Geoarchaeology - An International Journal
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.4
SJR
0.871
CiteScore
3.6
Categories
Archeology
Archeology (arts and humanities)
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1986-2024
journal names
Geoarchaeology - An International Journal
Geoarchaeology
Top-3 citing journals

Geoarchaeology - An International Journal
(1840 citations)

Quaternary International
(1220 citations)

Journal of Archaeological Science
(1093 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Arizona
(78 publications)

University of Wisconsin–Madison
(35 publications)

University of Cambridge
(29 publications)

University of Arizona
(10 publications)

University of Tübingen
(9 publications)

University College London
(7 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 395
Q3

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of solite RE black and HyFlex remover systems for endodontic retreatment - An in vitro nano-computed tomography analysis
Valan A.S., Solete P., Antony S.D., Ramamoorthi S., Alasqah M., Arunachalam V.
Abstract
Introduction:
The successful outcome of endodontic retreatment heavily relies on the thorough removal of root canal filling materials. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the efficacy of various retreatment file systems using nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) imaging.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty recently extracted human mandibular molars with mesial roots having curvatures <20° were chosen and sectioned to 16 mm in length. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Gold system up to size F2 and they were filled with gutta percha and AH Plus sealer. After obturation, all the samples were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 15 each) for retreatment: Group 1 utilized Solite RE Black retreatment files, while Group 2 employed Coltene HyFlex Remover files. Nano-CT imaging was employed to measure pre- and postoperative volumes of remaining filling material and remaining dentin thickness and the time taken for retreatment was measured in seconds. The obtained values were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05).
Results:
Nano-CT analysis showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the volume of remaining filling material between the Solite RE Black and Coltene HyFlex Remover groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the time required for gutta-percha removal. The Solite RE Black system showed comparatively less dentin removal than the Coltene HyFlex Remover system (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The Solite RE Black retreatment file system demonstrated promising efficacy in removing filling material while preserving dentin integrity compared to the Coltene HyFlex Remover system. These findings support its potential as an effective tool for endodontic retreatment, emphasizing the need for further clinical trials to validate its performance across various clinical scenarios.
Q3

Evaluating generative pretraining transformer reliability in addressing dental trauma: A cross-sectional observational study on avulsion and intrusion
Bordin R.W., Bartnack C.C., Westphalen V.P., Gasparello G.G., Bark M.J., Gava T.N., Tanaka O.M.
Abstract
Introduction:
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized digital communication, enhancing interactions between humans and computers. This study explores the application of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5), in providing accurate information on dental trauma.
Materials and Methods:
Utilizing a dataset of 45 self-generated questions across three topics, general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion, ChatGPT-3.5 generated responses that were subsequently evaluated by five endodontic experts, each with over a decade of experience. The evaluators used a Likert scale to assess the quality of the AI-generated answers, synthesizing reliable scientific evidence and clinical expertise to ensure a thorough analysis. The data obtained from the evaluators’ scores were organized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25. For each question, descriptive statistics including the median and interquartile range were computed.
Results:
The study found that ChatGPT provided reliable information across the three assessed dental topics. Avulsion was rated the highest (4.40 ± 0.717), significantly outperforming general dental trauma (3.97 ± 0.885) (P = 0.005). Intrusion received a rating of 4.13 ± 0.794, showing no significant difference compared to the other topics. Most evaluator scores fell into the “Good” (44.0%) and “Very Good” (38.7%) categories. This indicates a generally positive appraisal of ChatGPT’s performance, with a fair agreement among evaluators, evidenced by a combined Fleiss’s kappa coefficient of 0.324. However, there was variability, particularly with Evaluator 4’s scores differing significantly from those of evaluators 1 and 2.
Conclusions:
ChatGPT’s responses on general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion were generally rated positively, with avulsion responses deemed the most reliable. The study underscores the need for continuous evaluation to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and safety of AI-generated content in endodontics, suggesting AI should serve as a supplementary tool rather than a primary information source.
Q3

