Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
3.1
SJR
0.621
CiteScore
7.1
Categories
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Biomedical Engineering
Biotechnology
Bioengineering
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Chemical Engineering
Engineering
Immunology and Microbiology
Years of issue
2011-2025
journal names
Health and Technology
HEALTH TECHNOL-GER
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

University of Ghana
(19 publications)

Vellore Institute of Technology University
(17 publications)

University of Warwick
(16 publications)

University of Ghana
(19 publications)

University of Warwick
(15 publications)

Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
(11 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 287
Q1

Exploring Conditions for Designing Citizen Observatories in Sri Lanka: The Case of Air Quality in Rural Areas
Rathnayake C., Joshi S., Cerratto-Pargman T.
Q1
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q1

Does Terminology Matter? Effects of the Citizen Science Label on Participation in a Wildlife Conservation Online Platform
McLeod P., Schuldt J., Song H., Crain R., Dickinson J.
Despite concerns that sociocultural connotations of the term citizen science may discourage engagement with such projects among certain groups, little empirical evidence is available about the behavioral effects of this terminology. One specific area of concern is the persistent gender gap in citizen science participation. A two-week field experiment (N = 699) with users of an online platform framed as either a citizen science or an environmental stewardship project examined framing and gender effects on engagement, sense of community (SoC), and indicators of pro-environmental interest. Results revealed no direct effects of the frame. Rather, framing interacted with participants’ perceptions of the extent to which the project was about citizen science or environmental stewardship. Perceiving the project as environmental stewardship predicted higher engagement and environmental interest among women than among men, and greater SoC only among men assigned to the environmental stewardship frame. A key implication is that the congruence between a project’s label and people’s experiences in the project may be more important than how the project is labeled.
Q1

Fishing on Facebook: Using Social Media and Citizen Science to Crowd-Source Trophy Murray Cod
O’Connell M., Spennemann D., Bond J., Kopf R.K., McCasker N., Humphries P.
Shifting baselines, whereby people’s perceptions of what was the “natural” state of the environment changes with each generation, hinders conservation, restoration, and management. Formal and informal historical animal records can be used to inform past biological, ecological, and environmental patterns and processes. Trophy specimens are cultural and social objects but also are examples of informal historical records that may supply biological tissue and supplement formal natural history collections. The use of social media to gather information from citizen scientists has great potential for data collection of such specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential utility of Facebook and traditional media to collect data on taxidermal Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii), a large, long-lived freshwater fish endemic to the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. A Facebook group, “Cod Spot,” was established as the location for information dissemination to potential citizen scientists, and where data on Murray cod mounts could be uploaded. This was complemented with social and mainstream media promotion, a research website, and an e-survey. Cod Spot received >7,000 interactions and approximately 400 participants. A total of 189 verified locations of Murray cod head and whole mounts were found. The e-survey provided verification of the potential to turn these cultural and social objects into ones with scientific value. Participants included interested persons, collectors, taxidermists, stewards, or owners of mounts. Most participants were males aged 35+, although women comprised almost a third of website users. This research has shown that low-cost marketing, combined with a widely dispersed, relatively common and well-known object of interest, can be effective at gaining participation in citizen science collaborations.
Q1

Creative-Motivated Citizen Science After-School STEAM Programme for Motivating Actions Related to the Oceanic Microplastics Problem
Sayuda T., Kinoshita H., Kato F., Pennington M.
Citizen science (CS) projects focused on microplastics (MP), small plastics that cause widespread ocean pollution, have gained interest from international research communities. However, research is lacking on designing citizen science educational programmes that promote microplastic problem-solving and enhance local understanding. These programmes could use STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math) education and creative activities for children, supported by local adults such as parents and teachers. We, therefore, created a nine-week STEAM education CS after-school programme for primary school children. In addition to MP sampling, we have also incorporated elements of STEAM education, combining creative projects and motivational activities, in this creative-motivated after-school programme. Our goals are to encourage long-term community cooperation in research, learning about MP issues, and thinking about local solutions through this community participatory CS programme. As a result, our qualitative results showed that five primary school children and five community adults were actively involved in the programme. Three creative project outputs were produced, and four MP data sampling sessions were conducted. Three pairs of children and their mother participants remained engaged in this ongoing problem-solving activity 10 months after its conclusion. During our programme progression, we observed familial engagement between local children and parents, which has not commonly been studied in the context of CS programmes. We believe that designing action-motivating long-term programmes to raise participants’ awareness of issues and interest in research is important. This CS programme has the potential to encourage long-term community interaction with research and enhance community involvement in environmental issues.
Q1

