Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4.7
SJR
0.956
CiteScore
9.2
Categories
Biotechnology
Plant Science
Genetics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Years of issue
2005-2025
journal names
Plant Methods
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Nanjing Agricultural University
(45 publications)

ETH Zurich
(28 publications)

Wageningen University and Research Centre
(26 publications)

Nanjing Agricultural University
(28 publications)

China Agricultural University
(18 publications)

Beijing Forestry University
(13 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 5199
Q1

Treetop: topology optimization using constructive solid geometry trees
Kumar Padhy R., Thombre P., Suresh K., Chandrasekhar A.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Integrating moving morphable components and plastic layout optimization: a two-stage approach for enhanced structural topology optimization
Lotfalian A., Esmaeilpour P., Yoon G.H., Takalloozadeh M.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Simultaneous node-based shape and thickness optimization of thin-walled structures using the explicit Vertex Morphing method
Schmölz D., Devresse B., Geiser A., Bletzinger K.
Abstract
Node-based shape optimization has been successfully and consistently formulated via shape and sensitivity filtering methods. This work studies the union of the Vertex Morphing method, a shape parameterization technique that uses an explicit shape filtering approach, and shell thickness optimization. On this occasion, thickness variables are explicitly filtered similarly to the shape, but their filter is computed on the initial geometry configuration throughout the optimization. The problem is formulated such that both design variable types are optimized concurrently. Gradient-based algorithms are employed to solve the optimization problem, which have proven well suited for the Vertex Morphing method. Due to the different dimensionalities of the shape and thickness variables, a design variable scaling method between the two types is proposed, improving the convergence behavior without the necessity of second-order information. Academic examples and the application of a structure with industrial significance illustrate the method’s success.
Q1

Connectivity-driven topology optimization for path-following compliant mechanism: a formulation with predictive volume constraints and adaptive strategies for gray element suppression
Zhang L., Koppen S., van Keulen F.
Abstract
We propose a topology optimization (TO) formulation and related optimization scheme for designing compliant mechanisms following a user-defined trajectory. To ensure the broad applicability and achieve precisely control of the outputs, geometric nonlinearity with incremental solutions are considered. A challenge in the design optimization of these structures is the development of formulations with satisfactory balance between (i) precise trajectory control and (ii) proper connectivity between the input/output ports and the support. Previously proposed density-based topology optimization formulations typically lack the promotion of the desired load-transferring connections, or usually complicate the design using mixed shape, size, and topology variables to enforce a minimum connectivity. To simplify design progress using exclusive topology variables, i.e., purely density-based TO methods, we propose a relatively straightforward formulation involving commonly used response functions, such as compliance and volume as constraints. For the constraints, the paper provides a scheme for defining corresponding upper limits. Numerical examples of challenging shell and plate design optimization problems demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation and scheme in the generation of load-transferring connections while limiting the impact on the performance of the path generation functionality.
Q1

Multiscale structural concurrent fail-safe topology optimization
Ding W., Jia H., Xu P., Zhang Y., Cheng F.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Minimum size control for binary topology optimization
Cortez R.L., Setta M., Picelli R., Wadbro E.
Abstract
Topology optimization methods employing binary (also known as discrete) design variables currently lack mathematical formulations to ensure length scale control in their solutions. This paper proposes and applies a morphology-mimicking filtering scheme to provide a minimum size control (often also referred to as minimum length scale control) in this class of binary designs. The Topology Optimization of Binary Structures (TOBS) method was chosen as the foundational framework for this length scale control study. Thermal and structural compliance scenarios were explored under this approach. Numerical results show that the proposed filter efficiently imposes the desired minimum length scale. The optimized designs were also less dependent on the filtering parameters when compared to designs optimized using standard techniques that employ continuous design variables.
Q1

