Special Topics and Reviews in Porous Media
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.4
SJR
0.232
CiteScore
2.0
Categories
Engineering (miscellaneous)
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Areas
Engineering
Materials Science
Years of issue
2010-2025
journal names
Special Topics and Reviews in Porous Media
Special Topics & Reviews in Porous Media An International Journal
SPEC TOP REV POROUS
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Nanofluids
(250 citations)

Heat Transfer
(106 citations)

Special Topics and Reviews in Porous Media
(106 citations)
Top-3 organizations

National Institute of Technology Warangal
(16 publications)

University of Lucknow
(13 publications)

Vellore Institute of Technology University
(13 publications)

Vellore Institute of Technology University
(6 publications)

National Institute of Technology Warangal
(4 publications)

Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat
(3 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 337
Q2

Study on dynamic response of cushion layer-reinforced concrete slab under rockfall impact based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite-element method coupling
Mei X., Wu J., Wang T., Wang T., Liang X., Wang Y., Li B., Su T., Xu L.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
In the rockfall prevention and control project, the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and sand (gravel soil) soil cushion layer are commonly used to form the protection structure, thereby resisting the rockfall impact. Considering that the oversized deformation of the cushion layer under impact load using the finite element simulation cannot converge, this article establishes a numerical calculation model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics–finite-element method coupling (SPH–FEM). First, the standard Lagrange finite-element mesh is established for the whole model using ABAQUS, and then the finite-element mesh of the soil cushion layer is converted to SPH particle at the initial moment of the calculation, and finally the calculation results are solved and outputted. The results indicate that, compared with the results of the outdoor rockfall impact test, the relative errors of the rockfall impact force and the displacement of the RC slab are within 10%, which proves the rationality of the coupling algorithm; moreover, in terms of the numerical simulation, the SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more practical than the finite element for reproducing the mobility of the rockfall impacting the sand and soil particles. In addition, at an impact speed of less than 12 m·s−1, the cushion layer is able to absorb more than 85% of the impact energy, which effectively ensures that the RC slab is in an elastic working state under small impact energy and does not undergo destructive damage under large impact energy; the peak impact force of the rockfall is approximately linear with the velocity, and the simulated value of the peak impact force is basically the same as that of the theoretical value of Hertz theory; the numerical simulation is good for reproducing the damage process of the RC slab in accordance with the actual situation. The SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more justified than the FEM in simulating the large deformation problem, and it can provide a new calculation method for the design and calculation of the rockfall protection structure.
Q2

Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste fiber
Wang T., Cui S., Ren X., Zhang W., Yang X., Gong S., Yang D., Li B., Zhang W., Su T., Mei X., Dong X., Duan L., Ma Z., Cao X., et. al.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recycled concrete technology can promote the sustainable development of the construction industry, but the insufficient mechanical properties of recycled concrete have become a key constraint on its development. By adding waste fibers, the mechanical properties of recycled concrete can be improved, and the problem of disposing of waste polypropylene fibers can be solved. In this article, the effects of recycled brick aggregate content and waste fiber content on the mechanical properties and microstructures of recycled brick aggregate concrete through macroscopic mechanical experiments and microstructure experiments are investigated. The results show that the addition of recycled brick aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete; when the content of recycled brick aggregate is 100%, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decrease by 22.04 and 20.00%, respectively. The addition of waste fibers can improve the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete, but it is necessary to control the contents of waste fibers in a certain range. When the content of waste fibers is 0.08%, the best improvement effect on the mechanical properties of concrete is achieved; the compressive strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 6.06% (8.90%), while the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 2.30% (6.16%). Through microstructural analysis, the mechanism by which waste fiber improves the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete is revealed. The addition of waste fibers has the effect of strengthening the framework inside the recycled brick aggregate concrete, forming a good structural stress system and allowing the recycled brick aggregate concrete to continue to bear loads after cracking. In this study, waste brick aggregate and waste fiber are effectively utilized, which can not only reduce pollution to the environment but also realize the sustainable utilization of resources.
Q2

