Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.6
SJR
0.346
CiteScore
3.4
Categories
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Economics and Econometrics
Areas
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Years of issue
2005-2025
journal names
Portuguese Economic Journal
PORT ECON J
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(320 citations)

Sustainability
(70 citations)

Portuguese Economic Journal
(55 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Lisbon
(27 publications)

University of Porto
(25 publications)

NOVA University Lisbon
(9 publications)

University of Lisbon
(9 publications)

University of Porto
(7 publications)

University of Valencia
(3 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2492
Q1

The Stochastic Dynamic Postdisaster Inventory Allocation Problem with Trucks and UAVs
van Steenbergen R.M., van Heeswijk W.J., Mes M.R.
Humanitarian logistics operations face increasing difficulties due to rising demands for aid in disaster areas. This paper investigates the dynamic allocation of scarce relief supplies across multiple affected districts over time. It introduces a novel stochastic dynamic postdisaster inventory allocation problem (SDPDIAP) with trucks and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) delivering relief goods under uncertain supply and demand. The relevance of this humanitarian logistics problem lies in the importance of considering the intertemporal social impact of deliveries. We achieve this by considering social costs (transportation and deprivation costs) when allocating scarce supplies. Furthermore, we consider the inherent uncertainties of disaster areas and the potential use of cargo UAVs to enhance operational efficiency. This study proposes two anticipatory solution methods based on approximate dynamic programming, specifically decomposed linear value function approximation (DL-VFA) and neural network value function approximation (NN-VFA) to effectively manage uncertainties in the dynamic allocation process. We compare DL-VFA and NN-VFA with various state-of-the-art methods (e.g., exact reoptimization and proximal policy optimization) and results show a 6%–8% improvement compared with the best benchmarks. NN-VFA provides the best performance and captures nonlinearities in the problem, whereas DL-VFA shows excellent scalability against a minor performance loss. From a practical standpoint, the experiments reveal that consideration of social costs results in improved allocation of scarce supplies both across affected districts and over time. Finally, results show that deploying UAVs can play a crucial role in the allocation of relief goods, especially in the first stages after a disaster. The use of UAVs reduces transportation and deprivation costs together by 16%–20% and reduces maximum deprivation times by 19%–40% while maintaining similar levels of demand coverage, showcasing efficient and effective operations. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023.
Q1

Solving the Real-Time Train Dispatching Problem by Column Generation
Schälicke M., Nachtigall K.
Disruptions in the operational flow of rail traffic can lead to conflicts between train movements, making it impossible to adhere to the scheduled timetable. This is when dispatching comes into play: resolving existing conflicts and providing a revised timetable. In this process, train paths are adjusted in their spatial and temporal dimensions. This adjustment is known as the train dispatching problem (TDP), which involves selecting conflict-free train paths with minimal delay. Starting from a path-oriented formulation of the TDP, a binary linear decision model is introduced. For each possible train path, a binary decision variable indicates whether the path is utilized by a train. Each train path is constructed from a set of predefined path segments within a time–space network. Instead of modeling pairwise conflicts, stronger linear programming formulations are achieved by defining cliques over the complete train paths. The combinatorial nature of the path segments results in a large number of possible paths, necessitating the use of the column-generation method. Within the subproblem, the shadow prices of conflict cliques must be considered. When constructing a new train path, it must be determined whether it belongs to a clique. This issue is addressed using a mixed integer program. The methodology is tested on instances from a dispatching area in Germany. Numerical results show that the presented method achieves acceptable computation times and good solution quality, meeting the requirements for real-time dispatching.
Q1

