COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study
Public health recommendations and governmental measures during the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have enforced numerous restrictions on daily living including social distancing, isolation, and home confinement. While these measures are imperative to mitigate spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on psychosocial health is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey was launched in April 2020 to elucidate the behavioral and lifestyle consequences of COVID-19 restrictions. This report presents the preliminary results from more than one thousand responders on social participation and life satisfaction. Methods: Thirty-five research organizations from Europe, North-Africa, Western Asia, and the Americas promoted the survey through their networks to the general society, in 7 languages (English, German, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and Slovenian). Questions were presented in a differential format with questions related to responses “before” and “during” confinement conditions. Results: 1047 participations (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%), and others (3%) were included in the analysis. Findings revealed psychosocial strain during the enforced COVID-19 home confinement. Large decreases (p < 0.001) in the amount of social activity through family (−58%), friends/neighbors (−44.9%), or entertainment (−46.7%) were triggered by the enforced confinement. These negative effects on social participation were also associated with lower life satisfaction (−30.5%) during the confinement period. Conversely, the social contact score through digital technologies significantly increased (p < 0.001) during the confinement period with more individuals (+24.8%) being socially connected through digital technology. Conclusion: These preliminary findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the early COVID-19 home confinement period in 2020. Therefore, in order to mitigate the negative psychosocial effects of home confinement, implementation of national strategies focused on promoting social inclusion through a technology-based solution is strongly suggested.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
38 publications, 12.88%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
22 publications, 7.46%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
12 publications, 4.07%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
9 publications, 3.05%
|
|
|
Sustainability
8 publications, 2.71%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
5 publications, 1.69%
|
|
|
BMC Public Health
4 publications, 1.36%
|
|
|
Healthcare
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Current Psychology
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Hygiene
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Wellcome Open Research
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
F1000Research
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Work
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Journal of Health Psychology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Foods
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Nutrients
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Disabilities
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Sociology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
SN Social Sciences
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Quality of Life Research
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Trends in Psychology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
Journal of Happiness Studies
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
BMC psychology
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
MDPI
67 publications, 22.71%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
54 publications, 18.31%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
49 publications, 16.61%
|
|
|
Elsevier
25 publications, 8.47%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
19 publications, 6.44%
|
|
|
Wiley
16 publications, 5.42%
|
|
|
SAGE
10 publications, 3.39%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
9 publications, 3.05%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
4 publications, 1.36%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 publications, 1.36%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 publications, 1.36%
|
|
|
Emerald
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
BMJ
3 publications, 1.02%
|
|
|
SciELO
2 publications, 0.68%
|
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Asian Exercise and Sport Science Association
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Singapore Medical Association
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
Masaryk University Press
1 publication, 0.34%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.