Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
SJR
0.298
CiteScore
2.2
Categories
Infectious Diseases
Microbiology (medical)
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
1979-2025
journal names
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
Top-3 citing journals

Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
(477 citations)

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(287 citations)

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
(190 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Massachusetts General Hospital
(47 publications)

Mayo Clinic
(31 publications)

Virginia Commonwealth University
(22 publications)

Mayo Clinic
(8 publications)

Virginia Commonwealth University
(8 publications)

Washington University in St. Louis
(4 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 370
Sampling methods for the concentration parameter and discrete baseline of the Dirichlet Process
Liu Y., Nandram B.
Abstract
There are many models in the current statistical literature for making inferences based on samples selected from a finite population. Parametric models may be problematic because statistical inference is sensitive to parametric assumptions. The Dirichlet process (DP) prior is very flexible and determines the complexity of the model. It is indexed by two hyper-parameters: the baseline distribution and concentration parameter. We address two distinct problems in the article. Firstly, we review the current sampling methods for the concentration parameter, which use the continuous baseline distribution. We compare three different methods: the adaptive rejection method, the mixture of Gammas method and the grid method. We also propose a new method based on the ratio of uniforms. Secondly, in practice, some survey responses are known to be discrete. If a continuous distribution is adopted as the baseline distribution, the model is misspecified and standard inference may be invalid. We propose a discrete baseline approach to the DP prior and sample the unobserved responses from the finite population both using a Polya urn scheme and a Multinomial distribution. We applied our discrete baseline approach to a Phytophthora data set.
Missing data estimation based on the chaining technique in survey sampling
Thakur N.S., Shukla D.
Abstract
Sample surveys are often affected by missing observations and non-response caused by the respondents’ refusal or unwillingness to provide the requested information or due to their memory failure. In order to substitute the missing data, a procedure called imputation is applied, which uses the available data as a tool for the replacement of the missing values. Two auxiliary variables create a chain which is used to substitute the missing part of the sample. The aim of the paper is to present the application of the Chain-type factor estimator as a means of source imputation for the non-response units in an incomplete sample. The proposed strategies were found to be more efficient and bias-controllable than similar estimation procedures described in the relevant literature. These techniques could also be made nearly unbiased in relation to other selected parametric values. The findings are supported by a numerical study involving the use of a dataset, proving that the proposed techniques outperform other similar ones.
Generalised Lindley shared additive frailty regression model for bivariate survival data
Pandey A., Hanagal D.D., Tyagi S.
Abstract
Frailty models are the possible choice to counter the problem of the unobserved heterogeneity in individual risks of disease and death. Based on earlier studies, shared frailty models can be utilised in the analysis of bivariate data related to survival times (e.g. matched pairs experiments, twin or family data). In this article, we assume that frailty acts additively to the hazard rate. A new class of shared frailty models based on generalised Lindley distribution is established. By assuming generalised Weibull and generalised log-logistic baseline distributions, we propose a new class of shared frailty models based on the additive hazard rate. We estimate the parameters in these frailty models and use the Bayesian paradigm of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. Model selection criteria have been applied for the comparison of models. We analyse kidney infection data and suggest the best model.
Zero-modified Poisson-Modification of Quasi Lindley distribution and its application
Tharshan R., Wijekoon P.
Abstract
The Poisson-Modification of Quasi Lindley (PMQL) distribution is a newly introduced mixed Poisson distribution for over-dispersed count data. The aim of this article is to introduce the Zero-modified PMQL (ZMPMQL) distribution as an alternative to the PMQL distribution in order to accommodate zero inflation/deflation. The method of obtaining the ZMPMQL distribution jointly with some of its important properties, namely the probability mass and distribution functions, mean, variance, index of dispersion, and quantile function are presented. Furthermore, some of its special cases are discussed. The maximum likelihood (ML) estimation method is used for the unknown parameter estimation. A simulation study is conducted in order to evaluate the asymptotic theory of the ML estimation method and to show the superiority of the ML method over the method of moments estimation. The applicability of the introduced distribution is illustrated by using a real-world data set.