Estimating Erratic Measurement Errors in Network-Wide Traffic Flow via Virtual Balance Sensors
Zheng Z., Wang Z., Fu H., Ma W.
Large-scale traffic flow data are collected by numerous sensors for managing and operating transport systems. However, various measurement errors exist in the sensor data and their distributions or structures are usually not known in the real world, which diminishes the reliability of the collected data and impairs the performance of smart mobility applications. Such irregular error is referred to as the erratic measurement error and has not been well investigated in existing studies. In this research, we propose to estimate the erratic measurement errors in networked traffic flow data. Different from existing studies that mainly focus on measurement errors with known distributions or structures, we allow the distributions and structures of measurement errors to be unknown except that measurement errors occur based on a Poisson process. By exploiting the flow balance law, we first introduce the concept of virtual balance sensors and develop a mixed integer nonlinear programming model to simultaneously estimate sensor error probabilities and recover traffic flow. Under suitable assumptions, the complex integrated problem can be equivalently viewed as an estimate-then-optimize problem: first, estimation using machine learning (ML) methods, and then optimization with mathematical programming. When the assumptions fail in more realistic scenarios, we further develop a smart estimate-then-optimize (SEO) framework that embeds the optimization model into ML training loops to solve the problem. Compared with the two-stage method, the SEO framework ensures that the optimization process can recognize and compensate for inaccurate estimations caused by ML methods, which can produce more reliable results. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments using both synthetic and real-world examples under various scenarios. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our decomposition approach and the superiority of the SEO framework. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: The work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Project No. 72288101, 72101012, 72301023] and a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Grant Project No. PolyU/15206322]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0493 .
Q1

Exact Two-Step Benders Decomposition for the Time Window Assignment Traveling Salesperson Problem
Çelik Ş., Martin L., Schrotenboer A.H., Van Woensel T.
Next-day delivery logistics services are redefining the industry by increasingly focusing on customer service. Each logistics service provider’s challenge is jointly optimizing time window assignment and vehicle routing for such next-day delivery services. To do so in a cost-efficient and customer-centric fashion, real-life uncertainty, such as stochastic travel times, needs to be incorporated into the optimization process. This paper focuses on the canonical optimization problem within this context: the time window assignment traveling salesperson problem with stochastic travel times (TWATSP-ST). It belongs to two-stage, stochastic, mixed-integer programming problems with continuous recourse. We introduce two-step Benders decomposition with scenario clustering (TBDS) as an exact solution methodology for solving such stochastic programs. The method utilizes a new two-step decomposition along the binary and continuous first stage decisions and introduces a new scenario-retention strategy that combines and generalizes state-of-the-art Benders approaches and scenario-clustering techniques. Extensive experiments show that TBDS is superior to state-of-the-art approaches in the literature. It solves TWATSP-ST instances with up to 25 customers to optimality. It provides better lower and upper bounds that lead to faster convergence than existing state-of-the-art methods. We use TBDS to analyze the structure of the optimal solutions. By increasing routing costs only slightly, customer service can be improved tremendously driven by smartly alternating between high- and low-variance travel arcs to reduce the impact of delay propagation throughout the executed vehicle route. Funding: A. H. Schrotenboer has received support from the Dutch Science Foundation [Grant VI.Veni.211E.043]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0750 .
Q1

