Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
5.1
SJR
1.462
CiteScore
11.3
Categories
Ecology
Geography, Planning and Development
Global and Planetary Change
Health (social science)
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Environmental Science
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2006-2025
journal names
Sustainability Science
SUSTAIN SCI
Top-3 citing journals

Sustainability Science
(3907 citations)

Sustainability
(3771 citations)

Journal of Cleaner Production
(1180 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Tokyo
(158 publications)

United Nations University
(66 publications)

Leuphana University of Lüneburg
(62 publications)

University of Tokyo
(70 publications)

Leuphana University of Lüneburg
(41 publications)

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
(31 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 5708
Q1

Karyotype evolution and speciation in Orthoptera
Palacios-Gimenez O.M., Castillo E.R., Schielzeth H.
Abstract
Karyotype evolution might fuel speciation and can thereby contribute to species diversity. To test the hypothesis that speciation and karyotype change are linked, we estimated anagenetic and cladogenetic rates of karyotype evolution as well as speciation rates in Orthoptera. We compiled the male diploid chromosome number and the number of visible chromosome arms (the fundamental number) from published sources for 1,541 species. Chromosome-associated speciation rates were estimated by jointly modeling cladogenetic and anagenetic character evolution and the phylogenetic birth-death process in a Bayesian statistical framework using a subset of 516 species from 14 families. Our findings unveiled heterogeneity among orthopteran families in the pace of karyotype evolution and whether it was linked to speciation. In 6/14 clades we found evidence supporting speciation-associated (cladogenetic) karyotype changes, while in 6/14 clades karyotype evolution was primarily anagenetic. The remaining clades (2/14) showed uncertainty in favor of either model. We further analysed whether flightless phenotype, and thus less mobile species, showed higher rates of karyotype evolution. We showed that the flightless phenotype is associated with the rate of chromosome loss. The finding indicates contrasting patterns of karyotype evolution within specific orthopteran lineages, thus emphasizing substantial diversity in the pace of this evolutionary process. It also implies that substantial changes in chromosome number, arising from instances of chromosomal gains and losses, are recurring events in orthopterans that are associated with reproductive isolation and speciation, at least in some groups.
Q1

Correction to: The effects of parasitism on sex allocation of a hermaphroditic acorn barnacle
Q1
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Inbreeding depression in male reproductive traits
Vasudeva R., Sales K., Gage M.J., Hosken D.J.
Abstract
Inbreeding frequently leads to inbreeding depression, a general reduction in trait values and loss of fitness, and it appears that some sexually selected traits are especially sensitive to inbreeding, but sperm may be an exception. Additionally, because inbreeding depression is always in the direction of low fitness, it can reveal the direction of past selection acting on trait values. Here, we experimentally manipulate levels of inbreeding in a beetle (Tribolium castaneum) by full-sib mating for six generations. This breeding design allowed us to track the effects of increasing homozygosity on male reproductive traits (sperm and testes size), male size and lifespan, and reproductive output within inbred families, and on the heritability of these traits. All traits measured showed significant inbreeding depression and heritabilities tended to increase with inbreeding. Since inbreeding resulted in shorter sperm and smaller testes, it suggests that longer sperm and larger testes confer higher fitness in this beetle.
Q1

Behavioural vs. physiological adaptation: which contributes more to the evolution of complex traits in a warming climate?
Crowther C., Schwanz L.E.
Abstract
Through behavioural adaptation, organisms can alter their environment, and consequently, their exposure to selective pressures. In contrast, physiological traits adapt by accommodating environmental influences. Here, we examine how the coevolution of behavioural and physiological traits is shaped by their different relationships to the environment by modelling the adaptation of species with temperature-dependent sex determination to climate change. In these species, pivotal temperature and maternal nesting behaviour can evolve in response to rising temperatures that destabilise sex ratios. We used individual-based simulation modelling to ascertain the relative response to selection of these traits and determine how temperature-dependent embryonic survival and behavioural plasticity influence their coevolution. We found that pivotal temperature evolved to ameliorate sex-ratio bias more readily than nesting behaviour, though behaviour played an important role in adaptation to extreme environments. Selection favoured increased behavioural evolution when embryonic survival depended on nest temperature, while plasticity reduced the adaptive potential of behaviour. We demonstrate that the capacity of behavioural traits to respond to multiple selective pressures has a substantial impact on the coevolution of behavioural and physiological traits. Our findings highlight the complex interactions that occur when species adapt to new environments and the potential for plasticity to shape the course of evolution.
Q1