Comparison of confidence intervals for variance components in an unbalanced one-way random effects model
Jiratampradab A., Supapakorn T., Suntornchost J.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study and compare the methods for constructing confidence intervals for variance components in an unbalanced one-way random effects model. The methods are based on a classical exact, generalised pivotal quantity, a fiducial inference and a fiducial generalised pivotal quantity. The comparison of criteria involves the empirical coverage probability that maintains at the nominal confidence level of 0.95 and the shortest average length of the confidence interval. The simulation results show that the method based on the generalised pivotal quantity and the fiducial inference perform very well in terms of both the empirical coverage probability and the average length of the confidence interval. The classical exact method performs well in some situations, while the fiducial generalised pivotal quantity performs well in a very unbalanced design. Therefore, the method based on the generalised pivotal quantity is recommended for all situations.
Optimal allocation for equal probability two-stage design
Molefe W.
Abstract
This paper develops optimal designs when it is not feasible for every cluster to be represented in a sample as in stratified design, by assuming equal probability two-stage sampling where clusters are small areas. The paper develops allocation methods for two-stage sample surveys where small-area estimates are a priority. We seek efficient allocations where the aim is to minimize the linear combination of the mean squared errors of composite small area estimators and of an estimator of the overall mean. We suggest some alternative allocations with a view to minimizing the same objective. Several alternatives, including the area-only stratified design, are found to perform nearly as well as the optimal allocation but with better practical properties. Designs are evaluated numerically using Switzerland canton data as well as Botswana administrative districts data.
Robustness of randomisation tests as alternative analysis methods for repeated measures design
Oladugba A.V., Obasi A.J., Asogwa O.C.
Abstract
Randomisation tests (R-tests) are regularly proposed as an alternative method of hypothesis testing when assumptions of classical statistical methods are violated in data analysis. In this paper, the robustness in terms of the type-I-error and the power of the R-test were evaluated and compared with that of the F-test in the analysis of a single factor repeated measures design. The study took into account normal and non-normal data (skewed: exponential, lognormal, Chi-squared, and Weibull distributions), the presence and lack of outliers, and a situation in which the sphericity assumption was met or not under varied sample sizes and number of treatments. The Monte Carlo approach was used in the simulation study. The results showed that when the data were normal, the R-test was approximately as sensitive and robust as the F-test, while being more sensitive than the F-test when data had skewed distributions. The R-test was more sensitive and robust than the F-test in the presence of an outlier. When the sphericity assumption was met, both the R-test and the F-test were approximately equally sensitive, whereas the R-test was more sensitive and robust than the F-test when the sphericity assumption was not met.
Changes in the structure of household disposable income in selected countries as a reflection of crises after 2000
Hindls R., Marek L., Hronová S.
Abstract
Wages and salaries represent the most important component of household disposable income. The aim of the article is to examine how the relationship between the shares of households’ wages and final consumption expenditure in their gross disposable income has developed over the past 20 years. The presented analysis uses publicly available national accounts data for 30 countries for the period of 2000–2019. The studied indicators include the proportion of households’ wages and salaries, and final consumption expenditure in their gross disposable income. Using the proposed method based on the evaluation of changes in the spatial map, it is possible to observe any significant changes in these proportion values in the years of financial crisis and recession, as well as in the years of prosperity. The procedure can therefore serve as an indicator of appreciable changes in economic development.
Parameter estimation of exponentiated exponential distribution under selective ranked set sampling
Hassan A.S., Elshaarawy R.S., Nagy H.F.