The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Community Science Approach to Explore Infant Formula Preparation Safety in the Home
Jones S., Cooper J., Dolling A., McNamara T., Dvorak S., Sibson V., Brown A., Yhnell E., Buchanan P., Breward S., Ellis R., Grant A.
Q1
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q1

FreshWater Watch: Investigating the Health of Freshwater Ecosystems, from the Bottom Up
Bishop I., Boldrini A., Clymans W., Hall C., Moorhouse H., Parkinson S., Scott-Somme K., Thornhill I., Loiselle S.
Freshwater ecosystems are increasingly facing major global and local stressors, while monitoring surface water status by regulatory agencies is often limited by financial and political constraints. Citizen science–based approaches with robust quality control and training can support regulatory monitoring and decision-making. Herein, we outline the criteria used to develop a citizen science monitoring program for water quality, based on a standardized methodology designed to support the Agenda 2030 indicator 6.3.2 and the EU’s Water Framework Directive. We explore the evolution of protocols used to ensure data robustness and transferability and examine the utility of contextual information registered by citizen scientists. We present laboratory and field experiments conducted to validate chemical and optical methods. Using the data from more than 80 projects across 4 biogeographical regions, we explore consistencies and differences in seasonal and spatial trends in macronutrient concentrations between regions. Our results indicate that nitrate and phosphate concentrations tend to increase in areas with agricultural intensification and industrial land use. Seasonally, nitrate concentrations reach a maximum in spring and autumn in temperate regions, while phosphate levels are highest in summer and autumn, reaching a minimum in winter. We also found that observations of algal blooms coincided with periods of lower nitrate concentrations. Importantly, data of ecological, chemical, and optical conditions recorded by citizen scientists are being used by local and regional stakeholders in managing freshwater ecosystems. This study reveals the potential for scaling citizen science–based monitoring programs to contribute towards a global assessment of water quality.
Q1

An Emerging Theory of School-Based Participatory Science
Smith P.S., Goforth C.L., Carrier S.J., Hayes M.L., Safley S.E.
Q1
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
Q1

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Citizen Science
Fortson L., Crowston K., Kloetzer L., Ponti M.
N/A
Q1

Understanding Confusion: A Case Study of Training a Machine Model to Predict and Interpret Consensus From Volunteer Labels
Sankar R., Mantha K., Nesmith C., Fortson L., Brueshaber S., Hansen-Koharcheck C., Orton G.
Citizen science has become a valuable and reliable method for interpreting and processing big datasets, and is vital in the era of ever-growing data volumes. However, there are inherent difficulties in the generating labels from citizen scientists, due to the inherent variability between the members of the crowd, leading to variability in the results. Sometimes, this is useful — such as with serendipitous discoveries, which corresponds to rare/unknown classes in the data — but it might also be due to ambiguity between classes. The primary issue is then to distinguish between the intrinsic variability in the dataset and the uncertainty in the citizen scientists’ responses, and leveraging that to extract scientifically useful relationships. In this paper, we explore using a neural network to interpret volunteer confusion across the dataset, to increase the purity of the downstream analysis. We focus on the use of learned features from the network to disentangle feature similarity across the classes, and the ability of the machines’ “attention” in identifying features that lead to confusion. We use data from Jovian Vortex Hunter, a citizen science project to study vortices in Jupiter’s atmosphere, and find that the latent space from the model helps effectively identify different sources of image-level features that lead to low volunteer consensus. Furthermore, the machine’s attention highlights features corresponding to specific classes. This provides meaningful image-level feature-class relationships, which is useful in our analysis for identifying vortex-specific features to better understand vortex evolution mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the applicability of this method to other citizen science projects.
Q1

