Gorbunova, Maria V
PhD in Chemistry
Publications
31
Citations
393
h-index
12
Concentration Laboratory
Associate Professor
Publications found: 16

Manufacturing sustainable composite building materials: from waste, to the lab, to the community
Agyeman Boateng E., Bilal M., Pandapas C., Singappuli N., Yohay E., Ismael A., Cote D., Krueger R.
Abstract
This paper describes how our team took waste plastic and coconut fibers to create a composite strong enough to be used for roof sheathing in West Africa. Part one details the necessary background and literature review, our research design, and findings from lab work conducted in the summer of 2023. In part two of the paper, we describe a pilot test of reproducing our results outside the lab in a rural Ghanaian community. Through a co-design process, the team worked in a peer-to-peer relationship with community members of Akyem Dwenase in Ghana’s Eastern Region to test the process of transforming waste plastic into roof sheathing using technology designed in Ghana. The project was borne out of a MS project in Science and Technology for Innovation in Global Development and supported by a team of undergraduates who, under the supervision of faculty, worked for seven weeks in Ghana to develop and test the prototype. The paper concludes with areas for future work.

Re-framing and enacting diversity in science education: the case of college chemistry classrooms
Picón R.O.
Abstract
Scholarship about the effectiveness of programs related to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in college suggests that increasing the presence of marginalized students does not necessarily result in producing inclusion and a sense of belonging in science. Recruiting and retaining marginalized students in science-related fields and comparing them with students from dominant groups is assimilationist because the presence of different people does not inherently create a diverse school setting. The central goal of this viewpoint paper is to propose a holistic view of diversity at the university level. Particularly, I discuss a conceptual framework that frames diversity as a process that entails inducing, orchestrating, utilizing, valuing, and honoring the heterogeneity of ways of thinking, doing, and being of individuals to learn. To translate commitments to enact diversity in daily teaching practices, specifically in the chemistry classroom, I analyze culturally relevant pedagogy as a productive tool to encourage students and instructors to develop and leverage a robust repertoire of thoughts, practices, and identities to learn disciplinary concepts and solve problems that matter to students. To support the operationalization of diversity in science classrooms in higher education, researchers and practitioners should identify and value the coexistence of different thoughts, practices, and identities in the school to create a safe and intellectually challenging learning setting where thinking, doing, and being different is an asset toward learning.

Making exploratory search engines using qualitative case studies: a mixed method implementation using interviews with Detroit Artisans
Robinson K.P., Garvin M., Eglash R., Robert L., Guzdial M., Bennett A.
Abstract
Search engine algorithms are increasingly subjects of critique, with evidence indicating their role in driving polarization, exclusion, and algorithmic social harms. Many proposed solutions take a top-down approach, with experts proposing bias-corrections. A more participatory approach may be possible, with those made vulnerable by algorithmic unfairness having a voice in how they want to be “found.” By using a mixed methods approach, we sought to develop search engine criteria from the bottom-up. In this project we worked with a group of 16 African American artisanal entrepreneurs in Detroit Michigan, with a majority female and all from low-income communities. Through regular in-depth interviews with select participants, they highlighted their important services, identities and practices. We then used causal set relations with natural language processing to match queries with their qualitative narratives. We refer to this two-step process-- deliberately focusing on social groups with unaddressed needs, and carefully translating narratives to computationally accessible forms--as a “content aware” approach. The resulting content aware search outcomes place themes that participants value, in particular greater relationality, much earlier in the list of results when compared with a standard Web search. More broadly, our use of participatory design with “content awareness” adds evidence to the importance of addressing algorithmic bias by considering who gets to address it; and, that participatory search engine criteria can be modeled as robust linkages between interviews and semantic similarity using causal set relations.