Coverage and reliability improvement of copper metallization layer in through hole at BGA area during load board manufacture
Zhu K., Xing R., Jiang Z., Zhong R., Chen L., Liu J., Miao H., Zhou G.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The dimple of ball grid array (BGA) area with 70 mm × 70 mm size on load board for high performance integrated circuit final test is investigated by shadow moire at first, the dimple of BGA area decreases from 184.3 to 97.1 μm when six additional prepregs with 60 mm × 60 mm size are added at BGA area before hot lamination process. The micromorphology and stress/strain simulation are conducted to improve the coverage and reliability of copper metallization layer in through hole at that BGA area. The microcracks of electroless copper layer at the position of glass fiber and inner layer copper pad, which leads to serious crack after solder float, are well covered by subsequent electroplating copper layer. When the through holes at BGA area with 0.2 mm diameter and 7.0 mm depth are fabricated based on insulating dielectric material used for high-speed signal transmission, the simulation results point out that IT968 is better than M6G for the thermal shock reliability of through hole metallization layer. A load board vehicle with 126 layers and 8.3 mm thickness based on IT968 shows good interconnection structure reliability after 12 times 288°C solder float.
Q2

Finite element analysis of deterioration of axial compression behavior of corroded steel-reinforced concrete middle-length columns
Nie R., Chen Y., Xing Z., Chen L., Yue Z., Chen W., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu S., Chen J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 8
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The corrosion problem of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns in coastal areas is becoming increasingly severe and needs to be solved urgently. This study established a numerical analysis model for SRC middle-length columns considering corrosion effects. The bond–slip constitutive relationship between corroded steel and concrete was established. It was found that when the rust rate is low, the bonding stress of SRC columns is slightly increased compared to those without corrosion. The ultimate and residual bonding stress will decrease significantly when the rust rate exceeds 1.5%. The comparison between the numerical analysis model and the experimental results shows that the establishment of the model is reasonable. Subsequent parameter analysis showed that for corroded SRC mid-length columns, the larger the slenderness ratio of the component, the faster the decrease in axial compression performance. The rust rate increased from 0 to 30%, and the axial compression performance of SRC columns decreased significantly. When the rust rate exceeded 30%, the axial compression performance of concrete columns tended to stabilize. A formula for calculating SRC middle-length columns’ ultimate bearing capacity considering corrosion effects has been proposed.
Q2

Effect of impurity components in titanium gypsum on the setting time and mechanical properties of gypsum-slag cementitious materials
Li Y., Jia Z., Li S., Li P., Jiang X., Zhang Z., Yu B.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The use of titanium gypsum instead of gypsum as a raw material for the preparation of gypsum-slag cementitious materials (GSCM) can reduce the cost and improve the utilization of solid waste. However, titanium gypsum contains impurities such as Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, which make its effect on the performance of GSCM uncertain. To investigate this issue, GSCM doped with different ratios of Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 were prepared in this study, the setting time and the strength of GSCM at 3, 7, and 28 days were tested. The effects of different oxides on the performance of GSCM were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy, energy spectrum analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The experimental results showed that Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 all had a certain procoagulant effect on GSCM and a slight effect on the strength. Through micro-analysis, it was found that the main hydration products of GSCM were AFt phase and calcium–alumina–silicate–hydrate (C–(A)–S–H) gels. Fe-rich C–(A)–S–H gels were observed with the addition of Fe2O3, and Mg(OH)2 and M–S–H gels were observed with the addition of MgO. The addition of TiO2 did not result in new hydration products from GSCM.
Q2