Modeling Metro Passenger Routing Choices with a Fully Differentiable End-to-End Simulation-Based Optimization (SBO) Approach
Du K., Lee E., Ma Q., Su Z., Zhang S., Lo H.K.
Metro systems in densely populated urban areas are often complicated, with some origin-destinations (OD) having multiple routes with similar travel times, leading to complex passenger routing behaviors. To improve modeling and calibration, this paper proposes a novel passenger route choice model with a metro simulator that accounts for passenger flows, queueing, congestion, and transfer delays. A novel, data-driven approach that utilizes a fully differentiable end-to-end simulation-based optimization (SBO) framework is proposed to calibrate the model, with the gradients calculated automatically and analytically using the iterative backpropagation (IB) algorithm. The SBO framework integrates data from multiple sources, including smart card data and train loadings, to calibrate the route choice parameters that best match the observed data. The full differentiability of the proposed framework enables it to calibrate for more than 20,000 passenger route choice ratios, covering every OD pair. To further improve the efficiency of the framework, a matrix-based optimization (MBO) mechanism is proposed, which provides better initial values for the SBO and ensures high efficiency with large datasets. A hybrid optimization algorithm combining MBO and SBO effectively calibrates the model, demonstrating high accuracy with synthetic data from actual passenger OD demands, where hypothesis tests are conducted for accuracies and significances. The accuracies and robustness are validated by experiments with synthetic passenger flow data, offering potential for optimizing passenger flow management in densely populated urban metro systems. Then, the SBO framework is extended for user equilibrium formulations with a crowding-aware route choice model and iterative metro simulations, calibrated by the hybrid optimization algorithm with additional matrix operations. Case studies with actual observed passenger flows are conducted to illustrate the proposed framework with multiple setups, exhibiting the heterogeneity of passenger route choice preferences and providing insights for operation management in the Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway system. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: This work was supported by the General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [Grant 16219224], the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [Grant 2023BAB076], and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72001162]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0557 .
Q1

2024 Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards
We are pleased to announce the recipients of the Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards. These awards recognize associate editors, special issue guest editors, and reviewers who have offered exceptional service in the review process. We truly appreciate all the efforts of the many volunteers who provide invaluable service to the journal. The 2024 recipients have distinguished themselves by the number of papers handled, their efficiency in handling papers, and the quality of their reviews.
Q1

Dynamic Robot Routing and Destination Assignment Policies for Robotic Sorting Systems
Fang Y., De Koster R., Roy D., Yu Y.
Robotic sorting systems (RSSs) use mobile robots to sort items by destination. An RSS pairs high accuracy and flexible capacity sorting with the advantages of a flexible layout. This is why several express parcel and e-commerce retail companies, who face heavy demand fluctuations, have implemented these systems. To cope with fluctuating demand, temporal robot congestion, and high sorting speed requirements, workload balancing strategies such as dynamic robot routing and destination reassignment may be of benefit. We investigate the effect of a dynamic robot routing policy using a Markov decision process (MDP) model and dynamic destination assignment using a mixed integer programming (MIP) model. To obtain the MDP model parameters, we first model the system as a semiopen queuing network (SOQN) that accounts for robot movement dynamics and network congestion. Then, we construct the MIP model to find a destination reassignment scheme that minimizes the workload imbalance. With inputs from the SOQN and MIP models, the Markov decision process minimizes parcel waiting and postponement costs and helps to find a good heuristic robot routing policy to reduce congestion. We show that the heuristic dynamic routing policy is near optimal in small-scale systems and outperforms benchmark policies in large-scale realistic scenarios. Dynamic destination reassignment also has positive effects on the throughput capacity in highly loaded systems. Together, in our case company, they improve the throughput capacity by 35%. Simultaneously, the effect of dynamic routing exceeds that of dynamic destination reassignment, suggesting that managers should focus more on dynamic robot routing than dynamic destination reassignment to mitigate temporal congestion. Funding: This work was supported by The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant WK2040000094] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71921001 and 72091215/72091210]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0458 .
Q1