Imagining just futures through interdisciplinary pedagogies: cultivating communities of practice across the sciences and humanities
York E., May C., Breneman D.L., Yanacek H., Klevickis C., Conley S.N.
Abstract
This case study describes an experimental initiative at James Madison University funded by a National Science Foundation grant in Fall 2021 that aimed to support interdisciplinary collaborative pedagogical development related to Science, Technology, and Society (STS) with a particular focus on ethics and justice. The case study argues that creating infrastructure to cultivate and sustain small teaching communities of practice that include faculty from humanities, social sciences, and STEM fields, can support the challenging and necessary work of developing integrated STS-informed pedagogies across the curriculum. A flexible framework is examined through multiple lenses, including perspectives from each faculty participant, representing teaching departments of Biology, World Languages & Cultures, Integrated Science and Technology/Biotechnology, Justice Studies/Disability Studies, and Integrated Science and Technology/Public Interest Technology and Science. Authors provide key insights about what enables and sustains an interdisciplinary community of practice.

Demystifying artificial intelligence for the global public interest: establishing responsible AI for international development through training
Zarei Ardestani Z., Mao E., Krueger R.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a buzzword around the globe. For many, AI was once contained in high-tech labs and has now been released out into the world for the rest of us to use. Generative AI, which is what Microsoft, Apple, and OpenAI have recently offered, is only one version of AI – probably the one with the most ‘curb appeal’. In fact, AI dates to the 1950s and has offered much more banal – by today’s standards – innovations. This case study represents an effort to demystify popular notions of AI and take a first baby step toward developing AI literacy among international development practitioners. We offer two cases of courses that we developed to build appropriate bridges to the future, to show AI is not like the discovery of fire – a gift from the gods – but rather a technology that is a baby step forward in data analytics.

“The 21st century professionalization?”: online education as an instrument for bolstering individual welfare and societal equality
Huet P.
Abstract
Since the start of the last decade of the 20th century, the application of digital technologies with the potential of making substantial contributions to a community’s welfare have led to the creation of the literature of Public Interest Technologies and reinvigorated many areas of focus in the social sciences. A relevant subfield of this literature has been the application of new technologies to education to increase social public benefits. The traditional literature on higher education seems to agree that the expansion of this good throughout a society is desirable because it generates direct and indirect individual gains, as well as aggregate level social benefits in the form of positive externalities. However, some authors have argued that the acquisition of postsecondary education has its own drawbacks: unwanted intellectual influence of instructors on students, barriers to access for students of historically vulnerable sociodemographic groups, as well as students’ perception of a reduced pay-off from going to college. While there have been some indices that online higher education could abate many of these issues, there has been relatively little formal research to test this tool’s impact. Using a quantitative approach, via cross-section and time-series data analysis, the text finds some evidence that online higher education could solve many of higher education’s drawbacks, while also being a feasible approach given the current technological environment of the United States. The text concludes outlining future research using a mixed-methods approach that could be highly valuable to acquire a more comprehensive view and robust evidence of online higher education’s potential of expanding social public benefits.

Can public interest technology serve people who have disabilities?
Gran B., Bryden A.M.
Abstract
Public Interest Technology is an emerging paradigm, scholarly domain, and potential contributor to reducing barriers, mitigating discrimination, and promoting human rights of people who have disabilities. Employing data from individual interviews of people who have experienced spinal cord injury and their support persons, this project identifies obstacles and barriers these people experience when seeking technologies needed for rehabilitation and reintegration. This article discusses these individuals’ experiences in light of how public interest technology may be a game changer for people who have experienced spinal cord injuries.

Black-oriented EdTech and public interest technology: a framework for accessible and ethically designed technology for K-12 students
Campbell S.E.
Abstract
This study explores the intersection of public interest technology (PIT) and K-12 Black-oriented educational technology (EdTech) platforms in addressing educational inequities and racial biases. Despite the increased adoption of EdTech in K-12 settings, it often perpetuates racial biases, marginalizing Black students. Conversely, Black-oriented educational technology has been established to counter the marginalization of Black students by centering Black culture and realities in educational content (Young, P.A. 1999. Roads to travel: a historical look at African American contributions to instructional technology. University of California, Berkeley), emphasizing principles of ethical, accessible, and impactful technology use aligned with PIT. However, research on these digital platforms is limited. This study employs multimodal critical discourse analysis to examine three K-12 Black-oriented platforms – KaiXR, Reconstruction, and TunTimo – developed by Black women, to understand how they address technology inclusion and counteract racial biases in mainstream EdTech.