Investigation of sex determination in African cichlids reveals lack of fixed sex chromosomes in wild populations
Smith S.H., Kukowka S., Böhne A.
Abstract
Sex chromosomes are theorized to stop recombining and become fixed, yet many taxa show ambiguous genomic signals of sex consistent with either continuous recombination or sex chromosome turnover. Elucidating the basis of sex chromosome conservation or alternatively, turnover, requires comparative studies among natural populations with shared evolutionary histories. The African Great Lake radiations of cichlid fishes display an outstanding propensity to rapidly evolve novel sex-linked regions, yet older cichlid lineages external to these radiations seem to show conservation of a few sex chromosomes. Here, we studied sex-determining regions of species uniquely representing two older lineages within Lake Tanganyika; Oreochromis tanganicae (Oreochromini) and Tylochromis polylepis (Tylochromini). Using a combined SNP- and kmer-based approach, we confirm a ZW system on linkage group (LG) 3 in O. tanganicae, but not the previously proposed sex-determining gene. However, in T. polylepis, no clear region of sex-association could be identified, although kmer-based analyses point towards LG12 as a candidate sex chromosome. Additionally, we investigated four other species from older, non-East African radiation lineages and confirmed LG3 to be frequently associated with sex, but also found stronger signals of sex association on different chromosomes not previously discovered. Combined, these results suggest that homomorphic sex chromosomes are a feature of African cichlids at large. LG3 frequently harbours regions of sex-linkage, but is often polygenic with more strongly sex-linked regions on other chromosomes, possibly denoting its ancestral function as sex-determining across African cichlids, that leaves traces as novel sex-determining regions emerge. Our investigation captures this in a phylogenetic context, from emergence to fixation, or turnover to a new sex chromosome.
Q1

Altruism or Selfishness: Floral behavior based on genetic relatedness with neighboring plants
Tomizuka H., Yamawo A., Tachiki Y.
Abstract
Kin recognition in plants may lead to plastic changes in their behavior, such as altering their floral display size. In this study, we conducted evolutionary simulations of the two floral tactics utilized by plants depending on the genetic relatedness of their neighboring plants. We found that the evolutionary consequences of the floral display size in plants can be classified into four types, based on whether the floral display size increased or decreased in comparison with the case plants disable of kin recognition. As a typical result, the plants that grew with kin behaved altruistically by increasing their floral display size, whereas those that coexisted with strangers behaved selfishly by reducing their floral display size, as is observed in the field. The kin recognition and resultant evolution of the floral display size had the spillover effect on the population scale. Kin recognition generally increased the intraspecific variation in the floral display size and seed production, and decreased the genetic diversity of plant populations.
Q1

Predictable ecological dynamics over incredibly small spatial scales influence early-life phenotypes in a species with temperature-dependent sex determination
Terebiznik M., Leivesley J.A., Edge C.B., Nancekivell E.G., Brooks R.J., Rollinson N.
Abstract
Phenotype-environment associations in neonatal animals may arise in wild environments by virtue of ecological dynamics within the nest. Such dynamics may be of special importance to the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), an enigmatic trait which can be adaptive when the incubation temperatures that affect sexual differentiation also have differential effects on fitness of the sexes. To infer causal effects of the nest environment on fitness-relevant phenotypes, we apply structural equation modeling (SEM) to a 14-year dataset of 3085 individual embryos whose position in 179 wild snapping turtle nests could be estimated. We find that temperature has a positive effect on hatchling size, and that the same temperatures that predict hatchling size also predict sex of hatchlings. Further, the probability that embryos develop as males is correlated with hatchling size in the wild, where across all environments, males are slightly and significantly larger than females at hatching. Our SEM reveals that the covariance between size and sex arises because of temperature effects on size, and because of a predictable covariance between egg placement within the nest coupled with maternal effects on egg size. Finally, embryos deep in the nest have a high probability of becoming male even in the hottest years. Our study suggests ecological dynamics occurring within the nest are an interesting and underappreciated source of phenotypic variation. Our study also supports the view that TSD is an adaptive trait, rather than a neutral trait, by showing consistent associations between phenotype and temperature in wild nests of a TSD reptile.
Q1