Multimodal Transportation Pricing Alliance Design: Large-Scale Optimization for Rapid Gains
Cummings K., Vaze V., Ergun Ö., Barnhart C.
Transit agencies have the opportunity to outsource certain services to established mobility-on-demand (MOD) providers. Such alliances can improve service quality, coverage, and ridership; reduce public sector costs and vehicular emissions; and integrate the passenger experience. To amplify the effectiveness of such alliances, we develop a fare-setting model that jointly optimizes fares and discounts across a multimodal network. We capture commuters’ travel decisions with a discrete choice model, resulting in a large-scale, mixed-integer, nonconvex optimization problem. To solve this challenging problem, we develop a two-stage decomposition with the pricing decisions in the first stage and a mixed-integer linear optimization of fare discounts and passengers’ travel decisions in the second stage. To solve the decomposition, we develop a new solution approach that combines customized coordinate descent, parsimonious second-stage evaluations, and interpolations using special ordered sets. This approach, enhanced by acceleration techniques based on slanted traversal, randomization, and warm-start, significantly outperforms algorithmic benchmarks. Different alliance priorities result in qualitatively different fare designs: flat fares decrease the total vehicle-miles traveled, whereas geographically informed discounts improve passenger happiness. The model responds appropriately to equity-oriented and passenger-centric priorities, improving system utilization and lowering prices for low-income and long-distance commuters. Our profit allocation mechanism improves the outcomes for both types of operators, thus incentivizing profit-oriented MOD operators to adopt transit priorities. Funding: This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants 1122374 and 1750587]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0009 .
Q1

Designing the Liner Shipping Network of Tomorrow Powered by Alternative Fuels
Johansen M.L., Holst K.K., Ropke S.
The liner shipping industry is undergoing an extensive decarbonization process to reduce its 275 million tons of CO2 emissions as of 2018. In this process, the long-term solution is the introduction of new alternative maritime fuels. The introduction of alternative fuels presents a great set of unknowns. Among these are the strategic concerns regarding sourcing of alternative fuels and, operationally, how the new fuels might affect the network of shipping routes. We propose a problem formulation that integrates fuel supply/demand into the liner shipping network design problem. Here, we present a model to determine the production sites and distribution of new alternative fuels—we consider methanol and ammonia. For the network design problem, we apply an adaptive large neighborhood search combined with a delayed column generation process. In addition, we wish to test the effect of designing a robust network under uncertain demand conditions because of the problem’s strategic nature and importance. Therefore, our proposed solution method will have a deterministic and stochastic setup when we apply it to the second-largest multihub instance, WorldSmall, known from LINER-LIB. In the deterministic setting, our proposed solution method finds a new best solution to three instances from LINER-LIB. For the main considered WorldSmall instance, we even noticed a new best solution in all our tested fuel settings. In addition, we note a profit drop of 7.2% between a bunker-powered and pure alternative fuel–powered network. The selected alternative fuel production sites favor a proximity to European ports and have a heavy reliance on wind turbines. The stochastic results clearly showed that the found networks were much more resilient to the demand changes. Neglecting the perspective of uncertain demand leads to highly fluctuating profits. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0143 .
Q1

A Two-Stage Iteration Method for Solving the Departure Time Choice Problem
Guo R., Yang H., Huang H.
We discuss the numerical solution of the departure time choice problem. The non–quasi-monotone of the travel cost vector function is first proved to address the study motivation. A two-stage iteration method is then proposed to effectively solve the problem in a single origin-destination (OD) pair network with parallel links, in which departure time and route choices of commuters are involved. We analytically reveal why the iteration method can solve the problem and theoretically prove the convergence, that is, the iteration process finally achieves at a user equilibrium (UE) state. The iteration method is then extended to a single link network with heterogeneous users in the values of travel time and schedule delay and the preferred arrival time. Furthermore, numerical analyses are conducted for the two networks to demonstrate the effectiveness of the iteration method for solving the departure time choice problem. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72288101, 72171007, and 72021001]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0599 .
Q1