Automatic projection parameter increase for three-field density-based topology optimization
Dunning P., Wein F.
Abstract
A method is proposed to automatically increase the threshold projection parameter in three-field density-based topology optimization to achieve near binary designs. The three-field method is composed of an element-wise design density field that is filtered and then passed through a smooth threshold projection function to compute the projected density field, which is then used to compute element properties, e.g., using a power law for stiffness. The sharpness of the threshold projection function is controlled by a parameter
$$\beta $$
β
. In this paper, a method is introduced to automatically increase this parameter during optimization by linking it to the change in objective function. Furthermore, the gray value indicator is added as a stopping criterion to guarantee the solution is near binary. This results in a method that does not need to be tuned for specific problems, or optimizers, and the same set of user-defined parameters can be used for a wide range of problems. However, a high value of the threshold projection parameter may cause convergence issues for some optimizers, such as the optimally criteria method, and an adaptive move limit strategy is introduced to overcome this problem. It is also shown that some problems require length-scale control to achieve a near binary design. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated on several benchmark problems, including linear compliance, linear buckling, compliant mechanism, heat conduction, and geometrically nonlinear problems.
Q1

A sequential linear programming approach for truss optimization based on the uncertainty analysis-based data-driven computational mechanics (UA-DDCM)
Huang M., Du Z., Liu C., Zhang W., Guo X.
Q1
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Topology optimization for pressurized nonlinear structures using substructure and experimental studies
Lu Y., Luo Q., Tong L.
Abstract
A compliant structure under fluidic pressure can undergo relatively large shape change, but the design of such type of structure is challenging as the pressure distribution depends on detailed structural geometry. In this study, a novel mixed substructure-density (MSD) model is proposed for topology representation and update in the optimal design of nonlinear compliant structures under quasi-static fluidic pressure. An optimization algorithm is developed via implementing the present model by using super-elements in commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software. Numerical examples are presented to validate the present model, algorithm, and designs numerically via full linear and nonlinear FEAs. A planar cellular network with five cells arranged in parallel is then designed for representing a pressurized wing rib structure capable of modulating airfoil thickness variation. The test results of the single-cell and five-cell PCS specimens prototyped using polyurethane material show that the respective cell thickness can be reduced by 11.9 and 6.4% respectively under a cell pressure of 250 kPa.
Q1

Constructability-based multi-objective optimization with machine learning-enhanced meta-heuristics for reinforcing bar design in rectangular concrete columns
Verduzco L.F.
Abstract
Optimization of reinforcing bar (rebar) design represents a preponderant factor in reducing material usage and wastes for reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The assessment of constructability of such rebar designs is crucial to improve their practicality and reduce construction costs, which makes the problem multi-objective (MO). However, when applying optimization methods for the design of rebar in RC structures, little attention has been paid on columns, in comparison to beams and slabs. Meta-heuristic algorithms (MA) have been the ones mostly deployed for these types of elements, which have proven to be of high computational cost. Additionally, an existing gap in the literature as to how to relate the design and construction stage of rebar in RC structures through constructability analysis is evident. In this regard, research has been focused mainly at the building level but not at the element level. This works presents a novel algorithmic framework using Machine Learning (ML)-enhanced meta-heuristics for the optimal design of rebar on rectangular RC columns. To assess the constructability of the resulting rebar layouts a Buildability Score (BS) model at the element level is proposed. The complexity analysis of rebar design under the constructability restrictions, through combinatorial optimization (CO), is used to assess the global time efficiency of the framework. The Non-Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) was deployed for showcase and five different ML algorithms were used to enhance it, namely the k-NN classifier, SVM regression, ANN, Gauss Process (GP) regression, and Tree Ensembles (TE), where the latter three showed the best performance.
Q1