Assessing the impact of pedigree attributes on the validity of quantitative genetic parameter estimates
Mawass W., Milot E.
Abstract
Investigating the evolution of complex traits in nature requires accurate assessment of their genetic basis. Quantitative genetic (QG) modeling is frequently applied to estimate the additive genetic variance (VA) in traits, combining phenotypic and pedigree data from a sample of individuals. Whether reconstructed from social links or molecular markers, empirical pedigrees differ in completeness, genealogical error rates and other attributes that can impact QG estimation. Here we investigate this impact using human genealogical data for six French-Canadian (FC) populations originating from the same genetic founding source but differing in their pedigrees’ attributes. First, we simulated phenotypic values along pedigrees and under different trait architecture and ‘true’ parameter values (e.g. VA). Then we fitted mixed effects ‘animal’ models to these simulated data, to assess how QG estimation was impacted by pedigree attributes. Our results show that pedigree size and depth were important determinants of the precision, but not accuracy, of genetic parameter estimates. In contrast, pedigree completeness and entropy, two attributes related to the density of genealogical links, were not clearly associated with the performance of parameter estimation. Noticeably, a slight increase in the genealogical error rate was sufficient to cause a detectable underestimation of VA. Including maternal genetic effects into the simulations lead to a slight underestimation of VA with pedigrees of smaller size and depth. Despite originating from the same genetic source, the six pedigrees yielded wide variations in QG estimates under identical conditions. These findings highlight the importance of sensitivity analyses in pedigree-based genetic studies on natural populations.
Q1

The effects of parasitism on sex allocation of a hermaphroditic acorn barnacle
Tamechika M.M., Yamada H., Ijiri S., Yusa Y.
Abstract
Sex allocation theory predicts the adaptive allocation of resources to male versus female reproduction in simultaneous hermaphrodites in response to individual characteristics or environmental factors. Because parasites uptake resources from their hosts, their presence could affect the sex allocation of the hosts. We investigated the effects of infestation status and infestation intensity by the rhizocephalan barnacle Boschmaella japonica on reproduction, including sex allocation, of the host intertidal barnacle Chthamalus challengeri. Feeding activity was also examined as a factor related to resource intake. Both male and female reproductive investment decreased with increasing parasite infestation, and the sex allocation of large infested hosts was more male-biased than that of large uninfested hosts. Moreover, in contrast to the model prediction that male investment does not change under resource limitation, male investment decreased in infested hosts whose resources were taken by parasites. This reduction in male investment could be explained by changes in mating group size, since infested hosts have shorter penises and consequently are able to access fewer mating partners.
Q1

Correction to: Spatial sorting caused by downstream dispersal: implication for morphological evolution in isolated populations of fat minnow inhabiting small streams flowing through terraced rice paddies
Q1
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Female oviposition decisions are influenced by the microbial environment
Fowler E.K., Friend L.A., Churchill E.R., Yu D.W., Archetti M., Bourke A.F., Bretman A., Chapman T.
Abstract
In ovipositing animals, egg placement decisions can be key determinants of offspring survival. One oviposition strategy reported across taxa is laying eggs in clusters. In some species, mothers provision eggs with diffusible defence compounds, such as antimicrobials, raising the possibility of public good benefits arising from egg clustering. Here we report that Drosophila melanogaster females frequently lay eggs in mixed maternity clusters. We tested two hypotheses for potential drivers of this oviposition behaviour: (i) the microbial environment affects fecundity and egg placement in groups of females; (ii) eggs exhibit antimicrobial activity. The results partially supported the first hypothesis. Females reduced egg laying, but did not alter egg clustering, on non-sterile substrates that had been naturally colonised with microbes from the environment. However, oviposition remained unaffected when the substrate community consisted of commensal (fly-associated) microbes. The second hypothesis was not supported. There was no evidence of antimicrobial activity, either in whole eggs or in soluble egg surface material. In conclusion, while we found no behavioural or physiological evidence that egg clustering decisions are shaped by the opportunity to share antimicrobials, females are sensitive to their microbial environment and can adjust egg laying rates accordingly.
Q1