Research progress on Fe3+-activated near-infrared phosphor
Sun B., Zhang H., Wang Y.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 3
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Fe3+-activated near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials have attracted widespread attention due to their tunable emission wavelength and extensive applications in various fields such as plant growth, food analysis, biomedical imaging, and night vision. Many excellent NIR materials have been developed by introducing non-toxic and environmentally friendly Fe3+ ions into different inorganic hosts. This article elucidates the luminescent properties of Fe3+ ions by combining the Tanabe–Sugano energy level diagram and the configuration coordinate model. The latest research progress on Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials is outlined, summarizing the luminescent characteristics of various Fe3+-doped materials, including emission wavelength, emission bandwidth, quantum efficiency, and thermal stability. Particularly, a detailed summary and analysis of the application areas of Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are provided. Finally, the future prospects and challenges faced by Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are presented. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of the luminescence mechanism of Fe3+ and the research progress of iron ion-doped luminescent materials, aiming to develop advanced Fe3+-activated NIR luminescent materials with enhanced performance and explore new application fields.
Q2

Experimenting the influence of corncob ash on the mechanical strength of slag-based geopolymer concrete
Wang J., Qu Q., Khan S.A., Alotaibi B.S., Althoey F., Gamil Y., Najeh T.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The construction sector has been under growing public attention recently as one of the leading causes of climate change and its detrimental effects on local communities. In this regard, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed as a replacement for conventional concrete. Predicting the concrete’s strength before pouring is, therefore, quite useful. The mechanical strength of slag and corncob ash (SCA–GPC), a GPC made from slag and corncob ash, was predicted utilizing multi-expression programming (MEP). Modeling parameters’ relative importance was determined using sensitivity analysis. When estimating the compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of SCA–GPC with MEP, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.92 R
2-values were noted between the target and predicted results. The developed models were validated using statistical tests for error and efficiency. The sensitivity analysis revealed that within the mix proportions, the slag quantity (65%), curing age (25%), and fine aggregate (3.30%) quantity significantly influenced the mechanical strength of SCA–GPC. The MEP models result in distinct empirical equations for the strength characteristics of SCA–GPC, unlike Python-based models, which might aid industry and researchers worldwide in determining optimal mix design proportions, thus eliminating unneeded test repetitions in the laboratory.
Q2

Enhancement of hardness and wear strength of pure Cu and Cu–TiO2 composites via a friction stir process while maintaining electrical resistivity
Alnaser I.A., Yunus M.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to enhance the hardness and wear of copper and Cu–TiO2-based composites while maintaining high electrical conductivity through friction stir processing (FSP). It assesses the impact of TiO2 volume fractions and groove widths (GWs) on the wear, hardness, resistivity, and microstructure of FSPed Cu and FSPed Cu–TiO2 surface composite. The samples obtained from the stir zone showed an increase in microhardness of the Cu–TiO2 surface composite due to particle refinement, uniform distribution, and efficient sticking of TiO2 with Cu. Furthermore, the wear rate increased with decreasing TiO2 volume fractions in the composite. The worn surface microstructural analysis indicated a transition from harsh to gentle wear with increasing TiO2 volume fractions and GWs. The average grain size reduced significantly in reinforced stir zones compared to pure Cu, and particle size decreased further with increasing groove size. Hardness increased by 25 and 50% compared to unprocessed Cu, but only a negligible increase in electrical resistivity (2.3% Ωm) after FSP.
Q2

Effect of sand–precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer mortar with manufactured sand
Zhang P., Su J., Gao Z., Zhang T., Zhang P.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 11
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The geopolymer mortar (GPM) prepared from industrial by-products and alkali activation solution (AAS) is one of the hot spots of current building materials. As a feasible alternative to natural river sand, manufactured sand (MS) alleviates the global ecological pressure. In this study, MS was used for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution were used as AAS. Metakaolin (MK) and fly ash (FA) were used as the precursor to prepare MK-FA-based GPM with MS (MS-GPM), which was of great significance for saving non-renewable resources, mitigating the greenhouse effect, and recycling waste. Numerous studies were conducted to explore the effect of sand–precursor ratio (r
sp) on mechanical and durability characteristics of MS-GPM. Relationships between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength were established by linear fitting equation. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to systematically calculate the effect of r
sp on performance. The results indicated that the mechanical strength and impermeability of MS-GPM decreased and crack resistance increased with r
sp from 1 to 5. The strength of MS-GPM was the best when r
sp was 1. With the increase of r
sp, the proportion of MS in MS-GPM increases, and the relative cementitious material decreases, which has an adverse impact on mechanical properties and impermeability. Linear fitting revealed that the compressive strength of MS-GPM was closely related to tensile strength and flexural strength. ANOVA results indicated that r
sp in the range of 1–5 had great effects on the performance of MS-GPM. The aim of this article is to further promote the possibility of applying MS-GPM in practical engineering by designing reasonable r
sp.
Q2

Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete
Tian Q., Lu Y., Zhou J., Song S., Yang L., Cheng T., Huang J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R
2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
Q2

Grinding force model for ultrasonic assisted grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and experimental validation
Li Z., Yang S., Liu X., Xiao G., San H., Zhang Y., Wang W., Yang Z.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasonic vibration in the grinding process of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds can significantly reduce its processing difficulty. It is of great significance to understand the grinding mechanism of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and improve the processing efficiency by studying the mechanism of ordinary grinding of abrasive grains. Based on this, this study proposes a grinding force prediction model based on single-grain ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) chip formation mechanism. First, the prediction model of grinding force is established based on the chip formation mechanism of abrasive sliding ordinary grinding and the theory of ultrasonic assisted machining, considering the plastic deformation and shear effect in the process of material processing. Second, the UAG experiment of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds was carried out by using diamond grinding wheel, and the unknown coefficient in the model was determined. Finally, the predicted values and experimental values of grinding force under different parameters were compared to verify the rationality of the model. It was found that the maximum deviation between the predicted value of tangential force and the actual value is 23%, and the maximum deviation between the predicted value of normal force and the actual value is 21.7%. In addition, by changing the relevant parameters, the model can predict the grinding force of different metal materials under different processing parameters, which is helpful for optimizing the UAG parameters and improving the processing efficiency.
Q2

Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials
Guo C., Xu C., Xiao D., Cheng G., Zhong Y., Ding J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Multilayer adhesive bonded structures/materials (MABS) are widely used as structural components, especially in the field of aerospace. However, for MABS workpieces, the facts that the weak echo of the deep interfacial debonding defects (DB) caused by the large acoustic attenuation coefficient of each layer and this echo, which generally aliases with the excitation wave and the backwall echo of the surface layer, pose a great challenge for the conventional longitudinal wave ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods. In this work, an ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial DBs of MABS is proposed based on the ultrasonic resonance theory and the aliasing effect of ultrasonic waves in MABS. Theoretical and simulation analysis show that the optimal inspection frequency for II-interfacial DBs is 500 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 mm and the ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) thickness is 1.5 mm, and the optimal inspection frequency is 250 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 or 2.0 mm and the EPDM thickness is 2.0 mm. Verification experiments show that the presence of a DB in the II-interface causes a resonance effect, and in the same inspection configuration, the larger the defect size, the more pronounced this effect is. This resonance effect manifests itself as an increase in the amplitude and an increase in the vibration time of the A-scan signal as well as a pronounced change in the frequency of the received ultrasonic wave. In addition, the increase in the excitation voltage further highlights the ultrasonic resonance effect. Four imaging methods – the integrations of the signal and the signal envelope curve, the maximum amplitude of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal, and the signal energy – were used for C-scan imaging of ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS’s deep interfacial DBs and all these methods can clearly show the sizes and locations of the artificial defects and internal natural defect. The normalized C-scan imaging method proposed in this study can further highlight the weak changes in the signals in the C-scan image. The research results of this study have laid a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS.
Q2

