volume 106 pages 1-11

Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.499
CiteScore25.3
Impact factor9.8
ISSN01482963, 18737978
Marketing
Abstract
Organizational ambidexterity in a firm is significantly influenced by the behavioural integration of the Top Management Team (TMT). Researchers observe that ambidextrous firms are associated with two dimensions of dexterity, namely, balanced and combined dimensions. However, studies do not explain the varied effects of behaviourally integrated TMTs on the different dimensions of ambidexterity. A clear understanding of this relationship will help firms choose the specific TMT processes needed to facilitate specific dimensions of ambidexterity. We address this research gap and test our research model with structural equation analyses on data collected from 78 SMEs. We observe that behavioural integration processes mostly enhance a firm's combined ambidexterity. Further, we find that combined ambidexterity completely mediates the relationship between behavioural integration and firm performance. Our study adds to the literature on ambidexterity, micro-foundations, and the theory of behavioural integration, and guides small firms in their choices of behavioural and innovation practices.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Journal of Business Research
13 publications, 15.12%
European Journal of Innovation Management
4 publications, 4.65%
Sustainability
3 publications, 3.49%
International Journal of Production Economics
3 publications, 3.49%
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
3 publications, 3.49%
Journal of Knowledge Management
2 publications, 2.33%
International Journal of Emerging Markets
2 publications, 2.33%
Business Process Management Journal
2 publications, 2.33%
Journal of Technology Transfer
2 publications, 2.33%
SAGE Open
2 publications, 2.33%
Long Range Planning
2 publications, 2.33%
Thunderbird International Business Review
2 publications, 2.33%
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
2 publications, 2.33%
Review of International Business and Strategy
1 publication, 1.16%
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Management History
1 publication, 1.16%
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
1 publication, 1.16%
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
1 publication, 1.16%
International Journal of Engineering Business Management
1 publication, 1.16%
Human Relations
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
1 publication, 1.16%
European Business Review
1 publication, 1.16%
Asian Business and Management
1 publication, 1.16%
Group Decision and Negotiation
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
1 publication, 1.16%
Sustainability Science
1 publication, 1.16%
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
1 publication, 1.16%
Industrial Marketing Management
1 publication, 1.16%
International Journal of Hospitality Management
1 publication, 1.16%
International Business Review
1 publication, 1.16%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
24 publications, 27.91%
Emerald
18 publications, 20.93%
Springer Nature
10 publications, 11.63%
Taylor & Francis
8 publications, 9.3%
SAGE
7 publications, 8.14%
MDPI
5 publications, 5.81%
Wiley
4 publications, 4.65%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 publications, 3.49%
AOSIS
1 publication, 1.16%
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
1 publication, 1.16%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.16%
Virtus Interpress
1 publication, 1.16%
American Accounting Association
1 publication, 1.16%
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
1 publication, 1.16%
State University of Management
1 publication, 1.16%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
86
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Venugopal A. et al. Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration // Journal of Business Research. 2020. Vol. 106. pp. 1-11.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Venugopal A., Krishnan T., Upadhyayula R. S., Kumar M. G. Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration // Journal of Business Research. 2020. Vol. 106. pp. 1-11.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049
TI - Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration
T2 - Journal of Business Research
AU - Venugopal, Aparna
AU - Krishnan, T.N.
AU - Upadhyayula, Rajesh Srinivas
AU - Kumar, M. Girish
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/01/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 1-11
VL - 106
SN - 0148-2963
SN - 1873-7978
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Venugopal,
author = {Aparna Venugopal and T.N. Krishnan and Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula and M. Girish Kumar},
title = {Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration},
journal = {Journal of Business Research},
year = {2020},
volume = {106},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049},
pages = {1--11},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049}
}