Abstract
Partial ranked set sampling (PRSS) is a cost-effective sampling method. It is a combination of simple random sample (SRS) and ranked set sampling (RSS) designs. The PRSS method allows flexibility for the experimenter in selecting the sample when it is either difficult to rank the units within each set with full confidence or when experimental units are not available. In this article, we introduce and define the likelihood function of any probability distribution under the PRSS scheme. The performance of the maximum likelihood estimators is examined when the available data are assumed to have an exponentiated exponential (EE) distribution via some selective RSS schemes as well as SRS. The suggested ranked schemes include the PRSS, RSS, neoteric RSS (NRSS), and extreme RSS (ERSS). An intensive simulation study was conducted to compare and explore the behaviour of the proposed estimators. The study demonstrated that the maximum likelihood estimators via PRSS, NRSS, ERSS, and RSS schemes are more efficient than the corresponding estimators under SRS. A real data set is presented for illustrative purposes.
The Weibull lifetime model with randomised failure-free time
Sulewski P., Szymkowiak M.
Abstract
The paper shows that treating failure-free time in the three-parameter Weibull distribution not a constant, but as a random variable makes the resulting distribution much more flexible at the expense of only one additional parameter.
k-th record estimator of the scale parameter of the α-stable distribution
Stachura M., Wodecka B.
Abstract
Various techniques of scale parameter estimation have been proposed in the case of alpha stable distributions. In the paper, the authors present an estimation technique that involves the k-th record theory. Although this theory is over 40 years old, its implementation in the classical extreme value theory – being the other cornerstone of the presented approach – is quite new, and tempting. Several theoretical properties of the introduced scale parameter estimators are presented. With the use of Monte Carlo methods, a comparative analysis is performed between the approach based on k-th records and approaches based on Hill’s and Pickands’ estimators. Additionally, the paper uses a real-life data set to illustrate how to effectively apply the k-th record estimator of the scale parameter. The research indicates several advantages of the k-th record approach over its other counterparts, especially when dealing with incomplete information about the underlying sample.
Supsim: a Python package and a web-based JavaScript tool to address the theoretical complexities in two-predictor suppression situations
Nazifi M., Fadishei H.
Abstract
Two-predictor suppression situations continue to produce uninterpretable conditions in linear regression. In an attempt to address the theoretical complexities related to suppression situations, the current study introduces two different versions of a software called suppression simulator (Supsim): a) the command-line Python package, and b) the web-based JavaScript tool, both of which are able to simulate numerous random two-predictor models (RTMs). RTMs are randomly generated, normally distributed data vectors x1
, x2
, and y simulated in such a way that regressing y on both x1
and x2
results in the occurrence of numerous suppression and non-suppression situations. The web-based Supsim requires no coding skills and additionally, it provides users with 3D scatterplots of the simulated RTMs. This study shows that comparing 3D scatterplots of different suppression and non-suppression situations provides important new insights into the underlying mechanisms of two-predictor suppression situations. An important focus is on the comparison of 3D scatterplots of certain enhancement situations called Hamilton’s extreme example with those of redundancy situations. Such a comparison suggests that the basic mathematical concepts of two-predictor suppression situations need to be reconsidered with regard to the important issue of the statistical control function.
Polish inequality statistics reconsidered: are the poor really that poor?
Szulc A.
Abstract
In the present study income inequality in Poland is evaluated using corrected income data to provide more reliable estimates. According to most empirical studies based on household surveys and considering the European standards, the recent income inequality in Poland is moderate and decreased significantly after reaching its peaks during the first decade of the 21st century. These findings were challenged by Brzeziński et al. (2022), who placed Polish income inequality among the highest in Europe. Such a conclusion was possible when combining the household survey data with information on personal income tax. In the present study the above-mentioned findings are further explored using 2014 and 2015 data and employing additional corrections to the household survey incomes. Incomes of the poorest people are replaced by their predictions made on a large set of well-being correlates, using the hierarchical correlation reconstruction. Applying this method together with the corrections based on Brzeziński’s et al. results reduces the 2014 and 2015 revised Gini indices, still keeping them above the values obtained with the use of the survey data only. It seems that the hierarchical correlation reconstruction offers more accurate proxies to the actual low incomes, while matching tax data provides better proxies to the top incomes.
Two-stage cluster sampling with unequal probability sampling in the first stage and ranked set sampling in the second stage
Ugwu M.C., Madukaife M.S.
