Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
10.9
SJR
3.352
CiteScore
24.1
Categories
Development
Strategy and Management
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Transportation
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1982-2025
journal names
Tourism Management
TOURISM MANAGE
Top-3 citing journals

Tourism Management
(20415 citations)

Sustainability
(17366 citations)

Current Issues in Tourism
(10111 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(280 publications)

University of Surrey
(145 publications)

Griffith University
(111 publications)

Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(93 publications)

University of Surrey
(39 publications)

Sun Yat-sen University
(37 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 3032
Q1

Revealing the mechanisms of adopting innovative on-site industrialized construction technology: an integrated SEM-ISM method
Liu X., Li Z., Ma S., Meng Q., Zheng R.
PurposeOn-site industrialized construction (OIC) represents a significant innovation direction for the industrial transformation of the construction industry. However, compared to prefabricated construction (PC) technology, OIC technology has not received sufficient attention. In particular, the lack of mechanisms for the adoption of OIC technology has significantly hindered the innovation and diffusion of this technology. This paper aims to address this gap by identifying the drivers and barriers of OIC technology and exploring the logical relationships among these influencing factors.Design/methodology/approachTherefore, this study aims to analyze the factors influencing OIC technology adoption, focusing on both drivers and barriers, to promote its adoption among construction companies. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is employed to validate the significance of influencing factors, while interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is utilized to explore the interrelationships among the factors supported by PLS-SEM.FindingsThe results of PLS-SEM show that relative advantage, regulatory support, top management support, organizational readiness and market demand positively influence adoption intention, while perceived risk, complexity and cost have a negative impact. Additionally, the root driver identified by ISM analysis is labor shortage, and the root barrier is comprehension presents challenges. It is noteworthy that the root driver is derived from market demand, but the low path coefficient for market demand in PLS-SEM indicates limited direct effects. This suggests that market demand influences adoption intention by driving other mediating factors, which still require sufficient attention.Originality/valueThis study elucidates the factors and mechanisms influencing the adoption of OIC technology, supplementing the knowledge base in the domains of industrialized construction (IC) and engineering technological innovation. Additionally, it offers valuable insights for construction companies actively engaged in construction industrialization reform, facilitating the effective promotion of OIC technology.
Q1

Improving CSR performance of food processing firms with operational risks: does digital investment matter?
Ouyang Y., Ye F., Li Y.
PurposeCorporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a prominent public concern; however, within the agricultural sector, many firms demonstrate unsatisfactory performance in terms of CSR activities. Drawing upon the behavioral theory of the firm, this study aims to investigate how operational risks faced by agriculture-related firms affect its CSR practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a data of 136 Chinese food processing firms with 909 observations from 2011 to 2021, this study constructs the fixed-effect model to analyze the relationship among operational risks, digital investment and CSR practices.FindingsThe empirical evidence shows that competition risk significantly improves CSR performance while financial risk hinders it. The results of moderation analysis further reveal that digital investment strengthens the positive effect of competition risk and the negative effect of financial risk, although the latter is not statistically significant.Originality/valueOverall, by establishing a link between operational risks and CSR practices, this study contributes to clarifying decision-making rules for food processing firms and deepening the understanding of why and when they adopt social responsibility initiatives.
Q1

Is digitalization a double-edged sword for innovation? A buyer–supplier dyad
Yang W., Song Z., Zhou Y., Cheng L.
PurposeDigitalization presents both opportunities and challenges for collaborative innovation within supply chains (SCs). Based on resource dependence theory (RDT), this study examines the underlying mechanisms of digitalization and innovation performance, elucidating the mediation and moderating role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms in the above relationships.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical regression analysis is used to test the model from 170 buyer–supplier dyads in China.FindingsThis study’s empirical findings demonstrate that digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with innovation performance in buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs), and interfirm IT integration partially mediates this relationship. Specifically, digitalization has an inverted U-shaped relationship with interfirm IT integration, and interfirm IT integration positively affects innovation performance. Finally, relational norms moderate this inverted U-shaped relationship, making it steeper.Originality/valueThis study embeds the impact of digitalization on innovation performance within SC relationships. By using the buyer–supplier dyad as the analysis unit, the study reveals that digitalization brings both benefits and risks to innovation performance in BSRs. Furthermore, by clarifying the role of interfirm IT integration and relational norms, the study uncovers the mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions in this relationship, thereby enriching the understanding of SC digitalization.
Q1