Agreement between students’ self/peer and faculty assessments of the radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses
Awooda E.M., Elzaki W.M., Al-Nazhan S.A.
Abstract
Introduction:
This study investigated the agreement between students’ self-assessment or peer assessment and faculty assessment of the quality of root canal treatment (RCT) performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses.
Materials and Methods:
This cross-sectional study enrolled 23 4th-year students and a faculty member from the University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Sudan. The radiographic technical quality of RCTs performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses was evaluated by the students themselves, their peers, and faculty members in terms of the obturation length, shape, and density. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare self-peer and faculty assessments. P < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
Results:
No statistically significant differences were observed among the three assessment groups in terms of the quality of RCTs performed during the preclinical course. However, statistically significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments (P = 0.014), and between self- and faculty assessments (P = 0.005), which may be attributable to lower confidence among students when working on real patients, leading to lower self-assessment scores.
Conclusion:
Significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments and faculty assessments in the quality of RCT performed during the clinical course, with students underrating their performance. Formative assessment of learning rather than summative assessment, during endodontic courses, is recommended at the end of academic year.
Q3

Persistent pain in maxillary premolars following root canal treatment with apical transportation: A report of two cases without periapical pathology
Ong T.K.
Abstract
Persistent pain after endodontic treatment is often associated with evidence of periapical pathology. Nonetheless, this case report presents two instances of persistent pain in maxillary premolars post root canal treatment (RCT), without evident periapical radiolucency on imaging. A 35-year-old Asian female experienced dull, aching pain on biting in tooth #25, whereas a 40-year-old Caucasian female reported similar symptoms in tooth #15. Both teeth showed tenderness to percussion but not palpation. Periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans revealed completed RCT with apical transportation but no detectable periapical pathology. Thus, both teeth were diagnosed as previously treated with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Non-surgical retreatment successfully addressed untreated canal spaces, resolving symptoms. This report suggested persistent pain following RCT might stem from endodontic reasons, even in the absence of visible apical pathology on CBCT scans, highlighting the importance of thorough canal debridement to resolve symptoms associated with untreated canal spaces in apical transportation. Furthermore, this case report demonstrates that clinicians should make a diagnosis through thorough dental history and other clinical investigations, without relying solely on CBCT for the diagnosis of posttreatment endodontic pain.
Q3

Tampon approach in vital pulp therapy: Advancing endodontic care for permanent dentition
Asgary S.
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Comprehensive management of complex resorptive lesions: Report of two cases
Ray A.B., Mayya A., Ghosh S., Rai N., Acharya S.R., Chatra A., Shettigar L.S.
Abstract
In the field of endodontics, the management of complex resorptive lesions demands innovative and precise interventions. This report delineates the comprehensive management of two distinct cases, each presenting unique challenges. The first case involved a 23-year-old male with hypothyroidism, presenting with pain and external cervical resorption with internal communication in his lower left front tooth. The case was diagnosed with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The second case involved a 26-year-old female in good health, dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance, and experiencing occasional pain from a previously treated upper front tooth with concurrent external apical and internal resorption. It was diagnosed as previously treated, with symptomatic apical periodontitis. These cases were notable for their complexity and the tailored approach to diagnosis and treatment, employing advanced techniques and materials, such as bioceramic materials, for optimal outcomes. The first case was approached through conventional endodontic disinfection, flap reflection, and the meticulous external management of the resorptive defect with bioceramic material, followed by restorative procedures. The second case required retreatment, including wide canal management, apex negotiation, and the establishment of an apical plug with bioceramic material, culminating in backfilling with thermoplasticized gutta-percha and subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. Remarkably, both cases demonstrated successful healing and patient satisfaction at a 6-month follow-up, with radiographs and photographs evidencing the desired clinical outcomes. This report highlights the necessity of adaptability, precision, and the integration of innovative materials and techniques in endodontic practice to effectively address complex resorptive lesions. It underscores the significance of a comprehensive diagnostic and treatment framework that can guide clinical decision-making and enhance procedural outcomes in similar challenging scenarios. It contributes valuable insights and reinforces the imperative of detailed management in endodontic complexities.
Q3