Density-based hole seeding in XFEM level-set topology optimization of fluid problems
Høghøj L.C., Andreasen C.S., Maute K.
Abstract
The optimization results of level-set methods typically suffer from a strong dependence on the initial design. To mitigate this dependence, this work presents a density-based hole nucleation method for level-set topology optimization of flow problems. This is achieved by defining both the level-set and density values as functions of the design variables. To preserve the crispness of the geometry definition afforded by the level-set method, the fluid flow is modeled using the Heaviside enriched eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) for the laminar incompressible Navier–Stokes equation, which is augmented by a Brinkman model. The boundary conditions are enforced weakly using Nitsche’s method. A face-oriented ghost stabilization scheme is applied to stabilize the XFEM formulation. Additional terms ensuring stability are added to Nitsche’s method and the ghost stabilization to account for the Brinkman term in the Navier–Stokes equation. The necessity of adding these terms is highlighted by numerical studies. Two- and three-dimensional fluid manifolds are optimized to minimize fluid power dissipation while achieving a predefined mass flow distribution among the outlets. The optimization results show that the proposed method bypasses the need for an initial hole seeding and speeds up the convergence of the optimization process.
Q1

Topology optimization of beams’ cross-sectional properties considering torsional and warping behavior
Kostopoulos C., Marzok A., Waisman H.
This paper introduces a novel efficient topology optimization methodology for beams’ torsion using the warping function formulation. The finite element method is used to discretize the cross-section and an efficient gradient-based optimization problem is formulated to optimize the relevant parameters corresponding to the torsion and warping constants of the beam. As a result, for the first time, one can optimize a beam for problems where the warping behavior is dominant. Density-based optimization is defined where the SIMP approach is utilized to penalize intermediate element densities. A key challenge of the optimization that arises in the warping function framework is the design-dependent nature of the problem. That is, the forcing vector varies during the optimization as it depends on the cross-section boundaries, which are functions of the updating topology. To this end, a differentiable boundary recognition algorithm is proposed. The methodology is applied to design beam cross-sections in which both torsion and warping constants are of interest. While intuitive topologies are obtained in the case of optimized torsion constant, this is not the case for the warping constant. The latter shows unique material distributions and a special dependence on the allowable material density.
Q1

Uncertainty-based multi-disciplinary multi-objective design optimization of unmanned mining electric shovel
Hu Z., Long X., Lian K., Lin S., Song X.
Electric shovel (ES) is a large mining equipment crucial for energy security. The traditional design of the structure and control system of ES is carried out in stages, and the influence of the structural uncertainty for the system is not considered, which makes it difficult to obtain the optimal parameters of the system. Facing the demand of intelligent development, ES designed using traditional deterministic methods is difficult to meet the working demand of unmanned mining electric shovel (UMES). To address these challenges, this paper proposes an uncertainty-based multidisciplinary multi-objective optimization (UMMO) framework for UMES. Within this framework, the mechanical structure of the front-end mechanism was analyzed, excavation trajectories were planned based on a polynomial point-to-point motion strategy, and models for the excavation resistance of the dipper and the dynamical model of the front-end working device were constructed. Then, optimization objective functions were constructed with excavation energy consumption, excavation efficiency, and full dipper rate as targets. By analyzing the working characteristics of UMES, essential constraints were introduced for the mechanical system, control system and hardware. The UMMO optimization model was established to enhance the reliability of the UMES production process. Finally, the mechanical structure dimensions and control system parameters are optimized to generate the optimal physical structure and excavation trajectory considering uncertainties. The numerical results show that compared with the deterministic optimization results, the optimized structure of the proposed UMMO strategy is more compact and the mechanical structure is more reliable in the production process.
Q1

A collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems
Ye K., Wang H., Ma X.
Complex engineering systems that involve multiple disciplines or scales are often decomposed into multiple subsystems in a nested or hierarchical manner to enhance the analysis efficiency. However, uncertainties inherent in input parameters will propagate with hierarchy, and severely threaten the reliability of engineering systems. Adaptive surrogate modeling technique is a potent tool to alleviate the computational burden of reliability analysis, especially involving time-consuming computer experiments. Conventional black-box adaptive surrogate modeling framework did not incorporate nested characteristic, which is inefficient for the reliability analysis of complex systems with nested or hierarchical characteristics. This paper develops a collaborative adaptive Kriging-based algorithm for the reliability analysis of nested systems. First, we propose a nested U-function to propel the adaptive updating of underlying Kriging models and derive its approximate closed form based on a defined most probable misclassification point. Then, an accuracy enhancement stage is devised to compensate for the inaccuracies of first-order approximation in early iterations. A parallel radius-based importance sampling technique is presented to mitigate the computational effort at multiple candidates. Finally, an index considering the reduction of model uncertainty is exploited to quantify the contribution of individual Kriging model and select the to-be-refined Kriging model in one iteration. Through numerical examples and case studies, the superiority of the proposed methodology is comprehensively illustrated compared with other benchmark methods.
Q1