Examining the nexus: supply chain quality management, knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and strategic business performance
Lim A., Ooi K., Lee V., Tan G.W., Sohal A.
PurposeManufacturers face many challenges in continual innovation and strategical adaptation to environmental changes. Businesses must embrace evolved management theory while implementing a robust supply chain quality management (SCQM) strategy for a sustainable supply chain (SDG12). However, there is a dearth of awareness in applying knowledge-based dynamic capability (KBDC) in SCQM. Furthermore, knowledge sharing, an important component of KBDC, has received less attention when assessing organizational innovation and strategic business performance (SBP). Hence, our study aims to identify the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP by applying the KBDC theory.Design/methodology/approachWe empirically tested 204 valid questionnaire responses received from Malaysian manufacturers using a deep partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) analysis.FindingsOur study reveals that SCQM practices have a significant direct impact on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. Furthermore, our research indicates that knowledge sharing mediates (partially complementary mediation) the association between SCQM practices and organizational innovation but not SCQM practices and SBP.Originality/valueOur study contributes to the KBDC theory by illustrating the significance of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP. The study findings provide a greater understanding of the impact of SCQM practices on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation and SBP, thereby shedding light on the importance of practices related to human capital development and integration that manufacturers should consider when designing a SCQM system. The study shall assist the manufacturers in achieving a sustainable supply chain (SDG 12).
Q1

The role of IT governance and organizational agility in enhancing firm performance: a study of Asian and Latin American firms
Yoshikuni A.C., Dwivedi R., Kamal M.M., Fosso Wamba S., Dwivedi P.
PurposeThe role of information technology governance (ITG) is crucial to enable organizational agility (OA) to leverage firm performance (FP). ITG capability helps firms optimize market and operational activities and improves corporate performance. Therefore, the paper aims to examine the relationship between ITG’s capability to emerge AO and leverage FP in developing economies.Design/methodology/approachThis research is conducted in an empirical setting comprising a quantitative cross-country survey based on a sample of 433 enterprises from Asia (AS) and Latin America (LA) regions.FindingsThe outcome of the research demonstrates the significant impact of ITG capability on OA to achieve FP. The results further indicate that ITG capability plays a vital role in the FP through operational adjustment agility than market capitalizing agility in AS than LA organizations.Practical implicationsThe empirical study demonstrates that managers must better understand how ITG capability was composed through IT strategy, IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge and IT management to influence OA to gain FP independently of the region.Originality/valueThe findings offer valuable insights for academics and practitioners into ITG capability, appropriate IT architecture, IT infrastructure, IT business knowledge, IT management and IT strategy to reach dynamic capability in organizational agility to enhance FP in developing economies.
Q1

Balanced social media engagement and firm performance in consumer goods industry
Shu S., Zhang H.
PurposeThis paper investigates the spillover effect of firms’ social media engagement with investors on consumption market performance and examines the impact of balanced/imbalanced social media stakeholder engagement strategies on firms’ consumption market performance.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs multi-source secondary data covering 3,856 quarterly observations of 188 firms in the Chinese retail industry over six years (2015–2020). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology are used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe study reveals that firms’ social media engagement with investors has a positive spillover effect on consumption market performance. Additionally, the authors find that a balanced social media engagement strategy, which allocates resources evenly between consumers and investors, is more likely to optimize firm performance than an imbalanced strategy.Originality/valueThe research reveals cross-stakeholder spillover effects of social media engagement, introduces balanced/imbalanced engagement strategy concepts and extends the balanced marketing perspective to the social media context, providing guidance for firms to optimize their social media strategies.
Q1

Timing and interdependencies in blockchain capabilities development for supply chain management: a resource-based view perspective
Lima B., Ganga G.M., Godinho Filho M., De Santa-Eulalia L.A., Thürer M., Queiroz M.M., Moraes K.K.
PurposeUsing the resource-based view (RBV), our study aims to provide theoretical and empirical insights into blockchain capabilities’ (BCs) compounded and sequential effects on supply chain competitive advantages (CA).Design/methodology/approachWe combined a systematic literature review and an expert interview. Interpretive Structural Modelling and a Matrix of Cross-Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification were used to determine the relationship between the capabilities. Simple Additive Weighting assessed each capability’s relative importance and impact.FindingsWe reveal a sequential development path for BCs. Foundational capabilities, such as cybersecurity, provide immediate performance benefits, establishing a unique, valuable and inimitable resource. As firms progress to advanced capabilities, the compounded value of these capabilities generates a stronger, dynamic resource for sustained CA. Moreover, the study underscores the strategic importance of timing in adopting and developing BCs, as early adoption can secure a competitive edge difficult for later entrants to replicate.Practical implicationsOur proposed framework guides managers in incorporating blockchain technology into supply chain management (SCM) processes once it demonstrates that firms can enhance their CA by prioritizing the technical basics BC, leveraging the informational capabilities in level two and enabling effective problem-solving through level three. Our framework also shows that a learning process occurs as BCs are used and their results are explored.Originality/valueOur study extends the RBV by demonstrating BCs’ cumulative and interdependent nature in SCM. It emphasizes the synergistic interactions between these capabilities, which collectively enhance CA.
Q1