The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem with Ghost Kitchens
Neria G., Hildebrandt F.D., Tzur M., Ulmer M.W.
Restaurant meal delivery has been rapidly growing in the last few years. The main operational challenges are the temporally and spatially dispersed stochastic demand that arrives from customers all over town as well as the customers’ expectation of timely and fresh delivery. To overcome these challenges, a new business concept emerged: ghost kitchens. This concept proposes synchronized food preparation of several restaurants in a central facility. Ghost kitchens can bring several advantages, such as fresher food because of the synchronization of food preparation and delivery and less delay because of the consolidated delivery of orders. Exploiting these advantages requires effective operational strategies for the dynamic scheduling of food preparation and delivery. The goal of this paper is providing these strategies and investigating the value of ghost kitchens. We model the problem as a sequential decision process. For the complex decision space of scheduling order preparations, consolidating orders to trips, and scheduling trip departures, we propose a large neighborhood search (LNS) procedure based on partial decisions and driven by analytical properties. Within the LNS, decisions are evaluated via a value function approximation, enabling anticipatory and real-time decision making. In a comprehensive computational study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method compared with benchmark policies and highlight the advantages of ghost kitchens compared with conventional meal delivery. Funding: G. Neria’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center, the Council for Higher Education in Israel, and the Shlomo Shmeltzer Institute for Smart Transportation at Tel Aviv University. F. D. Hildebrandt’s research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) German Research Foundation [Grant 413322447]. M. Tzur’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center. M. W. Ulmer’s work is funded by the DFG Emmy Noether Programme [Grant 444657906]. We gratefully acknowledge their support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0510 .
Q1

Multiday User Equilibrium with Strategic Commuters
Wu M., Yin Y., Lynch J.P.
In the era of connected and automated mobility, commuters possess strong computation power, enabling them to strategically make sequential travel choices over a planning horizon. This paper investigates the multiday traffic patterns that arise from such decision-making behavior. In doing so, we frame the commute problem as a mean-field Markov game and introduce a novel concept of multiday user equilibrium to capture the steady state of commuters’ interactions. The proposed model is general and can be tailored to various travel choices, such as route or departure time. We explore a range of properties of the multiday user equilibrium under mild conditions. The study reveals the fingerprint of user inertia on network flow patterns, causing between-day variations even at a steady state. Furthermore, our analysis establishes critical connections between the multiday user equilibrium and conventional Wardrop equilibrium. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI-1854684, CMMI-1904575, CMMI-2233057, and CMMI-2240981]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0488 .
Q1

On the Concept of Opportunity Cost in Integrated Demand Management and Vehicle Routing
Fleckenstein D., Klein R., Klein V., Steinhardt C.
Integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems are characterized by a stream of customers arriving dynamically over a booking horizon and requesting logistical services, fulfilled by a given fleet of vehicles during a service horizon. Prominent examples are attended home delivery and same-day delivery problems, where customers commonly have heterogeneous preferences regarding service fulfillment and requests differ in profitability. Thus, demand management methods are applied to steer the booking process to maximize total profit considering the cost of the routing decisions for the resulting orders. To measure the requests’ profitability for any demand management method, it is common to estimate their opportunity cost. In the context of integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems, this estimation differs substantially from the estimation in the well-examined demand management problems of traditional revenue management applications as, for example, found in the airline or car rental industry. This is because of the unique interrelation of demand control decisions and vehicle routing decisions as it inhibits a clear quantification and attribution of cost, and of displaced revenue, to certain customer requests. In this paper, we extend the theoretical foundation of opportunity cost in integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems. By defining and analyzing a generic Markov decision process model, we formally derive a definition of opportunity cost and prove opportunity cost properties on a general level. Hence, our findings are valid for a wide range of specific problems. Further, based on these theoretical findings, we propose approximation approaches that have not yet been applied in the existing literature, and evaluate their potential in a computational study. Thereby, we provide evidence that the theoretical results can be practically exploited in the development of solution algorithms. Funding: This work was supported by the University of the Bundeswehr Munich. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0644 .
Q1

A 0,1 Linear Programming Approach to Deadlock Detection and Management in Railways
Dal Sasso V., Lamorgese L., Mannino C., Onofri A., Ventura P.
In railway systems, a deadlock occurs when trains accidentally occupy positions that prevent each other from moving forward. Although deadlocks are rare events, they do occur from time to time, requiring costly recourse actions and generating significant knock-on delays. In this paper, we present a noncompact 0,1 linear programming formulation and a methodology for discovering (possibly future) deadlocks and the subsequent implementation of optimal recovery measures. The approach is implemented in a tool to dispatch trains in real time developed in cooperation with Union Pacific (UP) and currently in operations on the entire UP network. Funding: This work was partially funded by Europe’s Rail, Flagship Project MOTIONAL [Action Horizon JU Innovation, Project 101101973]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0521 .
Q1

