Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.3
SJR
0.345
CiteScore
2.2
Categories
Economics and Econometrics
Areas
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Years of issue
1977, 1982, 1996-2025
journal names
Eastern European Economics
EASTERN EUR ECON
Top-3 citing journals

Eastern European Economics
(304 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(296 citations)

Post-Communist Economies
(130 citations)
Top-3 organizations

SGH Warsaw School of Economics
(24 publications)

Tallinn University of Technology
(20 publications)

University of Ljubljana
(20 publications)

Charles University
(7 publications)

University of Belgrade
(7 publications)

Kozminski University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1847
Q1

Prediction of airport surface potential conflict based on GNN‐LSTM
Yuan L., Fang D., Chen H., Liu J.
AbstractThe development of the civil aviation industry has contributed to a steady increase in the number of daily flight operations at airports, which in turn has led to increasingly complex airport ground layouts. To aid airport managers in understanding the operational situation on the airport surface, this paper introduces a predictive model for airport ground conflict situations based on GNN‐LSTM. This model identifies potential conflicts, conflict hotspots, and conflict hotspots zones, designating key intersections on taxiways as conflict hotspots according to taxiing rules. A conflict network is constructed, employing GNN with an integrated attention mechanism to extract structural features of the network, while LSTM is utilized to capture temporal features. After tuning the model parameters, predictions are made regarding the overall potential number of potential conflicts on the surface. To validate the effectiveness of the model, experimental analysis is conducted using AirTOp simulation data from Shenzhen Bao'an Airport, comparing GNN‐LSTM model with GNN‐GRU, LSTM, and GRU models, using RMSE and MAE as loss functions. The results demonstrate that he proposed modelling approach effectively extracts the temporal features of potential conflict and GNN‐LSTM model outperforms other models in predicting the overall number of potential conflicts.
Q1

Boarding stop inference with uncertain relationship between bus vehicles and mobile smart card readers
Zhou P., Shen Y., Ji Y., Du Y.
AbstractBoarding stop inference for bus passengers is essential for the improvement of bus transit services. Previous studies mainly focus on matching the bus trajectories with the bus stop locations, while the relationship between smart card readers—which collect the smart card data—and bus vehicles is usually given. However, uncertainties arise in practical applications regarding the matching of vehicles and card readers. To tackle this challenge, in this study, a data‐driven approach is proposed to dig into the spatiotemporal features of passengers' smart card data and bus vehicle operations. A weighted bipartite graph algorithm is developed to match the smart card readers with the bus vehicles automatically. To verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a case study is conducted on the Bus Anhong Line in Shanghai, China. The inferred results of boarding stops are compared with the data from passenger counting sensors installed in the bus vehicles. The matching accuracy rate achieves 0.9539, which validates the effectiveness of the proposed matching model. In addition, the inferred data are used to present the spatiotemporal patterns of boarding passengers and identify high‐demand bus stops.
Q1

Design prognostics for 4400 TEU container vessel by multi‐variate Gaidai reliability approach
Zhu Y., Gaidai O., Sheng J., Ashraf A., Cao Y., Liu Z.
AbstractThis case study introduces an innovative multivariate methodology for assessing the lifetime of marine engineering systems, specifically in cargo vessel transportation. The analysis focused on stress data collected onboard a 4400 TEU container vessel during multiple trans‐Atlantic voyages. One of the major challenges in marine cargo transport lies in mitigating the risk of container loss due to excessive whipping loads. Accurate prediction of extreme stress levels on vessel deck panels remains difficult, primarily because of the nonlinear and non‐stationary nature of wave and ship motion interactions. Higher‐order dynamic effects, such as second‐ and third‐order responses, often become significant when ships operate under adverse environmental conditions, amplifying nonlinear influences. Laboratory simulations, constrained by wave characteristics and scale similarity issues, may not always provide reliable results. Consequently, data collected from vessels navigating extreme weather conditions serves as a critical resource for comprehensive container ship risk assessment. The primary goal of this study was to validate and demonstrate the effectiveness of a novel multivariate risk evaluation approach, leveraging onboard measurements of dynamic areal pressure on cargo ship deck panels as the core dataset. The Gaidai methodology for multivariate risk evaluation proved to be a robust tool for assessing failure, hazard, and damage risks in complex, nonlinear vessel deck panel and ship hull stress systems.
Q1