Abstract
In this research work we introduce a new sampling design, namely a two-stage cluster sampling, where probability proportional to size with replacement is used in the first stage unit and ranked set sampling in the second in order to address the issue of marked variability in the sizes of population units concerned with first stage sampling. We obtained an unbiased estimator of the population mean and total, as well as the variance of the mean estimator. We calculated the relative efficiency of the new sampling design to the two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling in the first stage and ranked set sampling in the second stage. The results demonstrated that the new sampling design is more efficient than the competing design when a significant variation is observed in the first stage units.
Modified exponential time series model with prediction of total COVID-19 cases in Belgium, Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland
Permpoonsinsup W., Sunthornwat R.
Abstract
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affected every country worldwide. In particular, outbreaks in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland entered the second wave and was exponentially increasing between July and November, 2020. The aims of the study are: to estimate the compound growth rate, to develop a modified exponential time-series model compared with the hyperbolic time-series model, and to estimate the optimal parameters for the models based on the exponential least-squares, three selected points, partial-sums methods, and the hyperbolic least-squares for the daily COVID-19 cases in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Poland and Switzerland. The speed and spreading power of COVID-19 infections were obtained by using derivative and root-mean-squared methods, respectively. The results show that the exponential least-squares method was the most suitable for the parameter estimation. The compound growth rate of COVID-19 infection was the highest in Switzerland, and the speed and spreading power of COVID-19 infection were the highest in Poland between July and November, 2020.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
477 citations, 7.01%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
287 citations, 4.22%
|
|
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
190 citations, 2.79%
|
|
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
102 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
72 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
63 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
57 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
53 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Microorganisms
47 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
46 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Medical Microbiology
46 citations, 0.68%
|
|
PLoS ONE
46 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
44 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
44 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses
42 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Antibiotics
40 citations, 0.59%
|
|
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
40 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Clinical Infectious Diseases
40 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Hospital Infection
38 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
38 citations, 0.56%
|
|
International Journal of Food Microbiology
37 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Scientific Reports
35 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Pathogens
32 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
32 citations, 0.47%
|
|
American Journal of Infection Control
30 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases
30 citations, 0.44%
|
|
BMC Infectious Diseases
28 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
26 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Infection
25 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Chemotherapy
24 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Microbiological Methods
24 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Infection
23 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Pathology
23 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
22 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Cureus
22 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
21 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Medical Mycology
21 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Anaerobe
21 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Microbial Pathogenesis
20 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Mycoses
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Emerging Infectious Diseases
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Fungi
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
American Journal of Medicine
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
19 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Food Control
18 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Pathology
17 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
17 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IDCases
17 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Veterinary Microbiology
16 citations, 0.24%
|
|
APMIS
16 citations, 0.24%
|
|
BMC Microbiology
15 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
15 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Future Microbiology
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Applied Microbiology
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Microbiology spectrum
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
FEMS Microbiology Letters
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Letters in Applied Microbiology
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Food Protection
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Transplant Infectious Disease
13 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Current Microbiology
13 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Mycopathologia
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Epidemiology and Infection
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Folia Microbiologica
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Research in Veterinary Science
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Parasitology Research
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal de Mycologie Medicale
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Foods
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
The Lancet
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Veterinary Sciences
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Journal of Epidemiology
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
New Microbes and New Infections
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Toxins
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Molecular and Cellular Probes
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Viruses
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
New England Journal of Medicine
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Dairy Science
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Virology
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Heliyon
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Infectious Diseases
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Medicina Clinica
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Microbial Drug Resistance
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Medicine (Barcelona)
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Molecules
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Elsevier
2273 citations, 33.41%
|
|
Springer Nature
719 citations, 10.57%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
482 citations, 7.08%
|
|
Wiley
401 citations, 5.89%
|
|
MDPI
338 citations, 4.97%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
252 citations, 3.7%
|
|
Oxford University Press
184 citations, 2.7%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
154 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
132 citations, 1.94%
|
|
SAGE
81 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Microbiology Society
81 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
63 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
53 citations, 0.78%
|
|
BMJ
48 citations, 0.71%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
44 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
43 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
37 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
33 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
32 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
21 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
20 citations, 0.29%
|
|
S. Karger AG
18 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
17 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
16 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
14 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Emerald
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
12 citations, 0.18%
|
|
IWA Publishing
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Annual Reviews
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Science Alert
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
11 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Academic Journals
10 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Veterinary World
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
9 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IOP Publishing
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IntechOpen
8 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
7 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
7 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
7 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
7 citations, 0.1%
|
|
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
British Veterinary Association
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Medknow
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
6 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association of Avian Pathologists Inc.