Examining generative image models amidst privacy regulations
Ismael H.
Abstract
As diffusion models emerge as a new frontier in generative AI, requiring vast image databases as their inputs, the question arises: how should regulators approach policies concerning the collection and utilization of these images? Though generative image models currently interpret the data they scrape as public, regulatory bodies have yet to confirm this as a viable understanding. This paper explores the current public/personal distinction of data as well as the respective legal standards for both categories in both the American and European context. This paper acts as a guide for regulators seeking to understand monopolization and privacy implications of confirming the validity of using open sourced images versus imagining a reality of curated or licensed datasets amidst outrage from artists over a breach of an expectation of collection/use to their artwork. Though arguments have been made regarding using copyright to protect artists, this paper seeks to explore other pathways for regulating generative image models under our current conceptual frameworks of privacy.

Frontmatter
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0


Public interest technology and why it’s important to create an outlet for it?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Quarkume A.Y.


What do college students think about artificial intelligence? We ask them
Cruz Zuniga M., Santrac N., Kwiatkowski A., Abood B.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming different aspects of the economy and society of countries. There are diverse effects when comparing the impact in developed versus developing countries. In the educational sector, efforts to incorporate AI have largely ignored the input from those directly impacted by it. This document presents results from a survey about AI to university students in Latin America. The information presented comes from a survey conducted in November 2023 to college students with ages between 18 and 25 years in four Latin American countries: Mexico, Argentina, Peru, and Ecuador. The results indicate that, in general, youth have a positive view about the potential of AI, though limited knowledge in the topic. Moreover, university students in the region do not want to be passive recipients of AI. They want to participate directly in conversations about this very current topic and have concerns about different aspects of AI implementation in the region. These findings highlight the need for universities, governments, civil society and international organizations and the private sector to work together to create spaces for inclusive dialogue where the youth could directly participate in conversations that crucially matter for their lives.

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history
Washington A.L., Cheung J.
Abstract
The public interest suggests a singular approach to a social good, but lessons from history illustrate the nuances of sharing open space, transportation networks, and policy mandates. Serving the public exists across a spectrum of possibilities. In this essay, we consider how the emerging field of public interest technology could learn from previous assumptions about who counts as the public and how benefits or harms can be overly concentrated in certain populations. We situate public interest technology as a growing capability of government public service, an institutionalized professional practice like public interest law, as well as a site of critical inquiry. Our definition of the public interest is motivated by a theory of change that recognizes the strength of inclusion. Punctuated with historic and contemporary examples, this essay argues that by acknowledging conflicts of interest and embracing the marginal, public interest technology could build ethical infrastructures to serve all.

Environmental effects of plastic pollution and sustainability: where are we now?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
Barrick A., Hoang T.