A dual adversarial structure of generative adversarial network for nature language generation
Sue K., Chen Y.
PurposeRecently, due to the practicability in several domains, generative adversarial network (GAN) has successfully been adopted in the field of natural language generation (NLG). The purpose of this paper focuses on improving the quality of text and generating sequences similar to human writing for several real applications.Design/methodology/approachA novel model, GAN2, is developed based on a GAN with dual adversarial architecture. We train the generator by an internal discriminator with a beam search technique to improve the quality of generated sequences. Then, we enhance the generator with an external discriminator to optimize and strengthen the learning process of sequence generation.FindingsThe proposed GAN2 model could be utilized in widespread applications, such as chatbots, machine translation and image description. By the proposed dual adversarial structure, we significantly improve the quality of the generated text. The average and top-1 metrics, such as NLL, BLEU and ROUGE, are used to measure the generated sentences from the GAN2 model over all baselines. Several experiments are conducted to demonstrate the performance and superiority of the proposed model compared with the state-of-the-art methods on numerous evaluation metrics.Originality/valueGenerally, reward sparsity and mode collapse are two main challenging issues when adopt GAN to real NLG applications. In this study, GAN2 exploits a dual adversarial architecture which facilitates the learning process in the early training stage for solving the problem of reward sparsity. The occurrence of mode collapse also could be reduced in the later training stage with the introduced comparative discriminator by avoiding high rewards for training in a specific mode. Furthermore, the proposed model is applied to several synthetic and real datasets to show the practicability and exhibit great generalization with all discussed metrics.
Q1

Critical factors for green supply chain management implementation in footwear industry
Pai F., Yeh T., Chen Y.
PurposeThe study aims to investigate the implementation of green supply chain management (GSCM) in the footwear industry. It focuses on identifying key factors (dimensions and corresponding sub-dimensions) that promote GSCM and examines the importance and relevance of these factors in improving sustainability and competitive advantage within the footwear manufacturing supply chain.Design/methodology/approachA literature review and expert interviews were conducted to identify the factors for GSCM in the footwear industry. The DEMATEL-based ANP (DANP) method was used to analyze the importance and interrelationships of the identified dimensions and sub-dimensions. The data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed across different levels of the supply chain to compare the significant factors affecting GSCM implementation.FindingsThe study reveals that green purchasing is the core dimension, playing a critical role in the footwear industry. Organizational and environmental management emerges as the most influential causal factors, strongly correlated with other factors. However, as to sub-dimensions, different level of supply chain members should focus on different sub-dimensions.Originality/valueThis research provides valuable insights into the key dimensions and sub-dimensions and their causal relationships in the footwear industry. It offers practical suggestions for manufacturers to prioritize organizational and environmental management as a strategic approach to maximize the benefits of GSCM.
Q1

A model for selecting supply chain collaboration paradigms: the impact of intelligent manufacturing models
Hou K., Niu Z., Zhang Y.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore how to select a suitable supply chain collaboration paradigm (SCCP) based on the intelligent manufacturing model (IMM) of enterprises.Design/methodology/approachGiven the fit between internal collaboration and external collaboration, we propose a model to select a suitable SCCP based on two-sided matching between SCCPs and IMMs. In this decision problem, we invited five university scholars and seven related consultants to evaluate SCCPs and IMMs based on the regret theory, which is used to obtain the perceived utility and matching results. The evaluation values are comfortably expressed through probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). Also, we set the lowest acceptance threshold to improve the accuracy of matching results.FindingsThe findings indicate that the characteristics of IMMs can significantly influence the selection of SCCPs, and an SCCP is not suitable for all IMMs. Interestingly, the study findings suggest that the selection of SCCP is diverse and multi-optional under the constraints of IMMs.Originality/valueExisting studies have explored supply chain collaboration (SCC) in Industry 4.0 to improve supply chain performance, but less attention has been paid to the impact of the match between SCCPs and IMMs on supply chain performance. And even fewer studies have addressed how to select a suitable SCCP in different IMMs. This study provides a unique contribution to the practice of SCC and expands the understanding of supply chain management in Industry 4.0.
Q1