Discrete variable topology optimization using multi-cut formulation and adaptive trust regions
Ye Z., Pan W.
We present a new framework for efficiently solving general topology optimization (TO) problems that find an optimal material distribution within a design space to maximize the performance of a part or structure while satisfying design constraints. These problems can involve convex or non-convex objective functions and may include multiple candidate materials. The framework is designed to greatly enhance computational efficiency, primarily by diminishing optimization iteration counts and thereby reducing the frequency of solving associated state equilibrium partial differential equations (PDEs) (e.g., through the finite element method (FEM)). It maintains binary design variables and addresses the large-scale mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem that arises from discretizing the design space and PDEs. The core of this framework is the integration of the generalized Benders’ decomposition and adaptive trust regions. Specifically, by formulating the master sub-problem (decomposed from the MINLP) as a multi-cut optimization problem and enabling the estimation of the upper and lower bounds of the original objective function, significant acceleration in solution convergence is achieved. The trust region radius adapts based on a merit function. To mitigate ill-conditioning due to extreme parameter values, we further introduce a parameter relaxation scheme where two parameters are relaxed in stages at different paces, improving both solution quality and efficiency. Numerical tests validate the framework’s superior performance, including minimum compliance and compliant mechanism problems in single-material and multi-material designs. We compare our results with those of other methods and demonstrate significant reductions in optimization iterations (and therefore the number of FEM analyses required) by about one order of magnitude, while maintaining comparable optimal objective function values and material layouts. As the design variables and constraints increase, the framework maintains consistent solution quality and efficiency, underscoring its good scalability. We anticipate this framework will be especially advantageous for TO applications involving substantial design variables and constraints and requiring significant computational resources for FEM analyses (or PDE solving).
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
3182 citations, 6.1%
|
|
Plant Methods
1528 citations, 2.93%
|
|
Plants
1040 citations, 1.99%
|
|
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
969 citations, 1.86%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Botany
965 citations, 1.85%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
901 citations, 1.73%
|
|
Remote Sensing
857 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Plant Journal
797 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Agronomy
774 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Scientific Reports
758 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
717 citations, 1.38%
|
|
New Phytologist
678 citations, 1.3%
|
|
PLoS ONE
662 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Plant Physiology
574 citations, 1.1%
|
|
BMC Plant Biology
573 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Sensors
448 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources
372 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
371 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Plant Science
359 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Plant, Cell and Environment
356 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Plant Cell
350 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Plant Biotechnology Journal
302 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Nature Communications
252 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Scientia Horticulturae
235 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Molecular Plant
227 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
226 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
226 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Planta
224 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Plant Cell Reports
221 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
209 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Genes
201 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Trends in Plant Science
195 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Plant Phenomics
188 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Horticulturae
186 citations, 0.36%
|
|
BMC Genomics
185 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Horticulture Research
182 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Plant and Cell Physiology
173 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Physiologia Plantarum
166 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Forests
157 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Plant and Soil
153 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Industrial Crops and Products
152 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Environmental and Experimental Botany
150 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Plant Molecular Biology
149 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Molecules
142 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IEEE Access
131 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
128 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
124 citations, 0.24%
|
|
PeerJ
121 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
119 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Crop Journal
118 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Field Crops Research
114 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Plant Physiology
108 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
107 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Precision Agriculture
104 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
100 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Postharvest Biology and Technology
99 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Journal of Agronomy
98 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nature Plants
96 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
96 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biosystems Engineering
95 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Molecular Breeding
94 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
94 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
92 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Smart Agricultural Technology
92 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
90 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Foods
89 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Functional Plant Biology
89 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sustainability
87 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Annals of Botany
86 citations, 0.16%
|
|
PLoS Genetics
83 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Molecular Plant Pathology
81 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
76 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Acta Horticulturae
75 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Crop Science
74 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Phytopathology
73 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
73 citations, 0.14%
|
|
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
72 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Plant Direct
71 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
71 citations, 0.14%
|
|
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
69 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plant Communications
68 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Drones
68 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Euphytica
67 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Plant Disease
66 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Food Chemistry
66 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Applications in Plant Sciences
64 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Plant Phenome Journal
63 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
62 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Plant Breeding
61 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cells
61 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Viruses
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Molecular Biology Reports
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Protoplasma
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