Pricing and Demand Management for Integrated Same-Day and Next-Day Delivery Systems
Banerjee D., Erera A.L., Toriello A.
We study a system in which a common delivery fleet provides service to both same-day delivery (SDD) and next-day delivery (NDD) orders placed by e-retail customers who are sensitive to delivery prices. We develop a model of the system and optimize with respect to two separate objectives. First, empirical research suggests that fulfilling e-retail orders ahead of promised delivery days increases a firm’s long-run market share. Motivated by this phenomenon, we optimize for customer satisfaction by maximizing the quantity of NDD orders fulfilled one day early given fixed prices. Next, we optimize for total profit; we optimize for a single SDD price, and we then set SDD prices in a two-level scheme with discounts for early-ordering customers. Our analysis relies on continuous approximation techniques to capture the interplay between NDD and SDD orders and particularly the effect one day’s operations have on the next, a novel modeling component not present in SDD-only models; a key technical result is establishing the model’s convergence to a steady state using dynamical systems theory. We derive structural insights and efficient algorithms for both objectives. In particular, we show that, under certain conditions, the total profit is a piecewise-convex function with polynomially many breakpoints that can be efficiently enumerated. In a case study set in metropolitan Denver, Colorado, approximately 10% of NDD orders can be fulfilled one day early at optimality, and profit is increased by 1% to 3% in a two-level pricing scheme versus a one-level scheme. We conduct operational simulations for validation of solutions and analysis of initial conditions. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant DGE-1650044]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0381 .
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
320 citations, 8.71%
|
|
Sustainability
70 citations, 1.9%
|
|
Portuguese Economic Journal
55 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Economic Modelling
49 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Applied Economics
37 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Empirical Economics
34 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
32 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
24 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Research in International Business and Finance
24 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Tourism Economics
22 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Cogent Economics and Finance
22 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Labour Economics
19 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
19 citations, 0.52%
|
|
World Development
19 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
18 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Energy Policy
15 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Resources Policy
15 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Banking and Finance
15 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of International Trade and Economic Development
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Energy Economics
13 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
13 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Small Business Economics
13 citations, 0.35%
|
|
PLoS ONE
13 citations, 0.35%
|
|
IMF Working Paper
13 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Economics/ Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie
12 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Finance and Economics
12 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Applied Econometrics
12 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Economics Letters
12 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Econometrics
11 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
11 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Economies
11 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Review of Economics and Finance
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Industrial and Corporate Change
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
North American Journal of Economics and Finance
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Review of World Economics
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Environmental and Resource Economics
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Review of Financial Analysis
10 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Economic Studies
9 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SAGE Open
9 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Comparative Economics
9 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Economics and Economic Policy
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
World Economy
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Economic Surveys
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of International Economics
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Macroeconomics
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Development Economics
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Mathematics
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Economic Change and Restructuring
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Applied Economics Letters
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Heliyon
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Economics and Human Biology
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Research Policy
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Handbook of Research on In-Country Determinants and Implications of Foreign Land Acquisitions
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Regional Studies
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Energy and Environment
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Review of Economics and Statistics
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ecological Economics
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Singapore Economic Review
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Tourism Management
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Annals of Regional Science
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Australian Economic Papers
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Urban Economics
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economic Development and Cultural Change
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economic Analysis and Policy
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Development Studies
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Health Economics (United Kingdom)
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Open Economies Review
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Manchester School
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Empirica
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Cambridge Journal of Economics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Social Economics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Applied Economics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SN Business & Economics
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Papers in Regional Science
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Managerial Finance
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Risks
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Labour
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Political Economy
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Elsevier
846 citations, 23.01%
|
|
Springer Nature
604 citations, 16.43%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
384 citations, 10.45%
|
|
Wiley
360 citations, 9.79%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
313 citations, 8.51%
|
|
Emerald
193 citations, 5.25%
|
|
MDPI
167 citations, 4.54%
|
|
SAGE
126 citations, 3.43%
|
|
Oxford University Press
96 citations, 2.61%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
60 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
36 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
26 citations, 0.71%
|
|
World Scientific
25 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
21 citations, 0.57%
|
|
IGI Global
16 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Economic Association