Effective strategies in short video advertising: leveraging influencer endorsements and discounts
Yuan L., Shi Y., Xia H., Ye Q.
PurposeThis paper aims to examine how the number of short videos posted and the number of influencers employed, two important strategies in short video marketing, affect consumer behavior and how price discounts moderate the effects of influencer endorsement on consumer browsing and purchasing behavior.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the literature on influencer endorsement, this study used an ordinary least square model to empirically examine the two effects of endorsement strategies in increasing product traffic and sales for consumers at a short video app, Douyin (TikTok).FindingsThe results show that the number of short video ads produces the classic inverted U-shape for traffic and sales, and both effects were strengthened under a high discount condition. Whereas the number of influencers has a positive effect on traffic but produces an inverted U-shape for sales, both effects were undermined under a high discount condition.Originality/valueThis study is the first to explore the two distinct effects (repetition effect and diffusion effect) of influencer endorsement on browsing and purchasing behavior and theorize about the moderate effects of discounts on these effects.
Q1

Leveraging platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns in E-commerce: an affordance actualization perspective
Zhou Y., Li H., Yin P.
PurposeThis study investigates how online sellers can leverage platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns through the lens of affordance actualization theory. We conceptualize four categories of platform-based technologies and theorize how their affordances influence consumer perceptions and behaviors, leading to reduced return rates.Design/methodology/approachWe develop a research model grounded in affordance actualization theory and test our hypotheses using a unique longitudinal dataset from a leading e-commerce platform. We employ panel data analysis with seller fixed effects and conduct various robustness checks to ensure the reliability of our findings. We also examine the synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies and explore their varying impacts across product types and seller characteristics.FindingsThe strategic actualization of pricing, marketing, product presentation and customer service technology affordances significantly reduces product return rates. The return-mitigating effects are stronger for low-reputation sellers and high-price, high-complexity products, highlighting the contingent value of technology affordances in managing returns. Besides, we find evidence of synergistic effects among different platform-based technologies, particularly for complex products and less reputable sellers.Originality/valueThis study extends affordance actualization theory to the e-commerce context and uncovers the mechanisms and boundary conditions for platform-based technologies to mitigate product returns. We contribute to the literature by offering a novel theoretical perspective and granular insights into the role of technology in shaping a critical operational outcome in online retailing.
Q1

Will rural collective construction land marketization affect pension industry? A mixed-methods investigation
Han L., Wu H., Fang B., Zhou W.
PurposeThis paper aims to study whether rural collective construction land marketization (RCCLM) affects pension industry and analyze its impact mechanism.Design/methodology/approachBased on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and social cognition theory (SCT), this paper constructs a theoretical framework for the purchase behavior of rural retirement housing with the influence of RCCLM. A mixed-methods investigation combining qualitative and quantitative study is adopted in this paper.FindingsThe research results indicate that the purchase intention of rural retirement housing has a significant positive impact on the purchase behavior. However, RCCLM has a significant negative impact on the purchase intention of rural retirement housing. A logical framework of “land system participant behavior” has been constructed from three main bodies: government, developers and elderly urban and rural residents.Practical implicationsThis paper provides suggestions for the three entities from the perspectives of macro, medium and micro-level to improve transaction system for rural collective construction land use right (TSRCCLUR), providing references for the collective construction land marketization policy and the development of the pension industry.Originality/valueThis paper deepens the study of behavior intention in planned behavior, enriches TPB model in the study of rural retirement housing security and clarifies the influence mechanism of the rural retirement housing purchase intention with the theoretical and empirical test of the model.
Q1