Walking or hanging: the role of habitat use for body shape evolution in lacertid lizards
Vicent-Castelló P., Herrel A., Harris D.J., Kaliontzopoulou A.
Abstract
Differences in habitat use impose ecological constraints which in turn lead to functional and morphological differences through adaptation. In fact, a convergent evolutionary pattern is evident when species exhibit similar responses to similar environments. In this study we examine how habitat use influences the evolution of body shape in lizards from the family Lacertidae. We divided our species set into two categories: ground-dwellers and climbers, which encompasses the verticality and horizontality aspects of the habitat. We performed phylogenetic comparative analyses employing 186 species and seven linear morphological traits. Our results show contrasting patterns between head and limb shape, which are considered distinct functional blocks. We observed differences in forelimb proportions, but not in hindlimb length, contrary to what was documented in other lizard groups, demonstrating a novel axis in the limb-locomotion-habitat relationship in this family. In addition, a clear effect of habitat use on head shape was detected. We observed that climbing species present on average flatter heads than ground-dwelling species, as well as different evolutionary trajectories. These findings suggest the complex interplay between habitat use and morphological evolution in lizards, highlighting how distinct selective pressures drive divergent adaptations in different functional traits
Q1

Environmental stress differentially affects phenotypic modularity and fluctuating asymmetry in generalist and specialist cactophilic Drosophila
Vrdoljak J., Soto I.M., Carreira V.P., Padró J.
Abstract
Modularity and developmental (in)stability have the potential to influence phenotype production and, consequently, the evolutionary trajectories of species. Depending on the environmental factors involved and the buffering capacity of an organism, different developmental outcomes are expected. Cactophilic Drosophila species provide an established eco-evolutionary model with well-studied ecological conditions, making them ideal for studying these phenomena. Here, we investigated how variations in larval diet and exposure to alkaloids on primary and secondary host plants affect the degree of integration/modularity and fluctuating asymmetry (FA, a proxy for developmental instability) of wing shape in two sibling species with different degrees of specialisation: Drosophila buzzatii (generalist) and Drosophila koepferae (specialist). Additionally, we compared the anterior–posterior modular configuration with a recently proposed proximal–distal modular configuration. Our results revealed greater independence among proximal–distal modules compared to anterior–posterior modules. Moreover, we observed sex-specific responses, with males exhibiting greater susceptibility to stressful environments than females. Each species showed a particular trait pattern across treatments: D. buzzatii showed increased integration and FA when reared in a nutrient-poor, alkaloid-rich secondary host, while D. koepferae displayed similar responses in novel environments characterised by double doses of alkaloids on the secondary host plant. These findings align with the generalist-specialist paradigm, suggesting that specialists may be challenged by novel environments, whereas generalists may be more affected by stressful conditions. Our study highlights the importance of considering each part of the proximal–distal wing axis independently, and the need to consider ecological-evolutionary history when investigating the relationship between complex phenotypic traits and environmental stress.
Q1

Walnut PR10/Bet v1-like proteins interact with chitinase in response to anthracnose stress
Wang T., Xie M., Hou S., Ma J., Lin Y., Chen S., Li D., Yang G.
Abstract
Walnut is a significant woody oil tree species that has been increasingly affected by anthracnose in recent years. Effective anthracnose control is crucial for walnut yield and quality, which requires a comprehensive understanding of the response mechanisms to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. The PR10/Bet v1-like proteins are involved in defense against various disease, therefore, in this study, 7 JrBet v1s were identified from the walnut transcriptome (named JrBet v1-1~1-7), whose open reading frame (ORF) was 414~483 bp in length with isoelectric point ranging from 4.96 to 6.11. These JrBet v1s were classified into three groups, with the MLP/RRP and Dicot PR-10 subfamilies each comprising three members (the largest ones), indicating that the proteins within these two subfamilies may have evolved from a shared ancestral gene within the broader PR10/Bet v1 protein family. The cis-elements in the promoters of JrBet v1s were involved in response to hormones, coercive, and plant growth metabolism. Most JrBet v1s could be significantly upregulated by walnut anthracnose, JrBet v1-1, JrBet v1-2, JrBet v1-4, and JrBet v1-6 peaked at 12 days of anthracnose stress, showing a 2.85- to 63.12-fold increase compared to the control, while JrBet v1-3, JrBet v1-5 and JrBet v1-7 peaked at 9 days, with a 3.23- to 27.67-fold increase. Furthermore, the significant corelation of the upregulation under anthracnose stress of JrBet v1s and JrChit02-1 as well as JrChit02-2, the genes encoding chitinase, suggesting that during the long process of microevolution in walnut-C. gloeosporioides interactions, walnut has developed a Bet v1-chitinase defense mechanism to counteract pathogen invasion.
Q1