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
JMIR Publications
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
SLACK
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Southern Medical Association
5 citations, 0.07%
|
|
EDP Sciences
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SciELO
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
A and V Publications
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AACN Publishing
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hans Publishers
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Society for Healthcare-associated Infection Control and Prevention
4 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society for Parasitology
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Savezno Ministarstvo Odbrane
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Public Health Association
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Parasitology
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Central Research Institute for Epidemiology
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AOSIS
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Institute of Infectious Diseases
3 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
King Saud University
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Asian Network for Scientific Information
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Copernicus
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC)
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
2 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
47 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
31 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
22 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
19 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Chicago
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Minnesota
17 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Harvard University
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Arizona
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
16 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Washington
15 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
14 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of South Florida
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
13 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Utah
12 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Temple University
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
11 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Louisville
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Temple University Hospital
9 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Emory University
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Southern California
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Yale University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Stanford University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Chicago Medical Center
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Food and Drug Administration
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
New York Medical College
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
6 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Virginia Tech
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Loyola University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Creighton University
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
5 publications, 0.15%
|
|
University of Zurich
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
West Virginia University
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Toronto
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Alberta
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Lurie Children's Hospital
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Tennessee
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Connecticut Health
4 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Rush University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Ohio University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
McMaster University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Brown University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Manitoba
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Wright State University
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Kentucky
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Colorado Hospital
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mohammed VI
3 publications, 0.09%
|
|
St. John's Medical College
2 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
8 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
8 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 2.13%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
3 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
3 publications, 1.6%
|
|
University of Southern California
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
2 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Liverpool
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Duke University Health System
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Marquette University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Emory University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Toronto
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Calgary
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Alberta
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Florida International University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Nationwide Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mohammed VI
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Show all (24 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1299, 39.98%
USA
1299 publications, 39.98%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 54, 1.66%
Spain
54 publications, 1.66%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 54, 1.66%
Canada
54 publications, 1.66%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 27, 0.83%
Belgium
27 publications, 0.83%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 16, 0.49%
United Kingdom
16 publications, 0.49%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 0.46%
Australia
15 publications, 0.46%
|
India
|
India, 13, 0.4%
India
13 publications, 0.4%
|
France
|
France, 12, 0.37%
France
12 publications, 0.37%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 12, 0.37%
Malaysia
12 publications, 0.37%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 0.34%
Italy
11 publications, 0.34%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 9, 0.28%
Greece
9 publications, 0.28%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 0.25%
Switzerland
8 publications, 0.25%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 7, 0.22%
Argentina
7 publications, 0.22%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 0.18%
Brazil
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 0.18%
Mexico
6 publications, 0.18%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.18%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.18%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.12%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.12%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.12%
Japan
4 publications, 0.12%
|
China
|
China, 3, 0.09%
China
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 3, 0.09%
Israel
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.09%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.09%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.09%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.09%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 2, 0.06%
Germany
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.06%
Austria
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.06%
Iran
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.06%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.06%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.06%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.03%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.03%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.03%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.03%
Peru
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.03%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.03%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (5 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
USA
|
USA, 71, 37.77%
USA
71 publications, 37.77%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 6, 3.19%
Canada
6 publications, 3.19%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 1.06%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 1.06%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.53%
France
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.53%
Greece
1 publication, 0.53%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.53%
India
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.53%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.53%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.53%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.53%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.53%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|