Supply chain resilience and soft organizational factors – a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review
Ahmed Q., Sumbal M.S., Lee C., Tsui E.
PurposeThe advent of a dynamic and uncertain environment has shifted organizational focus from reactive to proactive approaches to develop resilience against disruptions. Organizations can strengthen their supply chain networks through strategic changes in structure and processes. In this connection, this study explores the extant literature on supply chain resilience (SCRE) concerning soft organizational factors (leadership, organizational culture and knowledge management) to analyse recent trends in this domain and propose future research directions.Design/methodology/approachIt is a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of research articles from 2004 to 2024, collected from ISI Web of Science with keywords searches such as “knowledge management and supply chain resilience,” “leadership and supply chain resilience” and “organizational culture and supply chain resilience.” “VOS viewer” and “ATLAS.ti” were utilized for the co-occurrence and co-authorship analysis of the articles along with focusing on aspects such as theoretical and practical implications, the collaboration institutions and the countries involved in relation to the topic of interest.FindingsThe review shows that the development of studies on SCRE was slow from 2004 to 2015 but grew significantly from 2015 onwards and rose exponentially after 2020. Most studies were published in 2023. Results reveal the development of proactive strategies for SCRE in the recent literature by focusing on organizational factors. The study highlights exploring the contextual interplay between environmental, social and governance (ESG) and soft organizational factors for mitigation of supply chain risk and resilience in large-scale projects.Originality/valueThe COVID-19 pandemic became the precursor to highlighting the antecedents of SCRE, but the study of soft organizational drivers is still an ongoing area of research. There is a need to map the nascent literature on the link between organizational soft drivers and SCRE.
Q1