A narrative review on applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics
Javed M.Q., Ali A.
Abstract
Nanotechnology in modern endodontics involves manipulating materials at the nanoscale to improve dental treatments, disinfection, imaging, and tissue engineering. This narrative review aims to evaluate the impact and applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics, focusing on advancements in materials, disinfection processes, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering while addressing associated challenges and safety concerns. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2024 across PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, COCHRANE Library, and Science Direct databases using MeSH terms/keywords such as “Nanotechnology,” “Endodontics,” “Disinfection,” and “Dental Tissue Engineering.” Articles published from March 2010 to March 2024 were considered, with inclusion criteria focusing on studies relevant to the objectives. From an initial pool of 774 articles, 86 were selected based on titles and abstracts, and 45 were shortlisted after full-text evaluation. The review highlights significant advancements in nanotechnology in endodontic materials, disinfection methods, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering. Nanomaterials have improved the efficiency, precision, and biocompatibility of dental treatments. However, challenges such as long-term biocompatibility, standardization of applications, and patient safety remain to be addressed. Continuous research, ethical practices, and regulatory oversight are crucial for integrating nanotechnology into endodontics. While nanotechnology offers promising advancements in endodontics, ongoing research and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are essential to harness its full potential and ensure patient safety. Limitations of this review include potential biases in article selection and the evolving nature of nanotechnology research.
Q3

News
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Evaluating the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: An in vitro pilot study
Mortazavi S., Hasanpour S., Anbiaee N., Rouhani A., Naghavi N., Babazadeh S., Shiezadeh I.
Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs).
Materials and Methods:
In this study, 20 single-canal premolar teeth without cracks and internal resorption were selected and after root canal treatment, divided into two: experimental and control groups. In each of the teeth in the experimental group, an artificial fracture was created with the SANTAM device, then the teeth of both groups were randomly placed in the dental sockets of a dry mandible, and after preparing CBCT images of the teeth, the images were processed by reverse contrast software. Initial and reverse contrast images were examined by two radiologists and two endodontists. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22.
Results:
Observers reported higher sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value in normal contrast images than in reverse contrast images, but the specificity reported by endodontists in reverse contrast images was slightly higher than in normal contrast images. In comparing the results of radiologists and endodontists, there was a significant agreement in the review of the initial images (κ =0/59), but there was no significant agreement in the images with reverse contrast (κ = −0/1). There was not any notable distinction observed in the assessment of normal and reverse contrast images among the observers, nor in the comparison between radiologists and endodontists, except for the examination of normal contrast images by the two groups of radiologists and endodontists (P = 0.00). From this, it can be inferred that the diagnostic power of reverse contrast images in identifying VRFs is inferior to that of normal contrast images (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
According to the obtained results, it was concluded that reverse contrast CBCT images are not effective in diagnosing VRFs and cause error in diagnosis.
Q3

Antibacterial activity and smear layer removal efficiency of silver nanoparticles as a final irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis using confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy
Chandran N., Ramesh S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered significant attention for their potent antibacterial properties, making them promising candidates for use as root canal irrigants in endodontics. The persistent presence of Enterococcus faecalis in treated root canals often leads to endodontic failures. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neem-synthesized AgNPs, chemically synthesized AgNPs, sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and saline solution in reducing viable bacteria and removing smear layers in E. faecalis-infected mandibular premolar teeth.
Materials and Methods:
After decoronation, mandibular premolar, single-rooted, teeth (120) were instrumented until ProTaper Gold F3. In all samples, inoculation of E. faecalis was done and divided into four groups depending on the irrigating solution used into Group A: neem-synthesized AgNPs, Group B: chemically synthesized AgNPs, Group C: sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and Group D: saline solution. After irrigation, roots were divided longitudinally and analyzed for confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Results:
The minimum reduction in live bacteria percentage was seen in Group C rather than Groups A and B; although there was no significant difference between them. Group D showed the maximum percentage of live bacteria and a greatest score of smear layer compared to other groups. In contrast to Group B, Group A scored higher, although the results were nonsignificant. Group C showed the least score of smear layer presence. The P value between the experimental groups was found to be <0.05, indicating statistical significance.
Conclusion:
Both neem-synthesized AgNp and sodium hypochlorite irrigants reduced the proportion of viable bacteria most significantly. This work demonstrates the possibility of employing nanoparticles as an irrigant that can effectively remove smear layers while also acting as an antimicrobial.
Q3