From Voxels to Viruses: Using Deep Learning and Crowdsourcing to Understand a Virus Factory
Pennington A., King O.N., Tun W.M., Boyce M., Sutton G., Stuart D.I., Basham M., Darrow M.C.
Many bioimaging research projects require objects of interest to be identified, located, and then traced to allow quantitative measurement. Depending on the complexity of the system and imaging, instance segmentation is often done manually, and automated approaches still require weeks to months of an individual’s time to acquire the necessary training data for AI models. As such, there is a strong need to develop approaches for instance segmentation that minimize the use of expert annotation while maintaining quality on challenging image analysis problems.
Herein, we present our work on a citizen science project we ran called Science Scribbler: Virus Factory on the Zooniverse platform, in which citizen scientists annotated a cryo-electron tomography volume by locating and categorising viruses using point-based annotations instead of manually drawing outlines. One crowdsourcing workflow produced a database of virus locations, and the other workflow produced a set of classifications of those locations. Together, this allowed mask annotation to be generated for training a deep learning–based segmentation model. From this model, segmentations were produced that allowed for measurements such as counts of the viruses by virus class.
The application of citizen science–driven crowdsourcing to the generation of instance segmentations of volumetric bioimages is a step towards developing annotation-efficient segmentation workflows for bioimaging data. This approach aligns with the growing interest in citizen science initiatives that combine the collective intelligence of volunteers with AI to tackle complex problems while involving the public with research that is being undertaken in these important areas of science.
Q1

Through the Citizen Scientists’ Eyes: Insights into Using Citizen Science with Machine Learning for Effective Identification of Unknown-Unknowns in Big Data
Mantha K.B., Roberts H., Fortson L., Lintott C., Dickinson H., Keel W., Sankar R., Krawczyk C., Simmons B., Walmsley M., Garland I., Makechemu J.S., Trouille L., Johnson C.
In the era of rapidly growing astronomical data, the gap between data collection and analysis is a significant barrier, especially for teams searching for rare scientific objects. Although machine learning (ML) can quickly parse large data sets, it struggles to robustly identify scientifically interesting objects, a task at which humans excel. Human-in-the-loop (HITL) strategies that combine the strengths of citizen science (CS) and ML offer a promising solution, but first, we need to better understand the relationship between human- and machine-identified samples. In this work, we present a case study from the Galaxy Zoo: Weird & Wonderful project, where volunteers inspected ~200,000 astronomical images—processed by an ML-based anomaly detection model—to identify those with unusual or interesting characteristics. Volunteer-selected images with common astrophysical characteristics had higher consensus, while rarer or more complex ones had lower consensus. This suggests low-consensus choices shouldn’t be dismissed in further explorations. Additionally, volunteers were better at filtering out uninteresting anomalies, such as image artifacts, which the machine struggled with. We also found that a higher ML-generated anomaly score that indicates images’ low-level feature anomalousness was a better predictor of the volunteers’ consensus choice. Combining a locus of high volunteer-consensus images within the ML learnt feature space and anomaly score, we demonstrated a decision boundary that can effectively isolate images with unusual and potentially scientifically interesting characteristics. Using this case study, we lay important guidelines for future research studies looking to adapt and operationalize human-machine collaborative frameworks for efficient anomaly detection in big data.
Q1

Supporting Human and Machine Co-Learning in Citizen Science: Lessons From Gravity Spy
Østerlund C., Crowston K., Jackson C.B., Wu Y., Smith A.O., Katsaggelos A.K.
We explore the bi-directional relationship between human and machine learning in citizen science. Theoretically, the study draws on the zone of proximal development (ZPD) concept, which allows us to describe AI augmentation of human learning, human augmentation of machine learning, and how tasks can be designed to facilitate co-learning. The study takes a design-science approach to explore the design, deployment, and evaluations of the Gravity Spy citizen science project. The findings highlight the challenges and opportunities of co-learning, where both humans and machines contribute to each other’s learning and capabilities. The study takes its point of departure in the literature on co-learning and develops a framework for designing projects where humans and machines mutually enhance each other’s learning. The research contributes to the existing literature by developing a dynamic approach to human-AI augmentation, by emphasizing that the ZPD supports ongoing learning for volunteers and keeps machine learning aligned with evolving data. The approach offers potential benefits for project scalability, participant engagement, and automation considerations while acknowledging the importance of tutorials, community access, and expert involvement in supporting learning.
Q1

