publications, 25.1%
|
USA
|
USA, 730, 11.31%
USA
730 publications, 11.31%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 33, 0.51%
Turkey
33 publications, 0.51%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 32, 0.5%
Australia
32 publications, 0.5%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 22, 0.34%
United Kingdom
22 publications, 0.34%
|
France
|
France, 8, 0.12%
France
8 publications, 0.12%
|
China
|
China, 7, 0.11%
China
7 publications, 0.11%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 7, 0.11%
Belgium
7 publications, 0.11%
|
Togo
|
Togo, 7, 0.11%
Togo
7 publications, 0.11%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 0.09%
Japan
6 publications, 0.09%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.08%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 5, 0.08%
Saudi Arabia
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 0.06%
Israel
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 0.06%
Italy
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.06%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.06%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.05%
Germany
3 publications, 0.05%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.05%
India
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.05%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.05%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.03%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.03%
Greece
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.03%
Spain
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.03%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.03%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.03%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.03%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.02%
Austria
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.02%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.02%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.02%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.02%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.02%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.02%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.02%
Libya
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.02%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.02%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.02%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Canada
|
Canada, 72, 67.29%
Canada
72 publications, 67.29%
|
USA
|
USA, 14, 13.08%
USA
14 publications, 13.08%
|
France
|
France, 3, 2.8%
France
3 publications, 2.8%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1.87%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1.87%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.93%
Austria
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.93%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.93%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 0.93%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.93%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.93%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.93%
India
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.93%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.93%
Spain
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.93%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.93%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.93%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.93%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.93%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.93%
Japan
1 publication, 0.93%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|