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Monetary Fund
14 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
12 citations, 0.33%
|
|
MIT Press
11 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
11 citations, 0.3%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
8 citations, 0.22%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
7 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SciELO
6 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Kiel Institute for the World Economy
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
CAIRN
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Vysoka Skola Ekonomicka
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Intellect
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academy of Management
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bureau for Economic Research
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AOSIS
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
2 citations, 0.05%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Duke University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Instituto de Pesquisas Economicas
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Real Estate Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Universidad De Antioquia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Cornell University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
International Association for Energy Economics
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Estatistica
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ministere du Travail et de la Participation
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Savez Ekonomista Vojvodine
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Center of Biomass and Renewable Energy Scientia Academy
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
DMSP Research Center, Paris-Dauphine University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Science Alert
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
PERSEE Program
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
FSBEI HE Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Publishing House Finance and Credit
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
OpenEdition
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Documentation Centre (EKT)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Econometric Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Duncker & Humblot GmbH
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Statistical Society
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Polskie Towarzystwo Statystyczne
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (65 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
University of Lisbon
27 publications, 8.74%
|
|
University of Porto
25 publications, 8.09%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
9 publications, 2.91%
|
|
University of Coimbra
7 publications, 2.27%
|
|
William & Mary
7 publications, 2.27%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
5 publications, 1.62%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
5 publications, 1.62%
|
|
University of Valencia
5 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Imperial College London
4 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University College London
4 publications, 1.29%
|
|
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
4 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Universidade dos Açores
4 publications, 1.29%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Kyoto University
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Barcelona
3 publications, 0.97%
|
|
South Ural State University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Lahore
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Istanbul Gelisim University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Gebze Technical University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Cyprus International University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Ocean University of China
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National Formosa University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Siena
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
George Washington University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Ahmadu Bello University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
New York University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Osaka University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kansas State University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Salamanca
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Poznań University of Economics and Business
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kozminski University
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Warsaw
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of East Anglia
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Santiago de Compostela
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of A Coruña
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Université de Lille
2 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Cukurova University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Fatima Jinnah Women University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Government College University, Lahore
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Forman Christian College
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Suleyman Demirel University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Atilim University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Ton Duc Thang University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Thai Nguyen University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
National Economics University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Beihang University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Aksaray University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Piri Reis University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Istanbul Commerce University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
North China University of Technology
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Hubei University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Nankai University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Chongqing Technology and Business University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Parthenope University of Naples
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
South China Normal University
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Fribourg
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of International Business and Economics
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
University of Lisbon
9 publications, 9.18%
|
|
University of Porto
7 publications, 7.14%
|
|
University of Valencia
3 publications, 3.06%
|
|
South Ural State University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of Lahore
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Istanbul Gelisim University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Cyprus International University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Ahmadu Bello University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
Osaka University
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
2 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Cukurova University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Gebze Technical University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Government College University, Lahore
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Suleyman Demirel University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Atilim University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Thai Nguyen University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Aksaray University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Piri Reis University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Istanbul Commerce University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
North China University of Technology
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Hubei University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Nankai University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