Short INDELs and SNPs as markers of evolutionary processes in hybrid zones
Perini S., Johannesson K., Butlin R.K., Westram A.M.
Abstract
Polymorphic short insertions and deletions (INDELs ≤ 50 bp) are abundant, although less common than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Evidence from model organisms shows INDELs to be more strongly influenced by purifying selection than SNPs. Partly for this reason, INDELs are rarely used as markers for demographic processes or to detect divergent selection. Here, we compared INDELs and SNPs in the intertidal snail Littorina saxatilis, focussing on hybrid zones between ecotypes, in order to test the utility of INDELs in the detection of divergent selection. We computed INDEL and SNP site frequency spectra using capture sequencing data. We assessed the impact of divergent selection by analyzing allele frequency clines across habitat boundaries. We also examined the influence of GC-biased gene conversion because it may be confounded with signatures of selection. We show evidence that short INDELs are affected more by purifying selection than SNPs, but part of the observed site frequency spectra difference can be attributed to GC-biased gene conversion. We did not find a difference in the impact of divergent selection between short INDELs and SNPs. Short INDELs and SNPs were similarly distributed across the genome and so are likely to respond to indirect selection in the same way. A few regions likely affected by divergent selection were revealed by INDELs and not by SNPs. Short INDELs can be useful (additional) genetic markers helping to identify genomic regions important for adaptation and population divergence.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Sustainability Science
3907 citations, 7.82%
|
|
Sustainability
3771 citations, 7.55%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1180 citations, 2.36%
|
|
Environmental Science and Policy
708 citations, 1.42%
|
|
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
553 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
413 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
412 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Sustainable Development
405 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
403 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Ecological Economics
325 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Land
317 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Energy Research and Social Science
299 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Global Environmental Change
278 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Ecosystems and People
266 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
250 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Futures
229 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Regional Environmental Change
221 citations, 0.44%
|
|
World Sustainability Series
218 citations, 0.44%
|
|
People and Nature
211 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Ocean and Coastal Management
207 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
205 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Ambio
203 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Land Use Policy
203 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Energies
196 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
185 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
183 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Environmental Education Research
177 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
175 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
175 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
170 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Environmental Research Letters
170 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Ecosystem Services
168 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
152 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Sustainable Development Goals Series
146 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Climatic Change
145 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Heliyon
139 citations, 0.28%
|
|
PLoS ONE
139 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Marine Policy
135 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
133 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
131 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
129 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
128 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
126 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Environmental Management
123 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Natural Hazards
120 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Sustainable Production and Consumption
118 citations, 0.24%
|
|
One Earth
113 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Sustainable Cities and Society
108 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Scientific Reports
108 citations, 0.22%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
108 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
108 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
105 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Remote Sensing
105 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Nature Sustainability
104 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
104 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainability
101 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Landscape and Urban Planning
99 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Forest Policy and Economics
98 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Global Sustainability
98 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Discover Sustainability
94 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
93 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
88 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Climate Risk Management
86 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
85 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Climate and Development
84 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Rural Studies
83 citations, 0.17%
|
|
SDGs in the European Region
82 citations, 0.16%
|
|
World Development
81 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
80 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Local Environment
80 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Development
80 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
79 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Forests
75 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Energy Policy
72 citations, 0.14%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
72 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
70 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agricultural Systems
70 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Earth's Future
69 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Agriculture and Human Values
69 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Biological Conservation
66 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
65 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Cities
65 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
64 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
62 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Frontiers in Climate
62 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
60 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Geoforum
59 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Earth System Governance
58 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
56 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
56 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Extractive Industries and Society
55 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
54 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Applied Geography
54 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
53 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
52 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Science for Sustainable Societies
52 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Education Sciences
51 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Conservation Biology
50 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Society and Natural Resources
50 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
49 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
|
Elsevier
12465 citations, 24.96%
|
|
Springer Nature
12072 citations, 24.17%
|
|
MDPI
6265 citations, 12.54%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3569 citations, 7.15%
|
|
Wiley
2803 citations, 5.61%
|
|
Emerald
1478 citations, 2.96%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1378 citations, 2.76%
|
|
SAGE
1008 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
795 citations, 1.59%
|
|
IOP Publishing
492 citations, 0.99%
|
|
IGI Global
482 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Oxford University Press
365 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
340 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
245 citations, 0.49%
|
|
EDP Sciences
167 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
156 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
120 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Copernicus