A reinforcement learning‐based reverse‐parking system for autonomous vehicles
Al‐Mousa A., Arrabi A., Daoud H.
AbstractThis work presents the design and implementation of a reinforcement learning‐based autonomous parking system where an agent is trained to reverse‐park in a selected parking spot. The parking procedure is divided into three stages, and each stage has its corresponding surrogate objective that contributes to the overall parking process. The model solely depends on features extracted from a top‐view image of the parking space. It has the advantage of potential deployment in smart parking buildings without refitting non‐autonomous cars with modern sensors. The training was conducted offline on a simulation utilizing the proximal policy optimization algorithm. The model was then transferred and tested on a hardware prototype of the parking space. The results of the system were successful as the successful parking rate reached 100% with no collisions with any objects, and the fastest parking time reached 10 s. The testing was conducted on multiple samples and scenarios of the parking setup.
Q1

Edge‐computing‐based operations for automated vehicles with different cooperation classes at stop‐controlled intersections
Soleimaniamiri S., Yao H., Ghiasi A., Li X., Bujanović P., Vadakpat G., Lochrane T.W.
AbstractCooperation classes have been defined by SAE International to differentiate the communication capabilities between vehicles and infrastructure. To advance understanding of the impact of cooperation classes on autonomous cooperative driving and optimize traffic operations, this article proposes an edge‐computing‐based operations framework for cooperative‐automated driving system (C‐ADS)‐equipped vehicles at a stop‐controlled intersection. First, a critical time points estimation component estimates a set of critical time points for each C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle. Second, a trajectory‐smoothing component is called at each C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle in a decentralized manner to control C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle trajectories based on the estimated critical time points and its cooperation behavior. Notably, this study represents a first‐time investigation of different cooperation classes for stop‐controlled intersections. Simulation results show that the proposed framework can reduce stop‐and‐go traffic, yielding significant improvements in mobility and energy efficiency, as the cooperation class increases. Results also demonstrate that the proposed framework is suitable for real‐time applications by distributing computational burden in different entities. Further, results verify that the proposed framework can handle varying speed errors without significant loss in performance.
Q1

Formulation and solution framework for real‐time railway traffic management with demand prediction
Pascariu B., Flensburg J.V., Pellegrini P., Azevedo C.M.
AbstractRecent transport policies increasingly promote shifts towards rail travel aiming at a more sustainable transportation system. This shift is hampered by widespread unexpected perturbations in operations, resulting in perceived poor punctuality and reliability. When prevention of such perturbations is not feasible, traffic management must mitigate their effects, resolving arising conflicts to restore regular train operations and minimize delay. Current practice generally includes the assessment of railway performance in terms of train delays, but the quality of service to passengers is rarely explicitly accounted for. A railway traffic management framework is proposed that accounts for both passenger and train delays. To do so, a predictive optimization framework is proposed, integrating a demand prediction module, a passenger demand assignment module and a traffic management module. The first dynamically predicts future origin‐destination passenger flows using linear regression on real‐time observed smart card data. Then, the demand assignment module links predicted passengers to specific train paths, given a railway schedule. Finally, the traffic management module optimizes train scheduling and routing in real time, under the combined objective of minimizing train and passenger delays. The methodology is validated and benchmarked against equivalent passenger agnostic traffic management on a case study of the Copenhagen suburban railway network. The results show that it is possible to take into account passenger perspective in railway traffic management, without reducing the railway system efficiency compared to classic approaches.
Q1

Hybrid spatial and channel attention in post‐accident object detection
Kim J., Lee S.
AbstractAnalysing post‐accident scenes using in‐vehicle cameras is crucial for effective highway traffic control and enhancing accident response, road safety, and traffic flow. This contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the situation and achieves better decision‐making and effective management. The accident scene report system is designed to focus on specific post‐accident objects, such as crashed vehicles, involved individuals, emergency vehicles, and debris. This means that the post‐accident object detection algorithm needs to handle a wide variety of objects, from large collapsed vehicles to tiny particles. It should operate in real‐time on embedded boards, balancing detection accuracy and compactness to fit within the constraints of embedded computing modules. This approach aims to facilitate prompt reporting to traffic control centres. In this study, a hybrid spatial and channel attention and its pruning algorithm tailored for object detection in post‐accident scenarios are proposed. This approach markedly enhances the detection performance in the unexpected accidents and malfunctioning scenes, significantly boosting the system's accuracy and processing speed. The method optimally balances the model compactness with seamless attention and pruning, making it highly suitable for real‐time applications in traffic monitoring systems. The proposed seamless attention and pruning method is demonstrated using the proposed accident object detection dataset.
Q1