Does Using Artificial Intelligence in Citizen Science Support Volunteers’ Learning? An Experimental Study in Ornithology
Pankiv K., Kloetzer L.
One of the oldest and largest biodiversity-related citizen science (CS) projects is eBird (https://ebird.org/home), developed by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. It provides a mobile application for birdwatchers to record checklists of when, where, and how they have seen or heard birds. The Cornell Lab has also developed a mobile application, Merlin, which uses a deep convolutional neural network to help users automatically identify bird species from photos, sounds (converted to spectrograms), or descriptions. This research investigates how the use of machine learning (ML) classification models affects the learning of novice birders. Our participants (computer science students with no previous background in ornithology) were randomly divided into three groups: one using the eBird application and identifying bird species themselves; one using the Merlin application, which uses ML to automatically identify birds from photos or sounds; and a control group. Participants were tested on their knowledge of birds before and after participating in the project to see how using the ML classification model affected their learning. We also interviewed selected participants after the post-test to understand what they had done and what might explain the results. Our results show that novice participants who participate in a CS project for even a short time significantly improve their content knowledge of familiar birds in their neighbourhood, and that eBird users outperform Merlin users on the knowledge post-test. Although AI may improve volunteer productivity and retention, there is a risk that it may reduce their learning. Further research with different participant profiles and project designs is needed to understand how to optimise volunteer productivity, retention, and learning in AI-assisted CS projects.
Q1

The Dual Nature of Trust in Participatory Sciences: An Investigation into Data Quality and Household Privacy Preferences
Lin Hunter D., Johnson V., Cooper C.
There is a duality of trust in participatory science (citizen science) projects in which the data produced by volunteers must be trusted by the scientific community and participants must trust the scientists who lead projects. Facilitator organizations are third-party organizations that engage their members in participatory science to enrich their members’ experience at their organization. In Crowd the Tap, we engaged participants through facilitator organizations including high schools, faith communities, universities, and a corporate volunteer program. We used Kruskal Wallis tests and chi-square tests with Bonferroni post hoc tests to assess how data quality and privacy preferences differed across facilitator groups and amongst those who participated in the project independently (unfacilitated). Faith communities provided higher data quality while students provided lower data quality. Data quality in education settings differed based on the level of investment of the project in terms of both time and money as well as student age. We also found that demographic and household characteristics seemed more important in predicting privacy preferences than facilitation. Our results suggest that project leaders can support diverse participation by extending protection of participant privacy and investing in needed resources to support facilitators. They also suggest that education-oriented facilitators may need to prioritize data quality to ensure authentic learning opportunities. Ultimately our results reveal several tradeoffs that project leaders can weigh when deciding to work with facilitators.
Q1