58 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Rice
56 citations, 0.11%
|
|
eLife
56 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Remote Sensing of Environment
55 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
54 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
54 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Gene
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
|
Springer Nature
11182 citations, 21.44%
|
|
Elsevier
9120 citations, 17.49%
|
|
MDPI
6831 citations, 13.1%
|
|
Wiley
5035 citations, 9.66%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3813 citations, 7.31%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2863 citations, 5.49%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2152 citations, 4.13%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1207 citations, 2.31%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1154 citations, 2.21%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
876 citations, 1.68%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
463 citations, 0.89%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
337 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Scientific Societies
318 citations, 0.61%
|
|
192 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
182 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
176 citations, 0.34%
|
|
PeerJ
153 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
150 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
145 citations, 0.28%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
143 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Publishing
138 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Annual Reviews
136 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
123 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
118 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
107 citations, 0.21%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
102 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
88 citations, 0.17%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
88 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
81 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
78 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IntechOpen
77 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
73 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Japanese Society of Breeding
73 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Royal Society
66 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Japanese Society for Plant Cell and Molecular Biology
61 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Portland Press
59 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SAGE
54 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
53 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SciELO
51 citations, 0.1%
|
|
AIP Publishing
47 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
45 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
45 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
45 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
43 citations, 0.08%
|
|
EDP Sciences
42 citations, 0.08%
|
|
F1000 Research
37 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
36 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IGI Global
36 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
35 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE)
35 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Magnolia Press
33 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
32 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Experimental Botany
31 citations, 0.06%
|
|
King Saud University
29 citations, 0.06%
|
|
China National Rice Research Institute
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
26 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Copernicus
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
23 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bio-Protocol
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
20 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Breeding Science
19 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Gabonatermesztesi Kutato Kozhasznu Tarsasag/Cereal Research Non-Profit Company
19 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Fundacion Romulo Raggio
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academic Journals
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Microbiology Society
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Society of Genetics
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
14 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brill
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
13 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
12 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Impact Journals
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Society of Agricultural Meteorology of Japan
11 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Allerton Press
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
10 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Crop Sciences (ICS)
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science in China Press
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BioOne
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Horticultural Science
9 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
S. Karger AG
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
45 publications, 2.83%
|
|
ETH Zurich
28 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
26 publications, 1.63%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
25 publications, 1.57%
|
|
China Agricultural University
24 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Queensland
24 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Adelaide
24 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
23 publications, 1.45%
|
|
John Innes Centre
21 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
20 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
19 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology
19 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
18 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Nottingham
18 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Michigan State University
17 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of California, Davis
17 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
16 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research
16 publications, 1.01%
|
|
AgroParisTech
16 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
16 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Zhejiang University
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Australian National University
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Cornell University
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Minnesota
15 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Western Australia
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
14 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
13 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Cambridge
13 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Iowa State University
13 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
13 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Ghent University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Wuhan University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Northwest University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Melbourne
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Washington State University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Lancaster University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Florida
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Texas A&M University
12 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Shihezi University
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Aarhus University
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Australian Research Council
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Purdue University
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Tokyo
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Rothamsted Research
11 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Helsinki
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Padua
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
La Trobe University
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of South Australia
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Manchester
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Clemson University
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Ohio State University