Lane‐changing control strategy for distributed drive vehicles considering yaw stability
Hu J., Liu H., Yi S., Huang C.
AbstractIntelligent vehicles are prone to dangerous issues such as sideslip and instability when changing lanes to avoid obstacles under some extreme conditions. Therefore, to improve safety and stability during the obstacle‐avoidance process, this paper proposes a lane‐change control method that considers yaw stability based on distributed drive electric vehicles. Fuzzy adaptive model predictive control and proportional integral derivative (PID) control are, respectively, established to compute the optimal front wheel steering angle and vehicle longitudinal torque under lateral and longitudinal decoupling. Additionally, a direct yaw moment controller is constructed based on model predictive control to calculate the additional yaw moment, which is then distributed according to the tire adhesion utilisation rate to optimise yaw stability in lane‐changing obstacle‐avoidance scenarios. Finally, the proposed control framework is verified in typical obstacle‐avoidance scenarios. The results show that, compared to the control method that do not consider yaw stability, the average yaw rate deviation is reduced by 54.0% on high‐adhesion road surfaces and by 61.2% on low‐adhesion road surfaces, achieving further optimsation in the safety and stability of the obstacle‐avoidance process.
Q1

A two‐layer control strategy for fuel‐efficient connected vehicles
Bentaleb A., Hajjaji A.E., Karama A., Rabhi A., Benzaouia A.
AbstractThis paper proposes a two‐layer control strategy to enhance connected vehicles fuel efficiency. Compared with previous works, this study proposes an approach to optimize both the vehicle speed and gearbox position to achieve better fuel efficiency. The control task is given in two stages: the upper layer and the lower layer. Before trip departure, the upper layer concurrently optimizes the vehicle speed and gearbox position based on road map information, and engine and vehicle parameters for an entire route. Then, while driving, the lower layer is used to follow the pre‐computed optimal profiles. Model predictive control follows the optimal speed while ensuring an adaptive safe distance constraint with a preceding vehicle. For gear shifting, an online shift control assuring the tracking of the optimal gear position is developed based on look‐ahead road data and vehicle actions. The effectiveness of the proposed control strategy was evaluated with comprehensive simulations and comparison tests using Matlab and CarSim software. The mean online optimization calculation time is 0.065 s, indicating its real‐time capability. The proposed method can be used as a driving assist system or implemented as a speed and gear controller for self‐driving vehicles.
Q1

An activity scheduling and multi‐agent micro‐simulation platform (ASMMSP) based on long‐term cellular data and considering multi‐mode transfer
Zhou J., Yang F., Guo Y., Wang L., Yao Z.
AbstractWith the growth of urban residential density, cities have developed into metropolitan, resulting in increasingly complex individual travel behaviours. These developments pose challenges to current simulation models in activity scheduling. This paper proposed an activity scheduling and multi‐agent micro‐simulation platform (ASMMSP). By incorporating long‐term cellular data, the platform can eliminate the reliance on personal attributes in activity scheduling, which improves the simulation flexibility and accuracy. ASMMSP also focuses on transfer behaviours between different travel modes. The platform comprises three systems: agent, public transportation, and road network. At each moment, agents evaluate their current states and activity schedules, then change schedules based on the comparison results, current travel conditions, and historical travels. ASMMSP reconstructs the traffic condition within the research area by integrating the current traffic flow and activity schedules iteratively. Furthermore, ASMMSP allows for observation of real‐time traffic conditions. It also enables adjustments to public transportation, road network structure, and traffic volume, which can simulate the traffic impact from emergencies, gatherings, road maintenance, and public transportation adjustments. These functions support traffic models applied in traffic planning, development, and construction. Finally, this paper demonstrates the above capabilities through two case studies in the first ring road of Chengdu.
Q1