Endodontic management of mandibular permanent canine with two roots and two root canals using cone-beam computed tomography
Alfahadi H.R., Alyami Y.A., Alkazman F.H., Al Fadhil M.H., Alyami S.A., Alyami A.M., Alsalem M.F.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the root canal systems of various human teeth can facilitate successful root canal treatment. The mandibular canines typically have one root and one canal. Mandibular canines with two roots are uncommon. This case report describes the examination of occlusion erosion and deep caries that had reached the pulp chamber in the mandibular canine of a 56-year-old healthy Saudi female patient referred to the endodontic clinic for evaluating the left mandibular canine. Radiographic evaluation revealed a widening of the periodontal ligament and periapical radiolucency and the presence of two roots. Two roots with two root canals were observed on cone-beam computed tomography. The tooth responded to a sensitivity test and was tender upon percussion and palpation. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosis were established, and nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed using a dental operating microscope. At follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had completely disappeared.
Q3

Use of bioactive glass in combination with or without calcium hydroxide changes the biological and mechanical properties of dentin: An in vitro study
Salkoska Yildizbas A., Uysal B.A., Kucuk Keles O., Belli S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is the most commonly used medicament in endodontics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bioactive glass (BG) use with or without Ca(OH)2 on the biological and mechanical properties of dentin.
Materials and Methods:
Standard holes were created to simulate root canals on 84 dentin slices. Four groups were formed according to the medicament placed in the root canals: Ca(OH)2; Ca(OH)2 + 7% BG; BG and control. Scanning electron microscopy analysis to evaluate the dentin surfaces exposed to the test medicaments and energy dispersive X-ray analysis to observe apatite formation were used on the 1st, 7th, and 14th days. X-ray diffraction measurements were performed to investigate mineral phase formation. Microhardness and pH measurements were also carried out. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
The Ca(OH)2 and control groups showed the highest Ca and P mineral content on the 14th day, whereas the lowest Ca and P content was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). A gradual decrease in crystal formation was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group from the 1st day to the 14th day. The highest microhardness measurements were also recorded in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). The Ca(OH)2 + BG group showed the highest pH measurements (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Ca(OH)2 + BG can be an alternative intracanal medicament. Further studies should be performed to determine the clinical implications of this combination.
Q3

Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal and dentin wettability using 1% phytic acid with and without 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles: An in vitro study
Halkai R., Halkai K.R., Mahveen S.U.
Abstract
Introduction:
The success of endodontic treatment depends on the complete removal of the smear layer from the root canal and the enhanced wettability of the irrigants employed during treatment. However, none of the irrigants efficiently accomplish this; thus, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the elimination of the smear layer and wettability of root dentin using the combination of 0.2% Chitosan nanoparticles(CSN) with 1% phytic acid (PA).
Materials and Methods:
About 100 extracted single-rooted human premolar teeth were decoronated and standardized to 13 mm root length. Fifty specimens were tested for smear layer removal and another half for wettability (n = 50) after final irrigation in five groups: Group 1 – normal saline (control), Group 2 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group 3 – 17% EDTA with 0.2% CSN, Group 4 – 1% PA, and Group 5 – 1% PA with 0.2% CSN. After root canal instrumentation and final irrigation, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope for the smear layer. Wettability was determined using dentin blocks obtained (n = 50) by resecting the apical third of each specimen, treated with irrigants in aforementioned groups, and the contact angle was measured using a goniometer. Statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
A combination of 1% PA with 0.2% CSN showed higher smear layer removal and increased wettability.
Conclusions:
The incorporation of 0.2% CSN to 1% PA was effective in removing the smear layer and increased the dentinal wettability.
Q3