Citizen Science for Nature Conservation in Hungary A Three-Dimensional Approach
Soria Aguirre J.M., Váczi O., Biró M., Juhász E., Soltész Z., Barta B., Márton Z., Szép T., Halpern B., Szentirmai I., Károlyi B., Czeglédi A., Bela G., Tormáné Kovács E.
Nature conservation–related citizen science (NCCS) has grown rapidly worldwide in previous years. In Hungary, a few citizen science (CS) projects have been operating for years and some have only recently launched. Our aim herein is to assess the performance of eight Hungarian NCCS projects in three dimensions: a) science, b) nature conservation, and c) participants’ development. An evaluation framework was developed for the assessment. Our results show that the Common Bird Monitoring Program performed the best overall. This is also the oldest NCCS project in the country. When comparing the performance per dimension, the majority of the projects tended to have good performances in the science dimension. Most of the projects ensure data quality using different strategies. However, the need for open data and processing the project results for generating scientific publications still needs to be tackled by some NCCS initiatives. Regarding the nature conservation dimension, data generated have been mostly used in monitoring species/ecosystems, whereas data is less commonly used for conservation policy-making. It was identified that the participants’ development dimension has not received sufficient attention, and neither learning outcomes nor behavioral and attitude change has been evaluated by any projects. Our results of evaluating Hungarian NCCS initiatives in a complex way may offer insights for project managers and coordinators to identify which dimension are performing well and which areas need improvement. Also, our framework serves as a model that can be applied to current and future NCCS initiatives.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Health and Technology
321 citations, 3.72%
|
|
IEEE Access
162 citations, 1.88%
|
|
Sensors
115 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
101 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
98 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
88 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
80 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
61 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Healthcare
57 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
52 citations, 0.6%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
51 citations, 0.59%
|
|
IFMBE Proceedings
51 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
51 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
51 citations, 0.59%
|
|
PLoS ONE
51 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Digital Health
50 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
42 citations, 0.49%
|
|
International Journal of Medical Informatics
41 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
41 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Technology and Health Care
40 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Diagnostics
40 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Heliyon
40 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
36 citations, 0.42%
|
|
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
35 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
35 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Irreversible Electroporation
35 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Scientific Reports
34 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Advances in Healthcare Information Systems and Administration
34 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Medical Systems
33 citations, 0.38%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
33 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Medical Advancements in Aging and Regenerative Technologies
32 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
31 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
29 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
26 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Cureus
26 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
25 citations, 0.29%
|
|
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
24 citations, 0.28%
|
|
BMJ Open
24 citations, 0.28%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
24 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
23 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making
22 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sustainability
22 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
21 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
21 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Mathematics
19 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
18 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
18 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
18 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Bioengineering
18 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Health Informatics Journal
17 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Wireless Personal Communications
17 citations, 0.2%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
17 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
16 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
16 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
16 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
16 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Review
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
JMIR Medical Informatics
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Information (Switzerland)
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Digital Health
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
13 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Soft Computing
13 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Technology in Society
13 citations, 0.15%
|
|
npj Digital Medicine
13 citations, 0.15%
|
|
SN Computer Science
13 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Expert Systems
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Information Technology
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
JMIR Human Factors
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Future Internet
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Medical Ethics
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Intelligence
11 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Knowledge-Based Systems
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Internet of Things
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMC Public Health
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cluster Computing
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Applied Clinical Informatics
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Healthcare Analytics
10 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Brain Sciences
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Health Policy and Technology
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Radiography
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Springer Nature
2044 citations, 23.69%
|
|
Elsevier
1353 citations, 15.68%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
914 citations, 10.59%
|
|
MDPI
777 citations, 9.01%
|
|
JMIR Publications
348 citations, 4.03%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
302 citations, 3.5%
|
|
Wiley
262 citations, 3.04%
|
|
SAGE
211 citations, 2.45%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
211 citations, 2.45%
|
|
IGI Global
195 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Emerald
115 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
91 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
90 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
81 citations, 0.94%
|
|
IOS Press
77 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
66 citations, 0.76%
|
|
BMJ
56 citations, 0.65%
|
|
IOP Publishing
53 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Oxford University Press
52 citations, 0.6%
|
|
World Scientific
42 citations, 0.49%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
40 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
37 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
33 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
33 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
33 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
29 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
27 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
26 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
23 citations, 0.27%
|
|
AIP Publishing
19 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IntechOpen
18 citations, 0.21%
|
|
EDP Sciences
17 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
17 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
15 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Medknow
14 citations, 0.16%
|
|
PeerJ
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SciELO
12 citations, 0.14%
|
|
King Saud University
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
S. Karger AG
9 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Tech Science Press
7 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
6 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Medical Informatics Association
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AOSIS
5 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
ASME International
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
4 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Human Kinetics
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physiological Society
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oncology Nursing Society
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tongji University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Montreal
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIIRAS
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
A and V Publications
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CAIRN
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Women Health Nursing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bristol University Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics - UMTE
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
University of Ghana