Implications of as‐built highway horizontal curves on vehicle dynamics/kinematics characteristics under adaptive cruise control
Wang S., Lai Y., Qiu X., Ma Y., Easa S.M., Zheng Y.
AbstractDue to road curvature and sensors’ limited field of view, as‐built highway curves would pose an operational challenge to the adaptive cruise control (ACC) system and its shared control. However, very few studies explored the adaptability of ACC system‐dedicated vehicles (V‐ACC) considering the vehicle‐road geometry interaction. Therefore, the objectives of this study are twofold: (i) investigating the implications of horizontal curves on V‐ACC dynamics and kinematics characteristics; and (ii) evaluating V‐ACC's adaptability from the safety, comfort, and speed consistency (S‐C‐S) aspects. To this end, a PreScan/CarSim/MATLAB/Simulink co‐simulation platform is established and it is validated by OpenACC database followed by designing many tests featuring circular curve radius (RC), desired speed (Vde), and clearance. The impact mechanism of geometric features was analysed by interpreting dynamics and kinematics characteristics along curves and critical features were further extracted by reference to S‐C‐S thresholds. The results show that: (i) either smaller RC or higher Vde causes those characteristics toward their S‐C‐S margins; (ii) neither sideslip nor rollover occurs, and speed consistency is good in most RC conditions; and (iii) drivers can follow the leading car comfortably with Vde = 40, 80–100 km/h but feel uncomfortable when Vde = 50–70 km/h and RC approaches its lower bounds.
Q1

A lightweight social cognitive risk potential field model for path planning with dedicated dynamic and static traffic factors
Guo S., Zheng S., Li J., Zhou Q., Xu H.
AbstractDriving risk assessment is crucial for autonomous vehicles to guarantee driving safety and traffic efficiency. Risk field models with insufficient consideration of traffic factors are not reliable enough to provide effective support for automated driving tasks, and those highly complex models with numerous uncertain coefficients also limit the execution of automated driving tasks. Inspired by Coulomb's law, this paper proposes a new lightweight social cognitive driving risk potential field model by leveraging interaction forces between charges to explore the effects of dynamic and static traffic factors on driving risks. Through complexity analysis, the number of coefficients in the proposed model was reduced by 36%–50% compared to other models. With parametric analysis and sensitivity analysis, the model's reliability was demonstrated. A path planner was designed by integrating the proposed driving risk field model into a model predictive controller for validating the efficacy of the proposed risk potential field model. The planned path with the proposed risk field model was also compared with existing risk potential field models. Results indicate that the proposed model can effectively account for both dynamic and static traffic factors, thereby supporting the path planner to generate highly adaptable paths for complex traffic scenarios.
Q1

Identifying abnormal driving states of drunk drivers using UAV
Zhou G., Xu K., Chen J., Mao L.
AbstractThe rising number of car owners has increased the frequency of drunk driving‐related traffic accidents, which is a significant danger to traffic safety. Many drawbacks of traditional drunk driving detection techniques include missed detection, interference with regular drivers, inadequate real‐time monitoring, and excessive labour costs. In this work, the intent is to increase the accuracy, real‐time performance, and coverage of drunk driving detection by proposing a method for differentiating abnormal driving conditions while intoxicated by utilizing unmanned aerial vehicle technology. The approach uses an unmanned aerial vehicle to identify the driver's facial expression to determine whether there is an evidence of drunk driving behaviour is drunk driving behaviour. It then uses these models to score vehicle trajectory anomalies, including vehicle sway, vehicle sudden speed change, and signalized intersection waiting time. According to the trial data, the system can successfully identify drunk drivers, and its accuracy has increased by 10.8% compared to the high accuracy and real‐time performance of traditional drunk driving detection methods.
Q1

Train operation simulation and capacity analysis for a high‐speed maglev station
Deng L., Zhang Y., Jing E., Li Y., Li H.
AbstractFocusing on the transportation organization characteristics of the high‐speed maglev station, this article simulates the train operation process based on the train running calculation and the train operation scheme for multi‐type trains, and analyzes the station capacity based on the simulation for multi‐type trains and typical‐layout stations. This study is carried out from the following three perspectives: (i) calculating train running in the train operation process, (ii) calculating the carrying capacity for single‐type trains, and (iii) simulating the train operation scheme at the station. By analyzing the running process and working conditions of a high‐speed maglev train during various operations, a kinematic model for the train running and a simulation method for the technical operation process based on the operation calculation are established. The simulation results for train running calculation are then used to determine the time required and the capacity for the station handing single‐type trains, which is the basis of analyzing multi‐type trains operations. In the simulation for operations of multi‐type trains, three simulation strategies are designed: track selection strategy, route segment lock/unlock strategy, and operation method choosing strategy. The operational process of a high‐speed maglev station under multi‐train and multi‐technology conditions is simulated based on the above strategies, and the capacity utilization of the station is calculated. The capacity utilization characteristics of typical‐layout stations and the recommended layouts for stations under different scenarios are given for capacity analysis and optimization.
Q1