A cross-sectional study on awareness regarding management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns
Ikhile F.O., Enabulele J.E.
Abstract
Introduction:
Dental trauma could lead to separation or crushing of the dental supporting tissues and esthetic and functional disorders. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns in Benin City, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire containing 15 closed and open-ended questions to garner data focused on sociodemograhic characteristics and awareness of the management of traumatic dental injury, from respondents. Data from 95 respondents were statistically analyzed and both univariate and bivariate analyses were used in this study.
Results:
A significant proportion; 77 (81.1%) had a poor overall knowledge of management, although most respondents had knowledge of some of the steps involved in emergency management of dental trauma. The association between respondents’ level of education and their knowledge of the management of dental trauma was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Respondents at higher level in their dental training were found to have better overall knowledge compared to those at lower levels.
Conclusion:
The knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among the respondents was poor. This was associated with the level of study and clinical exposure.
Q3
Navigating endodontic outcomes through cone-beam computed tomography: A narrative review
Zahran S.S., Mirdad L.H.
Abstract
Periapical radiographs (PRs) have been the most reliable modality for assessing periapical health. Later, the evolution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revolutionized three-dimensional maxillofacial skeletal imaging. CBCT imaging has emerged as a superior diagnostic tool compared to PR. The aim of this narrative review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes related to the use of CBCT in evaluating various endodontic treatments, including primary root canal treatments, secondary treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies and the associated prognostic factors. The research selection process involved systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for literature on CBCT and endodontics. Criteria included English-language; peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, reporting 1-year outcomes of various endodontic treatments using CBCT. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 18 outcome study articles utilizing CBCT to evaluate primary root canal treatment were selected, as well as 7 for secondary root canal retreatment, 3 for vital pulp therapy, and 11 articles pertaining to endodontic microsurgery. The outcomes revealed varying success rates and prognostic factors. Consistent with outcome research employing PRs, studies that utilized CBCT also exhibited substantial variability in factors affecting initial and secondary treatment outcomes. The rate of favorable outcomes was significantly lower when assessed with CBCT compared to PR. The results from utilizing CBCT for primary and secondary root canal treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies demonstrate diverse success rates and prognostic factors in comparison to outcomes based solely on PRs.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
|
Geoarchaeology - An International Journal
1840 citations, 8.58%
|
|
Quaternary International
1220 citations, 5.69%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Science
1093 citations, 5.1%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
918 citations, 4.28%
|
|
Quaternary Science Reviews
571 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series
571 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
515 citations, 2.4%
|
|
Holocene
279 citations, 1.3%
|
|
Geomorphology
278 citations, 1.3%
|
|
PLoS ONE
271 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Quaternary Research
267 citations, 1.25%
|
|
American Antiquity
251 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Catena
242 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Archaeometry
234 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
226 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Journal of Field Archaeology
209 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
187 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Human Evolution
182 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Earth-Science Reviews
181 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
165 citations, 0.77%
|
|
PaleoAmerica
159 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Archaeological Prospection
146 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology
136 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Environmental Archaeology
127 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Archaeological Research
124 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Scientific Reports
112 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Radiocarbon
111 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of Quaternary Science
110 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Latin American Antiquity
106 citations, 0.49%
|
|
World Archaeology
105 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Antiquity
97 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Plains Anthropologist
95 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Archaeology in Oceania
93 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Quaternary Geochronology
89 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Remote Sensing
84 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Lithic Technology
78 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
77 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
76 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Geoderma
75 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Ancient Mesoamerica
75 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
75 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Geosciences (Switzerland)
73 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Geological Society Special Publication
72 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
72 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Current Anthropology
71 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Minerals
71 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Archaeological Research in Asia
70 citations, 0.33%
|
|
The Kiva
69 citations, 0.32%
|
|
African Archaeological Review
69 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
67 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Land
64 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Marine Geology
62 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of World Prehistory
62 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Southeastern Archaeology
61 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Science
59 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Humans at the End of the Ice Age
58 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
51 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advances in Archaeological Practice
51 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of African Earth Sciences
50 citations, 0.23%
|
|
North American Archaeologist
50 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Arid Environments
47 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Boreas
46 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology
46 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Progress in Physical Geography
44 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Anthropologie
44 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Science advances
44 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Heritage
43 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Cultural Heritage
42 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
42 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Sedimentary Geology
41 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Anthropocene
40 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Sustainability
40 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
39 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
38 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
35 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Global and Planetary Change
35 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Evolutionary Anthropology
34 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Historical Archaeology
34 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Earth Sciences