100 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Annual Reviews
94 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
94 citations, 0.19%
|
|
The Royal Society
89 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
83 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IWA Publishing
82 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
68 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SciELO
65 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
64 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Bristol University Press
63 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
62 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
61 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
55 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
55 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
54 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
54 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AIP Publishing
53 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of California Press
50 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
50 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
49 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
45 citations, 0.09%
|
|
F1000 Research
45 citations, 0.09%
|
|
OpenEdition
44 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
42 citations, 0.08%
|
|
National Biological Information Infrastructure
42 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AOSIS
41 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
40 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
38 citations, 0.08%
|
|
BMJ
34 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
33 citations, 0.07%
|
|
World Scientific
31 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
29 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
29 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CAIRN
29 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cogitatio
27 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
25 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH
24 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
24 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Science of South Africa
23 citations, 0.05%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
23 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
19 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
18 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MIT Press
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
White Horse Press
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Inc.
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Thomas Telford
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
13 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Surey Beatty & Sons
13 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Berghahn Books
13 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Mountain Society (IMS) and United Nations University
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
JMIR Publications
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Western Studies
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASME International
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brill
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Science Support Foundation
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Index Copernicus
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico, Faculty of Chemistry
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brazilian Association for Ecological Science and Conservation
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Water Environment Federation
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Society for Engineering Education
7 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
University of Tokyo
158 publications, 9.89%
|
|
United Nations University
66 publications, 4.13%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
62 publications, 3.88%
|
|
Stockholm University
56 publications, 3.51%
|
|
Arizona State University
51 publications, 3.19%
|
|
National Institute for Environmental Studies
49 publications, 3.07%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
46 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
40 publications, 2.5%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
39 publications, 2.44%
|
|
ETH Zurich
37 publications, 2.32%
|
|
Kyoto University
35 publications, 2.19%
|
|
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
35 publications, 2.19%
|
|
Osaka University
34 publications, 2.13%
|
|
Kyushu University
31 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Utrecht University
28 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Lund University
27 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Melbourne
26 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Helsinki
24 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Bern
24 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Sussex
23 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
22 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
22 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Oxford
21 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Cape Town
20 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
20 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
20 publications, 1.25%
|
|
James Cook University
19 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
18 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Australian National University
17 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of British Columbia
17 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Waterloo
17 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
17 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
17 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Cornell University
16 publications, 1%
|
|
Tohoku University
16 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Göttingen
16 publications, 1%
|
|
Ibaraki University
16 publications, 1%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University College London
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Monash University
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Hokkaido University
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Kassel
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Harvard University
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
McGill University
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of York
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of New South Wales
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Cambridge
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Southampton
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Glasgow
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Queensland
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Deakin University
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Wollongong
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Hiroshima University
13 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Nottingham
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Hamburg University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Exeter
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Ritsumeikan University
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Zurich
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Western Australia
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Kochi University of Technology
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Lisbon
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Oslo
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National University of Singapore
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Adelaide
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Tasmania
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Michigan
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Leiden University
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Groningen
9 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Twente
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Columbia University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of California, Davis
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Arizona
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Keio University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Hohenheim
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Osnabrück University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
University of Tokyo
70 publications, 8.42%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
41 publications, 4.93%
|
|
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
31 publications, 3.73%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
31 publications, 3.73%
|
|
National Institute for Environmental Studies
27 publications, 3.25%
|
|
Stockholm University
25 publications, 3.01%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
25 publications, 3.01%
|
|
ETH Zurich
23 publications, 2.77%
|
|
Kyoto University
21 publications, 2.53%
|
|
Arizona State University
19 publications, 2.29%
|
|
Utrecht University
19 publications, 2.29%
|
|
United Nations University
18 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
17 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Lund University