Building organizational agility through digital transformation: a configurational approach in SMEs
Pelletier C., L'Écuyer F., Raymond L.
PurposeThis study adopts a capability-based view to investigate the attainment of organizational agility in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It first explores how these firms mobilize different types of operational and dynamic information technology (IT) capabilities to achieve a high level of agility through their digital transformation. In return, it also reveals opposite paths, i.e. those leading to its absence.Design/methodology/approachThe research method involves a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 65 Canadian manufacturing SMEs. Through necessity and sufficiency condition analysis procedures, this approach emphasizes the complexity of the digital transformation processes by revealing different sets (i.e. configurations) of what enable, or inhibit, organizational agility in these firms.FindingsThe findings indicate that manufacturing SMEs need to align at least one dynamic IT capability (sensing, learning, coordinating or integrating) and one operational IT capability (IT management, IT infrastructure or e-business) to be highly agile. In contrast, other findings indicate that there are suboptimal combinations of IT capabilities, which result in an absence of agility.Originality/valueThis study offers a deeper understanding of the complex interaction of IT capabilities in SMEs seeking greater agility in their business activities. Its contributions provide insights on the mobilization of a range of capabilities, both complementary and interdependent, to respond to changing conditions in their internal and external environments. These actionable findings can help various actors in the digital development of SMEs to design and implement effective IT strategies and public policies.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Tourism Management
20415 citations, 5.89%
|
|
Sustainability
17366 citations, 5.01%
|
|
Current Issues in Tourism
10111 citations, 2.92%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
8934 citations, 2.58%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
7045 citations, 2.03%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research
6911 citations, 1.99%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
6402 citations, 1.85%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
5965 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research
5890 citations, 1.7%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Research
5656 citations, 1.63%
|
|
Tourism Economics
5503 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
5346 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Journal of Destination Marketing and Management
5277 citations, 1.52%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
4915 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
4664 citations, 1.35%
|
|
Tourism Review
3222 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Hospitality and Tourism Management
3124 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Journal of Vacation Marketing
2931 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Tourism Recreation Research
2687 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Tourism Analysis
2147 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research
2143 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Anatolia
1961 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of China Tourism Research
1827 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism
1801 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
1763 citations, 0.51%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Cities
1761 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Tourism Geographies
1625 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
1570 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality Research
1557 citations, 0.45%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1470 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Tourism Planning and Development
1466 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
1386 citations, 0.4%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
1350 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Event Management
1300 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research
1245 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management
1204 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology
1154 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
1148 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Heritage Tourism
1100 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
1087 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
1023 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Land
1003 citations, 0.29%
|
|
PLoS ONE
811 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
800 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Air Transport Management
800 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SAGE Open
800 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
766 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change
756 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
755 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
721 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
705 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration
678 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Ecotourism
654 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Information Technology and Tourism
627 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
568 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events
567 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Sport and Tourism
565 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ocean and Coastal Management
565 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cornell Hospitality Quarterly
565 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
558 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Heliyon
554 citations, 0.16%
|
|
British Food Journal
546 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
504 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Tourism Social Science Series
495 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
459 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Convention and Event Tourism
428 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Tourism Futures
425 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
407 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
406 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Tourist Studies
397 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
388 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
367 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Tourism Review International
361 citations, 0.1%
|
|
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
343 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
339 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
339 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
333 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
313 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Tourism, Culture and Communication
312 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
309 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
308 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Leisure Studies
295 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
280 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism
262 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Place Management and Development
259 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Marine Policy
255 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Journal of Wine Business Research
244 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education
239 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Leisure Sciences
237 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Forests
236 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cities
236 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Tourism and Hospitality
231 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Land Use Policy
229 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Research in Transportation Business and Management
226 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights
225 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism
224 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Sustainable Development
211 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
206 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education
206 citations, 0.06%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
204 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
|
|
Elsevier
83011 citations, 23.96%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
72873 citations, 21.03%
|
|
Emerald
38814 citations, 11.2%
|
|
SAGE
28723 citations, 8.29%
|
|
MDPI
27652 citations, 7.98%
|
|
Springer Nature
24815 citations, 7.16%
|
|
Wiley
12597 citations, 3.64%
|
|
IGI Global
9079 citations, 2.62%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
6336 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3806 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3180 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1794 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1683 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1351 citations, 0.39%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1000 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
969 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
795 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
766 citations, 0.22%
|
|
EDP Sciences
748 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
705 citations, 0.2%
|
|
University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija
586 citations, 0.17%
|
|
OpenEdition
480 citations, 0.14%
|
|
World Scientific
437 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CAIRN
436 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
404 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
338 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Oxford University Press
293 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AOSIS
269 citations, 0.08%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
253 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
248 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AIP Publishing
241 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
212 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
210 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
195 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IntechOpen
189 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hans Publishers
187 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
180 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
155 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
149 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
145 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Index Copernicus
140 citations, 0.04%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
138 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
133 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
127 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
125 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Human Kinetics
115 citations, 0.03%
|
|
JMIR Publications
106 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
104 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
104 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korea Distribution Science Association (KODISA)
102 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
92 citations, 0.03%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
88 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
82 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akdeniz University Publishing Hous
81 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
79 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
78 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
78 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
77 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
75 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
72 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
69 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
67 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mendel University Press
65 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
64 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
63 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University
61 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
56 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Journal of Natural Resources
54 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Regional Science Association of Subotica (Drustvo za Regionalne Nauke)
53 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