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Heritage Science
31 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Coastal Research
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
E&G Quaternary Science Journal
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
29 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Geoheritage
28 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Paleolimnology
28 citations, 0.13%
|
|
European Journal of Archaeology
28 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Australian Archaeology
27 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
27 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applied Clay Science
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Radiation Measurements
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science and Technology of Archaeological Research
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nature
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America
26 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Quaternary
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Human Ecology
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Review of Anthropology
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Quaternary Science Advances
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Maps
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Elsevier
6914 citations, 32.24%
|
|
Wiley
3424 citations, 15.97%
|
|
Springer Nature
2945 citations, 13.73%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1457 citations, 6.79%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1440 citations, 6.72%
|
|
MDPI
623 citations, 2.91%
|
|
SAGE
407 citations, 1.9%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
273 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
145 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
117 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Copernicus
111 citations, 0.52%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
108 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Geological Society of London
95 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
82 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Arizona Archaeological and Historical Society
64 citations, 0.3%
|
|
OpenEdition
60 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Oxford University Press
57 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
50 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Geological Society of America
48 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
36 citations, 0.17%
|
|
The Royal Society
36 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
35 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Annual Reviews
33 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
32 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
32 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
30 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
29 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
27 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Kent State University
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
24 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Center for Western Studies
23 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOP Publishing
22 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
20 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Japan Association for Quaternary Research
20 citations, 0.09%
|
|
James Cook University
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
18 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Seismological Society of America (SSA)
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Maney Publishing
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Geologists' Association
16 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Eagle Hill Foundation
16 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Archaeological Institute of America
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Institute of archaeology and ethnography SB RAS
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Science in China Press
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Colorado
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Duke University Press
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PERSEE Program
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American School of Classical Studies
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Emerald
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Hawaii Press
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
European Association of Petroleum Geoscientists and Engineers
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Presses Universitaires de Provence
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Groupe des Methodes Pluridisciplinaires Contribuant a l'Archeologie
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tyumen Scientific Center of the SB RAS
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of York
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Geological Society of Korea
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Maison de la Geology
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editorial CSIC
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Wilson Ornithological Society
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Science of South Africa
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tokyo Geographical Society
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Russian Geographical Society
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Western North American Naturalist
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of California Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
University of Arizona
78 publications, 4.03%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
35 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Cambridge
29 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Washington
27 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Texas A&M University
27 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University College London
26 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
26 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Tübingen
23 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
20 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Toronto
20 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Boston University
19 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Michigan
19 publications, 0.98%
|
|
University of Haifa
18 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
17 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
16 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Arizona State University
16 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Cologne
16 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Stirling
16 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Ghent University
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Washington State University
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
15 publications, 0.78%
|
|
McMaster University
14 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Brigham Young University
14 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Tennessee
14 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
12 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Western Australia
12 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Oxford
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Wollongong
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of British Columbia
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Leiden University
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Saint Mary's University
11 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Southampton
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Newcastle University
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Minnesota
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Barcelona
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Utah
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of York
10 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Geological Survey of Israel
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Australian National University
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Padua
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Queensland
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Flinders University
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Harvard University