19 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
17 publications, 1.83%
|
|
University of Warwick
16 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
National Defense University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Florence
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Sarajevo
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
King's College London
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Ulster
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Oxford
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Sydney
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Favaloro University
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Twente
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Sultan Idris University of Education
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
National Technological University
7 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Coimbra
6 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cyprus
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Milan
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Beirut Arab University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Campus Bio-Medico University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of South Australia
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Covenant University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Iranian Research Organization for Science & Technology
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Kashmir
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Malaya
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Linköping University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Helsinki
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
European Organization for Nuclear Research
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
International Atomic Energy Agency
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Pavia
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Siena
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of South Africa
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Duke University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Ioannina
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Musashino University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
International Burch University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Sharjah
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Patna
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Raipur
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Central Leather Research Institute
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology & Research
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University Hospital Heidelberg
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Tampere University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
INTI International University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Oulu
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Medical University of Graz
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Cambridge
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Yale University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Chaoyang University of Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Pisa
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Adelaide
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Tygerberg Hospital
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
University of Ghana
19 publications, 3.53%
|
|
University of Warwick
15 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
11 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
10 publications, 1.86%
|
|
University of Oxford
8 publications, 1.48%
|
|
King's College London
7 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital
7 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
6 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
6 publications, 1.11%
|
|
University of Florence
6 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Campus Bio-Medico University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Covenant University
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Cape Coast
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Coimbra
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Kashmir
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
European Organization for Nuclear Research
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Milan
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
International Atomic Energy Agency
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Pavia
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Siena
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Musashino University
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Sharjah
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Siksha 'O' Anusandhan
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Patna
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Central Leather Research Institute
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Twente
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Malaya
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University Hospital Heidelberg
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Linköping University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Sultan Idris University of Education
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
INTI International University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Pisa
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
National Institute for Nuclear Physics
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of South Australia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of South Africa
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tygerberg Hospital
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Mahidol University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Crete
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Swansea University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Porto
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Sarajevo
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Gazi University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Raipur
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Information Technology and Communications
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Al-Nahrain University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tikrit University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Fudan University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Amity University, Noida
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology & Research
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Taylor's University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Helsinki University Hospital
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Oulu
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Aalborg University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Beirut Arab University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Padua
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Cairo University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Marche Polytechnic University
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
USA
|
USA, 147, 15.84%
USA
147 publications, 15.84%
|
India
|
India, 134, 14.44%
India
134 publications, 14.44%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 106, 11.42%
United Kingdom
106 publications, 11.42%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 69, 7.44%
Italy
69 publications, 7.44%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 40, 4.31%
Germany
40 publications, 4.31%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 40, 4.31%
Australia
40 publications, 4.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 30, 3.23%
Iran
30 publications, 3.23%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 30, 3.23%
Malaysia
30 publications, 3.23%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 29, 3.13%
Greece
29 publications, 3.13%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 27, 2.91%
Brazil
27 publications, 2.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 27, 2.91%
Canada
27 publications, 2.91%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 26, 2.8%
Netherlands
26 publications, 2.8%
|
China
|
China, 24, 2.59%
China
24 publications, 2.59%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 24, 2.59%
Ghana
24 publications, 2.59%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 23, 2.48%
Mexico
23 publications, 2.48%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 21, 2.26%
Portugal
21 publications, 2.26%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 21, 2.26%
Spain
21 publications, 2.26%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 21, 2.26%
Japan
21 publications, 2.26%
|
France
|
France, 20, 2.16%
France
20 publications, 2.16%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 18, 1.94%
Saudi Arabia
18 publications, 1.94%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 15, 1.62%
Nigeria
15 publications, 1.62%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 15, 1.62%
Turkey
15 publications, 1.62%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 15, 1.62%
Finland
15 publications, 1.62%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 15, 1.62%
Sweden
15 publications, 1.62%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 14, 1.51%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
14 publications, 1.51%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 13, 1.4%
Austria
13 publications, 1.4%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 1.4%
Belgium
13 publications, 1.4%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 13, 1.4%
Norway
13 publications, 1.4%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 13, 1.4%
South Africa
13 publications, 1.4%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 12, 1.29%
Switzerland
12 publications, 1.29%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 11, 1.19%
Argentina
11 publications, 1.19%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 11, 1.19%
Bulgaria
11 publications, 1.19%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 9, 0.97%
Cameroon