52 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASTM International
51 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Mountain Society (IMS) and United Nations University
51 citations, 0.01%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
50 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
48 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
47 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
47 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Copernicus
47 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korea Contents Association
47 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
45 citations, 0.01%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
43 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taylor's University
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Research Center of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU)
42 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
41 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academy of Management
40 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
40 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Haworth Press
40 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
39 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Asociación Cuadernos de Economía
38 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
37 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
35 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Maya Global Education Society
35 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BMJ
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Thomas Telford
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
34 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
280 publications, 4.73%
|
|
University of Surrey
145 publications, 2.45%
|
|
Griffith University
111 publications, 1.88%
|
|
University of Queensland
100 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
76 publications, 1.28%
|
|
University of Central Florida
76 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Bournemouth University
74 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Texas A&M University
70 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Virginia Tech
65 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Sejong University
59 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Stirling
59 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Waikato
58 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Purdue University
58 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
57 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Massey University
54 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Temple University
52 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
49 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
49 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Waterloo
48 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Florida
43 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Otago
37 publications, 0.63%
|
|
James Cook University
35 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Arizona State University
35 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
32 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Calgary
31 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Florida State University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Monash University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
La Trobe University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Southern Cross University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Washington State University
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of the Balearic Islands
30 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Nankai University
29 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
28 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Leeds Beckett University
28 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Macau
27 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Exeter
27 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Plymouth
27 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of New South Wales
26 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
26 publications, 0.44%
|
|
National Chiayi University
26 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
25 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Victoria University (Australia)
24 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
23 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
23 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Xiamen University
22 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of South Australia
22 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Bradford
22 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
21 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Curtin University
21 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
21 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
21 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
20 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Fudan University
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Lincoln University
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Western Australia
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
George Washington University
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Westminster
19 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
18 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Canterbury
18 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Swansea University
18 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
18 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Valencia
18 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Nanjing University
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Taiwan University
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Birmingham
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Huaqiao University
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Stavanger
17 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Zhejiang University
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Central South University
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Bologna
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Edinburgh Napier University
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Ulster
16 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Jinan University
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
North Carolina State University
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Lancaster University
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
London Metropolitan University
15 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Clemson University
14 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Hainan University
14 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Girona
14 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
14 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Malaya
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
National University of Singapore
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Deakin University
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
City University of Macau
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
13 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Sichuan University
12 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
12 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Nottingham
12 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Michigan State University
12 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Wollongong
12 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
93 publications, 10.04%
|
|
University of Surrey
39 publications, 4.21%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
37 publications, 4%
|
|
University of Queensland
27 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Nankai University
24 publications, 2.59%
|
|
Virginia Tech
21 publications, 2.27%
|
|
University of Central Florida
19 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Griffith University
18 publications, 1.94%
|
|
University of Macau
18 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
17 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Florida State University
15 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Temple University
15 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
14 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Hainan University
13 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
12 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Sichuan University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Central South University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Huaqiao University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
11 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Texas A&M University
10 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Zhejiang University
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Xiamen University
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Florida
9 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Purdue University
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
San Jose State University
8 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Fudan University
7 publications, 0.76%
|
|
South China Normal University
7 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Sejong University
7 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Shandong University
7 publications, 0.76%
|
|
City University of Macau
7 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Jinan University
6 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
6 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Washington State University
6 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
6 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Cyprus University of Technology
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Nanjing University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Edinburgh Napier University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Nottingham
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Iowa State University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Curtin University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Boston University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Macau University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Lancaster University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Sheffield
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of North Texas
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Houston
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Greenwich
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Bournemouth University
5 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Linnaeus University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Wuhan University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Bologna
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Guangdong University of Technology
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Stavanger
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Auckland
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
James Cook University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Torrens University Australia
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Chiayi University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Cardiff University
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Modul University Vienna
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Vigo
4 publications, 0.43%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Allameh Tabataba'i University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Peking University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Southeast University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Northeastern University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Capital University of Economics and Business
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Durham University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Shanghai Normal University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Cornell University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Ningbo University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Otago
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Waikato
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
North Carolina State University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Zhejiang Normal University
3 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1165, 19.68%
United Kingdom
1165 publications, 19.68%
|
USA
|
USA, 984, 16.62%
USA
984 publications, 16.62%
|
China
|
China, 961, 16.23%
China