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Minnesota Duluth
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Calgary
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Granada
9 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Aarhus University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Stanford University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Tulane University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Kiel University
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Sheffield
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Université Laval
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
8 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Peking University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Basel
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Bergen
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Pisa
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Griffith University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Macquarie University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
La Trobe University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Southern Cross University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Oregon State University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Brown University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Leeds
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Valencia
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Texas Tech University
7 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Istanbul University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Bordeaux Montaigne University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Liverpool
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Florida State University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Cornell University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Sydney
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Iowa State University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Sannio
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Tokyo Metropolitan University
6 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
University of Arizona
10 publications, 4.35%
|
|
University of Tübingen
9 publications, 3.91%
|
|
University College London
7 publications, 3.04%
|
|
University of Western Australia
7 publications, 3.04%
|
|
University of Cologne
7 publications, 3.04%
|
|
Bordeaux Montaigne University
6 publications, 2.61%
|
|
University of Bergen
6 publications, 2.61%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Leiden University
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
Kiel University
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Zaragoza
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Barcelona
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of La Laguna
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of York
5 publications, 2.17%
|
|
University of Haifa
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of Bologna
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of Cambridge
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of Southampton
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
University of Adelaide
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Newcastle University
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
4 publications, 1.74%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Basel
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Oxford
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
La Trobe University
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Flinders University
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
James Cook University
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Valencia
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Reading
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Utah State University
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of the Republic
3 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Dokuz Eylül University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Nantes
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Al-Hussein Bin Talal University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Aarhus University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Padua
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Sorbonne University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Sydney
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Florence
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Wollongong
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Henan University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Seville
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Avignon University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Silesian University of Technology
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Institute of Geological Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Lodz
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Granada
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Murcia
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Exeter
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Oviedo
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Université Côte d'Azur
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Memphis
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Bournemouth University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
2 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
University of Tyumen
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Al Farabi Kazakh National University
1 publication, 0.43%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 899, 46.48%
USA
899 publications, 46.48%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 210, 10.86%
United Kingdom
210 publications, 10.86%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 127, 6.57%
Canada
127 publications, 6.57%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 105, 5.43%
Germany
105 publications, 5.43%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 85, 4.4%
Spain
85 publications, 4.4%
|
France
|
France, 81, 4.19%
France
81 publications, 4.19%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 77, 3.98%
Australia
77 publications, 3.98%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 73, 3.77%
Italy
73 publications, 3.77%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 55, 2.84%
Israel
55 publications, 2.84%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 38, 1.96%
Mexico
38 publications, 1.96%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 37, 1.91%
Belgium
37 publications, 1.91%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 35, 1.81%
Greece
35 publications, 1.81%
|
China
|
China, 29, 1.5%
China
29 publications, 1.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 26, 1.34%
Russia
26 publications, 1.34%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 25, 1.29%
Argentina
25 publications, 1.29%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 24, 1.24%
Turkey
24 publications, 1.24%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 21, 1.09%
Poland
21 publications, 1.09%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 1.03%
Netherlands
20 publications, 1.03%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 17, 0.88%
Brazil
17 publications, 0.88%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 17, 0.88%
Chile
17 publications, 0.88%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 16, 0.83%
South Africa
16 publications, 0.83%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 15, 0.78%
New Zealand
15 publications, 0.78%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 15, 0.78%
Switzerland
15 publications, 0.78%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 14, 0.72%
Egypt
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 14, 0.72%
Japan
14 publications, 0.72%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 13, 0.67%
Portugal
13 publications, 0.67%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 13, 0.67%
Austria
13 publications, 0.67%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 12, 0.62%
Norway
12 publications, 0.62%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 11, 0.57%
Denmark
11 publications, 0.57%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 10, 0.52%
Czech Republic