9 publications, 0.97%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 9, 0.97%
Colombia
9 publications, 0.97%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 9, 0.97%
New Zealand
9 publications, 0.97%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 9, 0.97%
Singapore
9 publications, 0.97%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 9, 0.97%
Czech Republic
9 publications, 0.97%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 8, 0.86%
Iraq
8 publications, 0.86%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 7, 0.75%
Bangladesh
7 publications, 0.75%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 7, 0.75%
Jordan
7 publications, 0.75%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 7, 0.75%
Lebanon
7 publications, 0.75%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 7, 0.75%
Morocco
7 publications, 0.75%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 0.75%
Pakistan
7 publications, 0.75%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 6, 0.65%
Egypt
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.65%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.65%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.65%
UAE
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 6, 0.65%
Republic of Korea
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 5, 0.54%
Denmark
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 5, 0.54%
Israel
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.54%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 4, 0.43%
Benin
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.43%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 4, 0.43%
Cuba
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.43%
Oman
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 4, 0.43%
Poland
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.43%
Romania
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.43%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0.43%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 3, 0.32%
Algeria
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.32%
Venezuela
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.32%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.32%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.32%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 3, 0.32%
Rwanda
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.32%
Chile
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.22%
Russia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.22%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Burundi
|
Burundi, 2, 0.22%
Burundi
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.22%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.22%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 2, 0.22%
Mauritius
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.22%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.22%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 2, 0.22%
Sudan
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.22%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.22%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.22%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.11%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.11%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.11%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.11%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.11%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Congo-Brazzaville
|
Congo-Brazzaville, 1, 0.11%
Congo-Brazzaville
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.11%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.11%
Malta
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.11%
Peru
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.11%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.11%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.11%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 1, 0.11%
Somalia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Suriname
|
Suriname, 1, 0.11%
Suriname
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.11%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.11%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.11%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Show all (63 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
India
|
India, 81, 15.03%
India
81 publications, 15.03%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 71, 13.17%
United Kingdom
71 publications, 13.17%
|
USA
|
USA, 60, 11.13%
USA
60 publications, 11.13%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 53, 9.83%
Italy
53 publications, 9.83%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 24, 4.45%
Ghana
24 publications, 4.45%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 23, 4.27%
Germany
23 publications, 4.27%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 20, 3.71%
Brazil
20 publications, 3.71%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 20, 3.71%
Malaysia
20 publications, 3.71%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 17, 3.15%
Australia
17 publications, 3.15%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 17, 3.15%
Canada
17 publications, 3.15%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 16, 2.97%
Saudi Arabia
16 publications, 2.97%
|
China
|
China, 15, 2.78%
China
15 publications, 2.78%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 14, 2.6%
Nigeria
14 publications, 2.6%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 14, 2.6%
Japan
14 publications, 2.6%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 13, 2.41%
Iran
13 publications, 2.41%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 12, 2.23%
Portugal
12 publications, 2.23%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 12, 2.23%
Greece
12 publications, 2.23%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 11, 2.04%
Spain
11 publications, 2.04%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 11, 2.04%
Norway
11 publications, 2.04%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 10, 1.86%
Finland
10 publications, 1.86%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 1.86%
South Africa
10 publications, 1.86%
|
France
|
France, 9, 1.67%
France
9 publications, 1.67%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 9, 1.67%
Netherlands
9 publications, 1.67%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 1.67%
Turkey
9 publications, 1.67%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 1.48%
Austria
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 1.48%
Belgium
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 8, 1.48%
Bulgaria
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 1.48%
Switzerland
8 publications, 1.48%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 7, 1.3%
Cameroon
7 publications, 1.3%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 7, 1.3%
Morocco
7 publications, 1.3%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 6, 1.11%
Iraq
6 publications, 1.11%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 1.11%
Mexico
6 publications, 1.11%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 1.11%
UAE
6 publications, 1.11%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 6, 1.11%
Sweden
6 publications, 1.11%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.93%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 0.93%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 0.93%
Colombia
5 publications, 0.93%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.93%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.93%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 4, 0.74%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.74%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 4, 0.74%
Jordan
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 4, 0.74%
Cuba
4 publications, 0.74%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.74%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 4, 0.74%
Pakistan
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.74%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 0.74%
Czech Republic
4 publications, 0.74%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 3, 0.56%
Algeria
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 3, 0.56%
Benin
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.56%
Venezuela
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.56%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.56%
Israel
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.56%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.56%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.56%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 3, 0.56%
Oman
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.56%
Poland
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.56%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.56%
Romania
3 publications, 0.56%
|
Burundi
|
Burundi, 2, 0.37%
Burundi
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.37%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.37%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 2, 0.37%
Mauritius
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.37%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.37%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 2, 0.37%
Sudan
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.37%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.37%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.19%
Russia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.19%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.19%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.19%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.19%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.19%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.19%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.19%
Malta
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 1, 0.19%
Somalia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.19%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.19%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.19%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.19%
Chile
1 publication, 0.19%
|
Show all (48 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
3 profile journal articles
Takefuji Yoshiyasu
154 publications,
254 citations
h-index: 8