Powder metallurgy processing of high entropy alloys: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Akinwekomi A.D., Bamisaye O.S., Bodunrin M.O.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Research attention in powder metallurgy (PM) processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) is rising. Some reviews have been published but a detailed historical analysis to identify the thematic research areas and prospective future research areas is lacking. Therefore, this study presents a bibliometric literature analysis of PM-processed HEAs by mapping and clustering 700 articles published between 2007 and August 2022 in the Scopus database. The most prolific authors, their collaborators, institutions, and most preferred journals publishing PM-HEA works are identified and mapped. Publication trend shows that significant research attention in the PM processing of HEAs began to gain traction in 2016. The top three journals in this field are Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials Science and Engineering A, and Intermetallics. However, co-authorship network analysis does not reveal significant inter-institutional research collaboration indicating that strengthening this area could help to accelerate scientific discovery, enhance technology transfer, and commercialization of HEA products. Based on the co-occurrence frequencies of author keywords, popular research directions are identified, and a systematic review of emerging functional applications is undertaken. This work provides a comprehensive visual reference guide for researchers to deepen their knowledge of this field and delivers insight into prospective future research opportunities to stimulate further ground-breaking works.
Q2

Marine polymers in tissue bioprinting: Current achievements and challenges
Banach-Kopeć A., Mania S., Tylingo R.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Bioprinting has a critical role in tissue engineering, allowing the creation of sophisticated cellular scaffolds with high resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. Achieving these parameters remains a challenge, necessitating bioinks that are biocompatible, printable, and biodegradable. This review highlights the potential of marine-derived polymers and crosslinking techniques including mammalian collagen and gelatin along with their marine equivalents. While denaturation temperatures vary based on origin, warm-water fish collagen and gelatin emerge as promising solutions. Building on the applications of mammalian collagen and gelatin, this study investigates their marine counterparts. Diverse research groups present different perspectives on printability and cell survival. Despite advances, current scaffolds are limited in size and layers, making applications such as extensive skin burn treatment or tissue regeneration difficult. The authors argue for the development of bioprinting, which includes spherical and adaptive printing. In adaptive printing, layers differentiate and propagate sequentially to overcome the challenges of multilayer printing and provide optimal conditions for the growth of deeply embedded cells. Moving the boundaries of bioprinting, future prospects include transformative applications in regenerative medicine.
Q2