961 publications, 16.23%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 589, 9.95%
Australia
589 publications, 9.95%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 302, 5.1%
Spain
302 publications, 5.1%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 228, 3.85%
Canada
228 publications, 3.85%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 222, 3.75%
New Zealand
222 publications, 3.75%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 192, 3.24%
Republic of Korea
192 publications, 3.24%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 115, 1.94%
Turkey
115 publications, 1.94%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 112, 1.89%
Italy
112 publications, 1.89%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 99, 1.67%
Netherlands
99 publications, 1.67%
|
France
|
France, 72, 1.22%
France
72 publications, 1.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 64, 1.08%
Norway
64 publications, 1.08%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 57, 0.96%
Austria
57 publications, 0.96%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 52, 0.88%
Portugal
52 publications, 0.88%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 49, 0.83%
Greece
49 publications, 0.83%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 49, 0.83%
Israel
49 publications, 0.83%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 47, 0.79%
Malaysia
47 publications, 0.79%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 46, 0.78%
South Africa
46 publications, 0.78%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 44, 0.74%
Denmark
44 publications, 0.74%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 41, 0.69%
Germany
41 publications, 0.69%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 39, 0.66%
Switzerland
39 publications, 0.66%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 38, 0.64%
Japan
38 publications, 0.64%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 37, 0.63%
Sweden
37 publications, 0.63%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 34, 0.57%
Finland
34 publications, 0.57%
|
India
|
India, 33, 0.56%
India
33 publications, 0.56%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 32, 0.54%
Singapore
32 publications, 0.54%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 23, 0.39%
Ireland
23 publications, 0.39%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 23, 0.39%
Cyprus
23 publications, 0.39%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 23, 0.39%
Thailand
23 publications, 0.39%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 20, 0.34%
Belgium
20 publications, 0.34%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 18, 0.3%
Poland
18 publications, 0.3%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 17, 0.29%
Brazil
17 publications, 0.29%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 17, 0.29%
Iran
17 publications, 0.29%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 16, 0.27%
UAE
16 publications, 0.27%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 16, 0.27%
Croatia
16 publications, 0.27%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 14, 0.24%
Hungary
14 publications, 0.24%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 14, 0.24%
Slovenia
14 publications, 0.24%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 13, 0.22%
Egypt
13 publications, 0.22%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 10, 0.17%
Mexico
10 publications, 0.17%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 9, 0.15%
Argentina
9 publications, 0.15%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 9, 0.15%
Pakistan
9 publications, 0.15%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 8, 0.14%
Kenya
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 8, 0.14%
Mauritius
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 0.14%
Philippines
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 8, 0.14%
Chile
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 0.12%
Vietnam
7 publications, 0.12%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 6, 0.1%
Bulgaria
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 6, 0.1%
Serbia
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 6, 0.1%
Fiji
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 6, 0.1%
Czech Republic
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 6, 0.1%
Jamaica
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 5, 0.08%
Estonia
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 5, 0.08%
Botswana
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 0.08%
Ghana
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 5, 0.08%
Yugoslavia
5 publications, 0.08%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 4, 0.07%
Bahamas
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 4, 0.07%
Barbados
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.07%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.07%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.07%
Oman
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.07%
Romania
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.07%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 4, 0.07%
Uruguay
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.05%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.05%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 3, 0.05%
Cuba
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.05%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.05%
Peru
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.05%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.05%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.03%
Russia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.03%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.03%
Zimbabwe
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.03%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.03%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 0.03%
Kuwait
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.03%
Malta
2 publications, 0.03%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.03%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.03%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.03%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.02%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.02%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Andorra
|
Andorra, 1, 0.02%
Andorra
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Aruba
|
Aruba, 1, 0.02%
Aruba
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Haiti
|
Haiti, 1, 0.02%
Haiti
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.02%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cape Verde
|
Cape Verde, 1, 0.02%
Cape Verde
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.02%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0.02%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.02%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 1, 0.02%
Madagascar
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Maldives
|
Maldives, 1, 0.02%
Maldives
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.02%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.02%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.02%
Panama
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.02%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.02%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
China
|
China, 301, 32.51%
China
301 publications, 32.51%
|
USA
|
USA, 183, 19.76%
USA
183 publications, 19.76%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 142, 15.33%
United Kingdom
142 publications, 15.33%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 80, 8.64%
Australia
80 publications, 8.64%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 43, 4.64%
Spain
43 publications, 4.64%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 35, 3.78%
Republic of Korea
35 publications, 3.78%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 23, 2.48%
Italy
23 publications, 2.48%
|
France
|
France, 22, 2.38%
France
22 publications, 2.38%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 21, 2.27%
New Zealand
21 publications, 2.27%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 19, 2.05%
Norway
19 publications, 2.05%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 17, 1.84%
Turkey
17 publications, 1.84%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 16, 1.73%
Denmark
16 publications, 1.73%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 15, 1.62%
Portugal
15 publications, 1.62%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 13, 1.4%
Canada
13 publications, 1.4%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 11, 1.19%
Germany
11 publications, 1.19%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 11, 1.19%
Austria
11 publications, 1.19%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 1.19%
Netherlands
11 publications, 1.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 1.19%
South Africa
11 publications, 1.19%
|
India
|
India, 9, 0.97%
India
9 publications, 0.97%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 8, 0.86%
Finland
8 publications, 0.86%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 0.86%
Switzerland
8 publications, 0.86%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 0.86%
Sweden
8 publications, 0.86%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 8, 0.86%
Japan
8 publications, 0.86%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 0.76%
Poland
7 publications, 0.76%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.76%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.76%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.65%
Israel
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.65%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.65%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.65%
UAE
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.65%
Croatia
6 publications, 0.65%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.54%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.54%
Greece
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 0.54%
Ireland
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.54%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.54%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.54%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.43%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 0.43%
Egypt
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.43%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.43%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.32%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.32%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 0.32%
Ghana
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.32%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.32%
Iran
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.32%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.32%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.22%
Oman
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.22%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.22%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.22%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.11%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.11%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.11%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Bahamas
|
Bahamas, 1, 0.11%
Bahamas
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.11%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Cape Verde
|
Cape Verde, 1, 0.11%
Cape Verde
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.11%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.11%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.11%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.11%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 1, 0.11%
Monaco
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.11%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.11%
Panama
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.11%
Romania
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.11%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.11%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.11%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 1, 0.11%
Faroe Islands
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.11%
Chile
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.11%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.11%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.11%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.11%
|
Show all (38 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
2 profile journal articles
J. Luis
25 publications,
1 587 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Correia Marisol
42 publications,
507 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Plaza Beatriz
28 publications,
899 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Vanclay Frank
205 publications,
10 817 citations
h-index: 48