16 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Melbourne
16 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Kyushu University
15 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Helsinki
14 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of Göttingen
14 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of Kassel
14 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of Sussex
14 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Bern
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Oxford
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Osaka University
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
13 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Glasgow
12 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
12 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Deakin University
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of British Columbia
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Waterloo
11 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Hiroshima University
10 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
10 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of New South Wales
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Oslo
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
James Cook University
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
9 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Lisbon
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University College London
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Cambridge
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Harvard University
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
McGill University
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Leiden University
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of York
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
8 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Twente
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Australian National University
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Nottingham
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Cape Town
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Arizona
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Michigan
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Hokkaido University
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Osnabrück University
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Liège
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Bergen
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Western Australia
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Wollongong
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Tohoku University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Hamburg University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Greifswald
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Groningen
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ritsumeikan University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Kochi University of Technology
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Shiga Prefecture
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Cranfield University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Loughborough University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Auckland
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Monash University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Padjadjaran University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Oregon State University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Japan
|
Japan, 331, 20.73%
Japan
331 publications, 20.73%
|
USA
|
USA, 327, 20.48%
USA
327 publications, 20.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 298, 18.66%
Germany
298 publications, 18.66%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 236, 14.78%
United Kingdom
236 publications, 14.78%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 169, 10.58%
Australia
169 publications, 10.58%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 140, 8.77%
Sweden
140 publications, 8.77%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 136, 8.52%
Netherlands
136 publications, 8.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 109, 6.83%
Canada
109 publications, 6.83%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 97, 6.07%
Spain
97 publications, 6.07%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 97, 6.07%
Switzerland
97 publications, 6.07%
|
France
|
France, 81, 5.07%
France
81 publications, 5.07%
|
China
|
China, 81, 5.07%
China
81 publications, 5.07%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 75, 4.7%
Austria
75 publications, 4.7%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 55, 3.44%
Italy
55 publications, 3.44%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 52, 3.26%
South Africa
52 publications, 3.26%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 49, 3.07%
Finland
49 publications, 3.07%
|
India
|
India, 48, 3.01%
India
48 publications, 3.01%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 36, 2.25%
New Zealand
36 publications, 2.25%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 34, 2.13%
Brazil
34 publications, 2.13%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 28, 1.75%
Norway
28 publications, 1.75%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 27, 1.69%
Portugal
27 publications, 1.69%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 25, 1.57%
Belgium
25 publications, 1.57%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 23, 1.44%
Mexico
23 publications, 1.44%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 21, 1.31%
Indonesia
21 publications, 1.31%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 21, 1.31%
Kenya
21 publications, 1.31%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 20, 1.25%
Chile
20 publications, 1.25%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 18, 1.13%
Denmark
18 publications, 1.13%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 16, 1%
Ghana
16 publications, 1%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 16, 1%
Colombia
16 publications, 1%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 15, 0.94%
Argentina
15 publications, 0.94%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 0.94%
Malaysia
15 publications, 0.94%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 15, 0.94%
Czech Republic
15 publications, 0.94%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 14, 0.88%
Vietnam
14 publications, 0.88%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 13, 0.81%
Singapore
13 publications, 0.81%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 11, 0.69%
Thailand
11 publications, 0.69%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 10, 0.63%
Bangladesh
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 10, 0.63%
Greece
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 10, 0.63%
Philippines
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 10, 0.63%
Ethiopia
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 9, 0.56%
Ireland
9 publications, 0.56%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 9, 0.56%
Poland
9 publications, 0.56%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 8, 0.5%
Peru
8 publications, 0.5%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 8, 0.5%
Republic of Korea
8 publications, 0.5%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 0.44%
Turkey
7 publications, 0.44%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 6, 0.38%
Lebanon
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 5, 0.31%
Hungary
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.31%
Egypt
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.31%
Israel
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 5, 0.31%
Costa Rica
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 5, 0.31%
Ecuador
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.25%
Iran
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 4, 0.25%
Cameroon
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.25%
Romania
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 4, 0.25%
Trinidad and Tobago
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 4, 0.25%
Fiji
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.19%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.19%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 3, 0.19%
Senegal
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.19%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.19%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 3, 0.19%
Sri Lanka
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.13%
Russia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.13%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.13%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.13%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.13%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.13%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 2, 0.13%
Laos
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 2, 0.13%
Madagascar
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 2, 0.13%
Malawi
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.13%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.13%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.13%