Exploring the potential of agricultural waste as an additive in ultra-high-performance concrete for sustainable construction: A comprehensive review
Zhao J., Sufian M., Abuhussain M.A., Althoey F., Deifalla A.F.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
This study thoroughly reviews the recent design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) with agricultural waste. The goal is to identify UHPC composites that meets environmental sustainability requirements while fulfilling workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The capacity of typical review studies is limited in bridging the various literature aspects systematically. The article includes comparative analyses identifying these methods’ intrinsic connections and current trends. The analysis indicates that 71% of documents on incorporating agricultural waste into UHPC are in the “Engineering” and “Materials Science” disciplines, with 69% being journal articles, and 27% conference documents. Significant research keywords involve “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” “Cements,” “Sustainable Development,” and “Agricultural Wastes,” highlighting the extensive exploration of agricultural waste in UHPC. It has been discovered that agricultural waste can replace silica fume in UHPC, improving strength and durability by reducing pore volume and enhancing microstructure. Substituting 5–30% of cement with rice husk ash significantly boosts compressive strength, enhancing cement hydration, pore structure, and pozzolanic reaction, offering substantial environmental benefits and supporting the construction industry’s contribution to low-carbon sustainable development. This article provides guidance and recommendations for developing sustainable UHPC to meet diverse design specifications, promoting environmentally friendly construction practices.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Journal of Nanofluids
250 citations, 11.01%
|
|
Special Topics and Reviews in Porous Media
106 citations, 4.67%
|
|
Heat Transfer
106 citations, 4.67%
|
|
ZAMM Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
40 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
36 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
34 citations, 1.5%
|
|
International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics
31 citations, 1.37%
|
|
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
30 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Transport in Porous Media
28 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Journal of Porous Media
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
International Journal of Ambient Energy
26 citations, 1.15%
|
|
European Physical Journal Plus
25 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
25 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Numerical Heat Transfer; Part A: Applications
22 citations, 0.97%
|
|
International Journal of Thermal Sciences
22 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
22 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
21 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Waves in Random and Complex Media
20 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Scientific Reports
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Fuel
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
International Journal of Modelling and Simulation
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Energies
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Chinese Journal of Physics
15 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Results in Engineering
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Materials
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Energy & Fuels
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Modern Physics Letters B
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
International Journal of Thermofluids
12 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Fluids
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
BioNanoScience
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
World Journal of Engineering
11 citations, 0.48%
|
|
European Physical Journal: Special Topics
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Geofluids
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Processes
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Advances in Water Resources
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Applied Thermal Engineering
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition)
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Physica Scripta
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
SN Applied Sciences
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Acta Mechanica
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Mathematics
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Computational and Theoretical Transport
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Journal of Physics
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Heat Transfer
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Heliyon
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Engineering Creative Design in Robotics and Mechatronics
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Physics
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Polymers
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Modern Physics C
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Crystals
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Results in Physics
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Materials
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Thermofluid Science and Technology
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Defect and Diffusion Forum
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Mechanics
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Nanomaterials
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Applied Mathematics and Computation
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Procedia Engineering
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Energy Reports
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Energy
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Refrigeration
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
PLoS ONE
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pramana - Journal of Physics
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Colloid Journal
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Petroleum Science
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
|
Elsevier
466 citations, 20.53%
|
|
Springer Nature
367 citations, 16.17%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
250 citations, 11.01%
|
|
Wiley
186 citations, 8.19%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
167 citations, 7.36%
|
|
Begell House
136 citations, 5.99%
|
|
MDPI
112 citations, 4.93%
|
|
AIP Publishing
74 citations, 3.26%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
46 citations, 2.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
42 citations, 1.85%
|
|
SAGE
36 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Emerald
29 citations, 1.28%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
29 citations, 1.28%
|
|
World Scientific
27 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
18 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
16 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Alexandria University
15 citations, 0.66%
|
|
ASME International
14 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
13 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Ain Shams University
10 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
9 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Oxford University Press
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
IGI Global
8 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 citations, 0.31%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
6 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Wen Dao (Hong Kong) Culture Media Corporation Limited
5 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Tech Science Press
4 citations, 0.18%
|
|
King Saud University
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
3 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Editions Technip
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IWA Publishing
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Florestas
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Bialystok University of Technology
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Thomas Telford
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IntechOpen
2 citations, 0.09%
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Haerbin Gongcheng Daxue/Harbin Engineering University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Copernicus
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and China Water and Power Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Assoc Nonwoven Fabrics Ind
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Allerton Press
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
ASTM International
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
GeoScienceWorld
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
SAE International
1 citation, 0.04%
|
|
Show all (44 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
National Institute of Technology Warangal
16 publications, 3.18%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
13 publications, 2.58%
|
|
University of Lucknow
13 publications, 2.58%
|
|
Khalifa University
10 publications, 1.99%
|
|
University of Tehran
9 publications, 1.79%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
9 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Vidyasagar University
8 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Thessaly
7 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Shiraz University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Petroleum University of Technology Iran
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Bangalore University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Gulbarga University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Regina
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Osmania University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Allahabad
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
University of Monastir
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
South Valley University
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
National Engineering School of Monastir
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
International Islamic University, Islamabad
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Tsinghua University