South China Normal University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Hunan Normal University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Fribourg
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Milano-Bicocca
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Bern University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Jiangsu University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong–Liverpool University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
National Taitung University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Harbin University of Commerce
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Northeast Agricultural University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Nicosia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Qingdao University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Anhui University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Glasgow
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
School for Advanced Studies Lucca
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Federal University Dutse
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Kim Il Sung University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Shandong University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Panteion University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Public University of Navarre
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Pablo de Olavide University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Federal University of Uberlândia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Bielefeld University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Modul University Vienna
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Kansas State University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Coimbra
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Reading
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Sussex
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Belgrade
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of A Coruña
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Deusto
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Texas A&M University – Commerce
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Bahir Dar University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Surrey
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Bournemouth University
1 publication, 1.02%
|
|
Show all (60 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 115, 37.22%
Portugal
115 publications, 37.22%
|
USA
|
USA, 41, 13.27%
USA
41 publications, 13.27%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 36, 11.65%
Spain
36 publications, 11.65%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 33, 10.68%
United Kingdom
33 publications, 10.68%
|
China
|
China, 27, 8.74%
China
27 publications, 8.74%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 19, 6.15%
Germany
19 publications, 6.15%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 15, 4.85%
Italy
15 publications, 4.85%
|
France
|
France, 14, 4.53%
France
14 publications, 4.53%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 9, 2.91%
Pakistan
9 publications, 2.91%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 2.59%
Turkey
8 publications, 2.59%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 7, 2.27%
Netherlands
7 publications, 2.27%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 2.27%
Poland
7 publications, 2.27%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 1.94%
Japan
6 publications, 1.94%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 5, 1.62%
Nigeria
5 publications, 1.62%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 1.29%
Belgium
4 publications, 1.29%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 1.29%
Canada
4 publications, 1.29%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 1.29%
Malaysia
4 publications, 1.29%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.97%
Russia
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.97%
Austria
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.97%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.97%
Greece
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.97%
Norway
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.97%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.97%
Finland
3 publications, 0.97%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.65%
Australia
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.65%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.65%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.65%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.65%
Chile
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.65%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.65%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.65%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.32%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.32%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.32%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.32%
India
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Cape Verde
|
Cape Verde, 1, 0.32%
Cape Verde
1 publication, 0.32%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 1, 0.32%
North Korea
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.32%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.32%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.32%
Peru
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.32%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.32%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.32%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.32%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.32%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.32%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 26, 26.53%
Portugal
26 publications, 26.53%
|
China
|
China, 17, 17.35%
China
17 publications, 17.35%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 11, 11.22%
Spain
11 publications, 11.22%
|
USA
|
USA, 7, 7.14%
USA
7 publications, 7.14%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 7, 7.14%
Turkey
7 publications, 7.14%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 6.12%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 6.12%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 5.1%
Pakistan
5 publications, 5.1%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 4.08%
Italy
4 publications, 4.08%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 4.08%
Nigeria
4 publications, 4.08%
|
France
|
France, 3, 3.06%
France
3 publications, 3.06%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 3.06%
Malaysia
3 publications, 3.06%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 3.06%
Japan
3 publications, 3.06%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 2.04%
Russia
2 publications, 2.04%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 2.04%
Germany
2 publications, 2.04%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 2.04%
Belgium
2 publications, 2.04%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 2.04%
Serbia
2 publications, 2.04%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 1.02%
Austria
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 1.02%
Brazil
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 1.02%
Vietnam
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 1.02%
Ghana
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 1.02%
Greece
1 publication, 1.02%
|
India
|
India, 1, 1.02%
India
1 publication, 1.02%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 1, 1.02%
North Korea
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 1.02%
Netherlands
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 1.02%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 1.02%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 1.02%
Finland
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 1.02%
Switzerland
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 1.02%
Sweden
1 publication, 1.02%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 1.02%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 1.02%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
1 profile journal article
Moreira António
227 publications,
2 432 citations
h-index: 26
1 profile journal article
Pereira Nuno
1 publication
h-index: 0