UAE
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 2, 0.13%
Papua New Guinea
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.13%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.13%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.13%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.13%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.13%
|
French Polynesia
|
French Polynesia, 2, 0.13%
French Polynesia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.06%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.06%
Albania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.06%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.06%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.06%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.06%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.06%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Vanuatu
|
Vanuatu, 1, 0.06%
Vanuatu
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Vatican
|
Vatican, 1, 0.06%
Vatican
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Haiti
|
Haiti, 1, 0.06%
Haiti
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.06%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 1, 0.06%
Honduras
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.06%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 1, 0.06%
Cambodia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.06%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.06%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.06%
Malta
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Marshall Islands
|
Marshall Islands, 1, 0.06%
Marshall Islands
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.06%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.06%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.06%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.06%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
Germany
|
Germany, 189, 22.74%
Germany
189 publications, 22.74%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 141, 16.97%
Japan
141 publications, 16.97%
|
USA
|
USA, 140, 16.85%
USA
140 publications, 16.85%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 139, 16.73%
United Kingdom
139 publications, 16.73%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 90, 10.83%
Netherlands
90 publications, 10.83%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 82, 9.87%
Australia
82 publications, 9.87%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 74, 8.9%
Sweden
74 publications, 8.9%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 59, 7.1%
Canada
59 publications, 7.1%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 57, 6.86%
Spain
57 publications, 6.86%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 56, 6.74%
Austria
56 publications, 6.74%
|
France
|
France, 47, 5.66%
France
47 publications, 5.66%
|
China
|
China, 47, 5.66%
China
47 publications, 5.66%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 47, 5.66%
Switzerland
47 publications, 5.66%
|
India
|
India, 32, 3.85%
India
32 publications, 3.85%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 32, 3.85%
Finland
32 publications, 3.85%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 3.37%
Italy
28 publications, 3.37%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 23, 2.77%
New Zealand
23 publications, 2.77%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 23, 2.77%
Norway
23 publications, 2.77%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 22, 2.65%
South Africa
22 publications, 2.65%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 20, 2.41%
Portugal
20 publications, 2.41%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 16, 1.93%
Belgium
16 publications, 1.93%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 16, 1.93%
Brazil
16 publications, 1.93%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 16, 1.93%
Indonesia
16 publications, 1.93%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 14, 1.68%
Kenya
14 publications, 1.68%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 14, 1.68%
Chile
14 publications, 1.68%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 13, 1.56%
Czech Republic
13 publications, 1.56%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 12, 1.44%
Mexico
12 publications, 1.44%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 11, 1.32%
Argentina
11 publications, 1.32%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 10, 1.2%
Ghana
10 publications, 1.2%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 10, 1.2%
Denmark
10 publications, 1.2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 10, 1.2%
Colombia
10 publications, 1.2%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 8, 0.96%
Greece
8 publications, 0.96%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.84%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.84%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.84%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.84%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 0.84%
Thailand
7 publications, 0.84%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 7, 0.84%
Philippines
7 publications, 0.84%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 6, 0.72%
Bangladesh
6 publications, 0.72%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 6, 0.72%
Ireland
6 publications, 0.72%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 6, 0.72%
Peru
6 publications, 0.72%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 0.6%
Vietnam
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.6%
Egypt
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.6%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 5, 0.6%
Ecuador
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 5, 0.6%
Ethiopia
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.48%
Poland
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.48%
Romania
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 4, 0.48%
Fiji
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.36%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.36%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.36%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.24%
Russia
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.24%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.24%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 2, 0.24%
Israel
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.24%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 0.24%
Cameroon
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.24%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.24%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 2, 0.24%
Madagascar
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.24%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.24%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.24%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.24%
UAE
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 2, 0.24%
Papua New Guinea
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.24%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 2, 0.24%
Senegal
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.24%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.24%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.24%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.12%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.12%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.12%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.12%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Vanuatu
|
Vanuatu, 1, 0.12%
Vanuatu
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Vatican
|
Vatican, 1, 0.12%
Vatican
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Haiti
|
Haiti, 1, 0.12%
Haiti
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.12%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 1, 0.12%
Honduras
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.12%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.12%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.12%
Iran
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.12%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.12%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.12%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.12%
Laos
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.12%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.12%
Malta
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Marshall Islands
|
Marshall Islands, 1, 0.12%
Marshall Islands
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.12%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.12%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.12%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.12%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Niger
|
Niger, 1, 0.12%
Niger
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.12%
Panama
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.12%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Solomon Islands
|
Solomon Islands, 1, 0.12%
Solomon Islands
1 publication, 0.12%
|
French Polynesia
|
French Polynesia, 1, 0.12%
French Polynesia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.12%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Show all (66 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|