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Sri Venkateswara University
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapur
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Kakatiya University
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Shandong University
4 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) Varanasi
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Hamirpur
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Basrah
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Kuwait University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Himachal Pradesh University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Ain Shams University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
King Khalid University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Qassim University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Panjab University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Bharathiar University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Calicut
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Central University of Karnataka
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Australian College of Kuwait
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Central South University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Chongqing University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Northeast Petroleum University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Qingdao University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Waterloo
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Minnesota
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Calgary
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Aswan University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Abou Bekr Belkaïd
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Windsor
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Far Eastern Federal University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Taibah University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Tabuk
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
National University of Sciences & Technology
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Malakand
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Bahauddin Zakariya University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
University of Sargodha
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
6 publications, 3.31%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Warangal
4 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat
3 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Allahabad
3 publications, 1.66%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
International Islamic University, Islamabad
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) Varanasi
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Calicut
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Basrah
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Vidyasagar University
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Jordan
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Thessaly
2 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Isfahan University of Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Bahauddin Zakariya University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Raipur
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Goa
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Shahrood University of technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Muhammad Nawaz Sharif University of Agriculture
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Karakoram International University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Central University of Jharkhand
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Central University of Karnataka
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Manipal University Jaipur
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Pandit Deendayal Energy University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Kuwait University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Australian College of Kuwait
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Lucknow
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Bangalore University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Gulbarga University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Multimedia University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Hashemite University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Himachal Pradesh University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Shanghai University of Engineering Science
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Parma
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Pretoria
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Ilorin
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Henan Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of West Attica
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Monastir
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Menoufia University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Abou Bekr Belkaïd
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Badji Mokhtar - Annaba University
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of Oran - Mohamed Boudiaf
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Bechar
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University Yahia Fares of Medea
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
National Engineering School of Monastir
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Bath
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
University of Windsor
1 publication, 0.55%
|
|
Show all (34 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
India
|
India, 150, 29.82%
India
150 publications, 29.82%
|
China
|
China, 59, 11.73%
China
59 publications, 11.73%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 48, 9.54%
Iran
48 publications, 9.54%
|
USA
|
USA, 35, 6.96%
USA
35 publications, 6.96%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 17, 3.38%
Canada
17 publications, 3.38%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 15, 2.98%
Iraq
15 publications, 2.98%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 15, 2.98%
Pakistan
15 publications, 2.98%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 12, 2.39%
Greece
12 publications, 2.39%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 10, 1.99%
UAE
10 publications, 1.99%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 1.79%
Germany
9 publications, 1.79%
|
France
|
France, 9, 1.79%
France
9 publications, 1.79%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 1.79%
Egypt
9 publications, 1.79%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 8, 1.59%
Saudi Arabia
8 publications, 1.59%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 8, 1.59%
Tunisia
8 publications, 1.59%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 7, 1.39%
Algeria
7 publications, 1.39%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 7, 1.39%
Japan
7 publications, 1.39%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 6, 1.19%
Malaysia
6 publications, 1.19%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.99%
Italy
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 5, 0.99%
Kuwait
5 publications, 0.99%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 0.99%
South Africa
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.8%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.8%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.6%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.6%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.6%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.6%
Romania
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.4%
Russia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.4%
Australia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 2, 0.4%
United Kingdom
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.2%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.2%
Austria
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.2%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.2%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.2%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.2%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.2%
Norway
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.2%
Poland
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.2%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.2%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.2%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 1, 0.2%
Trinidad and Tobago
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.2%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.2%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Show all (12 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
India
|
India, 47, 25.97%
India
47 publications, 25.97%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 4.42%
Iran
8 publications, 4.42%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 3.87%
Pakistan
7 publications, 3.87%
|
China
|
China, 5, 2.76%
China
5 publications, 2.76%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 4, 2.21%
Iraq
4 publications, 2.21%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 3, 1.66%
Algeria
3 publications, 1.66%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 1.66%
Greece
3 publications, 1.66%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 1.1%
Jordan
2 publications, 1.1%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 2, 1.1%
Kuwait
2 publications, 1.1%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 1.1%
Tunisia
2 publications, 1.1%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.55%
Germany
1 publication, 0.55%
|
USA
|
USA, 1, 0.55%
USA
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.55%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.55%
Italy
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 0.55%
Canada
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.55%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.55%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.55%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.55%
UAE
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.55%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.55%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.55%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.55%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.55%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.55%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|