Trust and Safety work: internal governance of technology risks and harms
Shulruff T.
Abstract
Trust and Safety work mitigates certain social risks and harms of digital technologies. In a landscape that is only slowly establishing regulatory oversight mechanisms, Trust and Safety work performs a type of internal governance by attempting to mitigate disinformation, online harassment, extremism, and other harms accelerated or amplified by technology products and services. With origins in content moderation, Trust and Safety work now also includes product advice for online services and IRL (in real life) products. Attention to Trust and Safety work can complicate a monolithic view of what tech work is and who does it, as well as point to locations for intervention as we seek to promote Public Interest Technology in globally impactful sociotechnical systems.
Found
Total publications
31
Total citations
393
Citations per publication
12.68
Average publications per year
2.07
Average coauthors
4.52
Publications years
2011-2025 (15 years)
h-index
12
i10-index
13
m-index
0.8
o-index
26
g-index
19
w-index
3
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
|
Analytical Chemistry, 17, 54.84%
Analytical Chemistry
17 publications, 54.84%
|
Spectroscopy
|
Spectroscopy, 6, 19.35%
Spectroscopy
6 publications, 19.35%
|
Instrumentation
|
Instrumentation, 4, 12.9%
Instrumentation
4 publications, 12.9%
|
General Medicine
|
General Medicine, 2, 6.45%
General Medicine
2 publications, 6.45%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 2, 6.45%
Condensed Matter Physics
2 publications, 6.45%
|
General Materials Science
|
General Materials Science, 2, 6.45%
General Materials Science
2 publications, 6.45%
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
|
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2, 6.45%
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
2 publications, 6.45%
|
Materials Chemistry
|
Materials Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
Materials Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Metals and Alloys
|
Metals and Alloys, 1, 3.23%
Metals and Alloys
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 1, 3.23%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
1 publication, 3.23%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
General Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1, 3.23%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 1, 3.23%
Biochemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Inorganic Chemistry
|
Inorganic Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
Inorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
General Chemical Engineering
|
General Chemical Engineering, 1, 3.23%
General Chemical Engineering
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
|
Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
Colloid and Surface Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1, 3.23%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Polymers and Plastics
|
Polymers and Plastics, 1, 3.23%
Polymers and Plastics
1 publication, 3.23%
|
General Engineering
|
General Engineering, 1, 3.23%
General Engineering
1 publication, 3.23%
|
Environmental Chemistry
|
Environmental Chemistry, 1, 3.23%
Environmental Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Journals
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
11 publications, 35.48%
|
|
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
Talanta
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
Microchemical Journal
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
Nanotechnologies in Russia
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Gold Bulletin
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Pure and Applied Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Optics and Spectroscopy (English translation of Optika i Spektroskopiya)
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Springer Geology
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Applied Spectroscopy Reviews
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Sorbtsionnye i Khromatograficheskie Protsessy
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
67 citations, 17.01%
|
|
Microchemical Journal
25 citations, 6.35%
|
|
Talanta
16 citations, 4.06%
|
|
TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
14 citations, 3.55%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
11 citations, 2.79%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
11 citations, 2.79%
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 10, 2.54%
Journal not defined
10 citations, 2.54%
|
Molecules
8 citations, 2.03%
|
|
Microchimica Acta
8 citations, 2.03%
|
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
7 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Pure and Applied Chemistry
6 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Analytical Methods
6 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Analytical Letters
6 citations, 1.52%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
5 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Optics and Spectroscopy (English translation of Optika i Spektroskopiya)
5 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Food Chemistry
5 citations, 1.27%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography A
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Sensors
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Nanotechnologies in Russia
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
RSC Advances
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Gold Bulletin
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
The Analyst
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Luminescence
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Industrial laboratory Diagnostics of materials
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Advances in Sample Preparation
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Food Analytical Methods
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Clinica Chimica Acta
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Membranes
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Nanomaterials
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Dyes and Pigments
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Applied Nanoscience (Switzerland)
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Separation Science
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Separations
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Food Control
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Applied Spectroscopy Reviews
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Electrophoresis
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Журнал аналитической химии
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Separation Science Plus
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Green Analytical Chemistry
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Water and Environment Journal
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Nanoscale
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Inorganic and Nano-Metal Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Biomedical Chromatography
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Laser Physics
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Trends in Food Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Analytical Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Nanoscale Horizons
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Chemical Papers
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Recognition
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Farmatsiya i Farmakologiya
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Research
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Biosensors
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Environmental Research
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Science and Technology of Archaeological Research
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Optics and Laser Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Dalton Transactions
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Lipid Research
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Chemical Communications
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Electrocatalysis
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Electroanalysis
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Polymers
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Micro and Nano Systems Letters
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Photonics
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Supramolecular Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Functional Foods
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Minerals, Metals and Materials Series
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
13 publications, 41.94%
|
|
Elsevier
10 publications, 32.26%
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 6.45%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Voronezh State University
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Organizations from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