10 publications, 0.52%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 0.47%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 0.47%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 0.41%
Ireland
8 publications, 0.41%
|
Guam
|
Guam, 7, 0.36%
Guam
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 0.36%
Sweden
7 publications, 0.36%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.31%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.31%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 5, 0.26%
Ukraine
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.26%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.26%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.26%
India
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.26%
Iran
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 0.26%
Finland
5 publications, 0.26%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 4, 0.21%
Jordan
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 4, 0.21%
Panama
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.21%
Romania
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.21%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0.21%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.16%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 3, 0.16%
Guatemala
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 3, 0.16%
Georgia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.16%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.16%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 3, 0.16%
Fiji
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 3, 0.16%
Ethiopia
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 2, 0.1%
Bolivia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.1%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.1%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 2, 0.1%
Malawi
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.1%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.1%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.1%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.1%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.05%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.05%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.05%
Albania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.05%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.05%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.05%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.05%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.05%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.05%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.05%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.05%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.05%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.05%
Laos
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.05%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.05%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 1, 0.05%
New Caledonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.05%
UAE
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 1, 0.05%
Papua New Guinea
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.05%
Peru
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.05%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.05%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.05%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.05%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.05%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.05%
Syria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Tajikistan
|
Tajikistan, 1, 0.05%
Tajikistan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Micronesia
|
Micronesia, 1, 0.05%
Micronesia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.05%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.05%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.05%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (61 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 59, 25.65%
USA
59 publications, 25.65%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 41, 17.83%
Germany
41 publications, 17.83%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 39, 16.96%
United Kingdom
39 publications, 16.96%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 35, 15.22%
Spain
35 publications, 15.22%
|
France
|
France, 30, 13.04%
France
30 publications, 13.04%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 23, 10%
Australia
23 publications, 10%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 16, 6.96%
Italy
16 publications, 6.96%
|
China
|
China, 14, 6.09%
China
14 publications, 6.09%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 11, 4.78%
Poland
11 publications, 4.78%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 10, 4.35%
Norway
10 publications, 4.35%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 3.48%
Russia
8 publications, 3.48%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 8, 3.48%
Portugal
8 publications, 3.48%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 8, 3.48%
Netherlands
8 publications, 3.48%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 3.48%
Switzerland
8 publications, 3.48%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 3.04%
Argentina
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 7, 3.04%
Belgium
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 7, 3.04%
Greece
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 7, 3.04%
Israel
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 3.04%
Mexico
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 7, 3.04%
Chile
7 publications, 3.04%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 6, 2.61%
Austria
6 publications, 2.61%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 2.61%
Brazil
6 publications, 2.61%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 2.17%
Turkey
5 publications, 2.17%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 1.74%
Iran
4 publications, 1.74%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 1.74%
South Africa
4 publications, 1.74%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 1.3%
Denmark
3 publications, 1.3%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 1.3%
Canada
3 publications, 1.3%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 1.3%
Romania
3 publications, 1.3%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 3, 1.3%
Uruguay
3 publications, 1.3%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 1.3%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 1.3%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.87%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.87%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.87%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.87%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.87%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.87%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.87%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.87%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.87%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.87%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.87%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.43%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.43%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.43%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.43%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.43%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.43%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.43%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.43%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.43%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.43%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.43%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.43%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.43%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.43%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.43%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.43%
Finland
1 publication, 0.43%
|
Show all (25 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
1 profile journal article
Kurbanov Redzhep

Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Lomonosov Moscow State University
112 publications,
525 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Dikarev Vasilii

Lomonosov Moscow State University
4 publications,
53 citations
h-index: 2
1 profile journal article
Vaccaro Carmela
🥼 🤝
University of Ferrara
126 publications,
1 638 citations
h-index: 23
1 profile journal article
Daw Tim
3 publications,
5 citations
h-index: 2