A study on identifying representative trips for mobility service design
Kim J., Tak S., Yoon J., Yeo H.
AbstractRecently, with growing interest in urban mobility patterns, the demand for collecting and analysing origin‐destination (OD) data is increasing. Due to the large scale and dimensionality of OD data, there are two issues in analysing the data: big‐data storage and major pattern extraction. To deal with two issues at the same time, this study suggests a principal control analysis‐based major demand identification method to improve the usability of microscopic OD data. Especially, this study focuses on finding principal components that preserve major patterns from OD data with small random noise so that the data can be effectively used for mobility service design. The proposed method is applied to smart card data of Seoul and Sejong and extracted major demand patterns from peak‐ and non‐peak hour data of these cities. The degree of daily regularity, reconstruction accuracy, and compression rate of the reconstructed data is analysed varying sets of principal components. The obtained results show that the major demands contain a low volume and a large volume of demand and with lower‐order principal components, major demands can be efficiently extracted by removing randomly appearing small‐volume demand. In addition, the trade‐off behaviour is observed between the degree of daily regularity and reconstruction accuracy depending on the compression rate. Based on the observations, it can be found that the loss of major demand patterns could be prevented when targeting a reconstruction accuracy of 90–95% and the proposed method can reduce the data size while preserving major mobility patterns.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
Eastern European Economics
304 citations, 6.55%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
296 citations, 6.38%
|
|
Post-Communist Economies
130 citations, 2.8%
|
|
Sustainability
82 citations, 1.77%
|
|
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
51 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Applied Economics
49 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja
47 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Economic Systems
43 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Economics of Transition
37 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Economies
36 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Economics
29 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Economic Modelling
27 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Comparative Economic Studies
24 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Eurasian Geography and Economics
24 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of East-West Business
24 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Prague Economic Papers
24 citations, 0.52%
|
|
World Economy
24 citations, 0.52%
|
|
International Review of Economics and Finance
23 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
23 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Economic Change and Restructuring
23 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Empirica
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Baltic Journal of Economics
21 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Acta Oeconomica
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Applied Economics Letters
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
PLoS ONE
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of International Trade and Economic Development
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Politicka Ekonomie
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal of Finance and Economics
18 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Cogent Economics and Finance
18 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
18 citations, 0.39%
|
|
South East European Journal of Economics and Business
17 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
17 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Economic Studies
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Business Review
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Research in International Business and Finance
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Economic Analysis and Policy
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Communist and Post-Communist Studies
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IMF Working Paper
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Europe-Asia Studies
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Policy Modeling
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Mathematics
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Planning Studies
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
World Development
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic)
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
SAGE Open
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Contributions to Economics
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Economic Surveys
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Emerging Markets Review
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Open Economies Review
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Manpower
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Business Economics and Management
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of International Management
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Review of Financial Analysis
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Energies
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Corporate Governance (Bingley)
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
11 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Empirical Economics
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Singapore Economic Review
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Review of World Economics
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Land Use Policy
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
10 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Economic Annals
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Annals of Regional Science
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Economia Politica
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Common Market Studies
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Handbook of Research on In-Country Determinants and Implications of Foreign Land Acquisitions
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Eurasian Economic Review
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Regional Studies
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Review of Applied Economics
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energy Policy
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Economics
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Growth and Change
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Urban and Regional Studies
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Economic Journal
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Energy Economics
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Comparative Economic Research
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Economics and Economic Policy
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Business History
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Spatial Science
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Papers in Regional Science
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Global Business Review
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Risks
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Land
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
South African Journal of Economics
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Review of International Economics
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Kybernetes
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Voprosy Ekonomiki
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1087 citations, 23.43%
|
|
Elsevier
583 citations, 12.57%
|
|
Springer Nature
527 citations, 11.36%
|
|
Wiley
350 citations, 7.54%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
293 citations, 6.32%
|
|
Emerald
267 citations, 5.76%
|
|
MDPI
209 citations, 4.51%
|
|
SAGE
146 citations, 3.15%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
79 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Vysoka Skola Ekonomicka
43 citations, 0.93%
|
|
IGI Global
41 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Oxford University Press
36 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
29 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
23 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
World Scientific
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
18 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
17 citations, 0.37%
|
|
University of California Press
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Monetary Fund
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
CAIRN
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
EDP Sciences
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Ekonomski Fakultet
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Alexandru Ioan Cuza - University of Iasi