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Henan Agricultural University
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Kansas State University
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Guelph
9 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Tehran
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Shenyang Agricultural University
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Virginia Tech
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Barcelona
8 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Imperial College London
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Yangzhou University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Plant and Food Research
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
North Carolina State University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Guangxi University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Brigham Young University
7 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Liège
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hebei Agricultural University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Harvard University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hunan Agricultural University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hainan University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Utrecht University
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Potsdam
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Reading
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Institute for Sustainable Agriculture
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Spanish National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology
6 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Tübingen
5 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
28 publications, 3.61%
|
|
China Agricultural University
18 publications, 2.32%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
13 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
13 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
13 publications, 1.68%
|
|
Shihezi University
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
10 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Zhejiang University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Ghent University
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Melbourne
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Queensland
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Minnesota
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
9 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Australian National University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Henan Agricultural University
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Forschungszentrum Jülich
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
AgroParisTech
8 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Tehran
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Shenyang Agricultural University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Adelaide
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Washington State University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Davis
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Guangxi University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Texas A&M University
7 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Wuhan University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Cambridge
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Michigan State University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Northwest University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
La Trobe University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Australian Research Council
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Clemson University
6 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Hebei Agricultural University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Padua
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Weifang University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Hainan University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Purdue University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Guelph
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Florida
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Brigham Young University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nanjing University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Anhui Agricultural University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Iowa State University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Utrecht University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Tokyo
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Kansas State University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Spanish National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Shiraz University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Urmia University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Peking University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Sichuan University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Central South University of Forestry and Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
ETH Zurich
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Umeå University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Turin
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shanghai Normal University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Yangtze University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Aarhus University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Jiangsu University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Yangzhou University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
North Dakota State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Agriculture Victoria
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Zhejiang A&F University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
New York University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Ohio State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Keio University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
China
|
China, 423, 26.59%
China
423 publications, 26.59%
|
USA
|
USA, 329, 20.68%
USA
329 publications, 20.68%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 174, 10.94%
Germany
174 publications, 10.94%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 146, 9.18%
United Kingdom
146 publications, 9.18%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 120, 7.54%
Australia
120 publications, 7.54%
|
France
|
France, 101, 6.35%
France
101 publications, 6.35%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 56, 3.52%
Japan
56 publications, 3.52%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 52, 3.27%
Spain
52 publications, 3.27%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 46, 2.89%
Canada
46 publications, 2.89%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 42, 2.64%
Netherlands
42 publications, 2.64%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 40, 2.51%
Italy
40 publications, 2.51%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 40, 2.51%
Switzerland
40 publications, 2.51%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 35, 2.2%
Czech Republic
35 publications, 2.2%
|
India
|
India, 33, 2.07%
India
33 publications, 2.07%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 33, 2.07%
Republic of Korea
33 publications, 2.07%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 32, 2.01%
Belgium
32 publications, 2.01%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 30, 1.89%
Denmark
30 publications, 1.89%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 26, 1.63%
New Zealand
26 publications, 1.63%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 25, 1.57%
Austria
25 publications, 1.57%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 24, 1.51%
Iran
24 publications, 1.51%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 24, 1.51%
Poland
24 publications, 1.51%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 23, 1.45%
Brazil
23 publications, 1.45%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 21, 1.32%
Mexico
21 publications, 1.32%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 21, 1.32%
Sweden
21 publications, 1.32%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 13, 0.82%
Finland
13 publications, 0.82%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 0.63%
Israel
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 10, 0.63%
Saudi Arabia
10 publications, 0.63%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 0.63%