28 publications, 90.32%
|
|
![]() Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
10 publications, 32.26%
|
|
Institute of Chemical Reagents and High Purity Chemical Substances of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
5 publications, 16.13%
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 3, 9.68%
Organization not defined
3 publications, 9.68%
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
3 publications, 9.68%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
Pushchino State Institute of Natural Sciences
1 publication, 3.23%
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Countries from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 28, 90.32%
Russia
28 publications, 90.32%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 4, 12.9%
Country not defined
4 publications, 12.9%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 71, 18.07%
Organization not defined
71 citations, 18.07%
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
50 citations, 12.72%
|
|
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
19 citations, 4.83%
|
|
Vladimir State University
12 citations, 3.05%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
11 citations, 2.8%
|
|
Institute of Chemical Reagents and High Purity Chemical Substances of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
11 citations, 2.8%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
10 citations, 2.54%
|
|
Federal Center for Animal Health
7 citations, 1.78%
|
|
University of Tabriz
5 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Saratov State University
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Ain Shams University
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
4 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Kazan National Research Technological University
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
MIREA — Russian Technological University
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Hunan Institute of Science and Technology
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Mansoura University
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Universidad Nacional del Sur
3 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Southern Federal University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Al-Baha University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University of Delhi
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Islamic Azad University of Tabriz
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Urmia University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University of Zabol
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Yasouj University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Peking University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Sichuan University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University of Liège
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Fujian Normal University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Jiangnan University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Shanxi Agricultural University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Cairo University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University of Catania
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Khon Kaen University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Walailak University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ramkhamhaeng University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
University of Valencia
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Kafrelsheikh University
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
École de Technologie Supérieure
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Universidade Federal Fluminense
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Université de Montréal
2 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
![]() Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
North Caucasus Federal University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Siberian State Medical University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Kuban State University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Chelyabinsk State University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Rostov State Medical University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
National University of Oil and Gas «Gubkin University»
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Pushchino State Institute of Natural Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Sochi State University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Voronezh State University of Engineering Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Alfaisal University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Ankara University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Umm al-Qura University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Taibah University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Islamic University of Madinah
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
University of Tehran
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Istanbul University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Gazi University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Bharathiar University
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat
1 citation, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Citing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 90, 22.9%
Russia
90 citations, 22.9%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 63, 16.03%
Country not defined
63 citations, 16.03%
|
China
|
China, 55, 13.99%
China
55 citations, 13.99%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 25, 6.36%
Iran
25 citations, 6.36%
|
USA
|
USA, 18, 4.58%
USA
18 citations, 4.58%
|
India
|
India, 18, 4.58%
India
18 citations, 4.58%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 16, 4.07%
Egypt
16 citations, 4.07%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 3.05%
Spain
12 citations, 3.05%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 2.54%
Brazil
10 citations, 2.54%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 8, 2.04%
Saudi Arabia
8 citations, 2.04%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 1.78%
Thailand
7 citations, 1.78%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 1.78%
Turkey
7 citations, 1.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 1.53%
Canada
6 citations, 1.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 5, 1.27%
Germany
5 citations, 1.27%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 5, 1.27%
Australia
5 citations, 1.27%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 1.27%
Italy
5 citations, 1.27%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4, 1.02%
United Kingdom
4 citations, 1.02%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 1.02%
Republic of Korea
4 citations, 1.02%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.76%
Argentina
3 citations, 0.76%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.76%
Belgium
3 citations, 0.76%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.76%
Greece
3 citations, 0.76%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.76%
Poland
3 citations, 0.76%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.51%
Ukraine
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.51%
Austria
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.51%
Indonesia
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.51%
Iraq
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.51%
Nigeria
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.51%
Netherlands
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.51%
Pakistan
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.51%
Czech Republic
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.51%
Sweden
2 citations, 0.51%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.51%
South Africa
2 citations, 0.51%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.51%
Japan
2 citations, 0.51%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.25%
France
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.25%
Bulgaria
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.25%
Hungary
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.25%
Ghana
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.25%
Lebanon
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.25%
Malaysia
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.25%
Morocco
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.25%
Mexico
1 citation, 0.25%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.25%
New Zealand
1 citation, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.25%
UAE
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.25%
Singapore
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.25%
Finland
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.25%
Croatia
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.25%
Switzerland
1 citation, 0.25%
|
Show all (17 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.