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Savez Ekonomista Vojvodine
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AKI Agrárközgazdasági Intézet Nonprofit Kft
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
MIT Press
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japan Association for Comparative Economic Studies
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Brill
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Index Copernicus
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hanyang University
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Academic Journals
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hans Publishers
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Inderscience Publishers
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Canadian Association of Slavists
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Publications
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Editura Economica
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institut de Sciences Mathematiques et Economiques Appliquees
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
HACCP Consulting
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Berkeley Electronic Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Dnipro University of Technology
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Food and Agribusiness Management Association
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit, Instituut voor Culturele en Sociale Antropologie, University Of Nijmegen
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Polibijaus Fondas
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
SGH Warsaw School of Economics
24 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
20 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Tallinn University of Technology
20 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Warsaw
19 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Charles University
18 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
13 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Maribor
12 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Belgrade
10 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Primorska
9 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje
8 publications, 0.48%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Poznań University of Economics and Business
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Kozminski University
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Lodz
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Tartu
7 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
German Institute for Economic Research
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Barcelona
6 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Gdańsk University of Technology
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Łazarski University
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Sarajevo
5 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Halle Institute for Economic Research
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Technical University of Košice
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Sussex
4 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Bilkent University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Seoul National University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Central European University, Budapest
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Thessaly
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Hitotsubashi University
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Coimbra
3 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Ural Federal University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Hacettepe University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Ankara University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Akdeniz University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Uppsala University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Southeast University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Ashoka University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Siena
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Debrecen
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Corvinus University of Budapest
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Leipzig University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Technical University of Ostrava
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Wrocław University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Comenius University Bratislava
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Joint Research Center Seville
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Brigham Young University
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Houston
2 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
American University of Armenia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Taif University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Tabuk
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Çankaya University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Sabanci University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Management and Technology
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Izmir University of Economics
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Gaziantep University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Istanbul Medeniyet University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Government College University, Lahore
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Christ University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Mersin University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
RMIT Vietnam
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Antalya Bilim University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Charles University
7 publications, 3.98%
|
|
University of Belgrade
7 publications, 3.98%
|
|
Kozminski University
5 publications, 2.84%
|
|
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje
5 publications, 2.84%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
5 publications, 2.84%
|
|
Technical University of Košice
4 publications, 2.27%
|
|
SGH Warsaw School of Economics
4 publications, 2.27%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
3 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies
3 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Warsaw
3 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of Lodz
3 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Ural Federal University
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Ashoka University
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Thessaly
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Poznań University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Bilkent University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ankara University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Taif University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Tabuk
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Çankaya University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Akdeniz University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Management and Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Lahore
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Symbiosis International University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Istanbul Medeniyet University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Government College University, Lahore
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Christ University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
RMIT Vietnam
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Antalya Bilim University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
American University of the Middle East
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Southeast University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
ETH Zurich
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Fribourg
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Gdańsk University of Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Qingdao University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Chieti-Pescara
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Reykjavik University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Seoul National University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Hanyang University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Illinois State University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Halle Institute for Economic Research
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Tilburg University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Purdue University Fort Wayne
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Leipzig University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bremen
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Webster Vienna Private University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Hitotsubashi University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Sorbonne Paris Nord University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Łazarski University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Wrocław University of Economics and Business