South Africa
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 9, 0.57%
Hungary
9 publications, 0.57%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 0.57%
Egypt
9 publications, 0.57%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 9, 0.57%
Kenya
9 publications, 0.57%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.5%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 7, 0.44%
Russia
7 publications, 0.44%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.44%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.44%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 0.44%
Pakistan
7 publications, 0.44%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 0.38%
Portugal
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 6, 0.38%
Singapore
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.31%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 5, 0.31%
Norway
5 publications, 0.31%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.31%
UAE
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.31%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.31%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.25%
Greece
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.25%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 4, 0.25%
Ethiopia
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.19%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.19%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.19%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 0.13%
Armenia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.13%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.13%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.13%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.13%
Romania
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.13%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.13%
Chile
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.13%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.06%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.06%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.06%
Benin
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.06%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.06%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.06%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.06%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.06%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.06%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.06%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.06%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.06%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.06%
Peru
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.06%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.06%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.06%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.06%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.06%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.06%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.06%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.06%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (46 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
China
|
China, 272, 35.1%
China
272 publications, 35.1%
|
USA
|
USA, 134, 17.29%
USA
134 publications, 17.29%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 56, 7.23%
Germany
56 publications, 7.23%
|
France
|
France, 46, 5.94%
France
46 publications, 5.94%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 40, 5.16%
Australia
40 publications, 5.16%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 30, 3.87%
United Kingdom
30 publications, 3.87%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 24, 3.1%
Italy
24 publications, 3.1%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 22, 2.84%
Canada
22 publications, 2.84%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 22, 2.84%
Japan
22 publications, 2.84%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 21, 2.71%
Iran
21 publications, 2.71%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 21, 2.71%
Republic of Korea
21 publications, 2.71%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 20, 2.58%
Netherlands
20 publications, 2.58%
|
India
|
India, 18, 2.32%
India
18 publications, 2.32%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 18, 2.32%
Czech Republic
18 publications, 2.32%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 17, 2.19%
Spain
17 publications, 2.19%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 1.68%
Belgium
13 publications, 1.68%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 1.68%
Denmark
13 publications, 1.68%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 12, 1.55%
Switzerland
12 publications, 1.55%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 11, 1.42%
Poland
11 publications, 1.42%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 1.29%
Brazil
10 publications, 1.29%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 10, 1.29%
Sweden
10 publications, 1.29%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 7, 0.9%
Hungary
7 publications, 0.9%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 7, 0.9%
New Zealand
7 publications, 0.9%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 6, 0.77%
Austria
6 publications, 0.77%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.77%
Israel
6 publications, 0.77%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 0.77%
Mexico
6 publications, 0.77%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 5, 0.65%
Russia
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 4, 0.52%
Ireland
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.52%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.52%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 4, 0.52%
Finland
4 publications, 0.52%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.52%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.39%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.39%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.39%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.39%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.26%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 0.26%
Armenia
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.26%
Greece
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.26%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.26%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.26%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.26%
UAE
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.26%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.26%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.13%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.13%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.13%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.13%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.13%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.13%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.13%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.13%
Norway
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.13%
Peru
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.13%
Romania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.13%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.13%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.13%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.13%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0.13%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.13%
Chile
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.13%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (31 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
1 profile journal article
Klepikova Anna

Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
32 publications,
1 063 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Shadrin Dmitrii

Irkutsk National Research Technical University
45 publications,
652 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Safaie Naser
🥼 🤝
PhD in Agricultural sciences, Associate Professor

Tarbiat Modares University
119 publications,
1 832 citations
h-index: 26
Research interests
Biological control
Endophytic Fungi
Mycology
Plant Pathology
1 profile journal article
Kuchitsu Kazuyuki

Tokyo University of Science
133 publications,
12 734 citations
h-index: 46
1 profile journal article
Haseloff Jim
110 publications,
9 214 citations
h-index: 48
1 profile journal article
Oluwaseun Suleimon
8 publications,
83 citations
h-index: 3
1 profile journal article
Professor Mohamed
🥼 🤝
Menoufia University
100 publications,
2 124 citations
h-index: 24