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Ontario Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Comenius University Bratislava
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Tartu
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Université Clermont Auvergne
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Houston
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University College Dublin
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
South East European University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Bournemouth University
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
University of Nova Gorica
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Tallinn University of Technology
1 publication, 0.57%
|
|
Show all (69 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
Poland
|
Poland, 140, 8.38%
Poland
140 publications, 8.38%
|
USA
|
USA, 69, 4.13%
USA
69 publications, 4.13%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 62, 3.71%
Hungary
62 publications, 3.71%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 53, 3.17%
Czech Republic
53 publications, 3.17%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 49, 2.93%
Germany
49 publications, 2.93%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 48, 2.87%
Slovenia
48 publications, 2.87%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 47, 2.81%
Romania
47 publications, 2.81%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 44, 2.63%
Czechoslovakia
44 publications, 2.63%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 28, 1.68%
Estonia
28 publications, 1.68%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 28, 1.68%
Italy
28 publications, 1.68%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 28, 1.68%
Turkey
28 publications, 1.68%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 25, 1.5%
United Kingdom
25 publications, 1.5%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 22, 1.32%
Yugoslavia
22 publications, 1.32%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 20, 1.2%
Austria
20 publications, 1.2%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 20, 1.2%
Serbia
20 publications, 1.2%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 18, 1.08%
Slovakia
18 publications, 1.08%
|
France
|
France, 17, 1.02%
France
17 publications, 1.02%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 16, 0.96%
Spain
16 publications, 0.96%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 15, 0.9%
North Macedonia
15 publications, 0.9%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 15, 0.9%
Croatia
15 publications, 0.9%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 13, 0.78%
Russia
13 publications, 0.78%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 12, 0.72%
Bulgaria
12 publications, 0.72%
|
China
|
China, 11, 0.66%
China
11 publications, 0.66%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 11, 0.66%
Belgium
11 publications, 0.66%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 10, 0.6%
Ukraine
10 publications, 0.6%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 9, 0.54%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
9 publications, 0.54%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 8, 0.48%
Netherlands
8 publications, 0.48%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 0.42%
Greece
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.42%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 7, 0.42%
Kosovo
7 publications, 0.42%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 6, 0.36%
Switzerland
6 publications, 0.36%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 5, 0.3%
Lithuania
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 5, 0.3%
Montenegro
5 publications, 0.3%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.24%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.24%
Japan
4 publications, 0.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 3, 0.18%
Australia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 3, 0.18%
Albania
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 3, 0.18%
Armenia
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.18%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.18%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.18%
India
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.18%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.18%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.18%
Norway
3 publications, 0.18%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 0.12%
Canada
2 publications, 0.12%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.12%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.12%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.12%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.12%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 2, 0.12%
USSR
2 publications, 0.12%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.06%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.06%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.06%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.06%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.06%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.06%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.06%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.06%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.06%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.06%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.06%
Peru
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.06%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.06%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.06%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.06%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (34 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Poland
|
Poland, 28, 15.91%
Poland
28 publications, 15.91%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 27, 15.34%
Romania
27 publications, 15.34%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 21, 11.93%
Czech Republic
21 publications, 11.93%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 15, 8.52%
Serbia
15 publications, 8.52%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 15, 8.52%
Turkey
15 publications, 8.52%
|
USA
|
USA, 12, 6.82%
USA
12 publications, 6.82%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 12, 6.82%
Slovakia
12 publications, 6.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 5.11%
Germany
9 publications, 5.11%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 4.55%
United Kingdom
8 publications, 4.55%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 7, 3.98%
Russia
7 publications, 3.98%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 7, 3.98%
North Macedonia
7 publications, 3.98%
|
France
|
France, 6, 3.41%
France
6 publications, 3.41%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 5, 2.84%
Ukraine
5 publications, 2.84%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 2.27%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 2.27%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 2.27%
Slovenia
4 publications, 2.27%
|
Kosovo
|
Kosovo, 4, 2.27%
Kosovo
4 publications, 2.27%
|
China
|
China, 3, 1.7%
China
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 1.7%
Greece
3 publications, 1.7%
|
India
|
India, 3, 1.7%
India
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1.7%
Italy
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 1.7%
Kuwait
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 3, 1.7%
Montenegro
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 1.7%
Switzerland
3 publications, 1.7%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 1.14%
Estonia
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.14%
Austria
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 1.14%
Armenia
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 1.14%
Belgium
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2, 1.14%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.14%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 1.14%
Lithuania
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 1.14%
Croatia
2 publications, 1.14%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.57%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.57%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.57%
Albania
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.57%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.57%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.57%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.57%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.57%
Spain
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.57%
Canada
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.57%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.57%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.57%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.57%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.57%
Peru
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.57%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.57%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.57%
Japan
1 publication, 0.57%
|
Show all (18 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
1 profile journal article
Eduard Narcis
20 publications,
12 citations
h-index: 2